Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[ROLL CALL]

[00:00:04]

OKAY GOOD EVENING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WELCOME TO THE REGULAR STUART CITY COMMISSION MEETING AND I'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? MAYOR MCDONALD HERE, COMMISSIONER BRUNO COMMISSIONER CLARK HERE. COMMISSIONER COLLINS AND COMMISSIONER RICH HERE. OKAY GREAT. THANK YOU. AND THEN IF YOU WOULD JOIN ME FOR A MOMENT OF SILENCE, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. THANK YOU. OKAY SIX. AMERICA AND WHICH IS SAYING ONE NATION. THANK YOU. EVERYONE. PLEASE BE SEATED. OKAY? COMMENTS BY

[COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONERS]

COMMISSIONERS. COMMISSIONER RIC. COMMISSIONER MEYER JUST WALKED IN, AND I'D LIKE TO SAY I WAS FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO ATTEND THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES MEETING. AND I GOT TO LISTEN TO DR TIM MOORE, WHOSE IMPRESSIVE FIGURE BUT THEY ALL SPOKE VERY HIGHLY OF COMMISSIONER MEYER. THEY FELT HIS CONTRIBUTIONS WERE INVALUABLE. AND I WAS. VERY HAPPY TO HEAR OF THE MANY VALUABLE CONTRIBUTIONS HE MADE TO THAT ORGANIZATION. AND I WAS LUCKY ENOUGH. I WAS HANDED AND AWARD A CERTIFICATE TO HAND TO HIM, AND I MET WITH HIM LATER THAT EVENING AND WAS HAPPY TO GIVE IT TO HIM. SO CONGRATULATIONS, COMMISSIONER MEYER. THE ONLY OTHER, HMM. THE ONLY OTHER COMMENT I HAVE IS I WOULD LIKE TO. I ASKED TO ADD AN ITEM. TO THE END OF THE AGENDA THIS EVENING. I WOULD ASK THAT WE DISCUSSED THE UTILITY RATES MOTION. AND NOT BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT CHARGED BECAUSE NO MATTER WHICH DECISION WE HAD MADE, WE WOULD BE CHARGING THE RATEPAYERS THAT SAME BUT WHAT WE DID DO IS PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF CONSIDERING THAT 3.24 ACRE OF LAND. FOR WORKFORCE HOUSING. AND WHY I'D LIKE TO PUT IT AT THE END OF THE AGENDA TONIGHT IS BECAUSE I KNOW THERE ARE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HERE FROM THE PUBLIC WHO LEAKED WHO WISH TO SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE, AND I THINK WE SHOULD HEAR FROM THEM FIRST, BEFORE WE HAVE OUR OWN DISCUSSION. SO DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC COMING , YOU WOULD MOVE TO ADD THAT ITEM TO THE END OF THE AGENDA, CORRECT THAT EMOTION. YES BUT HE'S MOVING TO ADD THIS DURING THE APPROVAL. WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADD LIME TO AGENDA. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? THE SECOND. OKAY SO WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. AND SO IT'S JUST A NINE HOLE. IT IS JUST ADDING ITEMS TO THE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION. SO WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND. UM AND, UH SO WE DO. WE HAVE A GUESS WE DO IT ALL IN FAVOR. ALL IN FAVOR. I POST OKAY. MOTION CARRIES WHY THAT'S AT THE END. OKAY ANYTHING ELSE? COMMISSIONER RICHARD THANK YOU. I GOT YOUR NAME RIGHT TONIGHT. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER COLLINS. OKAY NO COMMENT. COMMISSIONER BRUNER.

COMMISSIONER CLARK. YES, THANK YOU. UM I WANTED. I KNOW WE HAD A WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A C R A PRESENTATION TODAY, BUT WE JUST HAD A CRE MEDIA AND I FORGOT TO ASK THIS OF THE SERIE MEETING, BUT THE CRE HAD ABOUT $750,000 FOR, UM, HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS, AND I KNOW THAT I WOULD BE ADMINISTERED BY THE GUARDIAN OR THAT GROUP DOWN IN HOMESTEAD. AND I KNOW THAT THIS THEORY WAS WAITING TO GET SOME CLARIFICATION FROM THE STATE AND TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL OF THE APPLICATIONS WERE IN ORDER. AND IT'S HURRICANE TIME AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN WAITING TO SEE IF THEY'RE GOING TO BE APPROVED THAT I JUST WANTED TO ASK MR GANDHI, UH, THIS WHEN THOSE THINGS ARE GOING TO COME THROUGH SO THAT WE CAN KNOW. RESIDENTS CAN KNOW WHEN THEY'RE GOING. IF THEY'RE YOU KNOW, ABLE TO GET THE QUALIFICATION AND GET THE FUNDING ARE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO DO THE WORK. ACTUALLY THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET ANY MONEY, PERCY RIGHT, SO THAT ITEM IS ACTUALLY COMING BEFORE THE BOARD IN OCTOBER, 10TH. I BELIEVE THAT'S FIRST CITY COMMISSION MEETING. UH, WE JUST RECENTLY RECEIVED A LETTER OF NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST. WE WERE WAITING FOR THAT WAIVER. SO THAT'S BEEN CLEARED, AND WE ALSO HAVE A LIST THE RANKING LIST

[00:05:03]

FROM THE GUARDIAN. SO I HAD THAT LIST ALSO. SO I WILL BE SHARING THAT WITH THE BOARD ON AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING. THANK YOU RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN ASKING, OKAY. AND I'M THANKFUL THAT WE GOT THE FINAL MILLAGE AND EVERYTHING DONE TODAY. THAT WAS IMPORTANT. I TOO HAVE BEEN APPOINTED TO BE A MEMBER OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT COMMITTEES AS A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CITY COMMISSION, AND ONE OF THEM HAS BEEN THE ARMED TRICYCLES REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. ON FRIDAY, WE HAD A MEETING AT THE INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE. AND, UM ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT CAME UP WAS REGARDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING , AND THEY HAD SEVERAL PRESENTATIONS FROM DIFFERENT PERSONS IN THE COMMUNITY. INDIAN RIVER ST LUCIE COUNTY, PALM BEACH COUNTY THAT TALKS ABOUT DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF HOW TO HAVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOW TO CREATE CERTAIN WAYS TO EFFECTUATE THAT. AND THAT WAS A VERY GOOD PRESENTATION. SO WHETHER THE PUBLIC OR OUR COMMISSIONERS CAN GO TO THE CHURCH, OF COURSE, REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND LOOK AT, UM THAT PRESENTATION FOR THE 23RD OF SEPTEMBER. THE PALM BEACH COUNTY UM, PRESENTER HAD SOME VERY GOOD POINTS. ALL OF THE PRESENTERS HAD GOOD POINTS, BUT I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED AT THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, SPECIFICALLY, ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER BUSINESS THAT THEY TAKE CARE OF. THIS WEEK, I HAD THE PLEASURE OF MEETING WITH A CITIZEN THIS PAST WEEK. WHO IS VERY, VERY INTERESTED IN THE RIVER. VERY INTERESTED IN TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CITY STAYS ON A PATH TO UM, WORKED CONSISTENTLY TO DO WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO TO UM, LEAD THE FORCE TO CLEAN UP THE RIVER TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY TO WORK WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT AND TO DECIDE AGAIN AND I KNOW THAT WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS BEFORE . WITH REGARD TO WHETHER OR NOT THERE WOULD BE ANY LAWSUIT AGAINST ANYBODY, WHETHER IT'S AN ARMY CORPS OR ANYONE WHO MIGHT BE THERE, WHETHER THEY'RE HELPING OR HINDERING CLEANING UP THE RIVER, AND I KNOW THAT WE WORKED VERY HARD WITH THE CORE THE PAST FEW YEARS, ESPECIALLY WHEN COMMISSIONER UM MATHESON WAS ON THE. THE CITY COMMISSION , SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING THIS UP AS A AH, SOMETHING I DIDN'T PUT IT ON FOR THIS DISCUSSION FOR THIS TIME, BUT I'M GOING TO BE MEETING WITH THE CITY MANAGER AND SEE IF WE NEED TO ADD THIS TO A DISCUSSION AT SOME POINT TO UM, IF WE HAVE SOMEBODY WHO'S GOING TO VOLUNTEER AND BE ABLE TO SAY I WILL WORK AND WORK WITH THE CITY TO HELP MOVE SOMETHING FORWARD, I THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD THING AND I JUST WANTED TO LET EVERYBODY KNOW THAT I'M BE EXPLORING THIS SOME MORE. UM IT'S AH, SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN INVOLVED WITH THE COMMUNITY A LONG TIME AND IT'S A, UH, GOOD ADVOCATE, MR MAX DUCKY, AND HE REALLY WANTS TO WORK ON SOMETHING. HE PRESENTED ME WITH THE PRESENTATION AS TO HOW WE CAN TRY TO GET, UH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OFFICER AND I GUESS SAID, I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS WITH CITY MANAGER WITH MR WHOLE GUARD AND REALLY AND AGAIN, PROBABLY WITH MR STUCKEY TO SEE THIS IS A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE AND THEN SEE IF WE CAN COME BACK AND MAYBE HAVE A DND AND THERE'S SO, UM, MISTER, UM. CITY MANAGER WOULD PUT THAT ON HIS CALENDAR SO THAT HE CAN REMIND ME THAT WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS IT AND HAVE A DND. I'D APPRECIATE THAT. I HAVE TWO ORGANIZATION OF GREEK ORGANIZATION AND A TRADITIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN ORGANIZATION THAT HAVE ASKED PROCLAMATIONS. WE'VE HAD THEM THE FIRST, UM MEETING OF THE MONTH. THIS IS IN BETWEEN. THEY BOTH HAVE ACTIVITIES COMING UP IN STUART, WHICH WILL BRING IN PUBLIC OVER THREE OR 400 PERSONS WHO WILL BE TOURISTS IN OUR AREA, AND THEY WILL BE HERE FOR THEIR ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MEETING ALONG WITH THEIR MEMBERS, WHO ARE ALSO CHAPTERS WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY, AND I'M GOING TO ASK THE I'M GONNA ASK CITY MANAGER TO WORK. HELP ME COORDINATE WITH, OR, UH MAYOR TO SEE IF WE CAN FACILITATE A VERY SHORT, UM, WELCOME, MATION. JUST WELCOME THEM TO OUR CITY. ACTUALLY, I GOT THE SAME EMAIL FROM THIS LANDRY AND I ACTUALLY OFFERED TO EVEN GO TO THE EVENT. OKAY SORRY, LADIES. MR MCDONNELL OVER THIS. OKAY THANK YOU. SO YOU DEFINITELY WILL WILL WORK AGAIN WITH CITY MANAGER. THANK YOU FOR WORKING WITH US TO THE MANAGER.

I'M TRYING. OKAY. THANK YOU. UM I THINK I THINK THAT THAT'S ABOUT IT. I JUST WANT TO SEE AGAIN THE WORK OF THE TRAGICAL REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IS SO IMPORTANT, AND I KNOW THAT

[00:10:02]

EVERYBODY IS INTERESTED IN ZOOM AND THEY HAVE TO LOOK AT THE CITY MEETINGS TO CHECK WHAT'S GOING ON AT CITY HALL. CHECK WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL WATCH THEIR MEETINGS, WATCH WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING FOR THE ENTIRE AREA. WE HAVE PROBABLY OVER 30 SOMETHING MEMBERS WHO ARE THERE AS VOTING PERSONS FROM PALM BEACH, MARTIN INDIAN RIVER. HER SET, LUCY I THINK OKEECHOBEE COUNTY. EVERYBODY'S ON THEIR CITY. UM COMMISSIONERS. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WERE ALL ON THERE , AND IT'S A VERY EXCELLENT ORGANIZATION. SO PLEASE TAKE THAT AND PUT IT ON YOUR LIST TO SEE WHAT ORIGINAL PLANNING COUNCIL IS DOING IN OUR COMMUNITY TO HELP MOVE OR COMMUNITY FORWARD. THANK YOU. OKAY THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER CLARK. JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS ON MY LIST. ONE IS I WANT TO THANK ALL THE CITY EMPLOYEES OVER THE WEEKEND. WE'RE WORKING HARD TO PREPARE FOR THE CITY IN CASE WE HAD A HURRICANE HIT US.

I KNOW THEY'VE DONE A LOT OF GREAT WORK. I HAD A COUPLE CONVERSATIONS VIA EMAIL, TEXT AND VOICE WITH MIKE AND DAVE. REGARDING CASE WE NEED TO DO AN EMERGENCY DECLARATION. IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE DODGING THAT BULLET. FIVE O'CLOCK. WE'RE BACK IN A TROPICAL STORM WATCH. OKAY ANOTHER EASTERLY TURN, SO OKAY, WELL, WE'LL BE KEEPING AN EYE ON THAT. AND IF AND FOR COMMISSIONER RICH AND COMMISSIONER COLLINS. UM THE WE HAVE SOME PROCEDURES THAT WE PUT HAVE IN PLACE THAT IF WE DO HAVE A STORM THAT WE WOULD DECLARE AN EMERGENCY FOR THE PURPOSE OF, UH , GIVES THE CITY MANAGER MORE LATITUDE TO DEAL WITH THE STORM. UM AND SO, AND THAT'S DONE BY DECLARATION BY THE MAYOR SO WELL AND THEN YOU CURSE WOULD ALL BE NOTIFIED BY IT, BUT UM, WELL, WE'RE KEEPING THEIR KEEPING AN EYE ON THAT STAFF HAS BEEN FABULOUS. UM AND I ALSO AS MILTON HERE, MILTON. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I SAID. I SAID MILTON A TEXT OVER THE WEEKEND THAT THERE WAS A SIDEWALK THAT HAD A TREE BLOCKING KIND OF TREES BLOCKING IT. UH AND I WASN'T THINKING THAT BECAUSE OF THEIR HURRICANE PREP, I FIGURED IT WOULD GET DONE. NEXT WEEK OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, UM, THAT WAS LIKE EIGHT O'CLOCK ON SATURDAY MORNING. I SENT A TEXT . I THINK IT WAS BY 9 30. I HAD PICTURES OF THE OF THE TREE TRIMMED. UH SO I JUST WANT TO JUST SAY THANK YOU, MILTON AND THANK MORE IMPORTANTLY, I GUESS. THANK YOUR TEAM, BECAUSE YOU KNOW, WE ALL ARE ARE WHAT? BY THE PEOPLE OF SUPPORT US. SO THANK YOU. SO, PLEASE, THANK THEM. UM AS WE'RE COMING UP TO THE END OF THE YEAR WILL BE THINKING ABOUT OUR LEGISLATIVE AGENDAS. AND THIS ISN'T A DIRECT , UM CITY. ISSUE BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S AFFECTING OUR RESIDENTS. AND AS WE'RE LOOKING AT OUR AGENDA, LIKE TO LOOK AT THIS. I'VE BEEN TALKING TO SO MANY PEOPLE THAT OR HAVING DIFFICULTIES WITH THEIR HOMEOWNER'S INSURANCE. UM PEOPLE ARE GETTING I TALKED TO ONE INDIVIDUAL HERE LOCALLY. THAT'S BEEN CANCELED THREE TIMES IN THE LAST YEAR. I'VE TALKED TO PEOPLE . I TALKED TO TWO PEOPLE WHO ARE CONSIDERING MOVING OUT OF STATE BECAUSE OF THEY CAN'T GET INSURANCE BECAUSE THEY'RE HAVING TROUBLE WITH THEIR INSURANCE.

AND SO I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO ADD TO OUR LEGISLATIVE AGENDA, BECAUSE IF HOMEOWNERS CANNOT GET INSURANCE , YOU KNOW THAT'S SOMETHING THAT REALLY AFFECTS OUR RESIDENTS.

AND IT'S ALSO AFFECTING THEIR FINANCES BECAUSE INSURANCE IS GOING UP. I KNOW SO MANY PEOPLE THAT ARE ON CITIZENS NOW, AND CITIZENS REALLY SHOULD BE SUPPOSED TO BE THE LAST RESORT AND I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE DO GET A MAJOR HURRICANE THAT HITS US AND WE HAVE EVERYBODY ON CITIZENS. IS THE STATE PREPARED TO BILL EVERYBODY OUT. AND SO IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE DEFINITELY NEED TO ADDRESS. AND THEN FINALLY TOMORROW, UM, CHIEF TO MANALI FOR ME THAT TOMORROW WILL BE HAVING SWEARING IN A NEW POLICE OFFICER, SO I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO GOING OVER AND MEETING THE NEW OFFICER AND SEE THEM SWORN IN AND THEN FINALLY, I SEE SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER ANDERSON IS HERE. AND JUST WANT TO THANK HIM FOR HIS SERVICE AND THANK HIM FOR BEING HERE THIS EVENING. THANK YOU. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY AND I GUESS WE

[COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER]

MOVE ON TO, UM, LET'S SEE COMMISSIONED COMMENTS BY THE MANAGER. I JUST WANT TO REPORT THAT WE DID RECEIVE THE $125,000 FINE GRANT FOR OUR DOCKS DESIGNED AND PERMITTING PROCESS.

THAT PIECE IS TO TAKE THE CURRENT FLOATING DOCKS AND MAKE THEM INTO FIXED DOCKS. SO WE'RE HAPPY TO RECEIVE THAT FUNDING. IT JUST WOULD HAVE COME BEFORE THE STORM, THEN. NICER BUT ANYWAYS. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. OKAY CAN WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AGENDA?

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]

ADD IN THE ADDING THE FINAL ITEM. YES AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CLARK. YES OKAY.

[COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (3 Minutes Max.)]

ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES? OKAY WE HAVE COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC, BUT I

[00:15:03]

THINK THAT MANY OF THESE ARE PROBABLY FOR THAT LAST ITEM. PARDON? JOY. THAT YOU SHOULD TAKE THE COMMENTS NOW, REGARDLESS BECAUSE YOU SHOULD MAKE PEOPLE WAIT UNLESS YOU GUYS WANT TO AGENDA MOVIE AGENDA. THAT'S WHY, YEAH, LET'S DO THAT. LET'S JUST TAKE THE COMMENTS NOW. SHERIFF FISHER THANK YOU, SHERIFF. AND IF I REMIND EVERYBODY HAVE THREE MINUTES, SO WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT WHEN I STEP UP YOUR FIRST? I'M SURE FISHER. I LIVE AT 45 13 SOUTHEAST BRIDGE DOWN COURT, AND I DO WORK IN THE CITY OF STEWART. I'M HERE TO ADDRESS THE TOPIC OF WORKFORCE AFFORDABILITY , AFFORDABLE HOUSING, HOMELESSNESS, AND STEWART IS NOW CREEPING INTO MIDDLE CLASS. MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS ARE TOO EMBARRASSED TO STEP UP AND SPEAK ON THAT TOPIC, SO I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON THEIR BEHALF, WAGES AND OUR COMMUNITY FOR THE LOWER MIDDLE CLASS DO NOT SUPPORT RENTALS IN OUR CITY. I SUGGEST, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, THAT YOU ALL RECOGNIZE THE LOWER MIDDLE CLASS MIDDLE CLASS, NOT JUST THE WEALTHY WHEN WE TALK ABOUT WORKFORCE SUPPORTABLE HOUSING. OUR CITIZENS NEED HOUSING THAT IS OBTAINABLE FOR THOSE MAKING THE LOWER WAGES OR JUST SLIGHTLY ABOVE MINIMUM WAGE. WE HOPE THAT THE CITY WILL RECONSIDER USING THE PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF GEORGIA AND MARTIN LUTHER KING FOR WORKFORCE. AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THANK YOU. OKAY THANK YOU. AND I MADE A MISTAKE AND I SKIPPED AHEAD TO PUBLIC COMMENT AND A FEW OTHER THINGS AHEAD OF A PRESENTATION. BUT I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND TAKE THE REST OF PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE I GO BACK TO THE PRESENTATION. UM SINCE WE'VE ALREADY STARTED THEN, AND I APOLOGIZE FOR TWO, UH, STAFF AND EVERYONE FOR SKIPPING THAT INTO THE COMMISSION, SO NEXT IS CHERIE RAMIREZ. HELLO AND THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. MY NAME IS SHERRY RAMIREZ. I'M AT 30 TO 60, SOUTHWEST CORNELL. I AM A WORKING PROFESSIONAL WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF STEWART AND I HAVE BEEN IN MARTIN COUNTY RESIDENT FOR 13 YEARS OF THOSE 13 YEARS, I HAVE BEEN A SINGLE MOM FOR 11. I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CLIMB THE CORPORATE LADDER AND I CURRENTLY HOLD A MANAGEMENT POSITION. I'M AN AVID VOLUNTEER , AND I FELT I'M RESPECTED IN THE COMMUNITY. WHEN I FIRST BECAME A SINGLE MOM, I HAD TO WORK 3 TO 4 JOBS THE FIRST TWO YEARS TO KEEP A ROOF OVER MY HEAD AND FOOD ON THE TABLE. I ONLY MADE 20 K. I HAVE LIVED IN POVERTY. AND IF I WERE IN THE SAME SITUATION NOW I WANT TO BE ABLE TO LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY THAT I LOVE AND I GIVE BACK TO I'D BE FORCED TO MOVE AND I'M ALMOST AT THAT POINT. MHM RIGHT NOW. AND MY CURRENT POSITION. I MAKE A FAIR WAGE. PRIOR TO THE COST OF LIVING GOING UP. I FELT SECURE IN MY FINANCES. I WAS STARTING TO SAVE PAYING DOWN DEBT, AND IT WAS ONLY WORKING ONE JOB. THEN APRIL OF THIS YEAR, I STARTED TO SEE A CHANGE. I HAD TO START A SECOND JOB AGAIN. TELL ME COVER THE COST OF INFLATION. RENT ELECTRIC GAS. I'M NOT THE ONLY PROFESSIONAL WHO HAS EXPERIENCED A SQUEEZE OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS OR FOR SOME LONGER THE MIDDLE CLASS IS BEING PUSHED BACK INTO POVERTY. MY RENT WAS RAISED $500 IN APRIL AND I WAS ABLE AND I WAS ALLOWED TO PAY THE ADDITIONAL RENT WITH MY SECOND PAYCHECK EACH MONTH PAID MORE IN RENT THAN HE MADE IN ONE PAYCHECK. MY BROTHER WAS STAYING WITH ME AT THIS TIME. AND THEN WHEN HE MOVED OUT A FEW WEEKS AGO, I WAS FACED WITH THE FACT THAT I REALLY COULDN'T AFFORD WHERE I WAS LIVING, AND I HAD BEEN LIVING FOR FOUR YEARS. THE COST OF LIVING WITH TOO MUCH, AND I FIND MYSELF THAT I'M IN DEBT AGAIN WITH MAXED OUT CREDIT CARDS AND LOANS. THERE'S SO MANY PEOPLE FACING THE SAME ISSUES. I HEAR ABOUT IT THROUGH MY CHURCH, WHICH IS ALSO WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, AND I HEAR ABOUT IT THROUGH THE WORK THAT I DO AND THE NON PROFITS THAT I WORK WITH WHEN LOOKING INTO AFFORDABLE OPTIONS. I SOON REALIZED THERE WERE NONE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX IN THE CITY OF STEWART THAT I RENTED FROM 24 YEARS AGO. IT WAS A 22 BEDROOM, TWO BATH. I WAS ONLY 16 80 AT THE TIME. AND NOW IN THAT SAME COMPLEX, IT'S $1800 FOR 11. I WAS BLESSED TO HAVE A FRIEND OFFERED ME TWO ROOMS AT THEIR HOUSE TO RENT. THAT'S WHAT MANY PEOPLE ARE BEING FORCED TO DO RIGHT NOW IS COHABITATION. WHEN I TOLD MY LANDLORD'S I WAS MOVING, THEY WERE KIND ENOUGH TO GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL RENT THAT I HAD BEEN PAYING PRIOR TO THE $500 INCREASE. WHEN I WAS 19 YEARS OLD. I HAD TO LIVE IN MY CAR AND TAKE SHOWERS THAT ARE FLYING J FOR A WEEK UNTIL I BECAME A COUCH SURFER. HOUSE TO HOUSE PEOPLE WHO AREN'T COUNTY ARE BEING FORCED INTO THE SAME SITUATION. OUR HOTELS OR HOTELS OR NEEDING ASSISTANCE. SALVATION ARMY'S COMPARE COMPASSION HOUSE

[00:20:06]

HAS A WAITING LIST AND IS THAT CAPACITY BACK. THANK YOU. SORRY UM, WE NEED TO CHANGE. WE NEED PLANS. PLEASE RECONSIDER USING THE PROPERTY FOR WORKFORCE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. AND IF I MISPRONOUNCE YOUR LAST NAME, I APOLOGIZE. WAR A G. G O BILLY. CLOSE COURSE.

HOW IS THE CORRECT PRONUNCIATION ? GOV OKAY, THANK YOU. OKAY GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. AND THANK YOU. MY NAME IS LAURA JOBE AND I LIVE AT 29 50 SOUTHEAST OCEAN BOULEVARD. EXCUSE ME. I HAVE A SORE THROAT. STEWART IS A TOWN COMMUNITY BUT SOMEHOW OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS, OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS HAVE BECOME THE VOICE OF GROWTH ON STEROIDS AND MAY HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT IT'S LIKE TO LIVE IN THIS COMMUNITY GROWTH IS GOOD, AND IT'S NEEDED FOR ANY TOWN TO SURVIVE. BUT WHEN YOU SACRIFICE GROWTH BEFORE IMPROVEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS VERY POOR PLANNING. WHEN THE TOWN OFFICIALS PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WHICH I MIGHT ADD. YOU HAVE FOR YEARS, UM. AND NOW THE NEW TERMINOLOGY IS ACCESSIBLE HOUSING. IT'S ACCESSIBLE FOR WHO THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD 2000 TO 3000 MONTH RENT FOR TWO BEDROOM APARTMENTS, ZONING CHANGES AND LAND USE CHANGES DISREGARD FOR OUR WETLANDS, ALL IN THE NAME OF ANOTHER STRIP MALL ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE OR ANOTHER MULTIMILLION DOLLAR COMMUNITY. THIS APPEARS TO BE THE DIRECTION OUR TOWN CONTINUES TO GROW IN, AND I BEG TO ASK THE QUESTION. WHY WE NEED TO BE PROMOTING OUR SMALL TOWN BUSINESSES ARE SMALL TOWN PRESENCE GROWTH THAT WILL BENEFIT THE RESIDENTS OF STEWART , NOT THE OUT OF TOWN DEVELOPERS WHO WILL RAPE OUR LAND AND THEN ONCE AND WERE NO LONGER VIABLE.

THEY'LL JUST MOVE ON TO THE NEXT TOWN IN QUEST OF THE ALMIGHTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH IN THEORY DESTROYS TOWNS AND THEIR UNIQUE INDIVIDUALITY, WHICH IS WHAT STEWART HAD. OUR TOWN IS PROMOTED AND ALL THE COASTAL MAGAZINES AND ARTICLES DESIGNATED TO SHOWCASE SHOWCASE THE BEST OF UNKNOWN SMALL TOWNS TO VISIT AND MOVE TO. WELL, THIS IS GREAT FOR MARKETING. IN THE END, THOSE ARTICLES WILL BE PROMOTING AN IMAGE OF A TOWN THAT NO LONGER EXIST. I THINK OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE CONSTITUENTS THAT YOU REPRESENT.

WE MANAGED TO GAIN A SEAT ON THE COMMISSION. THERE WILL BE MORE SEATS AVAILABLE IN THE NEXT ELECTION. I JUST ASKED. WHAT DO YOU WANT YOUR LEGACY TO BE? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND BEFORE I MOVE ON THE NEXT ONE, I SEE THAT NEW SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER AMY PRITCHARD IS NEAR WELCOME TODAY.

OKAY NEXT, UH, PERSON IS QUINN ISHA. NIKKI HAWKINS. I HOPE I PRONOUNCED YOUR NAME CORRECTIVE.

