RESOLUTION No. 43-2021; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF STUART AND MULLIGANS STUART ACQUISITION, LLC FOR LEASE OF THE PROPERTY AT 131 SW FLAGLER AVENUE TO S & C RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC FOR THE BALANCE OF THE LEASE TERM WHICH IS SET TO EXPIRE ON APRIL 30, 2038; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

]

UM YEAH, I ASKED TO PULL 20. I SPOKE WITH STAFF. OVER THE LAST WEEK ABOUT THIS, UM. AND RE READING THE LEASE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAD WITH THE ORIGINAL LEASE AGREEMENT AND THEN THE AMENDED AS OF LAST YEAR WITH MULLIGAN'S, UM, IN THIS ASSIGNMENT SECTION. WE ARE. WE ARE COMPELLED TO NOT ARBITRARILY HOLD UP ANY ASSIGNMENT AND I DON'T INTEND TO DO THAT THIS EVENING. HOWEVER THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THAT SECTION IN THE LEASE AGREEMENT. ALLOWS US TO REQUIRE OR YOU KNOW, TO REQUEST A PRESENTATION OR SOME SORT OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE POTENTIAL. UM ASSIGN ME AND I DID A LITTLE BIT OF RESEARCH ESSENCE YOUR RESTAURANT GROUP LLC AND I KNOW THAT. COS YOU KNOW, COME AND GO AND MERGE AND. AND, UH, IT'S AS OF 20 FORMED BASED ON SUNBIZ IN DECEMBER, 2020. TO REGISTERED AGENTS ONE AND ONE AND STUART NOT IN THE CITY AND THEN ONE IN JUPITER. UM, I HAD ASKED IF WE COULD IF I COULD AT LEAST GET A CALL FROM THEM. SHAKE THEIR HAND. GET TO KNOW WHO'S GONNA BE DOING BUSINESS WITH US AND ONE OF OUR PRIME PROPERTIES, AND I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING. SO I WONDER IF ANYBODY IS HERE.

IF THE BROKERS WAY HAD WE HAD TOLD THEM IT WAS UN CONSENT AND THAT THEY DID NOT NEED TO ATTEND. WHEN YOU ASKED ME ON FRIDAY IF I COULD REACH OUT TO THEM, I DID. BUT I DIDN'T REACH OUT TILL THIS MORNING. SO I HAVEN'T HEARD BACK FROM THEM, BUT I WAS ASKING THEM FOR SOME RESUME AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION AS I MENTIONED TO YOU WHEN WE SPOKE. I DO KNOW THAT THE TWO PRINCIPALS IN THE COMPANY HAD EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE AND OWNERSHIP WITH CHIPOTLE E BUSINESSES. DON'T KNOW. TO WHAT EXTENT THEY DON'T KNOW HOW MANY. I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG? I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MEANS THAT THEY WORKED THEIR'S CASHIERS OR IF THEY ACTUALLY OWNED HIM, BUT I COULDN'T LET YOU KNOW I CAN FOLLOW UP ON IT. YOU GUYS ARE FREE, TOO.

CONTINUED. IF YOU WANT OR. AND ALSO JUST ABOUT THERE IS THERE'S NO CHANGE AT ALL TO THE SUBSTANCE OF THE LEASE, AND THE OTHER WAS IN THERE BUYING A FRANCHISE MULLIGAN'S FRANCHISE TO CONTINUE THAT LOCATION IS AND THE OTHER THING YOU COULD DO IS A. GETS A CONDITION. OF THE APPROVAL IS YOU COULD MOVE TO APPROVE IT CONDITION UPON THEM. DON'T TAKE TOO, UM, PROVIDING INFORMATION BY THURSDAY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT IF YOU ARE INCLINED, BUT THAT'S YOUR DISCRETION. WELL I DON'T KNOW HOW THE REST OF THE BOARD FEELS. I JUST I MEAN, YOU KNOW, IT'S THE WAY WE STILL HAVE SEVERAL YEARS LEFT ON THE LEASE, AND IT'S A. I HOPE THAT IT SUCCEEDS. I'M CONFIDENT THAT IT WILL. BUT I WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? SO I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE I'M JUST OVER. I'M JUST WORRYING AND NOBODY ELSE. THINKING ABOUT IT. WELL I'M IF I DON'T MIND, I FEEL THAT IF I JUMP IN, I THINK THAT I WAS CHARACTER KIND OF SURPRISED TO SEE THIS ON THE AGENDA BECAUSE I HADN'T HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT A SALE OR ANYTHING. I'M ELEGANT, SO I WAS KIND OF SURPRISED, BUT. UM I WOULD SAY THAT THE. CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF DELEGATES PROBABLY VETTED HIM BECAUSE IT'S OBVIOUSLY THE STATE SUBSTANTIAL BUSINESS FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF WHAT THEIR FINANCIAL STAKE IS, UM. SO I GUESS THAT HE'S NOT GONNA TURN OVER THE OWNERSHIP ISN'T GOING TO TURN OVER THE RESTAURANT TO PEOPLE THAT DON'T HAVE A CLUE THAT BEING SAID IF YOU WANT TO, UH. PROVE IT CONDITIONAL ON THEM, PROVIDING A RESUME RECEIVE E ON THE OWNERSHIP BY THE END OF THE WEEK. I'M FINE WITH THAT. SO. OKAY. I HAD MORE TELL WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THEY DEFAULT ON THE RENTAL PAYMENTS. WE WOULD TAKE POSSESSION OF THE RESTAURANT. BUT THEY'VE BUT MULLIGAN'S PUT OVER $300,000 AND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE RESTAURANTS WOULD PROBABLY THE BEST. YOU KNOW, IT WOULDN'T HURT US NOW. I DON'T KNOW THAT

[02:00:03]

WE WANT TO GET INTO A VACANT RESTAURANT AND GO BACK TO ALL THE OTHER STUFF. BUT.

EVERYTHING IS IT'S NORMALLY NOT THAT EASY. WHAT WHERE IT GETS COMPLICATED IS WHERE THEY FILED BANKRUPTCY OR HOLD IT UP. IT'S GIVING IT BACK SO EASY. IT ZOOM OR IF THERE WAS A BANKRUPTCY OR OTHER LENDERS OR CREDITORS OR OTHER ISSUES THAT WOULD CREATE YOUR PROBLEMS. I'M NOT SUGGESTING THERE'S ANY EVIDENCE OF THAT AT ALL. I'M JUST SAYING THAT IN REALITY THAT WOULD BE MORE OF A CONCERN OF MINE THAN JUST GETTING THE PROPERTY BACK. SO IN THAT CASE, MADAM MAYOR, THEN I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITION THAT WE RECEIVED FROM SNC RESTAURANT GROUP GROUP LLC AND OR THEIR AGENTS. CV. OF THEIR PREVIOUS RESTAURANT EXPERIENCE. WITHIN THE NEXT. WHAT IS IT? IT'S SECTOR. EXPIRE ON TODAY'S DATE. TRANSFERRED TODAY, EFFECTIVE IN THE RESOLUTION. APRIL 30 YEARS FOR MINUTE ENDS ON APRIL 30TH RESOLUTION LANGUAGE SAYS IT WOULD GO HARD TODAY, MAYOR. HIS EMOTION. DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT OR YOU'RE GONNA, SECONDLY, IT'S A COMMENT. UNLESS YOU'RE GONNA WAIT FOR A SECOND OR MAY I COMMENT? OKAY, WE JUST NEED TO KNOW IF IT'S GONNA BE. YEAH. GO AHEAD. FINISH YOUR REQUEST IN A WEEK. WAY SHOULD EXTEND THAT THE YEAH. EIGHT RIGHT. RECOGNIZE THIS? THE LEAST GOES TILL 2038 WHAT YOU GUYS DO TODAY. YOU DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO CONCERN YOURSELF WITH THEIR CLOSING. I MEAN, THEY CHOSE TODAY'S DATE FOR WHATEVER PURPOSES IN THEIR CONTRACT, BUT YOU'RE NOT A PARTY TO THAT CONTRACT. SO IF YOU CONTINUED IT OR DIDN'T GET VOTED NO. I MEAN, SO YOU WEREN'T TIED TO TODAY'S DATE THEY PICKED THAT IS THEIR CLOSING DATE. BUT IF YOU MOVED IT TO THE NEXT CITY COMMISSION MEETING, THEY'D HAVE TO PICK A NEW DAY. SO YOU KNOW, PICKING LATER THIS WEEK.

THEY'RE JUST GONNA HAVE TO CONTEND WITH IT. WAS ALREADY SO I'LL SAY JUST A WEEK. MONDAY.

YEAH, I'M NOT ASKING FOR THE MOON AND STARS. AND IF THEY GET A CENTER THAT THEY CAN IF IT'S HOLDING UP THE CLOSING ALL THEY WILL TAKE HIM FIVE MINUTES TO PRODUCE THE CVS RESTAURANT EXPERIENCE. WE SHOULDN'T WE WANT TO KNOW THAT SO FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH? MULLIGANS. CURRENT OPERATION. AND DO WHATEVER THEY WANT AND TRANSFER AND DO THIS. CLOSING TO SNC RESTAURANT GROUP IF IT SO CHOOSES UNTIL THE COMMISSION VOTES TO APPROVE THE ASSIGNMENT. MULLIGAN STEWARD ACQUISITION LOC JUST REMAINS LIABLE UNDER THE LEASE SO THEY CAN CLOSE TODAY. DO THEIR TRANSACTION DO THEIR WHOLE THING. IT'S JUST THE CURRENT PRINCIPLES OF MULLIGAN STUART ACQUISITION. WOULD NOT BE RELEASED FROM THIS UNTIL THIS CONTINGENCY OCCURS, WHICH WOULD BE LATER IN THE WEEK. THANK YOU. AND I KNOW THAT PERMISSION. BRO HAS A COMMENT, BUT I WANT TO SAY IN LIGHT OF SOME OF THE THINGS THAT POINT SHOULD BRUNO HAD BROUGHT UP WITH REGARD TO WHETHER IT'S STUART GREEN MARKET OR OTHER THINGS WERE GONNA BE EVENTUALLY ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH THIS GROUP. EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE BEING, UH. SIGN FROM MULLIGANS AND I REMEMBER WHEN WAY. FIRST STARTED WITH THE GROUP THAT WAS THERE BEFORE. IT WAS A BIG DEAL, AND I THINK THAT WE DO NEED TO SEE YOU KNOW THESE PEOPLE THAT IS GONNA BE RENTING OUR BUILDING. AND TO, UM. JUST YOU KNOW, I MEAN IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. I DON'T WANT ANYBODY TO MISS MISS PERCEIVED THAT THESE GUYS WERE HIDING IN THE SHADOWS. THEY HAVE. BEEN VERY COOPERATIVE WITH THE CITY. THEY HAVE COMMUNICATED WITH THE CITY MANAGER THAT COMMUNICATED WITH ME. I KNOW THAT COMMUNICATED WITH STEVE NICOLOSI WHEN WE HAD SOME ISSUES ABOUT LIKE WHAT WAS REPAIRED AND WHAT WASN'T REPAIRED. JUST REALITY IS A TIMING THING. I THINK THEY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE INFORMATION. I DON'T WANT THE INTENT TO MAKE THAT BE THE JUST. I MEAN, I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO LOOK HIM IN THE EYE AND SHAKE THEIR HAND. BEFORE. MR BRUNER. JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT I DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT WAS BEING SOLD OF. CITY MANAGER AND THAT OUR CITY ATTORNEY TOLD ME. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE LEASE AND WE ALSO HAVE DEALT WITH COVERED WITH RESTAURANTS AND THINGS, BUT I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM. P ONE OF. SEE THE PERSON AND SHAKE THEIR HAND. SO, BUT I WANTED TO ADD THAT IN THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THERE'S A MOTION AND THERE'S A SECOND. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION FOR MORE, UM, BOARD? ANY COMMENTS ON THE PUBLIC. BELIEVE THE CITY ATTORNEY NEEDS TO BE THE TITLE. YES, PLEASE READ THE RESOLUTION TITLE. THIS'D BE RESOLUTION 43 DISH 2021 RESOLUTION, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF STUART. AND

[02:05:02]

MULLIGAN. STUART ACQUISITION LOC RELEASE OF THE PROPERTY AT 131 SELFLESS FLAGLER AVENUE TO S AND C RESTAURANT GROUP LOC FOR THE BALANCE OF POLICE TERM, WHICH IS SET TO EXPIRE ON APRIL. 30TH 2038. FIGHTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES IN MY UNDERSTANDING THE MOTION IS THAT THE APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON THEM, PROVIDING A CV AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF THEIR FINANCIAL ABILITY. BY THE END OF THE WEEK. ONE. MAY I MARRY? JUST CLARIFIED WHAT? BECAUSE SO WHAT CONSTITUTES COULD, BUT LET'S SAY WORST CASE SCENARIO. THEY DON'T LIKE THAT. I'M ASKING THIS AND THEY JUST SEND US OF. HE'S A PAPER WITH A BIG SMILEY FACE, AND IT'S A CV ON THE TOP. I MEAN, DOES. WHAT WOULD CONSTITUTE A CV AND FINANCIALS? HONESTLY THAT ZOO REALLY GOOD QUESTION. THAT'S PROBABLY GONNA BE YOUR DISCRETION MORE THAN.

MIND. YOU COULD MAKE THE MOTION BE TO YOUR SATISFACTION. WELL, I THINK YOU'RE IN THE COURSE OF BUSINESS. THESE BUSINESSES HAVE. CERTAIN BASIC CRITERIA THERE YEAR IN FINANCIALS ALONG THEY'VE BEEN IN BUSINESS. WELL IN THAT CASE, CAN WE JUST CAN WE JUST. OKAY, WELL, BYE BYE.

NEXT MEETING IT'S STILL WITHIN BEFORE THE APRIL 30TH DATE BY NEXT MEETING. WE'LL HAVE. GIVE US THAT AND WE'LL HAVE IT ON APRIL 30TH DAY. THAT'S IN 2030. IT'S SET TO EXPIRE. 2038 SORRY.

YES. SO THEN. CAN WE JUST DO IT FOR THAT TILL THE NEXT MEETING THAT WAY? THERE'S NOT THIS ARBITRARY, CLOSE, AND IF WE GIVE THEM FOR FIVE DAYS, THAT'S GOOD ENOUGH. OKAY OH, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT, YOU KNOW, ASKING FOR FINANCIAL THAT MAY BE A PROPRIETARY. THING THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO DISCLOSE. WELL, HE SAID. TO TRY TO DEFINE MAYBE BECAUSE I HEARD THE TV HISTORY THAT THIS IS MY RESTAURANT EXPERIENCE. NOT THESE ARE MY FINANCIALS. I THINK THOSE ARE TWO SEPARATE. WELL, I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO SEE THEIR TAX RETURNS. UNDER THE ASSIGNMENT. THE COMMISSION HAS THE RIGHT TO MAKE A DECISION BASED UPON. IT'S THE ABILITY OF THE. SUMER OR THE PERSON THAT WOULD BE BEING RECEIVING THE ASSIGNMENT TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY. AND IT MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE THE FINANCIALS THAT WOULD GIVE THEM SHOW YOU EVERY DOLLAR. WE'RE LOOKING FOR IS SOME KIND OF INDICATION THAT DEMONSTRATES TO THE COMMISSION THAT THEY WILL, IN FACT, BE A MM. SUCCESSFUL PROVIDER ASSIGNMENT SAYS. LET'S SEE MAY NOT ASSIGN ANY YOUR PORTION OF THIS LEASE OR SUBLEASE THE WHOLE OR ANY PART OF THE PREMISES, INCLUDING PORTIONS OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS ERECTED THERE ON BY LESS OR OTHER PORTIONS OF THE PREMISES FOR ANY PURPOSE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE LESS OR. WHICH CONSENT SHALL NOT BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD OR DELAYED. ANY ASSIGNMENT MAY BE CONDITIONED BY THE LESSER ON THE COMMERCIAL SUITABILITY. GOOD REPUTATION IN THE COMMUNITY AND THE FINANCIAL STRENGTH AND SOLVENCY OF THE PROPOSED TO SIGN ME, SO I THINK THAT THERE'S SUCH LANGUAGE TO ASK YOU SOMETHING. AND THIS WAS A HUGE, YOU KNOW, DOCUMENT, BUT BUT STILL YEAH. SO THERE'S A MOTION IN THE SECOND. ARE YOU CLEAR, MADAM CLERK? I STILL HAVE IT IN ONE WEEK. IS THAT CORRECT? YES. THE NEXT MONDAY. IT WAS A BUSINESS NEXT MONDAY.

AGAIN ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON THIS MATTER? OKAY? MADAM CLERK. IF I'M SORRY FOR DOING THIS, BUT JUST I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I CAN TELL THEM. WHAT HAPPENED TONIGHT? THE MEETING IS THAT THE COMMISSION APPROVED THE ASSIGNMENT. CONDITIONED UPON THIS HAPPENING BY NEXT WEEK, BUT AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, THEY CAN MOVE FORWARD ON THE CLOSING, AND THEN IF THEY WERE TO DOT PROVIDE THE INFORMATION, THE COMMISSION WOULD JUST TREAT IT AS IF IT DIDN'T OCCUR WHEN STILL LOOKING TO MULLIGAN'S FOR THE ACCOUNTABILITY. RIGHT THAT FEAR. I'M NOT A LAWYER, BUT I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT THEIR INTENT IS RIGHT AT LEAST WOULDN'T BE A SIGN. PERFECT. THAT'S GREAT, OKAY. HAD COMMISSIONER BRUNER AS THE SECOND TO THAT CORRECT.

NO, NOTHING LIKE THAT. I WAS MY DONALD MEYER. I'M SORRY. THANK YOU. LIAR I WILL SECOND THE MOTION. OKAY THANK YOU. OH, I DIDN'T KNOW YOU WAY WENT OFF ALONG WITHOUT A SECOND THERE, I THINK WE EVEN VOTED. I THOUGHT THAT WE HAD ALWAYS SAID. OKAY, MADAM CLERK. OKAY VICE MAYOR MATHESON? YES COMMISSIONER. BRUNER? YES MR MACDONALD? YES COMMISSIONER MYERS? YES MAYOR CLARKE? YES? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CITY MANAGER. ITEM NUMBER 21. YES MADAM MAYOR. I PULLED

[21.

LIME SLAKERS REFURBISHMENT PROJECT (RC):

RESOLUTION No. 44-2021; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA APPROVES THE AWARD OF ITB #2021-105, LIME SLAKERS REFURBISHMENT PROJECT TO THE SECOND LOWEST, RESPONSIVE, AND RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WITH A TOTAL UNIT PRICE OF $212,870.00 TO TLC DIVERSIFIED, INC. OF PALMETTO, FLORIDA PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

]

THIS ITEM BECAUSE IT HAS AN ERROR AND THE BOTH IN THE BODY OF THE RESOLUTION IN THE TITLE.

THE ONE THAT WAS IN THE CONSIDER. JIN, THE ITEM SAID IT WAS A WORD TO THE SECOND LOWEST BIDDER, BUT IN FACT IT WAS THE LOWEST BIDDER THAT SHOULD BE AWARDED TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE HAND OUT TO YOU IN THE CORRECTED ONE NOW HAS THE CORRECT BURBAGE IN IT, AND THE

[02:10:03]

CITY ATTORNEY WILL READ THE TITLE. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA APPROVES THE AWARD. OF I T B 2021 DISH ONE OF FIVE LIME SLICKERS REFURBISHMENT PROJECT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE, BITTER WITH A TOTAL UNIT PRICE OF 212,800. TWO OUT TWO. TLC DIVERSIFIED INK OF PALMETTO, FLORIDA PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES FOR APPROVAL. SECOND AND MORE THAN SECONDARY. IN A DISCUSSION. ANY COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON ITEM NUMBER, 21 LIME SLICKERS REFURBISHMENT PROJECT. I THOUGHT THEY WERE PULLING. THE CITY MANAGER SAID THAT YOU COULD EXPLAIN ABOUT WATERS PROCESS. YEAH, I HOPE NOW. NO COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC'S CITY CLERK. COMMISSIONER MEYER. YES MR MACDONALD? YES COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES, VICE MAYOR MATHESON. YEAH. MAYOR CUT? YES. NOW WE MOVE TO OUR COMMISSION. I THEN WE HAVE ORDINANCE SECOND READING, MR MARTEL. THIS IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 2461-2. IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

[22.

CENTRAL PARKWAY LOFTS - MAJOR AMENDMENT TO RPUD (QUASI-JUDICIAL) (RC):

ORDINANCE No. 2461-2021; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING A 6.65 ACRE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF TWO PARCELS OPPOSITE ONE ANOTHER ON S.E. CENTRAL PARKWAY APPROXIMATELY MIDWAY BETWEEN ITS INTERSECTIONS WITH S. KANNER HIGHWAY TO THE WEST AND U.S. HIGHWAY ONE TO THE EAST TO APPROVE A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE “CENTRAL PARK LOFTS (NORTH)” AND THE CENTRAL PARK LOFTS (SOUTH) RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) CONSISTING OF ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO (172) MULTI-FAMILY UNITS WITHIN FOUR (4) INDIVIDUAL FOUR-STORY APARTMENT BUILDINGS; WITH SAID LANDS BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED; APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT; DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

]

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING A 6.65 ACRE PROPERTY CONSISTENT CONSISTING OF TWO PARCELS OPPOSITE ONE ANOTHER ON SOUTH EAST CENTRAL PARKWAY.

APPROXIMATELY MIDWAY BETWEEN ITS INTERSECTIONS WITH SOUTH CANNER HIGHWAY TO THE WEST AND U. S HIGHWAY ONE TO THE EAST TO APPROVE A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL PARK LOFTS. NORTH AND CENTRAL PARK, LOS SOUTH RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. CONSISTING OF 172 MULTI FAMILY UNITS WITHIN FOUR INDIVIDUAL FOUR STORY APARTMENT BUILDINGS. WAS SET LANDS BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT. DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FIGHTING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. KEEP IT. THANK YOU, SIR.

COMMISSIONERS. UM STAFF. DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FROM THE SECOND READING FROM THE FIRST READ IN TWO SECONDS? OKAY THIS IS I'M ASKING, OKAY. DON'T HAVE ANYBODY TO BE SWORN IN AND IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT THERE WERE CHANGES, THERE'S GONNA BE FULL PRESENTATION AGAIN TONIGHT.

LET ME ASK MY COMMISSIONS IF THEY'VE HAD AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION BEFORE WE START WITH STEP FORWARD SPIRIT IN COMMISSION BRUNER. WELL I'VE SPOKEN WITH BOTH SIDES. AND.

ANY MANAGER AND I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. THANK YOU, COMMISSION MCDONALD. I'VE SPOKEN WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE APPLICANT, THE INTERVENER. RESIDENTS AND STAFF AND I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR. I DO HAVE UNOPENED MIND AS ALWAYS.

I'VE SPOKEN WITH THE APPLICANT, THE INTERVENER. MULTIPLE RESIDENTS ON STAFF AS WELL.

SPOKEN WITH THE. APPLICANT AND WITH INTERVENER AND OTHER RESIDENTS, AND I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND COMMISSION. MEYER. HAVE SPOKEN WITH STAFF WITH THE APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVES WITH THE INTERVENER WITH RESIDENTS. AND I AM HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. OKAY COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER, UM. WITH ALL OF THOSE HOTEL. COULD YOU PLEASE SWEAR IN THOSE? WELL ALL OF THOSE PLANNING TO GIVE TESTIMONY TONIGHT, PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THERE ARE 12345. DON'T MR CARTER, ARE YOU PLANNING TO TELL? OKAY 1234567 THAT IT LOOKS APPEARS THAT THERE'S EIGHT PEOPLE BEING SWORN. YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD. LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THEY ALL TESTIFIED AFFIRMATIVELY, INCLUDING REPRESENTATIVES OF THE APPLICANT, THE INTERVENER AS WELL, A CITY STAFF. THANK YOU. STAFF, WILL YOU PLEASE PRESENT ANY. YOU EVIDENCE OR CHANGES YOUR TESTIMONY THAT YOU HAVE SINCE THE FIRST READING? YES GOOD EVENING, MADAM MAYOR TOM REED, SENIOR PLANNER FOR THE RECORD. WILL MAKE A SHORT PRESENTATION GOING OVER MAINLY THE CHANGES SINCE THE FIRST RATING. THE APPLICANT ALSO HAS A PRESENTATION THAT SHE'LL GIVE AFTER MINE. ALSO MENTIONED THIS IS THE SECOND READING THE FIRST READING LAST MONTH WAS APPROVED. BY THE COMMISSION. IF YOU REMEMBER THERE WERE FIVE BUILDINGS IS PART OF THE LAST PRESENTATION SINCE THE FIRST READING THE APPLICANTS REMOVED

[02:15:04]

THE FIFTH BUILDING. THEY'VE ADDED A PICKLE BOARD COURT ALONG AREA FOR THE CHILDREN, UM PAVILION WITH GRILL. AND THEN A. UH SMALL BUILDING FOR MAINTENANCE. SO TO GO OVER THE FOUR CHANGES SINCE THE FIRST READING AS I MENTIONED, BUILDING FIVE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SITE PLAN, LEAVING ONLY FOR THE BUILDING'S REDUCING THE TOLD NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 1 96 TO 1 72. DENSITY DECREASED FROM 29.4722. JUST A REMINDER THAT OUR COM PLAN ALLOWS UP TO 11.62 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE BY RIGHT FOR THE OFFICE, RESIDENTIAL LAND USE AND UP TO 30 DWELLING UNITS WITH YOUR APPROVAL. AFRICANS INCREASE THE OPEN SPACE FROM 27 TO 32. THE SITE, WHICH EXCEEDS THE 30% PEUT OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT AGAIN. THIS WAS AS A RESULT OF THE REMOVAL OF BUILDING. FIVE THEY'VE INCREASED PARKING FROM 2 99 TO 303. REDUCTION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REMOVAL OF BUILDING FIVE UH, THIS RAISED THE RATIO FROM 1.321 POINT 76 PACES PER UNIT. RECENT BEAUTIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED AT A RATIO OF 1.6 PARKING SPACES ON AVERAGE. ALSO THE MEDIAN ALONG CENTRAL PARKWAY HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO ALLOW FOR LEFT TURNS. IF YOU REMEMBER IT WAS RIGHT OUT HOMELY FOR EACH SIDE, CAUSING SOMEONE THAT WANTED TO GO IN THE OTHER DIRECTION. T O HAVE TO U TURN. SO THE MEDIA HAS BEEN OPEN TO ALLOW FOR THE LEFT HAND TURN LANE LEFT HAND TURNS.

