[Call To Order]
[00:00:12]
MATHESON MAYOR OF THE CITY OF STEWART, IT'S JANUARY 24TH 2022. AT LET'S SEE. 5 50 75 57 PM WHERE? HERE AT CITY HALL, 1 21, SOUTHWEST FLAGLER AVENUE CITY OF STEWART, AND I'M CALLING TO ORDER THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING. MS KENDALL, WILL YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? MAYOR MATHESON HERE. THANKS. MARY MCDONALD. YOUR COMMISSIONER BRUNER. HERE COMMISSIONER CLARK HERE, MR MEYER HERE. PLEASE RISE WITH ME. AND AS WE SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES. TO THE REPUBLIC, WHICH IS STILL ONE NATION UNDERD JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. I'LL MOVE ON TO COMMENTS BY MY CITY COMMISSIONERS. GET ON IT. UM, ON
[COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONERS]
HERE. YES, WE DO THAT. WE'LL HAVE. WE'LL HAVE COMMENTS FIRST . IF WE HAVE ANY COMMISSIONERS THAT LIKE TO MAKE COMMENTS. NICE MAYOR. OKAY OKAY. YOU GO FIRST. GO AHEAD. OH, YOU'RE BLIND.OKAY? I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY THAT WE HAD TO WALK THIS LAST WEEKEND WITH, UM THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AS A CONSULTANT FOR THE CITY. ON THE. THESE SHORT AREA FOR THE PROPOSED IDEAS, TOO. GET THE CODE CHANGE AND TO DEAL WITH SOME ISSUES IN THAT AREA, AS WELL AS A CREEK DISTRICT. AND I THINK THAT THAT WAS WELL ATTENDED. AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING MORE COMMUNITY. UH HUH. INVOLVEMENT AND WE APPRECIATE INVOLVEMENT, AND I THINK WE JUST HAD A MEETING BEFORE THIS WHERE SOMEONE MENTIONED YOUNG PEOPLE. I THINK PASTOR GORE UM MAYBE THAT'S A GOOD TIME TO BRING THIS UP. BECAUSE ONE TIME IT'S GWENDOLYN BRINKLEY HAD BROUGHT UP THAT WE NEEDED TO MY TEAM WAS MR BRINKLEY TO RECOGNIZE PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY, AND I THINK JUST A WORD THAT PASSED THE GORE DOES WITH THE CLEANUP AND EVERYTHING. I JUST WANT TO THANK HIM AND FOR THE INVOLVEMENT AND INSPIRATION THAT HE GIVES TO THE YOUNG PEOPLE. UM I REALLY APPRECIATE HIM JUST DOING THIS OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. IT'S LIKE A THANKLESS TESTS, BUT HE DOES IT SO WELL, SO THAT SO MUCH APPRECIATED. I'M GOING TO RESERVE MY OTHER COMMENTS BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY OTHER THINGS TO DISCUSS, AND WE'RE STARTING LATE. OKAY FIRST OF ALL , WE HAD A THE OTHER DAY AT THE MARTIN LUTHER KING PARADE, WHICH, BY THE WAY, IT WAS PROBABLY ONE OF THE BEST MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY PARADES THAT WE'VE HAD IN A LONG TIME. IT WAS A GREAT TURNOUT. LOT OF VEHICLES. A LOT OF LOT OF STUFF GOING ON A LOT OF GOOD EVENT.
BUT WHILE THERE I SPOKE WITH A BOARD MEMBER OF THE L, A AT WYNDHAM MIRROR, AND AS MANY PEOPLE KNOW THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT FIRE STATION LOCATIONS, AND ONE OF THEM IS UP NEAR THE WINDOW MIRROR. UM, DEVELOPMENT. AND THERE'S A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT A POSSIBLE FIRE STATION IN THAT LOCATION. THERE'S ALSO A LOT OF, UNFORTUNATELY SOME MISINFORMATION THAT'S BEEN DISTRIBUTED TO THE WINDOW MIRROR H AWAY. UM I AFTER SPEAKING WITH HIM, I'M GOING TO REACH OUT TO THE TO HIM AND WORK WITH DAVID AND WITH CHIEF FELICIAN TO SET UP A TOWN HALL MEETING WITH THE WINDERMERE H AWAY TO DISCUSS. FIRE RESCUE DISCUSSED STATION THREE DISCUSS WHY WE'RE DOING IT ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS HERE THEIR QUESTIONS AND THEN GET BACK TO THEM WITH ANSWERS. TO HOPEFULLY RESOLVE SOME OF THOSE ISSUES. ON THAT NOTE STATION THREE. WE NEED TO. WE NEED TO GET MOVING AND INSIGHT THAT LOCATION. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO OUR GUYS ARE DOING A GREAT JOB UP THERE AT THE PARK. AH BUT WE DEFINITELY NEED TO WE. WE'VE GOT A GREAT FIREFIGHTERS. WE'VE GOT A GREAT ARCHES, STAFF AND EVERYBODY OVER THERE ARE ENTIRE PLAYER. PUBLIC SAFETY, INCLUDING OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT IS DOING A FABULOUS JOB. AND SO WE NEED TO GET WORKING ON THAT. AND THEN FINALLY, THE LAST THING IS, I WANT TO, UH EXPLORE THE IDEA OF SOMETHING WE'VE DISCUSSED IN THE PAST, BUT FAR AS FIRE RESCUE AND THAT IS FOR OUR NEXT COMING BUDGET, EXPLORE THE IDEA OF
[00:05:03]
ADDING DISPATCH, HAVING OUR OWN DISPATCH, IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OUR OWN FIRE DEPARTMENT COVERS THE ENTIRE CITY. WE NEED TO HAVE OUR OWN DISPATCH. JUST LIKE WE DO WITH OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT.THERE IS A COST TO IT. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO EVALUATE THAT COST AND THE FEASIBILITY OF IT, BUT I THINK IT'S ALL PART OF THE PACKAGE OF HAVING HER OWN FIRE DEPARTMENT. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. ANY OTHER COMMENTS COMING FROM MICHAEL. THANK YOU, MAYOR. UM JUST TWO THINGS. ONE UM, THERE WAS A FLORAL MEGACITIES ALERT OUT TODAY. ACTUALLY, ONE OF THE RARE INSTANCES WHERE THE LEAGUE IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE BILL. UM THIS IS, UH, IT'S A HOUSE BILL, ONE OF FIVE. PUT FORWARD BY REPRESENTATIVE RANDY FINE AND SENATE BILL 2 24 BY GROUPERS.