HELLO COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS NIKKI HAWKINS. UM SORRY. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? ALL RIGHT. UM I AM AT 14 14. ARAPAHOE UM, I AM A REAL ESTATE, UM, REALTOR RIGHT NOW AND SOON TO BE DEVELOPER. UM THERE IS A NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THE COMMUNITY. I HAVE TO TELL MY CLIENTS WHEN THEY COME TO ME THAT YOU CAN'T EVEN THINK ABOUT LIVING IN MARTIN COUNTY BECAUSE FIRST OF ALL THE RENT IS TOO EXPENSIVE. THE HOUSING IS WAY TOO EXPENSIVE AND THE PEOPLE THAT I SERVE THE MIDDLE CLASS AND LOWER MIDDLE CLASS. THEY JUST CANNOT AFFORD THAT. SO I TAKE THEM SUPPORT ST LUCIE AND EVEN THAT IS GETTING OUT OF WAY. SO I JUST WANT TO ENCOURAGE YOU GUYS TO MAYBE, UM , HIRED A FACILITATOR TO FACILITATE SOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING WILL BE WILLING TO DO IT , UM, SO THAT WE CAN GET IT GOING AND GET IT STARTED RIGHT AND COME UP WITH A VIABLE SOLUTION FOR THE COMMUNITY SO THAT PEOPLE CAN LIVE AND WORK WITHIN THE COMMUNITY HERE IN MARTIN COUNTY AND STEWART SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKAY ROBERT NEARY IS NEXT. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. ROBERT MARY I'M A CITY OF STEWART RESIDENT AND ALSO CEO FOR HOUSE OF HOPE. HERE ALSO TO SPEAK ABOUT THE ISSUE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE CITY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO RECONSIDER THE DISCUSSIONS FROM YOUR PREVIOUS MEETING. UM WELL, WE'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW. IN REAL TIME AT HOUSE OF HOPE IS AND YOU'VE HEARD IT FROM SOME OF THE SPEAKERS ALREADY, FOLKS CAN AFFORD TO BE HERE ANYMORE. SO WE'VE ALREADY BEEN CHALLENGED, FEELING A LOT OF OPEN POSITIONS IN OUR COMMUNITY. I CAN TELL YOU THAT WE'VE SEEN, UM TRIPLE TRIPLE FIGURES OF FAMILIES THAT HAVE BEEN FORCED TO RELOCATE INTO THE CENTER OF THE STATE WHERE THINGS ARE STILL A LITTLE BIT LESS EXPENSIVE. SO WE'RE LOSING IMPORTANT WORKFORCE FOR THE SUCCESS OF OUR BUSINESS COMMUNITY IN MARTIN COUNTY AND WITHIN THE CITY OF STEWART. UM THE LOCATION THAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED. BEING AN IDEAL SITUATION IF YOU'RE GOING THROUGH THE CHECKLIST OF SPACES WHERE AFFORDABLE HOUSING WOULD BE A SUCCESSFUL USE, IT'S

[00:25:03]

WALKABLE FOR MEDICAL. IT'S WALKABLE FOR JOBS SERVICES. IT'S WITHIN A COMMUNITY THAT WOULD THAT ALREADY IS GEARED TOWARDS AFFORDABILITY FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT LIVE THERE, AND HE'S STEWART. SO IT CHECKS A LOT OF BOXES. WE GET A LOT OF POINTS CERTAINLY BE HELPFUL CHICKEN OUT GRANT FUNDING BECAUSE OF THAT. SO UM, I WOULD URGE YOU GUYS TO CERTAINLY RECONSIDER YOUR PREVIOUS DISCUSSION AND HOW THAT LAND WOULD BE USED IN THE FUTURE, BUT ALSO URGED YOU TO, UM, CREATE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A LARGER DISCUSSION AROUND TRUE, AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND EVERYONE'S THROWING AROUND DIFFERENT WORDS. NOW ITS WORKFORCE. IT'S ATTAINABLE.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS WHAT WE NEED FOR OUR LOWER WAGE EARNERS IN THIS COMMUNITY TO BE ABLE TO LIVE WORK, PLAY AND PRAY HERE IN MARTIN COUNTY, AND THE CITY HAS CERTAINLY OPPORTUNITIES TO HELP US TO CREATE THAT IT'LL NEVER WORK IF IT'S JUST NON PROFITS OR JUST PRIVATE ENTERPRISE. UM EVERYWHERE WHERE THIS IS SUCCESSFUL. IT'S GREAT COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS, PUBLIC PRIVATE SECTOR, THE GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED, AS WELL AS BUSINESSES AND NONPROFIT ENTITIES TO MAKE THINGS HAPPEN. SO UM, THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING I HOPE THAT YOU ALL WOULD CONSIDER ON A BIGGER PICTURE BEYOND JUSTICE. ONE PARCEL THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, ROB. THANK YOU. EVERYTHING YOUR ORGANIZATION DOES HAVE SOME HOPE. THANK YOU FOR WHAT HOUSE? I HOPE DOES JIMMY SMITH JIMMY. CATCH YOU SLEEPING BACK THERE, JIMMY. LEADERS IN GENERAL. THANK YOU, JIMMY. PRESIDENT NW CP. FIRST OF ALL I WANNA THANK YOU ALL FOR PARTICIPATING IN THAT THEIR BARBECUE COOK OFF AND WE HAD AND THE CITY OF STEWART. AND I WILL. CITY MANAGER. GREAT JOB . Y'ALL GIVE HIM A ROUND APPLAUSE WAS ROBBED. I WON FIRST PLACE. DID A GOOD JOB. EVERYBODY IS WILLING TO LOOK FOR IT TO BE A HAND YOU AND WE ALL CAN PARTICIPATE AND ALSO WANT TO INVITE YOU ALL OUT TO THE MIRACLE AND HISTORY THIS YEAR GOING TO BE THE GREATEST EVENT WHERE EVERYBODY CAN COME TOGETHER. ALL RIGHT, LOOK FORWARD FOR THAT. IN DECEMBER. I'M JUST LISTENING TO THE YOUNG LADY. WOW CONVERSATION ABOUT WORK GOING MILLER CLASS, AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY OVER THERE, WHICH I WANT TO JUST GIVE YOU A LITTLE HISTORY ABOUT THAT LITTLE PIECE OF PROPERTY OVER THE GEORGIA AND MARLENE KING THAT HE WAS A HISTORIC PIECE OF PROPERTY THERE. HERE'S A BUILDING CYSTS ON THE CORNER. DALE GEORGIA IN MARCH LUTHER KING, EVEN THOUGH WE UTILIZE THAT PROPERTY FOR THE FUTURE LOWER INCOME HOUSING THAT BILL IN THERE. YES. SO IMPORTANT TO ME AND A LOT MORE 1974 75 76 YEAR OF MARTIN COUNTY. WE BUILT THAT BUILDING. WE BUILT THAT BUILDING FOR MY FATHER WAS HE WAS, UH, SUPERVISOR, SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AMONG COUNTY WHERE HE WAS THE FIRST ONE DESIGN EVERY BUS ROUTE EVERY STOP WHEREVER KID NEED TO BE PICKED UP IN WHAT CHINESE WOULD BE PICKED UP. THAT WAS HIS FIRST OFFICE THAT WE BUILT AS KIDS FROM MONTANA. AND I'VE BEEN WORKING TO SEE IF WE CAN KEEP THAT BUILDING SOMEWHERE FORM OF BEING A HISTORICAL IN THE USE OF THAT PROPERTY. I THINK I GOT SOME COMMENTS FROM SOMEONE SAID, WELL, THAT'S GREAT IDEA. WE CAN UTILIZE THEM COMMUNITY FOR SOMETHING ELSE, AND YOU CAN STILL BUILD HIS STORE ABILITY.

SO I WANT TO SAY THAT BECAUSE IT'S A LOT OF PEOPLE FROM MIND KIND OF HELPED BUILD THAT. I MEAN, OUR CARPENTER CLASS. I'LL LET YOU GO. NUTRITION CLASS I WAS IN THE STUCCO AND BLOCK CLASS MISSIONARY SO SOONER THAT IN OUR PLAY IN THE FUTURE, I THINK ANYTHING DOING WITH LOCAL INCOME HOUSING LOOKING HERE AND I WAS SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, MIDDLE CLASS NOW YOU HAVE TO BE A MILLIONAIRE. UH MILLER CLASS LIKE IT USED TO BE AS POOR PEOPLE NOW. POOR PEOPLE'S HOMELESS. AND THEN HOMELESS. I THINK THEY'RE JUST FORGOTTEN. SO WE HAVE TO LOOK AT A LOT OF THINGS. I THINK WE GOT ONE OF THE GREATEST CITIES REVEALS. AND I THINK WE GOT A GOOD SHOT OF SMART PEOPLE THAT SITS UP HERE. AND ALL YOU GOT A GOOD HEART. AND I KNOW YOU CAN COME TO A WAY WE CAN GET THIS DONE. I GOT WE GOT A LOT OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS IN MIND COUNTY. I CAN'T MIND COUNTY DEALING WITH ALL THE BRANCHES OVER THE STATE OF FLORIDA CREATE MINE. CANADA HAS THE BEST RESOURCE FOR HOMELESS FEEDING NOBODY IN MIND. CANADA SHOULD BE HUNGRY.

EVERYBODY GOT SOMETHING TO GIVE SOMEBODY MIND CANDY. BUT NOT WE JUST GOT TO MOVE IT TO ANOTHER LEVEL, NOT JUST FOOD. WE HAVE TO FIND WAYS TO HELP THESE PEOPLE BE ABLE TO STAY IN MIND AND MY KIDS DON'T WANT TO COME BACK. I DON'T REALLY WANT HIM TO COME BACK ACHED GOOD PLACE TO LIVE.

IT'S VERY COMFORTABLE. WE ALL KNOW THAT. EVEN THOUGH SOME OF YOU ALL KNOW IT'S TOUGH SO WE CAN SIT DOWN. UNLESS WE CAN DO IT. WE'RE GOING TO PROVE TO THE WORLD THAT WE CAN DO IT TOGETHER

[00:30:03]

AND LET'S STAND TOGETHER. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, JIMMY. UH, SUSIE HUTCHINSON. THANK YOU, SUSIE. GOOD EVENING, AND WELCOME TO YOU TO NEW FOLKS WERE THRILLED TO HAVE YOU, UM I LIVE IN POPE CITY, 37 48, SOUTHWEST SUNSET TRACE CIRCLES AND I WORK IN JENSEN BEACH. SO YOU'RE WONDERING WHY AM I HERE? WELL STEWART'S RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE AND I'VE LIVED HERE SINCE 1974 AND ABSOLUTELY LOVES STEWART. UM I RECENTLY HAD A BIRTHDAY. I DIDN'T GET GIFTS FROM ANY OF YOU , BUT IT'S OKAY. AND I DIDN'T HAVE A BIRTHDAY AND I STARTED THINKING THAT ONE OF THE BEST THINGS ABOUT GETTING OLDER WAS THAT I BOUGHT MY PLACE IN 1995.

SO IN 1995. WHILE IT WAS STILL A LITTLE EXPENSIVE. I CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE HERE. I RUN AN ORGANIZATION CALLED HELPING PEOPLE SUCCEED WE HAVE ABOUT 145 STAFF, NOW WITH NEW DOLLARS WE'VE RECEIVED WILL PROBABLY HAVE CLOSE TO 170 BY THE END OF THE YEAR. WE ARE HAVING SUCH A HARD TIME. FINDING STAFF AND WE PAY IN THE MIDDLE. WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT STARTED 15. AND THEN WE'VE GOT SOME, YOU KNOW, HIGHER PAYING POSITIONS, BUT PEOPLE ARE HAVING MORE AND MORE TROUBLE FINDING A PLACE TO LIVE. OR BEING ABLE TO STAY WHERE THEY LIVE. I WAS TALKING TO ONE OF OUR STAFF MEMBERS WHO LIKE, UM WAS SAID EARLIER HAD HER RENT GO UP ABOUT $700 A MONTH. FROM AROUND 800. SO IT'S REALLY, REALLY, UM CRAZY AND DIFFICULT. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE CITY OF STEWART TAKE THE LEAD WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING BECAUSE EVERYBODY'S TALKING ABOUT IT FOR YEARS. WE'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE TALKING ABOUT IT. IT WOULD REALLY BE GOOD TO SEE THE CITY OF STEWART. TAKE THE LEAD. LOOK AT THAT PROPERTY LOOK SERIOUSLY AT THE HOUSING THAT YOU CAN DO.

FOR THE CITIZENS OF STEWART AND THE ENTIRE COUNTY AND I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU TO GET IT DONE. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SUSIE. UH, VALERIE SLACK. HI MY NAME IS VALERIE SLACK. AND WHILE NOT CURRENTLY A MARTIN COUNTY RESIDENT, I DID GO TO HIGH SCHOOL HERE AND LIVED HERE. WE'RE ABOUT 10 YEARS BACK IN THE EIGHTIES AND EARLY NINETIES, I DO APPRECIATE STEWART AND MARTIN COUNTY. DESIGN. THAT I CAN'T CONTROL. ALL RIGHT, I'LL SPEAK UP. I UM I REPRESENT ARCHITECTS LOCALLY. I AM THE PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS TREASURE COAST CHAPTER. I ALSO SIT ON THE ST LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. AND I AM VERY AWARE OF OUR AFFORDABLE HOUSING CRISIS . IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE ARE ALL DEALING WITH, UP AND DOWN THE TREASURE COAST AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY, BUT PARTICULARLY HERE IN FLORIDA PLACE THAT IS SO DESIRABLE THAT PRICES HAVE SKYROCKETED AS WE ALL KNOW. WE HAVE A DEEP NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. UM. AT THE SAME TIME. I KNOW WE'VE ALL BEEN THROUGH COVID TOGETHER, WRITTEN IT OUT AND GAINED A HUGE APPRECIATION FOR ALL OF OUR FIRST LINE WORKERS ARE HOSPITAL WORKERS ARE FIRST RESPONDERS. ALL OF THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE SO KEY AND WHOSE POSITIONS WERE TRYING TO FILL AND STRUGGLING TO DO SO. SAME GOES FOR TEACHERS. UM, WE HAVE THIS TREMENDOUS OPPORTUNITY WITH THE SMALL PARCEL RIGHT HERE IN THE CITY OF STEWART TO PROVIDE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR FOLKS WHO CANNOT AFFORD IT, AND PARTICULARLY FOR THE FOLKS IN THOSE PARTICULAR LINES OF WORK. WHO WOULD BE ABLE TO USE THIS HOUSING AND WALK TO WORK HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES. POLICE OFFICERS, FIREFIGHTERS, TEACHERS , ALL OF THEM WOULD BE WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE TO JOBS FROM THIS PARTICULAR SITE. WORRIED ABOUT GROWTH. I'D SAY THIS WOULD ACTUALLY REDUCE TRAFFIC YOU'D BE BRINGING IN THE SOLUTION TO PROBLEMS COULD HAVE PEOPLE WALKING TO WORK. IT WOULD REDUCE TRAFFIC IN DOWNTOWN IT WOULD HAVE FEET ON THE STREET FOR LOCAL BUSINESS. IT WOULD INCREASE PEOPLE VISITING THOSE BUSINESSES WHILE DECREASING THE PARKING CRUNCH. IT'S GOOD FOR THE BOTTOM LINE FOR EVERYONE. I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RECONSIDER THIS MEASURE AND LOOK AT THIS SITE WHERE YOU COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE DEPENDING ON WHAT YOUR ZONING IS. YOU CAN HAVE 30 60 DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF UNITS ON THIS SITE, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE DENSITY IS THAT'S AGREED UPON FOR IT. YOU'VE GOT OVER 3.5 OF YOU ALMOST 3.5 ACRES AND IT'S JUST A TERRIFIC SITE. YOU COULD DO SO MUCH GOOD WITH SO LITTLE MONEY FOR SO MANY PEOPLE. I

[00:35:01]

STRONGLY URGE YOU TO RECONSIDER THIS ITEM AND PUT THESE FOLKS IN SAFE, WALKABLE HOUSING. THANK YOU, TONY ANDERSON. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. TONY ANDERSON, LEAVE THAT 45 30, SOUTHEAST GERALDINE STREET IN STUART, FLORIDA, ALSO KNOWN AS PORT SALERNO, LIFETIME RESIDENT HERE , AND FIRST OF ALL, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU GUYS FOR YOUR SERVICE. THE FACT THAT YOU DECIDE TO SPEND SOME TIME IN PUBLIC SERVICE THAT IS NOT AN EASY JOB, ESPECIALLY IF YOU WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING. SO GOD BE WITH YOU, OKAY? UM THIS ISSUE OF AFFORDABILITY. HAS BEEN A PROBLEM FOR A LONG TIME. BACK IN THE NINETIES. I SERVED ON THE L P A. OKAY FOR FOUR YEARS, THE COUNTY AND, UH, I PUSHED FOR THAT. EVEN THEN. AFFORDABILITY WAS A PROBLEM HERE. OBVIOUSLY THE PRICES WERE NOT WHAT THEY ARE NOW, BUT IN PROPORTION IF YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING, IT WAS STILL A PROBLEM. BUT YOU KNOW HOW THEY ADDRESSED IT ALL. LET THEM GO TO PORT ST LUCIE. AND THAT'S WHAT THEY DID. AND I THOUGHT, HOW SAD IS THAT? SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT YOU CAN COME HERE AND WORK? DO IT. DO THESE JOBS. YOU KNOW THE SERVICE INDUSTRY OR WHATEVER. BUT WHEN NIGHT COME GO SOMEWHERE ELSE, AND WE'LL SEE YOU IN THE MORNING. I THINK THAT EVERY COMMUNITY SHOULD BE FITTED. WELL IT REPRESENTS ESPECIALLY PEOPLE THAT ARE WORKING. I MEAN, PEOPLE THAT ARE WORKING HARD. YOU HEARD THE STORY OF THE LADY A WHILE AGO. AND THERE ARE A LOT OF STORIES LIKE THAT, AND THAT THAT IS REALLY, REALLY SAD. WE REALLY NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT NOW, BECAUSE IT'S NOT JUST A PROBLEM. IT'S AN EPIDEMIC. AND SHAME ON US HERE. MARTIN COUNTY, WE CAN DO BETTER. BUT IT'S A MATTER OF PRIORITY. I THINK THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY IS AN IDEA.

SPOT TO AT LEAST START WITH YOU CAN BE A MODEL AND THERE ARE OTHER THINGS. IT'S GOT TO START SOMEWHERE, AND YOU GUYS CAN DO IT, AND I THINK YOU CAN DO IT AND STILL RESPECT WHATEVER THE HISTORICAL, UH, PART OF THAT IS YOU CAN ALL GO HABITAT, BUT IT'S A MATTER IF YOU WANT TO DO IT.

SO I ASK YOU TO PLEASE THINK ABOUT THE COMMON GOOD. I MEAN, THERE'S SO MANY OF US, WE DON'T WE'RE NOT EVEN AWARE OF IT, BECAUSE WE DON'T WE IT DOESN'T AFFECT US, BUT JUST BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T KNOW JUST BECAUSE IT DOESN'T AFFECT YOU DOESN'T MEAN IT'S NOT HAPPENING. SO, GUYS, PLEASE HAVE A CONSCIENCE AND YOU KNOW THE COMMON GOOD. OKAY THANK YOU. THANK YOU. NICK ONE.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. I'M NICK BLANC A LONG TIME. STUART RESIDENT 48 YEARS. ALSO CHAIR THE BOARD CHAIR FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS COUNCIL HERE IN MARTIN COUNTY AND MEMBER OF MARTIN COUNTY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE. UM COMMISSIONER CLARK MENTIONED TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LAST WEEK DISCUSSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING I WAS ABLE TO REPRESENT MARTIN COUNTY AT THAT MEETING AND ENCOURAGE YOU TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT WHAT SOME OF THE OTHER SURROUNDING COUNTIES ARE DOING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING , AND I THINK YOU'LL BE PLEASED AND AMAZED AT WHAT ALL IS TAKING PLACE AROUND US, AND WE NEED TO GET ON BOARD AND CATCH UP WITH THOSE COUNTIES IN THAT EFFORT. IN REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY THAT'S ON MARTIN LUTHER KING. I WAS JUST MADE AWARE OF SOME OF THE DISCUSSION THAT'S BEEN GOING ON REGARDING THAT. BUT I, UH IT'S CERTAINLY MEET SOME OF THE MAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEEDS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AS FAR AS LOCATION IS CONCERNED, AND THAT'S IT. IT'S CLOSE TO SCHOOLS. IT'S CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED NEW BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB . IT'S CLOSE TO MEDICAL FACILITIES CLOSE TO TRANSPORTATION, AND IT MEETS THAT CRITERIA. I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THE CITY CONSIDERING LOOKING AT ANY PROPERTY THAT'S AVAILABLE WITHIN THE CITY THAT COULD BE USED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. I KNOW WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS MANY TIMES. WE JUST NEED TO STEP IT UP TO THE NEXT LEVEL AND MAKE IT HAPPEN. THANKS THANK YOU, NICK. AND BY THE WAY, CONGRATULATIONS TO YOUR TENNESSEE MOLES. WAS IT TENNESSEE. THEY HAD A BIG WIN ON SATURDAY. SADLY HMM. GAIL, GOLDIE, PLEASE. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. I JUST HAVE TO GET MY ADDRESS. IS THAT WHAT I HAVE TO OK 1153, NORTHWEST 12TH TERRORISTS AND STUART. I JUST WANTED TO BRING TO LIGHT THAT I LOOK AT THIS FROM A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE. WE CERTAINLY DO NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND MY QUESTION TO THE COMMISSION IS, UH, YOU KNOW, HAVE YOU LOOKED BACK THAT MOST OF THESE

[00:40:04]

APARTMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT WERE BUILT BY OUTSIDE DEVELOPERS AND THE PRICES THAT THEY'RE CHARGING ARE NOT AFFORDABLE. WE ALL KNOW THAT. UM BUT MY PERSPECTIVE IS THAT ALL OF THESE APARTMENTS OR MANY OF THESE APARTMENTS? WERE APPROVED AND PUT BEFORE THE COMMISSIONERS BY THE LP, A LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY. IT ALL GOES BEFORE THEM AND THEN IT'S BROUGHT TO THE COMMISSION. SO MY QUESTION IS. WITH THE COMMISSIONERS, AND I KNOW MANY OF YOU SIT AND TALK ABOUT ALL OF THIS. LOOK AT THIS . YOU KNOW, THE AMERICAN DREAM IS TO OWN A HOME. THESE ARE APARTMENTS YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. APARTMENTS THIS IS NOT HOME OWNERSHIP. SO THIS IS JUST A TEMPORARY FIX. IT'S JUST A PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO BE LIVING UNTIL THEY CAN AFFORD A HOME THAT THEY CAN BUY, WHICH IS GOING TO BE TOTALLY OUT OF REACH. BECAUSE WE HAVE NO BUILDERS BUILDING HOMES HERE THAT ARE AFFORDABLE. THAT'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING WHEN YOU HAVE A YOUNG COUPLE THAT HAS A BABY OR A CHILD OR TWO, AND THEY CAN MOVE INTO THEIR DREAM HOME. OF OWNERSHIP. SO UM, I WOULD LIKE TO AGAIN ASK THE COMMISSIONERS AND I KNOW MANY OF YOU SIT ON THE L P A. AND THERE'S OTHER BOARDS THAT DO ALL OF THIS, UM, LOOKING AT THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING APARTMENTS ARE NOT AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THERE A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE TO BE UNTIL THEY CAN MOVE TO THEIR HOME THAT THEY WANT. SO WE'RE HAVING ALL OF THESE DEVELOPERS BUILD THESE APARTMENTS THAT ARE NOT AFFORDABLE. THEY'RE NOT AFFORDABLE AND FOR THE CITY TO GET INTO THE BUSINESS OF BEING LANDLORDS IS REALLY REALLY A STRETCH FOR ME. I DON'T THINK THAT THE CITY BELONGS IN THE BUSINESS OF BEING A LANDLORD. THANK YOU. OKAY NEXT, NICK YVETTE. I HOPE I PRESS YOUR NAME CORRECTLY, NICK. MOST PEOPLE IN MARTIN COUNTY RECOGNIZED. UM THAT WE HAVE PLENTY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. CALLED FORTUNATE LUCY. AND IT'S ELEMENTARY ECONOMICS.

ACKNOWLEDGE THAT LAND COSTS CONTRIBUTES TO THE OVERALL AFFORDABILITY. WELL STUART THAT SMALL SEASIDE COMMUNITY THAT COMMAND HIGHER EXPENSES. THE DELTA OF LAND COST. IMPORTANT LUCY CAN GO DIRECTLY TO IMPROVE AMENITIES AND HALF OF HOUSING. HIGHER LAND VALUE ONLY RESULT IN COMPROMISE QUALITY. MATERIALS AND SMALLER ACCOMMODATIONS. SWIMMING AGAINST THE CURRENT OF ECONOMICS IS FOOLISH AND COSTLY. AND CONTRADICTS AFFORDABILITY. UM. I ALSO WANT TO RECOGNIZE THE IRONY OF ALRIGHT. NEW COMMISSIONERS RUNNING ON NO DEVELOPMENT. AND THEN THE VERY FIRST THING. DONE IS PRESENTING THE DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. KATHLEEN POMMERY, IS THAT CORRECT? CAITLIN? I'M SORRY. HATE LYNN PALMERI. I LIVE IN GOLDEN GATE, ACTUALLY, UM AND I SERVED ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND I JUST HAD A QUESTION ABOUT YOU KNOW, I TOO HEARD A LOT FROM THE COMMISSION. I ALSO, UH, WORK PLAY AND PRAY AND STEWART LOTS OF ACTIVITIES THERE THAT I, YOU KNOW. ENTER INTO ECONOMICALLY AND ANOTHER WAYS. LOTS OF LIKE CAMPAIGN POSITIONS ABOUT DEVELOPMENT HERE AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO TRY AND LIKE USHER IN THIS SMALL COMMUNITY, AND WE WANT TO SORT OF GET IN THE WAY AND REGULATE THE MARKET. THAT WAY TO HAVE THINGS HAPPEN THE WAY WE WANT THEM TO HAPPEN, WHICH I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND, BUT I JUST WONDER LIKE AT WHAT POINT ARE WE GOING TO SAY? WE WANT TO REGULATE THE MARKET A LITTLE IN TERMS OF LIKE OUR TEACHERS AND OUR FIRST RESPONDERS AND OTHER FOLKS THAT OUR NEIGHBOR IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WHO MAYBE CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY THEIR OWN HOME OR FOR OTHER REASONS, NEED TO RENT OR CAN'T AFFORD THESE CRAZY CRAZY HOUSING PRICES. SO JUST A LITTLE LIKE THOUGHT THERE. YOU KNOW, WE ARE GETTING IN THE WAY OF THE MARKET IN SOME WAYS, AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO THINK ABOUT DOING THAT IN TERMS OF LIKE CROW PEOPLE AS WELL, NOT JUST PRO ENVIRONMENT. THANKS THANK YOU. OKAY, ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT? THAT TOO, SUSAN. IF YOU JUST IF ANYBODY HAS ANY

[00:45:01]

OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT, PLEASE GIVE THE GREEN SLIPS TO THE CLERK. THANK YOU, HIGH COMMISSIONER. SO YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE OZONE GREENWOOD 10 40 SOUTHEAST WITH A CIRCLE APARTMENT. FOUR UM AND I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF HOUSING SOLUTIONS COUNCIL AND FAMILY PROMISE FAMILY PROMISES MY PAYING JOB HOUSING SOLUTIONS COUNCIL. MY VOLUNTEER JOB, A FAMILY PROMISE. WE HELP MEMBERS OF OUR WORKFORCE THAT WORK FULL TIME EVERY DAY THAT ARE EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS, AND THESE ARE FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN IN MARTIN COUNTY THAT HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED HOMELESSNESS. AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN THEIR LIVES THAT THEY'VE EXPERIENCED HOMELESSNESS, AND THAT'S IT'S STRICTLY DUE TO THE RISING COSTS AND RENTS SO THEY'RE TRYING TO SAVE HER HOME OWNERSHIP BECAUSE THEY LOVE TO BE PART OF THE AMERICAN DREAM. BUT THEY CAN'T SAVE BECAUSE THE RENTS ARE TOO HIGH HELPED. WE'VE JUST RECENTLY HELPED THE TEACHER WHO FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HER LIFE EXPERIENCE HOMELESSNESS, A TEACHER AT STEWART MIDDLE SCHOOL TO GET HER BACK INTO HOUSING. UM, PROVIDE SHELTER. WE HELPED A MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION SPECIALIST TRANSPORTS PEOPLE THAT THEY KNOW BY NAME THEY CALL CALL ON HIM WHEN THEY'RE TRYING TO UNDER LEAVING THE HOSPITAL NEED TO GET TO THEIR HOUSING. UM, AND HAVE THAT SUPPORT WE WORK WITH PEOPLE IN SO MANY DIFFERENT AREAS OF OUR ESSENTIAL SERVICES WORKFORCE, AND THEY'RE EMBARRASSED TO COME HERE AND SPEAK AND I AM COMMANDED SHARIF FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COME AND INTO SPEAK, BUT WE HAVE A LOT OF PROFESSIONALS AS SHARE ALSO SAID THAT ARE THE MIDDLE CLASS THAT ARE NOW EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THEIR LIVES. THEY'RE VERY EMBARRASSED. THEY'RE AFRAID TO COME UP HERE AND SPEAK. THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO JUDGE THEM TO THINK THAT THEY'RE NOT. MANAGING THEIR THEIR BUDGET WHILE THEY'RE DOING EVERYTHING THEY CAN, BUT WHEN YOU'RE PAYING 50% OR MORE OF YOUR HOUSEHOLD INCOME ON HOUSING, YOU CANNOT STAY FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP. SO WE IT'S IMPERATIVE THAT WE ARE VERY STRATEGIC. AND I APPRECIATE THE COMMISSION. YOU ALL HAVE BEEN WONDERFUL WITH WORKING WITH US AND HOUSING SOLUTIONS COUNCIL TO TRY TO DEVELOP HOUSING THAT WE GUARANTEE WILL MAINTAIN SUPPORT ABILITY THAT WILL GIVE PREFERENCE TO OUR LOCALS TO BE ABLE TO LIVE IN. AND THESE ARE FOR OUR WORKFORCE THAT ARE IN THAT 30 TO 80% OF THE AREA MEETING INCOME, THOSE PEOPLE THAT JUST MAKE A LITTLE TOO MUCH TO QUALIFY FOR GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY, BUT FAR TOO LITTLE TO AFFORD THE MARKET RENTS. I KNOW YOU HEAR ME, SAY IT OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, BUT THAT'S THAT GAP WORKFORCE THAT DESPERATELY NEEDS THIS TYPE OF HOUSING AND THIS LOCATION ON MLK AND GEORGIA AVENUE IS IDEAL FOR WHAT EVERYONE SAID THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF OPPORTUNITY. THE WALK ABILITY THE BILL ABILITY TO HAVE ONE CAR NOT TO CARS TO DECREASE OUR TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF THE COMMUNITY, SO WE JUST WE COULD BE BEAUTIFUL. IT CAN BE QUALITY. IT CAN BE MAINTAINED BEAUTIFULLY, AND IT WILL HELP OUR COMMUNITY. IT'LL LOOK BEAUTIFUL. IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO, AND I HOPE THAT YOU WILL RECONSIDER IT AND HELP OUR LOCAL WORKFORCE BECAUSE WE NEED YOU ALL TO DO SOMETHING TO HELP PROTECT OUR LOCALS, REMOVING THEM OUT OF THE COUNTY AND ALL OF THE STATE. ST LUCIE COUNTY HAS NO LONGER AFFORDABLE EITHER. THERE'S NO PLACE FOR THEM TO GO AND SOME VERY SAD THING. SO THE ONE SIDE HOUSING SOLUTIONS COUNCIL PREVENTION FAMILY PROMISED. WE WORK WITH HOMELESSNESS, HELPING THE HOMELESS, YOU KNOW, IN A CRISIS AND WE JUST HOPE THAT YOU CAN HELP BE A PART OF IT SO WE CAN END HOMELESSNESS ONCE AND FOR ALL. THANK YOU, HAWKINS, ERIN HAWKINS. HERE HE COMES. HOW'S EVERYONE DOING? MY NAME IS AARON HAWKINS. I LOVE IT. 16 16, SOUTHEAST ARAPAHOE AVENUE AND STEWART. UM. I MOVED OUT OF MY PARENTS' PLACE LAST YEAR AND ENDED UP HAVING TO GO BACK, THOUGH. UNFORTUNATELY, UM I GOT PUSHED OUT OF THE PLACE. I WAS RENTING BY A LANDLORD THAT CONSISTENTLY TRIED TO RAISE THE RENT EVERY MONTH. AND, UH, YOU KNOW, HE THEY RELIED ON THE EXCUSE THAT THE MARKET WAS WHAT WAS PUSHING THE RENTER. AND I THINK THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING UM , YOU KNOW, I'M WELL AWARE OF WHERE I LIVE. YOU KNOW, MY PARENTS WERE 60 70 YEARS OLD. SO BUT I THINK WE FORGET A LOT THAT THERE'S A LOT OF YOUNG PEOPLE HERE. AND A LOT OF PROFESSIONS AROUND TOWN THAT AREN'T NECESSARILY AT THE TOP OF THEIR CAREER EARNING POTENTIAL AT THE MOMENT AND WE, UH IT'S AH. IT'S EASY FOR US TO GET PUSHED OUT OF THE EQUATION WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HOUSING AFFORDABILITY HEARD A LOT OF PEOPLE SPEAK ABOUT YOU KNOW, AFFORDABLE HOUSING BEING AN ISSUE, BUT I THINK THAT WOULD BE A VERY, UH HELPFUL THING TO THOSE TYPES OF PEOPLE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, PRITCHARD. GOOD EVENING. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT IMPACT FEES. I WANTED TO UNDERSTAND HOW THEY ARE CALCULATED AND ARE THEY CALCULATED ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF UNITS THAT ARE BEING BUILT? IT'S JUST A GENERAL QUESTION. I WANTED TO KIND OF FIGURE IT OUT BECAUSE I KNOW THAT SOME OF THOSE MONIES GO TO THE SCHOOL

[00:50:01]

BOARD, AND I WANTED TO KNOW HOW IT WAS CALCULATED IF IT'S ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT OR APPORTION AND I WAS HOPING THAT MAYBE YOU COULD EXPLAIN IT TO ME. IN ANOTHER VENUE, PERHAPS, BUT I JUST WANTED TO TALK ABOUT IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I'LL SEE IF YOU HAVE THE CITY MANAGER REACH OUT TO YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY, MARK BREAKABLE. BILL TWO OH, EIGHT. SOUTHEAST OSCEOLA STREET.

STUART, FLORIDA. I LOVE IT, UM, COUPLE THINGS ONE. MOST PEOPLE HAVE HEARD MY STANDARD QUOTE.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING ISN'T AFFORDABLE UNLESS YOU CAN AFFORD IT. THIS IS ABOUT JOBS AS MUCH AS IT'S ABOUT HOUSING, WE HAVE TO CREATE BETTER JOBS. FOR PEOPLE IN THIS CITY. WE HAVE TO CREATE HIGHER PAYING JOBS. WE HAVE TO CREATE SUSTAINABLE JOBS. BUT I DO WANT TO UNDERSTAND TO MAKE A COMMENT. PEOPLE HAVE TO UNDERSTAND YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND. HOW COMMERCIAL HOUSING VERSUS RESIDENTIAL HOUSING IS PRICED. THERE WHEN YOU GO BUY A HOUSE. THERE'S AN APPRAISAL DONE, THAT'S BASED ON THE SALES APPROACH OR THE REPLACEMENT OF COST APPROACH, AND THAT'S WHAT DETERMINES THE VALUE. BUT WHEN YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, THAT'S NOT THE CASE. THERE'S A THIRD CALCULATION. IT'S THE INCOME APPROACH SO AS SOON AS YOU REDUCE THE INCOME, YOU REDUCE THE VALUE OF THAT PROPERTY. SO AS WE LOOK AT SUBSIDIES AND THE MORE WE SUBSIDIZED, THE LESS VALUABLE THAT PROPERTY BECOMES. WHICH HURTS US FROM AND AFFORDABILITY STANDPOINT, WE'RE PUTTING PEOPLE IN SUB STANDARD HOUSING. WHICH I DON'T WANT TO DO. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. BUT AND WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE CREATED A LOT OF HOUSING THAT'S LIVING ON THIS ON THIS INCOME APPROACH WHEN YOU HAVE OUTSIDE INVESTORS.

THEY HAVE TO PRODUCE A RETURN. THEY BOUGHT A PROJECT FOR $100 MILLION. THEY NEED TO PRODUCE A CERTAIN RETURN. THAT MEANS THEY CANNOT LOWER THOSE RENTS. THEY WILL NEVER BE AFFORDABLE NOW WHEN YOU TAKE LOCALLY OWNED HOUSING, WHETHER IT'S INDIVIDUALLY OWNED OR LOCALLY OWNED, THEY CAN AFFORD TO TAKE LESS BECAUSE THEY'RE KEEPING THE APPRECIATION. SO THEY CAN AFFORD . IF THEY GET A GOOD TENANT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO RAISE THE RENT QUITE AS MUCH. AND SO WHEN WE HAVE SHIFT FROM CORPORATE HOUSING AWAY FROM HER OWNER, OCCUPIED HOUSING OR OWNER OWNED HOUSING THAT'S LOCAL OWNERSHIP. IT'S AFFECTING THE ABILITY OF PEOPLE TO AFFORD WHERE THEY LIVE . FURTHERMORE IF YOU'RE IN AN APARTMENT AND MARKET PRICES ARE INCREASING, LIKE THEY'VE BEEN INCREASING. YOU'RE GETTING FARTHER AND FARTHER AWAY, YOU ARE BECOMING MORE AND MORE HOMELESS. THE LONGER YOU'RE STAYING IN A FACILITY THAT'S NOT KEEPING UP WITH INFLATION. THE LONGER AND FARTHER AWAY. YOUR CHANCES OF SURVIVING AND STAYING HERE ARE GOING AND I DEAL WITH THAT. I'M I'M AN INDIVIDUAL AND DIVORCED. I'M LIVING IN AN APARTMENT. I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IT COSTS AND I DON'T HAVE BIG INCOME TO DO THAT. I'M DIVORCED. DO YOU HEAR THAT? SO I DON'T DON'T HAVE A LOT OF INCOME FOR THAT. SO I'M JUST SAYING THE TYPE OF HOUSING AS FAR AS AFFORDABILITY IS VERY IMPORTANT , AND WE NEED TO FOCUS ON THAT. THE LAST THING I'LL SAY ABOUT HOUSING IS IT'S NOT JUST NOT ABOUT RENT. IT'S ABOUT THE UTILITIES, AND WHEN YOUR ELECTRIC GOES UP AND YOUR AND YOUR WATER GOES UP, AND ALL OF THOSE OTHER COSTS GO UP.

EVERYTHING ELSE GOES UP, AND IT MAKES IT THAT MUCH HARDER TO SURVIVE. THANK YOU, JOSEPH COOPER. BRING. COMMISSIONERS YES. JOHN SCOBLE 9069906, SOUTH EAST NINTH STREET. YEAH JUST KIND OF PICK IT BACK ON SOME OF THE THINGS HE HAS TALKED ABOUT, BUT I THINK WE ALWAYS HAVE TO CONTINUE TO BALANCE COST OF LIVING VERSUS WAGES. AND I'VE ALWAYS LAGGED RIGHT. WAGES ALWAYS LAG HISTORICALLY, PART OF AFFORDABILITY IS WHETHER OR NOT YOU CAN AFFORD TO PAY. AND SO THIS IS AFFECTED, NOT JUST THE CITY OF STUART BROAD NATIONWIDE, WHEREAS WE HAVE TO CREATE THIS SO CALLED ADDRESS THAT NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING HAS TO BE A DELICATE BALANCE. EVEN WITH DEVELOPMENT, WE STILL HAVE TO HAVE A MIXED USE OF DEVELOPMENT , WHETHER IT'S LOW AND MIDDLE, MODERATE, MEDIUM AND HIGH, AND SO IT'S. IT'S VERY A GREW UP HERE. I KNOW MY PARENTS WERE BUYING HOMES AND 1971 I MEAN, WE HAD A BIG FAMILY COST OF LIVING WAS NOT AS IT WAS STILL HIGHER, BUT THE WAGE WILL MORE BALANCED. THE COUNTRY HAS GOTTEN OUT OF CONTROL. WE CONSUME A LOT AND SO , BUT I THINK WITH THE CITY WITHIN THE CITY OF STORY, I THINK IT'S BEEN A GREAT BALANCING ACT THAT HAS OCCURRED AND I KNOW FOLKS ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT. YOU KNOW, I'M IN THE BUSINESS CONSTRUCTION, BUT WHEN YOU TRY TO BUILD AFFORDABLE, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT WHEN MATERIALS UP COST OF LABORERS UP AND YOU'RE TRYING TO BUILD AFFORDABLE. IT IS SOMETIMES UNATTAINABLE AND WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. EVEN WHEN YOU DO SOMETIMES SUBSIDIZED, IT'S A POINT SYSTEM. YOU CAN'T BUILD A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT SOME CREDIT FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND

[00:55:02]

ITS A COMPETITIVE AND SO THE BIGGER CITIES GONNA GET A LOT OF THOSE DOLLARS SO WE'RE IN THE CITY CAN CONTINUE TO TRY TO ADDRESS THE NEED AND A BALANCED APPROACH. UM WE CAN'T SAY WE CAN'T BUILD APARTMENTS THAT COST 3000 BECAUSE THAT'S JUST THE MARKET. BUT YOU CAN CREATE SOMETHING THAT'S BELOW THAT. BUT THEN YOU HAVE TO STILL BRING THE WAGES UP. WAGE DON'T GO UP YOU, YOU KNOW, I'M GONNA BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT THAT POPULATION THAT CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY $2000 A MONTH BUT WITH THE RENT OF THREE OR $400, THEY'RE GONE FOREVER. THEY'RE GONE. 1008. THEY'RE GONE. THEY'RE NOT GONNA COME BACK. SO WE CREATED, CONTINUING TO DO OR CREATE A BALANCE APPROACH WITHIN THE CITY TO ADDRESS THE NEED OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, BUT UNDERSTANDING WITHOUT THESE JOBS THAT CAN SUSTAIN EVEN BECAUSE YOU KNOW I CAN'T POUND CARPENTER 10,000 AN HOUR. I GOTTA PAY HIM 25. AND SO THAT MEANS I GOTTA CHARGE THE CLIENT. 35 I GOT PAID TAXES. I GOTTA DO ALL THOSE THINGS, SO I THINK WE CAN DO A BALANCED APPROACH TO TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT. PRIVATE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT THEY WANT TO DO IT FOR THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO SAY. NO, I DON'T WANNA DO THAT. SO CITIES ARE NOT DEVELOPMENTS GOVERNMENT YOU CAN'T DEVELOP PRIVATE DEVELOPERS GOVERNMENT, THE GOVERNMENT JUST OVERSEAS. AND SO WE WANT TO ADDRESS IT. UM I THINK IT'S ENCOURAGING THAT PEOPLE COMING BUT IT MEANS IT MUST BE A COLLECTIVE EFFORT. THAT WE'RE GONNA ADDRESS WITHIN REASON. WE JUST HAVE TO CONTINUE TO BE BALANCED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU AND OUR FINAL SPEAKER IS RUDY JAMISON. WE MAY HAVE ANOTHER SPEAKER. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS RUDY JAMISON. I WAS BORN AND RAISED EVERY MORNING COUNTY.

THIS IS THE BEST CITY IN THE WORLD HAVE BEEN IN THE MILITARY. I'M A VETERAN. EVERY TIME I WOULD GO ANYWHERE. I COULDN'T WAIT TO GET BACK HOME. THIS IS MY HOME. THIS IS WHERE MY GRANDCHILDREN I HAVE. NINE GRANDCHILDREN HAVE BEEN MARRIED 40 YEARS I'VE BEEN MARRIED FOR 40 YEARS. MY WIFE. WE BOTH WERE BORN AND RAISED DURING STEWART. WE WENT TO MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL, DAVE. AH THIS IS A WONDERFUL PLACE TO LIVE WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING. WHAT IT IS. IS THESE PEOPLE THAT HAVE COME IN HERE? THAT BUILD ALL OF THESE APARTMENTS. THEY'RE NOT FROM HERE. THEY COME TO MAKE THEY COME TO A. THEY GET ALL THIS BEAUTIFUL SON. THAT'S GREAT LIVING THAT WE HAVE HERE IN STORIES. BUT WE HAVE PEOPLE HERE THAT HAVE BEEN HERE FOR YEARS THAT WAS BORN AND RAISED HERE AND NOW THEY'RE BEING PUSHED OUT. WE NEED TO CONSIDER WE NEED TO CONSIDER EACH OTHER. YOU KNOW, THE WORD SAYS, YOU KNOW, TREAT ME THE WAY I WANT TO BE TREATED WHERE YOU WANT TO BE TREATED. I WANT US TO LOVE EACH OTHER. WE GOD LOVES US. IF WE WERE TO SHOW LOVE FOR EVERYONE, WE WOULDN'T HAVE THIS PROBLEM.

WE GOT THESE PEOPLE THAT ARE COMING IN HERE AND MAKE IT EASY, CRAZY. I MEAN, WHO CAN AFFORD TO ABOUT ONE BEDROOM APARTMENT FOR 1500? THAT'S MORE THAN MY MORTGAGE. YOU'RE NEVER GONNA BE ABLE TO GET OUT OF THOSE APARTMENTS. IF YOU'RE SPENDING $5000 ON THE PART UNLESS YOU'RE MAKING 50 60 70,000 YEAR. BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE GOT PEOPLE THAT REALLY DON'T CARE ABOUT PEOPLE. THEY WANT TO CARE ABOUT MONEY. THAT'S ALL THEY CARE ABOUT. BUT THIS IS A WONDERFUL CITY. A WONDERFUL CITY AND WE HAVE GREAT PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THIS CITY. WE GOT GREAT COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE A GREAT POLICE DEPARTMENT. EVERYTHING HERE IS GREAT. PEOPLE WISH THEY COULD BE LIKE STEWART. THERE ARE STILL OTHER CITIES THAT ARE TERRIBLE. THERE ARE TERRIBLE.

BUT WE HAVE THIS JEWEL THAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE A PART OF DON'T LET US JUST LET THIS THING GO AWAY. DON'T LET PEOPLE COME AND TAKE THIS FROM US. THIS IS OUR HOME. LET'S TREAT IT LIKE IT'S OUR HOME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JOE FLANAGAN. THANK YOU, JOE. GOOD EVENING. WHEN I MOVED HERE IN 1989. I BOUGHT MY HOUSE FOR $72,000. AND AS A BEGINNING TEACHER BACK THEN OR NOT QUITE BEGINNING I MADE ABOUT $35,000. SO ABOUT DOUBLE MY SALARY WOULD BUY ME A HOUSE IN TWO YEARS. UM, WHEN I RETIRED THREE YEARS AGO FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HAD BEEN 39 YEARS MASTERS DEGREE ADMINISTRATOR SO I WAS MAKING ABOUT $80,000 A YEAR. MY HOUSE TODAY IS WORTH $325,000, ACCORDING TO ZILLOW. AND MORE ON THE REAL ESTATE. PEOPLE DON'T LIKE THAT, BUT THE THING IS, I LIVE BENEATH MY MEANS. TWO BEDROOM, TWO BATH HOUSE AND RAISED A FAMILY OF FOUR. I CAN VACUUM MY WHOLE HOUSE FROM ONE OUTLET. YEAH IT'S THAT MINE IS WHAT WOULD BE CATEGORIZED AS A STARTER HOME. THAT'S WHAT WE DO NOT HAVE ANY MORE IN STUART IN MARTIN COUNTY. WE DON'T HAVE STARTER HOMES. MY OLDEST SON, GOD BLESS HIM. 30 YEARS OLD. HE DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN MY HOUSE. HE DOES AN INDIAN TOWN. AND HE CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE IN INDIAN TOWN. EVEN THE RATES

[01:00:04]

THERE ARE KIND OF HOT NOW. I DON'T PRESUME TO SAY THIS IS THE PERFECT PROPERTY TO DO THIS. I THINK IT WOULD BE GOOD BUT I DON'T HAVE THE ANSWERS. YOU GUYS HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MOVE THINGS FORWARD. SO WHATEVER YOU CAN DO I KNOW THAT I'M ON A COUPLE OF COMMITTEES, AND ONE OF THEM IS THE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST . WE'RE DEVELOPING THIS. IT'S A REALLY GOOD THING. IF YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT, PLEASE DO SOME RESEARCH. IT'S IMPORT ST LUCIE. IT'S IN PALM BEACH COUNTY. IT NEEDS TO BE HERE AND IT'S A WHOLE DIFFERENT STORY. BUT I'M NOT GOING TO GIVE THAT TIME NOW.

BUT IF WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE, EITHER IN STARTER HOMES OR THE WORKFORCE. I LOVE THE IDEA. I USED TO MAKE THE COMMENT. MY TEACHERS CANNOT AFFORD TO LIVE HERE. AND THEY NEED TO AND ALL THE SERVICES AND EVERYTHING IN THAT MID MANAGEMENT, PLEASE. ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO HELP US.

MOVE FORWARD. I WILL END WITH THIS. I KNOW THE STATE LEGISLATORS HAVE TAKEN AWAY A LOT OF THE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY. WE USED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A DENSITY BONUS. IF IT'S ZONED FOR THIS AMOUNT, WE CAN ADD FIVE OR SIX OR SEVEN UNITS PER ACRE. BUT IN TURN, YOU WILL NOW GIVE US THIS. THAT'S KIND OF GONE AWAY. IT'S NOT AS GOOD AS IT USED TO BE. SO WE HAVE BEEN WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE THOSE DEALS WITH DEVELOPERS. SO A LOT OF THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED HERE RECENTLY. YOU DON'T HAVE A LOT OF CONTROL. IT WAS SAID, WELL, YOU GUYS APPROVED IT. IF YOU SAY NO. YOU GETTING ALL KINDS OF TROUBLE. I CAN GO AHEAD AND SAY THAT FROM FROM EXPERIENCING THINGS SO ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO MOVE IT FORWARD TO MAKE IT SO MY SON CAN HAVE A PLACE TO LIVE IN , STUART. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JOE WILL OFFLINE. HELLO MY NAME IS WALL OFFLINE. 11 9 50 SOUTH CANADA HIGHWAY UNIT C 23. I LIVE IN AN APARTMENT, SO AND I'VE SEEN SOME OF MY NEIGHBORS LOSE THEIR ABILITY TO LIVE IN MY LITTLE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AFFORD THE RENT. I'M FULLY AWARE AH, THE CRISIS THAT WE FACE, THE CRISIS THAT WE FACE IS A DIRECT RESULT. OF HIGH INFLATION. WHAT CAUSES THAT HIGH INFLATION GOVERNMENT? OKAY, THE GOVERNMENT'S DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH THE ART PROBLEM. PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT. AND NOW IT'S THE CLASSIC HEGELIAN DIALECTIC. THE GOVERNMENT CAUSES THE PROBLEM. PEOPLE HAVE THEY COMPLAIN BECAUSE THEY GOT A PROBLEM, AND NOW THEY COME BACK TO THE GOVERNMENT TO HELP SOLVE THE PROBLEM. I WOULD JUST SAY I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU ALL TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT GETTING INVOLVED. WITH, UM WHAT SHOULD BE A PRIVATE ENTERPRISE. FOR EXAMPLE, EVERYBODY RECOGNIZES THAT SOCIALISM IS A FAILURE. IS FELT IN EVERY EVERY COUNTRY IN EVERY LOCATION. THEY WOULD ALSO PROBABLY RECOGNIZE THAT CAPITALISM HAS BEEN A GREAT SUCCESS HAS BROUGHT MANY PEOPLE OUT OF POVERTY. BUT YET HERE WE ARE PEOPLE ASKING FOR SOCIALISM. ESSENTIALLY. WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT? SHOULD WE BE INVOLVED WITH THIS ANYWAY? I DO AGAIN RECOGNIZE THERE'S A MASSIVE PROBLEM. I DEAL WITH IT . MY I'VE LOST NEIGHBORS, SO BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR DECISIONS AND GOOD LUCK TO YOU AND CONGRATULATIONS TO CAMPBELL RICH AND CHRIS COLLINS FOR WINNING AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND REMARKS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY, ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY I THINK THAT WE HAVE COMPLETED PUBLIC COMMENT AND WE'LL GO BACK TO THE ITEM THAT I COVERED UP MY PEN AND MISSED. SO UH, ITEM ONE, WHICH IS THE PROPOSED FORM BASED

[1. PROPOSED FORM BASED CODE FOR THE EAST STUART NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE CREEK DISTRICT, PRESENTED BY THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL]

CODE FOR E. STEWART HOOD AND THE CREEK DISTRICT PANEL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR MAYOR. THANK YOU.

IT'S VERY NICE OF THESE PEOPLE TO COME OUT AND SHARE THEIR CONCERN. PERHAPS WE COULD GET THEM A ROUGH IDEA WHEN WE MIGHT GET TO THE DISCUSSION. ABOUT THE ISSUE THEY ALL SPOKE TO, BECAUSE AS MUCH AS WE DON'T MIND SITTING HERE FOR THREE HOURS. I'M NOT SURE. WHEN WE GET IT'S GONNA BE THE UNREASONABLE OR REASONABLE REQUEST. I KNOW IT SHOULDN'T BE LONG. SEYMOUR'S PRESENTATION IS QUITE LENGTHY. YEAH, UM WELL, IF IT'S THE IF IT'S THE WISH OF THE COMMISSION, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL PEOPLE HERE FOR THE CREEK DISTRICT AS WELL. SO I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND DO THE CREEK DISTRICT BUT WEEKEND IF IT'S OKAY, IF THE COMMISSION WE CAN MAKE IT THE FIRST ITEM ON THE DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION BECAUSE ONCE WE GET THROUGH THE CREEK DISTRICT, IT'LL GO PRETTY FAST. THE AGENDA I BELIEVE OKAY, IS THAT WITH THE REST OF THE COMMISSION OKAY? SO WE'LL DO THAT WE'LL DO THAT FIRST AS THE FIRST DND. OKAY, OKAY. THANK YOU. MR MAYOR. OKAY OKAY. THANK YOU. PANEL GANDHI SALVE DOES, UM, FOR THE RECORD, SIERRA DIRECTOR I'M JUST GONNA INTRODUCE THE ITEM. AS YOU KNOW, STAFF HAS BEEN WORKING ON THE FORM BASED CODE FOR OVER A YEAR , AND I JUST WANT TO QUICKLY GO OVER ALL THE TIME LINE. THE TWO AREAS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. IS

[01:05:05]

THAT YOU STUART STUDY AREA IN THE CREEK DISTRICT STUDY AREA. UM I WANT TO GO TO THE TIMELINE FOR THE NEW COMMISSIONERS AND THE PUBLIC. THE BOARD ACTUALLY APPROVED THE BUDGET TO WORK ON THE FORM BASED CODE IN AUGUST 2021. THEN WE DID THE INTER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN SEPTEMBER. 2021 THE TRAGIC LOSS REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL INTRODUCED THE CONCEPT OF FORM BASED CODE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ZONING TO THE BOARD IN NOVEMBER 2021. THEN WE BEGAN THE INTERVIEW PROCESS WITH STAKEHOLDERS BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMISSIONERS TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE CHALLENGES IN THE AREA. AND WHAT KIND OF WHAT KIND OF WORK THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE FORM BASED CODE. AGAIN WE'VE BEEN HAVING A LOT OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN EARLY JANUARY. WE HAD THE VISION WORKSHOP. THEN WE DID THE WALKING TOUR LATE JANUARY. WE ALSO HAD, UM. NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOP IN MARCH, AND THEN WE HAD TO WORK IN PROGRESS MEETING IN JUNE, WHERE WE HAD TWO PRESENTATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING SOME OF THE CHANGES THAT WE'RE PROPOSING AS PART OF THE FORM BASED CODE. UH TRAGIC COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL ON A SEPARATE NOTE, THEY ALSO HAD TWO MEETINGS WITH CONCERNS CITIZENS OF EAST STEWART AND AGAIN THEY INTERVIEWED AND ENGAGED WITH MORE THAN 85. RESIDENTS PROPERTY OWNERS, STAKEHOLDERS COMMUNITY CRB MEMBERS AND CITY COMMISSIONERS. WE DO HAVE A WE ALSO DID THE PRESENTATIONS TO THE CRB ELPIDA AND TONIGHT IS THE CITY COMMISSION. BOTH BOARD BOARDS HAVE APPROVED TO MOVE FORWARD AND BRING THE ORDINANCES IN, UM NOVEMBER FOUR FOR ADOPTION HEARINGS. AND WE HAVE THE PRESENTATION BY JESSE IN THE RECENT FEW WEEKS. WE'VE BEEN RELEASING A LOT LOT OF COMMENTS FROM LOCAL DEVELOPERS AND ARCHITECTS. WE'VE BEEN ADDRESSING THOSE COMMENTS. IT'S HELPING US TEST THE CODE AND ADDRESS THAT AND MAKE MODIFICATIONS AS WE AS WE MOVE FORWARD, I'LL LET JESSE PRESENT THE DRAFTS. OKAY AND I'M GONNA ASK THE COMMISSIONERS IF WE CAN HOLD QUESTIONS TO THE END OF THAT, JESSE GET THROUGH HER ENTIRE PRESENTATION. SO THANK YOU. JESSICA SEYMOUR FROM TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. UM, PLEASURE TO BE HERE, UM. AND I WILL. I UNDERSTAND THAT, UM LOTS OF YOU ARE WAITING AND YOU'RE NOT WAITING FOR ME, SO I WILL DO MY BEST TO GO THROUGH THESE MUCH AS POSSIBLE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. LET'S TURN THIS ON. OKAY SO TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL FOR FOLKS WHO DON'T KNOW WE'RE A PUBLIC AGENCY WERE ONE OF 10 REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS IN THE STATE, AND WE ONLY GO WHERE LOCAL SO WE ARE AH! CAN YOU HOLD ON TO YOUR MARK COMES ON. WHAT. LIFE IS ALL RESIST IT. OH HE'S JUST BEING A BAD BOY. I DON'T BLAME HIM. IN WHICH HE WATCHED TV. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, THIS BETTER CAN YOU HEAR ME? FANTASTIC OKAY, SO, AS I SAID, WE WORK FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, UM AND SO WE'VE BEEN ASKED VERY EXCITED TO WORK IN THE CITY OF STEWART SINCE I LIVE IN THE CITY OF STEWART. UM, I GET TO LIVE THE ONE CAR LIFESTYLE AND STUART THAT WAS MENTIONED EARLIER. UM THIS IS ANOTHER VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE OUTREACH THAT WE'VE DONE. I WON'T GO OVER IT. UM EXCEPT FOR WHAT'S COMING UP NEXT. SO TODAY IS THE COMMISSION MEETING REPRESENTING ? THERE'S NO ACTIONS. THIS IS, UM REALLY FOR US TO TEST THE WATERS ENGAGED WITH THE COMMISSION. MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE YOU KNOW, WE'RE HEADING THE SHIP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION . UM WE'LL ALSO DO A FOLLOW UP PRESENTATION AT THE 10TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER. UM, COMING UP ON OCTOBER 11TH. AND THEN THE ADOPTION HEARINGS HOPEFULLY, WILL BE IN NOVEMBER. UM WHAT WE'RE DOING, AND WHAT WE'VE BEEN ASKED TO DO IS TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE ZONING CODES AND ZONING CODES ARE ARE THE SETBACKS THE PERMITTED USES? THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT FOLKS LOOK AT WHEN THEY WANT TO REDEVELOP OR DEVELOP A NEW PIECE OF PROPERTY.

