[00:00:06] OKAY WE'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER JORDAN'S YOU WANT TO DO ROLL CALL. CHAIR LAUREN HERE BY SHEER BROWNFIELD REMEMBER RICH. REMEMBER STRONG. BOARD MEMBER MASSING. BOARD MEMBER MATHERS. BURMA, RIGHT, ALI? ALRIGHT GREAT. LET'S PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. WOULD ANYONE I [APPROVAL OF AGENDA] WOULD ACTUALLY AND I PROBABLY BEFORE YOU APPROVE THE AGENDA. I NEED TO DO THIS. WE NEED TO SWITCH ITEM NUMBER TWO AND THREE. DO I TELL YOU THAT NOW? WE NEED TO DO ITEM NUMBER THREE FIRST AND THEN ITEM NUMBER. TWO. SO YOU CAN MAKE THAT A CONDITION ON APPROVING THE AGENDA. DOES SOMEBODY ELSE HAVE TO MAKE THAT MOTION OR OKAY? WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION? SECOND DISCUSSION. ALL IN FAVOR BY ANY OPPOSED. GREAT WE HAVE ARE MINUTES FROM OUR LAST MEETING. [APPROVAL OF MINUTES] ANYBODY HAVE ANY DISCUSSION OR ANY QUESTIONS? MOVE APPROVAL IN THE MINUTES. SECOND IN FAVOR [COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (3 Minutes Max.)] OPPOSED. OKAY, GREAT. OKAY DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON NON AGENDA ITEMS? NO, [COMMENTS BY BOARD MEMBERS (Non-Agenda Items)] OKAY. ANY COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD ON NON AGENDA ITEMS. OKAY FANTASTIC. WE'LL MOVE TO THE [Ordinance 2486-2022: Request to consider a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment from Commercial to Multi-Family Residential on 4.88 acres of land. The subject property is located at 751 SE Central Parkway. (Quasi-Judicial)(RC)] FIRST AGENDA. I WELL, THE WE'RE SWITCHING THEM. SO THE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2486-20 TO 2, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ERIN WILLETT CUT FOR THE RECORD SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THIS IS A SMALL SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS FOR ORDINANCE, UH, IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THEREBY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. FOR A 4.88 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 7 51. SOUTH EAST CENTRAL PARKWAY, SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK PROVIDING FOR APPEAL. OF ALL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY THAT YOU WILL BE DISCUSSING TONIGHT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CENTRAL PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 800 FT, SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION AT SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY AND SOUTHEAST FEDERAL HIGHWAY. THE HIGHLIGHTED PART PARCEL IN RED IS 4.88 ACRES OF LAND, AND THE PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 751 SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY. SO A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY ON THIS PROJECT SITE. IT WAS ORIGINALLY PLANNED AS A TOWER AS A PART OF THE TOWN PARK CONDOMINIUMS TO THE NORTH. UM WHEN THE FIRST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS APPROVED IN 1989 THIS THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATED FOR THIS PARCEL WAS MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. UM AND IT HAD OUR THREE ZONING, WHICH IS MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING. IN 1993 ORDINANCE, 12 93 93 WAS A FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO INSTITUTIONAL FOR THE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES CHURCH. THE ZONING REMAINED ARE THREE ON THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME. IN 2000 AND SEVEN ORDINANCE, 21. OH, SIX. OH SEVEN WAS A FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT ADOPTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO COMMERCIAL AND ALSO INCLUDED A REZONING FROM OUR THREE TO A COMMERCIAL P U D FOR PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE CENTER. THE PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL OFFICE CENTER WAS NEVER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTED IN 2000 AND SEVEN ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES CHURCH WAS DEMOLISHED AND THE SITE HAS REMAINED VACANT SINCE THEN THE COMMERCIAL P U D AND THE COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE HAVE HAS REMAINED ON THIS SITE FOR THE LAST 15 YEARS. SO IN DISCUSSING THE FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT, WHICH IS WHAT I'LL BE DISCUSSING FIRST. UM I WANTED TO DISCUSS THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT OF THE SCREEN. THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE FOR THE SITE IS COMMERCIAL. ACCORDING TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY, A 7.1 C COMMERCIAL AND USE CERULEAN JUICES AND ACTIVITIES PREDOMINANTLY CONNECTED WITH THE SALE, RENTAL AND DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTS OR PERFORMANCE OF PROFESSIONAL AND NON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. UM SO THIS SITE IS COMMERCIAL, THE SITE TO THE NORTH, WHICH IS TOWN [00:05:07] PARK CONDOMINIUMS IS INSTITUTIONAL. HOWEVER, THE USE ON THE SITE IS MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. UM FURTHER DOWN ON CENTRAL PARK WAY YOU CAN SEE IN THE YELLOW IS MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. AND THEN THERE IS A MIX OF INSTITUTIONAL COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE RESIDENTIAL IN THE SITE OR ON THE CENTRAL PARKWAY. THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT IS TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. AH! THE PROPOSAL WOULD ALLOW MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE SITE, WHICH ALLOWS 1 TO 3 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS PER BUILDING AND INCLUDES SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DUPLEX TOWN, HOME'S PATIO HOMES , GARDEN HOMES, APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUMS, FOSTER HOMES, GROUP HOMES. AN ADULT CONGREGATE, LIVING FACILITIES. LIMITED AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. STAFF HAS REVIEWED DATA, UM AND ANALYZED IT, UH, THE CRITERIA FOR FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENTS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING ANALYSIS PER THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTES. AN ANALYSIS OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES AND ANALYSIS OF THE SUITABILITY OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ITS PROPOSED USE, CONSIDERING THE CHARACTER OF THE UNDEVELOPED LAND, SOILS, TOPOGRAPHY, NATURAL RESOURCES AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ON THE SITE. AND AN ANALYSIS OF THE MINIMUM LAND NEEDED TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION. I WILL BE GOING OVER STAFFS ANALYSIS AND THE APPLICANTS DATA IN A MOMENT. THE DATA THAT WE REVIEWED WAS TOPOGRAPHY. WETLANDS STRATEGIC HABITAT CONSERVATION AREA. WELL FIELD PROTECTION SOILS, THE FEMA FLOODPLAIN, PUBLIC SERVICES AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT MAXIMUM BUILD OUT URBAN SPRAWL, HISTORIC RESOURCES AND A FUTURE LAND USE ALLOCATION. THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS BETWEEN IS AROUND A 2% SLOPE. UM AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS ELEVATED MAINLY AGAINST, UH, CENTRAL PARKWAY. THE SUBJECT SITE, UM, WAS REVIEWED WITH THE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY. NO WETLANDS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE. THERE IS NO STRATEGIC HABITAT CONSERVATION AREA IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE. UM A PORTION OF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WELL FIELD PROTECTION ZONE ZONE TO THE CITY OF STEWART FOLLOWS THE MARTIN COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES WELL, WELL FIELD PROTECTION ORDINANCE. AND ZONE TO WITHIN THAT ORDINANCE PROHIBITS ANY NONRESIDENTIAL ACTIVITIES THAT STORE HANDLE, PRODUCE OR USE ANY REGULATED STUFF. SUBSTANCE AS THIS IS, UM , A FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. UM THEY ARE COMPLIANT WITH THIS ORDINANCE. UM THE SOIL LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY IS WAVELAND AND IMMOKALEE FIND SANDS, WHICH IS POORLY DRAINED. IT'S COMMONLY FOUND THROUGHOUT THE CITY. UM A LARGE AMOUNT OF THE CITY HAS THE SOIL TYPE AND MORE GENERALLY, IT'S FOUND GEOGRAPHICALLY WITHIN FLAT WOODS ON MARINE TERRACES AND ON COASTAL PLAINS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X, WHICH IS AN AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD. THIS IS PART OF FEMA'S NATIONAL FLOOD HAZARD LAYER. IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY ON THE CITY'S TRAFFIC CONSULTANT COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE APPLICANTS, LONG RANGE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND CONCERN CONFIRMED THAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY IS CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT WOULD RESULT IN A MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL DECREASE OF 11,151 DAILY TRIPS. THAT'S 269 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS AND 1027 PM PICK OUT TRIPS PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S ROADWAY AND FUNCTIONAL CLASS AND EVACUATION MAP, WHICH IS LOCATED WITHIN ELEMENT. TWO OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY. IS A LOCAL RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY. UM POLICY A POLICY ONE A 3.2 REQUIRES, THAT LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN THE FUTURE LAND USE MAPS SHALL DIRECT DEVELOPMENT TO AREAS WHERE ADEQUATE UTILITIES SERVICES AND SCHOOLS EXIST OR ARE PLANNED. IN ORDER TO PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES. WE'VE REACHED OUT TO MARTIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. CITY OF STEWART, FIRE DEPARTMENT . MARTIN COUNTY SOLID WASTE CITY OF STEWART, POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CITY OF STEWART UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING, ALL OF WHICH HAVE STATED THAT THEY ARE ABLE TO REFERENCE UH THEY'RE ABLE TO SERVICE THE CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE FROM COMMERCIAL TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. STAFF HAS, UM, ANALYZE THE MAXIMUM BUILD OUT FOR BOTH THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. FOR 100% NON RESIDENTIAL WITH THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND GEOS. THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ON THE SITE WOULD BE 318,859 1000.2 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL UM, FOR THE MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL ON [00:10:08] THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE, WHICH IS 85% NONRESIDENTIAL AND 15% RESIDENTIAL. A TOTAL OF 271,030 . 