THIS IS A MAP OF CENTRAL PARKWAY. THE LOSS NORTH AND SOUTH. THIS IS JUST TO SHOW FOR THE WILL BE EXTENSION. HOW MUCH CONSERVATION. LAND IS ON EACH SIDE OF THE EXTENSION, AT LEAST ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CENTRAL PARK WAY THAT WILL BE CONSERVATION IN PERPETUITY.

THEN, OF COURSE, THAT CONNECTION THROUGH THE COUNTY TO THE SOUTH. WHERE THERE'S CURRENTLY UM MOSTLY MOBILE HOME UNITS. SO WE'VE WE'VE GOTTEN INFORMATION FROM THE COUNTIES WEBSITE THAT TALKED ABOUT THE THREE YEAR PLAN FOR THE WILL OF THE EXTENSION. MOST OF THESE MONIES I BELIEVE HAVE HAVE BEEN SLATED. KIND OF HAVE LEAST SLATED FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT OF THE STUDY FOR THE PROJECT. UM. AND I BELIEVE THAT THE FIVE MILLION IS MM. IT'S JUST ALLOCATED FOR THAT STUDY AND COMPLETION OF THE ROADWAY EXTENSION. WITH THAT STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 61 2021 WITH CONDITIONS. THAT THAT ENDS STAFFS PRESENT PACE PRESENTATION AND OPEN FOR QUESTIONS. HAVE YOU BEST INTERN OR THE CONDITIONS OR YOU'VE READ THEM AND LOOKED AT THEM ALREADY, OR DID YOU NEED? YES THE CONDITION THAT THE 20 UNITS WILL REMAIN IN PERPETUITY. DOES EXIST. ATTAINABLE HOUSING, AFFORDABLE WORKFORCE HOUSING. AFTER YOU GIVE YOUR EVIDENCE ABOUT IT. SO DOES THE PETITIONER HAVE ANY TESTIMONY OR NEED TO CALL IN THE WITNESSES? SCAM BLUR. THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING, MADAM ERIC COMMISSIONER'S STAFF. WE DO HAVE A PRESENTATION. CAN I HAVE THE WINTER AND UM. FOR WHILE YOU PUT THAT UP. I JUST WANT CLARIFICATION THAT THE CONDITION IS TO STILL MAINTAIN. 10% AFFORDABLE HOUSING, BUT IT WAS ALWAYS IT ACTUALLY STAYS AT 20 UNITS. THE PERCENTAGE CHANGED A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE OF THE DROP IN UNITS. OKAY WE WORD IT INCREASES FROM 11 IF FOR STAYING WITH THE 20 UNITS. IT INCREASES TO 11.62% OF THE PROJECT. THAT'S NEWS TO US BECAUSE I ARE OUR COMMITMENT IN THE CONDITION WAS TOO MAINTAINED TO GO TO ENSURE THAT THE 10% OF THE UNITS WERE MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY. IT

[02:20:01]

WENT FROM 10 YEARS TOO. PERPETUITY AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS FROM. LAST HEARING.

WE CAN GO THROUGH IT, BUT. THANK YOU, MISS CAMPBELL. SO, UM THANK YOU. JUST, UM. I GUESS THAT JUST WE WANT TO BRING TO YOU THE CHANGES THAT WE HAVE MADE SINCE FIRST HEARING FROM MEETING WITH YOU ALL WE'VE MET WITH. RESIDENTS WE HAVE MATT WITH THE INTERVENER PRIOR TO HIM, BECOMING AN INTERVENER. A FEW. AGAIN SLIDES TO SHOW YOU HOW THIS PROJECT HAS IMPROVED, THANKS TO THE PUBLIC PROCESS ON BEN A FEW POINTS OF CLARIFICATION. I DIDN'T SAY MY NAME MARCELLA CAMPBELL OR. HONOR REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE APPLICANT. I KNOW OUR APPLICANT IS ATTENDING THE ASSUME HE COULDN'T FLY IN BECAUSE OF THE STORM. ALL THE AIRPORTS FLIGHTS WERE CANCELED. ONE IMPORTANT POINT OF CLARIFICATION IS THAT THIS PROJECT IS NOT A REZONING.

IT IS NOT A LAND USE AMENDMENT. IT IS ALREADY AN ART BEAUTY AND THE PROCESS THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH IS AN AMENDMENT OF AN EXISTING ARE PEUT. IT WAS APPROVED WITH AN EXPIRED TIMELINE. I THINK THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT POSITIONS US SLIGHTLY DIFFERENTLY WITHIN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND I UNDERSTAND. UM, YOU KNOW, I'VE TALKED TO THE TO THE RESIDENTS. YOU KNOW, WE UNDERSTAND HOW HARD IT IS TO SUDDENLY HAVE. SOMETHING APPEAR NEXT TO YOU A SURPRISE A LAND USE CHANGE THE LAND USE HERE DIDN'T CHANGE A ZONING CHANGE. THE ZONING HERE DIDN'T CHANGE. THIS WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND FIVE THIS APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY IN SEPTEMBER. OF 2020. SO, UM. IT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND GRANTED. THE BOARD HAS CONTAINED WHEN YOU DO AN APPLICATION OR AN AMENDMENT TO IN OUR BEAUTY, THE CONDITIONS OF THAT PURITY IT'S THE BOARD'S PLEASURE, BUT OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED. THAT MED CODE AND CALM PLAN SINCE 2000 AND FIVE CHANCES ARE THAT THAT IS A SIGHT. THAT IS NOT ALLOCATED AS A PARK IN PERPETUITY, WHERE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY IN PERPETUITY. THIS HAS BEEN THERE FOR A LONG TIME. AS YOU CAN SEE. PROPERTY SURROUNDING THIS FACE AGAIN. THIS AH LOT OF THIS. MY PRESENTATION IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT THAN I WOULD NORMALLY DO. IN A SECOND HEARING BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT WE WANT TO ADDRESS. SOME OF THE FACTS THAT ARE OR OPINIONS THAT ARE BEING PRESENT. THROUGH THE THROUGH THE INTERVENING PROCESS.

PROPERTY IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL BEAUTIES. RESIDENTIAL BEAUTY.

STAFF MENTIONED THAT CIVIC OPEN SPACE WHICH. IS IN MY OPINION. I DON'T KNOW STUFF. I CHECKED IT. IT'S THE LARGEST PASSIVE PARK IN THE CITY BRIGHT CLOSEST TO THE LEAST AMOUNT OF RESIDENTS, BUT IT IS OUR LARGEST PASSIVE PARK. THEN DIRECTLY CONNECTED. TO A VERY INTERESTING AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE TO THE NORTH. MENTIONED, UM. THIS PROJECT WAS APPROVED AT THE L P A. AND NOT BECAUSE RESIDENTS WHEN WE'RE NOT BEING HEARD IT WAS APPROVED BECAUSE IT MEANS COM PLAN AND IT WAS APPROVED BECAUSE IT MEANS THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND IT WAS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN MAD. IT WAS APPROVED AT FIRST READING OF THE CITY COMMISSION WITH AGAIN THE CONDITION. THAT THE HOUSING UNITS BE PROVIDED WITHOUT A 10 YEAR. SUNSET. NOT THAT THE PERSON THE NUMBER OF UNITS CHANGE. UM, SITE PLAN, BUT I'M GOING TO ZOOM INTO THE SITE PLAN A LITTLE MORE. I CAN DO THE POINTER. A STAFF MENTIONED. THE LAYOUT OF THE BUILDINGS HAS REMAINED THE SAME. THERE USED TO BE A BUILDING BUILDING FIVE RIGHT HERE. UM. THE EPA HAD MENTIONED REDUCING DENSITY COMMISSIONER. MCDONALD YOU PUSHED VERY HARD AND THE APPLICANT HEARD YOU. AND COMMISSIONER MATHIS AND YOU PUSHED VERY HARD TO HAVE GREEN AT THE FOOT. OR OR AT THE BEGINNING OF THE GREEN THAT DUGGAN CONNECTS TO PUBLICAN CREEK AND. YOU KNOW, MAYOR CLARKE, YOU WANTED MORE OPEN SPACE AND AMENITIES ON THE NORTHERN SIDE, AND SO ELIMINATING THAT BUILDING HAS ALLOWED. FOR DENSITY TO BE REDUCED PARKING TO BE INCREASED, OPEN SPACE TO BE INCREASED STORMWATER TO BE INCREASED, YOU KNOW, AND THEN ADDITION OF.

INCREASED RECREATIONAL AMENITIES ON THE NORTHERN SIDE, WHICH DIDN'T ORIGINALLY EXIST.

[02:25:03]

NO. THIS IS ALSO BEING. DESCRIBED AS A FOUR STORY PROJECT. IT SAYS FOUR BUILDINGS. UM. THAT ART THAT STEP 23 STORIES ON EACH END OF THE BUILDING. THERE'S A TWO STORY COMPONENT. LONG CENTRAL PARKWAY, SO IT IS A VERY ARTICULATED PROJECT. AH LINED ALONG A PUBLIC CENTRAL STREET, SO THE PROJECT RESPONDS. AND ENHANCES CENTRAL PARKWAY. IT FRONTS IT. IT IMPROVES THE ADDRESS, AND IT CREATES A NEW STREET. A NEW ADDRESS. IT IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC THAT IS OPEN TO EVERYONE. MENTIONED DENSITY WAS REDUCED BY 13. FROM 196 272 THAT PUTS THIS PROJECT AT 23.3 MARKET RATE UNITS, THE REMAINDER OF THE UNITS THAT 10% ADDITIONAL THAT TAKES IT TO 25. 0.8. THERE'S AFFORDABLE UNITS. THIS IS THE PROJECT THAT HAS OFFERED THE LARGEST PERCENTAGEET PROPOSING TO PAY OR EXCHANGE. THE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE EXACTLY THE SAME. IT WAS A CONDITION IN ONE OF THE HEARINGS THAT. NOT ALL BE LIMITED TO ONE BEDROOMS. IT'S THE SAME PERCENTAGES A ZOO PROJECT HAS THREE BEDROOMS AND TWO BEDROOMS AND ONE BEDROOMS. THE UNITS WILL NOT LOOK ANY DIFFERENT. AND THEN THE MARKET RATE UNITS. UM PARKING HAS NOW. INCREASED TO THE AVERAGE THE WAY YOUR STAFF CALCULATES THIS 1.76, WHICH IS HIGHER THAN ALL YOU KNOW THE BEAUTIES THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED, LILLIAN. WELL, I KNOW, COMMISSIONER, MY DEAR, YOU'RE NOT IN THE BUSINESS OF HOUSING CARS. I MEAN, IT'S STILL PRETTY SUSTAINABLE. WE'RE NOT. REALLY THROWING OFF BALANCE THE AMOUNT OF PARKING WITH THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT. IT WAS ASKED TO INCREASE AMENITIES ON THE NORTHERN SIDE TO IMPROVE THE CROSSING. CAN WITH THIS APPLICANT IS DOING WITH A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OUT OF YOU KNOW? PRIVATE FUNDS IS AN IMPROVING. PUBLIC ROAD MUCH THE SAME WAY THAT WE'VE DONE AND WE'VE USED PUBLIC FUNDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ALL OF OUR OTHER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS AND WE'LL GET TO THAT IN A SECOND. THERE WAS A REQUEST OF INCREASED LANDSCAPING AND THAT WAS DONE. I'LL SHOW YOU THAT IN THE SECOND. AGAIN MAINTAINING THE WORK THE WORKFORCE HOUSING AND PERPETUITY. YOU CAN SEE AND, UH, HIS CLOSE UP. OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. I MEAN, THE LANDSCAPING THAT HAS BEEN ACCOMMODATED ON THIS. IS ABOVE AND BEYOND. I MEAN, IT'S REALLY EXTENSIVE, UM NOT ONLY. IS IT EVIDENT FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLAN? THAT WE MEET LANDSCAPE CODE. THE LPD REQUESTED THAT THOSE BEING MORE MATURE TREES, MORE SHADE TREES, ALL THAT HAS BEEN INCORPORATED. HERE'S THE VIEW OF THE PROJECT. IS YOU? CAN SEE THE THREE STORIES STEPPING OUT TO FOUR LOOKING SOUTH. I HAVE TO SAY THAT THESE THREE D RENDERINGS OR NOT ABSOLUTELY TRUE TO THE TYPE OF PLANTS, ON BE PRECISE LOCATION AND REALITY. I MEAN, IT WAS TOO LATE TO GET THE RENDER TO CHANGE THESE, BUT THESE AIR REALLY SHORT, THEY'RE PROBABLY GONNA BE TALLER AND JUST COVER MORE OF THE TOP AND LESS OF THE BOTTOM. UM HOWEVER, LOOKING NORTH, THERE'S A BIG TRIANGLE. THERE'S A LARGE PIECE RIGHT HERE. WAY JUST HEAVILY LANDSCAPED IN THIS AREA, AND THE BUILDINGS ARE SET BACK. SO BETWEEN THE TWO STORY BUILDING ON ONE SIDE AND THE SETBACK BUILDINGS ON THE OTHER SIDE. UM PRECEDENT AND IN A SMALL FRIEND ON CENTRAL PARKWAY. IT'S NOT AN OUT OF SCALE BUILDING. THIS IS THAT CENTRAL PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED ADDRESS PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE THAT THE PROJECT IS CREATING ON DITKA NEXT NORTH TO SOUTH. JUST A LITTLE BIT OF THE HISTORY AND AGAIN I UNDERSTAND IT'S. IT'S HARD TO SEE OR TO IMAGINE THAT YOU WAS A COMMISSION ARE APPROVING SOMETHING JUST OUT OF THE BLUE.

I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT STAFF MENTIONED THERE WAS. PD APPROVED IN 2000 AND. FIVE THIS IS THE BEAUTY THAT WAS APPROVED BACK THEN. IT HAD TO. LARGE U SHAPED BUILDINGS. UM WE OVER LAID. CURRENT PROJECT. SO THIS IS WHAT THE CURRENT FOOTPRINT IS. YOU CAN SEE THE INCREMENTAL,

[02:30:01]

SMALLER THE BUILDING'S AIR, FURTHER SAID BACK FROM WHAT WAS THE PROPERTY LINE. UM THE MASSING YOU WILL SEE NOW IS SMALLER AS WELL. SO A SIMPLE SKETCH UP DIAGRAM. IT TAKES THE APPROVED. YOU. D THIS IS ONE OF THE TWO APPROVED BUILDINGS VERSUS ONE OF OUR FOUR APPROVED BUILDINGS. WHEN YOU PUT THEM SIDE BY SIDE AGAIN. UM. OUR CITY'S REGULATIONS ALLOW FOR THIS AND THEY ALLOW FOR THIS. AND IF WE DON'T LIKE WHAT THEY ALLOWED, I'M ALL FOR WORKING WITH THE CITY'S I HAVE WITH YOU FOR MANY YEARS TO WORK ON. WHAT? YOU KNOW WHAT IS BETTER, BUT RIGHT NOW, THIS IS WITHIN THE CONFINES OF WHAT OUR REGULATIONS ALLOW. AND SO WE'VE TRIED TO BREAK IT DOWN. WE'VE TRIED TO MAKE IT A LITTLE MORE ORGANIC. TRIED TO SCALE IT DOWN. A BIG PART OF IT IS THE FACT THAT WE'RE NOT HAVING THESE ROOFS AND TOWERING ELEMENTS THAT ALLOW THE BUILDING TO GO UP TO 60 FT, WHICH IS ALSO PART OF CODE. UM REGARDING DENSITY. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT. I THINK THIS IS ONE OF TWO TIMES WHERE I'M GOING TO MAKE REFERENCE TO THE DOCUMENTS THAT THE INTERVENER SUBMITTED AND IT WAS PART OF THE AGENDA.

UM, THERE WAS MENTIONED TOL, EH? A PETITION SIGNED BY 200 PEOPLE. AND EMPHASIS ON THE FACT THAT THE TITLE SAID MIND YOU, THIS IS NOT AH, PETITION AGAINST DEVELOPMENT. IT'S THE PETITION NOT TO GO OVER. 15 UNITS TO THE ACRE AND THE PETITION THEN SITES. UM. A SECTION OF YOUR CODE. AND THE. THE SECTION THAT ITS SITE IS THIS ONE. NOW THE TITLE ERRONEOUSLY POINTS TO THIS SECTION. IT POINTS TO RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY. UNDER YOUR GENERAL. THIS PROPERTY IS OUR BEAUTY. AND IT'S 30. SO, UM, A LITTLE BIT MISLEADING OR ERRONEOUS ON WHAT THE REPRESENTATION OF THAT WASN'T. AGAIN. THIS DOESN'T MEAN UNDER LAND USE THAT EVERYBODY IS ENTITLED 30 UNITS TO THE ACRE. YOUR STAFF JUST CLARIFIED THAT.

UM, BUT THIS COMMISSION AND STAFF AND THE CITY HAS ESTABLISHED A PROCESS TO ALLOW THE BOARD TO WEIGH IN. WHETHER YOU KNOW A NAP LICK, UNT HAS DONE ENOUGH PUBLIC BENEFIT. TO WARRANT. INCREASE OR NOT THE INCREASE, BUT THE DENSITY THAT IS CLEARLY STATED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM, THE PROCESS. WE HAVE TODAY TO DETERMINE THAT TO NOT BE IMPARTIAL TO NOT CHANGE THE RULES. EVERY TIME SOMEONE COMES IN FRONT OF YOU IS A LIST OF ABOUT 23. AMENITIES AS IT'S CALLED ON. BENNETT SAYS THAT THE LAST ONE IS CALLED OTHER IN CASE YOU HAVE SOME MORE. WE'VE WE'VE BEEN THROUGH THESE IN R L P A. IN THE FIRST HEARING. I'M NOT GOING TO GO WITH WRONG BUT OUT OF THE 26 ON THIS LIST. THESE ARE THE APPLICANT. I THINK IT'S EXCUSE ME 25 ON THIS LIST. 19 ARE BEING PROVIDED. THE SIX NOT PROVIDED THREE OR NOT APPLICABLE. THERE'S NO HISTORIC BUILDINGS HERE. THERE'S NO WETLANDS, AND ALSO THERE'S NO MONEY PROVIDED TOWARDS A HOUSING FUND BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS IN FACT PROVIDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. S O THINGS LIKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AND JOB CREATION AND THE LAND DONATION. NOW, SOME MAY SAY, WELL, THE LAND WASN'T REALLY DONATED. IT WAS SOLD. YES, IT WAS A VOLUNTARY SALE. NOW THERE'S STILL SECTIONS OF WILLOUGHBY WHERE THAT HASN'T HAPPENED. WE'RE NOT EVERYBODY WANTS TO SELL, WHERE SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE IT. GOING THROUGH AN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCESS WILL PROBABLY BE MORE BENEFICIAL. AND SO THERE'S AN EMERGENCY GENERATOR BEING PROVIDED IN THE IN THE CLUBHOUSE. CLUBHOUSE IS BEING DESIGNED AS A SHELTER IN PLACE. BUILDING, WHICH IS IMPORTANT, NOT JUST FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY, BUT FOR OTHERS IN THE AREA AS WELL. ANYWAYS WE CAN. WE CAN GO THROUGH ALL OF THOSE. I THINK WE'VE DONE THEM BEFORE AND IN AN EFFORT. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE IF YOU HAVE THEM. IN AN EFFORT TO KEEP THIS PRESENTATION SHORT. I'LL JUST KEEP MOVING. THERE'S ALSO BEEN DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA WHERE THIS PROJECT IS BEING PROPOSED. THIS. PROJECT IS BEING PROPOSED A DISTRICT THAT IS SURROUNDED BY OUR ONLY TWO LINES OF MASS TRANSIT. GOOD, BAD, FULL BUS,

[02:35:04]

EMPTY BUS. THE BEGINNING OF WHAT IS. COMMUNITIES MASS TRANSIT. IT IS AN IN FULL SIGHT.

THIS IS NOT AN ANNEXATION THAT THIS IS NOT SOME SOMEWHERE OUT ON THE FRINGES OF TOWN. IT IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY FULLY DEVELOPED. LOTS THE STRETCH OF CENTRAL PARKWAY GOES FROM SCANNER. TO THE WEST TO US ONE TO THE EAST. THAT'S A MILE LONG STRETCH. ALONG THAT MILE. THERE ARE 21 PARCELS. THIS IS APPLICANTS PARCEL. TWO OF THOSE PARCELS ARE ALREADY MULTI FAMILY ARE BEAUTY. UM THERE'S CONDOMINIUMS RIGHT HERE. AND BE APPROVED WITH EXPIRED TIMELINE MULTIFAMILY PROJECT HERE. THERE'S THE PARK. 16 OF THOSE PROPERTIES ALONG THIS OUR COMMERCIAL OR CIVIC. UM, REALLY, NO OTHER CONNECTIONS TO ANY OTHER OF THESE RESIDENTIAL, WHICH, BY THE WAY, MAYBE THEY SHOULD HAPPEN, GIVEN THAT WE HAVE THE BIGGEST PARK PASSIVE PARK IN THE AREA. THERE'S ONLY ONE CONNECTION OUTSIDE OF THIS QUARTER, AND THAT'S TO MONTEREY AND THAT'S ALSO REALLY THROUGH COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES ON BOTH SIDES. THEN THERE'S TWO GATED SUBDIVISIONS GATED PRESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS ALONG THIS DURING THE LAST HEARING. UM THERE WAS CONCERN RAISED BY RESIDENTS ABOUT ONE OF THESE COMMUNITIES HAVING THEIR PEOPLE PARK OVER AT THE PARK. AND WHILE I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT COULD BE A CONCERN, I KNOW THAT IS AN H AWAY. IT IS A LOT HARDER TO TOW. IT IS A LOT HARDER TO CONTROL PARKING. THOSE OF US WHO HAVE BEEN PART OF A CHOICE. I UNDERSTAND HOW HARD IT IS. DO IT PRIVATELY. BUT THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE, UM, A NATURE AWAY. THIS IS A MANAGED. HIGH END APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WITH. FULL TIME STAFF WHERE IF THERE IS NO PARKING, OR IF THERE'S PARKING PROBLEMS THEY CAN ADDRESS YOU KNOW THEIR LANDLORD AND THE ON STAFF PEOPLE RIGHT HERE. I'LL LEAVE IT TO THE CITY, YOU KNOW. TWO. ADDRESS ILLEGAL PARKING. I MEAN THOSE OF US WHO WORK HERE DOWNTOWN. WE KNOW THAT WE DON'T GO OVER THREE HOURS. UM ARE WE PAY FOR IT RIGHT? UM. THERE WAS TALK ABOUT THE CHARACTER AGAIN. THIS IS NOT TO DIMINISH THE AREA, BUT IT'S TO ESTABLISH THAT THIS WAS ALWAYS ENVISIONED AS A COMMERCIAL AND MULTI FAMILY. FOR DISTRICT WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY, AND SO WHEN YOU COME IN FROM THE EAST. UM THERE'S AH COMMERCIAL, THE BACK END OF THE SHOPPING PLAZA THAT IS ALONG US ONE. AND AN AUTO DEALER PARTS. UM. WHEN YOU COME IN FROM THE WEST, THERE'S A TWO STORY. COMMERCIAL BUILDING. I BELIEVE A SCHOOL IS MOVING AND TAKING OVER SOME OF THE SPACE. AND THEN THERE'S A FOUR STORY MASONRY MODERN BUILDING ON THE OTHER END. LIKE I SAID, I'M NOT GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE REST OF THE CHARACTER AND SHOWING.

