[CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:02]
I'M SUPPOSED TO BE DOING OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE MEETING. I GUESS TO ORDER YEAH.
UM MARK, I'LL DO OR YOU'RE DOING REAL CALL, OKAY? CHARLIE GREEN. YOUR BOARD MEMBER OF ITALY. BOARD MEMBER BROWNFIELD HERE. PORT MEMBER STRONG HERE FOR MEMBER MASSING. REMEMBER MATTERS. YEAH. I AGREE. WE STILL DO THE PLEDGE. STAND FOR THE PLEDGE. OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AS TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. WANT ME. UNDER INDIVIDUAL WITH.
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
OKAY WE HAVE BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF THE MINUTES FROM OUR LAST MEETING ON APRIL 29TH AND THE MINUTES FROM APRIL EIGHT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS? MOVE APPROVAL FOR BOTH SECOND MINUTES IN FAVOR. UH, ANY OPPOSED ALREADY. CHAIR WE DO NEED TO A POINT OF BASE CHAIR[
Appointment of Local Planning Agency Board Member to Vice Chair.
]TO THE BOARD AS WELL. CRISTINA DE LA VEGA IS NO LONGER ON THE BOARD. ALRIGHT, I NOMINATE BILL MATTERS. I NOMINATE MARGARET. A SECOND. WHY DO YOU WANT TO DO IT? UH FIRST I'LL DO IT. OKAY YOUR FEET WET. YES OKAY. THROW ME YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? THAT'S IT. OH CHAIRMAN WILL NEVER BE LOST, NOT BE HERE. WELL, I'M JUST GONNA START PAYING ATTENTION NOW. THERE YOU GO. OR YOU HAVE LOVELY JORDAN OR MIKE WILL TELL YOU WHAT TO DO ANYWAY, RIGHT ALL IN FAVOR.
I ANY POST? OKAY, FANTASTIC. UH AND YOU KNOW THERE IS NOT I DON'T HAVE AN ORDER TO THE MEETING IN FRONT OF ME, SO I JUST FOLLOW HERE? YES. WAIT A MINUTE. HOW DID YOU GET THAT NIGHT? RENTED IT OUT. OH, THANK YOU, OKAY. NEXT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. WE JUST DID
[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
THAT. OH, NO. THE AGENDA. EXCUSE ME. ALL RIGHT. YOU GUYS ALL HAVE A COPY OF THE AGENDA THAT WAS PROVIDED AHEAD OF TIME. WITH ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS. BODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. WHAT ARE WE A PRIVILEGE? THE AGENDA. THE AGENDA. MOVE APPROVAL. WE YEAH.OH UH, SECOND HIGH SECOND ALL IN FAVOUR. ALRIGHT, MAYBE A POST OKAY, GREAT. SO WE JUST DID THE APPROVAL MINUTES. ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON NON AGENDA ITEMS. WE HAVE TO ASK VIA ZOOM AS WELL. ANYBODY OUT THERE? I'M HERE. AND I EVEN BEFORE I STARTED, I SAID, IS THE ATTORNEY PRESENT. DID WE NEED HIM TO BE PRESENT? MANY COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS ON ON AGENDA ITEMS. NO NOW YOU CAN MOVE TO YOUR FIRST ACTION ITEM. OKAY, GREAT. SO WE'RE
[2.