SENATOR GREETERS. INTERESTINGLY SOMETIMES THESE ARE THE FOLKS THAT AUTHORED THE BAD BILLS THAT WE USUALLY OPPOSED. BUT THIS IS A THIS IS A GOOD ONE, AND I THINK IT'S WORTH BRINGING FORWARD AT A FUTURE. AT THE NEXT MEETING. IF WE CAN PUT A LETTER RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THIS IS REGULATION OF SMOKING BY COUNTIES, MUNICIPALITIES, AND IT SEEMS TO HAVE SOME GOOD MOVEMENT IN THE LEGISLATURE. IT'S GOT COMMITTEE HEARINGS. AND ESSENTIALLY, THIS WOULD ALLOW ALLOW LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO REGULATE SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES. IF WE MAY CHOOSE TO DO THAT, WHETHER THAT BE OUR PARKS , UM, YOU KNOW, OR, YOU KNOW, IN OTHER CASES LIKE THE BEACH, FOR INSTANCE, SO THE LEAGUE IS SUPPORTIVE OF THAT I'M PERSONALLY I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THAT. THE HOME RULE ASPECT IS HOME RUN, AND SO I WOULD ASK THAT WE STAFF BRING THAT FORWARD FOR NEXT. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING YOU HERE. YEAH AND THEN THE SECOND PART. AGAIN WE JUST HAD A SIERRA MEETING WHERE WE WERE LOOKING AT A LONG COMING DESIGN OF GUY DAVIS PARK SPORTS COMPLEX. VERY GREAT LOOKING DESIGN. EXCITING TO THINK ABOUT THE FUTURE OF A BIG INVESTMENT RIGHT IN THE CENTER OF OUR COMMUNITY, BUT A LOT OF LOT OF CONTINUED COMMENTS ABOUT THE DESPERATE NEED FOR HOUSING. AND I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME. AND IT'S CONCERNING TO ME THAT YOU KNOW OUR COMMUNITY IS SO DESPERATE FOR HOUSING THAT YOU KNOW WE'RE WE CAN'T EVEN WE CAN'T EVEN THINK ABOUT GREAT PART BECAUSE WE'RE SO DESPERATE FOR HOUSING. AND SO THE FACT THAT YOU KNOW WE'VE WE'VE GOT TO WALK INTO A GUN AT THE SAME TIME. WE'VE GOT TO WORK ON INVESTMENTS IN OUR COMMUNITY WHERE WE CAN, BUT YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO CONTINUE THINKING ABOUT WHAT WE CAN DO WITH HOUSING. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT A YOU KNOW, INCLUSIONARY ZONING ORDINANCE, WHICH THE COMMISSION IS NOT IN FAVOR OF, UM I WANT TO START PUTTING SOME IDEAS TOGETHER AROUND THE FACT THAT WE DO HAVE ARTE FUNDS ALLOCATED FOR HOUSING . WE HAVE THEM LARGELY IN A YOU KNOW, AND A BUCKET THAT WE'VE RESERVED AND SO I'D LIKE TO START HAVE A START REALLY THINKING ABOUT WHAT IS POSSIBLE FOR US AS A SMALL GOVERNMENT TO DO WHETHER THAT BE BUYING UP PROPERTIES AND WORKING WITH DEVELOPERS THAT CAN PUT AFFORDABLE, TRULY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPERTIES. IN PLACE. WE CAN'T. WE CAN'T BUILD A HOUSE FOR EVERYBODY. I WISH WE COULD, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT WE JUST CAN'T. FOR WHAT CAN WE DO? THERE'S THERE ARE THINGS THAT WE CAN DO. AND MAYBE THE CODE ISN'T THE RIGHT APPROACH. BUT WE'VE GOT THAT PART OF MONEY FROM OUR PAPA. DEDICATED TO HOUSING. I WANT US TO START REALLY THINKING WHETHER IT BE A WORKSHOP IN THE COMING MONTHS. HOW CAN WE MAKE SURE WE LEVERAGE THOSE FUNDS AS EFFECTIVELY AS POSSIBLE? SOMETHING BEYOND JUST THE STANDARD. HERE'S A CHECK TO HELP YOU PAY RENT. WE CAN DO SOMETHING. BRICKS AND MORTAR. I REALLY BELIEVE IT. SO I'D LIKE JUST TO START REALLY THINKING ABOUT THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT MONEY RIGHT THERE, AND WE NEED TO PUT IT TO GOOD USE. THANKS. I DO HAVE A COMMENT. REGARDING THE WALK WE HAD SATURDAY, PEOPLE THAT CAME OUT IN THE STEWART AND WALKED WITH US. THAT'S SO IMPORTANT. TO BE A PART OF THAT. AND THERE WAS THREE LADIES THERE ON THE TRIM. THEY THEY TREATMENT AROUND WITH THIS, AND I THINK IT'S PEOPLE THAT MOST OF YOU KNOW, BUT IT REALLY IMPRESSED ME. AND THESE ARE LADIES THAT JUST KEEP GOING. THEY DON'T GIVE UP. THEY JUST KEEP GOING AND BEING APART. WAS MISUNDERSTOOD. THURLOW WAS THERE. AND JULIE PRIEST. GOSH, SHE DOES SO MUCH. AND THEN CHRISTY LEE ROBERTS WAS THERE AND MISS MISS PARLE, MISS PEARL CLARK. I LOVE HER AND WE WERE MISSING OUR FIFTH ONE, WHICH IS HELEN BACK THERE. BUT THESE ARE WOMEN THAT JUST NOT 10 YEARS 20 YEARS. 30 YEARS 40 YEARS, YOU KNOW, THEY JUST DO WHATEVER THEY CAN NOT IN JUST ONE COMMUNITY, SEVERAL COMMUNITIES ALL OF OUR COMMUNITIES. SO ANYWAY, THANK YOU FOR LET ME SAY SOMETHING. ABSOLUTELY, UM I'LL TRY AND BE
[00:10:07]
SHORTENS WHEAT, BUT THAT'S SOMETIMES HARD AS THE MAYOR. LAKE OKEECHOBEE IS CURRENTLY AT 15.11 FT. THE ARMY CORPS HOSTED A LISTENING SESSION TODAY I WILL TOUCH BASE. THAT SESSION BEGAN AT THAT. 2 30 UNTIL FOUR O'CLOCK , YOU KNOW IT'S THE SAME MOST OF US HERE. WE'RE IN THE ROOM FOR THE C R A MEETING. I'LL TOUCH BASE WITH, UM SOME OF THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY THAT I KNOW WE'RE IN ON THAT SESSION AND DO MY BEST TO BRIEF YOU ALL. NEXT TIME WE MEET RIVERS COALITION THIS THURSDAY AT 11 O'CLOCK WILL HAVE A VIRTUAL MEETING. UM WE ARE AT 15.11 FT BETTER THAN WE WERE A YEAR AGO WITH LAKE HEIGHT BY ROUGHLY HALF A FOOT OR SO. THE CITY OF STEWART WOULD LIKE TO PUT A TREE. IN THE 1ST 12 FT OF EVERY PROPERTY OWNERS YARD FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT LIVED IN THE EAST STEWART COMMUNITY. NOT ONLY WOULD WE LIKE TO PUT A LARGE, NATIVE MATURE TREE IN YOUR YARD AND INSTALL IT, WE WOULD LIKE TO WATER IT FOR 90 DAYS. WHAT WE NEED ARE PEOPLE PROPERTY OWNERS TO FILL OUT APPLICATIONS FOR THAT, UM, THE LIST OF BENEFITS TO THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC BENEFITS TO EVERYONE. COULD GO ON AND ON, PLEASE CONTACT MYSELF OR MISS PANEL. GANDHI SOLVED US IF YOU HAVE ANY INTEREST OR KNOW OF ANYONE IN THE EAST STEWART COMMUNITY WHO WOULD LIKE A LARGE NATIVE MATURE TREE. PUT IN YOUR YARD AND WATERED FOR 90 DAYS. UM THE WALKTHROUGH EAST STEWART AND THE CREEK DISTRICT WAS WONDERFUL.UM, THANK YOU, MAYOR. FORMER MAYOR CLARKE PREFER ACKNOWLEDGING, UM. PASTOR GORE AND ALL HE DOES WITH, UM TIME AND TIME AGAIN. AH TRASH PICKUPS . UM HE AND I DISCUSSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING THE MORNING BEFORE THE WALK THROUGH E. STEWART TO DISCUSS FORM BASED CODE AND POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS THERE. AND AS WE HEARD IN THE PRESENTATION, AND COMMISSIONER MEYER BROUGHT UP THERE IS A NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND I'D LIKE TO SHARE WITH SOME OF MY COMMISSIONERS, A LITTLE OF KIND OF SOME THOUGHTS THAT I HAVE, AND MAYBE WE CAN ALL MULL IT OVER AND YOU KNOW, DISCUSS WITH STAFF AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY, BUT I CONSTANTLY HEAR ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING A LOT FROM THAT EASTER COMMUNITY. AS WE ALL KNOW, THERE ARE A LOT OF UNDEVELOPED LOTS THERE. MOST OF THEM ARE PLOTTED AT 50 FT. WIDE OR SO, UM THE BIG PUSH THAT I HEAR FROM ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS FOR MEMBERS OF THAT COMMUNITY. AND SO ONE OF MY THOUGHTS IS AS WHEN WE ARE DOING THIS OF WAYS TO FACILITATE BUILDING IN THAT COMMUNITY WITH REEVALUATING OUR CODE. BUT PERHAPS WE COULD TAKE IT A STEP FURTHER WORK WITH OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT COME UP WITH A FEW. AH PLANS THREE OR FOUR PLANS AND DISCUSS WITH FIVE OR 10 CONTRACTORS AROUND TOWN. AND KIND OF LOOK AT EASING THE COST FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER ON HAVING SOMETHING BUILT THERE AND COME UP WITH A FEW MORE BENEFITS. THAT WE COULD