MAJORITY OF THOSE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, BUT THIS IS WHAT IS DIRECTLY NEXT TO THIS PIECE. TO THE EAST. THIS IS THE VIEW FROM THE SOUTHERNMOST PART OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY. FROM THE NORTHERN PART OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE NEIGHBORS DIRECTLY. TO THE EAST. THE NEIGHBORS TO THE WEST. THERE'S AN 80 FT RIGHT AWAY. 30 FT, WHICH CAME FROM THIS PROPERTY, 50 FT. WHICH I BELIEVE CAME FROM THE DEVELOPER OF THE. SEASIDE RIGHT AT THE TIME. IT'S UNDERSTANDABLE WHY THE COMMUNITY THAT IS AFTER THAT, A THOSE 80 FT, WHICH I BELIEVE IS SEASIDE IS COMPLETELY WALLED IN BECAUSE IT IS, YOU KNOW ITS FLANKS. A NADIE FOOT DIVIDED HIGHWAY ON ONE SIDE. POTENTIALLY ANOTHER 80 FT DIVIDED CORRIDOR ON THE OTHER SIDE AND LOGICALLY INTERNALIZED ITS DEVELOPMENT. AGAIN. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT DEVELOPER KNEW BECAUSE HE DONATED. PART OF THE LAND OR SOLD FOR THIS PROJECT AS WELL.

UM THAT THE INTERVENERS. PRESENTATION MENTIONS INCONSISTENCY WITH POLICY A 52 STAFFS REPORT. OUTLINES. THAT THERE IS CONSISTENCY WITH POLICY, A FIVE TO AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IN FACT, THERE'S NOT A SINGLE POLICY IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT THIS PROJECT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH HAS LISTED AND STAFFS REPORT. UM. THESE ARE NOT

[02:40:07]

CONCERNS THAT WERE RAISED BY THE BOARD. BUT AGAIN, THEY WERE RIGHT RAISED BY RESIDENTS AND RESIDENT COMMENTS THAT WE JUST WANTED TO HELP. POSSIBLY WITH SOME FACTS. CENTRAL PARK. RIGHT PARKWAY. EXCUSE ME, IS DESIGNED TO HANDLE 1530 TRIPS. AND THESE ARE PEAK DIRECTION. PICK OUR TRIPS. RIGHT NOW. IT IS A 13% CAPACITY. HAD BILLED OUT CENTRAL PARK PARK WE LOST WILL ADD 169 TRIPS, WHICH WILL TAKE IT CLOSE TO 20% CAPACITY AT PEAK HOUR. TAKE DIRECTION. UH, THIS NUMBER 169 WE ASKED, ARE ENGINEERED TO BE CONSERVATIVE. SO HE ADDED, 34 MORE TRIPS THAN WHAT THE ACTUAL COUNTS WERE SAYING. LET ME TELL YOU, EVEN WHEN THIS IS BUILT OUT, THERE'S TWO PARCELS LEFT ON CENTRAL PARKWAY. AGAIN. THIS THIS IS COMPLETELY BLOCKED OFF FROM EVERYTHING ELSE. THERE'S ONE PARCEL THAT IS 1.6 ACRES. THERE'S ONE PARCEL THAT IS 4.48 ACRES, EVEN IF THOSE PARCELS GET DEVELOPED AT WHATEVER MAXIMUM THIS COMMISSION EVER THINKS IS APPROPRIATE. THERE'S NO CHANCE THIS ROAD EVER GOES OVER 25% CAPACITY, WHICH COULD OPEN A WHOLE NEW DISCUSSION AS IT IS IT TOO WIDE. AND SHOULD WE HAVE. DESIGNED IT SOME A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY, BUT THIS IS IMPORTANT WHEN IT COMES TO AMOUNTS OF TRAFFIC AND THE OVERCAPACITY AND WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO WITH ALL THE TRIPS? SPEED SPEED WAS BROUGHT UP. I HAVE TO SAY THAT I TOOK THIS PICTURE MAKE MADE A U TURN TOOK ANOTHER PICTURE CAME BACK TO CANNOT. THERE WASN'T A SINGLE CAR WHILE I DID ALL THIS. MAYBE IT WAS THE TIME OF THE DAY. BUT THIS IS A POSTED 25 MILE IN OUR QUARTER. AS YOU MOVE WEST. THERE'S A SECTION IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL. AND NOW THE SCHOOL HAS MOVED OVER TO AGAIN TO THE CORNER NEAR CANNER THAT IS POSTED EVERY DAY. 20 MILES AN HOUR FOR SOMETIME IN THE MORNING AND SOMETIME IN THE AFTERNOON, AND I'M HOPING THAT WITHOUT ANY BARRIERS, PEOPLE ARE RESPECTING THESE RULES, BUT WE'VE BEEN THERE IN THE CITY. WE'VE BEEN THERE. I'VE I'VE BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH AND WORKED IN PROJECTS LIKE. EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD, ALWAYS POSTED AT 30 MILES AN HOUR WHEN WE'VE DONE STREET DIETS WHERE WE HAVE DONE IMPROVEMENTS AND MADE THE MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY AND MADE THE CROSSINGS EASIER. WE'VE DONE THAT, AND I REMEMBER CROSSING WITH MY KIDS IS BABIES FROM FROM POTSDAM AREA ONTO THE KIWANIS PARK WHEN THAT WAS FIVE LANES AND. NO. AND THIS IS A 30 MILE AN HOUR POSTED CITY NOW WHAT THIS PROJECT IS DOING AGAIN WITH PRIVATE FUNDS. IS THE BEGINNING. THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'RE DONE FOR EAST OCEAN AND THE BEGINNING OF THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'RE DONE FOR COLORADO, TAKING THE 80 FT. PUTTING A LANDSCAPE A PLANTING STRIP BETWEEN A WIDER SIDEWALK AND THE TWO TRAVEL LANES, INCREASING THE MEDIANS.

INCREASING LANDSCAPING AS WE MENTIONED SLIGHTLY RAISING. THE SECTION IN BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS. CALMING TRAFFIC, CREATING A MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT. I KNOW THAT ONE OF THE CONDITIONS IS WE HAD MENTIONED DOING FAVORS. IN THAT SECTION, AND YOU ARE UTILITIES. DEPARTMENT WANTS TO DIE THERE BE STAMPED CONCRETE OR COLORED CONCRETE, WHICH WE HAVE SAID. EYES. FINE IT'S OKAY. WE UNDERSTAND THAT MAINTENANCE. IS A CONCERN. JUST A FEW MORE IMAGES. THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ENCLOSING, UM, STAFF RECOMMENDATION. UH WHERE THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE OLD ERS. BUT ALL OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE BEEN MATT AND THEY RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT. TO ALLOW. FOUR STORY BUILDINGS WITH 172 MINUTES NOW, LIKE I SAID, MAYBE I MISSED IT. THE FACT THAT WHICH WE SWITCH FROM THE 10% THAT WE WERE BRINGING FORWARD TO A FIXED NUMBER OF UNITS, BUT WE WOULD LIKE IT TO REMAIN A 10. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. UM UM, CITY ATTORNEY. IF YOU PLEASE OFFICIALLY TELL US THAT WE HAVE AH. INTERVENER. MAYBE, AND IF THEY HAVE, IF THEY DID STAND UP AND OKAY, SO FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH, UM PROCEDURALLY, OBVIOUSLY OUR STAFF PUT ON A PRESENTATION. THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS BY ANYBODY. NOW MARCELLA HAS PUT ON THE PRESENTATION, BUT SHE'S TECHNICALLY. NOT AN EXPERT TESTIFYING UNDER OATH, BUT SHE'S PRESENTING THE PROJECT. WE COULD TREAT THAT AS AN OPENING STATEMENT. BECAUSE

[02:45:04]

TECHNICALLY THE INTERVENERS NOT IN A POSITION TO ASK MARCELLA QUESTIONS UNLESS YOU GUYS ARE ASKING HER QUESTIONS BASED UPON HER PRESENTATION. OR. WE CAN TREAT IT. BUT YOU GUYS ASK YOUR QUESTIONS AND KNOW THAT THE INTERVENER ASK YOUR QUESTIONS. OR WE CAN LET THE INTERVENER GIVE A BRIEF STATEMENT. OR WE CAN HAVE THE APPLICANT GIVE THEIR WHOLE PRESENTATION. AND THEN AT THE END, BUT THE INTERVENER GIVE HIS PRESENTATION. WHATEVER IS BEST SUITED FOR YOU GUYS. MISS GAMBLER, YOU WERE DONE. YES, YES. DONE FROM THE INTERVIEW.

SO IF YOU GUYS HAVE NO QUESTIONS FOR MARCELA, THEN WE COULD HEAR FROM THE INTERVENER.

WILL HAVE QUESTIONS FOR HER. BUT WE'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE INTERVENER AND THEN WE'LL HAVE QUESTIONS. OKAY WELL, HE HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE QUESTIONS HE BEFORE HE GOES, HE CAN ASK BEFORE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE GONNA CALL MARCELLO BACK UP FOR QUESTIONS OR NOT SO. SAYING THAT YOU'RE NOT ASKING YOUR KNEE NOW I HAVE TO GIVE THE. OPTION TO THE INTERVENER TOE.

ASK HER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MYSELF, YOU KNOW, DOING A QUALIFIED AND HAS DONE WHAT HE NEEDS TO DO. YES I HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS FOR MARCELLA. BUT IF. PLEASURES TO HAVE THE INTERVENER ASKED MR LAMBERT. IMPORTANT. WELL, WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOUR LESSON? WAIT, WAIT, WAIT. LAID SOME LAMBERT. SORRY. NO. SAM. YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE FOR THE APPLICANT. WHERE DO YOU HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION. UNDERSTOOD. I WANTED TO GIVE MY POWERPOINT PRESENTATION AND ASKED THE STUFF QUESTION. SOME HOTEL. ARE WE ON THE RIGHT TRACK? SURE.

THANK YOU.

SURE THIS WORKS. RIGHT? WE'LL MAKE SURE YOU SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE SMOKING AREA. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. BEFORE I GET STARTED FOR PRESENTATION. I JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE CITY OF STUART TORTO. COMMISSIONERS THAT MAYOR VICE MAYOR MYSELF AS WELL AS MR MICHAEL STRETCH WHO YOU GUYS MET WITH IT IS. WELL I JUST WANNA THANK YOU FOR TAKING TIME OFF YOUR BUSY SCHEDULES TO MEET WITH US AND MICHAEL WANT WANTED ME TO REMIND YOU THAT HE IS NOT A RETIRED CIVIL ENGINEER. HE IS BUSY ON GRANDPA DUTY, SO I'LL LET YOU GUYS DECIDE. UM MS CANDLE THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMUNICATION, MR MARTELL. THANK YOU. FREE COMMUNICATION.

MR REED'S MR FREEMAN. THANK YOU FOR COMMUNICATION. UM. I'D LIKE TO START OFF WITH JUST SOME COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF. I JUST I GUESS I HAVE ONE COMMENT. REGARDING WHAT MISS CAMPBELL? ER SAID, AND I APOLOGIZE, MS CAMPBELL. ER DON. I'M NOT SURE WHERE YOU'RE AT.

THANK YOU FOR MEETING WITH ME AS WELL. AND WELL, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE YOUR COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. OKAY? UM. MY COMMENTS WERE ASSED FAR AS WHAT MISS CAMPBELL MENTIONED A ZAFAR IF WE LOOK BACK TO THE ONLINE AGENDA FOR THE EPA, IT STATES THAT THE AFRICAN IS LOOKING FOR VARIANCES FOR 2.7. 0.0 D THREE DENSITY, SO THAT'S WHAT I WENT OFF OF FOR MY PETITION. THAT'S THE INFORMATION I WAS ON THE LPS AGENDA ON FEBRUARY 11TH. I NOW HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. MR REID'S MR FREEMAN. IT APPEARS FROM ATTACHMENT EIGHT TO EXHIBIT D AND FROM ATTACHING D THREE RENDERINGS THAT THERE ARE 10 PARALLEL PARKING SPOTS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CENTRAL PARKWAY FOR WESTBOUND TRAFFIC AND SIX PARALLEL PARKING SPOTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CENTRAL PARKWAY FOR EASTBOUND TRAFFIC. ARE MY NUMBERS CORRECT? 16 TOTAL. YEAH. UM. UH IN ATTACHMENT A TO EXHIBIT D. I WASN'T ABLE TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHAT THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT WAS. IT'S VERY, VERY HIGHEST POINT, WAS IT. 45 OR 52 FT, HONESTLY. IT'S. THAT APPLICATION IS NOT SOMETHING THAT THE CITY STAFF PREPARED. SO IF YOU'RE GONNA BE ASKING THEM TO VERIFY THE APPLICANTS. APPLICATION I'D RATHER HAVE A MEMBER OF THE REPRESENTATIVE.

THE APPLICANT ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS. I DON'T HAVE A STRONG WITH YOU ASKING, UNDERSTOOD, BUT MARCEL, IF WE COULD HAVE SOMEBODY COME TAKE THE MICROPHONE. AND TIME. CAN YOU GIVE HER A SEAT OR SOMEBODY UP THERE JUST SO THAT SHE CAN ANSWER BECAUSE I DON'T WANT THE CITY TO BE BOUND BY THOSE ANSWERS AS MUCH OF THE APPLICANT UNDERSTOOD. YES, MISS CAMPBELL, ER. WHAT I WAS ASKING WASN'T ATTACHMENT EIGHT TO EXHIBIT D. I WASN'T ABLE TO

[02:50:04]

FIGURE OUT WHETHER THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AT THE VERY HIGHEST POINT WAS GONNA BE 45 OR 52. FT AND WHICH IS CORRECT. SO THE BUILDING IS 45 FT. TALL WHICH IS WHAT THE CODE ALLOWS IN. THE CODE ALSO ALLOWS FOR PARAPETS. YOU GO OVER THAT, AND THERE'S CERTAIN AREAS WHERE THE PARAPETS GO OVER TO EITHER CAUGHT COVER AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT OR BECAUSE THEY'RE PART OF A STAIRCASE. THE HABITABLE. BLOCKS OF THE BUILDING IS 45 FT. AND THERE'S THE PARAPETS. VERY UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU. BY THE WAY, UM, THE CITY CODE ALLOWS THE PARAPETS TO GO UP TO 60 FT. UNDERSTOOD. NOT THE PARAPETS, THE ROOF AND TOWERS AND ALL OF THAT STUFF.

MR REID'S UM. DON'T MAYBE DISCUSSION BEFORE MS CAMPBELL. IN ATTACHMENT. SEE TWO APPLICANTS. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS. MS. CAMPBELL REMARKS THAT QUOTE OF NOTE AS. AS WELL AS THE FACT THAT THE PREVIOUS STUNNING SIGHT WAS CPD. NOT OUR THREE, THEREFORE COMPARISONS TO OUR THREE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN DENSITY OR NOT FULLY APPROPRIATE. IT GOES ON TO SAY THE CONFERENCE OF PLANT STATES THAT OPINION YOU PROCESS AND THAT ENABLES UP TO 30 DRILLING.

IT'S BREAK ACRE AND QUOTES. WHAT TO SEE P C P U T STAND FOR. SO A COMMERCIAL PD. I MEAN, BUT IS THAT THE ANSWER? I'M NOT SURE THAT'S IT. COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU. UM DO, MR ITS LEADERS TO BE MORE APPROPRIATE FOR YOU. DO YOU PLAN TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT STILL NEED TO ADHERE TO OBJECTIVE 1.87 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. I'M SORRY. DID YOU SAY DOO DOO PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT STILL NEED TO ADHERE TO OBJECTIVE 1.87 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. YES THEY DO. UNDERSTOOD UM I GUESS I HAVE A COMMENT FOR THE COMMISSION, THEN. AND, UH, FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES. AS FOR THE OPENING PARAGRAPH IN OBJECTIVE, 1.87 ARE TO QUOTE. ENCOMPASS ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE LAND USES IN THE CITY OF STUART. AND SKIPPING AHEAD, QUOTE. NEITHER THESE POLICIES NORTHERN FUTURE LAND USE MATH SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ME THAT EVERY PARCEL AND DOESN'T NEED AREAS SUITABLE FOR THE DESIGNATED USE. OTHER PLAN, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES WILL BE APPLIED TO ENSURE THAT ANY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE SUITABLE FOR THE PARTICULAR SITE. SIMILARLY THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DOES NOT SURE THE LAND ORDER TO THE RIGHT TO THE MOST INTENSE USE ALLOWABLE UNDER THE DESIGNATED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO DECIDE THAT THE PERMITTED LAND YOU SHALL BE MORE LIMITED THAN THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY THAT'S AND QUOTE FROM THAT. UM, I BELIEVE THESE ARE MORE FORMER APPROPRIATE FOR MR REED'S MR FREEMAN, CONTINUING ALONG IN THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES SPECIFICALLY UNDER POLICY. 1.87 POINT TWO WHICH IS THE TABLE OF LAND USE, DENSITIES AND INTENSITIES. THERE'S A COLUMN DELINEATING IN SLASH OUT. COULD YOU COULD YOU X, PLEASE? I'M SORRY. COULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THAT MEANS? YES, LOOK.

HAVING FREEMAN DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. THAT COLUMN INDICATES WHETHER IT'S INSIDE THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA OR OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. SO THE ROSE ARE SPLIT INTO I RECALL. THE UPPER ONE SAYS IN THE LOWER, ONE SAYS OUT ON THE DENSITIES ALONG THOSE ROSE INDICATE. THE USE ON THE LAND USE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THAT ALWAYS BEEN EYES THEIR SPECIFIC DATE THAT IN AND OUT COLUMN WAS ADDED, OR WAS IT ALWAYS UNDER THAT? THAT OBJECTIVE FROM THE START. I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT DATE THAT THAT WAS AT IT, BUT I WOULD SUSPECT IT WAS ADDED ONE. THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA WAS BROUGHT INTO USE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, UM. MR FREEMAN UNDER THE TABLE OF LAND, USE DANCES AND INTENDS TO USE IT APPEARS THAT LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR FUTURE LAND USE HAS A ZONING MINIMUM. 8.72 TALKING DWELLING. YOU EXCUSE ME DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. UM YOU KNOW, WE CORRESPONDED VIA EMAIL, AND WE BELIEVE THAT I WAS CORRECT AND THAT YOU WON'T CHALLENGE MY ANALYSIS OF THE DENSITIES OF THE FOUR MAJOR COMMUNITIES AROUND THE AREA. SO, WITH THAT BEING SAID. WE AGREE THAT THE ESTATES OF STUART SIX DWELLING IT'S BREAKER. VILLA BELLA 7.6 DOING HITS FOR ACRE UNDER THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD OF DENSITY, FURLOUGHED, LET LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. YES THEY WOULD BE INTO THE THRESHOLD FOR THAT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALSO UNDER THE TABLE OF LAND USE DENSITIES AND INTENSITIES. IT APPEARS THAT THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENT. A LITTLE BIT LOAD. EXCUSE ME LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR FUTURE LAND USE HAS A ZONING MAXIMUM OF 11.62 DRAWINGS FOR ACRE. CAN WE AGREE THAT SEASIDE A 10.2 DRAWINGS

[02:55:03]

FOR ACRE AND TOWN PARK NORTH CONDOMINIUMS AT 11 DRAWING, IT'S PER ACRE ARE UNDER THE MAXIMUM THRESHOLD. OF DENSITY FOR LOW DEBT. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND, UH, SO, WITH THAT BEING, SAID CITY COMMISSION, I WOULD ARGUE THAT ALL FOUR MAJOR RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES IN THE VICINITY HAVE A LOW DENSITY. UM, MR REED'S. IT APPEARS THAT IF I'M READING THE TABLE OF LAND USE DENSITIES AND INTENSITIES CORRECTLY THAT REGARDLESS OF LAND USE CATEGORY DESIGNATION THAT THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PER ACRES 30 FOR IS THAT CORRECT? COMMISSION APPROVAL CORRECT, UNDERSTOOD? YEAH. SO IF A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS THAT 30 OUT OF 30 DRAWING, IT'S AN ACRE OR 100% OF ALLOWABLE DENSITY FOR ANYTHING WITHIN THE CITY OF STUART. WOULD YOU CONSIDER IT HIGH DENSITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CITY OF STUART? WE DON'T CATEGORIZE DEVELOPMENT. APART FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL INTO THE FUTURE AND USE AS HIGH MEDIUM OR LOW DENSITY, BUT. WOULD BE AT THE HIGHER AND OF DENSITY PER UNIT, ERICA UNDERSTOOD. THANK YOU. MR REED'S IN POLICY 1.85 THE WORDS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OR USED. I GUESS WE CAN ALREADY ANSWERED THAT. IS THERE ANYWHERE? EXCUSE ME ONE SECOND, JUST BACKTRACK ON SECOND CITY COMMISSION. UM I WOULD CONCERN LEE, CONSIDER, YOU KNOW, 30 OUT OF 30 DWELLINGS BREAKER OR 100% ALLOWABLE DENSITY HIGH DENSITY JUST IN MY OWN. COLLOQUIAL TERMS. UM SORRY, MR REID'S GOING ON A ZOE WERE TALKING IN POLICY 1.85 THE WORDS MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OR USED IS THERE ANYWHERE IN THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHERE AN OBJECTIVE NUMBER SUCH AS DRAWING IS FOR ACRE IS USED TO DEFINE WHAT MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IS? NO WE DON'T. WE ONLY HAVE LOW DENSITY. IN OUR COM PLAN, SO MEDIUM AND HIGH IS NOT DEFINED, NECESSARILY UNDERSTOOD. UM. THANK YOU FOR THANK YOU. I'VE. THAT'S MY LAST QUESTION. AS FAR AS THAT. I JUST HAVE A LITTLE COMMENTS BASED ON THAT FOR CITY COMMISSION, AND THEN I'LL GET INTO MY PRESENTATION. SO AS WE JUST TALKED ABOUT, I'LL BE ARGUING THAT 30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE IS THE UPPER LIMIT OF HIGH DENSITY, LOW DENSITY FOR FUTURE LAND USES HIS PREVIOUSLY PREVIOUSLY TALKED ABOUT RANGES FOR 8.7 TO 11.60 DWELLING. IT'S FOR ACRE. MEDIUM DENSITY. IN THE LACK OF AN OBJECTIVE DEFINITION WOULD WOULD LOGICALLY START AT 11.63 DRAWINGS PER ACRE. WHERE MEDIUM DENSITY ENDS AND HIGH DENSITY BEGINS IS THE MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION. SO I'M ARGUING THE MEDIUM DENSITY WOULD AND SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 7.44 DARLING, IT'S FOR ACRE, WHICH IS 8.72.

TIMES TWO, AND I'LL GIVE A VERY GENEROUS 23.26 11.63 TIMES TO DRILLING. IT'S FOR ACRE.

ANOTHER WAY OF LOOKING AT THIS WOULD BE THAT BASED OFF THE PERCENT OF MAXIMUM LEVEL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR ANY DEVELOPMENTS STUDENT AND STUART WHICH IS 30 LOW DENSITY IS AT 8.7 TO 11.62 IS WE JUST TALKED ABOUT WHICH WOULD BE A 29 2 39% OF CAPACITY. MEDIUM DENSITY.