BUILD A HOME BUILDING ADDITION, BUILD A BUSINESS AND WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY UNDERSTOOD THAT THESE ARE THE RULES AND THE REGULATIONS FOR FUTURE PROJECTS THAT DOESN'T AFFECT YOUR EXISTING STRUCTURES IF THEY DO DEVIATE IN ANY WAY. A FROM WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING. WE HAVE, UM TRY TO HONOR AS MANY OF THE EXISTING STANDARDS THAT ARE THERE TODAY, SO THE PROPERTIES DO COMPLY WITH THE NEW STANDARDS. AND THIS TOOL IS THIS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, ALSO KNOWN AS ZONING CODES ARE REALLY A TOOL FOR STAFF AND FOR THE COMMUNITY, UM, TO BE ABLE TO

[01:10:04]

SHAPE MORE PREDICTABLE, BUILT RESULTS. WHAT WE WANT TO HAVE WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND OUR ZONING IS PREDICTABILITY AND WHAT OUR NEIGHBORS CAN DO. UM APPLICANTS WANT TO HAVE PREDICTABILITY AND WHAT THEY CAN DO WHEN THEY BUILD ONTO THEIR PROPERTIES AS WELL. SO THAT THAT'S ALWAYS THE GOAL WHEN WE GO THROUGH THIS KIND OF CODE UPDATE AND ANALYSIS. ASUS IS HOW CAN WE MAKE THE PROCESS CLEARER AND MORE PREDICTABLE FOR EVERYONE? UM WE DEVELOPED TWO CODES. SO THE FIRST IS THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT IS THE EAST STEWART NEIGHBORHOOD CODE AND THEN THE CREEK DISTRICT CODE. THEY HAVE TWO DIFFERENT NAMES BECAUSE THEY'RE TWO DIFFERENT PLACES. THEY HAVE TWO DIFFERENT PLACES IN THE IN THE ZONING REGULATIONS. UM YOU'LL NOTE THAT YOU STEWART IS A NEIGHBORHOOD CODE THAT'S GEARED TOWARDS PROMOTING ITS NORMAL HOOD NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. AND THE CREEK DISTRICT. IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR IS THE SPINE OF WHICH RUNS ALONG COLORADO. UM AND THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE A LOT MORE COMMERCIAL USES, SO I HAD DIFFERENT FOCUS. UM RIGHT OUT OF THE GATE. I WANT TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DO NOT ADD ANY ADDITIONAL STORIES IN A STUDENT . WE'RE GONNA FOCUS ON E. STEWART FIRST, AND THEY DON'T ADD ANY DENSITY THAT'S NOT ALREADY PERMITTED UNDER THOSE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM WE ALSO WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROCESS WAS AS CLEAR AS POSSIBLE TO APPLICANTS INTO THE COMMUNITY. SO WE'VE ADDED THIS CHART RIGHT HERE. UM WE NOTED THAT THE CRB NEEDED TO BE INCLUDED IN SOME OF THESE, UM, APPLICATION PROCESSES. WE'VE HIGHLIGHTED THOSE THERE AS WELL AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY. WE ALSO ADDED, UM, LANGUAGE UP AT THE TOP HERE. AH PROMPTING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MAY REQUEST THE APPLICANT HOST A COMMUNITY WORKSHOP WITH ANY ACTIVE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS IN THAT AREA. SO FOR E. STEWART IF AN APPLICATION SEEMED APPROPRIATE TO GO BEFORE, UM, THE COMMUNITY, THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR COULD REQUESTED THAT GO BEFORE A GROUP LIKE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF EAST STEWART RACES SO THEIR INPUT COULD BE BROUGHT IN AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCESS. UM WE ALSO MODIFIED THE MAJOR DEVELOPMENT NUMBERS RIGHT NOW. A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, WHICH IS NOTED IN THIS SECTION IS KICKED OFF WITH 35 DWELLING UNITS OR 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL OR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THOSE ARE REALLY, REALLY BIG NUMBERS FOR EAST STEWART, SO WE WANTED TO UM, ACKNOWLEDGE THE SCALE OF E STEWART AND LOWER THOSE NUMBERS . SO WE STUDIED WHAT WAS THE BUILT FABRIC IN EAST STEWART AND REFLECTED THAT IN THE MAJOR DEVELOPMENT NUMBERS, AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT IF AN APPLICANT CAME IN, THEY CAN STILL COME IN. UM BUT THEY WOULD GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS THAT REQUIRES ADDITIONAL, UM, PUBLIC HEARINGS. THIS IS THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAPS, SO WE'RE GOING TO START HIGH LEVEL WITH THE FUTURE LAND. USE FUTURE LAND USE AS YOUR YOU KNOW, BIG BREAKS YOUR BIG STOPS ON WHAT YOU'RE ALLOWED PERMITTED TO DO, UM, WITHIN A CITY OR MUNICIPALITY. SO THAT'S YOUR BIG OVERVIEW. UM, SO TO SPEAK, AND YOU'RE ZONING IS WHERE YOU GET INTO AND YOUR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OR ARE YOU GOING INTO MUCH MORE DETAIL? UM ONE OF THE FIRST LAYER OF RECOMMENDATIONS IS REALLY CLEANING UP SOME OF THE EXISTING LAND USE SO THAT IS REFLECTIVE OF WHAT'S HAPPENING THERE TODAY. SO GERTRUDE WALDEN AND THE SPECTRUM ACADEMY WE WANT TO BRING THOSE INTO THE PUBLIC FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THAT ACTUALLY RESULTS IN FEWER POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THEN ACCURATELY REFLECTS THOSE USES. WE ALSO WANTED TO MAKE THE PROPERTIES CONSISTENT ALONG MLK AND ALONG 10TH STREET, SINCE THOSE NEIGHBORS ARE ALREADY WITHIN THE EAST STEWART NEIGHBORHOOD, SO ONE OF THE IMPORTANT THINGS THAT WE TALK ABOUT AND PLANNING IS THAT YOU WANT TO HAVE LIKE FACING LIKE, SO WE'RE HERE. THIS IS THE THING. THESE ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN ANOTHER COMMUNITY, AND THIS IS THE BACK OF COMMERCIAL. THIS IS NOT IDEAL. YOU DON'T WANT THE DUMPSTERS OR THE BACK OF BUILDINGS TO BE FACING YOUR STREET. YOU WANT SOMETHING LIKE THIS WHERE YOU'VE GOT, UM, THE FRONTS OF BUILDINGS FACING THE FRONT OF BUILDINGS. SO UM, SO THAT'S WHAT'S DRIVING. UM THIS THIS AH, ANALYSIS OVER HERE ON THE MLK AND 10TH STREET. THAT'S A PART OF IT. UM OKAY. UM ONE OF THOSE PROPERTIES HAS A PUBLIC DENSITY RIGHT NOW. PUBLIC FUTURE LAND USE, BUT IT'S ACTUALLY SOMEONE'S HOME, SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S A CORRECTED SO THAT'S ANOTHER. UM ANALYSIS THAT OUT. THIS IS ME. JUST FOR A ROCKFORD I'M GONNA GO BACK AND FORTH. SORRY. WE'RE GONNA GO ALONG THIS STREET AND ALONG THIS STREET IDENTIFYING EACH ONE OF THOSE. THIS IS THE SALVATION ARMY. RIGHT NOW. IT'S OFFICE RESIDENTIAL. WE'RE RECOMMENDING THE EAST STEWART DESIGNATION. UM YOU'LL SEE THAT THAT'S REALLY AWASH WHEN IT

[01:15:04]

COMES TO THE PERMITTED DENSITIES. UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SAME THING WITH THE MULTI FAMILY DENSITIES IF THERE WAS A MAXIMUM BUILD OUT OF THESE PROPERTIES, IT'S THE SAME AS WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING FOR THE FUTURE AGAIN. THE GOAL HERE IS NOT ABOUT INCREASING THE DENSITY OF A CLEANING UP THE LAND USES SO THAT THEY'RE CONSISTENT ALONG THIS ENTIRE THOROUGHFARE, AND WE HAVE CONSISTENT REGULATIONS THERE. UM OVER HERE. THIS IS LOW DENSITY.

THIS IS, UH, THIS IS TO THE NORTH AND MLK AND THIS IS ON 10TH STREET NURSES DIXIE LANE FOR ANYONE WHO IS FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA. UM THESE ARE GOING THESE ARE RECOMMENDED TO GO INTO THE E STEWART NEIGHBORHOOD. FOR THAT SAME REASON YOU'LL NOTE THAT THIS IS COMPLETELY BUILT OUT. SO IT'S NOT ABOUT CHANGING THE BUILT IN FABRIC, BUT IT TIES INTO SOME OF THE OTHER REGULATIONS THAT WILL TOUCH UPON LATER ABOUT. THOROUGHFARES STANDARDS, WHICH ARE ANOTHER WORD FOR STREET STANDARDS. SIDEWALK STANDARDS. UM AND THEN THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES IF A PROPERTY IS REDEVELOPED THAT IT CAN, UM TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME OF THE SETBACKS AND POLICIES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. UM OF THESE PROPERTIES. THIS IS THE ONLY ONE THAT IS VACANT AND IT HAS ALREADY APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR DAYCARE CENTER. UM I ALSO WANTED TO NOTE THAT ALTHOUGH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAY ALLOW FOR UP TO, UM 30 DWELLING UNITS EIGHT BY ANGER BY A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL. UH THE ZONING IS ACTUALLY CAPPED AT 17 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. SO ALTHOUGH IT MAY THE COMPREHENSIVE MAY HAVE THAT, UM THAT LANGUAGE IN THERE. THE ZONING BRINGS IT BACK DOWN TO THE RECOMMENDED ZONING BRINGS IT BACK DOWN TO THE 17 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. UM SO WHEN YOU ADD ALL THOSE CHANGES UP IF THERE WAS A, UH YOU KNOW, LARGE SCALE REDEVELOPMENT. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A DIFFERENCE OF 20 DWELLING UNITS, UM, ADDITIONAL TRAINING UNITS IN THIS DISTRICT AGAIN, MUCH OF IT IS BUILT OUT.

WE'RE NOT TRYING TO MOVE ANYONE OUT OF WHAT'S EXISTING TODAY. SO THAT'S JUST BUT WE LIKE TO DO THIS KIND OF ANALYSIS SO THAT WE KNOW WHERE WE'RE HEADED. AH, THIS IS THAT ZONING MAP. I THINK THIS TODAY AND SO TODAY. THIS IS PRIMARILY WHERE E STEWART. UM THAT'S EASTER OR FUTURE LAND USE IN THE E. STEWART ZONING DISTRICTS ARE COLLECTED AND WE ARE LOOKING AT THE ENTIRETY OF THE MLK AND THE 10TH STREET AREA. UM THE REGULATING PLAN RECOMMENDS A FEW CHANGES TO WHERE ZONING CATEGORIES ARE. THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR IS IMPORTANT. UM WE HEARD OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. THE EAST. STEWART IS A NEIGHBORHOOD AND THAT RESIDENTIAL IS THE IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. UM AND THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES HAVE BEEN REALLY THE, UM, STABILITY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO RIGHT NOW, THIS THIS PROPERTY RIGHT HERE, THERE WAS A BIG DESIRE TO BRING THAT BACK INTO WHAT'S CALLED THE S F, D, OR THE SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX DESIGNATION BECAUSE BEFORE IT HAD THIS DESIGNATION, WHICH IS CALLED G R O GENERAL RESIDENTIAL OFFICE. SO WE WANTED TO HONOR THAT, UM, DESIRE. AND ABOUT THE STREETS ALREADY. THIS IS THE THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS, AND YOU'LL NOTE THAT, UNLIKE A TYPICAL ZONING MAP, THIS HAS A FEW EXTRA FEATURES TO LET EVERYBODY KNOW THE IMPORTANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE AREA, INCLUDING CIVIC SITES AND THE EXISTING PONDS AND STORM WATER FEATURES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

SAME THING WITH THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN. THIS IDENTIFIES, UM, OPPORTUNITIES UNIMPROVED RIGHT OF WAYS. UM, AND THE NETWORK OF STREETS AND SOME RECOMMENDATIONS THERE. THIS IS THE ZONING RECOMMENDATION CHART AND AGAIN, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT WHEN WE TRY TO SIMPLIFY THIS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, SO IT'S AS EASY AS POSSIBLE TO COMPARE IT APPLES TO APPLES AND, UM, HOPEFULLY IT'S LEGIBLE HERE WILL BE POSTING THESE CHARTS ONTO THE LANDING PAGE. THAT PANEL MENTIONED ALREADY SO THAT THEY'RE ACCESSIBLE TO EVERYONE. AH, UM. THESE, UM MOST OF THE STANDARDS CARRY THROUGH, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE DENSITY REMAINS THE SAME BETWEEN WHAT IS THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DENSITY AND THE PROPOSED OF SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX THE HEIGHTS ARE MADE ARE CONSISTENT WITH TWO STORIES. ALTHOUGH WE DID BUMP UP THE HEIGHT OF THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT, AND THAT'S TO REFLECT MODERN BUILDING STANDARDS. UM YOU KNOW, IN THE 19 FIFTIES AND THE 19 SEVENTIES, IT WAS VERY IT WAS TYPICAL TO HAVE NOT ONLY SHORTER. AH, UM FLORIDA CEILING HEIGHTS, BUT ALSO YOU DIDN'T HAVE THE SAME BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS AS FAR AS INSULATION AND, UM, THE ROOF PITCHES TO SHED WATER. IT'S THIS ALLOWS FOR A LITTLE BIT MORE SPACE FOR THOSE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, BUT ALSO FOR THE MODERN BUILDING CODES. AH WE

[01:20:02]

ALSO SIMPLIFIED THE SETBACKS. SO THAT'S A IN HERE. YOU'LL KNOW THAT SOME OF THE SIP ACTS ARE REDUCED, PARTICULARLY THE REAR STEP BACK AND SOME MORE FLEXIBILITY INTO THE FRONT SETBACKS. AND THAT ALLOWS FOR MORE BUILDING AREA. UM THE E. STEWART HOUSES PLOTS ARE VERY SMALL. UM SO THE SETBACKS HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON WHERE THEY'RE THE BUILDABLE AREA. SO UM, SO THOSE ALLOWED FOR THAT, AND IT'S ALSO MORE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THE HISTORIC FABRIC IS WHEN YOU LOOK AT SOME OF THE HISTORIC HOMES IN EAST STEWART, THEY ARE YOU TYPICALLY 10 FT.

AWAY FROM THE FRONT OF THE STREET, NOT 20. FT. 20 FT IS A MUCH MORE TYPICAL SETBACK FOR, UM YOU KNOW, MORE LARGER PLANTED , UH, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THESE THESE ARE LIKE LOTS ARE USUALLY THAT'S AT THE SMALLEST THERE ABOUT 100 BY 36. THIS PROVIDES FOR MORE SPACE FOR THOSE UNITS. UM AND WE ALSO WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS OR OUTBUILDINGS THAT ALLOW FOR GENERATIONAL LIVING, AND THIS ALLOWS THOSE TO BE BUILT IN THE REAR MORE EASILY. UM AGAIN FOR THE G R O BRINGING A LOT OF THOSE HEIGHTS CONSISTENT THROUGH THE DENSITY.

WE DID ACKNOWLEDGE THE 17TH DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. UM THAT'S PERMITTED WITHIN THE COM PLANT AND BROUGHT THAT THROUGH. UM IT'S WHAT'S PERMITTED IN THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. AND THAT'S BECAUSE IF YOU BUILD ON EACH ONE OF THESE PLANTED LOTS OF RECORD IN EAST STUART, YOU'RE MUCH CLOSER TO 17 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. UM AND AGAIN, THAT'S JUST A YOU KNOW. YOU PUT ONE SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON EACH. PLATT. YOU'RE AT 17 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. UM SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S ACKNOWLEDGED IN THOSE THOSE LIKE ZONING REGULATIONS. AND VERY SIMILARLY. HERE WE ALLOW FOR THE AGAIN AND THEN A LITTLE MORE HEIGHT TO ALLOW FOR THE REALITIES OF BUILDING TODAY IN THE FACT THAT YOU NEED MORE OF THAT SPACE FOR YOUR H V. A C.

THE INSULATION BUILT ADHERING TO FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. UM I ALSO WANT TO NOTE YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THIS IS A PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL AREA. UM WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL TO ABOUT WHAT FOLKS HAVE PERMITTED RIGHTS TO TODAY. SO ONE OF THE, UM, ELEMENTS YOU'LL NOTE THAT HAS CHANGED IS THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE FOR FOUR STORIES HAS BEEN STRENGTHENED BECAUSE WE WANT TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE SURE THAT WHENEVER A FOUR STORY HEIGHT IS COMING FORWARD THAT IT HAS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF THAT COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND OUTREACH ELEMENT. UM, WE HEARD A LOT OF CONCERN ABOUT FOUR STORIES BEING BUILT IN EAST STEWART. SO WE'VE KEYED IN THIS EXTRA LAYER OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH THAT NEEDS TO BE ACHIEVED AS PART OF THAT. UM WE INTRODUCED FRONTAGE TYPES NOW, FRONTAGE TYPES ARE MY FAVORITE PIECE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. UM AND YOU DON'T HEAR VERY MANY PEOPLE TALK ABOUT THEIR FAVORITE PARTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. SO UM, THESE ARE MY FAVORITE BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT PROMOTES A SENSE OF COMMUNITY A SENSE OF SMALL TOWN CHARM. THESE ARE THE ELEMENTS THAT KEEP, UM BROUGHT A PROJECT FROM BEING A BEAR FACADE TO ITS STREET. IT HELPS PROMOTE ACTIVE SIDEWALKS. UM WE TALKED WE HEARD EARLIER. THE TERM FEET ON THE STREET. AND THESE ARE WHAT HELPS KEEP. UM THOSE THOSE PLACES ENGAGED AND VISIBLE AND SAFE AS THESE FRONTAGE TYPES. SO INSIDE THE FRONTAGE PIPES YOU DON'T NEED TO ADHERE TO THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLES HERE, BUT YOU DO HAVE TO ADHERE TO SOME OF THE DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA THAT'S OUT LAID. UM AND BECAUSE THOSE DIMENSIONAL CRITERIAS HAVE PURPOSE, RIGHT, UM THE PORCH NEEDS TO BE DEEP ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE CAN ACTUALLY OCCUPY IT. IT'S NOT JUST FOR AN AESTHETIC EFFECT. UM YOU NEED TO HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF WINDOWS AND OPENINGS WITHIN THE PROJECT. NOW WE HAVE RECEIVED PUBLIC COMMENT ABOUT CONCERNS ABOUT HOW DO YOU ADDRESS PORCHES THAT ARE RAISED OFF THE GROUND AND 88 ACCESSIBILITY AND WE REALLY WANT TO BE SENSITIVE TO THIS ISSUE, BECAUSE, UM, WE ALL WANT TO AGE IN PLACE. WE ALL HEARD A LOT ABOUT, UM, THE CONCERNS ABOUT AFFORDABILITY, AND THERE'S NOTHING MORE AFFORDABLE THAN THE HOME YOU ALREADY OWN. UM SO WE WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS, UM, SO WE WERE. WE'VE BEEN REACHED OUT TO BY THE LOCAL A CHAPTER AND WE ARE VERY EXCITED TO WORK WITH SHOP WITH EVERYONE THERE ABOUT WHAT ARE THE RIGHT MECHANISMS TO GET THROUGH THAT? UM BUT YOU'LL SEE THAT AGAIN. THIS IS A HARMONY STEWART. IT'S JUST GOT RE WINDOWED. THEY'RE THEY'RE REFURBISHING IT. IT'S GOT THAT LOVELY CONDITION OF BEING UP OFF THE GROUND, WHICH HELPED MITIGATES UM, WATER. AND YOU KNOW, THE CITY OF STEWART ALREADY HAS SOME REALLY GREAT POLICIES ABOUT HOW TO NOT SHED WATER ON OUR NEIGHBORS, SO WE WANT TO ENHANCE THAT. UM WE ALSO HAVE BUILDING TYPES AND

[01:25:04]

INTRODUCED IN THE YEAH EAST STEWART NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THOSE ARE KEYED IN ABOVE. THESE ARE QUICK EXAMPLES OF WHAT THOSE CAN LOOK LIKE AGAIN. REALLY KEYING IN THAT WE WANT TO MAINTAIN WHAT'S THE CHARACTER TODAY IN EAST STEWART AS REDEVELOPMENT HAPPENS, OR AS INFILL DEVELOPMENT HAPPENS, EVEN MORE SO IMPORTANT? UM BECAUSE WE DO HAVE VACANT LOTS WITHIN E.

STEWART UM, GLOSSED OVER THIS BECAUSE OF WHEN WE WENT OVER THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BUT ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FEATURES OF WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING IN THE CODE IS THAT THIS BE EMU SO EVERYWHERE. MIDDLE BACK TO THE MAP. SO ALL OF THESE AREAS IN THIS BRIGHT PINK RIGHT? SO THIS IS MLK. THIS IS EAST. UM THEY THIS IS LAKE ALONG HERE RIGHT NOW. YOU'RE NOT PERMITTED TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. UM IT MUST BE A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT WITH WITH A COMMERCIAL COMPONENT . SO WE WANT TO RECTIFY THAT. UM THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD AND WE WANT TO HAVE A FLEXIBILITY OF BUILDING TYPES WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO IN ADDITION TO THE COMMERCIAL THAT IS PERMITTED TODAY, WE ALSO WANT TO PERMIT THOSE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TO COME INTO THIS AREA AS WELL. AND THEN AGAIN, THE BUILDING TYPES. ARE REALLY IMPORTANT FOR ILLUSTRATING WHAT THE EXPECTATIONS ARE, UM, WIN CERTAIN BUILDING TYPES COME ONLINE. YOU KNOW, A DUPLEX DOESN'T HAVE TO LOOK LIKE A DUPLEX WITH WITHOUT A PORCH. YOU CAN HAVE A PORCH. YOU CAN HAVE CHARACTER. YOU CAN ACHIEVE PARKING IN THE REAR PARKING ON THE SIDE. WE INTRODUCE A COTTAGE COURT, WHICH IS A BUILDING TYPE THAT ALLOWS FOR A SERIES OF, UM SINGLE FAMILY HOMES OR A SERIES OF SMALL COTTAGES ON A PLANET LOT. APARTMENT HOUSES, WHICH INCLUDE, UM LOW DENSITY, BUT MULTI UNIT, UH, LIVING WITHIN, UM WITHIN THAT FABRIC, AND AGAIN, THOSE ARE ONLY PERMITTED WITHIN WHAT'S TODAY CALLED THE G, R O AND B M U, AND THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE PERMITTED TODAY, TOO. SO NO CHANGE. JUST THE ILLUSTRATIONS. UM AND THEY THESE FRONTAGE TYPE SUPPLIED. SO THAT'S THE END OF THE EAST STEWART PRESENTATION. UM, DO UM , MAYOR. WOULD YOU LIKE TO PAUSE FOR QUESTIONS HERE? KEEP GOING. QUESTIONS ON THE EAST STEWART PRESENTATION BEFORE SHE GOES TO CREEK. UM, ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A FEW I HAVE SOME, TOO. COMMISSIONER CLARK WENT AHEAD AND START OKAY, I'M GONNA START WITH MR MORE TILL SO, UM, SO I KNOW THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LITTLE BIT. I'VE TALKED TO HER. I MET WITH HER AND MET WITH SOME RESIDENTS. UH MORE INTERESTED, BUT, UM I KNOW SHE MENTIONED, UH ABOUT, YOU KNOW, HAVING A GROUP THAT WOULD HELP TO ADVISE LIKE THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR SOMETHING. I KNOW THAT I HAVE BROUGHT THIS UP BEFORE WHEN I TRIED TO BRING UP THAT, UM OH, HISTORIC DESIGNATION DISTRICT AREA AND TO HAVE SOME TYPE OF ADVISER BORDER OMBUDSMAN BOARD FROM EAST STEWART TO REALLY TALK ABOUT ISSUES AND WHAT CONCERNS OF PEOPLE AND HOW THINGS WOULD BE, UM, ALMOST LIKE SOMEWHAT APPROVED IN THERE BASED ON GUIDELINES, AND I KNOW THAT SHE MENTIONED ACES. AND WE HAVE THE CRB AND WE HAVE THE L. PA WHICH IS A PART OF OUR ZONING AND LAND USE DESIGNATION THAT GOES THROUGH WITH THE CITY COMMISSION AND S IS NOT ONE OF THOSE ORGANIZATIONS. IT IS A COMMUNITY GROUP. IT MAY OR MAY NOT EXIST FROM TIME TO TIME. AND UM, SO, MR MORTAL, SINCE THIS HAS COME UP AGAIN, UM HAVING THE CORD AND IF WE APPROVE ACCORD THIS PARTICULAR THING FOR EAST STEWART, UM DO WE NEED TO LOOK INTO HAVING AH, GROUP THAT'S ALMOST LIKE AN ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY GROUP OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT WOULD GIVE THE THAT WOULD BE SAID THAT WOULD HAVE HAVE THEM BE THE ADVISORS OR THE COMMITTEE. OR WOULD WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH OUR REGULAR CRB FOR CERTAIN THINGS BASED ON WHAT ARE CURRENT GUIDELINES IS HAS TO GO TO THE CRB AND ALSO WHAT GOES TO THE L P A. IN TERMS OF LAND, USE ZONING CHANGES OR COME UM, PLAN CHANGES. I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP BECAUSE IT'S NOT JUST A CASUAL THING OF HAVING SOME ORGANIZATION JUST TALKED TO THE DIRECTOR. THE REALITY OF IT IS, IS THAT WHEN YOU ADOPT OF WHEN YOU ADOPT A FORM BASED CODE, OR FOR THAT MATTER, ANY CODE. IT SHOULD NOT BE YOUR INTENTION TO HAVE LAND USE CHANGES. YOU SHOULD RELY ON THE PLANNING OF THIS IS THE LAND USE, AND THIS IS THE CODE FOR A LONG TERM RELATES TO ANY BOARD WHETHER IT'S L P A OR EVEN THE CITY COMMISSION. WE SHOULDN'T

[01:30:06]

ANTICIPATE MAKING A BUNCH OF LAND USE CHANGES. WE SHOULD ANTICIPATE LOCKING IT IN AND SAYING WE'RE GOING TO TRY AND KEEP IT THIS WAY. IT'S ALSO MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FORM BASED CODE BEING PRESENTED IS INTENDED TO ALLEVIATE THE NEED FOR DEVIATION OR ACCEPTANCES TO CODE AND AS A RESULT IS GOING TO PROMOTE ESSENTIALLY STRAIGHT PERMIT DEVELOPMENT. IF THAT WERE THE CASE. THERE WOULD BE NO REVIEW BOARD. NO CRB. NO L P A NO CITY COMMISSION. IT WOULD BE WANTS TO BUILD HIS HOUSE. HE LOOKS AT THE PICTURES JESSICA PUT UP THERE. WALKS INTO THE CITY HALL AND SAYS, HERE'S MY DEVELOPMENT PAPERS, YOU KNOW, BUT I'VE DRAWN UP TO BUILD MY HOUSE. I'D LIKE A PERMIT FOR ONE, YOU KNOW, LINE NUMBER SEVEN. I WANT ONE OF THOSE AND THEY ISSUE THE PERMANENT. GO ON. HOWEVER AS IT RELATES TO THIS POLICY ISSUE THAT YOU'RE ADDRESSING THE CITY AS A POLICY PRIOR TO THE ADOPTION OF OR IN COORDINATION WITH THE ADOPTION OF IT. COULD INCLUDE. AN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF WHAT IS GOING TO BE APPROVED. I KNOW BECAUSE I SAT HERE ONE SATURDAY FOR MANY HOURS, WHILE JESSICA AND PANEL SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH A LARGE E STEWART GROUP THAT WAS INTERESTED ENOUGH TO COME AND ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS , AND IT WAS A VERY ENGAGING CONVERSATION. ABOUT WHAT PUT CODER COULDN'T GO THERE. ONCE THE BOOK THE FORM IS ADOPTED, THOUGH IT WOULD NOT BE A SITUATION THAT EACH ITEM WOULD GO THROUGH. HOWEVER WE COULD CREATE A SCENARIO WHERE THE C R A HAS A MONTHLY UPDATE OR A AGENDA ITEM THAT HAS JUST A BRIEF REVIEW OF WHAT THE FORM BASED CODE IS DOING AND WHAT IT MEANS AND HOW IT'S PROGRESSING AND THINGS LIKE THAT SO THAT MEMBERS OF WHATEVER COMMUNITY WOULD BE MORE THAN WELCOME TO COME IN AND INTERACT AND FEEL A CONNECTION TO IT. OKAY BE SOMETHING YOU COULD INCLUDE. IF I CAN ADD TO. I MEAN, SO PART OF WHAT IS DIFFERENT ABOUT THIS CODE, RIGHT IS THAT WE PUT A LOT MORE ATTENTION TO SOME OF THE MECHANISMS LIKE THE FRONTAGE STANDARDS SO THAT THERE ARE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES THAT ARE PART OF THE PROJECT RIGHT FROM THE GET GO, BUT THERE ARE SOME STANDARDS RIGHT AT AARON AND PERMITTED USES THAT ARE THEREBY CONDITIONAL USE. SO THOSE ARE THE OR IF IT IS A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT THAT IS GOING TO GO FOR SOMETHING THAT WANTS SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF THE BOX. THAT IS WHEN A DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MAKI INTO WHAT IS THE ACTIVE COMMUNITY GROUP FOR E. STEWART AT THAT TIME, AND THEN WHAT THE LANGUAGE IS, IS THAT IT ? I THINK I HAVE IT AND AHEAD OF US, TOO, IS THAT IT? REQUESTS THAT THAT PROJECT? NO, IT'S OUT THERE. BUT REQUESTED THAT PROJECT THEN BE PRESENTED, UM, THAT APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO GO THROUGH THE EFFORT OF DOING THAT OUTREACH. IN ADDITION TO EVERYTHING THAT THE CITY ALREADY REQUIRES, LIKE THE CRB MEETING, THE LP A MEETING AND THE CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS, SO IT'S ABOUT ENGAGING EARLIER ON WITH THE COMMUNITY. IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO DO SOMETHING THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN THE CODE. RIGHT? SO ANYTHING THAT WOULD REQUEST A P U D MAYBE MAYBE SOMETHING THAT DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MAY WANT TO, UM, GET AHEAD OF THAT OUTREACH WITH THAT KIND OF A PROJECT. UM AND THEN ALONG THE SAME LINES, UM, I DON'T KNOW.