OFFER TO REDUCE THOSE COSTS. IN EXCHANGE, WE WOULD WORK WITH A LOCAL NONPROFIT. I'M JUST GOING TO USE FOR EXAMPLES. ANY NONPROFIT THAT'S FOCUSED IN THE AREA ON A AFFORDABLE HOUSING SAY SO COUNCIL LIKE THAT OR SOMETHING, AND WE WOULD WORK WITH THAT COUNCIL. THEY WOULD PROVIDE A TENANT POOL. IN WHICH AND THEY WOULD REGULATE THAT TENANT POOL. AND. PROVIDE THOSE TO THE HOMEOWNER WHO HAS THE BUILT HOUSE WHERE THE CITY WORKED WITH THEM ON BENEFITS, AND IF THEY WERE TO RECEIVE THOSE BENEFITS OF THE CITY'S PRESET PLANS, THE CITY'S CONTRACTORS THAT WE WORK WITH THAT HAVE ALREADY BID OUT THE HOUSE IN ANY OTHER BENEFITS . PERHAPS WE COULD DISCUSS THAT A FUTURE TIME THE READ OF BENEFIT FOR A SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. THEY WOULD AGREE TO RENT THAT HOUSE. AT A PRESET RATE. IT WOULD BE. MANAGED AND VERIFIED BY THAT LOCAL NONPROFIT. WHOSE GOAL IS TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING FROM THE COMMUNITY. SO THIS IS JUST THE THOUGHTS OF SOME PROGRAM IN WHICH WE COULD WORK TO GET SOME OF THOSE LOTS IN THAT COMMUNITY BUILT. WITH A
[00:15:03]
GUARANTEE. THAT THAT FIRST CERTAIN NUMBER OF SET YEARS THEY WOULD BE RENTED. AT A AFFORDABLE RATE. YOU KNOW, AND THAT WOULD BE MANAGED BY A LOCAL NONPROFIT . UM SO IT'S SOMETHING LIKE YOU ALL JUST TO THINK ABOUT DISCUSS. THE PROBLEMS AND BENEFITS WITH IT WITH MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY AND OUR STAFF, AND WE CAN MAYBE TALK ABOUT A DIFFERENT TIME. THIS IS REALLY THE ONLY TIME WE[COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER]
CAN TALK ABOUT STUFF THAT WE MIGHT VOTE ON IN THE FUTURE. NOW I'LL TURN OVER TO COMMENTS FROM OUR CITY MANAGER. THANK YOU, SIR . JUST REALLY QUICK ON THE RP FUNDING THAT YOU WERE SPEAKING OF MR MEYER. AT A MANAGER'S LUNCHEON THIS WEEK. THERE'S BEEN RUMOR GOING AROUND THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MAY PULL BACK THE SECOND TRANCHE OF FUNDING. SO WE WANT TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT ALLOCATING WE HAVE WE HAVE PART OF THAT ALREADY ALLOCATED FOR STORMWATER, AND WE'D HAVE TO PULL THAT BACK AS WELL. IF THAT ENDS UP HAPPENING, OF COURSE, THAT'S JUST A RUMOR. BUT YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH THAT. AND THE OTHER THING I HAVE IS HAPPY BIRTHDAY MAYOR THANK YOU. LOT MORE HOURS AT LEAST. WE HAVE AN AGENDA IN FRONT OF US OF THE AGENDAS PUBLISHED. WAS THAT[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
GOING TO PULL ANYTHING? NO. EVERYTHING IS OPEN. WELL I'M SORRY. I'M NOT PUTTING IT AT NUMBER TWO. YOU TELL ME. I DON'T . I DON'T HAVE MY AGENDA FOR SALT. NO. THE PRESIDENT SAID.YES I AM PULLING ON ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE OKAY? YES I'M PULLING OUT OF NUMBER TWO FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. UH LIKE COMMISSIONER CLARK FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PULLING ITEM NUMBER TWO SECONDS. TAYLOR PROPERTY AND A SECOND. BIKE COMMISSIONER MEYER FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. PULLING ITEM NUMBER TWO. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION? WE'VE ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. I HIGH MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE HAVE ANY
[COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (3 Minutes Max.)]
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? YES, I HAVE. GWENDOLYN HALL BRINKLEY. MR BRINKLEY. MHM. GOOD EVENING.GOOD EVENING. OKAY. I JUST WANT TO GO BACK. 12 LAST MEETING. UM I DIDN'T MAKE MY STATEMENT THEN BECAUSE I WAS TRYING. I WAS LIFE TRYING TO GET THIS INFORMATION OUT TO THOSE NOT PRESENT. BUT I LIKE THE IDEA. OF THE PARK. I LIKE WHAT I SAW. UM PRODUCES START HERE. SOMETHING ABOUT THE STATE. AND THERE'S A STAGE THERE NOW, AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL ARE AWARE THAT THAT STAGE WAS PUT UP BY MR. WAIT MORE. NOT MISTAKEN. HE PAID FOR IT OUT OF HIS OWN PARTY. SO ALL I'M SAYING IS, JACK, IF YOU MOVE THAT STAGE OR IF YOU REBUILD THAT STAGE, ASKING THAT EITHER WAY, THE STAGE BE DEDICATED TO MR MORE WAY MORE. I ALSO WANT TO COMMENT ON A STATEMENT BY MR CAMPAIGN.
MOST OF CAMPAIGN HAVE MADE A STATEMENT. WHEN HE SAID THAT THING. PRESENTATION WAS JUST.
FOR THEM IN THERE. IT WAS THE FIRST PHASE. AND FOR US TO JUST SIT BACK AND LET IT PLAY OUT.
WELL, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, THE NBA TOLD O'BRIEN JAMES, THAT JUST DRIBBLES CHATEAU, MR CAMPAIGN. WE'RE NOT SHEDDING LOOK. I THINK THE COMMUNITY'S NEEDS TO VOICE THEIR OPINION, EVERYTHING, EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IN THEIR COMMUNITY. THAT'S THE ONLY WAY THEY'RE GOING TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON, AND THAT'S THE ONLY WAY THAT THEY'RE GOING TO KNOW THAT YOU'RE PAYING THEM ANY ATTENTION AND LISTENING TO THEM. NOW I'M DONE WITH THAT STATEMENT AND MR CAMPAIGN. NOW I JUST HEARD YOU TALKING ABOUT HOUSING. AND. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE A QUIET PROPERTY IN HIS STORY. DUE TO LINK LEANS ON PROPERTY. BUT I'M ASKING THAT IF THE CITY HAVE ACQUIRED ANY PROPERTY BY THE WAY OF LINKING THAT YOU WOULD. EASE UP ON THOSE LINES. AND ALLOW RESIDENTS TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY. SO THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO BUILD THEMSELVES.
INSTEAD OF DONATING IT TO OUR SELLING IT TO HABITAT. I COULDN'T HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. I DON'T KNOW FOR A FACT. BUT I FEEL LIKE THERE'S SOME PROVISIONS MADE WHEN HABITAT
[00:20:05]
GETS IT. I'M JUST ASKING THAT INSTEAD YOU THINK ABOUT THE COMMUNITY AND MAYBE EASE UP ON THE LANES AND SELL THE PROPERTY TO PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY, AND THAT TOO, CAN HELP THEM. TO BECOME HOMEOWNERS. AND TAKE MORE PRIDE IN YOUR COMMUNITY. AND I'M DONE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. PLEASE REMEMBER TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION WITH YOUR COMMENTS WHEN YOU'RE MAKING THEM JUST THE MAYOR JUST AS A FOLLOW UP. THE CITY CURRENTLY DOESN'T OWN ANY PROPERTY IN EASTER. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON ZOOM? I HAVE NO MORE PUBLIC COMMENT. MAYOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. MR CAMPAIGN. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RUSSIAN CAMPAIGN. WHAT I SAID WAS THIS WAS A PRELIMINARY MEETING. AND THAT. THIS IS GOING TO GO BACK TO THE COMMUNITY, AND IT'S GOING TO GO BACK TO ALL STAKEHOLDERS AND IT SHOULD GO TO ALL STAKEHOLDERS. THIS WAS NOT A FINAL PLANS. EVERYONE SHOULD COMMENT. I DID NOT SAY I WAS NOT INTERESTED IN HAVING ANYONE COMMON. SO THAT'S NOT CORRECT.AND THIS WAS A PRESENTATION AND USUALLY MR MAYOR PRESENTATIONS. TAKE THE INFORMATION. DIGEST THE INFORMATION. AND THEN A FUTURE DATE. WE HAVE A DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION ON THE PRESENTATION. THIS GOT TO BE MUCH LARGER AND THAT'S FINE. YOU YOU'RE THE CHAIR AND YOU CAN DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. BUT THAT'S WHAT I SAID. THIS WAS A PRESENTATION, NOT A FINAL DISCUSSION, NOT ANYTHING ELSE. THAT'S ALL I MEANT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS. HEARING NONE OF MY FELLOW MR MAYOR. YES, THERE IS ONE. MR BRINKLEY.