WHICH LOGICALLY STARTED 11 POINTS. 63 AND ON WOULD END AT A GENEROUS 23.26 WOULD BE 39 TO 70 FT. 8% OF THE MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS LAB PER ACRE BY PERCENTAGE. HIGH DENSITY I WOULD ARGUE WITH THEN STARTED 23.27 TO 32 MILLIONS FOR ACRE, WHICH WOULD BE 78 TO 100% OF ALLOWABLE UNITS. AND REGARDLESS OF HOW YOU SLICE IT. I DON'T KNOW HOW THE CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSS COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED HIGH DENSITY. A 25.86 DWELLING IS FOR ACRE, WHICH IS THAT 86% OF THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ALLOWABLE OCCUPANCY IN THE CITY OF STUART. ANYWAY IT SURE SEEMS TO ME THAT THE PROJECT CERTAINLY IS NOT CONCLUDING VIOLATES POLICY. 1.85 POINT THREE ALL RIGHT, LET'S JUST GET GOING TO THE PRESENTATION NOW. IF BEFORE YOU MOVE ON, BECAUSE THERE WAS A PRESENTATION FOR THE SAKE OF CONTINUITY. MISS CAMPBELL. ER ACTUALLY HAS THE RIGHT NOW TO ASK YOU SOME QUESTIONS. IF SHE'S INCLINED, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ARE NOT. JUST ONE POINT OF CLARIFICATION. SO ALL THESE DENSITY CATEGORIES. YOU MENTIONED THERE YOUR OPINION, RIGHT? NEGATIVE THE LOW DENSITY IS CLEARLY DELINEATED RIGHT MEDIUM AND HIGH. THOSE AIR ALL YOUR OPINION. WHAT THE DEFINITION. LOGICAL OPINION? YES. LOGICAL OPINION. THANKS. OKAY, SO MY BACKGROUND ME AND MY WIFE LIVE AT 369. SOUTH EAST SEA HUNT AWAY, UM, LIVED IN THE STATES OF STUART BEFORE THAT. I WAS BORN RAISED IN LITTLE CORNFIELD IN OHIO, SEVEN MILES OUTSIDE OF TOWN OF 6000. PEOPLE MOVE DOWN A FLORIDA IN 2005 INTO BROWN

[03:00:04]

AND I WAS QUITE THE CULTURE SHOCK. UM I ESCAPED BROWARD FOR STUART IN 2009. WAS DRIVING UP ALONG THE TURNPIKE LOOKING TO GET A JOB WITH MARTIN COUNTY FIRE RESCUE SAW THE AREA SO SELL DOLPHIN SWIMMING IN THE INTERCOASTAL SAW THE QUAINT DOWNTOWN AND ACTUALLY MOVED BEFORE MY START DATE WITH MARK COUNTY FIRE RESCUE THERE, STUART. I RECENTLY TOOK THE VOLUNTARY EARLY SEPARATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM AFTER NEARLY 12 YEARS OF SERVICE WITH MARIN COUNTY FIRE RESCUE HAVEN'T EXERCISE SCIENCE BACKGROUND. MY WIFE AND SHE WAS ABLE TO SHOW UP, BUT SHE IS A LOCAL NURSE AND. DON'T HAVE A $40 MILLION MANSION AND THE HAMPTONS. I'M JUST UP HERE TRYING TO FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT FOR A CAUSE. I BELIEVE IN. SO, UH, I WAS PRETTY UPSET WHEN THE EPA APPROVED 321. FOR THE FOR THIS TO GO FORWARD. I KIND OF STEWED ABOUT IT FOR A COUPLE OF ABOUT 2 2.5 WEEKS AND CAME ACROSS THIS LITTLE CRITTER IN THE MORNING. UH, I SAW THIS GUY AND COULDN'T MAKE IT THAT WAY. LOCKED EYES FOR A COUPLE MINUTES AND THAT BEGAN MY MOTIVATION. I'VE ADDED A LITTLE MR FOX THAT I DO MY BEST TO BE A PURE TRY, AND THAT'S WHAT I'M DOING. ON BEEN IN THE COURSE OF NINE DAYS MYSELF, ALONG WITH THE HELP OF OTHERS CONCERNING THE COMMUNITY WE COLLECTED OVER 200 PETITION SIGNATURES, AND THESE WERE VASTLY BY THE SEASIDE MARRIAGE RESIDENTS. VILLA BELLA RESIDENTS. TOWN PARK ARE NORTH CONDOMINIUM RESIDENTS AS WELL AS POPPLETON CREEK PARK PATRONS. AND WE'LL ALL NOT ALL THE PUBLICAN CREEK PARK PATRONS ARE CITY OF STUART PROPER, WOULD ARGUE THAT THE SIGNS SITTING RIGHT OUT FRONT OF THE PAVILION STATES THAT THIS IS IMPORTANT NATURAL AREA TO THE CITIZENS AND VISITORS OF OUR REGION. MOREOVER ROLE IN THIS TOGETHER THERE'S A CITY COMMITTEE COMMISSION IN ATTENDANCE AT 3838 MEETING, AND I BELIEVE THERE'S ONE HERE AGAIN. UM THE LOCAL BOAT BUSTER ARE WE GOT COMING THROUGH HERE IS CALLED MARTY. NOT STUART, NOT STEWIE AND THE CITY OF STEWARD WEBSITE CONTAINS LINKS FOR BARTON VOTES AND YOU PICK UP BARTON VOTES PAMPHLETS AT THE CITY HALL. AND PLEASE NOTE AS MISS CANDLER MENTIONED EARLIER THAT THE PETITION DOES NOT ASK FOR NO DEVELOPMENT. RATHER THE PETITION ASKED FOR NOT TO EXCEED 15 DWELLINGS FOR ACRE. TRAFFIC. CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSS COULD BE THE FIRST DOMINO TO FALL THIS THE THERE'S ANOTHER PROPERTY ON CENTRAL PARKWAY ON NORTH SIDE JUST EAST OF RACE STREET. 4.8884 POINT 88 ACRES AND THAT'S DESIGNATED. IT IS OUR THREE. COULD SEE THAT'S THAT AREA IN THERE. IT'S IN BY THE TOWN PARK CONDOMINIUMS, AND WITH THIS PROJECT BEING APPROVED A 29.47 ACRES ON MARCH 8TH THAT ARGUE THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN SET AND THERE'S NO REASON TO THINK THAT. THE PROGRESSIVE PROPERTIES. EVERYBODY'S THAT WOULDN'T WANT TO DO 30 UNITS PER ACRE ARE ADDING ADDITIONAL 146 YEARS TO CENTRAL PARKWAY. IN ADDITION, HIDDEN KEY APARTMENTS WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION, AND THAT'S 28 UNITS AND, WELL, THAT'S ON CANTER. IT'S JUST NORTH OF CENTRAL PARK, RIGHT RIGHT THERE AND WOULD INFLUENCE OUR TRAFFIC. AND AS A 3 29 21 SEASIDE BY MARRIAGE WAS ONLY HALF FILLS. WE GOT ANOTHER 35 UNITS STILL BE INHABITED IN THERE. AND YOU CAN SEE, UH. RIGHT HERE IS CENTRAL PARKWAY LOVES THE AREA IS TALKING ABOUT. UH PROGRESSIVE PROPERTIES THAT 4.8 ACRES IS RIGHT IN THERE, SO POTENTIALLY 146 UNITS. 172 HERE. YOU STILL HAVE MANY RESIDENTS CAN MOVED INTO IN MY PRESENCE HERE. SEASIDE. MODELS HERE. AND AS WELL AS HIDDEN KEY APARTMENTS. DON'T QUOTE ME EXACTLY, BUT I BELIEVE IS RIGHT AROUND. HERE. SO IF WE DO THE MATH ON THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.

SOMEWHERE AROUND POTENTIAL S CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSS IT REDUCED FROM 196 DOWN 172 WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING MAURA AROUND ADDITIONAL 380 UNITS TO THE NERVOUS CENTER 172 FROM THERE. BEFORE MENTIONED 146 FROM PROGRESSIVE PROPERTIES. PINKY APARTMENTS 28 THERE MAJOR SEASIDE 35. NOT TO MENTION WHEN NOT IF WILL THE EXTENSION TO COME THROUGH IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THAT WE'RE GONNA BEGIN A LOT CLOSER TO OUR CAPACITY, WHICH I WOULD ARGUE. WE SHOULDN'T BE TRYING TO FILL OUR CAPACITY. YES. MACKENZIE ENGINEERING OF PLANNING INCORPORATED PROJECTED FOR THE 24 2024 TRAVEL CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, THEY MADE NO INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS.

TALKING ABOUT THE WILL WILL BE ROAD COMING THROUGH. UM. SAFETY ISSUES. I'LL JUST SAY ONE THING ABOUT SPEED ACTUALLY MADE TWO THINGS THAT CITY COMMISSIONERS, I BELIEVE, BELIEVE THAT MR BILL

[03:05:03]

FISHER EMAILED YOU ALL TALKING ABOUT INSTANT HE STALLED WITH A CAR RETENTION DITCH. I BELIEVE LINDA KAY. RICK RICHARDS IS GONNA SPEAK MORE TO THAT. MORE OF THAT. UM, BUT OTHER THAN THAT, ME AND MICHAEL STRETCH AND SOMEBODY IN THIS ROOM, WE'RE WALKING. FROM. SEASIDE BACK OVER TO THE POLITICS, LEAD DOG PARK, AND I HAD TO PUT MY ARM OUT LIKE YOU WOULD FOR A SMALL CHILD WITH A THIRD PERSON. A SPORTS CAR WAS ZOOMING AROUND A BLIND CURVE AND WHILE AWFULLY AGREE THAT UH, IT'S NOT THE LOSS FAULT THAT THEY'RE SPEEDING IN THIS AREA. IT'S JUST A FACT OF LIFE IN THAT AREA. U TURNS. THANK YOU, MISS CAN BLUR. THANK YOU, DON. THEY WERE REMOVED. I THINK THAT'S A REALLY GOOD IDEA. PARALLEL PARKING STILL REMAINS. AND THIS IS THE AREA WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT THROUGH HERE. NO NO. THIS WAS IN REGARDS THE U TURN, SO NEEDED. NO NEED TO TALK ABOUT THAT. HERE IS THE SOUTH SIDE OF CENTRAL PARK. RIGHT RIGHT AROUND THIS AREA, YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE THE SIGN FOR THE LOSS. UM SO THIS WOULD BE TRAFFIC COMING EASTBOUND COMING AROUND THAT THAT BLIND CURVE THERE, WHICH IS BLOCKED NOT ONLY BY. BUILDINGS BUT ALSO A WALL THERE, AND THERE'S TALK OF PUTTING SIX PARKING SPOTS THROUGH HERE. AND ON THE WESTBOUND NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD TRAFFIC COMING AROUND HERE AND NOTE THAT THERE'S JUST VEGETATION RIGHT HERE, BUT YOU LOOK OVER HERE JUST A LITTLE BIT FURTHER. THERE ARE, UM, BUILDINGS. SO EVEN IF THE VEGETATION IS ONE OF THEIRS TO THE BUILDING'S BLOCKING, MAKING A BLIND CURVE AND SHARP TURNS AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE. 10 SPOTS FOR PARALLEL PARKING COMING THROUGH THERE. AND THIS. DON'T THIS MAP DOESN'T DO IT FULL JUSTICE, BUT JUST SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE. SIX PARALLEL PARKING SPOTS AROUND HERE. AND ON THIS SIDE HERE, I'M NOT A. TRAFFIC EXPERT. JUST PARALLEL PARKING. THIS AREA JUST SEEMS LIKE A BAD IDEA TO ME ON IF I RECALL CORRECTLY, THE PARALLEL PARKING ISN'T EVEN ON THE FLORIDA STATE DRIVER'S TEST ANYMORE. NOW LET'S GET TO THE HEART OF THE MATTER. THE CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSSES, NOT CONGRUENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND POLICY.

1.85 DEVELOPMENT ALL VACANT UNPLANTED AREAS DOESN'T NEED HIS RESIDENTIAL SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH ANY SURROUNDING EXISTING HOMES. IF YOU LOOK I HAVE A COUPLE TYPOS ON HERE, SO BEAR WITH ME OFF. I'LL CORRECT THEM FOR YOU FROM FROM THE SEASIDE PULL LOOKING WEST TOWARDS VILA BELA VILLA. BELLA WOULD BE THIS AREA RIGHT HERE. YOU WOULD HAVE NO IDEA THAT VILLA BELLA IS EVEN HERE. YOU'RE LOOKING. LOOK JUST FROM MY ADDRESS RIGHT HERE. YOU CAN SEE THAT. VILLA BELLA'S RIGHT HERE ALONG THIS TREE LINE WOULD NEVER EVEN KNOW IT'S THERE. I'M SORRY THAT YES, THAT IS CORRECT. IT IS LOOKING WEST. THIS IS ACTUALLY LOOKING EAST WANTS GOING TOE APOLOGIZE FOR THE TYPE OF, BUT THIS AREA RIGHT HERE IS GONNA BE REPLACED WITH A MINIMUM OF 45 FT TALL BUILDINGS RIGHT THERE. THOSE TREES ARE GONNA BE GOING. UM MY WIFE, MY WIFE'S FRIENDS. PARENTS WERE LOOKING TO MOVE INTO SEASIDE AND WE COULDN'T IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, NOT TELL HIM THAT THERE COULD BE A FOUR STORY BUILDING GOING RIGHT WHERE THEY WERE, THEIR MASTER BEDROOM WOULD GO. AND WITH THAT, BEING SAID, AS YOU CAN SEE, THEY THANKED US FOR THE PUBLIC NOTICE, THEY SAID. THERE'S A BIG STEAK DINNER, AND EVEN THOUGH THEY HAD A FEW $1000 DOWN, DON'T CALL ME AN EXACT NUMBER. I BELIEVE IT WAS LIKE 3 TO 5000. THEY DIDN'T PUT THE DOWN PAYMENT FOR THE MORTGAGE, BUT THEY. HAD SOME MONEY IN THERE. THEY PULLED OUT AND WENT TO JENSEN. WHY DID THEY DO THIS? BECAUSE THEY WERE MOVING OUT FROM NEW YORK CITY AND WANTED TO GET OUT OUT OF THE HUSTLE AND BUSTLE OF THAT. WE'RE LOOKING TO ESCAPE TO SOMETHING QUIET AND. THE FOUR STORIES RIGHT OUTSIDE THEIR MASTER BEDROOM. JUST KILLED THE DREAM SEASIDE. AND AS YOU CAN SEE WHERE WE'RE TALKING HERE. THESE ARE THE INDIVIDUALS THAT REALLY GOING TO SUFFER AND SEASIDE ASSED FAR AS THIS BEING BUILT HERE, SOMETHING THAT'S NOT GROUND WITH IT NEIGHBORHOOD. UM. ACTUALLY LIVE RIGHT OVER HERE, BUT THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE REALLY GOING TO SUFFER. WHAT COMES TO THAT. I POLICY 1.853 WHENEVER POSSIBLE, AND I CERTAINLY BELIEVE IT'S POSSIBLE IN THIS SITUATION, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND RECREATION OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOULD SERVE HIS BUFFERS BETWEEN HIGHER AND LOWER. INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES TO ACHIEVE A LOT ORDERLY LOOK, LAND USE TRANSITION, AND I GUESS YOU COULD ARGUE THAT THERE'S RECREATION OPEN SPACE ON THE NORTH SIDE, ALTHOUGH I STILL SAY IT'S IN POOR TASTE TO PUT THAT NEXT TO THE PARK. ON THE SOUTH SIDE WAY ALREADY HAVE LOW, LOW INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL. WE'RE NOT GETTING A MEDIUM

[03:10:04]

DENSITY BUFFER. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THE DENSITIES IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS.

GOING BY DOING THIS FOR ACRE NEARBY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES. VILLA BELLA, A DWELLING IS FOUR ACRES, TWO STORIES. SEASIDE 10 DRILLING, IT'S BREAKER. TWO STORIES. TOWN PARK CONDOMINIUMS 11 LONGS FOR ACRE, TWO STORIES A STASIS STEWART 61 YEARS FOR ACRE. TWO STORIES. CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSS 61 YEARS PER ACRE, FOUR STORIES, SO IT'S JUST SIMPLE MATH HERE. LOSSES OVER TRIPLE THE DENSITY OF VILLA BELLA WELL OVER DOUBLE THE DENSITY AT SEASIDE IN TOWN PARK AND OVER QUADRUPLE THE DENSITY OF THESE STATES IT, STUART. AND JUST FOR A BETTER LOOK AT THIS.

HERE'S HERE'S THE STATES THAT STUART SIX GOING IS FOR ACRE. YEARS. DILLON BELLA, A DRILLING HIS BREAKER OVER HERE IS TOM PARK CONDOMINIUMS, 11 DWELLING AND SPARE ACRE. AND RIGHT HERE.

SORRY I'M STUPID. SEASIDE 10 DWELLING. IT'S BREAKER HERE, AND 26 DWELLING IS PER ACRE RIGHT HERE. SOME OF THESE LARGER 334 STORY PROPERTIES THAT MISS CAMPBELL WAS MENTIONING ON THE FRINGES HERE, NOT IN THIS CENTRAL AREA HERE. NEIGHBORHOOD. OBJECTIVE 1.886 NEIGHBORHOODS, STABILITY. ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM THE INTRUSION OF COMPUTING INTENSE USES THROUGH ADHERENCE TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, DENSITIES AND INTENSITY IS ESTABLISHED IN THE FUTURE. LAND USE ELEMENT. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CONTROL OF TRAFFIC AND ACCESS FOR THE PROTECTION OF ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL USES. LOST ONE MADE OF THIS P UT THAT CAME AROUND 2005. IF I'M CORRECT IT WAS APPROVED ON MAY 19TH 2005 FOR THE LOSS AREA ON DIT DID EXPIRE, THE LAST PART OF IT ON DECEMBER 31ST OF 2010, SO IT'S BEEN EXPIRED FOR OVER A DECADE. TOWN PARK CONDOMINIUMS ESTABLISHED 1987 AS WE'VE ALREADY GONE THROUGH MANY TIMES, TWO STORIES, 11 DRAWING STRAYGER ESTATES IS STUART. I BELIEVE I. YOU CAN CHALLENGE ME IF YOU WANT, BUT I BELIEVE WE TALKED ABOUT THIS. IT WAS APPROVED IN 2005 BILL 2006. VILLA BELLA, SAME TIMELINE. PUBLICLY CREEK WATERSHED. PUBLICLY CREEK WATERSHED PROJECT, THE CITY RECEIVED A GRAND 2007 CONSTRUCTION STARTED AROUND THAT YEAR. REPUBLICAN CREEK DOG PARK BRIDGE AND PAVILION. RESOLUTION. 1 18 20 TENTS OR 2010. ON UM. IN SEASIDE, BUT BY MERITAGE ESTABLISHED 2020. JUST TALKING ABOUT NEIGHBORHOOD STABILITY IN GENERAL, UM. LOT OF LOT OF YOUR CITIZENS ARE CONCERNED. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF WHAT WE COULD CONSIDER RAPID GROWTH TO THE AREA. UM AND YOU KNOW, WE TALKED ABOUT THAT. UM. NO, STUART MARTIN COUNTY WILL NEVER BE BROWARD COUNTY. THAT MAY BE TRUE, BUT WE'D LIKE TO KEEP STUART STUART WERE NOT ON UNREALISTIC. WE UNDERSTAND THERE'S GONNA BE GROWTH. WE WOULD LIKE THINGS THAT ARE MORE IN LINE WITH WITH WHAT'S ALREADY THERE. UM I'LL JUST CLOSE WITH THIS OBJECTIVE 2.85 AND ALTHOUGH IT'S REFERRING TO THE WIDTH OF ROADWAY CORRIDORS. HOW ABOUT ARGUE THE SPIRIT OF THE SUBJECT OF THIS CONCLUDE WITH THE IDEAS CONTAINED WITHIN THE REST OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SPEAKING OF SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES, THE CITY IN THE CITY SHOW MAINTAIN A SMALL TOWN CHARACTER. AND SMART GROWTH. SMALL TOWN CHARACTERS ALSO SOMETHING THAT'S ON THE BIOGRAPHIES OF SOME OF THE COMMISSIONERS. THE SMALL TOWN CHARACTER, SMALL TOWN CHARM.

IT'S SUBJECTIVE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEWART POTTER UH, YOU KNOW, HAD THIS DEFINITION FOR EXCEPT OBSCENITY. THAT YOU KNOW IT WHEN YOU SEE IT, AND I WOULD ARGUE THAT SMALL TOWN CHARM IS THE SAME THING. YOU KNOW WHAT? WHEN YOU SEE IT. UM, HERE'S A GROUP OF GENTLEMEN ON A TUESDAY MID MORNING LET OUT THE REMOTE CONTROL SAILBOATS. UM. IN ADDITION, THERE'S ANOTHER GROUP THAT GETS TOGETHER AT, UM. SUNDAY MORNINGS. THEY DON'T USE STEEL. MOSTLY JUST SHE'S MORE TRADITIONAL. REMOTE CONTROL VOTES. I DON'T. YOU THINK I WOULD HAVE STAGED THIS PICTURE HERE? HERE'S AH COUPLE. THEY STAGED THEIR HAMMOCKS FOR THEY PUT THEIR HAND X FOR A TUESDAY

[03:15:07]

AFTERNOON EVENING SIESTA. ACTUALLY SEE THEIR DOG IS RIGHT THERE AND WHAT WE'RE GONNA BE REPLACING. THAT VIEW WITH IS FOUR STORY HIGH DENSITY. UNITS. HERE. HERE'S A VIEW OF THE SOUTHERN END OF THE PROBLEM CREEK PARK. HARRY, I JUST THOUGHT WAS A BEAUTIFUL PICTURE. RIGHT HERE. YOU GOT SOME ROSETTE SPOONBILLS, AND THIS WAS NOT AT THE LOST TERRITORY. BUT IN THE. PART UPON BLAKE AT PUBLICAN CREEK PARK. I BELIEVE THOSE ARE ON THE. STATE DANGEROUS SPECIES, AND I BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A WOOD STORK. AND IF I'M CORRECT THOSE ARE ON THE FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES AND ONCE AGAIN NOT FOUND IN. IN THE LAW OFFICE AREA, BUT WITHIN 100 YARDS OF THAT AREA. THIS PROBABLY FAVORITE PICTURE. THIS IS A PICTURE TAKEN FROM THE PUBLICAN CREEK PARK BRIDGE. YOU COULD SEE THE. CIVILIANS RIGHT THERE FOR THE PUBLICAN CREEK PARK. AND WHAT REALLY DOESN'T. WHAT REALLY DOESN'T STAND OUT IS THE FACT THAT THE ESTATES OF STUART OR RIGHT THERE. TWO STORIES. SIX THROWING HIS BREAKER HARDLY EVEN KNOW WHETHER THEY'RE I DON'T KNOW HOW AT FOUR STORIES AND 26 DOING HIS BREAKER. CENTRAL PARKER LOSSES GOING TO REPLICATE THAT ON THE OTHER SIDE. UM, HERE'S THE GENTLEMAN THAT CALLED A BASS ONCE AGAIN. THAT VIEW IS GONNA BE REPLACED WITH FOUR STORY HIGH DENSITY. APARTMENTS. LASTLY JUST THIS PICTURE HERE TAKEN FROM THE PROBLEM CREEK PARK PAVILION RIGHT HERE. YOU GOT THE DOG PARK THAT DOG PARK GETS A LOT OF USE EVERY DAY. AND, UH, HAVE YOU RIGHT? THERE IS GONNA BE REPLACED WITH FOUR STORY. HIGH DENSITY APARTMENTS, WHICH I WOULD ARGUE IS IN LINE WITH CITY OF STUART SMALL TOWN CHARM. AND COMMISSION. I'LL JUST CLOSE WITH THIS, UM. YOU KNOW WE'RE NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT IN THAT AREA. WE'RE REALISTS. WE KNOW SOMETHING'S GONNA HAPPEN THERE, BUT WE JUST LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING MORE ALONG LINES AS FAR AS THE MAGNITUDE AND DENSITY WAS ALREADY EXISTING. WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD. UM AND JUST REALIZED I'M NOT. I LIVED IN A RENTAL OF THE ESTATE'S STEWARD FOR 10 YEARS, NOT AGAINST REYNOLDS. WE JUST LIKE TO SAY WE'D BE HAPPY TO HAVE THE CENTRAL PARK WEIGHT LOSS AND JUST LIKE TO SAY I HAVEN'T SEEN A MEDIUM DENSITY. STAY UNDER 15 DWELLINGS FOR ACRE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU. WITH SOME MORE TO LOVE. WE'RE HAVE STUFF WILL HAVE MISS MISS CAMPBELL OR I THINK FIRST COMMISSION WOULD HAVE JUST DO THIS, OKAY? I LOVE YOU. BUT YOU GUYS COULD PUT IT IN ANY ORDER YOU WANT BEFORE HE SITS DOWN, THOUGH WE SHOULD ASK. MISSION WENT THERE FROM US THAT WE CAN, OR WE COULD DIFFER IN THIS CANDLER FOR THE APPLICANT PERSON. I HAVE NO QUESTIONS FOR THE INTERVIEW. NEITHER DO I WANNA HAVE NO QUESTIONS FOR THE OH, YOU KNOW, I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION. YES SIR. JUST JUST A CLARIFICATION OF THE FIVE ACRES WHERE YOU MENTIONED 100 AND 46 UNITS. THERE'S NOTHING APPROVED. THERE'S NO APPLICATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. ON THAT. CORRECT IT JUST IT IS R R THREE SO IT COULD BE UP TO 30 DWELLINGS FOR ACRE.

THANK YOU. UM THAT AMERICA I MAY. UH MR LIKE THEM? I REALLY ENJOYED GETTING TO MEET YOU.

I'M GLAD WE GOT TO WALK AROUND THE PARK. ABSOLUTELY. AND THE FIRST ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS HE SAID TO ME WAS THAT YOU'RE A TREE GUY. HAVE A VERY GOOD TOO HAVE A FARMER, UM. I WAS. YOU SHOWED A LOT OF BEAUTIFUL PHOTOS OF PUBLICAN CREEK PARK AND I JUST WANT TO SAY WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT PAVING OVER PUBLICAN CREEK PARK. THE ROSETTE SPOONBILLS. YOU KNOW THE WILDLIFE THE POND. ALL OF THAT IS A PUBLIC AMENITY, AND THAT'S NOT GOING AWAY. THAT'S STAYING THERE. I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN ABOUT THE VISTA. I TOTALLY GET THAT. UM, BUT I REALLY I'M THINKING ABOUT THAT PHOTO THAT YOU SHOWED OF THE TWO YOUNG PEOPLE WITH HAMMOCKS.

I CARRY AROUND A HAMMOCK WITH ME ALL THE TIME ON MY BIKE, AND I LOVE HAND MAKING IN A PARK. I DO IT ALL THE TIME. UM. THERE IN THE BACKGROUND. YOU POINTED TO THE. UH YOU KNOW, THE FUTURE SITE OF WHATEVER IS GOING TO END UP ON THIS PARCEL THAT'S IN QUESTION RIGHT NOW. RIGHT NEXT TO IT USED TO ALSO BE. WOODS USED TO ALSO BE COMPLETELY GREEN. AND NOW THAT IS SEASIDE.

ABSOLUTELY YOU LIVE AND WHERE SOME OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE CONCERNED ABOUT DEVELOPMENT LIP.

I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THE INTENSITY. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN ABOUT THE DENSITY TO GET THAT. BUILDING HEIGHTS SITUATION. IS. DEVELOPMENT ALTERS THE LANDSCAPE IT DOES AND THE DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU'RE LIVING IN RIGHT NOW ALTERED THE LANDSCAPE FUNDAMENTALLY, ABSOLUTELY, AND IT TAKES TIME FOR THAT LANDSCAPE. JUST TO

[03:20:03]

KIND OF BUFFER AND SOFTEN THE EDGES OF DEVELOPMENT. UM ESTATES, VILLA. BELLA YOU KNOW THE BEAUTIFUL TREE LINE THAT YOU SAW ON THE WEST SIDE OF YOUR. AREA THAT'S ALL TREES ON VILLA BELLA'S PROPERTY. WAS THROWN IN GROWN IN AND SHADED. UM ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE EAST SIDE OF SEASIDE. THERE'S A FEW, YOU KNOW, LITTLE. ARE THEY FRESH? NO, IT'S NOT SLASH FINDS THEIR CYPRUS, CYPRUS AND THE THAT WETLAND AREA THERE YOUR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AREA.