YOU MENTIONED ALSO THE HISTORIC DESIGNATION, SO PUT OFF BALANCE WHEN ALL DANNY SAUNDERS UM, UPDATE YOU WITH THAT? I THINK. YEAH. SO UM WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF DESIGNATING EAST GEORGIA HISTORIC HISTORIC DISTRICT AND WE HAVE SUBMITTED PRELIMINARY SITE. IT'S CALLED PRELIMINARY SITE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.

THEY'RE REVIEWING THE THAT RIGHT NOW AND ONCE, UM THEY DETERMINED THAT IT CAN BE DESIGNATED WILL GO THROUGH ANOTHER PROCESS OF ACTUALLY GIVING THAT DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICT. THANKS AND THAT WILL SERVE TO REALLY KEEP THAT SENSE OF PLACE AND HAVE PEOPLE KNOW THAT THEY CAN BE THERE AND REMAIN THERE HAVE THAT TYPE OF HOUSING THAT ITS HISTORICAL AND TRADITIONALLY BEFORE, EVEN IF THERE ARE OTHER THINGS, MR MR MAYOR, CAN I JUST CONTINUE? I WANT I HOPE I WON'T BE LONG. I KNOW THAT I'VE BEEN ON THE COMMISSION ALMOST 12 YEARS. AND I THINK ABOUT THE LAND USER, MAYBE BECAUSE THE SCHOOL BOARD IS ALL ONTO ITS OWN SELF LIKE A LITTLE. NOT A FAITH THEM WITH SOMETHING. SCHOOL WORKS ON THIS SONG. SORRY BUT, UM, YEAH, BUT YOU KNOW, THEY'VE NEVER COME IN FOR ANY CHANGES, BUT I'M SURPRISED THAT MAYBE IT HASN'T JUST COME UP THAT IN OUR CITY THAT PARTICULAR PROPERTY WAS NEVER DESIGNATED GOVERNMENT OR INSTITUTIONAL FOR THE SPECTRUM ACADEMY, WHICH IS ALL TRADITIONS. STEWART TRAINING SCHOOL 1933. TWO THROUGH 1939.

SOMETIME ABOUT THAT TIME IT WAS ESTABLISHED, AND I'M JUST SURPRISED THAT IT WAS NEVER.

[01:35:01]

WHAT IS THE CURRENT DESIGNATION ON THAT? THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND YOU, SUSIE STEWART. NOW IT'S JUST IT'S JUST IT CAN BE E. STEWART SCHOOLS AND THOSE USES ARE PERMITTED THERE. BUT IT'S HELPFUL WHEN WE AND ANALYZE OUR FUTURE LAND. USE THAT WE HAVE REALLY ACCURATE LOOK AT WHAT IS PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL ABILITY TO REALLY GET A BETTER NUMBERS ON WHAT'S WHAT'S ON THE GROUND AND ALSO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IF LET'S SAY, LIKE GERTRUDE WALLEN WERE TO BE INCLUDED. IF WE APPROVE THAT, THEN IN THE FUTURE IF THIS DAYCARE IS NOT THERE WHATEVER. AT LEAST IT'S A LAND USE. THAT'S AH. GOVERNMENT OR SOMETHING USED SO THAT IT TAKES ANOTHER PROCESS IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO BUY IT UP AND USE IT FOR RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL OR SOMETHING SO AGAIN, THIS IS THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY HELP TO MAINTAIN CHARACTER OF THE ERA THAT THESE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE IN THIS PARTICULAR DISTRICT AND WILL HOPEFULLY REMAIN LIKE THAT IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU FOR THAT RESPONSE. ON THE SALVATION ARMY. OKAY SO MY QUESTION IS, UM, WHEN WE HAD SOME QUESTIONS BEFORE ABOUT THE STEWART AND EVEN ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD, THERE WERE SOME RESIDENTS. I THINK EAST OF UM CORTEZ AVENUE TOWARDS PALM BEACH ROAD. WHO HAVE? I THINK IF I HOPE I'M NOT MISTAKEN, BUT I THINK THAT THEY CAME IN AND SAID THAT BASICALLY NORTH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING IS TECHNICALLY WE DON'T WANT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE STEWART. SOME PEOPLE WANTED TO BE INCLUDED IN STUART. SOME PEOPLE WANT TO BE INCLUDED STEWART AND THE ISSUE IS WHERE DOES THE E STEWART BORDER STAY? DOES IT STAY TO A CERTAIN LEVEL NORTH AND SOUTH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD? AS A AS A LIMIT. LET'S SAY 200 FT. NORTH OF BOTTLE OF THE KING AS A CORRIDOR , OR DOES IT JUST STAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MARTIN LUTHER KING? THAT'S I'M JUST PUTTING THAT OUT THERE BECAUSE I KNOW THAT THAT HAS COME UP AS A QUESTION, UM WHEN WE WERE DOING THE NEW DEVELOPMENT ALONG MARTIN LUTHER KING WITH THOSE SIX HOMES THAT GO ALL THE WAY BACK TO SIXTH STREET OR FIFTH STREET. AND THAT CAME UP THAT SOME PEOPLE WERE CONSIDERED AND WELL, ALL WE IN EAST STEWART OR ARE WE NORTH IF WE'RE NORTH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING WHERE WE ARE, AND I KNOW THAT YOU MENTIONED THE SALVATION ARMY BUILDING IN TERMS OF ALSO DESIGNATION. UM UH AND I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP BETWEEN THAT CORE DESIGNATION.

UM WHEN WE ASKED FOR THE HISTORIC DID THAT DESIGNATION OF E. STEWART WHERE DO WE GO WITH THE CORRIDOR OF MARTIN LUTHER KING IN TERMS OF NORTH AND SOUTH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BOULEVARD? NOT EVEN CAME UP EARLIER WHEN WE MENTIONED SOME PEOPLE IN THEIR COMMENTS MENTIONED ABOUT THE BUILDINGS ALONG THE THAT THAT, UM, WHERE THE PUBLIC WORKS, GARAGES AND, UM, I KNOW IT ALSO CAME UP WHEN WE HAD THE BALL PARK. ISSUES SOME YEARS AGO. AND WHAT IS HE STEWART AND WHAT IS NOT E. STEWART NORTH AND SOUTHERN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN LOOK AT AND THINK ABOUT. I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT UP. YOU DON'T YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER IT, UM, COULD ANSWER SOMETHING. YOU'RE OKAY. WE ARE GOING TO BE DOING A SURVEY OF OUR DOWNTOWN AND EAST STEWART. UH TO SEE WHICH PROPERTIES WOULD QUALIFY THE HISTORIC STRUCTURE. WE'RE GOING TO BE UPDATING OUR SURVEY NEXT YEAR, AND THAT WILL KIND OF GIVE US AN IDEA OF HOW TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARY OR DO WE KEEP THE EXISTING EASTER BOUNDARIES, SO THAT SURVEY IS IMPORTANT AND WE CAN PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION ONCE IT'S COMPLETED. OKAY? AND THEN BACK AGAIN TO MR MOORE TELL AND OR PLANNER. PLANNERS. UM. THIS IDEA OF THE COMPLAINT WITH THE 30 DWELLING UNITS IN THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, DESIGNATION OF LAND USE, BUT THE ACTUAL ZONING ON THERE NOW, WHICH I THINK THE ZONING IS THE EAST STEWART ZONE IN, UM WITH A 17 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. AND IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO COME IN, LIKE ALONG 10 STREET WHERE WE HAVE THE OLD TALE OF PROPERTY AND WANTED TO COME IN WITH A P, U D OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THAT THAT MAY FALL SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THE 17 AND 30 UNITS, UM AH, HOW DO WE BALANCE THAT? AND WHEN WE APPROVED THIS, UM NEW CHANGE? IS THERE ANY ROOM FOR THAT TYPE OF, UM BALANCE, MR MARTEL. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THEY'VE INCLUDED THE OPTION FOR THE COMMISSION TO HEAR THE U. D S SO WILL NOT IMPACT THAT AT ALL. JUST WOULD BE A HIGHER STANDARD THAT THE COMMISSION WOULD HOLD THE APPLICANT TO SO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE WHAT THE BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY WOULD BE FOR DEVIATING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I JUST WANT AGAIN. I JUST WANT TO BRING THESE THINGS UP. UM EAST AVENUE . OF COURSE YOU'VE COVERED THAT VERY WELL THAT THAT PINK AREA

[01:40:01]

THAT PEOPLE HAVE ALWAYS SAID THAT THAT'S AN ERA. THAT'S UH I CALL IT LIVE WORK. SO YOU HAVE HOUSING ABOVE. WE'VE HAD AN ALL FORMER DRUG STORE THAT USED TO BE THERE. THAT WAS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I THINK TOOK THAT DOWN AND TOOK DOWN OTHER BUILDINGS. UM, AS FIRE PRACTICED MANY YEARS AGO, BUT THAT WAS THE WHOLE THING ABOUT THAT AVENUE WAS TO HAVE PLACES ABOVE WHERE YOU LIVE, AND YOU HAVE A BUSINESS DOWNSTAIRS AND IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT THAT BECAUSE OF THE WAY THAT ZONING WAS OR IS NOW SORRY THAT NO SINGLE FAMILY COULD BE DONE ON EAST AVENUE AND IN ANY OF THOSE PINK AREAS, SO IF WE WANT TO HAVE MORE SINGLE FAMILY EARLY IN THE AREA. WE HAVE TO CREATE THE TYPE OF ZONING AND LAND USE THAT NOW WILL OFFER MORE. OPPORTUNITIES TO HAVE FLEXIBILITY AND DO CERTAIN THINGS. SO UM, I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I BRING THAT UP AND BRING IT OUT SO THAT THOSE WHO ARE HEARING AND LISTENING AND THOSE WHO ARE GOING TO COME OUT ON THE 11TH UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CHARACTER OF EITHER WHAT'S BEEN CHANGED OR WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THAT AREA, AND THAT HAS ALL MULTI HERE THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING THAT THEY DON'T WANT APARTMENTS AND THEIR APARTMENTS ALONG THAT AREA RIGHT NOW, AND THAT'S BEEN THE LIFEBLOOD. OF THE COMMUNITY, AND THE COMMUNITY IS LOOKING FORWARD TO DEVELOP CERTAIN THINGS. WHETHER THEY'RE FOUR STORIES OR LESS, BUT THAT'S SOMETHING I'M GOING TO GO ON TO MY NEXT COMMENT YOU DID MENTION , AND I DON'T I DIDN'T PULL UP MY PAGE, BUT IT MIGHT BE PAGE 34 SOMETHING. BUT YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THE HEIGHTS AND THAT YOU KNOW THE HEIGHTS HAVE BEEN A LITTLE BIT INCREASE IN ORDER BECAUSE OF THEIR CERTAIN THINGS , BUT NOTHING IN THAT HEIGHT IN NUMBER OF FEET, IS ABOVE FOUR STORIES CORRECT AND FORCE TOWARDS AGAIN. WE ALWAYS HAVE TURRETS AND OTHER THINGS. IS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT THAT THAT MAKES CHANGES. IN ADDITION, SO AN AVERAGE OF 45 48 FT. SOMETHING LIKE THAT. BUT I JUST WANTED TO BE SURE THAT WHEN YOU SAID THE HEIGHTS HAVE BEEN INCREASED THAT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANYTHING ABOUT FOUR STORES . I'M JUST JUST I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP. UM THOROUGH FEARS THOROUGHFARES WHEN YOU BROUGHT THAT UP IN THE PAST, THERE HAS BEEN SOME TALK ABOUT TAKEN TAKING THE LEG OUT OF 10TH STREET AND TAKING IT STRAIGHT ACROSS THROUGH PROBABLY WHAT IS NOW THE REST OF THE TAILOR PROPERTY ALL THE WAY TO THE RAILROAD TRACK. UM BEYOND JUST SOUTH OF THE STUART COMMUNITY GARDEN. AND IF YOU HAVE AN AERIAL OR NOT, BUT SO TO TAKE THE LEG OUT OF YOUR THAT'S RIGHT , 10TH STREET AND THAT HAS BEEN SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP HAS BEEN KIND OF DROPPED IN OUR THOROUGHFARE, PLANNING OR COMPLAINING. UM, I KNOW THAT WE'RE GONNA BE TALKING AT THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING ABOUT POSSIBLY FUTURE COMPLAINING AND OTHER THINGS. AND I DON'T KNOW.

UM, THIS IS PROBABLY NOT THE TIME BECAUSE THIS IS A CODE, UM , TYPE UPDATE, BUT, UM, OF COURSE OPPORTUNITY, MAYBE THERE IF IT WERE EVER NEEDED TO MAKE THAT STRAIGHT ACROSS, IN FACT, THAT EVEN CAME UP THE OTHER DAY WHEN PEOPLE WERE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE RAILROAD TRACK AND HOW THEY THOUGHT THAT THE FLORIDA STREET WAS CONSTRAINED. AT A ONE A AND WHETHER OR NOT THERE COULD BE SOMETHING WIDER OR BETTER, UM , YOU KNOW THAT WE JUST THOUGHT THAT THERE ARE LOTS OF ISSUES GOING ON THERE BECAUSE IF YOU HAVE AN INTERSECTION AT FLORIDA STREET AND A ONE ENDED AN INTERSECTION FOR THE LESS THAN A THIRD OF A MILE TO THE SOUTH OF IT, THERE ARE ALL KINDS OF THINGS GOING ON THERE, BUT I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP. UM YOU WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT EXISTING THOROUGHFARES AND THEIR ABILITY TO FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE POTENTIAL CODE IS THAT WELL, THERE'S A FEW THINGS THAT THIS DOES WANTED IDENTIFIES WHERE WE HAVE UNDER UNIMPROVED RIGHT OF WAYS BECAUSE IT'S DIFFICULT TO LOOK AT A ZONING MAPS. SOMETIMES IF YOU DON'T HAVE THAT AREA IN FRONT OF YOU AND IDENTIFY WHERE YOUR ACTUAL CONNECTIONS ARE AND HOW PEOPLE GET PLACES OR KEY TO YOU KNOW HOW HOW THE CITY WORKS RIGHT, SO AND IT ALSO REMINDS US THAT WE HAVE CERTAIN ASSETS WITHIN OUR, UM, OUR AREA AS A CITY, UM, THAT CAN SERVE ANOTHER PURPOSE OR, UM, BE, YOU KNOW, MAYBE THEY HAVEN'T NEVER THERE FOR AMBITION, BUT THAT'S IT'S JUST SO WE CAN KEEP A RECORD OF WHAT WHAT'S THERE WITH US ASSETS ARE AND ALSO TO MAINTAIN FUTURE CAN YOU KNOW AND ENCOURAGE FUTURE CONNECTIONS? BECAUSE IF YOU SPEND ANY TIME IN EAST STUART, THIS COMMUNITY IS, UM, HAS EMBRACED ITS SIDEWALKS. THERE'S LOTS OF PEOPLE WALKING AND BIKING AND USING GO KARTS AND YOU KNOW, A WHOLE HOST OF MOBILITY IN THIS AREA, SO THE SIDEWALKS THOSE CONNECTIONS ARE KEY TO GET PEOPLE TO JOB CENTERS TO THEIR SCHOOLS. UM SO WE WANNA ELEVATE THOSE IMPORTANCE IN THE CODE. OKAY THANK YOU. MR UM, MAYOR, I'M GONNA FINISH IN A

[01:45:02]

MINUTE. GOOD THING THAT YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THE SIDEWALKS BECAUSE, UM, SO THE FRONT PORCHES ARE IMPORTANT. AND YOU MENTIONED ABOUT MOST OF THE HOUSES THAT ARE EXISTING ON I THINK OF TARP ON AVENUE AS AN EXAMPLE A LOT OF THE HOMES OR LESS THAN 10 FT. EVEN THE PUBLIC HOUSING THAT'S ON CHURCH STREET AND OTHER PLACES LESS THAN 10 FT FROM THE SIDEWALK. AND I CAN'T REMEMBER. I HAVE MY THING MARKED UP HERE. BUT I CAN'T REMEMBER IF YOU HAVE NOT PUT ANY. UM, IN IN THOSE, UM SORROW FEARS. YOU KNOW WHERE YOU PUT THE FURNISHINGS AND WHAT GOES. WHERE DID YOU SAY OR WRITE OUT SPECIFICALLY? OR CAN YOU JUST SAY THAT AND LET THE PUBLIC KNOW IF YOU'RE SAYING THAT THERE'S A MINIMUM OF 15 FT . 25 FT 10 FT OR EVERYTHING THAT'S IN PLACE, OF COURSE, STAYS IN PLACE. BUT WHEN SOMETHING NEW COMES IN UM THAT BETWEEN YOU MENTIONED ABOUT LANDSCAPE IN BETWEEN THE HOME, OKAY. I'M SORRY. I DON'T HAVE MY PAGE NUMBERS. BUT STEWART, THERE'S VERY I MEAN, ANY STEWART NEIGHBORHOOD, THERE'S A MUCH MORE CONSTRAINED RIGHT OF WAY.

SO MOST OF THOSE RIGHT AWAYS ARE ONLY ABOUT 40. FT UM, THERE ARE SOME OPPORTUNITIES WHERE THEY'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT MORE RIGHT OF WAY. SO WE ILLUSTRATED SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS. NOW THESE ARE TOOLS FOR FOLKS IF DEVELOPMENT COMES INTO SOME OF THESE LARGER PROPERTIES WHERE THEY CAN, THE STAFF CAN POINT TO THE THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS AND SET EXPECTATIONS FOR WHAT THOSE THOSE FRONTAGE IS, SHOULD BE LIKE ALONG THE SIDEWALKS REGARDING APPROPRIATE LIGHTING APPROPRIATE, UH, SHADE TREES APPROPRIATE PARKING ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS. THEY REALLY DID. THERE'S A DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT THOSE THE SIDEWALKS ARE LIKE, UM, THERE IS A MINIMUM STANDARD FOR SIDEWALKS OF AT LEAST SIX FT OR IN THOSE AREAS IN THOSE THOROUGHFARES STANDARDS NOW FOR THE CREEK DISTRICT. IT GOES INTO A LOT MORE DETAIL. THERE IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT BECAUSE THOSE ARE WIDER RIGHT OF WAYS AND THERE'S MORE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY. SO YOU NEED TO ACCOMMODATE MORE THINGS ON THE SIDEWALKS, RIGHT SO UM, THESE CODES ARE VERY TAILORED TO THOSE SPECIFIC AREAS. THIS IS, YOU KNOW, UM EUCLIDEAN CLOSE CODES OR CONVENTIONAL CODES THEY GO REALLY MUCH MORE BROAD STROKED, AND THIS IS VERY SPECIFIC TO THOSE AREAS. SO THAT'S WHY THERE'S SO MANY ILLUSTRATIONS. THERE'S CHARTS AND THAT'S YOU KNOW, PART OF THE REASON WHY I TALKED SO LONG, SO OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THEN THEY, UM THE PORCH IS I KNOW THAT YOU HAD A LONG DISCUSSION ABOUT PEOPLE WANT AGENT PLACE, AND WHEN THESE AREAS ARE SO CLOSE TO THE SIDEWALK, HOW DO YOU GET IN THERE? RAISED ABOVE THE ROAD MORE THAN 18 INCHES. 21 INCHES, UH, UNDER 18 INCHES BASED ON THE R CODE, UM, WHERE THE HOW DO YOU GET ACCESSIBILITY FOR RAMPS AND HAVE IT AFFORDABLE FOR PEOPLE TO LIVE IN? AND IF THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A RAMP OR IF THEY'RE PUT IN A HABITAT HOME THAT REQUIRES AROUND TO BE BUILT IN AS A PART OF THE HABITAT HOME REQUIREMENTS. JUST GIVE US A LITTLE HIGHLIGHT ON THAT. SURE I MEAN, ONE OF THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY WE LOOK SO IN DEPTH INTO WHAT THESE SETBACKS ARE SO THAT THERE'S SPACE TO BUILD RAMPS WHEN THEY NEED TO BE SO THEY COULD BE ALONG THE SIDE IN THE FRONT OR THEY COULD BE ALONG IN THE REAR. IDEALLY IN THE FRONT OR THE SIDE. UM AND THEN WE'VE ALSO TALKED WITH THE SIERRA ABOUT ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING SOME OF THESE COSTS INCURRED IF THERE ARE ANY, UM, BUILT INTO THE FACADE GRANT PROGRAM, AND SO THAT'S ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY, ESPECIALLY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO MITIGATE SOME OF THE COSTS WHILE STILL MAINTAINING THAT FRONT PORCH CHARACTER AND ALLOWING PEOPLE TO AGE IN PLACE.

AND LIKE I SAID, WE'RE STILL IN CONVERSATIONS WITH FOLKS AT THE AI A. WHO'D HAVE REACHED OUT TO US ABOUT HOW TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE, SO WHEN WE COME BACK IN, PROBABLY IN ON OCTOBER 11TH OR DEFINITELY BEFORE WE GO BEFORE THE L P A WITH THE ADOPTION OF AN UPDATED DRAFT THAT REFLECTS THOSE THOSE COMMENTS. AND AS A MATTER OF CLARIFICATION, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE CODE IS.

UM THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY, IF, IN FACT A PERSON HAS A IDENTIFIABLE DISABILITY UNDER THE ADA. THEY'RE ENTITLED TO A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION AND AS A RESULT, IF SOMEONE WERE TO COME IN AND SAY, I CAN'T BUILD THE HOUSE I WANT TO BUILD BASED UPON THIS DIRECTION BECAUSE I NEED A WHEELCHAIR ACCESS THE CITY. COULD GRANT A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION AND WAVE THAT HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL HOME RATHER THAN HAVING THE ENTIRE CODE BE DISRUPTED BECAUSE THERE MIGHT BE ONE OR TWO HOMES IN THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAVE THAT DISCREPANCY. THE BETTER METHOD WOULD BE TO JUST HAVE THAT AVAILABLE AS A MEANS TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE INDIVIDUALS AS NECESSARY. WHETHER IT'S WHEELCHAIR OR BRAILLE, OR OR LIGHTING OR SOMETHING THAT BECAUSE OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENTS, ETCETERA TO INCLUDE IN THE COURT

[01:50:02]

ITSELF THAT WOULD BE REASONABLE. BASED ON A D A REQUIREMENTS AND ALL RESEMBLE THINGS. ABSOLUTELY AND EVERY HOME HAS TO. YOU KNOW THEY WILL EVERY COMMERCIAL PROJECT IN MULTI FAMILY NEED TO FOLLOW WITH A D. A. REALLY IT'S REALLY CONVERSATION ABOUT ANYBODY'S INDIVIDUAL HOMES IF THAT BECOMES AN ISSUE UM AND THEN AGAIN TO JUST REPEAT THAT THE EXISTING STANDARD THIS IS NOT JUST GEARED TOWARDS AN ATTRACTIVE FRONT PORCH. IT'S ALSO ABOUT BUILDING AND RESILIENCY TO THESE HOMES. SO THAT AS THE AS, UM YOU KNOW, ROADS GET REPAVED IN THE CROWN OF ROYAL COMES UP, UM, AS AS WATER EVENTS HAPPEN, UM, THERE'S ALREADY CODE STANDARDS IN PLACE THAT ARE PERMITTED TO PERMIT THE USE OF PHIL COMING IN TO RAISE THE BUILDINGS UP TO REACH THAT CROWN OF ROAD. UM YOU KNOW, WE CAN POINT TO A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES IN THE CITY WHERE HOMES AND COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN RAISED WITH FELL AND THAT EXACERBATES THE PROBLEMS OF WATER SHEDDING ONTO OUR NEIGHBORS, SO IT'S MUCH BETTER TO DO THAT WITH WITH STEM WALLS AND EXTENDED FOOTERS, AND AGAIN, THE CITY HAS ACTUALLY BEEN PROACTIVE ON THIS. THEY'VE ALREADY ADOPTED LANGUAGE THAT TALKS ABOUT INFILL, SO WE MAKE REFERENCE TO THAT. UM AND HOW THOSE METHODS CONSTRUCTION, UM, AGAIN HELPED TO PROMOTE A BETTER BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND MORE RESILIENT HOMES OVER TIME. SO IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT, UM, YOU KNOW, AN ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER . IT'S ALSO ABOUT BUILDING RESILIENCY INTO, UM IMPORTANT HOMES. OKAY AND I'M THE LAST 1 TO 2. MR MAYOR. OH THE LOTS THE LAST LOT SIZES. YOU'RE NOT RECOMMENDING THAT PEOPLE HAVE LARGE LOTS OF 300 FT WIDE AND THIS THAT EVERYTHING, WHATEVER PEOPLE HAVE WHATEVER THEIR LAND USES, DESIGNATED WHATEVER THEIR OWNERSHIP IS, THEY CAN WORK WITH IT WITHIN THE CODE, AND THEN THE NEXT THING IS THE LAND USE SECTION THAT YOU HAVE LISTED LIKE MUSEUMS, OR, UM, SHOPS OR CLUBS OR LOUNGES. WHATEVER IT IS , I REALLY LIKE, YOU KNOW, OF COURSE, THE LIST KIND OF COMPLIES WITH WHAT WE HAVE NOW, BUT I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN PEOPLE ARE REVIEWING THAT THEY LOOK AT SOMETHING. AND THEY SAY, OH, BOY, WE CAN'T EVER HAVE X IN THE EAST TO IT AREA AND IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIED OR LISTED, THAT'S EITHER IN OUR IN GENERAL , UM UNICODE, OR LISTED AS A PART OF THIS PROPOSED THE STUART UM, CALLED THAT PEOPLE KNOW THAT AND CHECK IT OUT AND LOOK AT IT. AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK. THANK YOU TAKING YOUR PAPER AWAY FROM THE NEXT SECTION. I HAVE MORE FOR THE FOR THE CREEK DISTRICT. GETTING NO. OKAY, SO, UH, COMMISSIONERS. I HAVE A FEW THINGS I OFFER YOU GUYS TO GO FIRST FOR ME. I'D LIKE TO SEE WHERE DENSITY IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD DOESN'T BECOME ITS OWN UNIQUE DESIGNATION WITH 17.