PLEASE WE'VE GOT YOU MISS BRINKLEY, PLEASE COME TO THE MICROPHONE. AH REMEMBER OUR CIVILITY PLEDGE AND PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. GOOD EVENING. I DON'T LIKE TO KNOW. WHY IS IT THE SIERRA? IS COMPOSED OF CITY COMMISSION THAT REGULAR PEOPLE.
ON THE BOARD. YOU GOT PEOPLE. THAT. MY OPINION. DON'T GO ALONG WITH YOU ALL CAUSE THEY KNOW YOU'VE BEEN THERE. SOME COMMON PEOPLE THAT NOT CONNECTED WITH YOU ALL SO WE CAN HAVE SPARE CHANGE. I DON'T THINK WE GET AND YOUR COMMUNITY. IT'S OUR COMMUNITY. AND IT SEEMED LIKE WHAT? WE WON'T. IT DON'T RESONATE WITH YOU IS WHAT YOU WANT. THAT WE TAKE YOU, SARAH.
BUT YOUR DISRESPECT. BUT WHAT? YOU WON'T FORCE THEM WHAT YOU ARE. GOD. THANK GOD. IN THE FORTUNATE WHAT YOU WANT. DOWN OUR THROATS, NOT LISTEN TO US. WE PAY Y'ALL THERE, BUT YOU IGNORE NO, I'M NOT LIKED ABOUT YOU, BUT I LOVE YOU ALL. LOT OF GOOD. THANK YOU. WE LOVE YOU, TOO. WE HAVE. ARE THERE ANY OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO MAKE A COMMENT. KIT. CAN YOU. CLICK HER IN OR MISS JAMES. MS JAMES, CAN YOU HEAR US? CAME HERE. YOU GOOD EVENING. WELL, HI , MAN. JAMES LIVE HERE IN EAST STEWART COMMUNITY. AND I JUST HAD A QUESTION. I SEE WHERE COMMISSIONER CLARK HAS SPORTS ITEMS TO TAILOR PROPERTY FUND TRANSFER. AND I JUST LIKE TO FIND OUT WHEN WILL THIS COME BACK BEFORE THE COMMISSIONERS? GOING TONIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS
[CONSENT CALENDAR]
[00:25:06]
JAMES. UM WELL NOW. VOTE ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND ITEM NUMBER TWO WILL BE DISCUSSED AFTER THAT VOTE, SO YOU WILL HEAR ITEM NUMBER TWO IN MORE DETAIL. MM, DUE TO COMMISSIONER CLARK PULLING IT. TO MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE. THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMENTS. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ADOPT THE THAT'S HIM. CALENDAR PULLING ITEM NUMBER TWO. SECOND WE HAVE EMOTIONAL APPROVAL FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR. AH BY COMMISSIONER CLARK A SECOND. I BELIEVE IT WAS BY COMMISSIONER MEYER. PULLING ITEM NUMBER TWO. ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION. HEARING ON MS KENDALL, WE PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. PACEMAKER MCDONALD. YES COMMISSIONER MEYER? YES COMMISSIONER CLARK? YES COMMISSIONER. BRUNER? YES. MAYOR MATHESON? YES. NOW WE HAVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO. THE TAILOR PROPERTY FUND TRANSFER,[2.
TAYLOR PROPERTY FUND TRANSFER (RC):
RESOLUTION No. 12-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING BUDGET AMENDMENT No. 12-2022 THEREBY TRANSFERRING $90,000 FROM THE BUILDING PERMIT FUND TO THE BUILDING DIVISION’S PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ACCOUNT TO FUND THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURES, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION OF THE FENCE ON THE TAYLOR PROPERTY ON EAST 10TH STREET; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
]WHICH IS RESOLUTION 12-2020. MR MARTELLI, PLEASE READ THE RESOLUTION. THIS IS RESOLUTION 12-2020 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER. 12 DAYS 22, THEREBY TRANSFERRING $90,000 FROM THE BUILDING PERMIT FUND TO THE BUILDING DIVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ACCOUNT. TO FUND THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURES AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION. OF A FENCE ON THE TAILOR PROPERTY ON EAST 10TH STREET, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
THANK YOU, MR AMERICAN. I JUST START THE DISCUSSION ON THE SIDE AND. BY ASKING, MR MARK, MR MORTAL THAT'S IMMORTAL. IF YOU COULD JUST EXPLAIN TO THE PUBLIC WHAT PULLING AN ITEM MEANS, SIR.
WHAT PULLING AND I DON'T MEAN FROM THE CONSENT MEANS THAT IT'S GOING TO BE DISCUSSED BY THE BOARD. INSTEAD OF STAYING ON CONSENT. THANK YOU. VIOLENCE. MR MR CLARK OR CITY MANAGER, ANDREW JUST DO A PRE FOR A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ITEM BEFORE YOU GUYS GO INTO DISCUSSION. SO THIS ITEM CAME ABOUT AS A RESULT OF A STIPULATION THAT WENT BEFORE THE CITY'S MAGISTRATE OFFICER AS IT RELATED TO AH, CODE VIOLATIONS. AGAINST THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE TAILOR PROPERTY ON THESE 10TH STREET. THE TAILOR PROPERTY HAD APPROXIMATELY JUST UNDER $400,000 AND. FINES DUE TO RE OCCURRING FINES ON THE PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO CODE VIOLATIONS . UM DURING THIS PROCESS AND DISCUSSION, I HAD OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH THE. WHAT? WHAT HE'S CALLING THE TRUST, AN EMPLOYEE OF THE TRUST. THE TAILOR TRUST IN RELATION TO THESE FINES AND TRYING TO GET THE PROPERTY REDEVELOPED. AND AS A RESULT, UM THE TRUST HAD ALSO SOUGHT OUT A DEMOLITION COMPANY TO REMOVE THE BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY. BUT DID NOT HAVE THE LIQUIDITY UPFRONT TO PAY FOR THE BUILDING DESTRUCTIONS. UM AS A RESULT, WE HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT RELIEVING THE SOFT COST FINDS. THAT WERE THERE ACCRUING FINES AND ASSESSING THE FUNDING TO DEMOLISH THE BUILDINGS AS A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY. HE TOOK THAT TO THE TAYLOR FAMILY AND HOW TO DISCUSSION WHO WERE IN AGREEMENT WITH DOING THAT? AH, THIS FUND IS COMING OUT OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENTS BUILDING FUND, WHICH WILL HAVE TO BE PAID BACK UPON LEAN SATISFACTION. AND THE FUNDING IS GOING TO THE TAILOR. TRUST THEM. THEY ARE COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE OF THE STRUCTURES. THING, SO I PULLED IT SO THAT WE COULD HAVE THAT EXPLANATION FROM STAFF. AS TO WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE TAYLOR FAMILY TRUST, WHICH IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THE ONES THAT ARE HOME IN THE DEVELOPED OR HAVING THEY'RE HOPING TO COME IN WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY, AND IN THE MEANTIME, THEY'RE TRYING TO CLEAN UP THE PROPERTY. AND HAVE IT READY FOR REDEVELOPMENT. BUT AS CITY MANAGER SAID, THERE THERE NEEDED FUNDS UP FRONT AND BASICALLY SCICOLONE TO THEM, AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY IT BACK ON THE BACK END, AND SO THE CITY IS NOT OWNING THE PROPERTY. AND HOW MUCH WAS IT LEAN? THAT WAS ON THERE WASN'T 300. IT WAS JUST UNDER 400 MILLION LITTLE BIT UNDER $400,000. AND THAT LIEN IS STILL THERE PLUS THIS $90,000, BUT WE'RE WAITING ON THE OWNERS OF THE TALE OF PROPERTY, TOO. COME IN WITH SOME TYPE OF A DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY. WHATEVER THEY'RE DOING, WHETHER THEY'RE DOING A PERIOD OF MULTI
[00:30:04]