0.32 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND SEVEN DWELLING UNITS WOULD BE PERMITTED ON THE SITE. THAT'S WHERE THIS EXISTING COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND JEWS, THE MAXIMUM BUILD OUT FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI FAMILY FUTURE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE IS 146.4 DWELLING UNITS IF IT'S 100% RESIDENTIAL, UM OR 102.48 DWELLING UNITS AND 31,885 0.92 SQUARE FEET. OF COMMERCIAL FOR 70% RESIDENTIAL AND 30% NONRESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM 30% NON RESIDENTIAL IS THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF NONRESIDENTIAL PERMITTED PER THE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE. STAFF HAS DONE IN URBAN'S BRAWL ANALYSIS. WHICH IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE AGENDA, PACKET AND YOUR STAFF REPORT. AH THERE ISN'T THERE ARE NO HISTORIC RESOURCES ON THE PROPERTY AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT THE NATIONAL THE NATIONAL HISTORY REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, UH, SHOWS THAT THE LYRIC THEATER, THE MARTIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE AND KRUGER HOUSE, OUR HISTORIC PLACES. UM BUT THERE ARE NO HISTORIC, UH, PLACES. ON THIS SITE. WITH THIS CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE THE ALLOCATION WOULD CHANGE. UM SO THE WITH THIS PROPOSAL GOING INTO EFFECT , THERE WILL BE A TOTAL OF 909. ACRES OF COMMERCIAL AND 587.2 ACRES OF MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS SUBJECT SITE IS 4.88 ACRES. BEEN A STAFF POSITION THAT THIS CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WOULD BE A BETTER BALANCE BETWEEN MULTI FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN THE CITY OF STEWART WITH THIS CHANGE FINALLY, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 2486 2022 A STAFF POSITION THAT THE PROPOSAL AND USES COMPATIBLE WITH AND COMPLEMENTARY TO ADJACENT USES ALONG THE CENTRAL PARKWAY CORRIDOR. BASED ON STAFF ANALYSIS AND SUBJECT TO THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT STAFF CONFIRMS THAT THE PROPOSAL IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. THANK YOU. WONDERFUL THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JUST THE APPLICANT HAVE PRESENTATION THEY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE. GOOD EVENING FOR THE RECORD BY BRAINS ARE BEHIND US ATTORNEY WITH AGAINST HER LAW FIRM. AND I'M HERE THIS EVENING ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. AND AS WE STATED, WE'RE HERE TONIGHT FOR A SMALL SCALE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO USE AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGING LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL ABOUT TWO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. A LOT OF THIS STUFF THAT I WAS GOING TO COVER. AARON DID AN EXCELLENT JOB. VERY THOROUGH ANALYSIS. I DID A VERY THOROUGH ANALYSIS ON THIS AND A LOT OF THE STUFF THAT I HAVE. OUR PRESENTATION IS SOMEWHAT DUPLICATED. BUT I'LL COVER SOME OF THE THINGS BUT I'LL TRY NOT TO BE TO REPENT. SO THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON CENTRAL PARKWAY. UM RIGHT THERE, APPROXIMATELY TWO MILES SOUTH OF DOWNTOWN STUART. WEST OF. US ONE, AND I THINK AS YOU GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION, YOU'LL SEE THAT THIS IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INFILL DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS PIECE OF PROFIT. HERE'S A LITTLE ZOOMING IN ON THE PROPERTY, AS WAS MENTIONED WERE APPROXIMATELY THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT IS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 4.88 ACRES. AND THE PROPERTY SURROUNDING IT. IT'S HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE IS THE EXISTING TOWN PARK CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AND THIS PROJECT SUBJECT SITE WAS ACTUALLY PART OF IS AARON HAD MENTIONED THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWN PARK. AS YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTY AGAIN. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED AND, UH, UNDER THIS ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE FUTURE PHASES FOR TOWN PARK WERE TO OCCUR ON THIS PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN FACED 78 AND NINE THOSE PHASES WERE NEVER BUILT. AND AGAIN THAT WAS IN 1982. ERIN KIND OF COVERED. YOU KNOW THE HISTORY OF THIS AND I THINK IT I WANT TO JUST FOCUS IN ON THIS JUST FOR A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE I THINK TO REALLY APPRECIATE WHY THIS IS, UH, THE [00:15:02] APPROPRIATE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF MULTI FAMILY. IS AGAIN TO REALLY UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY OF WHAT'S OCCURRED ON THIS PROPERTY. UH SINCE REALLY 1982, AS WAS MENTIONED. THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS APPROVED PRIOR TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY BEING ADOPTED IN 1989 AND IN 1989 THE ORIGINAL FLU FOR THE PROPERTY WAS MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. I WOULD ASSUME, OF COURSE THAT WAS RECOGNIZING THE EXISTING MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT THE TOWN PARK APPROVAL. IT WAS ALREADY EXISTING ON THE PROJECT, AS WAS MENTIONED. IN THE MID NINETIES. I THINK AROUND 1993 OF THE LAND USE CHANGE OCCURRED THERE WAS AN AMENDMENT TO GO FROM THE FAMILY , MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO INSTITUTIONAL AND THAT I THINK WAS IN RECOGNITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY FOR A CHURCH. AND AT THAT TIME, UH, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING AND, UM MS CORNETTE IS HERE. UH IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE TOWN PARK COMMUNITY OBJECTED TO THE CHANGE TO INSTITUTIONAL AT THAT TIME, BUT SHE CAN CERTAINLY CAN CONFIRM THAT AND SPEAK. THAT AND MORE DETAILS SHE LIKES SOMEONE SPEAK FOR CAL PARK. BUT SO THE FLU THEN, UH, THE CHURCH WAS EVENTUALLY DEMOLISHED AND THE FLU WAS CHANGED AS AARON MENTIONED IN 2000 AND SEVEN FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO COMMERCIAL. AH AND THAT THE CHURCH WAS DEMOLISHED AROUND 2000 AND EIGHT AND, OF COURSE, IRONICALLY, RIGHT AROUND THAT SAME TIME AS WHEN WE STARTED AS WE ALL RECALL HITTING. BEEN UH, DEPRESSION AND RECESSION AND YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BASICALLY HAS STALLED ON THE PROPERTY FOR 10 PLUS YEARS. AND SO WE'RE REQUESTING TO RETURN THE PROPERTY TO THE ORIGINAL 1989 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. TO PROVIDE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING AS INITIALLY CONTEMPLATED AT THIS LOCATION, AND WE BELIEVE IS ALWAYS BEEN THE APPROPRIATE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY BY THE FACT THAT THIS PROPERTY. HAS HAD THIS COMMERCIAL AND USE DESIGNATION ON IT FOR SOME TIME AND NEVER BEEN DEVELOPED. I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS BECAUSE AGAIN, ERIN KIND OF TOUCHED ON UH, THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL IN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. I THINK THE IMPORTANT THING IS THIS LAST BULLET POINT, WHICH IS THE AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, AS AARON MENTIONED WILL RESULT IN A DECREASE OF 11,151 DAILY TRIPS BASED ON THE MAXIMUM BUILD OUT. OF COMMERCIAL COMPARED TO THE MAXIMUM BUILD OUT OF THE RESIDENTIAL, UH, ON THE PROPERTY, SO WE BELIEVE THIS WILL HAVE A LOT LESS IMPACT ON THE ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD, EXISTING NEIGHBORS AND THE WHOLE COMMUNITY THROUGHOUT SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY. UH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THERE'S A LOT OF OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT STAFF WENT THROUGH AND AARON MENTIONED SOME OF THEM AND I'M CERTAINLY NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH AND THEY DID A GOOD JOB OF DOING AN ANALYSIS. VERY THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF THAT. BUT I DID WANT TO TOUCH ON SOME OF THE IMPORTANT ONES HERE IF WE COULD , WHICH WAS THE FIRST IS OBJECTIVE ONE A FIVE. UH ARE AND THAT'S RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL PROVIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR FAMILIES WHO WANT TO LIVE IN THE CITY, INCLUDING FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO WORK WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. THE CONVERSION TO MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FURTHERS THE POLICIES OF 1.85 POINT FIVE BY PROVIDING A COMMUNITY OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR FAMILIES. SO THIS AMENDMENT ALIGNS WITH THAT OBJECTIVE BECAUSE IT ENSURES LAND USE COMPATIBILITY. AND WILL PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY AND PEDESTRIAN, UH FRIENDLY TYPE COMMUNITIES THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR UNDER THOSE POLICIES. HERE. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WILL ALSO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT TO ALIGN WITH THE INTENT OF POLICY ONE A 51 BY PROMOTING A MORE COMPACT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND BY ENCOURAGING COMPACT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROPOSAL ALIGNS WITH GLOBAL TO POINT A, WHICH DISCOURAGES URBAN SPRAWL. THIS IS AGAIN A CLASSIC EXAMPLE . I THINK OF AN INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND AN OPPORTUNITY AND THIS IS THE RIGHT PROJECT. OR THE RIGHT LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY FOR INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND FOR COMPACT DEVELOPMENT. AND THE SUBJECT SITE. AS I SAID, AGAIN AS AN INFIELD PROPERTY SURROUNDED BY EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, AND IT'S BEEN PREVIOUSLY CLEARED FOR DEVELOPMENT, AND THE SITE WAS INTENDED TO BE AN EXTENSION OF TOWN PARK ORIGINALLY AND IN ESSENCE, WE'RE JUST PROPOSING TO CONTINUE THAT ORIGINAL. PLAN AND GOAL AND AGAIN IT WILL DESCRIBE DISCOURAGED URBAN SPRAWL BY, UH , FACILITATING URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT. AS WE SHOULD BE DOING HERE IN THE CITY OF STEWART. AND THIS IS ONE. THIS [00:20:03] IS A TYPO. BY THE WAY, IT SHOULD BE POLICY. ONE B. 0.3 POINT TWO I APOLOGIZE FOR THE TYPO. ALL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH AND COMPLEMENTARY TO THE SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SHALL NOT UNDULY AFFECT EXISTING APPROVED PROJECTS. AND ACTIVITIES AND I BELIEVE THIS TO ME IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE WHEN IT COMES TO LAND USE, BECAUSE IT'S REALLY ABOUT COMPATIBILITY AND WHAT'S IN THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AND HOW IT'S ALL GOING TO WORK. THROUGHOUT UH, YOU KNOW THE EXISTING AREA AND SO I THINK THE MULTI FAMILY IS THE APPROPRIATE ONE HERE. I THINK MANY OF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH SOUTH EAST CENTRAL PARKWAY. THERE ARE A LOT OF MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD. THERE'S ALSO A NICE MIX OF OFFICE. THERE'S AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, SO WE BELIEVE THAT THIS WILL BE AN ABSOLUTE APPROPRIATE LAND USE DESIGNATION. TO RETURN IT TO THE MULTI FAMILY. RESIDENTIAL FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. TO THE POINT OF BEING COMPATIBLE AND NOT CREATING ADVERSE IMPACTS. THIS IS A LETTER OF SUPPORT THAT WE RECEIVED FROM WELDING KEV FREEMAN RECEIVED FROM A TOWN PARK AND AGAIN MISS CORNETS HERE AND SHE CAN SPEAK TO IT, BUT I WOULD JUST DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO THE HIGHLIGHTED AREA IN THE LETTER. THIS CAME FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. TOWN PARK TO MR FREEMAN THAT THE APPLICANTS PROPOSAL WOULD HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON OUR COMMUNITY AND THE SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY NEIGHBORHOOD. AS A WHOLE, AND THAT JUST KIND OF EMPHASIZES THE POINT THAT I WAS MAKING WITH RESPECT TO THE PREVIOUS POLICY THAT I WAS ADDRESSING, AND THEY GO ON TO ACCEPT. THEY ASKED TO ACCEPT THIS LETTER OF SUPPORT. OF THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT ALONG WITH SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WE CAN TALK ABOUT. UM THE STAFFING AGAIN. I COMPLIMENT AARON AND THE REST OF THE STAFF. THEY DID IT. I THINK AN EXCELLENT JOB OF REVIEWING THIS VERY THOROUGH AND THEY FOUND THAT THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED. AND FOUND TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING ALL LEVEL OF SERVICES. AND THEY FIND THAT THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT COMPLIES WITH MANY OF THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SUPPORTS COMPACT URBAN DEVELOPMENT AS WE DISCUSSED SO YOUR STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE PROPERTY BACK TO THE ORIGINAL MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU PASSED THAT RECOMMENDATION, ALONG WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF LAND USE FROM THE COMMERCIAL TO THE MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SO THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION WILL CERTAINLY BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE, AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. BEFORE WE GO FURTHER. DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS THEY WANT TO DISCLOSE WITH I SPOKE TO MR RAINES BASICALLY SHARED THE EXACT SAME THING TO ME EARLIER. YEAH I HAVE A TOWN PARK IS ONE OF MY CLIENTS ON A COUPLE OF ISSUES, AND THIS WAS ONE THAT THEY ASKED ME TO REVIEW SO UH, BUT COMMUNICATION. ANYONE ELSE? I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM MR RAINES AS WELL. I SPOKE WITH MR JOHNSTON. FEW MONTHS BACK, OKAY? YEAH, OKAY. ARE YOU HERE FOR PUBLIC? ARE YOU HERE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, THOUGH? OKAY SO WE HAVE TO WAIT TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION WHICH WILL COME IN A FEW MINUTES. DO YOU HAVE TO BE FILLED OUT A FORM? OKAY, FANTASTIC. OKAY GREAT. SO NOW WE WILL MOVE FOR ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. JORDAN'S YOU HAVE COMMENTS, PUBLIC COMMENTS ANYBODY YOU HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT. CAN YOU PLEASE BRING IT TO THE CLERK? THANK YOU. BUT SIR HOLD ON ONE SECOND. LET ME READ THIS SO I CAN HAVE YOU RECOGNIZED HIM AND YOU'LL COME TO THE PODIUM. JUST WAIT ONE SEC. I PROMISE WE WILL MAKE SURE YOU GET UP THERE. THANK YOU, SIR. WRITING. OKAY FIRST UP IS MR CHARLES BURGER, PLEASE? THIS SIR, PLEASE PROCEED TO THE PODIUM. THANK YOU, AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES FOR COMMENT. DON'T TAKE ME THAT LONG. I'VE NEVER DONE THIS SPOKE FROM THE GROUP LIKE THIS. ANY FOLK PAS I MAKE. I APOLOGIZE FOR AN EVENT. I TALKED WITH RYAN HERE EARLIER BEFORE THE MEETING. HE SEEMS LIKE A VERY HONEST MAN. HE SETTLED THE PROBLEMS I HAD, WHICH WAS WITH CUTTING DOWN ALL THE TREES. I MEAN, THEY'VE GOT [00:25:02] PROBABLY TAKE A GUESS. SEXUALLY ACRES OF TREES. HERE ON ON CENTRAL PARK WINE. NOW WE'RE DOWN TO THAT LITTLE BIT AND I WAS VERY CONCERNED THAT WOULD BE CUT. BECAUSE MY BUILDING BAGS AFTER THAT, AND I CAN SEE THE BIRDS. ENTERS MORE BIRDS MOVING IN THERE. IN THE WOODS BEFORE, SO THAT'S TELLING ME THERE'S A PROBLEM, OK? THE SECOND PROBLEM WAS I MOVED THERE 20 YEARS AGO. AND YOU COULDN'T GET OUT ON US ONE AND THEN THERE WAS NO LIGHT THERE. I TALKED. TO SOMEBODY ON THE COUNTY COMMISSION. AT THAT TIME, THEY TOLD ME THERE WOULD BE NO TRAFFIC LIGHT THERE BECAUSE IT WAS ONLY THREE LENGTHS DISCREET. SO MY CONCERN IS THAT THIS POINT IN MY LIFE IS I DON'T WANT TO BE TRAPPED ON SOUTHEASTERN PARKWAY. BECAUSE I CAN'T GET OUT ON CAMERA AND I CAN'T GET OUT ON YOU ASK ONE. NOW THE ONLY ADOPT THE ONLY WAY YOU'RE GONNA FIX THAT PROBLEM IN MIKE. I'M NOT A TRAFFIC CONTROL ROOMS. IS GOING TO HAVE TO PUT ANOTHER LIGHT DOWN IN CANADA HIGHWAY AND THAT'S GOING TO MAKE ANOTHER MAN. CAME THROUGH UP HERE. TRAFFIC CIRCLES. FIRST TIME I WENT THROUGH THEIR CONFUSION. CORNER WAS 45 YEARS AGO. HASN'T CHANGED. MORE TRAFFIC. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH CENTRAL PARKWAY SO THAT AND THANK YOU, SIR. CONSIDERATION. I'M SURE YOU'RE GOING TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS. THINK AND THANK YOU ALL FOR THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENT, SIR. CAN WE HAVE MISS JANE CORNETTE, PLEASE? DO I HAVE? WHAT? NEXT PERSON YOU'RE DONE. YOU'RE GOOD. GOOD EVENING . MY NAME IS JANE CORNET AND I HAVE A HEAD COLD. THAT'S WHY I SOUND LIKE THIS. UM AND WE ARE VERY HAPPY TO REPORT UM AS THE ATTORNEY FOR TEM PARK NORTH FOR THE LAST 100 YEARS. UM DO THAT. WE'VE HAD VERY SUCCESSFUL DISCUSSIONS WITH THE DEVELOPER HERE. AND AS YOU SAW IN THE LETTER, IT RESULTED IN UNANIMOUS SUPPORT. WHEN WE HAD THE BOARD VOTE, IT WAS UNANIMOUS TO SEND THAT LETTER. THERE WAS A LOT OF ISSUES THAT WERE INVOLVED. AS MR RAINES POINTED OUT, IT WAS ACTUALLY PART OF OUR COMMUNITY. WE DID HAVE MR MATHERS GUIDING US ON ISSUES LIKE DRAINAGE. BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THAT'S SOMETHING. WE HAVE CONNECTIONS FOR THEIR TWO AND WASTEWATER, BUT WE WORKED THEM ALL OUT. UM WE HAD LOTS OF GOOD MEETINGS, AND SO MY CLIENTS REQUESTED ME TO COME HERE THIS EVENING. AND EXPRESSED THEIR SUPPORT. FOR BOTH THE LAND USE AMENDMENT. AND THE OTHER PART. THANK YOU, MA'AM. I APPRECIATE IT. THERE'S NO MORE. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ONLINE? OKAY, WONDERFUL, AND THERE'S NO MORE IN THE AUDIENCE ON THIS. FANTASTIC. DO WE HAVE ANY BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS? QUESTIONS. OKAY. WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I'D MOVE APPROVAL OF THE LAND YOU STRANGE. HAVE A 2ND 2ND. WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE? CHAIR. LAUREN YES. FOR MEMBER MASSING. BOARD MEMBER MATHERS. YES CHAIR BROWNFIELD REMEMBER, VITALI? YES. WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. OKAY [Ordinance 2487-2022: Request to consider a rezoning from Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), and site plan approval to allow 60 townhouse units on 4.88 acres of land for the Sailfish Cay RPUD. The subject property is located at 751 SE Central Parkway. (Quasi-Judicial)(RC)] NEXT ON THE ITEM IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 2487-202 2, PLEASE. YES. GOOD EVENING BOARD MEMBERS AGAIN . ERIN WILLETT, CASINO PLANNER WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR THE RECORD. ONE MOMENT. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR THE REZONING AT FROM A. FROM A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLAN. YOU DID PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SELFISH K TOWN HOMES. THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSIONER, THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE REAL PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. CPU D TWO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ARE PEUT. FOR A 4.88 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 751 SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY, SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED [00:30:03] IN EXHIBIT A ESTABLISHING THE SAILFISH CASE. R P U D CONSISTING OF 60 TOWNHOUSE UNITS APPROVING A MASTER SITE PLAN. PROVIDING DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT , DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERKPEAL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT. PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. AT THIS MOMENT, I'M GOING TO HAVE RYAN JOHNSTON COME UP AND EXTEND DESCRIBED THE PROJECT AND THEN STAFF IS GOING TO FINISH UP. OKAY? GOOD EVENING FOR THE RECORD. RYAN JOHNSTON JOHNSTON GROUP DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION. I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD TONIGHT TO PRESENT THE PROJECT. ERIN DID DO A GREAT JOB EARLIER, SO I'M GOING TO TRY AND NOT BE TOO DUPLICATIVE ON SOME OF THIS STUFF. WE TALKED ABOUT THE PROJECT LOCATION AT THE NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF US ONE AND, UH, SOUTHEAST CENTRAL. SOME OF THIS ALREADY BEEN COVERED. BUT FOR THE JUST FOR THE PURPOSES OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT'S HAPPENED WITH THE PROPERTY IN THE PAST, AND HOW IT'S BEEN DEVELOPED, WILL DISCOVER A COUPLE OF THESE THINGS AS WE MENTIONED BEFORE IT'S PART OF THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TOWN PARK. THIS WAS FUTURE PHASES, 78 AND NINE UH, SUBSEQUENT TO THAT IN 1993. IT WAS REZONED INSTITUTIONAL SO THAT THE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES COULD BUILD A CHURCH ON THE PROPERTY. SO THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED CIRCA 1993. MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT WRONG, SAYS 95 ALSO DEMOLISHED IN 2000 AND EIGHT. I THINK, ERIN, MAYBE MORE ACCURATELY, SAID 2000 AND SEVEN AND RIGHT ABOUT THE SAME TIME IN 2000 AND SEVEN IT WAS APPROVED TO TAKE THIS PROPERTY FOR, UM, A FUTURE LAND. USE OF INSTITUTIONAL TO COMMERCIALS SO THAT THIS PROJECT COULD BE CONSTRUCTED AND THIS WAS 42,000 SQUARE FEET. COMPRISE DIDN'T UH UM, A NUMBER OF SINGLE STORY MEDICAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS AND 100 AND 60 PARKING SPACES. OF COURSE, THAT HAPPENED AT THE TIME WHEN THE GREAT RECESSION WAS JUST STARTING AND SO REALLY NOT SIGNIFICANT SURPRISE ON A SPECULATIVE DEVELOPMENT THAT THIS DIDN'T GO FORWARD. THESE WERE THE APPROVED BUILDING ELEVATIONS. UM ONE THING THAT STRUCK US REALLY, INTERESTINGLY ON THIS WAS THE BACK OF THE BUILDINGS. ACTUALLY IF YOU LOOK AT THE ELEVATION IN THE BOTTOM LEFT, THAT'S THE REAR ELEVATION OF THE BUILDINGS, AND THAT'S WHAT WAS FACING TOWN PARK AND WE SAID, WELL, THAT'S PROBABLY NOT SOMETHING THAT THEY WOULD WANT THEIR WHICH WAS PART OF THE REASON WHY WE DECIDED TO DO THIS PROJECT IS MORE OF A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN, REALLY INTAKE THE PROJECT AND PUT THE INNER PARTS IN AND TURN THE PROJECT TO THE OUTSIDE. WE'LL GET INTO THAT. SO WHEN WE STARTED THE PROJECT WE SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT'S OUR MISSION HERE? WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH? AND SO WE CAME UP WITH A MISSION STATEMENT, AND I'LL READ IT AND IT IS TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY HOUSING IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO DOWNTOWN STUART AND A COMMUNITY BASED ON TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN CONCEPTS, UTILIZING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE SORRY TECHNIQUES THAT PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT. THE KEYWORDS IN THAT MISSION STATEMENT, OUR QUALITY PROXIMITY, TRADITIONAL AND ENVIRONMENT. SO THESE WERE THE THINGS THE DRIVING FORCES BEHIND US AND EVERYTHING THAT WE DID WITH THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT TO REALLY MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE KEEPING ALL OF THOSE THINGS IN MIND. TO COME UP WITH A REALLY HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT HERE THAT EVERYBODY CAN BE PROUD OF. SO FOR ANYBODY WHO DOESN'T KNOW WHAT TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN IS, I JUST ADDED SOME CONCEPTS HERE, SO IT'S COMPACT DEVELOPMENT WITH NARROWER STREETS ON STREET PARKING THE USE OF ALLEYS FOR GARAGE ACCESS, LIMITED, IMPERVIOUS AREA. REDUCED BUILDING SETBACKS AND NON GATED COMMUNITIES. SO WE TOOK ALL THESE THINGS AND WE SAID WE CAN ACCOMPLISH A GREAT DEVELOPMENT HERE. IF WE FOLLOW THESE THESE THESE TECHNIQUES AND REALLY DO SOMETHING THAT'S REALLY URBAN, AS BOB HAD SAID EARLIER IN AN INFILL DEVELOPED SO THEN WE GET INTO LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? WELL IMPACT DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS AND PRACTICES USER MIMIC NATURAL PROCESSES THAT RESULT IN INFILTRATION. BAPU TRANSPIRATION OR USE OF STORM WATER IN ORDER TO PROTECT QUALITY WATER QUALITY AND ASSOCIATED AQUATIC LIFE. AND SO HOW DO YOU DO THAT, WITH THROUGH THE INFLAMMATION OF RAIN GARDENS, PERMEABLE PAYMENT, PAVEMENT AND PERVIOUS CONCRETE, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS RAINWATER CATCHMENT AREAS, ENGINEERED FILTRATION, BIO SWELLS, RAIN HARVESTING AND GREEN ROOFS. AND THESE THINGS ALLOW YOU TO INCREASE WATER QUALITY AND MORE PARTICULARLY SO THIS IS A STANDARD THAT'S THAT'S NOT A STANDARD IN THE CITY'S CODE. IT'S NOT A STANDARD IN SOUTH FLORIDA'S CODE. THIS IS STUFF THAT'S OVER AND BEYOND WHAT EVERYBODY IS REQUIRED TO DO IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. BUT IT'S STUFF THAT REALLY IS, UH, YOU KNOW, I GUESS YOU'D CALL ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP. YOU KNOW, THIS IS REALLY THIS IS REALLY THE WAY THAT WE SHOULD BE GOING WITH WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN FLORIDA BECAUSE WE DO HAVE LIMITED NATURAL RESOURCES THAT YOU KNOW IT'S TIME TO START REALLY LOOKING AT THIS STUFF AND PROTECTING IT. SO THIS IS OUR PROPOSED SITE PLAN. [00:35:01] I'LL START WITH JUST BECAUSE OF THE ORDER OF HOW THIS HOW I PUT THIS TOGETHER, BUT I'LL START WITH THE FACT THAT I AND I TOUCHED ON THIS IS THAT WE? WE TOOK THIS. THIS, UH THIS IDEA OF TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN AND WE SAID, OKAY, THIS CAN REALLY WORK HERE REALLY? WELL BECAUSE NOT ONLY DOES THE PROJECT WOULD IT TURN THE PROJECT INSIDE OUT SO THAT THE FRONT DOORS ARE FACING TOWN PARK. IT ALSO ALLOWS US TO REALLY ENGAGE THE STREET AND PROVIDE ON STREET PARKING. REALLY MORE OF THAT TRADITIONAL TYPE. UM YOU KNOW, DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN A LONG TIME AGO WHERE WE GOT AWAY FROM THAT AND IN FLORIDA, AND WE STARTED DOING, YOU KNOW, QUITE FRANKLY, MORE SUBURBAN COMMUNITIES. GATED COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE THE YARDS IN THE BACKYARDS. FACING A WALL THAT FACES THE STREET. WE SAID WE DON'T WANT TO DO THAT ANYMORE. YOU KNOW WE WANT TO DO IS SOMETHING THAT'S REALLY ENGAGING TO THE COMMUNITY THAT WHEN YOU WALK DOWN CENTRAL PARKWAY ON THE SIDEWALK THAT WE'RE GOING TO BUILD THAT YOU'VE GOT, YOU KNOW, BEAUTIFUL, YOU KNOW? PORCHES OR PATIO AREAS WHERE PEOPLE ARE, YOU KNOW ARE ENGAGED, YOU KNOW, SAY HI TO YOUR NEIGHBOR, YOU KNOW, UM SO THAT WAS A KIND OF A DRIVING FORCE HERE. SO THE ONLY UNITS THAT REALLY DON'T REALLY GO WITH THAT OR THE UNITS THERE ALONG WITH THE LAKE, BUT I MEAN, THEY'RE LAKEFRONT UNITS THEIR INTERNAL TO THE SITE, BUT WE REALLY TURNED THIS THING INSIDE OUT. THE OTHER THING THAT IT HELPED US DO IS, UH, IS REALLY PROVIDE SOME PROTECTION TO TOWN PARK. UM, YOU KNOW, FOR THE TRAFFIC. UM THE GARAGE IS ON THE BACK SIDE, YOU KNOW, SO THOSE SIGHTS AND THE SOUNDS OF THE CARS VERSUS HAVING A RING ROAD THAT GOES AROUND THE PROPERTY. ON THE OUTSIDE, YOU KNOW, REALLY PROVIDES THEM WITH A BUFFER TO WHERE I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A MUCH MORE COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT. YOU KNOW, THEN IT THEN IT COULD HAVE BEEN IF IT WERE DESIGNED. OTHERWISE UM, YOU KNOW, AND THAT'S THE SAME AS LONG SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY. AND IN ADDITION TO THAT TRASH TRUCKS AND EVERYTHING ELSE, ALL EVERY OTHER SERVICE VEHICLE THAT COMES IN THERE IS BASICALLY YOU KNOW, ISOLATED INSIDE THE COMMUNITY SO THAT IT'S NOT A NUISANCE TO THE NEIGHBORS. SO, UM I DON'T HAVE. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE POINT. THIS IS NOT A POINT. IT DOES. CHINA. BUDDY'S EYES. SO SORRY. SO UM, I'LL JUST KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH THE CONCEPT HERE. SO BASICALLY, UM, YOU KNOW, STARTING ON THE OUTSIDE HERE, WE'RE PROPOSING TO BEAUTIFY THE MEDIAN HERE. UM YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO ADD IN SOME. THESE ARE ACTUALLY SHOWN AS PINK TABOO AREAS AND I KNOW OUR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PROBABLY CRUCIFY ME BUT SOME SMALL TYPE OF PALMS HERE, THE SO COMING INTO THE COMMUNITY. WE'VE GOT A VERY LARGE SPECIMEN OAK TREE HERE AGAIN, NON GATED, NON GATED COMMUNITY. THE ONLY FENCES THAT YOU'LL SEE HERE THERE'S SOME FENCES JUST TO PROTECT PEOPLE'S PATIOS BECAUSE THAT'S JUST A DEMARCATED PRIVATE SPACE. SO THOSE ARE ONLY FOUR FT. AND THEY'RE ACTUALLY A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN THE SIDEWALK, SO IT'S PROBABLY ONLY THREE. FT. UM AND WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO INSTALL A FENCE. PART OF OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH TOWN PARK WAS TO INCLUDE OFFENSE BURIED WITHIN OUR BUFFER HERE, NOT ON THE PERIMETER BECAUSE WE SAID, WE DON'T WANT THIS TO LOOK LIKE A GATED COMMUNITY BUT TO ADD OFFENSE HERE THAT WOULD PREVENT ONE OF THEIR CONCERNS WAS THAT THE PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY MIGHT PARK OVER HERE AND WALK OVER HERE, OR THAT PEOPLE FROM OUR COMMUNITY MIGHT PARK OR MIGHT WALK TO THEIR POOL AND JUMP IN THE POOL. THAT REMINDS ME OF WHEN I WAS YOUNG. WE USED TO GO PULL HOPPING. UM THE BASICALLY WIDE OPEN COMMUNITY. THIS IS ALL TO WAY CIRCULATION THROUGH THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY HERE AND WHAT YOU SEE IS BASICALLY THIS IS ALL THE GARAGE ACCESS ALONG THE BACK SIDE. SO ALL OF THIS RIGHT IN HERE IS IN THE BACK SIDE. AND WE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS WITH UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ABOUT TRASH COLLECTION. ONE OF THEIR CONCERNS WAS THAT YOU KNOW IF WE DO A RING ROAD LIKE THIS IN THE INSIDE, YOU KNOW THEY DON'T WANT TO HAVE TO BACK THE TRASH TRUCK UP TOO FAR. AND YOU DON'T POTENTIALLY, UH, COLLIDE WITH SOME CHILDREN AT PLAY OR ANYBODY ELSE. UM SO WE CAME UP WITH A GOOD PLAN AS TO HOW THAT COULD OCCUR. AND FOR THE TRASH TRUCK TO MOVE FORWARD REALLY IS ONLY A VERY LIMITED AREA BACK HERE, WHERE THE TRASH TRUCK WILL HAVE TO REVERSE TO BE ABLE TO GO THE OTHER WAY TO PICK UP THE TRASH CANS, WHICH IS ANOTHER POINT. SO WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO USE COMMON COMMUNITY DUMPSTERS. THIS IS ALL INDIVIDUAL TRASH CANS. THAT PEOPLE WILL KEEP INSIDE THEIR GARAGES AND PUT OUT ON TRASH DAY. UM WE HAVE A SMALL COMMUNITY POOL RIGHT HERE AGAINST ONLY 60 TOWN HOMES, SO WE DON'T REALLY DON'T HAVE A VERY HIGH DEMAND FOR A POOL IN THIS LOCATION, BUT WE'VE PROVIDED ONE THAT SIZED ACCORDING TO OUR EXPERIENCE THAT WE NEED AND SO WE'RE GOING TO PUT THAT RIGHT IN THERE WITH A SMALL, UH I WOULD CALL THE CLUBHOUSE BUT LIKE SOME, YOU KNOW, BATHROOMS, COMMANDER BATHS IN THE MAIL BOXES AND STUFF ARE IN THAT LOCATION RIGHT THERE. WE HAVE ONE HALF ACRE RETENTION LAKE. UM THE WE'VE PLANTED THIS WITH A LITERAL ZONE TO TRY AND GIVE IT MORE OF A NAP, NATURAL SHAPE AND WE'RE GOING TO BE HAVING A LOT OF LITTLE REAL PLANTING HAPPENING IN THAT AREA THERE AS WELL. SO SOME OF THE STUFF I'LL GET INTO A LITTLE FURTHER AS WE MOVE ON. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT REALLY STRUCK US AS AS ODD AND WAS RAISED TO US, ALSO BY TOWN PARK IS THAT THERE'S UH, WE CAN COMPLETE OUR ENTIRE SIDEWALK ALONG THIS FRONT EDGE HERE, BUT WE STILL HAVE A GAP RIGHT HERE BETWEEN THE EXISTING SIDEWALK THAT LEADS OUT [00:40:02] TO THE COMMERCIAL ON US ONE AND OUR PROPERTY. AND WE SAID, WELL, WE DON'T LIKE THAT BECAUSE WE NEED A PLACE FOR OUR RESIDENTS TO WALK. AND OF COURSE, THEY DON'T LIKE IT AND THEY'RE HAPPY THAT WE'RE PUTTING IN THIS THIS WIDE EIGHT FT. MULTI USE SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTHEAST CENTRAL HERE, WE SAID WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CONNECT THAT. AND WE'RE GOING TO ADD A SIDEWALK. THIS IS ACTUALLY IN IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. BETWEEN THERE'S AN EXISTING HEDGE THERE AND THE EDGE OF ASPHALT. NOW I'VE BEEN OUT THERE AND I'VE PERSONALLY MEASURED IT. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A FEAT. I THINK WE'VE GOT ABOUT SIX, SO IT'LL BE A LITTLE NARROWER THAN OUR SIDEWALK. BUT WE THINK THAT THIS IS A MAJOR PUBLIC BENEFIT THAT WE CAN COMPLETE THE SIDEWALK SO THAT WE HAVE A COMPLETE INTERCONNECTIVITY. AND THAT, OF COURSE, IS THE OTHER PROPERTIES COME IN AND GET DEVELOPED FURTHER TO THE WEST OF US, YOU KNOW THAT WILL CONNECT UP. SO I'M NOT REALLY GOING TO GO THROUGH ALL THIS STUFF. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT. OUR ENGINEER IS HERE AND CAN SPEAK TO IT. BUT I CAN TELL YOU THAT IN OUR PLAN, WE'VE ACTUALLY COME UP WITH AN EXCESS WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF 730. SO THAT'S SIGNIFICANT. AND WE DID THAT THROUGH THE USE OF BIO SWALES. WE DID THAT THROUGH THE USE OF SPECIAL GARDEN STYLE BUNKER GRATES ALONG OUR INTERNAL ROAD THAT ALLOW THE WATER TO GO DIRECTLY INTO THOSE BIO SWALES. AND YOU KNOW, BASICALLY HAVE COME UP WITH A WAY TO ALMOST IT'S ALMOST LIKE DRAINAGE ON STEROIDS. IT'S BASICALLY THESE THINGS THAT YOU CAN DO IN CAPRI , INCREASE YOUR CAPACITY AND YOUR ABILITY TO GO WAY FAR AND BEYOND WHAT YOU WOULD TYPICALLY DO. IF YOU WERE JUST MEETING STANDARD CODE REQUIREMENTS. WE'RE PRESERVING ABOUT 128 TREES WITHIN THE PERIMETER BUFFER AND ANOTHER 200. I'M SORRY. WE'RE ADDING 228 TREES IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER AND PRESERVED AND ADDING ANOTHER 203 TREES WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE SITES THAT FAR EXCEEDS WHAT'S REQUIRED BY THE CODE. WE FELT THAT WAS IMPORTANT. BECAUSE YOU KNOW IF YOU REMEMBER FROM OUR SITE PLAN, WE'VE GOT OUR BUILDINGS FACING OUTWARDS TOWARDS TOWN PARK. WELL, JUST LIKE THAT AS A BUFFER BETWEEN US AND TOWN PARK. THAT'S OUR THAT'S OUR RESIDENTS FRONT YARD, SO THAT'S IMPORTANT FOR US TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE HAPPY TO COME HOME TO. AND WHEN YOU COME OUT OF THE DOOR IN THE MORNING OR AT ANY TIME. TODAY YOU SEE A BEAUTIFUL TREE LINED PASSIVE PARK IF YOU WOULD CALL IT THAT. THAT WERE ALSO PRESERVING INTO CHUCK'S. AND THANK YOU, CHUCK. FOR THE TIME THAT WE SPENT EARLIER. UM WE'RE PRESERVING 16 EXISTING SLASH PINES SOME OF THE BEST MOST MATURE SLASH PINES ON THE PROPERTY. ARE ACTUALLY LOCATED AND WE'LL GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN AND SHOW YOU THIS BUT WELL LOCATED IN THE KIND OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE, WE ELIMINATED SOME UNITS THERE FROM OUR ORIGINAL PLANS, PULLED THOSE BACK AND SAID NO, LET'S CREATE A PASSIVE PARK HERE. WHERE WE CAN PRESERVE THESE TREES. IN ADDITION TO IN THAT AREA, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME SMALL BENCHES FOR PEOPLE TO SIT ON SOME DOGGY STATIONS SO PEOPLE RESIDENTS HOPEFULLY WILL CLEAN UP AFTER THEIR PETS. AND REALLY TRYING TO CREATE A VERY NICE AREA THERE FOR THE RESIDENTS TO USE. IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE'RE ADDING 4TH 20 FT OAK TREES ALONG SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY TO PROVIDE SHADES FOR PEDESTRIANS USING THAT PUBLIC SIDEWALK. WE'VE GOT A MINIMUM 25% NATIVE VEGETATION PROPOSED THROUGHOUT THE SITE, SO WE'RE USING FLORIDA NATIVE SPECIES, AND THEN WE TALKED ABOUT THE LITERAL SHELVES PREVIOUSLY. AND SO IF YOU LOOK AT THIS SITE PLAN AGAIN, SO THIS IS OUR PASSIVE PARK AREA BACK HERE, SO THIS FLOWS NICELY. THERE'S A SIDEWALK THAT RUNS BACK THROUGH HERE, WHICH IS THE SIDEWALK THAT PROVIDES NOT ONLY ACCESS TO THE FRONT OF THESE UNITS, BUT ALSO AS A KIND OF A PASSIVE PARK AREA. WE CAN WALK YOUR DOG. YOU MAY USE THAT JUST FOR JOGGING ARE GETTING TO THE POOL, ETCETERA. AND SO WE'VE GOT QUITE A BIT OF VEGETATION THAT'S IN THAT AREA. CHUCK ACTUALLY ASKED ME EARLIER ABOUT THESE PARTICULAR TREES THAT ARE HERE. AND I SAID, WE'RE ABSOLUTELY KEEPING THOSE THOSE STRADDLED THE PROPERTY LINE. THEY'RE NOT REALLY ON OUR PROPERTY, BUT THEY'RE NOT ON TOWN PARK, SO THEY'RE KIND OF BOTH. AND WE AGREED WITH TOWN PARK THAT WE'RE GOING TO PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN THOSE LARGE TREES. AND THEN, IN ADDITION, KEEPING AS MANY OF THESE, UH MATURE SLASH PINES