(Request item be continued to October 14, 2021 or sooner by special meeting, if available)
ORDINANCE 2472-2021; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THEREBY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM “COMMERCIAL” TO “MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL” FOR A 9.43 ACRE PARCEL ANNEXED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1527-97, OWNED BY TED GLASRUD ASSOCIATES FL LLC, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SE INDIAN STREET AND SE COMMERCE AVENUE, SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED; AND FURTHER PROVIDING THAT SAID LANDS SHALL CONCURRENTLY BE REZONED FROM COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT “CPUD” TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT “RPUD” ON THE CITY’S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; ESTABLISHING THE SILVERTHORN RPUD CONSISTING OF EIGHTY SIX (86) ATTACHED HOMES; APPROVING A MASTER SITE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT, DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
]MOVING TO THE FIRST ACTION ITEM. YES SIR. YES CHAIR. WE'RE CRESTING. THIS ITEM BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER. THE 14TH. OKAY, 21. L P A, UM. THAT WILL BE TO THE DATE CERTAIN OF OCTOBER. 14 22 1 IF IT CAN'T MAKE THAT. THEN WE MAY NEED A SPECIAL MEETING BUT THAT WOULD NEED TO BE ADVERTISED. THAT APPLICATION WOULD NEED TO BE ADVERTISING WHAT TO GO TO THAT NEW OKAY? IS ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS? BELIEVE I STILL NEED A MOTION TO MOVE IT TO THE NEXT. NOBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR IT TO BE MOVED TO THE NEXT MEETING. SUMMER.
SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. UH, ANY APPROACH. OKAY? IT WILL BE MOVED TO THE NEXT MEETING. ITEM
[1.
ORDINANCE 2473-2021: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF STUART AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ADDING ELEMENT 12 - A NEW PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT; AMENDING ELEMENT 1 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
]NUMBER TWO. THANK YOU. CHAIR. THIS IS MY OPPORTUNITY TO INTRODUCE ERIN TODAY. WHO'S UH, NEW SENIOR PLANNER. AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND SHE WILL BE PRESENTING THIS ITEM.
GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU HEAR ME A PACK? DID I JUST HAVE THE LIGHT? OH OKAY. JUST CHECKING. UM GOOD EVENING. AS CAF SAID, MY NAME IS ERIN WILLETT COME A SENIOR PLANNER. WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE MATTER BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS ORDINANCE 2473 2021. THIS IS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW ELEMENT WITHIN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. AS
[00:05:02]
REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATE STATUTE AS WELL AS AN AMENDMENT OF ELEMENT ONE WHICH IS THE FUTURE LAND YOU, SOLOMON. SO AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY, THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN FLORIDA STATE STATUTE 163.3177 REQUIRES THAT THE CITY OF STEWART ESTABLISHED PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ADDITIONALLY WE HAVE AN EXISTING POLICY WITHIN OUR FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT IN REGARD TO PROPERTY, PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND SO WE'RE RELOCATING THAT POLICY TO THE NEW ELEMENT AND STRIKING EXISTING. THAT EXISTING LANGUAGE FROM THE EXISTING FUTURE LANDY SALOMON. AND FURTHERMORE WE'RE RESOLVING AN EXISTING ISSUE WHICH WITHIN THE TABLE OF FUTURE LAND USE IS WITHIN ELEMENT ONE BY REMOVING THE MANDATORY REQUIREMENT TO HAVE 25% OF RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE MARINE AND INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. AND INCREASING THE NON RESIDENTIAL LIMIT FROM 75% TO 100% IT'S REALLY A HOUSEKEEPING ITEM, AND I'LL SHOW YOU THE CHART IN A SECOND. SO HERE'S THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTE THAT REQUIRES THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO INCLUDE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. AND WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE HAVE TAKEN THE MODEL ELEMENT DRAFTED FROM THE 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, UH, TAKEN THAT INTO ACCOUNT WHEN WE HAVE DRAFTED THIS ELEMENT, UM. TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATE LAW AND REALLY 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA. WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO IS, UM. UH IT'S TO PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY AND INCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC INTO LOCAL PLANNING PRACTICES. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO DO THAT AS WELL. UM THE NEXT TO ITEMS WHICH I JUST PREVIOUSLY KIND OF LET YOU GUYS KNOW ABOUT WAS THE CRAFT CROSSROAD REFERENCING FROM THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. AND, UM. THIS CHART BELOW HERE SHOWS THE MARINE INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE. AND YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE CHANGED IT FROM 0 TO 100% AS OPPOSED TO 0 TO 75% AND SO THAT'S JUST A MINOR HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS. AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL. IF I CAN JUST GO INTO THE TABLE WHILE WE HAVE IF YOU IF YOU DO GO CAN WE GO BACK TO THE TABLE? YOU CAN SEE THAT IT. HAVING THEIR 0 TO 25 0 TO 75 MAKES IT ALMOST MANDATORY. WELL, IT MAKES IT MANDATORY THAT YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THE MARINE INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE. AND IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES, RESIDENTIAL WILL NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE USERS IN MARINE INDUSTRIAL, UM. DO YOU KNOW WHY THAT WAS ORIGINALLY THERE? I THINK IT'S JUST IT'S A SCRIVEN AS ERROR. ALL OF THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES HAVE THAT. 100% IN THERE AT SOME POINT, AND SO. UM WE FOUND IT AS WE WERE DOING THIS PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT, AND IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY. TO AMENDED AS IT'S WITHIN THE SAME SECTION THAT WE'RE AMENDING FOR THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT. AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY COMMENTS? PUBLIC COMMENT. ANYONE ON THE BOARD COMING JUST A QUESTION. THE. ALRIGHT SO NOW THIS IS PUT IT IN CONFORMANCE WITH, UH, COMMERCIAL. I DON'T. I THINK COMMERCIAL CAN HAVE ZERO TO WRITE. CORRECT YES, INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL. ALL OF THE FUTURE LAND USES. ALLOW ZERO TO WELL, NOT ALL OF THE FEW CHALLENGES FUTURE LAND USERS WHICH ALLOW RESIDENTIAL WITHIN THEM. DON'T MAKE IT MANDATORY. USUALLY RESIDENTIAL IS IN THERE UNLESS IT'S A RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. UM COMMERCIAL HAS A 02. 30% I BELIEVE. UM WITH 100% COMMERCIAL, SO IT'S AH. I WOULD SAY IT'S MORE LIKE A SCRIVEN AS ERROR WITHIN THE TABLE THAT. THE MATH DOESN'T WORK OUT. YOU HAVE TO HAVE 25% RESIDENTIAL. IT DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE ZERO RESIDENTIAL EVEN THOUGH IN THE TABLE, IT SAYS ZERO BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY HAVE 75. COME ON.ANYONE. ALSO MANY OTHER QUESTIONS. MOVE APPROVAL. ONE SECOND SECOND. AND YOU NEED TO DO A ROLL CALL, BUT IT'S NOT MONEY SO. SAY ALL IN FAVOUR ALL IN FAVOUR. ALRIGHT, I SUPPOSE.
RIGHT? THANK YOU. AND THEN DO YOU HAVE ANOTHER ADDITIONAL STAFF UPDATE. UH STUFF. UPDATE
[STAFF UPDATE]
I DON'T KNOW IF THE COMMISSION SORRY THE BOARD ARE AWARE THAT THE COSTCO UM. KIND OF P U D WAS APPROVED BY CITY COMMISSION. LAST MONTH. UM BUT WE'RE STILL GOING THROUGH THE[00:10:06]
APPEAL. WAITING PROCESS AND I THINK THERE'S APPEAL BEING LODGED. TODAY. UM. I WOULD SAY WE'RE STILL SEEING A HEAVY LOAD OF APPLICATIONS COMING IN. IT'S STILL BUSY OUT THERE, SO EXPECT TO BE BUSY YOURSELVES. THAT.HOW LONG DID THAT PROCESS USUALLY TAKES? YEAH. SLEEP. HE IS. THIS CREATED. PROCEDURES.
SO AS PART OF THIS, COULD THEY CALL ANY OF US FROM OUR INITIAL DECISIONS INTO PLAY. THIS IS AND. IT'S ISN'T RELATIVE.
WE'RE JUST WE'RE JUST AN ADVISORY BOARD ANYWAY, RIGHT? SO IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT OUR OPINION WAS. GAVE IT SO. NOTHING ELSE. THE MOTION TO ADJOURN. WAS ADJOURNED.
[00:15:06]
BECKETT. YEAH ALL IN FAVOUR. ALRIGHT HIGH ANY OPPOSED? NO* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.