THOSE WILL THOSE WILL EVENTUALLY GROW AND FILL IN. BUT THERE'S NOT A IT'S NOT A HEAVY BUFFER THERE. AGREEING THAT YOU SEE IS MOSTLY INVASIVES, BUT STILL TREES, TREES THAT ARE ON A PARCEL THAT ALREADY HAD A FOUR STORY BUILDING THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2005 SO. I JUST I JUST WANT US TO BE CAREFUL AND THOUGHTFUL ABOUT ALL OF US THAT LIVE HERE IN THE COMMUNITY LIVE IN A HOUSE THAT WAS DEVELOPED ON LAND THAT USED TO BE TREES AND SO YOU KNOW. INTENSITY IS ONE THING. BUILDING HEIGHT IS ANOTHER THING BUT AGAIN. WE ALL HAVE IMPACTED THIS LAND. WE ALL HAVE. WE'VE ALL WE'RE ALL RESPONSIBLE FOR TREES COMING DOWN BECAUSE OF THE HOUSES THAT WE THAT WE LIVE IN. SO I JUST WANNA. WANNA HOLD THAT IN MIND OVER TALKING ABOUT THIS? ABSOLUTELY AND I JUST LIKE TO SAY REGARDING THAT, AND I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT NO ONE BE. IT'S LIKE THE KETTLE CALLING THE POT BLACK. BUT, UH, THAT WAS THAT WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CENTRAL WAS KIND OF ISOLATED SPOT AND I'M STILL TREEHUGGER STILL LOVE ANIMALS, BUT I WOULD ARGUE THAT THE AREA THAT IS GOING TO BE BUILT IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE PUBLIC'S INTRIGUE, PARKING PROTECTED AREA AND. I COULD HAVE MORE OF AN IMPACT, BUT THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. THANK YOU, UM SOMEBODY ELSE HAD A QUESTION FOR THE INTERVENER. ONLY THING I HAD WAS. WITH YOUR FRIEND.

DID YOU KNOW THERE WAS A HIGHWAY COMING RIGHT BESIDE THAT WALL? UH YOU'RE REFERRING TO WHEN YOU CALLED AND TOLD NOT TO. HI THERE. UH, I'M NOT SURE YOUR MOTHER WILL BE ABOUT YOUR PARENTS IN LAW ARE YOUR IN LAWS FROM NEW YORK THAT WE'RE COMING DOWN NOW? UM, I BELIEVE YET. WE TOLD HIM THAT POTENTIALLY WILL BE ROAD EXTENSION WAS COMING THROUGH THERE AS WELL. BUT AS YOU SEE FROM THE EMAIL, THEY SAID, THANK YOU FOR LETTING KNOW ABOUT THE SIGN. I'M NOT SURE WHICH WEIGHED MORE HEAVILY, AND I'D IMAGINE THAT BOTH DID. BUT EVERYBODY THIS BUILDING ON THE EAST WALL IS GOOD. YOU HAVE A MASTER BEDROOM IN VIEW OF THE OFFICE. SOMEONE HAD SAID EARLIER ABOUT, UM THAT. GREW UP HERE. I LIVE RIGHT THERE ON ALHAMBRA, THE. SECTION THERE WERE ALL THE TRAILERS AND STUFF OUT OF HOUSE CLOSER TO WILLOUGHBY. CALL. IT WILL BE NOW. I WAS ON THE CORNER OF TEA, JOHN AND ALHAMBRA. UH, AND WHEN ALL THIS WAS BEING BUILT, WE THOUGHT THAT WOULD ALL END UP BEING COMMERCIAL. BUT THINGS CHANGE YOU KNOW, AND THE ECONOMY AND THINGS DIDN'T GO RIGHT SO THEY HAD TO CHANGE PEOPLE THAT ON THEIR PROPERTIES. WE'LL KEEP IT CAN'T PUT UP COMMERCIAL BUILDING HERE. WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING ELSE, SO IT'S CHANGED WITH SEASIDE AND IT'S A BEAUTIFUL LOCATION. YOU HAVE THERE? ABSOLUTELY REALLY DO. IT'S NICE AND I DON'T KNOW IF. OUR CITY MANAGER. MY GOOD LITTLE UPSET WITH ME, BUT. MAYBE JUST MAYBE ON OUR MILTON IS MAYBE, UM. GET MORE SOMETHING'S BUILT AND WE'LL SAY TOO MUCH. THAT WE MIGHT COULD MOVE THE DOG MOUNTAIN COULD BUILD A LITTLE WALK BRIDGE WHERE THEY'RE BUILDING AT WE APPRECIATE THAT I DON'T. ANYWAY UM AND THEN MAYBE MAKE THAT LITTLE DOG PARK MORE THERE AND THEN EXPAND. MAYBE I'M HOPING. ON AND PUT MORE PARKING THERE. YEAH WHY? NO PLACE FOR EVERYBODY. WHOEVER LIVES THERE. THANK YOU. YOU HAVE ONE OF THE COMMENTS, I GUESS, REGARDLESS WHAT YOUR DECISION HERE IS TONIGHT THAT I MEANT TO BRING UP IS THAT. DURING CONSTRUCTION. IF IT'S NOT FEASIBLE, MARCELLA YOU WANT CHECK INTO IT? WE'D LIKE TO STILL HAVE BE ABLE TO WALK LAPS AROUND THE PROBLEM INTRIGUE PARK AND WE'RE NOT SURE WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THAT WE STILL FEASIBLE. OR MAYBE THERE COULD BE MADE A BRIDGE ON THE ON THE OTHER SIDE THERE. THE OTHER THING THAT, UH, COMMISSION MAYER ABOUT IT. BUT AT THE LAST MEETING, DID I. REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS HERE TONIGHT. WE NEED A CONTINUOUS SAFE SIDEWALK FOR THE LENGTH OF CENTRAL PARK WHERE HE IS BECAUSE IT IS QUITE HAZARDOUS CURRENTLY. THANK YOU ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE INTERVENER? OR DO WE GO BACK TO

[03:25:03]

THE PETITIONER OR STEP AT THIS TIME FOR THE RECORD, THE INTERVENE URGES NOT EXERCISING THE RIGHT TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME, CORRECT. OKAY, SO THE BOARD HAS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, THE HEARING IS CLOSED. WE CAN MOVE THE SHEETS AND MOVED TO DELIBERATION. HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS FOR MYSELF. EMBARRASSED IT, OKAY? YES, SIR.

SHE'S COMING. OKAY, SO. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YOU JUST FIND MY NOTES HERE. OKAY, SO.

WITH THE REDUCTION WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE BUILDING THAT GETS THE DENSITY DOWN, TWO DOWN TO 2025 POINT. SOMETHING IS 5.8 WHEN YOU INCLUDE THE MARKET RATE, AND THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCREASES THE GREEN SPACE UP TO 30. PERCENT AND INCREASES THE GREEN SPACE. WE WERE ABLE TOMO AD. JUST A FEW PARKING SPACES, BUT BECAUSE THE DENSITY WAS REDUCED, AND WE DIDN'T CHANGE ALL THE OTHER PARKING SPACES THAT WE HAVE NOW WE'VE EXCEEDED THE AVERAGE OF PARKING PROVIDED THE AVERAGE RATIO OF PARKING PROVIDED FROM OTHER BEAUTIES THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED. SO WE WENT FROM ABOUT 1. SO MANY NUMBERS OR SAID THAT WAS MY NEXT QUESTION WAS PART THANK YOU, THE 1.7% OR PARKING SPACE RACIAL. IS THIS PRETTY GOOD. SO THE OTHER THING IS THIS BECAUSE THERE'S SOME CONFUSION ABOUT THIS. THE LAST MEETING WHEN WE WERE DISCUSSING THE WORKFORCE 1000 UNITS. WHAT I HEARD DURING THE MEETING WAS 10% OF THE UNITS, SO IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN I WAS DISCUSSING WITH. MARCELA AND HER TEAM ABOUT REMOVING THE BUILDING. IT WOULD REMAIN AT THAT 10% WHICH WOULD LORD FROM 20 TO 17.2. UNITS OR WHATEVER ONE, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER IT IS, IT S O. OH I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT IT WOULD BE 10% OF THE ACTUAL UNITS BUILT 10% NET 10% OF THE WHAT WAS NOT BUILT SO.

IT IS. WHAT S SO WE GET THAT CLARIFIED, UM SO WE HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING ON THAT. BUT THAT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING. BECAUSE WHAT I HEARD WHAT I HEARD WAS THAT 20 UNITS AT THE LAST MEETING I HEARD 10% IT WAS BRITAIN. IT WAS LIKE WAYS THAT'S I GUESS THAT'S JUST ANSWER IT NOW. BUT DURING THE DISCUSSION, I HEARD 10. THE APPLICANTS PRESENTATION. THE APPLICANTS PRESENTATION WAS ALWAYS. 10% THERE WAS A COUPLE OF TIMES WHEN QUESTIONS WERE ASKED. WHAT IS 10% IT'S GOING TO BE 20 UNITS BECAUSE IT'S 10% ON ON OUR END. THE APPLICATIONS ALWAYS STATED 2010. AND THE CLARIFICATION THAT YOU'RE ONLY CONDITION OF APPROVAL DURING FIRST HEARING WAS THAT TO ENSURE THAT THEY WERE IN PERPETUITY AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES, I THINK IT WAS. UM, SOMETHING THAT CARRIED MAY BE FROM A DIFFERENT DOCUMENT THAT HAD PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING THIS APPLICANT HAD ALWAYS FROM DAY ONE PROPOSED THEM TO BE IN PERPETUITY, WHICH AGAIN IS PRETTY MUCH A FIRST IN THE CITY. SO THEN. JUST TO GET TO THE CENTRAL PARKWAY. I DRIVE ON CENTRAL PARK. WE PROBABLY 3 TO 4 TIMES A DAY ON AVERAGE FOR THE LAST CAN'T REMEMBER HOW MANY YEARS 15 TO 20 YEARS BECAUSE WE BONED UP MY WIFE'S OFFICE WAS THERE IS THAT CURRENTLY THERE IN MY OFFICE WAS THERE UP UNTIL RECENTLY. UM. SO RIGHT NOW, THE CURRENT. CAPACITY IS 13% OF THE ROAD RIGHT NOW. THE ROAD IS OPERATING AT 13% CAPACITY, AND THAT IS. PEAK HOUR PEAK DIRECTION. SO RUSH HOUR WHEN CARS THEY'RE TRYING TO, UM, YOU KNOW, GO HOME AND MORNING WHEN CARS THEY'RE TRYING TO LEAVE. THAT'S WHAT YOU MEASURE. THE REST OF THE DAY. THAT NUMBER GOES DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY, SO YOU MEASURE CAPACITY, IT'S AT THE WORST POSSIBLE MOMENT IN THE DIRECTION TRAFFIC IS GOING AND I AGAIN I TRAVEL ON THAT QUITE A BIT, AND THERE'S. LOT OF CAPACITY. IT'S ACTUALLY I ALWAYS WONDERED WHY IT'S A FOUR LANE ROAD TO BEGIN WITH, AFTER ESPECIALLY LIVING OFF A PALM CITY ROAD AND SEEING HOW MUCH. TRAFFIC AND DEVELOPMENT WE HAVE ON PALM CITY ROAD AND COMPARISON IF I MAY ADD ONE ELEMENT TO THAT IT WAS MENTIONED THAT MACKENZIE ENGINEERING BY THE WAY, THIS APPLICANT HAS TWO ENGINEERS ON THE TEAM AND THE CITY ALSO HAS KIM LEE HORN, A THIRD ENGINEER THAT REVIEWS THIS. IT WAS MENTIONED THAT. JUST ONE SENTENCE OUT OF CONTACTS FROM MACKENZIE ENGINEERING OVER HOW TRAFFIC WAS CALCULATED OR NOT CALCULATED. I WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THIS ROAD. HAS SUCH A LOW

[03:30:01]

CAPACITY ON IT THAT IT'S NOT EVEN PART OF THE CITY'S OVERALL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK AND BECAUSE IT WASN'T PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. KIM THE HORNE WAS LOOKING AT DOING AN ANALYSIS OF DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS THAT DIDN'T EXIST. AND THAT WAS THAT RESPONSE AND WHAT THAT REFERRED TO BUT AGAIN IT WAS. IT WAS OUR SURPRISE, AND THAT'S WHEN THE WHOLE CONVERSATION STARTED OF. LOW AMOUNT OF YOU KNOW, YOU SAID YOU THIS OKAY. SO IN CURRENTLY.

SO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THIS BUILDING THAT INCLUDING THE PARAPETS IS 45 FT PURSUIT THE CODE. YES, IT'S 45 FT. THAT'S THAT'S THE BOX. THERE'S PARAPETS. THERE'S A COUPLE OF STARE ELEMENTS SO YES, IT'S A FOUR STORY AND BECAUSE OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. THE BUILDING MASS IS SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER THAN THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SQUARE FOOTAGE IS ABOUT 20,000 SQUARE FEET LESS THAN WHAT WAS APPROVED BEFORE. OKAY? OKAY. I THINK THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR NOW. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS ARE. HAVE A GUESS. A FEW QUESTIONS SUMMER FOR MISS CAMPBELL, ER AND SOME OF HER STAFF. ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS THAT THAT THIS PROJECT DOES BRING TO LIGHT. IS THE LEAST FOR ME AS A COMMISSIONER.

NEED KIND OF A BASELINE TO TWO FACTOR. WHAT CAN BE BUILT? I'M A BIG BELIEVER IN PROPERTY RIGHTS. BUT I NEED A BASELINE. TOTO LOOK AT THE BEAUTY PROCESS. THAT'S WHAT THE KIND OF THE PD PROCESSES IT'S. IT'S FOR US. TO NEGOTIATE, YOU KNOW. AND WAY THAT BURDEN OF WHAT'S THE BEST FOR THE CITY OF STUART. HAD TO GO OFF OF THAT BASS LINE A LITTLE BIT TO FACTOR IN THE AMENITIES THAT ARE GIVEN WHERE THERE'S THIS PROJECT OR ANOTHER ONE AND SEE WHAT'S BEST FOR THE RESIN. SO WE DO HAVE THAT FLEXIBILITY IN THE HARD COAT. BUT FOR ME, I NEED A BASS LINE AND THIS PROJECT BRINGS TO LIGHT NO. ARE WE COMPARING IT? TO THE ZONING THAT IT WAS PRIOR TO THE ORIGINAL PURITY. BECAUSE BECAUSE THE PURITY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW IS EXPIRED IS THAT WE'VE. IS THAT CORRECT? PD THE TIMELINE OF THE PD IS EXPIRED, BUT THE ZONING IS THE SAME ZONING. SO IT DIDN'T REVERT BACK TO OUR THREE. YOUR ATTORNEY CAN SO. MR MARTEL, COULD THEY COME IN AND BUILD WITHOUT GOING? FOR THE COMMISSION BY RIGHT WHAT WAS EXISTED. THERE ISN'T ANYTHING RIGHT NOW WITH MR THAT WE STILL NEED COMMISSION ACTION FOR ANYTHING. CAN THEY BUILD THEM? ANYTHING WOULD ALSO BE TRUE IF IT REVERTED BACK TO OUR THREE THEY WOULD STILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO COME IN AND SEEK A P U D FOR THIS PROJECT. RIGHT NOW. WE'RE KIND OF IN THIS LIMBO SPOT. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT COULD BE BUILT BY RIGHT? BY THE OWNER.

WITHOUT COMING BEFORE THE COMMISSION. IF THE ANSWER IS. THEY NEED TO COME BEFORE THE COMMISSION. BUT IF THE COMMISSION WERE TO DENY THEM EVERYTHING AND SAY YOU CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING, THEY'D HAVE A BIRD HARRIS CLAIM SO, YES, THEY DO HAVE PROPERTY RIGHTS. DO THEY HAVE A VESTED APPROVED PROJECT OF ANY SORT RIGHT NOW? NO, THAT IS IN DEFAULT. BUT RIGHT NOW, THE WAY. WE SIMPLY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING APPROVED? NO I THINK THE QUESTION IS WHAT'S RIGHT UNDER OUR THREE, WHICH WAS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRED BEAUTY IS THAT CORRECT? IT'S NO LONGER OUR THREE. OKAY? THAT'S WHAT I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS AFTER THIS ITEM AND THE OTHER ITEM. I DON'T LIKE THAT SCENARIO, BECAUSE I DO BELIEVE IN PROPER GUARDS. I THINK THEY SHOULD.

AND WE SHOULD DO OUR BEST TO NOT HAVE THIS SYSTEM. THAT THEY LEAD TO THIS WHERE AN OWNER.

AND BEING A SCENARIO WHERE THEY DON'T HAVE A BASELINE OF RIGHT. FOR PROPERTY THEY OWN WHERE THEY CAN BUILD SOMETHING WITHOUT HAVE TOE COME BEFORE US. UM BUT, YOU KNOW. THAT'S NOT JUST A KNISH YOU FOR THIS PROJECT. I THINK WE SHOULD DISCUSS THAT. AND IT'S JUST BEEN BROUGHT UP HERE TONIGHT. A COUPLE TIMES OF WHAT ARE WE COMPARING THIS TO A LOT OF THOSE LINES AS A CONDITION? OF THE PDS. WE HAVE A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT, THE BOARD COULD ADD AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION THAT SAYS IN THE EVENT, THEY DON'T MEET THE TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT. THIS PROPERTY SHALL REVERT TO EXPIRES. E WHATEVER IT WAS, OR SHOULD BE, BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE DOING UP HERE, SOME OF US ARE COMPARING IT TO WHAT. MAYBE WAS PRIOR OR WE'RE LOOKING AT SOMETHING THAT EXPIRED 10 YEARS AGO AND TIMES DO CHANGE COMMISSION CHANGES. THE CITY CHANGES AGAIN. COMMISSIONER BRUNI JUST STATED THAT THE. WE HAD ENVISIONED THIS IN THE PRIOR COMMISSION HAD AS A COMMERCIAL CORDEL. I'M CHANGED.

IT'S NOW A RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR. SO I DON'T LIKE BASING IT ON A DECADE OLD

[03:35:02]

EXPIRED BEAUTY. UM. NOW THAT THE WORKFORCE HOUSING WE WEAVE. DON'T DO THAT, THAT THAT'S CLEARLY AN AMENITY THAT IT IS. BEING GIVEN. AND THANKS BEFORE THAT, I'M GLAD IT'S IN PERPETUITY. WE AS A CITY OR. IS THE APPLICANT. WE HAVE A SYSTEM TO MONITOR THAT. IS THERE ANYTHING BEING PROPOSED 10 YEARS FROM NOW? 2030 DO WE HAVE A SYSTEM? TO MONITOR THAT.

THAT'S YOU KNOW, STAYING CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE. AM I AT ALL OR. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A QUESTION FOR YOU, MISS CAMPBELL OR WITH THEIR ARSES FOR ASKING. I'M CHRIS KAMLER.

DID THE AFRICAN HAVE IT? I MEAN, I LIKE THE IDEA. JUST WONDERING IF. IT'S UP TO THE CITY TO DETERMINE WHAT THAT. UH SYSTEM SYSTEM WOULD BE. IT'S NOT UP TO THE APPLICANT. I. SO THAT'S SOMETHING I CAN GIVE YOU. SOME IDEAS, BUT WE'RE OPEN TO THE CONVERSATION. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT US. I MEAN, WE NEED TO GET IT, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT NEEDS TO BE IN YOUR POLICIES, DISCUSSION AND MEETINGS IN THE PAST. THEY'RE THE CITY DOES NOT CURRENTLY HAVE AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM THAT REGULATES OR POLICE THE HOUSING NOW THE P U D DOES HAVE A REGULATION, INNIT THAT REQUIRES. THAT THEY PROVIDE 10% OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. I SUSPECT THAT IF THE COMMISSION EVER BELIEVED THEY WEREN'T DOING THAT IT COULD SEND LETTER AND REQUEST EVIDENCE OF IT. I KNOW. I JUST DON'T THINK YOU KNOW. ANY OF OUR SUCCESSORS MIGHT REMEMBER TODAY. NO 20 YEARS FROM NOW. S SO IT'S SOMETHING WE AS A COMMISSION NEED T O DISCUSS AND FIGURE OUT THIS SYSTEM. IF WE'RE GONNA HAVE IT IN PERPETUITY AGAIN. I LIKE THE CONCEPT AND I THINK IT COULD WORK. MOVING ON. IT'S BEEN DISCUSSED THE OTHER AMENITY AND THERE WAS A BOX CHECKED. CAN WE CLARIFY? BECAUSE IT DOES MEAN SOMETHING TO ME. WHETHER THE LAND WAS DONATED. OR SOLD. FOR THE WILL BE EXTENSION DONATED IN MY MIND MEANS IT WAS IT WAS GIVEN AND THAT THAT'S WHY THAT AMENITY IS THERE ON OUR MENU OF UP OPERATIONS IF IT WAS THE SOLD FOR MARKET RATE. IN MY MIND, THEN WE SHOULDN'T CHECK THE AMENITY BOX OF DONATED THE LAND WAS DEDICATED IN THE FIRST PED. AND THEN THE CITY COMMISSION VOTED AT A MEETING. A FEW YEARS AGO. WHO RELEASE ANY OBLIGATION TO THAT TO ALLOW. I BELIEVE SOME GRANT FUNDING OR SOMETHING ELSE THAT THE COUNTY HAD TO ACQUIRE IT BECAUSE THE COUNTY WANTED IT DIRECTLY. SO WHAT HAPPENED WAS THE REQUEST CAME FROM THE COUNTY TO RELEASE THAT PORTION OR BINDING PORTION OF THE PD. AND THE CITY COMMISSION VOTED ON IT AND RELEASED IT, AND THEN THE COUNTY HAD A TRANSACTION DIRECTLY WITH THE LANDOWNER WITH THE COUNTY ACQUIRED IT, AND I DO BELIEVE THEY PAID THEM CASH FOR IT. AGAIN. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WAS BECAUSE THE COUNTY WANTED TO GIVE CONSIDERATION TO MAKE IT A MORE ENFORCEABLE. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS PART OF A BIGGER, BETTER PLAN. WE COULD PUT MR. CAMPI UNDER OATH. YOU GUYS LIKE YOU COULD E JUST I NEED TO KNOW THE BURDENS ON ALL OF US UP HERE AND STUFF. THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN DONATED LAND SOLD LAND A TRANSACTION. THINK DOES MATTER IN THIS LIST, SO TO CLARIFY, AND I BELIEVE THAT IN EVERY ONE OF MY PRESENTATIONS, I HAVE WAY CHECKED IT AFTER DISCUSSION WITH. STAFF AND THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY BECAUSE, AND I THINK I BELIEVE I'VE ALWAYS SAID IT WAS A VOLUNTARY SALE AGAIN BECAUSE WE ENCOUNTER MANY SITUATIONS. WHERE. ESPECIALLY WITH RIGHT AWAY. I MEAN WAY HAVE A PROPERTY ON THE TERM BIKE RIGHT NOW WHERE THERE'S NO PLANS. FOR WIDENING THAT FOR 25 YEARS, AND EVERY PROPERTY OWNER IS GETTING LETTERS FROM ATTORNEYS TO PREPARE FOR A TAKINGS CASE. SO SO THE NORM IS FOR A LANDOWNER, TOO. WAIT FOR TAKINGS. MAYBE THEY GET A LITTLE MORE. IN THIS CASE. IT WAS AN AMICABLE SAID I CAN'T TELL YOU IF IT WAS MARKET RATE I CAN. PROBABLY CLARIFY THAT IT WAS NOT A CASH DEAL. I'M SURE THERE WAS CHECKS INVOLVED. OKAY REFERENCE GOES TO FINANCING. THERE WAS NO FINANCING THE BANK. THE COUNTY DIDN'T GET A LOAN FROM THE DONOR AND PAPER SERIOUSLY INCREMENTAL PAYMENTS WITH JUDICIAL TRANSACTION OCCURRED.

THAT WAS PROBABLY MORE THAN YOUR TYPICAL. I'M NOT SURE DOLLARS. DID. I DON'T KNOW. I CAN'T SAY ONE WAY OR THE OTHER BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW BECAUSE I WAS. I WAS VERY INVOLVED IN

[03:40:06]

THAT TRANSACTION AND ALSO INVOLVED THE MPO. MEN, OFTEN ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE FEDERALIZING A ROAD PROJECT THEY HAVE TO PAY MARKET HAS TO BE PAID. IF NOT ONLY, CAN YOU NOT EVEN IF YOU AT ONE POINT IF YOU GET ACQUIRED THE RIGHT OF WAY THROUGH, DO ONE PROCESS AND YOU AGREE, AND THEY PAY AND THEN WHEN YOU FEDERALIZE IT, THEY HAVE TO GO BACK AND RE CALCULATE BASED ON THE FEDERAL REQUIREMENT. AND PAY THEM OR EVEN THOUGH THEY ALREADY SOLVED IT, RIGHT? I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE CASE WAS WHY THE COUNTY WANTED IT.