I KNOW IT'S KIND OF AN ECLECTIC ZONING RIGHT NOW IN EAST STEWART WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY AT 17, BUT FOR ME, I WOULDN'T WANT TO SEE THAT EXTEND TO ALL OF THE STUART TOWARDS ITS OWN ZONING.

UM I'D LIKE TO KEEP IT AS UNIFORM WITH THE REST OF THE CITY AT 15 AS POSSIBLE. THAT WAS ALL. MR. FIRST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO COMPLIMENT COMMISSIONER CLARK ON UNDERSTANDING THIS PRESENTATION. THIS IS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE HEARD THIS AND THE FIRST TIME I HEARD IT IN URBAN PLANNER BY TRADE. UM BUT YOUR YOU KNOW YOUR QUESTION IS A VERY GOOD ONE. COMMISSIONER CLARK ABOUT SPECIFICALLY IS STUART AND JUST THE HOW THIS PRESENTATION IS STRUCTURED REVEALS HOW THEY LOOK AT THE CHARACTER OF EACH NEIGHBORHOOD. THEY DIDN'T DO CITY OF STEWART. THEY DID EASTER AND NOW THEY'RE GOING TO DO THE CREEK. SO I THINK THAT'S A UNIQUE AND APPEALING FEATURE. OF THIS, JESSE, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. WE'RE BUILDING AN A D U AT OUR ON OUR PROPERTY AND WE HAD ARCHITECT IN THIS MORNING AND SHE WAS TALKING TO US AND SHE ASKED ME I CAN'T HEAR YOU, COMMISSIONER RICHARD WITH THE ARCHITECT. SHE WAS SURPRISED , SHARE THE STRONG DEGREE OF RESISTANCE TO IT. SO MAYBE YOU'VE ANSWERED THIS QUESTION. AND MAYBE YOU'RE DEALING WITH MS SLACK AND MAYBE YOU'RE TALKING TO THE LOCAL ARCHITECTS ABOUT I WOULD THINK. WE ARE TALKING TO THE LOCAL ARTISTS WE HADN'T HEARD OF, UH, COMMENT ABOUT RESISTANCE TO BUILDING 80 YEARS . UM NOT A DUS, JUST FORM BASED CODE. OH FORM BASED CODES. YEAH A LOT OF ARCHITECTS, UM, ARE CONCERNED, YOU KNOW, INITIALLY, SOME ARCHITECTS CAN BECOME CONCERNED THAT IT IS RESTRICTIVE OF THEIR CREATIVITY, WHICH IS AN UNDERSTANDABLE CONCERN. UM I AM FIRST AN ARCHITECT. SO THAT'S HOW I. I MEAN, AN URBAN PLANNER VIA ARCHITECTURE. UM AS IT IS TODAY, A LOT OF THE CODE, UM WHAT? WELL, PARTICULARLY IN THE CREEK, UM, IS VERY PRESCRIPTIVE . ACTUALLY THERE'S ELEMENTS, FOR

[01:55:04]

EXAMPLE, THERE ARE PORTIONS OF COLORADO THAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO BUILD A BALCONY, UM OR REQUIRED TO BUILD, UM, A ARCADE . AND ALTHOUGH LOVELY, A RECOMMENDATION THAT IS THAT MAY NOT SUIT EVERY APPLICANTS NEEDS AND PROMOTE THE BEST USE OF THAT BUILDING OR THE CREATIVE DESIGNS THAT ARE THAT ARE NOT TALENTED ARCHITECTURE COULD COULD START. UM SO WE'VE BUILT IN MORE FLEXIBILITY THAN THAT AND FORM BASED CODES THEY STARTED. IN THE 19 EIGHTIES, MID LATE EIGHTIES.

LET'S SAY, UM, AND THEY'VE LEARNED A LOT SINCE THEN, SO THEY FIRST WERE INTRODUCED WHEN THEY WERE OFTEN ON SITES WHERE THEY HAD SINGLE OWNERSHIP AND THERE'D BE A TOWN ARCHITECT. AND SO SOMEONE HAD A LOT OF CONTROL OVER WHAT WAS HAPPENING. UM SINCE THEN, THEY'VE LEARNED A LOT AND THERE'S LOTS OF COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT SOUTH FLORIDA WHO HAVE ADOPTED FORM BASED CODES AND ARE SEEING REALLY GREAT BUILT RESULTS FROM THEM AND GREAT FOR THOSE SMALL BUSINESSES WITHIN THOSE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE IT'S REALLY HANDING YOU THE HANDBOOK ON WHAT HISTORIC TOWNS AND NEIGHBORHOODS HAVE LEARNED ABOUT WHAT MAKES A HISTORIC UH SMALL, CHARMING TOWN WORK AND, UM, I, YOU KNOW, I HOPE THAT YOU CAN POINT THAT ARCHITECT MY WAY AND I WILL. I WILL TRY TO CONVINCE THEM THAT THIS FORM BASED CODE ACTUALLY PROVIDES. MORE FLEXIBILITY THAN MAYBE WHAT THEY'VE SEEN BEFORE. AND WHAT'S ON THE BOOKS TODAY? I MEAN, THAT WOULD THAT WOULD BE A GOOD GROUP TO HAVE ON YOUR SIDE. ADVOCATING RATHER THAN THANK YOU. KRISHNA BRAND OR ANYTHING.

OKAY EXCELLENT. YOU ALWAYS DO A GREAT JOB. OKAY I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF THINGS, UH, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS. I KNOW WHEN I ONE OF THE MEETINGS, AND THAT SEEMED TO HAVE A VERY POSITIVE RESPONSE OF THE EAST STEWART, AND THAT'S WHEN I ENSURE THAT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS CAN BE USED AS IT COULD BE AN APARTMENT THAT COULD BE RENTED. YES SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT THE UNIQUE PIECES IN THIS CODE IS THAT IT WILL IT IS ALLOWED TO BE RENTED. UM HMM. OKAY WHAT ARE THE OTHER THINGS IS I'M WORRIED ABOUT, UMH STUFF IN THAT AFFECTS THE COST. UM YOU KNOW, ONE OF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT AFFORDABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY AND ALL OF THESE OTHER THINGS. SO, UM SO I'M WORRIED ABOUT. FOR EXAMPLE, SOME OF THE I LOVE THE PORCHES THE FRONT AGE, BUT I'M ALSO WORRIED ABOUT WHAT IS THE COST THAT ADDS TO THE HOME. UM IS THAT A NECESSARY FEATURE IF IT'S GOING TO KEEP THE HOME FROM BEING BUILT? BECAUSE BECAUSE OF THE COST OF THAT, UM, SAME WITH, UM AND I CAN'T READ. YOU KNOW WHAT I SAID? YOU GUYS GAVE ME A WONDERFUL MEETING OF ALMOST THREE HOURS. UH, WHAT IS THE SIDEWALK WITH? IS IT STILL EIGHT FT FOR THE STEWARD FOR E.

STEWART BECAUSE OF THOSE TIGHTER RIGHT OF WAYS RIGHT NOW, MOST OF THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS STREETS THEY HAVE, LIKE, FIVE FT SIDEWALKS. UM SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THEY BE SIX A LITTLE BIT WIDER, BUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FACT THAT THEY'RE VERY CONSTRAINED WITH THE RIGHT AWAY TODAY. SO LIKE I SAID, I'M JUST A LITTLE BIT WORRIED ABOUT THE COST FACTOR. THE OTHER THING IS AND UM, COMMISSIONER CLARK GOT INTO THIS A LITTLE BIT AND YOU CAN END WITH DISCUSSING. I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED STUB WALLS. UM BECAUSE I'M REALLY THINKING THAT OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS, WE'RE GOING TO SEE NEW FEMA MAPS THAT REQUIRE HIGHER FINISHED FOUR ELEVATIONS, WHICH THEN THAT IS GOING TO AGAIN WITH THE SETBACKS . UM AND THE RAMP ISSUE AND WHETHER STEPS AND RAMPS AND SO I'M A LITTLE BIT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. UM WE DON'T KNOW WHAT UH, WHAT THE FUTURE IS GOING TO BRING, BUT I FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THE NEXT SET OF ROUND OF FEMA MAPS WILL PROBABLY SEE HIGHER FINISH FOR ELEVATIONS. WOULD YOU AGREE? IT'S I DON'T I DON'T THINK IT'S GONNA GO THE OTHER WAY. BUT, YEAH, I AGREE. THE LAST THING AND I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE PANEL HAS THE ANSWER TO THIS. UH, BUT UM SO IT'S NOT REALLY IT'S NOT REALLY ABOUT THE FORM BASED CODE. BUT WHEN WE DID THE RITA WAS THE READER DISCUSSION. UM WHAT REALLY SHOCKED ME ABOUT A STEWART WAS ACTUALLY HOW MANY VACANT LOTS ARE IN E. STEWART SINGLE FAMILY VACANT LOTS THAT ARE NOT BEING AH DEVELOPED AND THERE'S A THERE'S A VERY RIETI OF REASONS OF WHY THAT'S NOT REALLY FOR GERMAINE TO THIS DISCUSSION, BUT , UM, THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU KNOW, TRYING TO KEEP THE COST DOWN AND TO GET THOSE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS DEVELOPED IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST THINGS THAT AND MAKING IT EAT, YOU KNOW, AND I THE FORM BASED CODE THEORETICALLY. CAN MAKE IT

[02:00:01]

EASIER BECAUSE IT KIND OF GIVES THEM A REALLY GOOD ROAD BACK FOR DESIGNING SOMETHING, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE WATCHING OUT THAT WE'RE NOT PUTTING TOO MUCH IN TO EXAGGERATE THE COST UNNECESSARILY. ABSOLUTELY AND THAT'S WHERE WE'RE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT THE LEVEL OF ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES THAT ARE INCLUDED, YOU KNOW, ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES IN SOME COMMUNITIES, AND THIS IS WHERE YOU GET TO TAILOR THE CODE TO THAT COMMUNITY. YOU KNOW, THERE ARE THERE ARE PLACES UM, WHERE THEY HAVE VERY SPECIFIC. UM YOU KNOW, DOWN TO WHAT KIND OF MILLIONS YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE ON YOUR WINDOWS. THOSE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CODE, SO WE'RE TRYING TO BE MEASURED ABOUT VERY GOOD. SO I JUST WANT TO RESPOND TO THAT.

UM SO WE DO HAVE SEVERAL PROGRAMS THAT COULD HELP ADDRESS THAT WE HAVE A DESIGN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. UM SO IF THEY NEED ASSISTANCE TO DO THE DESIGN FOR THEIR SITE, THERE COULD BE COST SAVINGS FOR THAT, UM, WE CAN ALSO LOOK AT REVISITING THE RESIDENTIAL FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO ADD ADDITIONAL, UH, COMPONENTS THAT ALLOWS THEM TO GET GRANTS FOR THAT. UM AND SO YOU KNOW, WE CAN LOOK AT SEVERAL THINGS ALSO, MAYBE CREATING A PATTERN BOOKS, SO THAT WAY THEY CAN JUST SELECT A DESIGN THAT THEY LIKED, AND THEY CAN GO STRAIGHT TO BUILDING PERMITS THAT THERE'S A COST SAVING FOR DESIGNS. SO WE'LL LOOK AT SEVERAL DIFFERENT OPTIONS. OKAY SO DO YOU. DO YOU ALL HAVE THE DIRECTION YOU NEED FROM THE COMMISSION? DO YOU WANT TO DO THE CREEK AND THEN GET THE DIRECTION THE EAST STEWART PORTION OF IT? YES 11TH PLACE, RIGHT? YEAH I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU GUYS HAVE YOUR INPUT, SO I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE GREEK DISTRICT. I WAS JUST GONNA ASK ANYTHING COULD SHOW US ON THE 11TH OR SHOW THE PEOPLE ON THE 11TH. WHAT ARE THE VACANT PARCELS IN E . STEWART JUST DOING OVERLAY SO THAT THEY KNOW WHETHER THEY'RE 24 28 OR WHATEVER SINGLE LOTS AND THE TAILOR PROPERTY OR ANYTHING ON EAST THROUGH JUST SHOW PEOPLE SO THAT THEY KNOW THAT AND THEN YOU KNOW. OKAY I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT ALSO ALL THE PIECES OF PROPERTY AND CAN WE GET THE NAME OF THE OWNERS? THANK YOU TO ASK MR FOR THAT HABITAT ON OUR NEW PLANNER. OKAY, LET'S MOVE ON TO THE CREEK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT SAME SLIDE FOR THE CREEK HERE. WE'RE NOT ADDING ANY ADDITIONAL STORIES, ALL FOUR STORIES, WHICH IS WHAT'S PERMITTED, UM AT THE MAXIMUM TODAY AND THEN NO ADDITIONAL DENSITY THAT'S NOT ALREADY OUTLINED WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM WE HAVE THIS SIMILAR LANGUAGE HERE AT THE FRONT OF THE CREEK WHERE WE ANALYZED WHAT'S A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AGAIN TO REMIND EVERYONE WHAT'S IN THE EXISTING THEY'LL. DRS IS 50,000 SQUARE FEET. UM WE AGAIN FELT THAT THAT WAS TOO LARGE OF A DEVELOPMENT. YOU KNOW IF SOMETHING CAME IN AT 40,000 SQUARE FEET, UM IT WOULD STILL BE CONSIDERED A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CREEK DISTRICT. SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING 35,000 SQUARE FEET FOR THOSE NON RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. TO BE IDENTIFIED AS MAJOR. AND THEN IT HAS A SIMILAR LANGUAGE ABOUT, UM, REACHING OUT TO THAT . THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, UM, IN THIS CASE, YOU KNOW, IT MAY BE THE CREEK ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. UM. EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAPS, SO THIS ONE'S A LOT SIMPLER. IT'S MOSTLY DOWNTOWN, AND THEN WE HAVE COMMERCIAL, UM, ALONG FLORIDA STREET, AND THIS IS DIXIE. THIS IS, UH, COLORADO FOR REFERENCE. AND THEN THIS IS MLK. AH IF YOU'LL NOTICE AT THE VERY TOP OF QANTAS PARK, THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT THAT WAS STILL DESIGNATED DOWNTOWN. SO AGAIN, WE WANT TO CLEAN THAT UP, UM, AND REFLECTED AS RECREATION. UM AND THEN THE OTHER CHANGES FOR THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OVER THE COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE, WHICH IS HIGHLIGHTED IN THE ROCK THE RED SO THIS AREA WAS BROUGHT INTO THE CREEK DESIGNATION. UM WHICH IS AN ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. SO WE WANTED TO UPDATE THE L. D. R S TO REFLECT THAT DESIRE. UM AGAIN. WE HAVE RIGHT NOW THERE IS A MAX DENSITY OF 30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR THE COMPLAINT IN THERE, AND THAT IS THE SAME WITHIN THE DESIGNATION OF DOWNTOWN. THAT SAID, UM, WE'RE GETTING DOWNTOWN'S YOUR BIG UMBRELLA. THE ZONING GETS MORE SPECIFIC, AND THE ZONING IS ACTUALLY CAPPED AT THE 15 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND OUR RECOMMENDATIONS. UM AND THEN ALSO JUST FOR FRAME OF REFERENCE . THERE ARE ONLY THREE VACANT PARCELS WITHIN THIS AREA. SO AGAIN, ALL THOSE EXISTING BUSINESSES CAN CONTINUE THIS THIS IS A DIFFERENT AREA WHEN WE GET TO OUR ZONING MAP BECAUSE WE WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE ALL THE JOB CENTERS. WE HAVE CLOSE TO OUR DOWNTOWN WITHIN THIS AREA. UM BUT THOSE THREE VACANT PARCELS RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST JUST TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT IT'S INCREMENTAL. THESE ARE ALL. UM UM, IF ANY CHANGES HAPPENING

[02:05:05]

AREA WHERE ARE THEY? SORRY WHERE ARE THEY? RIGHT RIGHT NOW WHERE THE B MINUTES AGO. BACK SO THIS IS FLORIDA STREET, RIGHT? UM THIS RIGHT HERE IS DIXIE. SO THIS IS SEACOAST RIGHT HERE.

SEACOAST ALSO OWNS THIS PARCEL. THIS IS WHERE PETER'S HARDWARE IS. THIS IS THE POST OFFICE. SO YOU'VE GOT A COUPLE OF, UM LIKE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES THERE RIGHT NOW. WE'LL JUMP TO THE ZONING IN JUST A MINUTE. AND SO WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE USES A LITTLE BIT MORE THERE. NO, NO, IT'S GOOD. UM BUT THE AGAIN WE WANTED TO, EVEN THOUGH WE'RE BRINGING THEM INTO COMMERCIAL IN THE ZONING, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE RECOGNIZE THOSE EXISTING USES. AH SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAP, ALL WITH THE SAME DOWNTOWN DESIGNATION, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QANTAS PARK AND RECREATION. AND THAT'S MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE OWNERSHIP PATTERNS, THE CRS AND THE COMMUNITY'S VISION THAT WE HEARD IN ALL OF OUR OUTREACH. THIS IS THE EXISTING ZONING MAP . AND THEN HERE'S THAT BE, TOO, THAT WE TALKED ABOUT NOW BE, TOO IS A VERY, UM KIND OF GENERAL BUSINESS USE IT ALLOWS FOR AUTOMOTIVE USES AND BOAT USES. UM AND WE DON'T WANT THOSE USES TO COME OVER HERE INTO OUR GENERAL, UM, URBAN AREA, SO WE MADE SURE TO CREATE A SPECIFIC DISTRICT WHERE THOSE USES ARE SO THAT WE CAN HONOR THOSE USES GOING FORWARD. UM THIS IS THE REGULATING PLAN. YOU'LL NOTICE THAT, UM WE STILL HAVE THREE DESIGNATIONS WITH THEIR BOUNDARIES ARE VERY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WAS BEFORE. SO THIS IS CALLED CREEK NORTH, WHERE WHICH IS NORTH OF FRASER CREAK AND CREAK SOUTH, WHICH IS SOUTH OF FRASURE CREEK. AND THEN WE HAVE CREEK INDUSTRIAL AGAIN, GIVING THAT DESIGNATION OF INDUSTRIAL SO THAT WE KNOW THAT THAT CHARACTERS DIFFERENT THAN THE REST OF OUR URBAN DOWNTOWN. IT ALLOWS FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY OF USES. AND WE ALSO RECOGNIZE ALL OF OUR CIVIC SITES THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT, INCLUDING ONE THAT'S JUST OUTSIDE OF IT, WHICH IS THE CAMDEN'S POCKET PARK AND ACCESS TO THE WATERWAY THERE. NOW TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE B TWO USES. WE HAD EXCELLENT COMMENTS WHEN WE PRESENTED TO THE L P A. SO WE MADE SURE WE WENT BACK AND DID A MORE THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF WHAT WAS PERMITTED THERE, SO WE MADE SURE THAT THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CARRIED OVER TO THAT AREA THAT WAS AN EXISTING USE THAT'S PERMITTED TODAY ALONG WITH AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR WITHIN AN ENCLOSED BUILDING. WE ALSO ADDED LANGUAGE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THAT USES PERMITTED WHEN FACING US ONE AND FLORIDA STREET. UM HEALTH CLUBS . WE ACTUALLY HAVE HEALTH CLUBS IN CREEK NORTH IN THE CREEK SOUTH, AND THOSE WERE NOT, UM EXPRESSIVELY LISTED THERE, SO WE WANTED TO ADD THOSE TO ALL ALL THE DISTRICTS, UM AND THEN KENNELS AND REPAIR SERVICES. UM ALSO A PERMITTED JUST WITHIN THAT, UM, THAT CREEK INDUSTRIAL AREA. AND THOSE ARE EXISTING USES TODAY. WE HAVE A THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR THIS AREA , AND THIS HAS SOME SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FEATURES. UM IT LOOKS SIMILAR, THOUGH AGAIN. WE WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE WATERWAYS THE EXISTING SHORELINE PROTECTION ZONE. THE TRACKS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO IT AND AS WELL IDENTIFY A HIERARCHY OF THE STREETS, SO WE IDENTIFY A AND B STREETS. A STREETS ARE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD FOR CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESS. UM AND THEN BE STREETS ARE ALSO IMPORTANT, BUT NOT THE SAME LEVEL OF, UH, STANDARD. UM THESE CHARTS AGAIN . THESE WERE THESE ARE SIMPLIFIED. BELIEVE IT OR NOT CHARTS, UM, COMPARING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR EACH OF THE DISTRICT. SO EVERY THE AREA THAT'S BEING UM URBAN CENTERS LISTED HERE. THE URBAN GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE HERE. AND HERE'S THE CREEK NORTH STANDARDS. UM YOU'LL KNOW THAT THE HEIGHT REMAINS THE SAME. THE DENSITY REMAINS THE SAME. WE DID MODIFY THE SETBACKS. UM AND THEN WE ALLOW FOR MORE FRONTAGE TYPES AND I MENTIONED BEFORE THAT WE HAVE SOME AREAS WHERE YOU ARE REQUIRED TO DO AN ARCADE TODAY, AND THAT'S JUST TOO UM, TOO PRESCRIPTIVE FOR POTENTIAL APPLICANTS WE WANTED TO BUILD IN MORE POTENTIAL FRONTAGE TYPES, INCLUDING A PORCH AND A STOOP FOR COURT AND BALCONIES. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THOSE THINGS UM BE PERMITTED INSIDE THE CREEK NORTH. UM YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH COLORADO, THERE'S YOU KNOW, BEAUTIFUL HISTORICAL. HOMES IN THAT DISTRICT ALREADY, UM, WHO HAVE PORCHES AND STOOPS? SO, UM, WE WANTED TO RECOGNIZE THAT UM, THERE'S MOSTLY MODIFICATIONS AGAIN WITHIN THE SETBACKS, UM, WHICH WILL PROMOTE FOR ALLOW FOR MORE WIDER SIDEWALKS. AND UM, DOESN'T REQUIRE THAT THOSE BUILDINGS COME RIGHT UP TO THE STREET. THEY CAN HAVE A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBILITY ON THEIR SIGHTING. VERY SIMILAR WITH THE CREEK SOUTH. WE HAVE THE EXISTING HEIGHTS COMING OVER. UM

[02:10:06]

AND A FEW MORE MORE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN HERE THAT WE'RE, INCLUDING THAT AREN'T IN THE CHART RIGHT NOW, FOR EXAMPLE, THE SHORELINE PROTECTION ZONE WITHIN THE SIERRA IS A POLICY THAT'S IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, BUT IT'S NOT IN THE CHART RIGHT NOW, WHEN YOU GO TO THE URBAN CODE SO AGAIN. THIS IS , UM, OUR EFFORT TO TRY TO BRING AS MANY OF THE REGULATIONS THAT EXIST TODAY INTO ONE SPOT FOR THE CREEK. SO THAT APPLICANTS AND, UH THE COMMUNITY NOT UNDERSTAND THE EXPECTATIONS. UM AND WE ALSO INCLUDED A BILL TO ZONE FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG US ONE. WE CONDUCTED THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN STUDY AND ONE OF THE COMMENTS WE HEARD OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND IN THE SURVEY WAS ON SET THAT WE HEARD FROM THAT WAS THAT PEOPLE CAN'T SEE THE BUSINESSES ON US ONE. AND THAT IS PART OF THE REASON WHY THEY YOU KNOW, AT THE TIME THEY HAD SOME VACANCIES. UM AND SO WE'RE ENCOURAGING THOSE BUILDINGS IF THEY REDEVELOPED TO COME CLOSER TO THE STREET, UM, AND TO BUILD OUT A SIDEWALKS AND SHADE TREES AS PART OF THAT SETBACK AREA. AND THEN AGAIN, THE CREEK INDUSTRIAL IS FOR THE MOST PART WORK WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BRINGING OVER THE SAME THE SAME STANDARDS. WE MADE A LOT OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE SETBACKS BECAUSE, UM, OF 30 FT FRONT SETBACK ON THOSE SITES, IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN IN THAT AREA IS CRAZY BECAUSE THE SITE IS ONLY MAYBE 80 FT DEEP. SO UM, YOU KNOW, THESE ARE ALL ACTIONS WERE ACTUALLY HELPING TO BRING SOME OF THOSE BUILDINGS. INTO STANDARDS THAT ACTUALLY ALIGN WITH WITH WHAT'S ON THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT TODAY, UM SO THAT THAT FRONT SETBACK WAS THE BIG ONE BECAUSE THE AGAIN THE CITED THAT THOSE PLOTS ARE SO SMALL. INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THE CREEK INDUSTRIAL IS ACTUALLY A HISTORICALLY PLOTTED AREA, AND IT WAS ONE OF THE, UH, DEED RESTRICTED AREAS. UM AS ORIGINALLY PLANTED AS LINCOLN. UM, SO IT'S A IT'S AN OLD PART OF THE CITY. UM, THERE WAS HISTORICALLY BLACK. UM WE ALSO INTRODUCE CIVIC OPEN SPACES AND THIS IS SOMETHING WE GOT SOME COMMENTS ABOUT THROUGH THE L P A MEETINGS AND WE WANTED TO RESPOND TO THOSE. UM WE WANTED TO CLARIFY THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR PROJECTS THAT ARE GREATER THAN THAT. OUR PARCELS ARE SAT ON GREATER THAN AN ACRE, SO THIS IS NOT GOING TO AFFECT YOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THIS IS NOT GOING TO AFFECT DUPLEXES OR SMALL INFILL BUSINESSES. THIS IS ONLY GOING TO AFFECT IF THERE IS A PROJECT THAT IS OF THIS LARGER SCALE AND WHAT WE'RE ASKING OR REQUIRING IN THESE REGULATIONS IS THAT SPACE IS SET ASIDE FOR PUBLIC USE. AND PART OF THAT IS, YOU KNOW YOU'RE GONNA YOU'RE NEVER GONNA BUILD OUT 100% OF YOUR SITE AND, UM OFTEN WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN? WHEN A, UH THIS IS? YEAH I'M GUILTY OF THIS AS AN ARCHITECT. YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE AN OPEN SPACE. THIS REQUIREMENT ON YOUR REQUIRE AND ON YOUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

AND YOU ARE ASKED TO MAXIMIZE YOUR BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR YOUR APPLICANT. AND SO WHAT THEY DO IS THEY'LL LOOK OUT THOSE TWO FT ALONG THE SIDE OF YOUR BUILDING AS OPEN SPACE AND THE AND THAT'S NOT REALLY WHAT WE NEED IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. WE NEED TO CONSOLIDATE THOSE, UM, THOSE OPEN SPACES INTO ONE PLACE THAT CAN BE, UM, ACTIVE AND PROMOTE THE BUSINESSES THAT GO INSIDE THOSE SO FOR A SENSE OF SCALE. UM YOU KNOW WHAT 5% IS. IT'S EXTENDING THE SIDEWALK ALONG HERE. IT'S A GREEN SPACE AT THE CORNER OF THIS LOT. THIS IS ONE ACRE. THIS IS, UH ON ACRE AND A HALF AGO. AND THE GREEN SPACES SHOWN AS UM, AS THAT 5% AS A CASE STUDY, WE LOOKED AT AZUL AND AZUL, INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, HAS SOME SPACE AT ITS CORNER WHERE IT COULDN'T. UM YOU KNOW, BECAUSE OF SIGHTLINES. YOU ACTUALLY NEEDED THAT SPACE AND THEN IT'S BEEN TURNED INTO A PUBLIC AMENITY THAT EVERYONE CAN ENJOY AS PART OF THEIR STREETSCAPE. THEY ALSO IN THAT PROJECT EXTENDED THE SIDEWALKS ALONG HERE, WHICH MAKES THE SPACE MUCH MORE USABLE FOR NOT ONLY THE RESIDENTS, BUT BUT EVERYONE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. BUT IF SOMEBODY TRIPS AND FALLS WHO PAYS FOR THE LIABILITY, RIGHT, SO THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS OF MANAGING THAT.