FAMILY OR A SINGLE FAMILY OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT THEY'RE PLANNING TO DO. AND THIS IS JUST THIS PHASE. AND HOW LONG WILL IT BE? UM SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN CHARGE OF THE DEVELOPED THE DEMOLITION AND PUTTING UP THE FENCE IN WITH THAT $90,000. YES COMMISSIONER CLARK, IF I COULD, AS A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, THE LIEN WAS THE LANE THAT WE'RE REFERENCING WAS ROUGHLY 350 HAD GROWN TO ALMOST 400 TO 2 NON COMPLIANCE. BUT ALONG THE LINES OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT THAT SAID TO LAY OFF ON SOME OF THOSE LEADS AND PULL BACK. THE CITY HAS IN THE STIPULATION. THAT'S BEFORE THE COMMISSION HAS AGREED TO COMPLETELY WAIVED THAT LEAN AND REMOVE IT FROM THE PROPERTY.IF IN FACT THE CONTRACTOR COMPLETES THIS JOB OF CLEANING THE PROPERTY UP AND BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE. OKAY, UM AND SO WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT. BETWEEN. THE TAILOR PROPERTY TRUST IN THE CITY OF STEWART. AND. FOR THE $90,000 LEAN TAYLOR PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE IN CHARGE. OF REMOVAL AND OUT OF THE. EXISTING STRUCTURES AND PREPPING THE PROPERTY FOR REDEVELOPMENT. YES THEY HAD ACTUALLY GONE OUT AND FOUND THEIR OWN DEMOLITION COMPANY AND STUFF BEFORE THIS EVEN CAME UP, AND THEY HAVE AUTHORITY TO USE THEIR OWN DEMOLITION COMPANY. CREDIT? YES, MR MAYOR. MIKE UM, AND THE PROPERTY ORDER TO TAILOR TRUST? UH, WILL WE BE PAIR OF JUST $90,000 WILL BE JUST WRITING IT DOWN, MACEK, OR WILL WE BE PAYING INVOICES BEING SUBMITTED BY THE CONTRACTOR? IT'S HALF IS GOING TO BE PLAYED TO THE TRUSTEE UPFRONT. THE CITY IS NOT GOING TO BE IN IT'S NOT A PROCUREMENT BY THE CITY AT ALL, SO WE WILL NOT BE PARTICIPATING IN DISBURSEMENTS, ACCORDING TO JOB BEING PERFORMED. HALF UP FRONT AND HALF UPON COMPLETION PAID TO THE TRUST THE TRUST WILL HIRE THEM, PAY THEM DIRECTLY. AND THEN THE SECOND PAYMENT WILL NEVER COME IF THEY DON'T COMPLETE IT. AND IF THEY DON'T COMPLETE IT, THE 350 TO $400,000 . AND THEN WHAT RECOURSE WOULD WE HAVE IF THEY DON'T COMPLETE IT REGARDING THE 1ST 45 1ST HALF YOU GUYS COULD FORECLOSE ON THE PROPERTY, OKAY? THAT'S ALL ANYTHING. THANK YOU. OKAY AND THEN THE OTHER THING I WAS GOING TO SAY IF THEY DO CONTINUE WITH THIS, AND THEY GET IT DONE, MIKE. I THINK PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY ARE CONCERNED. I KNOW PEOPLE WANT TO GET RID OF EYESORES, BUT THEY ALSO THERE'S SOME PEOPLE ARE VERY ATTACHED TO ALL OF THAT OUTDOOR ACTIVITY.
PEOPLE PLAY DOMINOES. THERE, THERE. WE'RE GONNA HAVE A FENCE . WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES OF DEFENSE GOES UP. PEOPLE MIGHT STILL WANT TO GO BEHIND THERE. AND SO PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT POTENTIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES . IT'LL BE PRIVATE PROPERTY IS NOT THE CITY'S PROPERTIES SO THEY CAN PLAN TAYLOR FAMILY DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT TO DO WITH THEIR PROPERTY, OKAY. THAT'S FINE. I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR. WE WANT TO BE TRANSPARENT. WANT TO GET IT ON THE RECORD? AS FAR AS THE FENCE IS CONCERNED THAT THE TAYLORS DID HAVE SOME OBJECTION TO THE FENCE, AND SO WE ARE. WE'RE HAVING DISCUSSIONS WITH THEM ABOUT RELINQUISHING THAT PORTION OF IT AND HAVING THEM NOT PUT THE FENCE UP. ALL RIGHT, OKAY. AH WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD ON RESOLUTION? 12 2022. SECOND HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY VICE MAYOR MCDONALD AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CLARK. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION OF APPROVAL? MR. AFTER THAT, MR MAYOR, IF I CAN JUST I'M SORRY QUESTIONS, BUT THE CLEANUP. NOW IT'S. KILLER TRUST FUND, I GUESS. CUT TREES DOWN. AND NO ONE'S CLEANED UP THOSE TREES.
AND. WE'VE SENIOR CITIZENS HAVE BEEN TALKING AND WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THOSE GENTLEMEN THAT PLAYED DOMINOES ARE SENIOR CITIZENS. THEY HAVE NO PLACE EVEN THOUGH IT'S THE FAMILY WAS JUST PRIVATE PROPERTY. BUT THERE AGAIN IS WHAT I'M SAYING ABOUT THE WRECKS AND WE HAVEN'T THE GENTLEMEN, OUR SENIOR CITIZENS, WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO GO TO PLAY DIAMOND? THANK YOU.
CONVENTION. MEYER. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. OKAY, SO JUST TO BE CLEAR. WE CAN I SAY IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND VERY CLEAR LANGUAGE, SO I UNDERSTAND TOO. THERE WAS, UM, AN AGREEMENT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT WENT BEFORE OUR MAGISTRATE. WHERE THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE LOOKING TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY BECAUSE THEY OWN IT. THE TAILOR TRUST AND THERE ARE. YOU KNOW, FALLING DOWN STRUCTURES OUT OF CODE VIOLATIONS, STRUCTURES BURNED OUT STRUCTURES THERE ON THE PROPERTY. THEY WANT TO CLEAN THEM UP. THEY WANT TO DEMOLISH THEM. THEY WANT TO GET THE
[00:35:02]
PROPERTY READY FOR DEVELOPMENT. AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE FUNDS TO DO IT SO AS PART OF THE AGREEMENT WHERE ESSENTIALLY GOING TO LOAN THEM THE MONEY. THAT WILL BE. YOU KNOW, PLACED AS AN ADDITIONAL LIEN WAVING THE PREVIOUS SOFT COST LANES THAT WE'VE HAD ON PROPERTY SO THAT THEY CAN GO AND DEMOLISH. THE PROPER STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY THAT THAT'S THAT THEY WANT TO DEMOLISH SO THAT IT CAN BE EASIER TO DEVELOP IN THE FUTURE. AND THIS IN THIS VOTE IS BASICALLY THE COMMISSION GIVING THE APPROVAL OF THAT FINANCIAL THIS IS JUST A BUDGET AMENDMENT MOVING THE FUNDS FROM THE BUILDING FUND INTO AN EXPENSE ACCOUNT. AND I KNOW THAT THE FINANCE DIRECTOR WILL PUT ME IN A HEADLOCK IF I DON'T POINT THIS OUT. IT IS NOT A LOAN THAT PEOPLE CAN APPLY FOR. IT IS A HELP IN HUMAN SAFETY DECISION BASED UPON THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY THAT THE BUILDING FUND IS BEING USED TO ADDRESS. OKAY I KNOW IT'S A SEMANTIC, BUT I JUST WANT TO APPRECIATE THAT ON THE PROPERTY, RIGHT? SO I GUESS THE TWO THINGS THAT I I'VE I SPOKE TO A COUPLE OF FOLKS. IN AND AROUND THE COMMUNITY ABOUT THE DOMINOES. UM IS THERE ANY WAY THAT WE COULD FACILITATE SOME SORT OF DOMINO TABLE AT THE REC CENTER? I THINK IT'S BECAUSE MABEL I JUST DID PLAYING. I THINK PEOPLE WILL DRINK THEIR BEER OR WHATEVER, AND THEY'LL SMOKE. AND THEN THEY'RE THE KIDS . SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING IS, I THINK I THINK WE HAVE A NO SMOKING ZONE. ON OUR ON OUR ON OUR FACILITIES, SO THERE'S NO SMOKE ZONE AND THE FACILITIES AND THEN PEOPLE WILL WANT TO HAVE A BEER. OR ANY OTHER ALCOHOL PRODUCTS. SO THAT I THINK IS THOSE ARE THE TWO THINGS MR. IS THAT CORRECT? MR CITY MANAGER? YES. YEAH, OKAY.IT JUST ALLOW BEER AT THE 10TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER OR SMOKING, OKAY? SO THEN THE SECOND. THE SECOND GUESS REQUEST IS THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE STAYING IN THOSE STRUCTURES.