BUT BEING THAT I WAS DEEPLY INVOLVED AND SPENT A LOT OF TIME TALKING WITH COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S GETTING THEM TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE. SO WE INSURED RIGHT AWAY. IT WAS THERE THAT COUNTY DEFINITELY WANTED. TO USE F D O T GRANT FOR THE PURCHASE OF RIGHT AWAY FOR THAT. SO THAT'S THANK YOU COMMISSION MCDONALD IF THE MPR WAS INVOLVED. WHICH IT IS NOW I DON'T KNOW THE HISTORY, THOUGH. THEY DO PAY FEDERAL PAYS MARKET RATE. AT THAT TIME FOR THE PROPERTY. SO. AGAIN. I WOULDN'T CLASSIFY THAT AS A DONATION. BUT THERE'S A SALE ALREADY DEDICATED PRIOR TO THAT, AS RIGHT DAVE DAVE GENTA AND THE ORIGINAL LOSS DEDICATED IT. AS PART OF THE P U D AND THE PROM CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WOULD HAVE HAD TO DEED THE PROPERTY TO THE WILL BE EXTENSION. I THINK I'VE STILL GOT A DEED TO THE COUNTY EVEN THOUGH WAS THE CITY. ACQUISITION. THE YOU D WENT INTO DEFAULT. AND AS A RESULT. THE CITY WAS THE ONLY PARTY TO THE PD LEFT STANDING AT THAT TIME. THE COUNTY. THROUGH THE MPO WAS PURSUING THE ACQUISITION OF THAT PROPERTY. AND APPROACH THE CITY AND ASKED THE CITY TO WAIVE THAT CONDITION. OF THE PD AND THE CITY VOTED AND WAVED IT. OKAY? IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'VE GOT.

STILL, IT'S CONFUSING AND WHAT'S CLEAR IS IT WASN'T DONE BY THIS APPLICANT. IT'S PART OF THE HISTORY OF THIS SITE, AND BY THE WAY, IT'S UNDISPUTED THAT THIS APPLICANT DIDN'T DONATE THE WAY NO ONE SAID THAT. YEAH, I MEAN, THAT, TOO, IS RESOLVED. SO. THE WALK ABILITY OF THE PROJECT. YEAH, AND THE DANGERS OF CENTRAL PARKWAY. DO CONCERN ME, UM. YOUR PRESENTATION WAS CAMERA. ONE OF THE THINGS YOU DO MENTION. BECAUSE I LOVE WALK ABILITY, BUT IT'S JUST AN EIGHT MINUTE WALK TO THE LARGEST EMPLOYER IN MARTIN COUNTY. THE SCHOOL BOARD. YOU. HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY EMPLOYEES OF THE SCHOOL BOARD WORK AT THE SCHOOL BOARD BUILDING COMPARED TO THE TOTAL EMPLOYEES? I DON'T I CAN TELL YOU THAT I'VE SEEN FOR THE LAST COUPLE MONTHS, A BIG SIGN THAT SAYS NOW HIRING ALL THE POSITIONS OUT AND IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL BOARD BUILDING. BUT IT'S NOT JUST THAT. IT'S THAT'S AN ENTIRE DISTRICT THAT HAS.

PROBABLY ABOUT 20 RESTAURANTS, MULTIPLE STORES, MULTIPLE DOCTORS OFFICES. THAT ENTIRE CORRIDOR IS A MAJOR JOB. DESTINATION WITHIN THE CITY. THERE'S JUST NEXT DOOR TO US.

THERE'S A NUMBER OF ATTORNEY'S OFFICES. THERE'S LIGHT MANUFACTURING MOST OF THOSE BUILDINGS DIRECTLY NEXT TO THE NORTHERN PART OF THE PROPERTY. THEY'RE CABINETMAKERS. THERE'S PEOPLE THAT DO ALL SORTS OF MANUFACTURING AND THIS IS NEXT DOOR. SO THE THEORY IS THEY'RE GONNA WALK TO THAT WELL OR TO WORK THE THEORY WITH WALK ABILITY AND SMART GROWTH, AND I ACTUALLY. YOU KNOW, I HAVE WORKED AND LEAD INDY LANGUAGE. I HAVE WORKED WITH SMART GROWTH AMERICA AND CREATING A LOT OF THE POLICIES. THE THEORY IS NOT THAT EVERYBODY IS GONNA WALK EVERYWHERE. THE THEORY IS THAT LITTLE BY LITTLE, THE INCREMENTS OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WE DO START AFFORDING PEOPLE. THE ABILITY THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO WALK. IF THEY CHOOSE TO, MAYBE DO ONE OR TWO OF THEIR TRIP, YOU KNOW 14 DAILY TRIPS. AND BY THE WAY, A TRIP IS EVERY TIME YOU GET IN THERE IN YOUR CAR, YOUR BIKE AND YOU STOP, AND THEN YOU GET AGAIN. THAT COUNTS IS THE TRIP. THE AVERAGE FOR A FAMILY IS 14 TRIPS. THE UP THAT YOU MAY HAVE THE OPTION TO DO ONE OR TWO OR THREE OF THOSE. HAD DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION. WHAT THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF PROVIDING AN ENVIRONMENT. UNLIKE OTHERS, YOU KNOW WHERE IT'S EASY ACCESS.

IT'S NOT. YOU DON'T HAVE TO WALK AROUND YOUR ENTIRE COMMUNITY TO GET TO A GATE. BY THE TIME YOU'RE OUT OF THE GATE, YOU PROBABLY WALKED MORE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY, THEN YOU KNOW, THEN TO GET TO THE JOB NEXT DOOR, SO IT'S PART OF WHAT YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERS TO WHEN THEY ARE STATING YOUR STAFF IS STATING THAT THIS MEAT. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS INTENT

[03:45:05]

OF SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES, YOU KNOW, AND SO S SO YES, THERE WILL BE A THE OPPORTUNITY TO WALK MAYBE TO A JOB NEXT DOOR. OR TO THE A LAUGH. THERE WILL BE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WRITE YOUR BICYCLE TO GET A DONUT. A JUPITER DOUGHNUTS IN THE MORNING AND A CUP OF COFFEE AND FUNDAMENTALLY THE WAY THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED. IT IS DESIGNED. DOES TWO THINGS.

FIRST OF ALL, IT IS DESIGNED ALONG A STREET THAT BECAUSE A ZOE MENTIONED IS AT GRADE THE PARKING IS THAT GREAT WITH THE STREET IN THE SIDEWALK? IT'S VERY PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY. WE HAVE DONE VERY WHITE SIDEWALKS ALONG EVERY ONE OF THOSE BUILDINGS. IT IS ALSO THE FIRST PROJECT ALONG CENTRAL PARKWAY. IT IS REALLY. TRYING TO UM. I'M GONNA HAVE TO BE CAREFUL BUT NOT MAKE CENTRAL PARK WAY WORSE. EVERY PROJECT THAT HAS COME IN, HAS EITHER PUT THEIR PARKING OR A WALL OR NEGATED COMPLETELY. THIS STREET, YOU KNOW, AND SO THIS PROJECT IS STARTING TO CREATE AN ADDRESS WE'VE SEEN OVER TIME IS A CITY THAT YOU KNOW IT'S THE ROLE OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THEN GO BACK IN AND IMPROVE THE PUBLIC ROUND. AND SO, YOU KNOW, GREAT EFFORT AND CARE HAS BEEN PUT INTO TREATING CENTRAL PARKWAY STARTING TO TREAT IT AS A AS A GREAT ADDRESS WITHIN THE CITY. IT SHOULDN'T JUST BE A QUARTER THAT WE IGNORE. OKAY? I DO HOPE. A LOT OF PEOPLE WALK FROM THERE. I. DON'T I HAVE TO VIEW THAT PROJECT AND THAT LOCATION SLIGHTLY DIFFERENTLY THAN I WOULD AS WELL APARTMENTS WHERE THERE'S NO, IT'S IN THE HEART OF THE URBAN CORE. AND SOMEONE NO. UP. NO. THE SECOND BUILDING IN FROM CENTRAL PARKWAY IS GONNA GET OUT AND WALK. OF COURSE, OF COURSE IT IS. IT IS DIFFERENT. YOU HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE. UM I'VE HEARD A LOT FROM THE. GENERAL, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTS ABOUT THE.

ARGUMENT AGAINST THE FOUR STORY HEIGHT LIMIT AND THE BUILDINGS WE DO HAVE THAT THAT IS THAT HIS CODE THEY'RE ALLOWED TO BUILD. FOUR STORIES BY RIGHT ONE OF THINGS I ALWAYS CONSIDER. WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT FOUR STORIES, THOUGH, IS IF YOU'RE GONNA DO THE FOUR STORIES, PERHAPS YOU MIGHT HAVE MORE PRESERVE LAND MORE OPEN SPACE. BECAUSE YOU ARE GOING UP SO YOU CAN PRESERVE SOME EXTRA. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE AMENITIES II. TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION. WE NOW BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE. WE DIDN'T MEET THEIR CLIMATE. NOW WE MEET IT BY 2. WHICH. IS THERE SO YOU CAN CHECK OFF THAT BOX OF MEETING IT AND THE EXTRA OPEN SPACE. WE HAVE THE ADDITIONAL 20% WATER CLEAN UP FROM THE ON SITE. LIGHT IMPRINT STORM WATER THAT WAS ADDED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD. THAT IS NOT PART OF THE OVERALL REQUIREMENTS FOR STORMWATER FOR THE CITY. SO THAT'S AN ADDITIONAL WATER. I'M NOT. HAVE BEEN THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT AND THEN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AT THE END OF THE CORRIDOR. IS THERE. IT'S HIGHLIGHTED THAT IT'S ADJACENT TO THE DOG PARK. BUT IT'S ALSO UNFORTUNATE THAT WILL BE ROAD IS GOING TO COME THROUGH EVENTUALLY. BISECT THAT, YOU KNOW. LOCATION WHERE IT IS NEAR THE DOG. PARDON SO.

FOR THE PUBLIC TO USE THAT AND HIGHLIGHT THAT IS A TRUE AMENITY FOR THE PUBLIC. THEY'RE GONNA. LITERALLY DRIVE PAST THE DOG PARK. PULL IN. THIS PROPERTY. AND PARK AT THE END AND USED. THAT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, I GUESS IS THAT. EVERY YOU KNOW AGAIN EVERY LITTLE BIT CONTRIBUTES. THIS'D IS THE ONLY PROJECT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ALONG THINGS CENTRAL PARKWAY THAT IS. PROVIDING IT'S OPEN SPACE AS OPEN SPACE THAT PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIVE IN THAT COMMUNITY CAN COME TOO. WHETHER THEY CHOOSE TO COME TO OR NOT. WE CAN'T FORCE THEM TO COME. IF IT'S PRETTY, IF YOU CAN GO HAVE A PICNIC IF YOU IF YOU YOU KNOW YOU HAVE A FRIEND THAT WRENCH THERE, AND YOU CAN COME AND. HANG OUT WITH THEM. YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK ANYBODY CAN WALK INTO VILLA BELLA. AND HANG OUT IN THE GREEN THAT WAS MANDATED BY THAT BEAUTY OR. SEASIDE FOR THAT MATTER, AND AGAIN, THIS IS PART. YOU KNOW, I'M SORRY. I PUSH I PUSH WHEN I HAVE

[03:50:01]

PROJECTS. I'M SURE THE APPLICANTS PREFERENCE WOULD HAVE BEEN TOO GATE. IT. YOU KNOW ME? I DON'T BELIEVE IN GETTING I THINK THAT EVERY LITTLE PROJECT NEEDS. TO DO THEIR LITTLE PIECE OF GREAT URBANISM SO THAT WHEN WE'RE DONE, YOU KNOW THE NEXT GENERATION THE NEXT FEW BOARDS THE NEXT 20 YEARS THAT IT'S GOING TO TAKE US. TO MAYBE COMPLETE SOME OF THESE PARCELS THAT YOU KNOW THAT WE'RE LEAVING A BETTER ENVIRONMENT.

SO IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO LEAVE IT OR 2% OR 3% IS NOT ENOUGH BECAUSE NO ONE'S GONNA GO THERE? I DON'T KNOW. I THINK THAT WE HAVE A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO DESIGN WILLOUGHBY. BOULEVARD AS A WORLD CLASS STREET. PARTICULARLY BECAUSE IT'S GONNA HAVE TO GO THROUGH A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD MOBILE HOMES BUT STILL A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD BEFORE US, IT'S GONNA HAVE TO BEHAVE WHEN IT. CUTS THROUGH THAT PIECE, THE COUNTY IS ADOPTING SOME OF THE MOST PROGRESSIVE STREET SECTIONS IN THE NATION. AND SO YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE WHY I DON'T I DON'T THINK THAT WE'RE DOOMED. HAVING AN 80 FT WIDE.

HIGHWAY AS WILLOUGHBY AND SO, ESPECIALLY WITH THESE NUMBERS S O S SO IN THE CASE OF MAYBE ANOTHER 25 MILE AN HOUR BALANCE MOBILITY QUARTER. HAVING THIS GREEN THERE COULD BE A GREAT AMENITY. YOU'RE WRITING YOUR BIKE ALONG THIS. YOU KNOW, PATHWAY, BIKE WAY ALONG, WILLOUGHBY, AND YOU STOP HAD THIS GREAT PARK WITHOUT NEEDING TO CROSS AND GO WEST AND INTO THE DOG PARK THAT MAYBE OFF OF YOUR ROUTE. SO AGAIN, EVERY LITTLE PIECE LOOKING AT IT IN THE BIG PICTURE. I SHOULD ADD UP. WELL, I AM. HIS CAMERA. VERY GLAD THEY LET YOU DO PUT.

AND I THINK WE IS THE CITY HAVE TOE PUSH AS WELL AND WE'RE AT THE END OF THE DAY. MAKE IT A BETTER PROJECT MANAGER AND APPEAR WE'RE BALANCING. WHETHER THE AMENITIES ARE APPROPRIATE, OR DID WE PUSH AS HARD AS WE CAN AND WHAT'S THE BEST FOR THE CITY? AND YOU AND I HAVE HAD THIS CONVERSATION. THE LIST IS WHAT IT IS. IS THE LIST ENOUGH. I DON'T KNOW, BUT THAT WAS THAT WAS NOT THE APPLICANTS PROPOSED LIST THAT IS THE CITY'S LIST. MM HMM. MAMA, IS IT TIME FOR ME TO SAY SOMETHING? YES, MA'AM. OKAY, GOOD. JUST I'M GONNA DO UP BIG BRUSH. STILL WITH REGARD TO THE INTERVENER APPRECIATE YOUR INTEREST AND ALL THOSE WHO HAVE SHOWN INTEREST AND ESPECIALLY, UM. YOU'RE KEEN INSIGHT ON SOME THINGS AS WELL AS THE. THEY WALK AROUND THE PARK AND. NO THAT THAT HAS BROUGHT SOMETHING SO LIGHT AND WE'VE DISCUSSED IT WITH CITY MANAGER ON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. I'M SURE THAT OTHER COMMISSIONS HAVE TO. SO THAT'S GOOD. WE'RE ALWAYS ABOUT TRYING TO IMPROVE OR OR NEIGHBORHOODS. WITH REGARD TO STAFF. I SEE AND I AGREE WITH COMMISSION MCDONALD ABOUT THE 1.76 PARKING SPACE FOR DWELLING UNIT. AND, UM. OR IF I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT WOULD ONE BUILDING GONE? WHICH WAS LIKE 20 OR 24 UNITS, I THINK YES, WE ONLY ADDED TOTALLY FOR PARKING SPACES TO THE ENTIRE PROJECT. BECAUSE WE CHOSE TO TURN THAT SPACE AND A GREEN A TOT LOT. A SPLASH PAD BARBECUE AREAS, PICKLEBALL COURT. SO AMENITIES BIG AMENITY PACKAGE. OKAY. I KNOW THAT THAT'S NOT MY ON MY LIST DOWN THERE WITH A MINUTE, OKAY? AND THEN FOR STAFF, I KNOW THE INTERVENING MENTIONED, UM.

POLICY I THINK IT'S IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT COLD NOT TO COMPLAIN, BUT IT COULD BE.

ABOUT POLICY. 1.85 POINT. THREE WITH REGARD TO, UH, POTENTIAL VIOLATION AND IF YOU NEED TO CLARIFY THAT, SO THAT YOU CAN LOOK IT UP, OR MR MARTEL HAS CHECKED INTO THAT. UM, YOU'RE REFERENCING. MR. SO, MR. LISTEN CAN YOU GIVE US THAT POLICY NUMBER AGAIN? PLEASE? YOU WANTED ME TO LOOK UP. HE LISTED A POLICY THAT SAYS THAT IT'S COME TO THAT STUFF. STUFF BASED ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION. IT'S HE SAID, THERE WAS A VIOLATION OF OUR COMPLAINT AND WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I GOT WHAT HE WAS SAYING EXACTLY. A 5.1. I DIDN'T PLAN COME PLAN. WELL, CAN YOU GO AFTER MICROPHONE? JUST SO WE CAN HEAR YOU. ACTIVATE FIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT RIGHT IF 5.3 STUFF LEFT. YOU HAVEN'T WRITTEN UP. CAN YOU READ THAT, MR LEITH? UM YES, MA'AM. JUST BEGINNING PART OF IT. YES, MA'AM. POLICY 1.85 POINT THREE WHENEVER POSSIBLE,

[03:55:09]

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND RECREATION OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOULD SERVE AS BUFFERS BETWEEN HIGHER AND LOWER INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES IN ORDER TO IT. ACHIEVE ORDERLY LAND USE TRANSITION. OKAY WITH A P. YOU'D EVEN SOME MORE. TELL WHAT DOES IS THAT? IS THAT RELEVANT? IT'S OBJECTIVE. A. FIVE IT'S AN OBJECTIVE MEETING THAT IT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU TRY TO DO, BUT IT'S NOT A MANDATE. SO THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD IS TO BALANCE IT WHEN TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION WITH I AM PLANNING IS THE COMMUNITY. NOT A VIOLATION TO NOT. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A VIOLATION OF THAT. COM PLAN RULE. OKAY. THANK YOU, SIR. AND FORM FOR MS CAMPBELL. ER. OF COURSE, I WAS GOING TO MENTION THAT WE DID TALK ABOUT REDUCTION. THE BUILDING ONE WAS TAKEN OFF. WE HAVE THE OPEN SPACE. WE HAVE THE AMENITIES. BUT AGAIN, I AM JUST STILL CONCERNED ABOUT TRAFFIC, EVEN THOUGH THE NUMBERS DON'T SHOW THAT THERE'S A HIGH TRIP GENERATION FROM YOUR BUILDING, AND MAYBE IT HAS TO DO WITH. ENFORCEMENT AND, UM, BASICALLY, YOU KNOW, SIGN IT AND THINGS THAT MAY BE THE THING THAT YOU'RE DOING WITH THE PAVEMENT. MY CHANGE IT HELPED TO START CHANGING CHARACTER. AND SLOW THINGS DOWN BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S ACTUALLY A LOT OF RESIDENTS THINK IT'S A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ARE GONNA BE COMING OUT OF THERE WITH CARS, BUT MAYBE THE WHOLE NATURE OF THAT ROADWAY.

SOME THINGS MY CHANGE, ESPECIALLY WITH THAT PAVEMENT HERE THAT SHE WOULD YOU TALKED ABOUT SO AND THAT'S WHY WE SHOWED COLORADO AND HE STILL OCEAN. I MEAN, A ROAD AT 35 30 MILES AN HOUR THAT WE KNOW PEOPLE WERE ZOOMING BY AND IT WASN'T UNTIL WE STARTED DOING INTERVENTIONS THAT BEHAVIOR PARTICULAR BEHAVIOR CHANGED. AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE MENTIONING. THIS IS THE SAME EXACT PROCESS THE CITY DID FOR OTHER STRAIGHT THAT WE'RE INITIATING THROUGH THIS PROCESS. OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSION MEYER. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR.

UM YEAH, I WANT TO PICK UP RIGHT THERE. BECAUSE I HAVE I HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE PARALLEL PARKING, BUT I UNDERSTAND THEIR FUNCTION. AND WHAT IS EFFECTIVELY BEING. AS MUCH OF A ROAD DIET AS THE APPLICANT CAN DO ON CENTRAL PARKWAY. WHEN I RIDE MY BIKE OR DRIVE DOWN CENTRAL PARKWAY, WHICH I ALSO DO MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY. I'M OFTEN ONE OR THE ONLY CAR THERE. I DON'T SPEED. I HAVE SEEN FOLKS SPEEDING BY. IN FACT, MR LATHAM AND I WERE CROSSING THE STREET BACK AND FORTH AND. WE HAD TO. I THINK YOU PROTECTED ME LIKE I WAS A LITTLE KID. UM. ALL RIGHT. SO, UH, BUT THE PROBLEM IS CENTRAL PARKWAY RIGHT NOW. IS NOT DESIGNED TO MAKE PEOPLE. BE ALERT AND TRY TO LOOK OUT THE KIND OF INTERVENTIONS THAT THIS PLAN IS PROPOSING WITH A SAW THE BUFFERED SIDES AND THE PARALLEL PARKING CREATE THOSE CONDITIONS LIKE WE HAVE ON COLORADO LIKE WE HAVE ON OCEAN ACROSS THE STREET BETWEEN THE PARK AND THE WELLS FARGO BUILDING FUTURE CITY HALL. THOSE ARE THOSE ARE THE INTERVENTIONS THAT CREATE THE CONDITIONS THAT MAKE PEOPLE SLOW DOWN. AND OF COURSE, YOU'RE NEVER GONNA FORCE EVERYBODY TO SLOW DOWN. THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE IDIOTS DRIVING. DRUNK OR WHATEVER TEXTING AND DRIVING INTO STUART. SORRY THEY DO. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE WE HAD TO REPAIR THAT THAT POOR FENCE ON RIGHT AVENUE RIGHT ON THE WETLAND RIGHT THERE. THAT FENCE IS ALWAYS BROKEN BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE SLAMMING INTO IT AND GOING INTO THE WETLANDS. LOOK, I HATE THAT, TOO. BUT THE THING IS. THE WAY THAT CENTRAL PARKWAY IS RIGHT NOW IT IS, IT'S LIKE MADE FOR SPEEDING. IT'S LIKE MADE FOR PEOPLE WHO JUST CRUISE CONTROL, SO THE MORE WE IN ON LEE WISH THAT. SEASIDE WE HAD WE HAD SEEN THAT IN A LARGER CONTEXT WHERE EVERY NEW DEVELOPMENT ALONG AND THERE'S ONLY, YOU KNOW ONE OR TWO MORE PARCELS THAT THEY HAD THOSE INTERVENTIONS THAT CREATED THE ROAD DIET THAT GAVE US THE SPEED. BLESSING TO THE SPEED OVERALL AND INCREASED THE SAFETY. SO THAT'S WHERE I'M COMING FROM WITH THIS. I DO. I DO HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A CONCERN. HOWEVER IT'S NOT AS MUCH ABOUT SPEEDING AS IT IS ABOUT. WHEN I IMAGINE. WILL BE THE WILL OF THE EXPANSION. WILL BE A LIGHT AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILLOUGHBY AND, UH AND CENTRAL PARK DAY. OR MAYBE THEY'LL BE A BEAUTIFUL. TRAFFIC CIRCLE, THEIR EGO, WHICH I WISH PEOPLE KNEW HOW TO USE FOREIGN OVER PATH. LEARN OVERPASS WHILE LIFE OVERPASS FOR THE FOX. MY ONE CONCERN IS THAT ON THE. ON THE EASTBOUND ON THE EASTBOUND SIDE OF CENTRAL. FOLKS ARE GOING TO MAKE A RIGHT HAND TURN

[04:00:03]

OFF OF OFF OF WILL BE GOING EAST ON CENTRAL AND RIGHT. THERE IS GONNA BE A PARALLEL PARKING SPACE AND I KNOW THAT THERE'S A. YOU KNOW, THERE'S A CURB OR WHATEVER. IT'S GOING TO BE THAT SHIELDS THAT, BUT WE ALL KNOW HOW PARALLEL PARKING WORKS. YOU GO UP. PUT ON YOUR FLASHERS, AND THEN YOU START GOING BACK SO. AM I AM I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE PARKING THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE. BECAUSE OF WILLOUGHBY EXTENSION THAT'S FOR ME. THAT IS. DON'T I WOULD. I WOULD JUST TOO SOON SEE THOSE TAKEN OUT AND HAVE THE PATH OF MULTIMODAL PATH BE WIDENED AND MAYBE A SHELTER FOR OR AT LEAST AN ENTITLEMENT FOR MARTY. OUR STEWARD OR WHATEVER IT'S GONNA BE. SO, YEAH, SO I MEAN, WE'RE HAPPY. I MEAN, RIGHT NOW WE'RE EXCEEDING THE AVERAGE PARKING THAT IS BEING YOU KNOW, NORMALLY APPROVED AND YOUR OTHER BEAUTY, SO IF WE HAD TO HAD A FEW OF THOSE FACES. I'M A FIRM BELIEVER JUST BECAUSE YOU KNOW, I THINK, EVENTUALLY IT IS REALLY GOING TO HELP PEOPLE BEHAVE BETTER ALONG THE ROAD.