THIS ISN'T A NEW REQUIREMENT FOR CITIES. LOTS OF CITIES HAVE POLICIES LIKE THIS. AND SO WE CAN CARRY OVER SOME OF THOSE POLICIES AND REVISIT THOSE SO THAT THERE'S A SPECIFIC GUIDELINES ON HOW TO DO THAT. BUT AGAIN, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT LARGE SCALE PROJECTS. RIGHT SO ANYTHING OVER AN ACRE, SO THEY'LL BE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ABOUT WHAT THOSE KINDS OF ARRANGEMENTS WOULD BE. IN SOME CASES, IT MIGHT MAKE SENSE TO, UM DEDICATE THAT LAND RIGHT? IN SOME CASES, IT MIGHT MAKE SENSE FOR THERE TO BE A

[02:15:07]

SIDEWALK EASEMENT, SO THERE'S DIFFERENT LEGAL STRUCTURES THAT THAT CAN FALL UNDER. UM AND THAT COULD BE AGAIN PART OF THAT PROJECT'S DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. SO AGAIN, WE'RE JUST WE WANT TO GET THAT OUT IN THE FRONT THAT THERE'S AN EXPECTATION THAT WHEN YOU BUILD A LARGE SCALE PROJECT , OR YOU HAVE A LARGE SITE THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE SPACED THAT ACTIVATES UM, THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THIS IS IN HIGHLANDS, NORTH CAROLINA. UM I LIKED IT AS AN EXAMPLE, BECAUSE IT HAS A KILLING. SO IT SPOKE TO ME. UM YOU KNOW, SO THE THIS IS, UM THIS IS A DEEP SITE , RIGHT? AND INSIDE EACH ONE OF THESE LITTLE SHOPS IS A YOU KNOW, LOCAL BUSINESS. THAT COULDN'T YOU KNOW THERE WAS NO WAY THAT THIS BIG SITE COULD SUSTAIN ONE OF THOSE LOCAL SHOPS WHERE THREE OF THOSE LOCAL SHOPS THE RENTS WOULD BE TOO HIGH. SO WHAT THEY DID IS THEY CARVED OUT THIS FORECOURT INSIDE THE SPACE , AND NOW YOU HAVE MORE SURFACE AREA FOR, UM, ACCESS POINTS FOR THOSE BUSINESSES. THERE'S RESTAURANT DINING AND THE REAR. UM YOU'VE GOT THE RAMPS AND THE STAIRS, SO IT'S JUST A THIS IS A NICE MAIN STREET TYPE OF EXAMPLE OF HOW HOW THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED.

SMART. UM, AND THEN THIS WAS A SLIDE. I WANTED TO JUST HIGHLIGHT AGAIN. THE FRONTAGE TYPES AND HOW IMPORTANT THOSE ARE. UM, THIS IS 630 FT ALONG JOHNSON AVENUE. IF YOU WALK ALONG JOHNSON AVENUE, IT ACTUALLY HAS A LOT OF THE ELEMENTS THAT WORK RIGHT HAS A NICE WIDE SIDEWALK. IT HAS SHADE TREES THAT HAVE COME IN THERE. IT'S GOT A BIKE LANE, THE TRAFFICS PRETTY SLOW ALONG THERE, BUT WHAT IT'S MISSING. IS THE BUILDING, YOU KNOW, AND YOU DON'T HAVE THAT ENGAGEMENT WITH WHAT THE USES ARE INSIDE THAT BUILDING. UM SO THIS IS WHERE THE FRONTAGE TYPES CAN REALLY BE AN ADVANTAGE. UM THESE ARE THE FRONTAGE TYPES IDENTIFIED FOR, UH, FOR THE CREEK DISTRICT. YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THEY'RE SIMILAR, BUT ALSO LITTLE DIFFERENT IN THEIR CHARACTER, AND WE ALSO ADDED THE GARAGE SHOP FRONT AGAIN AND ACKNOWLEDGING THE AREA THAT WE HAVE. IT'S SLIGHTLY THAT'S MORE INDUSTRIAL AND ITS CHARACTER AND HAS THOSE AUTOMOTIVE USES. THE ANOTHER SIGNIFICANT CHANGE THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING FOR THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THIS AREA. UM MAINLY BECAUSE MANY OF THE COMMERCIAL USES WHERE OFTEN CONNECTED TO THE NUMBER OF SEATS AND THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES AND AGAIN AND AGAIN WE HEARD FROM SMALL BUSINESSES THAT THIS IS A REAL CHALLENGE TO, UM, MEETING THE NEEDS OF THEIR CUSTOMERS, FRANKLY, AND FOR THEIR THEIR EXISTENCE WITHIN THE THIS FABRIC, THIS DOWNTOWN FABRIC UM , SO WHAT WE WANTED TO DO IS TAKE A LOOK AT A CASE STUDY FOR THIS RIGHT? AND SO, FOR EXAMPLE , THIS IS ROASTED RECORD. IF YOU FOLLOWED THE CODE TODAY, UM AND THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 12 PARKING SPACES. UM 12 PARKING SPACES TAKES UP AS YOU CAN SEE THE ENTIRE SITE. YOU DON'T HAVE A PROJECT ANYMORE. YOU DON'T HAVE A SMALL BUSINESS ON YOUR ON COLORADO ANY LONGER.

UM SO THERE WAS A VARIANCE GRANTED, AND THEY PROVIDED ESSENTIALLY WHAT IS VERY CLOSE TO WHAT OUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT ALL COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES PROVIDE 123 USES. I'M SORRY, PROVIDE 1 TO 300 IN THEIR SQUARE FOOTAGE, AND THIS WILL ALLOW FOR THE ADAPTIVE RE USE OF BUILDINGS AND PROMOTE THE SMALL INFIELD BUSINESSES. UM AND THEN TO CLOSE OUT IN BOTH DISTRICTS. UM I WANTED TO NOTE THAT THESE ARE BOTH ON OUR FRASURE CREEK. SO IT'S CENTRAL TO THE CREEK DISTRICT, BUT IT'S ALSO THE WATERSHED FOR THE EAST STEWART NEIGHBORHOOD, SO BAKED INTO ALL OF THE REGULATIONS THAT WE ARE BRINGING FORWARD OR HOW DO WE GET OUR GREENBACK WHICH IS STOLEN FROM DR SOTO, WHO ENTERED, UM BRIEFED THE COUNCIL THE OTHER DAY ON LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT. UM SO WE HAVE BUILT INTO THE THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS , THE CIVIC OPEN SPACE, THE PARKING LOT STANDARDS AND LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AS MANY, UM , WHAT WE FEEL ARE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CODE TO FACILITATE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AS PART OF ANYTHING THAT COMES FORWARD IN THE EAST DISTRICTS. WHAT'S UNIQUE ABOUT HAVING THESE TWO AREA IS PART OF ONE WATERSHED IS IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY TAKE SOME METRICS ON HOW IT'S WORKING. AND UM, YOU KNOW, EXPAND THE KIND OF STUDY THAT THAT THESE THINGS CAN DO FOR OUR WATERWAYS AND IMPROVING OUR WATERWAYS AND WE WILL BE GOING TO I WILL BE GOING TO THE, UM UH , UM. CONFERENCE IN OCTOBER TO AUDIT THE CODE AND GET RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THERE FROM THERE. THEY'RE THEY'RE EXPERTS.

DR BEAN. UM NEXT STEPS. AND THIS WAS, UM, COMMISSIONER CLARK, WHAT YOU WERE MENTIONING OCTOBER 11TH. WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING A SIMILAR PRESENTATION AT THE 10TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER, GETTING

[02:20:04]

FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION AGAIN ON THESE RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE BACK. UM NO. NOVEMBER 10TH AT THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY TO PRESENT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS AGAIN. AND THEN WE'LL BE BACK HERE UNDER THE NUMBER FIRST IN NOVEMBER, 14TH I'M SORRY FOR THE FIRST READING SO SEE YOU AGAIN SOON. JESSICA THANK YOU SO MUCH. AND UM, FIRST BEFORE I START WITH MY QUESTIONS, AND BEFORE I GET INTO THE I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU LAST TIME, HUH? NO I WANT TO THANK YOU. WE MET WITH THIS THE OTHER DAY WE MET FOR ALMOST THREE HOURS AND PART OF IT WAS FOR MY EDUCATION, BUT ALSO TO PREPARE FOR THIS MEETING. AND I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR REALLY? DOING A TRIMMED DOWN , THOROUGH PRESENTATION. I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. UM SO AS WE DISCUSSED WHEN WE MET IN PERSON, I HAVE A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THE CIVIC USE ISSUE, AND QUITE HONESTLY, I REALLY DON'T THINK WE SHOULD PUT THAT IN, I THINK AND THERE'S THERE. THERE'S A LOT OF REASONS. ONE IS WE'RE ALREADY REQUIRING SIDEWALKS, REQUIRING OTHER THINGS THAT I THINK ARE GOING TO THAT WILL THAT ARE EFFECTIVELY ARE MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT ANYWAYS. BUT WHEN I LOOK AT THE SPECIFICALLY WHEN I ALSO GET INTO THE CREEK INDUSTRIAL SECTION AND I GET OVER AWFUL, LIKE CHURCH STREET, FOR EXAMPLE, AND YOU START LOOKING AT AND EVEN AND THIS IS EVEN GONNA BE A PROBLEM WITH SIDEWALKS AND BECAUSE EFFECTIVELY, THE RIGHT AWAY HAS BECOME THE PARKING, UM. THESE ARE THE BUSINESSES HAVE BEEN THIS WAY FOR THIRTIES SINCE IN ALMOST 30 YEARS. I'VE LIVED IN STUART, UM, CHURCH, YOU KNOW, OVER ON CHURCH STREET. THERE'S ONE CHAP OVER THERE THAT YOU KNOW THERE'S A COUPLE OF PLACES OVER THERE, AND THERE'S LIKE AN ALLEY OVER THERE THAT'S BEING USED AND IT'S GONNA BE A REAL CHALLENGE, AND I THINK TO UPSET THE CART TOO MUCH ON THAT, UM I'M A BIG FAN OF WIDE SIDEWALKS. BUT I'M ALSO CONCERNED THAT WE'RE PUTTING TOO IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTION. UH ESPECIALLY THAT WE'RE PUTTING TOO MUCH EMPHASIS ON SIDEWALK PORCHES, FACADES, FRONTAGE AS WELL. WELL AND SO TO ADDRESS THAT QUESTION, THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE CIVIC OPEN SPACE WOULD ONLY BE IF SOMEBODY ACQUIRED AN ENTIRE ACRE AND PLAN TO REDEVELOPMENT. RIGHT NOW. NO ONE IN THAT DISTRICT OWNS AN ENTIRE ACRE. I UNDERSTAND. I DON'T WANT TO WANT TO KEEP DON'T WANNA KEEP IT ON ASSEMBLAGE FROM HAPPENING BECAUSE OF THIS, SO IT'S MY OPINION, AND I LOOK FOR YOU TO HEAR HIM FROM THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS. UM ABOUT SCRATCHING THE CIVIC USE PORTION OF IT. UM I THINK THAT WE NEED TO TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT OVER SPECIALLY IN THE CREEK INDUSTRIAL ABOUT THE SIDEWALK ISSUE BECAUSE I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT TO GET THE WHOLE SIDEWALK STING IN THERE, AND I'M BEING VERY SPECIFIC. AS TO THAT ONE SECTION THERE JUST BECAUSE I'VE SPENT A LITTLE TIME OVER THERE. I'VE BEEN VISITED. A FEW OF THE BUSINESS IS NOT RELATED TO THE CODE, BUT JUST EITHER AS CUSTOMERS OR AS A CITY COMMISSIONER OVER THE YEARS, UM AND THEN ALSO IN THE CREEK INDUSTRIAL, CAN YOU BOOK PUT IT BESIDE FIRST? WHAT THE REQUIRED FRONTAGE IS OUR SO WITHIN THE CREEK INDUSTRIAL, THEY WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO DO AN ARCADE BECAUSE THAT'S NOT REALLY IN KEEPING WITH THOSE. I THINK INDUSTRIAL BREAD PORCHES SUIT I DON'T KNOW. YOU KNOW A BETTER EXACTLY WHAT A STOOP WOULD BE FOR THAT STORE ON HIS FINE ARCADE, BUT I THINK, UH, BRACKETED BALCONIES, PORCHES IN THE INDUSTRIAL. I THINK WE CAN CLEAN. I THINK WE CAN SIT THERE AND TRIM THAT DOWN. I'M GOOD WITH THE GARAGE DOOR FRONTAGE, BUT I THINK WE REALLY SHOULD LOOK AT TRIMMING DOWN SOME OF THAT IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTION, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO WE KEEP WE KEEP HEARING ABOUT CREATING HIGHER END JOBS, BUT WE DON'T WANT TO DO IS HAVE THEM SPENDING SO MUCH TIME ON LOOKING AT THIS ALL THE ARCHITECTURE STUFF THAT THEY'RE GOING YEAH, I NEED IS A SQUARE BUILDING. YOU KNOW, RIGHT? SO AND THEN FINALLY , UM, VERY, JUST THE LAST THING . I'M JUST PLEASED TO SEE. I THINK THAT YOU'VE COME UP WITH A GOOD SOLUTION ON PARKING. IT'S BEEN I'VE BEEN I'VE BEEN STRUGGLING WITH THE WITH THE I THINK THE INEQUITY OF PARKING FOR BUSINESSES AND THE OTHER SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS. UM SO I THINK THAT YOU'VE COME UP WITH A PRETTY GOOD SOLUTION. SO, UM COMMISSIONER RICH DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER COLLINS JUST THANK YOU FOR DOING THIS. I KNOW THIS IS PROBABLY CONSUMED YOUR LIFE TO A LARGE EXTENT. AND I REALLY LIKE WHAT YOU'RE DOING. I LIKE THE DIRECTION THAT THIS COULD BE SORT OF DEPLOYED AT THE ENTIRE CITY TO AVOID. THE ONE OFF P U D PROJECTS THAT DON'T HAVE ANY SORT OF VISION OR UNIFIED

[02:25:05]

CHARACTER. AND SO I LIKE I LIKE WHAT YOU'RE DOING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. YOUR BROTHER. NO, I'M HAPPY. CLARK. OKAY YEAH, WELL, YOU'VE MENTIONED THE SETBACKS. NOW WE HAVE PUBLIC HOUSING CURRENTLY IN THE CREEK DISTRICT. AND, UM, SORRY. THANK YOU. WE HAVE PUBLIC HOUSING IN THE CREEK DISTRICT, AND WE HAVE THE DELAWARE COMMENTS. BUT WE HAVE THOSE, UM AH! DUPLEXES? MM HMM.

THERE AND THERE. THERE'S WAYS TO CONTINUE TO PRESERVE THOSE. I THINK THAT WOULD BE LIKE IN THE BLUE. THE BLUE AREA. YEAH THE BLUE AREA AND AH! SO THAT'S SOMETHING THERE THAT, UM WOULD IF THIS IS LIKE THIS, AND I THINK I HEAR COMMISSIONER COLLINS IS SAYING THAT SHE LIKES THE THINGS SO IF IT'S LIKE THIS IF THE PUBLIC HOUSING IT'LL BE A BIG THING IF THE PUBLIC HASN'T STOPS EITHER PLACE WHETHER IT'S IN EAST STEWART ARE THERE, UM, TO MAKE A CHANGE IN IN THE LAND USED, INTRODUCE SOME KIND OF A TWO REDEVELOPMENT TYPE THINGS. SO UM, I JUST WANTED TO JUST US TO BE AWARE OF THAT THE PARKING EXEMPT. I SAW THAT MISS WILL NOT PARKING EXAMPLE PARKING WAYS TO DEAL WITH BORKING BECAUSE IT'S A VERY CONSTRAINED AREA. I HEAR THAT THEY'RE RESTAURANTS OR WHATEVER THAT WANTS TO COME IN THERE. UM I DIDN'T HAVE ANYBODY TO MAKING APPLICATION BEFORE WE DO THE CODE OR NOT, BUT, UM AH, I JUST, UM. I THINK THAT PARKING IN THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE CONTINUING WORK OF SCIENCE AND ART. BUT, UM. WELL AND THIS IS THIS IS AGAIN, YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW, UM, THIS IS A GEARED TOWARDS ALLOWING FOR THAT ADAPTIVE RE USE OF BUILDINGS AND ACTUALLY MAINTAINING SOME OF THAT HISTORIC, UM, BUILDING STOCK. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE WE HAVE HISTORICAL HOMES THAT HAVE BECOME OFFICES AND RIGHT NOW, IF THEY HAVE A CHANGE OF USE THOSE THOSE PROPERTIES COULD BECOME VULNERABLE IN ORDER TO JUST CREATE MORE PARKING SPACES AND I KNOW THAT PARKING IS A CONCERN IN MANY PARTS OF THE CITY, BUT IN THIS AREA, THEY'RE ACTUALLY AGAIN. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ENTIRE DISTRICT, THERE'S STILL OPPORTUNITIES FOR UNDERUTILIZED ASPHALT AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR FOLKS WHO IF THEY NEED IF PARKING DOES BECOME A LARGER ISSUE AS FAR AS THE ACCESS TO THAT PARKING, UM, THAT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED. UM TO POINT TO THE THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS TO AND HOW IMPORTANT THOSE CAN BE, UM, THEY IDENTIFY THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF WHAT SHOULD BE ON THESE THOROUGHFARES. AND SO IT OPENS UP THE CONVERSATION. UM, YOU KNOW, THERE'S ACTUALLY EXISTING ON STREET PARKING ON SOME OF THESE STREETS THAT IS UNDERUTILIZED BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE THE STREET LIGHTING, YOU KNOW, SO THIS HELPS TO IDENTIFY WHAT ARE THE MISSING PIECES THAT HELPS TO HELP TO ACTIVATE SOME OF THAT ON STREET PARKING. UM IT ALSO TO YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT THE, UM, THE INDUSTRIAL AREA AND THOROUGHFARE TYPES. UM WE MADE SURE TO WHEN WE ILLUSTRATE AN EXAMPLE OF THAT WE DID ALSO SHOW THE 60 THAT SUCCEEDED THERE.

THEY'RE SMALLER THOROUGHFARES. THEY'RE ACTUALLY PROBABLY AROUND 50. I THINK MOST OF THEM, BUT WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SMALLER THOROUGHFARE AND THE MOVEMENTS OF CARS BY SHOWING THE SIX FT SIDEWALK IN THAT AREA AND THEN ALSO ILLUSTRATING SUCH SOFT CURVES SO THAT THEY'RE NOT, UM ALLOWS FOR SOME THE MANEUVERABILITY OF SOME OF THOSE , UH, WORK TRUCKS IN THAT AREA CURBS OR WHAT BECOME CHALLENGING SOMETIMES. OKAY JUST GRAB ONE THING. WE'RE TAKING OUT MARINAS AND COMMERCIAL. YES SO WHAT WE WANT TO ACTUALLY DO WITH THAT? AND I'M GLAD YOU POINTED THAT OUT. WE WANT TO CREATE USE GROUP FOR THE MARINAS AND THE AUTOMOTIVE USES SO THAT THEY ARE LISTED RIGHT NOW IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THEY IN THE YOUTH GROUPS ARE LISTED OUT AS SEVERAL DIFFERENT ONES. SO YOU HAVE UM, AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE . AUTOMOTIVE SALES. BOAT SAILS BOAT. THEY'RE JUST LISTED OUT AND A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS. AND SO WE WANT TO GO AHEAD AND MAKE THAT A GROUP WITH CONSISTENT STANDARDS THEY WOULD BE FOR ENCLOSED BUILDING. SO IT'S IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS SO SIMILAR TO WHAT'S THE AUTOMOTIVE SALES AND SERVICES BUT WITH THE BOAT, UH, USE LISTED TOGETHER. CAN I JUST SAY ONE THING, MR MAYOR? I'M SORRY. SO MR CITY MANAGER? YEAH ONE THING MR CITY MANAGER YOU HAD MENTIONED ABOUT US CLEANING THE WATERWAY, THE FRASURE CREEK. UM TRIMMING ALONG THE FRASER CREEK AND SO ON. AND YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THE POCKET PARK THERE. AND THIS IS THE VIEW OF THE AREA. UM WHEN WE DO APPROVE THIS ARE WE SEEN

[02:30:03]

ANYTHING IN THIS PLANS OR THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE COME IN FOR MAIN STREET OR FROM THE CREEK DISTRICT ABOUT DOING ANYTHING? COMMERCIAL CUTE. WHATEVER I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S IF IT'S CUTE.

I'M PROBABLY SHOWING YOU THAT WORD. LIKE YOU KNOW, DOING SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY USES THE WATER FRONTAGE ALONG THE CREEK TO BE AN ATTRACTION OR TO BE, UH PLACE OF GATHERING OR SOMETHING.

WHERE WHERE DO WE HAVE THAT IN OUR CODE TO FACILITATE THAT. ALL RIGHT. SO YOU'RE GONNA YOU'RE GONNA YOU HAVE BEEN CUT OFF. THEY HAVE A LOT OF SLIDES LIKE WEEKEND LIKE I DID NOT SLEEP THIS WEEKEND. UM I HAVE A LOT OF SLIDES ON THE BACK END. LIKE I SAID, I HAD TO TRIM THIS UP, SO I DON'T PICK UP ALL OF YOUR LOVELY TIME. UM YEAH. UM THESE ARE THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS WITH GREAT WE INTRODUCED. ONE OF THE THOROUGHFARES IS A WATER FRONT PROMENADE SO AGAIN, TOO. INSPIRE APPLICANTS TO ACTIVATE THAT WATERWAY. WE ALSO INCLUDE ONE OF THE THOROUGHFARES, SO IT'S NOT CALLED STREET STANDARDS BECAUSE THERE'S THINGS OTHER THAN STREETS, UM, YOU KNOW, ACTIVATED BRIDGES AND AS ANOTHER OPTION FOR HOW THOROUGH AFFAIRS COULD BE DEVELOPED, AND RIGHT NOW THERE'S SOME EXISTING STANDARDS ON WHAT CAN HAPPEN WITHIN THOSE THOROUGHFARE WITHIN THAT SHORELINE PROTECTION ZONE. UM, SO WE ADDED TO THAT BY SAYING THAT THE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THAT WATERFRONT AND CONNECTIONS WITHIN THAT ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE PART OF THAT SHORELINE PROTECTION AREA. UM WE ALSO WENT AND PHOTOGRAPHED EVERY BULKHEAD. SO ANYONE FROM THE L PA WHO'S LISTENING? WE ADDED THAT IN FROM OUR FROM OUR SIDE OF THINGS, WE WERE LOOKING AT IT TO ACTIVATE THE WATERWAY FOR ACTUAL WATER USAGE FOR KAYAKING AND PADDLEBOARDING, AND THAT SORT OF ACTIVITY. MILTON'S DOWN THE ROAD ON THAT ALREADY IS ALREADY GETTING QUOTES FOR TREE TRIMMING OR THE MANGROVE TRIMMING AS SOON AS WE GET THE PERMITTING DONE UM AND THEN I KNOW PANEL IS ALSO LOOKING AT THE FRASER CREEK BRIDGE AND ELEVATION OF THAT FRASURE CREEK BRIDGE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE U . S. ONE CORRIDOR STUDY SPOKEN WITH BELTRAN. REGARDING THE BRIDGE AS WELL. RIGHT SORRY. I JUST SAID I SPOKEN WITH BETH BELTRAN FROM THE MPO REGARDING THE BRIDGE AS WELL. SO I WOULD LIKE TO SAY OVER THE YEARS HELPING ELLA'S WITH THIS REDEVELOPMENT ALL THESE VISIONS HOW SHE HAS SLOWLY DRUG US ALONG AND TRYING TO GET THERE AND FOR US TO UNDERSTAND, AND ALL THAT. I THANK YOU FOR THAT. THANK YOU , MANAGER THAT THAT'S REALLY GREAT. I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE THAT SO EXCITING QUESTION TO THE COMMISSIONERS IS HOW DO YOU ALL FEEL ABOUT HAVING, UH THEN REMOVE THE CIVIC REQUIREMENT. DO WE HAVE CONSENSUS ON THEIR OWN OR RELIABILITY? YES, FOR ME. YES MR RICH. DO YOU HAVING A PROBABLY DON'T AGAIN? I DON'T WANT TO. PROBABLY DON'T WANT TO VOTE OR GIVE ANY SPECIFIC DIRECTION BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO GO AGAIN TO THE L P A. AND THEN AGAIN TO YOU AS A CITY COMMISSIONERS 1ST AND 2ND READING SO JESSICA KEN, OBVIOUSLY TAKE YOUR CONSIDERATIONS INTO INTO CONSIDER YOUR COMMENTS INTO CONSIDERATION, AND THEN WHEN SHE COMES BACK AS IT RELATES TO THIS, SHE MAY HAVE OTHER RESPONSES AND HOW TO ADAPT THAT RATHER THAN GIVING THE ACTUAL TREASURE TONIGHT ABOUT THEIR INPUT, RIGHT, MR MAYOR. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HEARD IT. I WAS ON THE L P A. AND THAT CAME UP. THAT WAS A BIG CONCERN. AND JESSE SAID WHEN SHE GOES BACK TO THE L P A ISSUE WILL ADDRESS THAT SPECIFICALLY. OKAY I THINK WE LET HER MAYBE FLUSH IT OUT, SO WE HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING CONCERN. I WAS GONNA HAVE TO PUT A PLAYGROUND IN MY FRONT YARD. YOU KNOW, THAT'S NOT REALLY WHAT THIS IS. IT'S NOT. I DON'T THINK IT'S THAT EITHER, BUT I THINK I HAVE A PRETTY GOOD IDEA WHAT IT IS. IT'S JUST JUST HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL CONCERN. THAT WAS IT WAS STRONGLY SHARED BY THE OPUS. SO LET'S SEE WHAT SHE DOES THERE. OKAY STAFF WE'VE DISCUSSED MAYBE DOING A TRUST FUND. MM. UH INSTEAD OF MAYBE IF THEY CAN'T PROVIDE CIVIC SPACE OR DON'T WANT TO PROVIDE CIVIC SPACE, MAYBE THEY CAN CONTRIBUTE TO TRUST FUND SO THAT WE HAVE FUNDING TO DO SOMETHING AT A LARGER SCALE FOR PUBLIC BENEFIT, BUT THAT'S MORE THAT'S MAKING IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR YEAH, THAT'S ONE OF MY THING IS THE COST FACTOR. SO ONE? I'LL TALK. I'LL GET WITH YOU AND JESSICA AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT A LITTLE BIT FURTHER. BUT UM, SO THANK YOU SO MUCH. I THINK THAT IS, EVERY MINISTERS HAVE THEIR QUESTIONS.