THERE IS NO BUDDY HAS BEEN THE STRUCTURES ARE NOT RENTED TO ANYBODY. THERE ARE NO CURRENT TENANTS, ACCORDING TO THE FAMILY . NOW I DO BELIEVE THAT ONE OF THE PROBLEMS IS THAT PEOPLE ARE SQUATTING IN THE STRUCTURES. AND STAYING IN THEM, EVEN THOUGH THEY DON'T NEED CODE. THEY VIOLATED THE BUILDING COOK IN THE STATE. THEY DON'T HAVE ELECTRICITY. THAT'S RIGHT, ETCETERA, AND THEY'RE DANGEROUS AND PEOPLE COULD GET HURT. BUT BUT EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE NOT TENANTS. THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE STAYING THERE. WE KNOW THAT . SO UM I KNOW THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, UM, THAT THAT WORK WITH FOLKS IN NEED, WITH THE HOMELESS WITH PEOPLE IN HARD TIMES, SO YOU KNOW AH. I'LL COORDINATE WITH MAYBE 10 CITY HELPERS OR SOME OF THOSE GROUPS TO TRY TO REACH OUT TO THOSE FOLKS. UM I KNOW IT'S NOT NECESSARILY OUR RESPONSIBILITY BECAUSE IT'S PRIVATE LAND, BUT WE KNOW THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE THERE. SO IF THERE'S ANY I MEAN , IF THERE ARE ANY RELATIONSHIPS THAT WE HAVE ORGANIZATIONALLY WITH SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS JUST A LOOP THEM IN. SO FOLKS GET THE HEADS UP THAT THIS IS COMING DOWN THE LINE. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER, CAN WE. THE QUESTION. UM I THINK I GOT IT. I READ THIS. UM WHEN IT CAME UP FOR THIS AGREEMENT WITH THE MAGISTRATE, BUT I DON'T HAVE IT IN FRONT OF ME, SO I CAN'T REMEMBER. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT THAT AGREEMENT GIVE ANY KIND OF, UM STIPULATION OR REQUIREMENT THAT THE TALE OF PROPERTY COME BACK WITHIN A CERTAIN TIMEFRAME WITH SOME KIND OF A PLAN, AND I'M JUST CONCERNED HOW LONG THIS WILL GO. AND WILL WE END UP WITH HAVING CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES BEHIND A FENCE OR BEHIND ANYTHING WHERE WE HAVE TREES GROWING TALLER THINGS JUST BECOMING THE MOST. IF WE DON'T HAVE A TIME FRAME WHEN THEY'RE GOING TO BE COMING IN WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THIS THIS CONSENT ORDER IS CODE ENFORCEMENT. DRIVEN IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DEVELOPMENT HERE. YOU MY EAR, ONLY INTENDED TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE CURRENTLY BECAUSE RIGHT NOW AS MISS MCBRIDE POINTED OUT, SOMEBODY WENT ON SITE AND CUT DOWN THE TREES AND PILED THEM UP ON SITE, WHICH IS GARBAGE AND DEBRIS THAT VIOLATES I BELIEVE 10 61 OF THE CODE. IN ADDITION, THERE'S ALSO MOWING, TRIMMING ALL THE MAINTENANCE OF THE BUILDINGS VIOLATE THE CODE, HAVING PEOPLE AND STRUCTURES THAT ARE NOT QUALIFIED FOR HABITATION VIOLATES THE CODE.
THERE'S GARBAGE AND DEBRIS AROUND THE STRUCTURES. THE GROCERY STORE HAS NOT EVER BEEN CLEANED OUT AFTER THE FIRE, SO THAT ALSO VIOLATES THE CODE. AND THERE'S THE LIST GOES ON AND ON.
SO INSTEAD OF HAVING A LIEN RUNNING EVERY DAY AND SIMPLY LOOKING THE OTHER WAY TO WHAT WE KNOW IS A, UM HEALTH AND HUMAN SAFETY ISSUE. THE CITY'S STEPPING FORWARD AND TRYING TO
[00:40:03]
AT LEAST RESOLVED THE UNSAFE CONDITIONS THAT EXIST NOW AND ANSWER YOUR QUESTION. ABSOLUTELY THERE COULD EASILY BE A LACK OF MAINTENANCE, MOVING FORWARD THAT PLACE THIS IN A NEW SITUATION THAT A NEW PROBLEM ARISES. IN THE FUTURE. THANKS TO MAYOR CAN I JUST SPEAK MY HEART? I KNOW THAT I'M NOT SUPPOSED TO. AND UM SOME PEOPLE THINK I DON'T HAVE A HEART. BUT WHETHER IT'S ON MY SLEEVE OR NOT, BUT I'M JUST I JUST WANT TO SAY THIS THAT I KNOW THAT THE TAILOR TRUST HAS REORGANIZED HIMSELF, AND IT'S MOSTLY FAMILY MEMBERS AND OTHERS WHO ARE INVOLVED. WHAT. YOU KNOW , NOT JUST THIS FAMILY OR OR OTHER AND PROBABLY OTHER PROPERTIES. BUT WHEN YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN TAKE CARE OF, I WOULDN'T SAY IT'S A SIMPLE MANNER BECAUSE WE'RE HEARING NOW THAT IT'S $90,000 TO DO SOME OF THE THINGS BUT EVEN BEFORE THAT , WHETHER IT'S MORNING OR KEEPING THE PLACE CLEAN AND THEN PEOPLE LOSE THEIR PROPERTY. BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY LEANS AND SO MANY FINDS ON IT. IT IS JUST ABSOLUTELY HEARTBREAKING. AND I THINK THAT THIS IS A WAKE UP CALL THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS HERE AND OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE PROPERTIES THAT ARE CONSTANTLY IN CODE VIOLATION. AND THEN PEOPLE SAY, WELL, THE CITY IS DOING SOMETHING TO THEM.AND I JUST THINK THAT THIS WEEK . WHATEVER IT TAKES. I'M HOPING THAT WITH THAT'S WHY I WAS NOT THE MAGISTRATES MEETING WHAT I'M HOPING THAT IT WAS PUT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WITH HASTE WITH HASTE, SOMEBODY NEEDS TO COME IN WITH A PLAN AND TRY TO DO SOMETHING BEFORE IT PROLONGS TOO LONG. AND THEN THERE'S MORE AND MORE FINES ACCRUING, AND IT JUST MAKES IT VERY, VERY DIFFICULT FOR PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY WHEN THEY HAVE SO MUCH FUNDS TO OVERCOME. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER CLARK. YES TO SUM IT UP. THE CITY HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE TAYLOR FAMILY TRUST. TO BRING THIS PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE. IT MAY NOT BE EASY FOR SOMEONE AN EYESORE, BUT THE NEXT STEPS ARE TO SOMETHING CAN GET BUILT ON THE PROPERTY. THE CITY WILL EVALUATE APPLICATIONS AS THEY COME IN AND DISCUSSIONS WITH THE TAYLOR FAMILY TRUST US THAT HAPPENS, IT IS NOT THE CITY'S PROPERTY RIGHT NOW. OUR JOB, THOUGH, IS HEALTH AND PUBLIC SAFETY. WHAT IS THE PLEASURE OF THE BOARD? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND QUESTION.
SHE'S ALREADY SPOKE. SHE SPOKE AT PUBLIC COMMENT. AND FOR THIS AFTER THE ITEM YEAH. HOP ON CONSENT, BUT IT WASN'T ON ITEM TWO. SHE ACTUALLY WHEN SHE SPOKE , WAS ASKING WHEN WE'RE GOING TO HEAR THE TAILOR PROBLEM PROJECT, SO SHE WAS ACTUALLY ASKING ABOUT THIS ITEM, MISS JAMES YES.