BUT IF WE HAVE TO WORK LIKE I SAID, WITH KIM LEE HORN, WHO'S REVIEWED IT, AND KENSI AND YOUR STAFF. MAYBE GET ONE OR TWO SPACES THERE TO GIVE A BIGGER ANGLE. A VISIBILITY AND I MEAN WE DID THE ON STREET PARKING NEXT TO HIS OLD ON FLAGLER, WHICH IS 30 MILES AN HOUR. I MEAN MUCH FASTER, MUCH HIGHER. THAT ONE. WHAT THAT DOES IS WHEN YOU'RE PULLING IN. AS YOU KNOW, I'M PREACHING TO THE CHOIR. EVERYBODY HAS TO STOP OR EVERYBODY GETS ANNOYED PASSES YOU ON TO INCOMING TRAFFIC. BUT IT STILL WORKS. THAT THE BEAUTY OF HAVING TO LEAVE THE TWO LANES AND NOT BEING ABLE TO DO A FULL ROAD DIET IS AS ONE IS PARKING. THE OTHER CAR IS JUST GOING TO GO AROUND, ESSO. AT LEAST THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GO ON TO INCOMING TRAFFIC TO DO THAT. BUT IF. I MEAN, IF WE HAVE TO CUT A COUPLE OF SPACES AT, THE CLUB HOUSE WAS DESIGNED TO HOPEFULLY WITH TECHNOLOGY TO BE ABLE TO WORK WAIT IN THE CLUBHOUSE FOR FUTURE TRANSIT, BUT. I HAVE TO TAKE A COUPLE ON EACH SIDE TO PUT A. BUS STOP OR TRANSIT STOP! THAT'S ABSOLUTELY WOULD MUCH PREFER AN ENTITLEMENT TOWARDS A FUTURE PUBLIC TRANSIT OPTION OR A.

OVER LIFT WHATEVER THE FUTURE, ALI. PICKUP SPOT IS GOING TO BE WHATEVER IT IS THAT RATHER THAN A DEDICATED PARKING SPACE WORK THAT'S STILL LEAVING US WAY OVER ONE POINT, SO S SO AGAIN.

THE BIGGER PICTURE FOR ME IS YOU KNOW I DON'T WANNA LOSE SIGHT AND THEN THIS IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THIS HEARING. NECESSARILY. YOU NEED TO FOLLOW UP ON WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO ABOUT CONNECTING THE SIDEWALKS AND THE OVERALL TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ALONG CENTRAL PARKWAY AND THEN ALL UP FOR THAT IS NO. DO WE TRY TO FIGURE OUT SOME SORT OF. LITTLE PARKING ALONG. I MEAN, CERTAINLY PUBLICAN CREEK PARK IS A GREAT PARK. AND WOULDN'T IT BE WONDERFUL IF WE HAD MORE PARKING SO PEOPLE COULD ENJOY IT BETTER THAN THAT TINY LITTLE LOT. HUH? OKAY. THE OTHER THING IS THAT SO? I'M I'M SITTING HERE LOOKING AT MUNICH CODE.

I'M PULLING UP THESE DIFFERENT POLICY OBJECTIVES AND YES, I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND WE HAD THE SAME ARGUMENTS ABOUT OTHER DEVELOPMENTS BEFORE THE CITY ABOUT COMPATIBILITY VS UM IT'S THE OTHER C WORD. AND WE CONSISTENCY AND THAT YOU KNOW. TWO STORY BUILDINGS NEXT TO FOUR STORY BUILDINGS. YOU KNOW, SOME PEOPLE WOULD SAY THAT'S NOT COMPATIBLE, ALTHOUGH YOU COULD ARGUE THAT RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY THOSE ARE BOTH COMPATIBLE USES, EVEN THOUGH THE BUILDINGS LOOK DIFFERENT. I WOULD ARGUE THAT WHEN I LOOK BACK, I JUST PULLED SEASIDE'S P UT BACKUP, WHICH WE APPROVED IN IN JUNE OF 2019. SEASIDE. WOULD ARGUE THAT SEASIDE YOU KNOW WE WERE THINKING ABOUT THE POOR PEOPLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE ON THE COUNTY. WE'RE BORDERING THAT AND HOW THEY WERE GETTING, YOU KNOW. THESE MASSIVE THINGS PILING UP RIGHT OUTSIDE OF THEIR BACKYARD AND. WHEN I LOOK AT THE ART TABLES, I MEAN, YOU COULD MAKE A VERY STRONG CASE THAT. SEASIDE IS THE IS THE MEDIUM DENSITY BUFFER BETWEEN THE LOWER INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL VILLA BELLA, I MEAN, IT IS. IT'S MORE INTENSE THAN VILLA BELLA. IT'S MORE INTENSE THAN THE ESTATES, AND THEN YOU'VE GOT 11 UNITS OF THE ACRE, WHICH IS ROUGHLY THE SAME AS. SEASIDE IN TOWN PARK, WHICH IS RIGHT ALONG US ONE SO MEDIUM LOW YOU KNOW? IT'S HIGHER THAN SEASIDE, FOR SURE ABOUT SEASIDE IS ALSO HIGHER THAN THE NEIGHBORING USES SEASIDE. I THINK. COMPLIES WITH POLICY A FIVE A FOUR AS THE MEDIUM DENSITY BUFFER. UM. I WILL. WE'LL HAVE A BIG DISCUSSION IN OUR THE INDIE LATER ON. I WANT TO GET A BETTER SENSE. MARRIED I FEEL LIKE WE KIND OF COMMISSIONER. WE VICE MAYOR. WE SORT OF LOST. TRACK I DIDN'T KNOW WHERE YOU

[04:05:05]

WENT THIS LAST MEETING BECAUSE I FELT BAD THAT I DON'T KNOW. I FELT LIKE YOU DIDN'T GET WHAT YOU WERE LOOKING FOR. AND I FOUGHT HARD FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SO I WANT TO GET A BETTER SENSE OF WHAT YOU'RE AFTER A SAFAR AS THE GREEN SPACE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL. I SEE FOR ME REMOVING THE FIFTH BUILDING. AND OPENING UP MORE GREEN SPACE, ESPECIALLY ALONG POPPLETON. THAT IS A GOOD COMPROMISE AND THAT I WOULD HAVE MUCH PREFERRED THAT THAT KNOCKING DOWN A STORY OFF THE ENTIRE THING AND KEEPING THE FOOTPRINT THE SAME. MORE CONCRETE. LESS GREEN SPACE AND A SHORTER BUILDING. I WOULD RATHER CONTAIN OUR DEVELOPMENT IN A SMALLER SPACE AND PRESERVE MORE OPEN SPACE. YOU SAID IT YOURSELF. THAT'S THE OBJECTIVE.

I AGREE WITH THAT. BUT THEN DON'T. NO. TO ME, WHAT'S WHAT'S ADDED TO THAT GREEN SPACES, AMENITIES FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE THERE AND NOT REALLY NATURAL, OPEN SPACE OR MORE. ON WATER IMPROVEMENTS ON THAT SIDE THAT I WAS REALLY HOPING FOR THE POP IT IN SOMETHING THAT WAS MORE NATURAL, NOT LIKE SPLASH PAD OR IF I MAY JUMP IN, WE FOLLOWED. OPEN AND REQUEST ALSO FROM THE COMMISSIONERS TO PUT AMENITIES ON THE NORTHERN SIDE. I MEAN, YOU DON'T WANT THE AMENITIES WE CAN. WE'LL TAKE YOU WHERE YOU GO ON. IT WAS AN EMOTION TO HAVE THE SPLASH. NO, I WAS JUST FASHIONABLE. YEAH BALANCING YOUR COMMUNICATIONS. MR MAYER BALL COURT. IT'S NOT A FOOL ON A SPLASH PAD WHEN YOU STILL HAVE THE POOL IN THE CLUBHOUSE.

DON'T QUALIFY FOR MIA'S. OPEN GREEN SPACE. OKAY, I GET THAT AND THAT'S. YOU'VE GOT THE POTENTIAL THAT THEY COULD BE THERE, I THINK, BUT NO. THOSE ARE ALL JUST EXTRA AMENITY FOR THE RESIDENTS, RIGHT? THEY'RE GONNA BE THERE, RIGHT? UM. THOSE ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, THOUGH I MEAN THAT THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE A GATED STREET. IT'S NOT A GATED STREET NOW. I MEAN, I KNOW WE STARTED TO DISCUSS HOW THE PICKLEBALL COURT IS GOING TO BE MANAGED.

YOU KNOW, I'M I'M SURE IT'S GONNA HAVE A NET ON DEFENSE AND. WELL, THE SPLASH PAD. I MEAN, YOU DON'T IT WON'T BE A LOT UNDER LOCK AND KEY THAT ONLY THE RESIDENTS IT'S A SMALL LITTLE SPLASH PAD. I MEAN, A TOT LOT. THAT'S NOT. SO RIGHT NOW THAT THERE'S NO FENCE AROUND IT. THERE'S NOTHING DRAWN AROUND IT. I DON'T KNOW WHEN WILLOUGHBY COMES ALONG IF THERE MAY NOT END UP BEING SOME SORT OF A FENCE. YOU KNOW, IF THERE'S A TOP LAW YOU DON'T WANT THE KIDS JUST LIKE YOU KNOW, KIWANIS ENDED UP HAVING TO PUT AROUND. BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN SEE RIGHT NOW. THE PLAN DOESN'T SHOW ANY BARRIERS. ACCESSING ANY OF THAT. OKAY? AND THEN I COMPARED TO SOME OTHER PROJECTS WHERE THE OPEN SPACE BECAUSE WE HAVE FOUR STORY BUILDINGS. IT'S PRESERVED EUROPE THAT 40 50 60% OF SPACE ON THAT'S. NO, I NEED A BASELINE TO COMPARE OR YOU LOOK AT NO. THE NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS THAT WERE RUNNING OFF OF THE PROJECT. AND THE AMENITIES THERE. JUST CLEARLY STATED THAT WE'VE GOT REDUCTION OF 90% OF THEM. RIGHT? THOSE WERE SOME OF THE BASELINES. I'M COMPARING. THIS PROJECT TO IN THESE NUMBERS. YOU ASKING THAT SOME OF THOSE CORN AND COLD CONCRETE AMENITIES A SPECIALIZED. PICKLEBALL PORCH MAY BE TAKEN OUT AND STILL HAVE A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN HAVE MORE. RUNOFF FORM OR PLACES FOR WATER, TOO. THROUGH IN THE DRAINAGE AREA TO GO TOWARDS THE.

COMPETENT CREEK AREA. YEAH, I WOULD. I MEAN, I WOULD PREFER. DON'T KNOW HOW. I MEAN. I'M HEARING THE CONVERSATION. YOU'RE THE ONE THAT MENTIONED THAT WILLOUGHBY IS GOING TO CUT THIS SIDE OFF OF. REPUBLICAN, BUT I MEAN, I'M OPEN. TO YOU KNOW, MAYBE WE'RE MISSING MISUNDERSTOOD THE AMENITY REQUEST. I ADMIRE IN THE AMENITIES LAST. MEETING. YEAH I WANTED TO SO MUCH FOR WHAT WE SHOULD PROBABLY DO IS ASK THE QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANTS LIKE THE FACTS UNDER A QUASI JUDICIAL, THE BOARD COULD PROBABLY NEGOTIATE OR DELIBERATE. AND DISCUSS WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING FOR ONCE THE EVIDENTIARY SIDE OF THE HEARING IS CLOSED, OKAY, MR MAYER, SO, YES. HERE HERE ARE THE DIRECT QUESTIONS. WE SO SOME DISCUSSION WAS MADE ABOUT ENFORCEMENT OF THE SET ASIDE FOR THE AM, I THINK TWO UNITS AFFORDABLE UNITS. WE DIDN'T DISCUSS THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF IT. WHICH WE CAN DO. WHICH WE SHOULD PROBABLY DO WITH YOU. AND WHAT'S IT POSSIBLE? I SEE THIS AS BEING LIKE WHEN WE HAVE A PRESERVED WE HAVE A PANT. THAT YOU WERE THAT YOU HAVE TO LIVE BY, RIGHT? SO WE HAVE A

[04:10:06]

PANT. THAT'S HOW WE DO ENFORCEMENT OF PRESERVED AREAS. FOR THE AM I UNITS, I WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A REPORTING REQUIREMENT. THAT WE NEED TO BE THAT IS TO BE DELIVERED TO STAFF ON A QUARTERLY. AND ANNUAL BASIS AND THEN STAFF REVIEWS IT AND MAKE SURE THAT IT'S IN COMPLIANCE. THAT'S THE SAME THING THAT WE DISCUSSED WITH SAVANNAH BEFORE WE LET THEM PAY US INSTEAD OF DOING THE UNITS. SAVANNAH. THAT WAS THE PROGRAM. WE HAD NEGOTIATED WITH THEM. AND SO I JUST ASSUMED THAT AS PART OF THIS CONDITION. ENFORCEMENT AND THE MONITORING OF THE AFFORDABLE UNITS. THE 10% AFFORDABLE UNITS IN PERPETUITY IS THAT THERE WILL BE A REPORTING REQUIREMENT. LIBERA BLE ON WHETHER IT'S THE QUARTERLY AND OR ANNUAL. OF THE NUMBER OF UNITS WHO'S IN THEM, HOW YOU DETERMINED THAT THEY WERE YOU KNOW 80% AM I IS THAT FEASIBLE. HI. THAT'S I'M GOING TO SAY YES, I WOULD. I WOULD SAY THAT MAYBE IT GETS TIED. I THINK HE'S GONNA BE ANNUAL LEASE IS NOT. UM, SHORT TERM LEASES, SO MAYBE TYING IT. TO THE LEAST. TERM, WHICH IS PROBABLY A MINIMUM OF A YEAR, SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT WE HAD PROPOSED WITH SAVANNAH PLACE. AND SO, MR MARTEL I MEAN, YOU HAD SAID. IT'S THAT WE HAVE NOTHING IN THE BOOKS. THERE IS NO WAY TO ENFORCE THIS. I MEAN, DO YOU FEEL LIKE LEGALLY. THAT IS, THAT IS THE WAY THAT. LIKE WE WOULD WITH A PANT THAT THERE'S A THERE'S A THERE'S NO WAY TO ENFORCE IT. THEY SAID. WE DON'T HAVE A PROCEDURE IN PLACE RIGHT NOW. OKAY. YOU GUYS COULD MAKE, THE APPLICANT SUBMIT A LIST ANNUALLY OF THE 10% OF THE UNITS THAT. ARE COMPLIANT. THAT WOULD BE GREAT. AND THEN IT COMES IN. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO COME BEFORE COMMISSION REVIEW. WELL, IT'S BECAUSE THE PANTS ISN'T IT COULD IT COULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND THEN IF IT'S EVER IN DEFAULT? IT'S KIND OF LIKE RIGHT NOW. RELEASE IF WE RENT LAND LAND LEASE TO AZUL.

THEY PAY THE RENT EVERY YEAR. NOTHING COMES OF IT. BUT IF THEY FAILED TO PAY THE RAT, WE WOULD HAVE TO COME BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND SAY, HEY, THEY'RE IN BREACH OF THE RELEASE. DO YOU WANT TO VICTIM OR ADDRESSED THE ISSUE. SO IF THEY COMPLIED AND GAVE THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THAT LIST. EVERY OCTOBER 1ST OR WHATEVER IT IS, AND HE FOUND THAT 10% OF THE UNITS. WHERE AM I? PROBABLY WOULDN'T DO ANYTHING WITH IT, AND IT WOULD JUST CONTINUE ROLLING IF HE FOUND THAT THEY WERE IN VIOLATION, OR THAT REALLY HAPPENED, ESPECIALLY THE LANDLORD TENANT SITUATION WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE OWNERSHIP. TENANTS WILL WRAP THEM OUT. I MEAN, IF PEOPLE THINK THAT THEY'RE AVAILABLE TO GO AFTER THE LANDLORD, THEY WILL SO OKAY. SO THAT IS THAT IS SOMETHING THAT YOUR MANAGEMENT COMPANY CAN DO, AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT STAFF CAN THAT STUFF WILL SEE AND REVIEW. WITH OUR CHICKENS. BE A CLAUSE IN THE BEAUTY. EXACTLY JUST LIKE ANYTHING ELSE, JUST LIKE THIS IS SECOND READING, SO IT NEEDS TO BE IN THE MOTION LIKE YEAH. YES, THIS'LL, IS IT OKAY? THEY DON'T SAY SOMETHING ELSE OF MAYOR WHEN YOUR COMMISSION HOLD ON, COMMISSIONER MY ARE YOU FINISHED, SIR? WELL, YEAH, AND I'M GONNA HEAD OFF. WHAT COMMISSIONER BRUNER, I THINK IS GOING TO SAY WE'RE NOT. WE HAVE TO GET IN THE WEEDS ABOUT THIS. WE HAVE TO BECAUSE. TO EVERYBODY'S GOOD, SOLID POINT.

IF WE DON'T HAVE A MECHANISM BAKED INTO THIS FOR HOW IT'S GOING TO BE ENFORCED. WHEN WE'RE GONE. THERE'S NO THERE'S NOBODY THE WHOLE PROBABLY BAN IT WHEN WE'RE GONE, BECAUSE IT'S JUST. TOO I UNDERSTAND, AND I DON'T WANT DON'T WANT IT BECAUSE YOU GUYS WERE DELIBERATING. YES THAT'S HOLD ON. LET'S JUST GET THE RESPONSES. I'M DONE WITH MY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT THAT WILL DELIBERATE AFTER THIS. ARE ALL THE COMMISSIONER'S SATISFIED WITH THE PRESENTATION FROM STAFF AND FROM. THE PETITIONER AND HAVE YOU ASKED YOUR QUESTIONS BASED ON THEIR PRESENTATIONS? YES. YES THAT'S THE MARTEL, PLEASE HOLD ON, SIR. PLEASE HOLD ON. MAYBE YOU'LL HAVE. TO DOES HE GET ANOTHER BITE OF THE APPLE TO ASK THE QUESTION? AT THIS POINT? I CAN'T HAVE DELIBERATED. YOU GUYS JUST SPENT 25 MINUTES DISCUSSING NEW ISSUES, SO I THINK HE DOES. OKAY, JUST HOLD ON. PLEASE SIR. SIR YOU HAVE TO BE ON THE MICROPHONE. SO HOLD HOLD ON TO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. IT'S NOT BEING RECORDED ANYWAY.

MARCELLO WE'RE STILL GONNA HOLD YOU IN RESERVE WHEN WE DO OUR OUR DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION CHAIR AT THE STOMACH WOULD ASK MR LEYTON TO MAKE ONE VERIFICATION THAT HE WANTED TO MAKE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YES I APOLOGIZE FOR SPEAKING OUT OF TURN. I'M LOOKING AT THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AT LEAST I BELIEVE I AM ON THE INTERNET CITY OF STUART GOT US. WE START OFF LOOKING AT ORDNANCE NUMBER 22 0 5-2010. EXHIBIT BELIEVE IT'S I 9 27 2010. IT STARTS OFF

[04:15:09]

OF THE OBJECTIVE 1.85 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. IT'S IT GOES INTO POLICY. ONE POINT.

5.3 UM, UM I'M LOOKING AT THIS INCORRECTLY, IS IT? IT IS THE PILOT. THE POLICY AND AZIZ COMMISSIONER, MEYER POINTED OUT AN OPINION COULD EASILY BE RENDERED THAT THIS IN FACT FOLLOWS THAT POLICY BETTER THAN ANY OTHER PROJECT AND STUART. WELL, UH, WE WERE WAY DOWN FROM 7.6 AVAILABLE. IT'S A 10.2 AT SEASIDE 10.2 TO 26 POINT LOW MEDIUM. I THINK WE NEED TO BRING IT TO ORDER AND I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE HIM MOTION MAYOR. YEAH ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, SIR. FOR YOUR COMMENT. COMMISSIONER BRUNER. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR THE APPROVAL OF. GLASSES UP, EYES ARE HURTING ME. CHEERFUL ISI 24 61 DESK 2021 CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSS. HAS BEEN EMOTION ON THE FLOOR IS THAT APPROVAL IS AS STAFF RECOMMENDED OR WITH NO OTHER CONDITIONS, NO CONDITIONS. WHAT IT IS. WE'LL WORK OUT THE RENTAL THING I BELIEVE WE CAN SECOND. DISCUSSION SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER I DO WANT TO DISCUSS THE RENTAL ISSUE. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER UM MIKE MACDONALD CAREY. DO YOU HAVE THAT I'LL CALL THEM COMMISSION MCDONALD. SO. I'M SECOND IN MOTION, BUT I DO WANT TO DISCUSS THE RENTAL ISSUE BECAUSE I AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER MEYER THAT WE NEED TO RESOLVE THIS, BUT I THINK IT'S ACTUALLY FAIRLY SIMPLE. AND I THINK THAT IS ON A COUNTER YOUR BASIS WE COULD ESTABLISH WHETHER IT'S OUR FISCAL COUNTER ER FISCAL YEAR, THE CALENDAR YEAR TO SAVE OCTOBER 1ST. THAT'S OUR FISCAL YEAR. WILL BE DELIVERED A LIST OF THE UNITS THAT ARE BEING RENTED AT THE AM I AT THE AMOUNT THAT THEIR CURRENT MARKET RATE FOR THOSE UNITS IT'S ABOUT THAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY BEING RENTED. AND THEN UPON OUR REQUEST, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO INSPECT THE LEASES FOR THOSE UNITS, SO THAT AND THEN.

ONCE A YEAR, WE'LL SEE THOSE WE'LL SEE WHAT'S IN BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO DO ANNUALLY SINCE THEY'RE NOT DOING SIX MONTH PLACES IN THREE MONTHS LEAST, EXCEPT FOR MAYBE A RARE OCCASION, AND THEY CERTAINLY PROBABLY AREN'T GOING TO BE DOING IT ON THE. AM I ONCE BECAUSE OF THE EXTRA WORK FOR THAT CAUSE. SHORT TERM LEASES. THEY'RE GONNA WANT TO GET EXTRA MONEY FOR ONCE. DON'T THINK ANYBODY'S GOING TO MY UNITS IN? NO ONE'S GONNA ONE'S TO LEAVE SO THAT THAT'S NEVER GONNA CHANGE EXACTLY SO I THINK IT'S VERY SIMPLE WITH THAT. SO IS THAT WORK FOR YOU? COMMISSIONER MYERS? YEAH, I DIDN'T. YEAH, THAT'S GREAT THAT INTO YOUR MOTION. MARY, DID YOU GET THAT? WE'RE GONNA INCORPORATE. WHATEVER COMMISSIONER MCDONALD JUST AN ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 10% OF AM I COMING FROM THE DEVELOPER TO THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ON OCTOBER 1ST OF EVERY YEAR WITH THE RIGHT AT THE CITY STAFF TO REQUEST TO INSPECT THE LEASES. GUYS. THANK YOU. 10% OF THE UNIT. MEETING AM I REQUIREMENT, RIGHT? NOT 10% OF AM NOT KNOW 10% OF THE UNIT. THE UNIT SEND UNITS THAT THEY'RE RUNNING ON THE AM I AND THAT SHOULD INCLUDE THE CURRENT MARKET RATE. WHICH BY THE WAY THEY PUBLISHED ON THEIR MOST MOST THESE BIG COMPANIES PUBLISHED ON THEIR WEBSITES, RIGHT HOW MUCH THEY'RE BEING RUN IT FOR SO WE CAN SEE 17 UNIT AND. YES. AND THEN? YES, 17 UNITS, AND SO THEN WELL, WE COULD. IT'S 17.6 SO I COULD SAY 18. WAS IT 18? LET'S THAT'S WHY I'M MENTIONING IT. 17.2 OF YOU AROUND. IT'S 17. THAT'S WHY DID YOU ROUND UP IN FIVE OR SIX? OKAY. AND CAN WE JUST MAKE SURE ROAD THING THAT COMMISSIONER MEYER TALKED ABOUT 80% AM I MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S IN THERE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WAS AGREED TO NOT AM. I. 17 UNITS AT 80% AM I 17 UNITS THIS, UH. I GUESS EVERYBODY'S OK WITH THIS. THERE WAS NOTHING THAT WORKS FOR ME. UM DO WE DO WE WANT TO INCLUDE THE PARKING THE. PARALLEL PARKING SPACES IN PUBLIC TRANSIT, DEDICATION, OR IS THAT SOMETHING STUFF CAN WORK OUT LATER? I THINK I'M FINE WITH STAFF WORKING THAT OUT. GIVE HIM THE OUT. THAT'S NOT MY MOTION, SO STAFF CAN WORK IT OUT. WHATEVER I'M OKAY WITH WHAT IT IS HOW IT WAS PRESENTED US AND WHAT WE WERE TO STUDY. AND TO END THE RENTAL THING HAS BEEN A PROBLEM. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT AND I'LL GO ALONG WITH THAT. BUT IF YOU WANT TO NOT SECOND, IT WOULD MOVE ON. I THINK THAT. LIKE WHAT DO YOU WHAT DO YOU WANT ON

[04:20:08]

THAT? FIRST THE PARKING UM IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE. YOU KNOW THEY'RE THEY'RE OVER ON THEIR PARKING. I DON'T KNOW IF I'M ALLOWED TO ASK THEM ANYMORE IF IT'S FEASIBLE, BUT I WOULD. I WOULD JUST ASSUME SAVE ONE OR TWO SPACES BASSPIS. AND ADD. AND END MARTY. MARTY DOESN'T GO THERE RIGHT NOW, SO I'M NOT GONNA MAKE THEM BUILD A MARTY SHELTER BECAUSE MARTY FUTURE ENTITLEMENT ENTITLEMENT. SO UNEASE MEN OR WHATEVER WE CALL IT. OKAY, THAT'S A REAL EASY.