AS WE POSSIBLY CAN IN THIS AREA HERE WE'VE GOT THESE OAK TREES LONG SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY HERE WITH A NICE SPECIMEN. LOOK AT THE AT THE ENTRANCE AGAIN. SO THE RENDERINGS FOR OUR PROJECT, SO WE FEEL REALLY GOOD ABOUT THESE. THESE UH TURNED OUT EXACTLY HOW WE ANTICIPATED. UM WE REALLY SPENT SOME TIME FOCUSING ON WHAT IS THE FLOOR. WHAT IS THE STUART VERNACULAR? WHAT BELONGS IN STEWART, YOU KNOW? WHICH I MENTIONED ALSO, YOU KNOW THAT THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES FOR THIS PROPERTY IS FOUR FLOORS, BUT WE DIDN'T THINK THAT WAS APPROPRIATE. AND SO INITIALLY, WHEN WE STARTED LOOKING AT THIS PROPERTY, WE SAID, YOU KNOW, MAYBE WE'LL DO YOU KNOW 75 UNITS THAT ARE THREE STORIES. UM AND THEN WE STARTED REALLY TALKING TO TOWN PARK AND LOOKING AT THE PLANS AND SAYING , YOU KNOW, WE REALLY CAN'T PUT THREE STORIES NEXT TO TOWN PARK . WE NEED TO BRING THE SCALE OF THIS DOWN, YOU KNOW, SO WE WENT TO 60 UNITS MADE THEM A LITTLE BIT LARGER AND BROUGHT THAT BROUGHT THAT, UM, THAT SITE THAT SCALE OF THE BUILDINGS DOWN. BUT [00:45:03] YOU CAN SEE JUST FROM THESE RENDERINGS. WE HAVE A LOT OF ARTICULATION. VERY INTERESTING. YOU KNOW, ROOF LINES AND ENDS AND OUTS OF THE BUILDINGS THAT WE REALLY THINK THAT THIS IS GOING TO PROVIDE A REALLY PLEASANT AESTHETIC WHEN YOU COME DOWN CENTRAL PARKWAY. SAYS, JUST LOOKING THROUGH THE FRONT ENTRANCE INTO THE SITE. OF COURSE, THERE'S MORE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED THAN WHAT YOU SEE HERE. BUT IF WE PUT ALL THE LANDSCAPING YOU WOULDN'T SEE THE BUILDINGS SO THAT WOULD DEFEAT OUR PURPOSE HERE. AND THE POOL AREA AT THE CLUBHOUSE. SO JUST JUST SOME HIGHLIGHTS. UM SOME OF THIS COMPARES THIS TO WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN WITH A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOME OF THIS IS REALLY JUST TALKING ABOUT BENEFITS IN GENERAL IN TERMS OF THE AESTHETIC. BUT WE, YOU KNOW , VERSUS A COMMERCIAL PROJECT. WE HAVE A LOT OF SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED TRAFFIC GENERATION. I THINK YOU'VE SEEN THAT. AS A MATTER OF FACT WE HAD SUSAN O'ROURKE, WHO'S OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER. TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT WOULD THE TRAFFIC IS? THE NUMBERS THAT WERE PRESENTED EARLIER FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE REALLY SHOW YOU THE MAXIMUM. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD TO THE MAXIMUM. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD 100 AND 6000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL HERE AND YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD 151 146 UNITS, SO I SAID, WELL, LET'S LET'S START TO LOOK AT YOU KNOW WHAT? WHAT? WHAT WOULD IT HAVE BEEN? WHAT WOULD IT HAVE BEEN? IF THIS WAS A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT? WORK IT WAS A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED. WHAT WOULD IT HAVE BEEN? THE TRAFFIC DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS APPROVED IN 2007 VERSUS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TODAY. AND I BELIEVE THE ANSWER IS IT'S ABOUT A 42% I DON'T HAVE IT IN HERE, BUT IT'S IN MY NOTES IN MY HEAD. THAT'S ABOUT A 42% REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC BETWEEN WHAT WAS APPROVED. VERSUS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING WITH 60 TOWN HOMES. THAT'S A PRETTY SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC. LESS ASPHALT, OF COURSE, MORE GREEN SPACE. INCREASED COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD HAS BEEN DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. I THINK THAT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS. WE'RE USING A REAL TRANSITIONAL COASTAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLE THAT'S CONTEMPORARY BUT KEEPS WITH STUART SMALL SCALE COASTAL VERNACULAR REAR LOADED UNITS, INCREASE AESTHETICS AND PROVIDE THAT BUFFERING THAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT FROM THE NEIGHBORS. A SINGLE ENTRANCE FROM SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY. THE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN ACTUALLY HAD TWO ENTRANCES. SO WE THINK THAT'S A SAFER CONDITION. WE'VE GOT ONE ENTRANCE THAT'S ALIGNED WITH RAISE WAY ONLY. UM AND PROVISION OF DRAINAGE, SO THERE IS ACTUALLY AN EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF TOWN PARK THAT RUNS THROUGH OUR PROPERTY, AND THAT'S BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY WAS GOING TO BE A FUTURE CASE OF TOWN PARK. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT CAME OUT OF OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE NEIGHBORS IS THAT THEY HAVE THEIR EXPERIENCING SOME FLOODING ISSUES BEHIND THEIR POOL AND WHICH IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO OUR PROPERTY ON THE NORTH NORTHWEST SIDE. AND SO WE SAID, WELL, WHAT CAN WE DO TO FIX THAT? BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EASEMENT THROUGH OUR PROPERTY, SO WE ACTUALLY CAME UP WITH A PLAN. WE'RE GOING TO BE INSTALLING A CATCH, BASIN A DRAINAGE INLET THEIR UM AND WE'RE GOING TO INSTALL A PIPE THAT ACTUALLY WILL BRING THEIR STORM WATER INTO OUR PROJECT OFFICIALLY AND PUT IT INTO OUR LAKE AND WE'VE ACCOMMODATED. THAT IN THE OF THAT WE DONE. BUT UM, THESE ARE ALL FEE SIMPLE FORESAIL UNITS BECAUSE WE WANT PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP. SO WE'VE ACTUALLY GOT, UM, RESTRICTIONS TYPICALLY BUILT INTO OUR DOCUMENTS THAT SAY THAT YOU CANNOT BUY MULTIPLE UNITS AND YOU CANNOT RENT THEM FOR SO LONG AFTER YOU'VE BOUGHT ONE. WE WANT PEOPLE TO LIVE THERE AND TO HAVE THAT PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP SO THAT THEY TAKE CARE OF THE PLACE. UM, WE'VE GOT DENSE BUFFERING THAT WE TALKED ABOUT BETWEEN US AND TOWN PARK. TREATMENT GATIEN IS ON SITE INSTEAD OF CASH AND LOU, WHICH WAS AN ALTERNATIVE OPTION. WE DID NOT DO THAT BEAUTIFICATION OF SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY MEDIA, AND WE TALKED ABOUT THE WE'RE GOING TO CONSTRUCT ITS APPROXIMATELY I WANT TO SAY 22 OR 23 ON STREET. PARKING SPACE. IN FRONT OF THE PROJECT THAT ARE IN A FIRST COME. FIRST SERVE. BASIS. TO THE . COULD BE FOR ANYBODY. UM AND WE TALKED ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SIDEWALK EXTENSION LEADING OVER TO US ONE. SO OUR DENSITY SO AT 60 UNITS FOR THIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS 4.8 ACRES WERE AT 12.3 DWELLING UNITS TO THE ACRE VERSUS THE MAXIMUM OF 30. SO WE'RE NOT PUSHING THE LIMIT THERE BY ANY MEANS. AGAIN WE TALKED ABOUT SIGNIFICANTLY LESS TRAFFIC THAN THE MAXIMUM DENSITY WOULD ALLOW THE END TWO STORY BUILDINGS VERSUS THE FOUR SO WE HAVE A COUPLE OF REQUESTS FOR RELIEF FROM THE CODE. THE FIRST OF WHICH IS A 25 FT FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT AND WE'RE PROPOSING A 10 FT FRONT SETBACK . SO IT'S A REQUEST OF A 15 FT. RELIEF FROM THE CODE REQUIREMENTS AND THAT'S REALLY BECAUSE AND IT'S IN THIS AREA RIGHT HERE ALONG SOUTH EAST CENTRAL IS BECAUSE YOU CANNOT DO A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT PUSHING THOSE BUILDINGS UP TO THE STREET . UM, SO THAT'S THE LOOK WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE ALONG THE STREET, SO IN ORDER TO GET THE BUILDINGS THAT CLOSE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GET A SETBACK. WAIVER. AND THAT ALSO HAS A US TO PUT THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION [00:50:01] ON THE INSIDE INSTEAD OF ON THE OUTSIDE, BECAUSE IF WE IF WE PUSH THOSE BACK, THEY WOULD PROBABLY END UP BACK EVEN FARTHER, AND THEN WE HAVE A RING ROAD AROUND THE OUTSIDE. THE SECOND ONE. IS FOR SMALL INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF PREVIOUS AREA. UM WE WERE ASKING FOR A 4.7% INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM TO GO FROM 65% TO 6 69.7. BUT WE'VE OFFSET THAT AGAIN THROUGH THE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES THAT WE'VE DONE, WHICH IS PROVIDING AGAIN, SIGNIFICANTLY MORE DRAINAGE, WATER QUALITY THAN WHAT YOU WOULD OTHERWISE SEE. AND THE LAST ONE IS FOR A SMALL THREE FT REDUCTION IN THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALKS NOW THE SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH EAST CENTRAL, AND WE STRONGLY BELIEVE IT SHOULD BE AN EIGHT FT. SIDEWALK AND ABSOLUTELY CODE. AND SO WE'RE PROPOSING A PET ALONG SOUTHEAST CENTRAL BECAUSE THAT IS NOT ONLY GOING TO BE OUR RESIDENTS, BUT GENERAL PUBLIC. SO THAT'S A THAT'S PROBABLY AN EIGHT FT SIDEWALK IT PROVIDES FOR. UH IT'S MULTIMODAL. YOU KNOW, YOU COULD WALK. YOU CAN RIDE A BIKE. YOU CAN RIDE A SCOOTER. YOU'RE NOT RUNNING INTO PEOPLE. UM, AND THAT'S ABSOLUTELY APPROPRIATE IN ORDER FOR US TO REALLY IMPLEMENT THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO ON SITE. WE NEED A LITTLE RELIEF FROM THE INTERNAL SIDEWALKS AND SO FIVE. FT IS PLENTY WIDE TO WALK YOUR DOG TO TAKE YOUR TOWELS AND GO TO THE POOL, UM, AND TO GET AROUND THROUGH THE COMMUNITY, SO WE DO HAVE A SMALL REDUCTION IN THE IN THE DEVIL, WHERE REQUESTED SMALL REDUCTION IN THE SIDEWALK WITH ONLY INTERNAL TO THE PROPERTY. UM SO AGAIN, THIS ENTIRE SIDEWALK HERE IS EIGHT FT WIDE AND THEN THE SIDEWALKS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT WHERE WE NEED A LITTLE BIT OF RELIEF, OR