PLEASE ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. CAN YOU HEAR US? YES I CAN HEAR YOU. UM YOU'VE ANSWERED ON MY CONCERNS. UM, LET'S JUST EXPRESSED ABOUT THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO THE TABLE PROPERTY. I LIVE NOT FAR FROM IT, AND I WAS AND STILL VERY CONCERNED ABOUT SAFETY. OF THE PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY. I HAD NO IDEA WHO COUNTRIES DOWN LIKE HAPPENED. I THOUGHT MAYBE THE TAYLORS DID THEMSELVES BUT IF THEY ARE UNAWARES OF IT AH, IT'S RIGHT ON OUR MAIN STREET, 10TH STREET IS AND IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT. AND HE WOULD I PERSONALLY LOVE THE SEA THAT THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO. UHH BRENDA! THEY THAT PROPERTY AND MAYBE BRILLIANT. NO INCOME HOUSING IS A POSSIBILITY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE AND ALL OF THE FAMILIES THAT HAVE BEEN PUSHED OUT AND MOVED OUT. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY MAYBE SOME ARE HOMELESS NOW , BUT I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT THE CITY HAS DECIDED TO WORK WITH HIM, AWAITING SOME OF THOSE LEANS AND COLD VIOLATIONS TO GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE THAT'S A LARGE PIECE OF PROPERTY. ITS HISTORICAL EVEN BEFORE TAKING THAT IT WAS ONE OF OUR FIRST LITTLE STORES AROUND HERE WHEN I WAS A LITTLE GIRL ON BY SOMEONE ELSE, BUT IT'S BEEN IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD FOR A REALLY LONG TIME. I DON'T KNOW OF COLDS HAPPEN TO BE CHANGED OR IF THE COLD THAT EXIST NOW WHERE THERE WAS A STORE AND A COMMUNITY COMBINED. THAT WOULD BE GREAT TO SEE SOMETHING LIKE THAT AGAIN, AND UM, I'M JUST VERY CONCERNED AS A PERSON LIVING VERY CLOSE TO THE TAYLOR'S PROPERTY. UM WHAT
[00:45:09]
HAPPENS IF THEY DON'T HAVE A TIME FRAME? TWO. CLEAN UP AND GET THINGS DONE. UM CHRISTIAN OCLOCK SAID HASTE ONLY BECAUSE OF SAFETY REASONS. AND, UM, VIOLATIONS. I KNOW YOU KNOW, YOU SAID PEOPLE ARE LIVING IN THOSE LITTLE COTTAGES BACK THERE. AND THAT IS UNSAFE. AND I KNOW PEOPLE DON'T HAVE ANYWHERE TO GO . SO THEY ARE JUST GOING WORK NATURALLY, WOULD COME TO SURVIVE , SO I DO THINK IT'S GREAT THAT THE THAT YOU ALL ARE WORKING WITH THE TAYLOR FAMILY, AND I JUST HOPE THAT SOMETHING BE DONE SOON TO CLEAR UP THAT DEBRIS THAT IS THERE NOW AND TO ALSO TAKE CARE OF THE TAILOR STORE THAT IS NO LONGER FUNCTIONING AND IS REALLY TO ME DANGEROUS.THEY'RE STILL THERE. THAT'S MY CONFLICT. THANK YOU, UM MISS KENDALL. WE PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. COMMISSIONER MEYER. YES MAYOR MATHESON. YES VICE MAYOR. MCDONALD COMMISSIONER CLARK.
YES, COMMISSIONER BRUNER? YES. OCEAN PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON ITEM NUMBER FIVE UNDER
[5.
OPPOSING LEGISLATION RELATING TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT FUNDING (RC):
RESOLUTION No. 10-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, OPPOSING SENATE BILL 1162 AND HOUSE BILL 621 RELATING TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT FUNDING; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
]COMMISSION ACTION OPPOSING LEGISLATION RELATING TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT FUNDING.
MR MARTEL, WE PLEASE READ THE RESOLUTION. THIS IS RESOLUTION NUMBER 16 2020 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA. ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN AGREEMENT. DW 4 34 30 AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT TO DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. MOVED TO A PROOF. SECOND. WELL, THAT WAS QUITE LIKE, YOU KNOW, I GIVEN NUMBER FOUR AND YOU READ IT PROPERLY CONSENT. I'VE READ THAT. I'M SORRY. RED NUMBER FOUR. THIS IS A RESOLUTION 10-2020 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, OPPOSING I CAN'T SAY SENATE BILL 1162 AND HOUSE BILL 6 21 RELATING TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT FUNDING, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT. THIS IS RESIDENT ADOPTED AND CONSENT.
THIS IS RESOLUTION NUMBER 10 2022 ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON THE AGENDA COMMISSION ACTION. IF WE HAVE A. MOTION TO APPROVE BY VICE MAYOR MCDONALD AND A SECOND COMMISSIONER CLARK. MR. HOGARTH WOULD YOU LIKE TO GIVE US A VERY BRIEF SUMMARY? SURE GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS BEN HOGARTH FOR THE RECORD JUST FOR THE PUBLIC CERTIFICATION. WHAT THIS IS OR CLARIFICATION, REALLY? SIMPLY THE LEGISLATURE, WE GOT A REPORT FROM THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES THAT SAID THIS WAS A BAD BILL. THEY EXPLAINED TO US WHAT IT WAS WHAT THE BILL DOES. IS IT WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS, FOR EXAMPLE, LIKE THE SOUTH OR WATER ARRANGEMENT DISTRICT. IF WE WANTED TO GET A GRANT FROM THEM IN THE FUTURE, WE WOULD HAVE TO CHANGE THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS AND WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS WE PROVIDE IN PART OF OUR BUDGET MANAGEMENT YEAR TO YEAR. WE PROFESS CERTAIN AMOUNT OF THE MONEY THAT WE COLLECT FROM REVENUES FROM STORM WATER FROM WATER SERVICES THAT WE PROVIDE MIGHT BE USED TO OFFSET. THAT'S NOT REALLY THE MOST ACCURATE TERM. WE MOVED MONEY AROUND JUST LIKE EVERY BUSINESS, EVERY GOVERNMENT BUSINESS THAT'S OUT THERE. THIS IS VERY COMMON PRACTICE THAT'S BEEN DONE FOR DECADES. UM WHAT THE LEGISLATURE IS SAYING IS WE CAN'T DO THIS ANYMORE IF WE EXPECT TO GET GRANT FUNDING FROM WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS LIVE. TIM IS SITTING UP HERE BECAUSE THERE IS ONE OTHER THING I FOUND IN THE BILL. THEY HAVEN'T BROUGHT UP YET. THAT'S A LITTLE BIT CONCERNING ABOUT THE TIMING OF THE URGENCY OF THE BILL. UM IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER AGENCIES BESIDES WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS THAT PROVIDE REVENUE FUNDING FROM THE JOURNAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT THAT THE LEGISLATURE PASSES EVERY YEAR.
TO DISPERSE THAT TO A CITY OR COUNTY GOVERNMENT. THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT IF WE RUN BUSINESS THE SAME WAY THAT I WAS JUST DISCUSSING AND SO MY CONCERN, MR MYRON MY CONCERN IS THAT WE HAVE FUNDING AND I DON'T KNOW IF WE'VE RECEIVED IT ALL DISPERSED, UM, FROM FROM THE STATE FROM STATE AGENCIES. DDP WOULD BE A GOOD EXAMPLE FROM SOME OF OUR ONGOING PROJECTS LIKE THE LIKE. THE LARGE WATER UTILITY PLANT PROJECT THAT WERE DOING REVERSE OSMOSIS AND EVERYTHING ELSE. THAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS. SO I DON'T KNOW IF WE'VE RECEIVED ALL THAT MONEY, BUT THAT WOULD ALSO INCLUDE UM, ANY MONEY THAT THE LEGISLATURE AS APPROPRIATE FOR US ALL THAT MONEY WE TALKED ABOUT. SO THAT'S A CONCERN WITH THIS BILL IN PARTICULAR THAT I DIDN'T EVEN THINK ABOUT EARLY ON, AND I STARTED TO LOOK AT A LITTLE BIT MORE AND REALIZED THERE'S OTHER MORE IMMEDIATE IMPACTS TO US NOT JUST UP TO A MILLION DOLLAR IMPACT EVERY YEAR FROM NOW ON. EXCELLENT THANK YOU, MR HOGARTH . WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND
[00:50:05]
ON THE TABLE FOR APPROVAL. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION? NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, PUBLIC COMMENTS. COMMISSIONER CLARK. YES NUMBER OWNER. YES MAYOR MATHESON. YES NICE MAYOR MCDONALD'S COMMISSIONER MEYER. YES AND THANK YOU TO OUR LEGISLATIVE WATCHDOG. MR HOGARTH. YES, THANK YOU. AH ITEM NUMBER SIX. I LIKE LIVING SHORELINE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.[6.