OH, NO, I DIDN'T. YES MARTY COULD GO. THERE WAS THE COUNTY COMMISSIONS HELP. YES MOM CITY, OKAY, SO IF I'M SORRY OWNER WILL CHANGE IT. I'LL MODIFY MY SECOND. ARE YOU GOOD WITH THAT, MR BRUNER? YES OF COURSE. WE DON'T WANT ANY PROBLEMS, YOU KNOW, SO WE HAVE A WAY OF EMOTION IN THE SECOND ON THE FLOOR. IT LOOKS TO ME LIKE THE APPLICANT HAS COMMENTS. I ALSO BELIEVE THE INTERVENER HAS COMMENTS AND WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT. YES SO I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH FURTHER YOU WANT TO GO BEFORE THE PUBLIC COMMENT, BUT I SUSPECT THERE'S MORE THAN ONE PERSON THAT'S READY TO GIVE SOME. WE CAN HAVE LIMITED RESPONSE FROM THE INTER THE PETITIONER IN THE INTERVIEW. MARY DUNNE INTERVENER. MADAM, YOU HAVE I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM HIS CAMPER. WAS JUST AGREEING. I MEAN, WE COULD LEAVE THE PARKING AND THEN PUT THE STATION THE TRANSIT. WHEN IT COMES AND JUST DEDICATED. WE COULD LEAVE. LEAVE. IT IS GREEN ASSED LONG AS. NO, IT'S THE LANGUAGE IS THERE WE ARE OVER ON PARKING, AND WE'RE AGREEING WITH YOUR DISCUSSION. SO YES. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. LIAR.

IT'S JUST TWO SPACES WERE TALKING ABOUT. IT'S WELL, I DON'T KNOW IF ONE PARKING SPACE ON THIS ON THE SIZE IS ENOUGH FOR WHAT WOULD BE A. EVENTUALLY A MARTY, STOP FOR A OKAY THERE 22 FT LONG SO WELL WELL, AND THEN WE HAVE MORE WHAT? WE'LL DISCUSS IT WITH STAFF. IF IT NEEDS TO BE MORE WOODS, IT'LL, IT'LL IMPACT ANOTHER SPACE, BUT, YEAH, WE AGREE. THANK YOU, YOUR DEALER. YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AGAIN? HERE USED TO MIKE BECAUSE THE MICHAEL YES, SIR. JUST VERY BRIEFLY GOING BACK TO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT LOW MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY. UM STILL THE MATH HERE, UH, FROM THE JUMP FROM VILA BELA 7.6 YOU PULLING HIS BREAKER TO SEASIDE? A 10.2 TWENTIES BREAKER IS A 1.34 TIMES. INCREASE THE JUMP GOING FROM UH, SEASIDE, A 10 POINT TO THE CENTRAL PARKWAY LOST 25.86 IS A 2.5. THREE TIMES. 2.53 TIMES INCREASE IF YOU GET I'M SAYING SO WELL OVER DOUBLE SUPPOSED TO WANT ONE IN THE THIRD TIME'S INCREASE, THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. UM. COMMISSION IF YOU STOPPED DELIBERATING, I'M GONNA MOVE TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. THANK YOU. PUBLIC COMMENT PETITION, MCGEE. YES, YES, ITEM NUMBER 22 THIS. THAT'S 23. THAT'S ITEM NUMBER 23, MA'AM, YOU'RE LISTENING, RIGHT? I'M 22. SO YOU WANNA BE 23? THANK YOU. I HAVE NO PUBLIC COMMENT. SO ITEM NUMBER 22 UNLESS. THEY'RE POURING IN. I NEED SOME NAMES. IT'S A MOCK UP, MR MCCHRYSTAL. DO YOU WANT TO START? OKAY ALL RIGHT. YOU'RE GONNA BE LAST THOMAS TO MCCHRYSTAL. THANK YOU. THIS LINDA KAYE RICHARDS. THANK YOU, MA'AM. GOOD EVENING. THANKS FOR BRINGING SNACKS. ROBIN UM IT'S GONNA BE A VERY LATE NIGHT TONIGHT. I DO BELIEVE I ACTUALLY HAVE A LETTER TO READ TO YOU GUYS FROM BILL FISHER, WHO LIVES AT 53. SEDONA CIRCLE APARTMENT, ONE OF FOUR STUART, FLORIDA. THAT'S BILLA BILLA. URGE CITY COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE NO TO THIS PROJECT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS THIS WILL GREATLY EXASPERATE TRAFFIC ISSUES. SOUTH EAST CENTRAL PARKWAY IS A DANGEROUS ROAD WAY. LAST WEEK, A CAR WAS SPEEDING DOWN THE ROAD FROM US ONE FAILED TO NEGOTIATED CURD. WENT INTO A RETENTION POND IN FRONT OF THE OFFICE. PARK RAY BEFORE YOU YOUR PROPOSED CROSSWALK? THIS HAS HAPPENED SEVERAL TIMES OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS. I SAW THE TRAFFIC COUNTER MECHANISM ON THIS ROAD THIS WEEK, AND IT FEELS TO RECOGNIZE THE PROBLEM OF THE NUMBER OF CARS THAT CUT THROUGH THE U. S ONE IN SOUTHEAST MONTEREY. YOURSELF IS RACE STREET. FINALLY IT ALSO FAILS TO RECOGNIZE THE FUTURE TRAFFIC ISSUES WHEN THE WILL OF THE EXTENSION IS COMPLETED. YOU CAN'T COUNT ON JUST ONE SECTION

[04:25:01]

OF THE ROADWAY TO JUSTIFY APPROVING THIS PROJECT WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE OTHER MOVING PARTS. SECOND THE DENSITY OF THIS PROJECT RELATIVE TO THE STATES VILLA BELLA SEASIDE TOWN HOMES AND THE TOWN PARK NORTH IS WAY OUT OF LINE. THE DENSITY OF THIS PROJECT IS ALSO FAR TOO MUCH FOR THE ALLOCATED SPACE. DEVELOPERS SERIOUSLY UNDERESTIMATING THE PARKING SPACE IS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLEX OF THIS DENSITY AT 1.5. NOW, THIS WAS A LETTER WRITTEN BY ANOTHER PERSON. HE DOESN'T KNOW THAT IT WAS CHANGED TO 1.7. I'VE BEEN ON THE BOARD FOR VILLA BELLA FOR FOUR YEARS AND HAVE GREAT UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THIS WORKS AS WELL AS WE HAVE MANY PARKING PROBLEMS AFTER THE LOFTS ARE BUILT IN THE DEVELOPER HAS DEPARTED. YOU'LL HAVE ONE BEDROOM APARTMENT WITH A HUSBAND AND WIFE LIVING THERE AND EATING TWO CARS IN ORDER TO GET TO WORK. THIS PROBLEM BE COMPOUNDED BY SIMILAR ISSUES IN 2 TO 3 BEDROOM APARTMENTS.

RESIDENTS WILL THEN BE LOOKING TO PARK IN THE OFFICE COMPLEX NEXT DOOR, THE DOG PARK IN THE BUILDINGS NEXT TO THE DOG PART. IT CURRENTLY HAPPENS ACROSS THE STREET FROM VILA BELA. EVEN THOUGH WE WARNED PEOPLE NOT TO DO IT, IT'S SIMPLY UNREALISTIC TO BELIEVE 1.5 CARS PER UNIT IS ENOUGH FOR JUST THE RESIDENTS. THEN YOU HAVE TO CONSIDER WHERE DID THEIR VISITORS PART? SIMPLY PUT THIS PROJECT MAKES NO SENSE IN THIS LOCATION. YOUR THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION THIS MATTER IS GREATLY APPRECIATED. I'LL PROVIDE THIS TO MISS KENDALL AND JUST QUICKLY. IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF TIME THAT I HAVE LEFT. THE PROJECT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 2000 AND FIVE WAS 84 UNITS. 84 UNITS. I KNOW 2005 WAS A LONG TIME AGO, M TO STAND UP HERE AND SAY THIS IS AN APPROVED PROJECT THAT THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO AMEND. IT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ALSO, AS YOU GUYS MIGHT KNOW, I'M A TREE PERSON. FOUR STORY BUILDINGS. WE'RE NNA BE HIDDEN BY TREES. NATIVE FLORIDA LANDSCAPING DOESN'T EVEN REALLY GROW THAT TALL. NONE OF US WILL BE AROUND IF WE EVEN WERE ABLE TO PUT ANYTHING THAT WAS GOING TO BE ABLE TO HIDE THOSE BUILDINGS. HOW CLOSE THAT THEY'RE BEING. QUIT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THOSE FOUR STORY BUILDINGS WILL BE SEEN. THEY WILL BE SEEN FROM. CLUMSY BRIDGE. WHEN YOU COME OVER, THEY'LL BE SEEN FROM CANADA HIGHWAY THEY'LL BE SEEN FROM US ONE. THERE WILL BE NO HIDING THIS FOUR STORY BUILDING. I UNDERSTAND. THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BUILD THE FOUR STORY BUILDINGS. BUT IF YOU DON'T GIVE HIM THE DENSITY, THEN THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD THE FOUR STORY BUILDINGS. IT JUST SEEMS TO ME THAT WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE STUART SOMEWHERE ELSE.

WE'RE NOT A WALKABLE CITY. WE'RE NOT A MULTIMODAL CITY. I COULD GO ON, BUT I WON'T UNTIL NEXT TIME. THANK YOU. THIS CAR, RIGHT? ROBIN CARTWRIGHT. LOW AGAIN. I SAID THEY WOULDN'T COME UP. BUT HERE I AM. MAY I ASK A QUESTION OF MISS CAMPBELL OR DID CLARIFY SOMETHING ABOUT THE WORKFORCE HOUSING BEFORE MY THREE MINUTES STARTS? NO, MA'AM. JUST GIVE YOUR COMMENTS.

OKAY? WELL THE LAST TIME THAT THIS WAS PRESENTED IN NO TIME, HIS IN THIS DISCUSSION HAS ANYTHING BEEN SAID ABOUT THE RATE OF THE MARKET WITH IS A RESULT OF THE ONE STORY BEING REMOVED. PREVIOUSLY IT WAS ONE BEDROOM BEING OFFERED AT $1041 AND A TWO BEDROOM BEING OFFERED AT 1250. I'D LIKE TO REMIND THE COMMISSION THAT THE AVERAGE RENTER IN MARTIN COUNTY MAKES $15.75 PER HOUR. IT IS NOT A STATISTICAL ANOMALY. IT IS AVERAGE AND HE'S BEING OFFERED AT AFFORDABLE OR ATTAINABLE RATES ARE NOT AFFORDABLE, UNATTAINABLE. THEY'RE BEING BUILT FOR SOMEBODY WHO DOESN'T CURRENTLY LIVE HERE. I'D ALSO LIKE TO MENTION WITH REGARDS TO THE RENTING. THERE'S BEEN NO DISCUSSION IN YOUR DELIBERATIONS. HOW YOU QUALIFY.

THESE PEOPLE ARE YOU USING AN AVERAGE MEDIAN INCOME FOR SOMEBODY WHO QUALIFIES IT? A PLACE LIKE HOUSE OF HOPE. YOU'VE NOT ASKED THEM FOR ANY CONSIDERATION WITH REGARDS TO HOW WILL THEY MEET THIS? INCOME VERIFICATION. THOSE UNITS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DESIGNATED VERY SPECIFICALLY FOR PEOPLE WHO NEED TO RENT THEM. IT'S NOT FIRST COME FIRST SERVE. FINALLY REGARDING TRAFFIC. THIS ISSUE OF TRAFFIC THAT WE'RE ALL TALKING ABOUT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE 25% OF PEOPLE WHO MAY OR MAY NOT CURRENTLY LIVE ON THE ROAD WHO TRAVEL CENTRAL PARKWAY. THE ISSUE IS BIGGER THAN THAT. WE'VE CONFIRMED BASED ON AN EMAIL THAT MR FREEMAN SENT TO ONE OF THE LP MEMBERS THAT ALL TRAFFIC STUDIES AIR LOOKED AT IN SILOS.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS COMPREHENSIVELY IN RELATION TO WHAT'S HAPPENING IN BRIDGEVIEW AT THE BASE OF THE VETERAN'S BRIDGE. THE COSTCO DEVELOPMENT THAT IS COMING BEFORE THE L P A. ON APRIL 29TH. ALL OF THOSE ROADS INTERSECT ON CANTER HIGHWAY, WHICH IS ONE OF THE EGRESS IS OF CENTRAL PARKWAY LOSS. I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO STOP LOOKING AT THESE ITEMS IS INDIVIDUAL OPPORTUNITIES. IT IS THE COMPREHENSIVE ISSUE THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH DAY IN AND DAY OUT, AND WE'RE ALREADY A C GRADE WHEN IT COMES TO TRAFFIC IN THE CITY OF STORIES ARE LITTLE TINY TOWN IS A C. THESE 3 TO 5000 MORE PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY SCHEDULED TO COME HERE BASED ON THE APPROVALS AND MR MATHIS AND ASKING THE QUESTION ABOUT WHAT DO THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BUILD? WE'RE ALREADY PROJECTED A MINIMUM OF 3000 PEOPLE THAT PUTS US IN AN F CATEGORY. STRONGLY CONSIDER REQUESTS THAT YOU CONSIDER WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THESE

[04:30:02]

OPPORTUNITIES. IT IS NOT THE IDEAL IZED. WOULDN'T THIS BE GREAT? THIS IS THE REALITY OF WHAT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND WHAT IS BEING APPROVED AND WHAT WILL STILL BE APPROVED. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. JEFF KORMAN. GORDON. THAT'S BETTER LIKE THE RACE CAR DRIVER, JEFF KORMAN IS AN ATTORNEY, AND I'M GOOD EVENING. I LIVE IN SEASIDE TOWN HOMES. I MOVED THE STEWARD IN AUGUST, AND THAT WAS THE. I WAS THE FIRST MOON, THE OWNER TO MOVE INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. WHEN I SAW THE SAMPLE AND THE AREA I FELL IN LOVE WITH IT. I COME FROM DELRAY BEACH AND VOCAL TONE. AND IF YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT DELRAY BEACH, DELRAY BEACH WAS STUART. 30 YEARS AGO. NOW, WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT, EVERY CORNER IS 456 STORY APARTMENT HOUSES.

THAT WAS THE BEAUTY OF STUART. SO I MOVED HERE. AND I ALWAYS WILL. I'M IN FAVOR OF DEVELOPMENT. BUT I THINK DEVELOPMENT SHOULD NOT LOSE SIGHT OF WHAT THE COMMUNITY LOOKS LIKE. AND THIS JUST THAT. FIT IN THAT COMMUNITY. CENTRAL PARKWAY IS ALL ONE AND TWO STORY RATE LEVEL BUILDINGS. THIS IS A FOUR STORY BUILDING. SO I ENJOY THIS COMMUNITY. I KNOW THE SAME DEVELOPER BUILT SOMETHING ON US ONE. NORTH AND STUART. THAT FITS THAT AREA.

IT'S ON A MAJOR HIGHWAY. YOU HAVE MAJOR ROADWAYS THAT IT'S MORE ACCESSIBLE. THIS IS A LITTLE TOWN STREET. AND IT'S NOT THE SAME. WE ALSO HAVE TWO SCHOOLS IN THAT BLOCK AND A LOT OF CHILDREN WALKING TO THOSE SIDEWALKS, AND THIS TRAFFIC IS ONLY GOING TO MAKE IT MORE DANGEROUS FOR THEM. SO I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT. I UNDERSTAND THERE'S I'M ALWAYS IN FAVOR OF DEVELOPMENT. AND I FEEL THERE IS A DENSITY ISSUE. I KNOW YOU SAID YOU CAN'T STOP FOR STORY BUILDINGS, BUT YOU CAN STOP THE AMOUNT OF APARTMENTS AND BUILDINGS.

THAT'S MY OPINION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. IT SUGGESTS HARDEN. MADAM MAYOR AND VICE MARRIAGE COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR CONSIDERATION THIS PROJECT. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT. UNLIKE A LOT OF THE SPEAKERS. THIS EVENING ON DAZ MENTIONED BEFORE WE WERE HIRED LOCALLY TO BE THE BUILDER FOR THE PROJECT, AND THIS DEVELOPER HAS DONE SO MANY THINGS TO IMPROVE THE PROJECT SINCE THE LAST MEETING WISH THE PROJECT WAS IMPROVED. JUST LIKE TO REMIND YOU. THIS DOES MEET THE COM PLANNED. HE HAS REMOVED 24 UNITS OF RENTAL INCOME AND REDUCED THE DENSITY VOLUNTARILY AFTER AN APPROVAL TO MAKE IT LESS DANCE AND REMOVE A BUILDING. UPON COMMISSION REQUEST. THEY'VE HAD A GREEN SPACE SPORTS COURT AND A BUFFER TO THE NORTH. THEY RE COMMITTED TONIGHT TO 10% OF AFFORDABLE UNITS THAT COULD BE AUDITED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, ACCORDING YOUR MOTION. OF 17 AFFORDABLE UNITS TO THE CITY OF STUART, WHICH WE CURRENTLY DO NOT HAVE, AND WE SO BADLY NEED. WE'VE REDUCED THE PARKING TO MEET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND NOW IT HAS MORE PARKING THAN THE TYPICAL AVERAGE APPROVED PROJECT. ALSO WITH CHECK 19 BOXES FOR INCREASED DENSITY AND THE REQUIREMENTS TO EARN INCREASED DENSITY. AND THE LANDSCAPING PLAN DOES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF STUART, ALONG WITH SETBACKS IN THE BUFFERS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, MR HARDEN. IT'S A FRONT MCCHRYSTAL. GOOD EVENING. I DON'T LIVE ANYWHERE NEAR THIS PLACE, SO I DON'T HAVE A DOG IN THE HUNT. UH MIKE TO YOUR HEIGHT. LISTEN MY CHRISTMAS. HOLD IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. UM. COUPLE THINGS. I HAVE YOU THINGS I AM A BIG BIG FOREST. SEE THE FOREST KIND OF GUY. UH, I'VE SEEN A TREND OF THESE PDS. I'M NOT SURE THE STREET THAT GOES IN BETWEEN ALGAE AND THE NEW DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST. NO ID SO WEST OF COMMERCE AND THEN HEADS TOWARDS BETWEEN ALDI AND IN THE EAST SIDE OF THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT GOING IN THERE. IT SEEMS LIKE P UT. I'VE SEEN HIM. THERE'S THEY HAVE TO REPLACE X AMOUNT OF TREES. OKAY, SO THERE'S A NUMBER TO THOSE TREES. AND WHAT I'M SEEING IS MORE AND MORE TREES PACKED INTO SMALLER, SMALLER SPACES. OKAY SPECIFICALLY THAT ONE SPECIFIC SPOT. ALL RIGHT. SO YOU'VE GOT THESE? YOU'VE GOT OAK TREES, AND I THINK THERE'S SOME SORT OF NATIVE HOLLY TREES IN THERE, AND THEY'RE ALL PLANTED LIKE 12 FT. APART FROM EACH OTHER, SO RIGHT AWAY, THOSE THOSE TREES ARE NEVER GONNA BE HEALTHY IN THAT SCENARIO. EVEN WORSE. ALL THOSE TREES, THE ONLY TREES

[04:35:04]

THAT WAS SURVIVING THAT DITCH THERE IS LITERALLY A SMALL SIX FT. DITCH RIGHT? THERE WERE ALL THESE TREES ARE PLANTED TREES THAT HAVE A CHANCE OF SURVIVING AND THAT SITUATION. R CEDAR, I MEAN, YEAH. CYPRUS, THAT'S IT, SO. AND THIS THIS ALSO I MEAN, YOU KNOW, THEY LOOK, IT LOOKS BEAUTIFUL ON THEIR PRESENTATIONS. ALL RIGHT, BUT. PACKING MILLIONS OF TREES AND SMALL SPACES. IT'S JUST IT'S JUST NOT ACCOMPLISHING ANYTHING. ALSO, TRAFFIC. UM.

YOU TALK ABOUT THE CAPACITY OF CENTRAL PARKWAY ITSELF. THAT'S LIKE. THAT'S IRRELEVANT. THAT'S LIKE A RED HERRING. OKAY, DON'T TALK ABOUT IT BECAUSE. ALL THAT DENSITY IS GOING TO PLACES IT'S GONNA DUMP INTO CANTOR WAS GONNA DUMP IN THE U. S ONE. YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE A CITY HAVE THROWN UP HER HANDS AND SAID, HEY, WILL BE A PARKING LOT, SO TO HECK WITH IT. LET'S JUST GO WITH THE FLOW. RIGHT? UH I HOPE NOT SO. AND AS FAR AS WALK ABILITY. I MEAN, THERE'S NO ANY PERSON LIVING THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT HAS TO DRIVE SOMEWHERE FOR GOODS AND SERVICES. THERE'S NO GROCERY STORE THERE. THERE'S NO. WITHOUT GETTING ON CANADA, US ONE. THERE'S NO GOODS OR SERVICES. SO TO USE THE CAPACITY LEFT OVER ON CENTRAL PARKWAY AS BEING REAL IT FOR ANYTHING. IT'S NOT ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE ON KURT? DID YOU RECEIVE A CARD FROM SOMEONE ELSE'S OKAY? IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC HOME LIKE TO SPEAK IN ITEM NUMBER 22. THANK YOU FOR. YES. GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES. YES THIS IS KAREN HALL, 17, OR ARMS UP WITH PALM CITY ROAD. I DEFINITELY DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT ON I WOULD LIKE FOR AND I'VE ASKED MR FREEMAN SINCE OCTOBER. CAN WE GET LIKE A LIST LIKE THAT? LINDA KING RICHARD'S PEOPLE WE NEED TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. WHEN YOU WALK INTO CITY HALL YOU TO THE SECOND FLOOR RIGHT BY THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THERE'S MAPS, AND THERE IS THE FUTURE PROJECTED LAND USED. THE LATEST ONE IS 2017. NOW I UNDERSTAND. MR FREEMAN IS BUSY AND CAN'T GET IT ON THE WEBSITE FOR ALL THE RESIDENTS, BUT WE WANT THAT. WE WANT THIS FUTURE PROPOSED LAND USES FOR EVERYTHING THAT THE PEOPLE THAT JUST BOUGHT INTO SEASIDE HOMES THAT NOW THEY HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS. THE LOSS AND WHAT WE'RE DOING ON CENTRAL PARKWAY. I MEAN, IT'S OUTRAGEOUS. PEOPLE ARE GETTING UPSET AND WHAT WILL CALM THE PEOPLE DOWN IS TO TERRACE WHAT IS GOING ON? SO YES, THIS LOVE IT'S A GREAT IDEA, BUT 2005 THAT WAS WELL BEFORE THE MARKET CRASH. THAT WAS WALL BEFORE COVE IT COME ON. THE PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE PLANNED AND THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. I THINK WE SHOULD JUST PUT A LITTLE MORATORIUM ON GROWTH TILL WE CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON, AND I FEEL BAD FOR THE SEASIDE. OUR TOWN'S PEOPLE THAT BOUGHT AND NOW THEY'RE PUTTING IN THESE LOSS. LET'S GET TOGETHER ON THIS. MR FREEMAN NEEDS TO PUT UP SOME NEW MAPS AND LET US KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS FOR ALL THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO FOR US TO HELP US NOT BECOME FORT LAUDERDALE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. NO OTHER NO OTHER PERSON ON ZOO, MR. HUH? NO OTHER COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS.

QUESTION. ANY OF THE QUESTIONS. OKAY, SO WE'LL CALL THE QUESTION. ADAM FIRST. I HAVE COMMISSIONER MCDONALD. YES, COMMISSIONER MEYER? YES COMMISSIONER BRUNER? YES, ICE MAYOR MATHESON. NO MAYOR CLARKE NO. YES. PASSES THREE TO THANK THANK YOU. IF PEOPLE HAVE TO LEAVE FOR A LITTLE BIT. I HAVEN'T TAKEN A BREAK, BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE A BREAK NOW, SO WE'RE GOING TO CALL RIGHT ON INTO THE ITEM NUMBER. 23. THIS IS THE FIRST READING OFF. UM. VARIANCE REQUEST. WE'LL JUST GIVE ABOUT ANOTHER 15 OR 20, SECONDS AND MR MARTEL.

[23.

VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE UPLAND BUFFER DISTANCE TO SIGNIFICANT WETLAND RESOURCES AND FRONT YARD SETBACK (RC):

REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 5.03.02.C.1 AND 4, FOR A REDUCED MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER DISTANCE FROM OUTSTANDING WETLAND RESOURCES, REDUCED AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER, REDUCED CONSTRUCTION SETBACK FROM WETLANDS, AND FROM SECTION 2.04.01, REDUCED FRONT SETBACK FOR A LOT ON INDIAN GROVE IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE A DUPLEX.

]

[04:40:15]