JUST THE SIDEWALKS THAT RUN AROUND THE BACK SIDE HERE AND THE ONE THAT RUNS AROUND THE LAKE. AND SO WE'RE ASKING FOR TOO SMALL BUT FIVE FT. WHICH WE FEEL IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE TYPE OF USE AND THE SCALE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. NEIGHBORHOOD PARTICIPATION. THIS IS PRETTY MUCH TOUCHED ON ALREADY. WE HAD NUMEROUS MEETINGS WITH TOWN PARK STARTING BACK IN NOVEMBER. IN WHICH CERTAINLY OBVIOUSLY CULMINATED IN, UH, POSITIVE SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT. WE WERE ABLE TO ADDRESS AND ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS AND COME TO AGREEMENT ON A FEW THINGS ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY, AND I THINK EVERYBODY IS PLEASED WITH THE OUTCOME OF HOW THAT HAS GONE. AND AS YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE. WE HAVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED REZONING. FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT IS ALREADY DONE AND THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECT WITH ITS CONSULTANTS AND FOUND US TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, INCLUDING ALL CONCURRENCY STANDARDS, SUBJECT TO THE THREE REQUESTED WAIVERS, AND THEY FIND THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH MANY OF THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPLAINTS SUPPORTS COMPACT URBAN DEVELOPMENT. WITH THE PROPOSED FRONT SETBACK REDUCTIONS INTERCONNECTED SIDEWALK SYSTEM ON STREET PARKING, DENSE LANDSCAPING ARCHITECTURE WITH FRONT PORCHES AND RELOADED GARAGES AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 87 DASH. 2022. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT ARE ATTACHED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT. THAT'S IN YOUR PACKET, AND WE AGREE WITH THOSE CONDITIONS. WE HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE CONDITIONS AS PROPOSED. AND AGAIN. I'M HERE, OF COURSE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE HAVE OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CIVIL ENGINEER, UM ONE OF OUR JOINT VENTURE PARTNERS IS HERE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS IT RELATES TO THE PRODUCT THAT WE'RE DOING HERE AND OUR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AS WELL. KELLY. I'M GOING TO IF YOU DON'T MIND. I'M JUST GOING TO FINISH UP STAFFS PRESENTATION FOR SURE. SO THE APPLICANT DID A GREAT JOB AT, UM GOING THROUGH THEIR PROPOSAL, BUT I WANTED TO GO OVER A COUPLE OF THINGS FROM A CODE PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC. THAT NUMBER THAT HE WAS LOOKING FOR. IT IS AN OVERALL DECREASE FROM THE 2000 AND SEVEN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. IT'S AN OVERALL DECREASE OF 334 DAILY TRIPS. UM AND THEN, IN TERMS OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONSISTS OF THAT 5.5 ACRE LAKE TO TREAT STORMWATER GENERATED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS ACCEPTING OFFSITE FLOWS FROM THE TOWN TOWN PARK NORTH COMMUNITY. ULTIMATE OUTFALL REMAINS AS EXISTING, WHICH IS TO JUST DISCHARGED TO THE SOUTH INTO THE TOWN PARK SOUTH BASIN AND DISCHARGE EVENTUALLY REACHES PUBLISHING CREEK AND THE ST LUCIE RIVER. THE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT THAT'S BEEN PROPOSED , SUCH AS THE PREVIOUS PAVERS, THE BIO SWALES IN THE BUNKER IN CLIP IN LET'S RETAIN ADDITIONAL STORMWATER AND WILL REDUCE NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS DISCHARGED LOADS. PRIOR TO DISCHARGING INTO PUBLIC PUBLICAN CREEK. UM HE HAD TOUCHED ON THIS A LITTLE BIT EARLIER. BUT THERE IS ONE INGRESS EGRESS POINT ON A SOUTH EAST CENTRAL PARKWAY AND ONE THING THAT STAFF WANTED TO KNOW IS THAT THERE IS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT REQUIRES A SIDEWALK CONNECTION BETWEEN BUILDING SEVEN AND BUILDING EIGHT, WHICH IS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. CURRENTLY THAT IS THE ONLY MISSING LINK AND INTERCONNECTED SIDEWALK SYSTEM. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WILL BE REQUESTING THE APPLICANT, UM, COMPLY WITH AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. AND IN REGARDS TO THE 60 TOWN HOMES. THERE ARE 12 TOWN HOSTS TOWN HOME BUILDINGS. THERE ARE 4 TO 7 UNITS PER BUILDING, FIVE BUILDINGS FRONT CENTRAL [00:55:04] PARKWAY, THREE BUILDINGS FROM THE LAKE AND FOUR BUILDINGS FRONT. NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER. UM EVER UNITS FRONT DOOR CONNECTS TO THIS INTERCONNECTED SIDEWALK SYSTEM WITH THE REAR LOADED GARAGES IN THE REAR. SO BUILDINGS ARE RELOADED AND CONNECTED THROUGH THE INTERNAL VEHICULAR LOOP. UM I DO WANT TO MENTION THAT STAFF DID WORK WITH THE APPLICANT EXTENSIVELY TO PRINT TO PRESERVE THOSE 16 TREES, 11 OF WHICH BEING THE SLASH PINES AND TO PROVIDE THAT PASSIVE PARK, THE APPLICANT DID SPEND QUITE A BIT OF TIME REDESIGNING THEIR SITE PLAN THROUGHOUT THE STAFF REVIEW PROCESS IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THOSE TREES AND IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THAT PASSIVE PARK AS AN AMENITY STAFF DID WANT TO NOTE THAT, UM THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY DID REQUEST THAT THAT PASSIVE PARK REMAINS OPEN TO TOWN PARK. HOWEVER IT WAS WITHIN THEIR NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM TO ADD THAT FENCE. THE APPLICANT MEETS THE REQUIRED PARKING, AND, UH, ACTUALLY EXCEEDS THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED VEHICULAR PARKING AND BICYCLE PARKING. SO UM, 160 SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THAT IS MEANT SOLELY WITH THE TWO CAR GARAGES FOREVER UNIT. ADDITIONALLY 22 ON STREET PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROPOSED AND 15 INTERNAL GUESTS , SPACES AND HANDICAP SPACES ARE BEING PROPOSED. REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRES ONE RACK OR TWO SPACES FOR EVERY 10 UNITS, AND THE APPLICANT HAS DOUBLED. UM THAT REQUIREMENT WITH WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING WITH SIX RACKS AND 12 BICYCLE SPACES, ALL LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ADJACENT TO THE INTERCONNECTED PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS SYSTEM. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 100% NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL. UM RYAN DID A GREAT JOB OF EXPLAINING THIS A LITTLE BIT FURTHER. THE APPLICANT IS EXCEEDING THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT OF 30.4% AND EXCEEDING THE NATIVE VEGETATION AREA OF 28.3% WERE 25% IS REQUIRED. IN TERMS OF THE ARCHITECTURE. THE BUILDINGS ARE NINE FT. EIGHT INCHES TALL TO THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF AND 27 FT AND NOT NINE INCHES TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF. AND THE APPLICANT HAS EXCEEDED REQUIREMENTS IN REGARD IN REGARDS TO PROVIDING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PROJECTIONS AND RECESSES, TOWER FEATURES BALCONIES, SHUTTERS AND CLOUDING THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED WITH STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL HE'S SEEN UNITS ARE ON THE SIDES OF EACH BUILDING, SO THEY DON'T INTERFERE WITH ANYBODY ENJOYING, UM THEIR FRONT PATIO AREA. AND THE BUILDING ORIENTATION CREATES INTERACTION WITH BOTH THE LOCAL STREET AND THE COMMON AREAS. SO THERE IS MORE EYES OF THE STREET EYES ON THE STREET, WHICH UM, WHICH IS A PLANNING PRINCIPLES IN TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL. LAST RENDERING WAS A VIEW FROM CENTRAL PARK. YES, IT WAS. IN REGARDS TO MONUMENT SIGNAGE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 24 SQUARE FOOT. UM MONUMENT SIGN FOUR FT. TALL BY SIX FT. WIDE IT IS BACK. I BELIEVE A TOTAL OF 19 FT. AH FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED WITH STAFF TO ENSURE THAT THE LOCATION OF THIS MONUMENT SIGN DOES NOT IMPEDE ANY VEHICULAR SAFETY. UM, THE APPLICANT DID GO OVER THESE WAIVER REQUESTS A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I WANTED TO MENTION AS A PART OF STAFF ANALYSIS IN REGARDS TO WAIVER REQUEST NUMBER ONE, WHICH IS THE FRONT SETBACK IN ORDER TO CREATE AN URBAN WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S IMPORTANT TO PRIDE BUILDINGS THAT ARE CLOSE TO IN FRONT OF THE STREET IN ORDER TO CREATE THAT INTERACTION BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY. UM AND THAT'S IN THAT'S INVOLVED WITH CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN. IN REGARDS TO WAIVER REQUEST NUMBER TWO, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE. UM THIS CODE REQUIREMENT ALLOWS FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TO FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, UM, AND ALL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS AREA TO 65. AH MULTI FAMILY IS USUALLY LESS THAN THAT, HOWEVER, TOWNHOUSES FUNCTION MORE SIMILARLY TO TWO FAMILY DUPLEXES THAN THEY DO MULTI FAMILY APARTMENTS AND CONDOMINIUMS. SO AS SUCH, THIS CODE SECTION IS MORE APPROPRIATE TO BE UTILIZED FOR THIS PROJECT AND THE MULTI FAMILY REQUIREMENT. THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED BIO SWALES PERVIOUS PAVERS RAIN BUNKERS, AS REQUESTED BY STAFF FOR INCORPORATION OF LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE CODE AND PROPOSED STORMWATER DESIGN AND HAS BEEN REVIEWED IN A BIRTH BY STAFF. AND FINALLY, WE HAVE A REQUEST NUMBER THREE, WHICH IS THE DECREASE FROM EIGHT FT WIDE SIDEWALKS TO FIVE FT SIDE FIVE FT WIDE SIDEWALKS. UM THE MOST IMPORTANT. WAS THE CENTRAL PARKWAY, UM, SIDEWALK, AND SO IF THE APPLICANT FIELDS THAT'S FIVE FT OF SUFFICIENT INTERNALLY STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THAT WAIVER REQUEST AS WELL. SO THE PROPOSAL REZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH AND COMPLEMENTARY TO ADJACENT USES ALONG THE SOUTHEAST CENTRAL PARKWAY CORRIDOR. THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS AND EXCEEDS THE CITY'S CODE WHERE WAIVERS ARE REQUESTED. THE APPLICANT IS ACT [01:00:03] ADEQUATELY JUSTIFIED THOSE WAIVERS BY PROPOSING AN URBAN RESIDENTIAL PROJECT THAT PROMOTES WORKABILITY PRESERVES THE EXISTING TREES. PROVIDES PASSIVE RECREATION AND BEAUTIFIES THE CENTRAL PARKWAY. ROADWAY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MOVED FORWARD TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE TWO FOUR 8 7-2022, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? DO WE HAVE ANY VIRTUAL PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY BOARD COMMENT? JUST A POINT OF CLARIFICATION. ERIN I HEARD YOU SAY, 100% NATIVE VEGETATION, BUT I BELIEVE I HEARD RYAN SAY 25% NATIVE VEGETATION. UM THE NATIVE VEGETATION AREA REQUIREMENT IN THE CODE IS 25% AND THAT'S THE AREA, NOT NECESSARILY THE SPECIES. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 100% NATIVE LANDSCAPE SPECIES ON THE PROJECT. AWESOME. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. I JUST HAVE ONE DO YOU HAVE ON STREET PARKING ELSEWHERE ON CENTRAL PARKWAY? AS PART OF THE CENTRAL PART LOSS PROJECT, THE PROPOSED ON STREET PARKING AND STAFF WORKED WITH THIS PROPOSAL TO REFLECT THE SIMILAR DESIGN ALONG THAT STRETCH. KELLY WE DO HAVE A COMMENT FROM RYAN STROME . SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT ME TO WAIT UNTIL THE END. OR IF YOU WANT ME TO GO AHEAD AND READ HIS COMMENT NOW. IS THERE A PROPER ORDER? OKAY, READ RYAN'S COMMENT. OKAY? UM LET'S SEE. WHERE DO YOU WANT ME TO READ IT ? I MEAN, IT'S OKAY. I CAN READ IT. OKAY BELOW IS MY GREATEST CONCERN WITH THIS PROJECT. I WOULD LIKE THE HIGHLIGHTED SECTION BELOW. TO BE READ INTO THE MINUTES. I DO NOT THINK A STIPULATION IN THE DOCUMENTS REQUIRING ALL UNIT OWNERS TO PARK THEIR CARS IN THEIR GARAGES IS SUFFICIENT TO ME THIS CONCERNED BECAUSE IN REALITY, IT IS NOT PRACTICAL. SORRY. I CANNOT ATTEND THIS EVENING. WHEN I COMPARE THIS DEVELOPMENT TO A LOT OF OTHER RESIDENTIAL TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA, THE VERY SMALL, DRY VIAL OF 20 FT WITH NO DRIVEWAY PARKING IN FRONT OF EACH UNIT IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN. MOST OTHER DEVELOPMENTS HAVE A WIDER AISLE WITH SIDEWALKS ON EACH SIDE IN A DRIVEWAY LEADING UP TO THE GARAGE. IN REALITY, MANY OCCUPANTS ARE GOING TO PARK AT LEAST ONE VEHICLE OUTSIDE THEIR GARAGE BASED ON THE GARAGE DEPTHS OF 20, FT BY 19 FT FOUR INCHES, IT IS IMPRACTICAL TO FIT TWO VEHICLES. INTO EACH OF THESE UNITS AND IMPOSSIBLE TO FIT A LOT OF TRUCKS BASED UPON THOSE STEPS. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? QUESTIONS? MADAM CHAIR, CAN I? IT'S NOT A QUESTION, BUT ASSIST MY CLIENT. THE DEVELOPER HAS AGREED THAT I WORKED FOR THE CLIENT. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH VOTING, AND, UH BUT I'D LIKE TO KNOW AS ANY BOARD MEMBERS FEEL THAT THERE'S A CONFLICT. NO. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP. OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER? I JUST WANT TO SAY, UM I FEEL LIKE THE PROJECT IS VERY REFRESHING AND THAT IT'S BRINGING IN A NEW UM. FEEL AND A NEW CULTURE TO STEWART. SOMETHING THAT'S YOUNG AND FRESH . NOT EVERYBODY BEHIND GATES. AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THIS BECAUSE I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO SOME OF HER BRILLIANT YOUNG PROFESSIONAL CHILDREN COMING BACK TO LIVING IN STEWART, AND I'M HOPING THAT THIS WILL DO IT FOR US THAT I LOOK FORWARD TO MORE OF THESE KINDS OF PROJECTS. I WOULD AGREE WITH HER COMMENTS. UM, ANY OTHERS? UH, YOU NEED TO FILL OUT AGAIN. OKAY, FILL OUT THE FORM AGAIN. YOU CAN GO UP AND SEE. OKAY? SIR. PLEASE COME FORWARD. YOU. SIR SIR. COME OVER HERE. WE HAVE TO FOLLOW FORMAL PROCEDURE. YES IT'S GOING TO BE PUBLIC COMMENT AGAIN AND IT WILL BE THREE MINUTES. YEAH UH, ARE THEY GOING TO DO. IN ITS CHILDREN ALLOWED. IS THERE ANY AGE RESTRICTION? I THINK IT'S WHAT HE'S ASKING. IS THERE ANY AGE? NO SIR. THERE'S NO AGE RESTRICTION. UH, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I DON'T THINK IT'S BEEN THREE MINUTES TO ENFORCE. THE RULE ABOUT CAN'T RENT THEM OUT, OR YOU CAN. SO THAT THAT'S WRITTEN INTO THE DOCUMENTS. AND [01:05:04] SO THAT'S UP TO THE BOARD TO ENFORCE AFTER WE'RE NOT WHEN WE'RE NO LONGER THE DECLARING OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH MEANS THAT WE'RE NOT THE DEVELOPER AND WE TURN THE ASSOCIATION OVER. THAT WILL BE UP TO THE LORD. THANK YOU, SIR. ALRIGHT. WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? SO MOST. WE HAVE A SECOND WE HAVE TO. WE HAVE TO GIVE THE FORMAL WITH THE MOTION IS PROBABLY YES. IF YOU MOVE TO APPROVE YOU, PLEASE. PLEASE SAY MOVED TO APPROVE. OKAY I MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROJECT. WITH A 2ND 2ND JOYFULLY, OKAY? JORDAN'S. VICE CHAIR, BROWNFIELD. YES. BOARD MEMBER MATHERS. REMEMBER MATH THING? YES REMEMBER VITALI? YES CHAIR. LAUREN? YES. THANK YOU. OKAY I THINK LAST. I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU AS WELL. I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITH THE COMMENTS THAT BOARD MEMBER BRUMFIELD MADE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE VERY EXCITED TO BRING SOMETHING THAT'S UNIQUE AND FRESH TO THE CITY. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. [STAFF UPDATE] OKAY. STAFF UPDATE. SPEAKING THE STAFF AH! STAFF DON'T HAVE ANY UPDATE TODAY. THAT IS NOT TRUE. GIVE US UPDATE, UM I HAVE ACCEPTED A POSITION AT FORT PIERCE AS THE PLANNING DIRECTOR UP THERE, HOWEVER. I'VE WORKED WITH THE CITY MANAGER WHO'S BEEN VERY FLEXIBLE IN THAT I'LL BE STILL RETURNING HERE IS DOING SOME PART TIME WORK AND HELPING MOVE SOME PROJECTS THROUGH WHILE THE CITY GETS A DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OKAY? AND DO WE HAVE THE CITY MANAGER? I SEE DEPARTED US, MR. MARTEL PERHAPS YOU KNOW ANYBODY, UM, WHERE? HOW THE IS THERE BEEN AN ANNOUNCEMENT MADE? WHERE ARE WE? IN THE SEARCH FOR A REPLACEMENT. I'LL BE HERE FOR THAT. BOTH JOBS. NO SO THEN, GOODNESS. UH A SEARCH FOR THE REPLACEMENT HASN'T ACTUALLY STARTED AS A HAS COME RATHER QUICKLY, SO OKAY, PROBABLY START NEXT WEEK. I WILL TELL YOU, UM RANDOMLY. UNRELATED TO THE PLANNING POSITION. WE HAD SOME OTHER POSITIONS ADVERTISED IN THE DIRECTOR WAS COMMENTING ABOUT DIFFERENT SITES THAT THE CITY USES. TO ADVERTISE JOBS AND I WAS ON A COUPLE OF THEM YESTERDAY. SO I TYPED THE WORD PLANNER IN AND I HAD TO REVISE IT BECAUSE SOME OF IT WAS EVENT PLANNERS. BUT WHEN I TYPED LIKE URBAN PLANNER IN I FOUND THAT JUPITER WAS LOOKING FOR URBAN PLANNERS. MARTIN COUNTY IS LOOKING FOR TWO OR THREE URBAN PLANNERS. PORT SAINT LUCIE IS LOOKING FOR TO URBAN PLANNERS. AND CITY OF STEWART WILL BE LOOKING FOR URBAN PLANNERS SO IT SHOULD BE A INTERESTING YOUNG PEOPLE HAVE A SAY BOTH OF MY SONS TO CHANGE TO BE WHAT I WOULD SAY WITH ALL OF THAT IS, I HOPE WE'RE ORDERED OFFERING A COMPETITIVE SALARY RANGE AND WE'RE GOING TO FIND THAT OUT. YES. YEAH. THERE IS OBVIOUSLY THAT'S RIGHT, AND IT'S PART OF IT IS OBVIOUSLY THE CRUSH. MOVEMENT ON THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS IT RELATES TO PROVIDING THAT JUST HOUSING BUT INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUSINESSES AND BUILDINGS AND YOU NAME IT FULL CITIES. AND HAS THERE BEEN ANY OTHER MOVEMENT ON THE COSTCO PROJECT, OR IS IT STILL THERE WAS A WAY IT WORKS IS THE CABINET. WOULD HEAR IT. MEETS QUARTERLY. OKAY THE JUNE MEETING. WAS CANCELED BY THE CABINET. I DON'T KNOW WHY, BUT I SUPPOSE THEY THE REASON TO CANCEL IT. AND SO IT MAY HAVE BEEN BECAUSE THEY HAD A SPECIAL SESSION OR WHATEVER. AND NOW THE NEXT POTENTIAL MEETING IS AUGUST. OKAY AFTER THAT. THE NEXT POTENTIAL MEETING IS DECEMBER, OKAY? OKAY, WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. I BELIEVE DOES IT NEED TO BE OFFICIAL? OKAY PERFECT. YEAH I JUST DIDN'T WANT TO COME AND SAY HI, KIMBERLY EVERMAN. I'M ON YOUR AGENDA, AND I'M ALWAYS SITTING IN THE AUDIENCE WHEN RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS COME UP. AND THIS IS RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM OUR DISTRICT, SO I THINK YOU ALL DID. A GREAT JOB. APPLICANT DID A WONDERFUL JOB BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A GREAT COMMUNITY FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE EMPLOYEES FOR POTENTIAL FAMILIES THAT CAN [01:10:01] AFFORD THEM. ANXIOUS TO SEE THE PRICE POINT IS EVERYBODY IS, OF COURSE, BUT I JUST WANTED TO, UM SAY, YOU KNOW, GOOD JOB. AND IF YOU EVER SEE ME IN THE AUDIENCE, AND I'M HERE FOR RESIDENTIAL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD RELATIVE, I'M HERE , OK, OKAY. THANK YOU. [ADJOURNMENT] FANTASTIC, OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY, WE AR * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.