LIVING SHORELINE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT (RC):
RESOLUTION No. 13-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE UTILITIES & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT AN INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNCIL GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE SE ILLINOIS AVENUE LIVING SHORELINE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
]THIS IS RESOLUTION NUMBER 13 2022. AND MR MARTEL, WOULD YOU PLEASE READ? ITEM NUMBER SIX, A REVOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO SUBMIT AN INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNCIL GRANT APPLICATION. TO THE SOUTHEAST ILLINOIS AVENUE LIVING SHORELINES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT , PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, MR VOLCKER, WOULD YOU LIKE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY FOR THE RECORD. TIM VOLKER UTILITY IS AN ENGINEERING DIRECTOR, UM TO GIVE EVERYONE A LITTLE BACKGROUND MILTON I WERE APPROACHED THIS PAST SUMMER FROM THE NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY AND OFFICE. TO PARTNER ON A LIVING SHORELINES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AT THE NORTH END OF SOUTHEAST ILLINOIS AVENUE. AND HERE ON THE SCREEN, YOU'LL SEE KIND OF A PICTURE OF THE EXISTING SHORE LINE. MAIN REASON FOR CHOOSING THIS LOCATION IS BECAUSE IT'S AN UNIMPROVED SHORE LINE WITH A STORM WATER OUTFALL. AND HERE'S JUST KIND OF A PROPOSED SITE PLAN. UM WE'RE PROPOSING SEVERAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE SHORE LINE . THERE'S AN EXISTING BAFFLE BOX. THAT'S AN OLDER GENERATION ON GENERATION WANT. IT'S CALLED SO AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, WE LOOK TO KIND OF, UM I GUESS MODERNIZED THE INTERNAL COMPONENTS. YOU KNOW, PUT IN ON A NEW BAFFLE AND MAYBE SOME NEW TECHNOLOGY TO HELP, YOU KNOW, FILTER OUT. THE STORMWATER POLLUTANTS. SECONDARY WE WOULD INSTALL A FIVE FT BUFFERED SHORELINE ALONG THE UPLAND PORTION. THIS WOULD HELP PROVIDE FILTRATION FROM ANY STORMWATER RUNOFF COMING FROM SOUTHEAST ILLINOIS AVENUE. THIRDLY WE WOULD REMOVE THE EXISTING RUBBLE , CONCRETE THAT'S OUT THERE AND REPLACE IT WITH RIP RAP. THE RIPRAP WOULD HELP ARMOR THE SHORE LINE AND PROTECTED FROM EROSION. AND THEN LASTLY, OUT IN THE WATER, WE CONSTRUCT A 10 FT LIVING SHORELINE THAT 10 FT.
LIVING SHORE LINE WOULD BE CONSIST OF TWO THINGS. GABY IN STRUCTURE. IT'S CALLED GABY IN BASKETS. BASICALLY IT'S RIP RAP IN A WIRE MESH SO VERY NATURAL LOOKING THE PURPOSE OF THE GAY BIAN'S WOULD BE TO HELP DISSIPATE THE ENERGY OF ANY WAVES AND HELP PROTECT THE PLANTINGS, SO THE PLANTINGS WOULD BE THE SECOND PORTION OF THE LIVING SHORELINES. AND I MEAN BEACONS PLANTED, UH, INSIDE THE GEDEON BASKETS. BASICALLY THAT THE PLANTS WOULD HELP WITH NUTRIENT REMOVAL AND ALSO PROVIDE HABITAT FOR MARINE SPECIES AND WAITING BIRDS. AND HERE'S JUST A SECTION SHOWING. UH WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING UP UPLAND. HERE'S THE FIVE FT WIDE BUFFERED SHORT LINE. HERE'S THE RIP RAP ON THE SHORE LINE TO HELP ARMOR AND PROTECT FROM EROSION. AND HERE'S THE GABY IN BASKETS. AND THEN THE PLANTINGS IN BETWEEN THE GABY IN BASKETS.
AND ONE THING I WANT TO NOTE IS RIGHT NOW WE'RE PROPOSING A 10 FT WIDE SHORE LINE, AND THAT'S BECAUSE IT'S PERMIT. EXEMPT UM, SO IF THIS IS A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT IN THE FUTURE, THIS IS SOMETHING WE COULD LOOK TO EXTEND FURTHER WATER WORD OUT INTO THE WATER IF IT IS SUCCESSFUL. THEN WE CAN PULL THE NECESSARY PERMITS TO DO THAT. AND THEN BASICALLY, THIS GRANT IS FOR REQUESTING $85,000 FROM THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNCIL AND THEN THE CITY WOULD PROVIDE THE MATCH OF $85,000 IF SUCCESSFUL IN GETTING IT. WE WOULD AH, BUDGET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION NEXT FISCAL YEAR. THINK THIS IS A AWESOME PROJECT , AND I THINK IT COMPLEMENTS THEIR DIFFERENT STORMWATER PROJECT WE DID ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE HOSPITAL ABOUT EIGHT YEARS AGO WHERE WE MET MARENGO. BUT THEY'RE AMERICA WILL GO. YEAH WE DID THAT PROJECT IN LIKE 2014 15. AND I THINK COMPLIMENTS AS FAR AS IT FOR SOLVING A DRAINAGE GOING IN STORMWATER GOING DIRECTLY INTO THE RIVER. SO I THINK THIS IS FABULOUS AND I'LL MOVE FOR APPROVAL BECAUSE
[00:55:02]
THE SECOND ONE OF THE BEST THINGS THAT THIS IS KIND OF STUFF. I LOVE THAT WE DO. SECOND THANKS. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND MR VOCAL WHEN THE BUFFERED SHORELINE, THE TWO PICNIC BENCHES THAT ARE THERE WILL STILL REMAIN WITH THE BUFFALO SHORELINE CRYPT. YES THE FENCING WOODEN STATUES TO THE BENCHES. YES YES, WE'LL INCORPORATE. IF WE NEED TO RELOCATE THEM, WE'LL WE'LL DO THAT, BUT OBVIOUSLY WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THE BENCHING. THERE TOO.YOU KNOW, FOR THE VIEW AND ALL THAT. EXCELLENT. WE HAVE A. PUBLIC COMMENTS, MOTION AND A SECOND HE WOULD HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION. PLEASE COME TO THE MICROPHONE. THIS KEYHOLE COMPANY. DON'T. YES, THAT'S WHERE THE MANATEES ARE. WELL IT'S THE GRANTS THROUGH THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNCIL. THE PROJECTS ON THE ST LUCIE RIVER OUT HERE. BUT IS IT WORTH PLANTING SEAGRASS OR SAWGRASS HERE FOR THE MANAGES? I DON'T THINK THE MANATEES COME THEY'RE NOT GONNA TOO SHALLOW. AND UM I MEAN, THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN LOOK INTO. BUT I DON'T THINK THE ENVIRONMENTS CONDUCIVE FOR THEM TO COME UP TO THERE. WE DO HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTALIST ON BOARD THAT WOULD HELP WITH THAT. SO YEP. YEAH. OKAY, WE HAVE MOTION. FOR APPROVAL IN A SECOND. THE SKIN. ALWAYS CALL THE ROLL. COMMISSIONER MEYER. YES MR BRUNER? YES, COMMISSIONER CLARK.
YES MAKES MAYOR MACDONALD MAYOR MATHESON. YES AND I USUALLY REVIEW THESE GRANT APPLICATIONS ON THE RL NDP, BUT BUT I WON'T BE. UNFORTUNATELY, I WON'T BE ABLE TO REVIEW THIS ONE. OH SO ANYWAY, YOU HAVE MY SUPPORT AT LEAST YEAR. YEAH YOU CAN. THERE YOU GO. WONDERFUL I'VE READ IT A COUPLE TIMES AND GREAT APPLICATION. UM THANKS. YEAH I WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:54
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.