YEAH I OKAY. SINCE I'M GONNA BE BLAMED. I KNOW THAT THIS IS LIKE THE FIRST ITEM PRESENTATION. BUT FOR EXAMPLE, THAT PUBLIC SPACE I THINKING OF ON THE SIDE BY THE POST OFFICE IN FRONT OF THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS WHERE WE ALREADY HAVE, UH, COMMON AREA AND WE HAVE THE WATERFRONT. WELL

[02:35:04]

THEIR PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS ALL ALONG THE WATERFRONT BETWEEN THERE AND A ONE A AND THEY'RE INTERESTED IN PROBABLY WHENEVER THEY DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY. CREATING SOMETHING THERE, WHETHER IT'S A FOOTBRIDGE OR ANOTHER PATH OR SOMETHING, AND SO THAT'S IMPORTANT. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO KEEP OPPORTUNITIES. THERE WON'T NECESSARILY IMPACT SOMEBODY TO FORCE THEM TO DO SOMETHING. BUT IF WE LOSE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES MAY JUST COMPLETELY LEAVING IT OUT. THEN WE WON'T BE ABLE TO DEVELOP AND ADD TO WHAT WE HAVE. TO CREATE A BETTER PARK SYSTEM OR WHATEVER IT IS. AND I HAVE 11 QUESTION QUICKLY, UM IN THE CREEK DISTRICT. IS THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT SEVENTH STREET CHANNEL AND MCPHERSON? IS THAT IN THE CREEK DISTRICT? NO, IT IS NOT. NO OKAY, CAN WE ADD IT? EXACTLY NO. OKAY THANK YOU, JESSICA. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL OF YOUR HARD WORK AND YOUTUBE CHANNEL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU. OKAY

[CONSENT CALENDAR]

WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE MOVE APPROVAL OF THE PRINCETON CALENDARS PUBLISHED SECOND, OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND MOTION BY COMMISSIONER PARK, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BRUNER FOR ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. SEEING NONE, SHE SAID IT WOULD BE CALLED THE COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES, COMMISSIONER CLARK ? YES COMMISSIONER. RICH YES. COLLINS. YES? MCDONALD? YES. OKAY MOVING ON TO COMMISSIONED

[7. LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE CREEK DISTRICT OF ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT (RC): RESOLUTION No. 84-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH “THE CREEK” DISTRICT OF ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A MONTHLY “FIRST FRIDAY ART WALK” TO PROMOTE THE ARTS AND FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

ACTION LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE CREEK DISTRICT AND GREEK WITH THE CREAK OF ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT COULD JUST BRING UP THAT SINGULAR SLIDE, WHILE THE CITY ATTORNEY REGION SKI COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR AND SORRY. THIS IS RESOLUTION OF 84-202 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CITY COMMISSIONER, THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE CREEK DISTRICT OF ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT INC FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A MONTHLY FIRST FRIDAY ART WALK TO PROMOTE THE ARTS AND FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. COMMISSIONERS YOU SHOULD HAVE ON YOUR COUNTER THERE A REVISION TO THIS AGREEMENT AND RED. THAT'S ALSO WHAT'S UP ON THE SCREEN THERE. IS THAT CORRECT, JIM? YES, IT IS. CONDITIONS ARE A CHANGE IN THE ORIGINAL LICENSE AGREEMENT THAT WAS IN THE AGENDA PACKET, AND BASICALLY, THE LICENSE AGREEMENT IS TO SOLIDIFY THE FIRST FRIDAY EVENT THAT THE ARTS DISTRICT HAS BEEN PERFORMING PROBABLY FOR OVER WELL OVER A YEAR. UM AND IT'S TO WHAT I CALL QUOTE UNQUOTE MAKE IT LEGAL, SO THERE'S SPECIAL EVENTS, AND THERE ARE CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR SPECIAL EVENTS. AS TO THE NUMBER OF EVENTS YOU CAN HAVE PER YEAR. THIS IS A MONTHLY EVENT, BASICALLY, AND SO FOR BY PROVIDING THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT, IT COVERS BOTH THE, UH PUBLIC PROPERTY AND THE PRIVATE PROPERTIES THAT ARE INVOLVED AND SOLIDIFIES THE ART WALK PROGRAM THAT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR WELL OVER A YEAR. AND THEY'RE THEY'RE STILL FOLLOW THE UH, WELL, THEY'LL WILL BE SET UP WITH OUR, UM, EVENT COORDINATOR THAT WHATEVER THEY DO, UM THEY JUST WON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH SOME OF THOSE PROCESSES BECAUSE THEY DON'T THEY DON'T PULL A MONTHLY SPECIAL EVENTS. IT'S ALL SOLIDIFIED WITHIN THE LICENSE AGREEMENT, WHICH IS WHAT WE DO WITH ROCKET RIVERWALK AND WHAT WE DO WITH MARKET ON MAIN STREET. THEY DO PAY A FEE THAT COVERS OUR PORTIONS FOR AS IT RELATES TO, LIKE SANITATION AND SO FORTH. UM OFFSET SOME OF THAT COSTS RELATED TO THE SANITATION FEES. THEY ARE GOING TO BE THIS NEW LANGUAGE CHANGE BECAUSE THE ARTS DISTRICT IS SO VAST COMPARED TO THE ACTIVITY LOCATIONS, PROVIDING US A SITE PLAN MONTHLY. THE WEEK PRIOR TO THE EVENT. MORE THAN LIKELY IT WILL STAY IN THE SAME KIND OF LOCATION ALL OF THE TIME, BUT THEY MAY DECIDE THEY WANT TO MOVE IT TO SOME OTHER LOCATION WITHIN THE ARTS DISTRICT, AND WHEN THEY DO THAT THEY WOULD PROVIDE US SITE PLAN CHANGE.

THERE'S NO OTHER COMMENT. I'D LIKE TO MAKE HER OF MOTION FOR RESOLUTION. 84-2020 ESPECIALLY.

TO PAUL IN HIGH REGARD THE CREEK DISTRICTS OF ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT INC. WHICH HAS SOUGHT TO WORK IN PARTNERSHIP WITH OUR CITY TO CREATE THIS AND TO CONTINUE TO GROW THE COLORADO AVENUE AREA. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CLARK. DO YOU HAVE A SECOND? A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLLINS. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE? ONE PRESIDENT THIS PRESIDENT NOW, RIGHT, PRESIDENT DUNCAN HEARD IF YOU WOULD FILL OUT A GREEN CARD, PLEASE. YOU CAN SPEAK BEFORE YOU FILL OUT THE CARD. I WILL SPEAK BEFORE YOU FILL OUT THE CARD JUST MADE IN YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE FOR THE RECORD. MY NAME IS DUNCAN HEARD ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE CREEK DISTRICT. ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT INC. THE NONPROFIT THAT OVERSEES ALL THIS. WE'VE

[02:40:06]

BEEN WORKING. WITH UM JIM AND OTHERS IN THE CITY FOR MANY MONTHS ON THIS AND I'M THRILLED THAT IT HAS COME TO THIS POINT. UM. THIS MODIFICATION IF YOU COULD PUT IT BACK UP. THAT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO YOU AND YOU ARE ABOUT TO VOTE ON. HAS WON. THIS IS TODAY WAS THE FIRST TIME I SAW IT. WE HAD AN EARLIER OBJECTION. BECAUSE IT WAS TOO BROAD. IT'S JUST COVERED LIABILITY FOR THE ENTIRE DISTRICT. AND THIS SETTLES THAT. MY CONCERN IS THAT IT IS ASKING THAT WE PROVIDE THE NAMES AND THE ADDRESSES OF ALL THE VENDORS. UM AND I WOULD ARGUE THAT'S IMPRACTICAL. WE CAN PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS FOR WHERE THE VENDORS WILL BE LOCATED. BUT WE OFTEN HAVE VENDORS. WE SIGNED THEM UP AND THEN THEY DON'T SHOW UP. OR THEY SHOW UP AT THE VERY LAST MINUTE. SO I DON'T HAVE A RESOLUTION TO THAT, OTHER THAN TO SUGGEST THAT WE SPECIFY WHERE THEY WILL BE LOCATED. CONCERN THAT FROM THE INSURANCE PERSPECTIVE WAS MORE I DIDN'T I DON'T CARE WHO'S GONNA SOCCER TENT OUT THERE. IT'S MORE IMPORTANT TO ME TO JUST KNOW WHERE IT'S GOING TO BE EASILY DONE. EASILY COULD STRIKE THAT THE NAME AND ADDRESS PART AND STILL KEEP THE SITE PLAN AND THE REST OF IT IS PERFECTLY FINE. AND I JUST WANT TO REITERATE HOW HARD JIM HAS BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR A LONG TIME AND I'M JUST THRILLED THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO FINALLY VOTE ON IT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR WE ARE TO STRIKE THAT. YES. I'D LIKE TO AMEND MY MOTION TO DO WHATEVER THE CITY MANAGER IS SAYING THAT HE WILL WORK WITH THE GROUP AND YOU AMEND YOUR SECOND. OKAY SO ANY OTHER ANY FURTHER PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS? SAYING NON SUSAN, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? YES. HOLLANDE BURNER. YES COMMISSIONER RICH YES.

[8. APPENDIX A RATE UPDATES INCLUDING UTILITIES (RC): RESOLUTION 86-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA ADOPTING APPENDIX “A” BY AMENDING CHAPTER 36, CHAPTER 34, AND CHAPTER 42 OF THE CITY’S CODE OF ORDINANCES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.]

MCDONALD YES. ALRIGHT THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY, LET'S MOVE ON TO ITEM. THANK YOU, JIM. UM MIKE , CAN YOU READ THE RESOLUTION RESOLUTION? 86 2 OH, TWO TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, ADOPTING APPENDIX A BY AMENDING CHAPTER 36 CHAPTER 34 CHAPTER 42. OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SO THIS ITEM UPDATES SORRY. ANNUAL UPDATE FOR, UH, APPENDIX A, WHICH IS OUR FEES AND FINES SECTION THERE'S TWO ARE ACTUALLY THREE PRIMARY SECTIONS AND THEN THEY'RE UPDATED. ONE IS THE POLICE OFFICERS OFF DUTY DETAIL RATES. UM IT'S TO COME WITH MORE COMPLIANCE WITH WHAT ARE SURROUNDING AGENCIES ARE DOING. I THINK WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE A LITTLE LOWER THAN WHAT THEY ARE. BUT IT ALSO COMPLIES WITH, UM THE RECENT UNION NEGOTIATIONS THAT WE'VE HAD, UM AND THEN WE'LL BE BRINGING THAT TO YOU EITHER, PROBABLY AT THE NEXT MEETING THE CONCLUSION OF THE UNION NEGOTIATIONS, BUT THE RATES WERE OFF DUTY, READ DETAILS IN THAT AND BECAUSE IT'S A PART OF APPENDIX A. IT ONLY MADE SENSE. UPDATED NOW RATHER THAN BRINGING BACK APPENDIX A TWICE THE OTHER SECTIONS OF APPENDIX A OR THE UTILITY SECTION, SO WATER, SEWER AND SANITATION ALL OF THOSE RATES ARE STANDARD FOUR POINT I THINK IT'S 4.53 FOR EVERY ONE OF THE THREE UTILITIES NO MATTER WHAT OPTION YOU TAKE IN THE SITUATION ON MOVE OR DON'T MOVE THE FACILITY AT MARTIN LUTHER KING AND GEORGE AVENUE, BUT TO CLARIFY THAT'S JUST FOR THE FIRST YEAR AFTER THAT, IT WOULD FLIP INTO 6.25 CORRECT. SO FOR APPENDIX A. FOR THIS ADOPTION OF THIS, IT DOESN'T THAT DOESN'T AFFECT IT DOESN'T MATTER FOR THIS. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? MOTION FOR APPROVAL. OKAY, YOU HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. OKAY SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BRUNER SECOND BY COMMISSIONER RICH AND DO YOU HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? SAYING DONE TUESDAY. WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL? PLEASE COMMISSIONER CLARK ? YES MAYOR MCDONALD. YES COMMISSIONER RICH? YES. YES COMMISSIONER COLLINS? YES ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY MOVING ON

[9. REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO A DATE CERTAIN OF OCTOBER 10, 2022 CCM: DOGSWORLD URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE (QUASI-JUDICIAL): RESOLUTION No. 73-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, CONSIDERING A MAJOR URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO JUSTIN PHILLIPS, (CONTRACT PURCHASER) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 SW 7TH STREET, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.62 ACRES; TO ALLOW THE USE OF KENNELS FOR DOGSWORLD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A TIMETABLE OF DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

TO ITEM NINE, WHICH IS A REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO A DATE CERTAIN OF OCTOBER. 10TH OF THE DOG WORLD URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION TO CONTINUE TO OCTOBER 10TH, AND THEY APPROVED A MOTION TO CONTINUE RESOLUTION 73 DISH 2022. UH CONSIDERING A MAJOR URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE, THAT WOULD BE AN EIGHT CERTAIN OCTOBER 10TH APPROVAL. SECOND OKAY. MOVE YOU MEAN MOVED TO CONTINUE? CONTINUE YES. MOVE TO CONTINUE, SIR. BY COMMISSIONER CLARK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BRUNER ANY PUBLIC COMMENT. HEARING NONE ALL IN FAVOR. I OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES.

[02:45:04]

OKAY SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO GET INTO OUR DISCUSSIONS. LIBERATION AS I SAID, UH, TO COMMISSIONER

[Additional Item]

RITUAL. TAKE THE WE'LL JUST MOVE UP AND TAKE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ISSUE HE BROUGHT FORWARD FIRST BEFORE WE GO INTO THE LOCATION AT BB CHARGERS AND ZONING AND PROGRESS DISCUSSION.

SO CLARIFICATION WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT COMMISSIONER RICH WAS REQUESTING A MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION WE ADDRESSED AT THE, UM RATE HEARING THE OTHER DAY. AS IT PERTAINED TO THE SITE ON THE CORNER OF THEM. OKAY AND UM, GEORGIA AVENUE. THE REASON I MENTIONED THAT IS BECAUSE IT'S NOT TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF HER AGAINST AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND TO APPROVE ANY KIND OF PROJECT WHATSOEVER. IT'S SIMPLY TWO. HAVE STAFF RESCHEDULE FOR NEXT MEETING. THE ISSUE OF THE MOTION BECAUSE THE MOTION WAS TO ADOPT A RATE. BUT IT ALSO INCLUDED LANGUAGE SAYING SPECIFICALLY THAT THE COMMISSION DID NOT WANT TO CONSIDER THAT SITE FOR HOUSING. IS THAT AN ACCURATE PICTURE? TWITTER? CORRECT OKAY, SO HIS MOTION EARLIER THAT WAS FOR AGENDA ITEM AT THE END OF THIS MEETING RIGHT NOW IS JUST A MOTION TO RESET IT FOR ANOTHER MEETING TO ADOPT OR APPROVE A PROJECT. AND JUST TO CLARIFY THE MOTION DURING THE RATE STUDY WAS TO APPROVE THE RATE STUDY. WITH KEEPING THE GARAGE FACILITY AT THE GEORGIA AND MLK. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HOUSING OR REDEVELOPMENT, RIGHT? JUST KEEPING IT AT THAT LOCATION, SO YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE THE CONVERSATION. YES. SO OKAY, SO REMEMBER, WE MADE THIS DECISION JUST 12 DAYS AGO. AND YOU CAN SEE THE LEVEL OF CONCERN FROM THE COMMUNITY AS THEY BECAME AWARE OF WHAT WAS HAPPENING. SO LET ME TELL YOU WHAT I DO KNOW. BECAUSE I'VE ONLY BEEN ON THE JOB FOR 14 DAYS. WHAT I DO NOW IS THERE IS NO BETTER SITE THAT THE CITY OWNS. FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. NOW I'VE BEEN TOLD IT'S THE BEST SITE. BUT THERE CERTAINLY IS NO BETTER SITE THAT WE ARE. I KNOW THAT IT'S NOT REALLY ABOUT MONEY. BECAUSE AND FISCAL YEAR 23. THE RATE IS THE SAME AND FISCAL YEAR 24. THE RATE IS 44 CENTS A MONTH. ADDITIONALLY, EACH MONTH FOR EACH RATEPAYER. AND IN THE THIRD YEAR IT'S 93 CENTS A MONTH. SO THAT'S REALLY CAN'T BE THE BASIS FOR OUR DECISION. AND WHAT I ALSO KNOW IS THIS COMMISSION HAS NEVER HAD A COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL. FOR WHAT TYPE OF A HUB. WHAT TYPE OF WORKFORCE HOUSING. COULD BE MADE AVAILABLE ON THAT SITE. AND I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT BY CITY STAFF SO THAT'S WHAT I'M REALLY ASKING FOR. I'M ASKING THAT WE ARE AT LEAST TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSIDER WHAT CAN GO THERE. I HAVE BEEN TO THREE AFFORDABLE HOUSING MEETINGS. THE FIRST ONE, UM I GUESS. SO THE SECOND ONE WAS IN PALM CITY. AND THE THIRD ONE WAS JUST RECENTLY WITH THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.

AND EVERY TIME I'VE GONE, I'VE LEARNED ABOUT A NEW SOURCE OF FUNDING. FOR THESE PROJECTS.

THERE'S ART MONEY AVAILABLE. THERE'S CR A MONEY AVAILABLE. THERE'S ESSENTIAL WORKFORCE HOUSING MONEY AVAILABLE. I WAS LISTENING TO DR TIM MORE AS I SAID, AND HE'S TALKING. TO THE HOSPITAL SYSTEM UP IN FORT PIERCE. THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT SUBSTANCE. I ITTY SUBSIDIZING THEIR NURSES. NURSES THE FEES FOR THOSE NURSES AND THE DEAL IS THAT LONG WOULD WOULD GET THOSE GET FIRST DIBS ON THOSE NURSES. I ASKED HIM WHAT COULD WE STRIKE A DEAL WITH CLEVELAND CLINIC DOWN HERE, MAYBE MAKE SOME OF THOSE UNITS AVAILABLE FOR THERE'S NURSES, AND HE SAID.

THAT'S A GREAT IDEA. LET'S TALK ABOUT IT. BUT I JUST KNOW. YOU KNOW, WE'VE NEVER. WE'VE NEVER IDENTIFIED AND THIS AND I THINK COMMISSIONER CHAMPIONS HERE. YOU CAN'T BE, AS HE SAID. SORRY AND IS, HE SAID, YOU KNOW, IN DEALING WITH THIS PROBLEM. THIS IS A LARGE GROUP. AND WE HAVEN'T EVEN IDENTIFIED SAID WELL, WHO COULD BENEFIT THE MOST FROM THIS . WOULD IT BE THE NURSES WHO COULD WALK THREE BLOCKS? WOULD IT BE THE TEACHERS WHO COULD WALK ONE BLOCK? WOULD IT BE THE MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES? WHO CAN WALK FROM THERE TO HERE. AND HOW CAN WE ACCOMPLISH THIS UP? SO

[02:50:08]

THAT'S ALL I'M ASKING FOR IS WE RECONSIDER THAT MOTION? AND IN THE CONTEXT OF THAT RECONSIDERATION. WE RECEIVE SOME SORT OF PROPOSAL REGARDING WHAT OPPORTUNITY EXISTS THERE AND HOW THE CITY AND ITS RESIDENTS CAN BENEFIT. BEFORE WE GET INTO THE DISCUSSION IN THE MEAT AND POTATOES. UH I'M GONNA HELP YOU OUT. PROCEDURALLY I THINK WHAT YOU CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, MIKE AND DAVE, I THINK WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS MAKE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE ITEM. HAVE TO BE SECONDED AND VOTED AND BECAUSE YOU AND YOU VOTE IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, YOU DID VOTE. YES SO YOU HAVE TO BE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE MAJORITY. SO UH, YOU'D HAVE TO MAKE A MOTION.

SECOND IT HAVE TO BE SECOND AND THEN IT WOULD HAVE TO PASS TO COME BACK AS AN AGENDA ITEM TO THIS TO DISCUSS THE RECONSIDERATION. CORRECT I'M JUST SO THAT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, SO I JUST WANTED TO HELP YOU OUT THERE. SO IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO MOVE FORWARD TO A RECONSIDERATION, YOU COULD SO THAT WE'RE NOT LANGUISHING HERE . THAT'S FINE, SO I MAKE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER. TO RECONSIDER THE. TO RECONSIDER THE DECISION WE MADE REGARDING THE UTILITY RATE. THE SANITATION UTILITY RATES. IS THAT SUFFICIENT? I BELIEVE THAT'S SUFFICIENT. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SO IT'S FAIRLY APPEARS. IT'S FAILING FOR LACK OF A SECOND, UD AND TAKE A MOMENT TO JUST DISCUSS A COUPLE OF THINGS, BECAUSE WE'RE I GUESS WHERE I'M COMING FROM, UM THOUGH IT MAY BE IT MAY NOT GONNA DISPUTE. IT'S A GOOD SITE FOR SOME SORT OF DEVELOPMENT. BUT THERE'S TWO FACTORS FOR ME. AND ONE IS THE SITE WHERE WE WOULD BE MOVING THE GARAGE. AND IF YOU'RE IN ONE OF THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT WOULD HAVE THOSE GARAGE THOSE ALONG THEY'RE HAVING THOSE TRUCKS COMING PAST YOUR HOUSE EVERY DAY AT 5 30 IN THE MORNING. WORKING THAT'S GOING TO BE A PROBLEM AND ALSO COMING OUT . I HAVE A ISSUE WITH THE SITE BECAUSE I ACTUALLY WENT INTO THE LAST MEETING INTENDING TO MOVE IT. THAT WAS MY GOAL. AND THEN UH, THERE WAS THAT, BUT THEN THERE'S ANOTHER ASPECT THE DIFFERENCE IN COST AND MOVING THE FACILITY FOR KEEPING HIS $66 MILLION TO KEEP IT WHERE IT'S AT, UM $12 MILLION TO MOVE IT.

SO THOUGH IT ISN'T SMALL AMOUNT PER PERSON, IT'S REALLY STILL SICK. IT'S ALMOST LIKE PAYING $6 MILLION FOR THAT PIECE OF REAL ESTATE. I WOULD MUCH RATHER IF WE WERE GOING TO DO SOMETHING.

GO AND SPEND A MILLION IF WE'RE GOING TO DO SOMETHING, LET'S GO SPEND A BIT MORE RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE AND SPENT A MILLION MILLION FIVE BUYING A PIECE OF PROPERTY. THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE WHETHER WE SHOULD OR NOT. THAT'S A DIFFERENT QUESTION , BUT FROM A FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY, I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT, UM. THERE I AGREE. THERE IS A ABSOLUTE CONCERNED ISSUE HOUSING UM AND WE NEED TO THERE NEEDS TO BE SOMETHING DONE ABOUT IT. I DON'T KNOW IF WE I WOULD LOVE FOR US TO BE ABLE TO DO IT. WE'VE WE SAW WE SAW IN 2018. I LEFT THE COMMISSION FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS, AND IN THAT CHANGE, THERE WAS A CHANGE. THERE WAS AN EFFORT TO BUILD, UH, TRYING TO CREATE, UH, NEW SUPPLY. THAT'S THAT SUPPLY IS GETTING ABOUT TO COME ON, AND SOME OF IT'S ALREADY COMING ON. BUT WE ALSO HAVE SEEN THAT THE ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES. AND WE'VE SEEN THE PUBLIC. COME AND SAY, HEY, WAIT A MINUTE. WE WANT YOU TO PUT THE BRAKES ON. I AM. HAS INTENT ABOUT UM. SPENDING SIX EFFECTIVELY TO ME. IN MY OPINION, IT'S LIKE SPENDING $6 MILLION ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT'S WORTH A FRACTION OF THAT I WOULD MUCH RATHER OR IF WE HAD THE RIGHT IF THE RIGHT PROPOSAL AND THE RIGHT THING AND THE RIGHT STUFF CAME ALONG, I'D RATHER JUST BUY A PIECE OF PROPERTY BECAUSE IT WOULD COST LESS MONEY. SO BUT AND I THINK THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ADDRESS.

WE DO HAVE COMING FORWARD THE TWO ACRES NORTH OF THE BRIDGE. UM WHICH IS HAS ITS OWN CHALLENGES. BUT THEY'RE WORKING DILIGENTLY HERE. THEY'VE BEEN WORKING VERY HARD ON THAT FOR SEVERAL YEARS. UM. AND THAT'S WHERE JUST SO WHERE I'M AT BECAUSE IT'S NOT THAT I DON'T

[02:55:05]

WANT TO SUPPORT WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO. I DO. YOU KNOW IN SOME WAYS, BUT I ALSO DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE RIGHT WAY TO DO IT. DO YOU WANT TO JUST? I MEAN, AS REGARDS THE TRUCKS. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FIVE TRUCKS LEAVING IN THE MORNING. AND FIVE TRUCKS RETURNING AT NIGHT. I MEAN, THESE PEOPLE LIVE NEXT TO THE WATER PLANT. SO THIS IS NOT SUDDENLY THE NATURE PRESERVE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. WHEN WE CAME TO THEM, AND WE ASKED THEM WHAT THEY THOUGHT ABOUT IT. THEY VERY MUCH REJECTED THE IDEA. THEY WERE NOT IN FAVOR OF DOING IT. OKAY WELL, MANY OF THE DECISIONS WE MAKE, YOU CAN GO TO INTERNET HERE. THIS IS THAT MANY OF THE DECISIONS WE FIND OURSELVES MAKING. YOU CAN GO TO THE LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEY WILL HAVE A REASON FOR OBJECTING. BUT FIVE TRUCKS IN THE MORNING. AS SOMEONE SAID, IF THEY'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE BEEPING, WE CAN HAVE THEM BACK IN AT NIGHT AND JUST PULL OUT. YOU KNOW, THIS IS ALREADY AN INDUSTRIAL SITE. THIS IS A SITE WE OWN. COST. RATEPAYER. I MEAN, THAT IS JUST NOMINAL. I. ARE WE DISCUSSING THE RIGHT PROPOSAL? EXACTLY. MR. MAYOR. IF WE HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN A PROPOSAL. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE DON'T KNOW IF WE LET LEAST THIS WHAT WHAT MONEY IS WE COULD RECEIVE TO OFFSET THAT $6 MILLION. WE DON'T EVEN KNOW BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T LOOKED AT A PROPOSAL. I WAS SO THAT'S ALL I'M ASKING. THAT WE SEE WHAT CAN BEAN DONE WITH IT. AND WE CAN REJECT IT AT THAT TIME. BUT TO JUST SAY WELL, MR MAYOR, THANK YOU FOR YOUR UNLESS YOU'RE GOING TO CALL FOR ANOTHER SECOND. I'D LIKE I'D LIKE TO SAY SO. ALL OF US ARE IN, YOU KNOW SIMILAR BOATS, RIGHT? WE'RE ALL EXPERIENCING INFLATION. THE COST OF. I WENT TO THE GROCERY WITH MY WIFE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN A WHILE THE OTHER DAY, AND THE GROCERIES WERE LIKE 40% MORE. EVERYBODY IS GETTING HAMMERED BY F P L GAS PRICES. YOU KNOW WE'RE ALL FEELING IT. BUT. I THINK THE LARGER FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION AND FIRST I WANT TO SAY THIS IS THIS COMMISSION HAS IF YOU'RE IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN HOUSING, AND STUART, THIS COMMISSION HAS DONE MORE THEY'VE GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND THE LAST FOUR YEARS TO TRY TO PROVIDE HOUSING. 3000 UNITS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS. YOU MAY OR MAY NOT AGREE WITH THAT THAT THE IMPACT IS BUT THIS COMMISSION HAS DONE THAT. THEY HAVE WORKED TIRELESSLY FOR THAT, UM TO PROVIDE HOUSING STOCK. BUT WHEN WE START TO TALK ABOUT WHAT THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IS RIGHT IS WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THIS OF THIS GOVERNMENT? ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BE PROVIDING UTILITIES CLEAN RIVER FOR EVERYONE TO ENJOY? ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BE MAKING SURE THEIR SANITATION WATER? WHAT IS OUR ROLE? AND IT'S FOR THE PUBLIC. GOOD, RIGHT? WE POOL OUR RESOURCES AS A MUNICIPALITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC BENEFIT. THAT'S A VERY DIFFERENT THING, THEN EITHER THROUGH DIRECTLY LIKE A UTILITY FEE, INCREASE OR INDIRECTLY BY USING LOSING THE UM, EARNING POTENTIAL OF A CITY OWNED PROPERTY, AND WHEN I SAY CITY OWNED PROPERTY, I THINK IT'S EASY TO LOSE TRACK OF WHAT THAT MEANS. IT'S NOT FREE PROPERTY. IT'S NOT A GIFT CARD.

IT IS THE LAND THAT IS OWNED BY ALL OF US. WE OWN THAT. SO THE USE OF THAT LAND RIGHT? SHOULD BE FOR THE PUBLIC BENEFIT, EITHER IN THIS CASE THROUGH THE UTILITY, UH, THROUGH THE SANITATION. OR POTENTIALLY TO EARN OFFSET THE TAX BURDEN FOR RESIDENTS, ALL RESIDENTS WHEN WE START TALKING ABOUT INCREASING UTILITY FEES, SO A SMALL NUMBER OF PEOPLE CAN ENJOY CHEAPER RENT . I THINK WE HAVE TRANSITIONED INTO THE REALM OF WE ARE OUT OF OUR SCOPE OF PRACTICE.

PERSONALLY YOUR WHAT SCOPE OF PRACTICE. IT'S UM AS A CHIROPRACTOR HAVE A SCOPE OF PRACTICE WHAT I'M ALLOWED TO DO LEGALLY WHAT I SHOULD BE DOING ETHICALLY SCOPE OF PRACTICE, SOL WANT MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. BUT WE ARE DEALING WITH LARGER, BIGGER STUFF GOING ON HERE.

INFLATION WE'RE DEALING WITH HOUSING PRICES ARE UP EVERYWHERE. IT IS NOT JUST HERE AT THE CITY STARTS GETTING INTO THE HABIT OF TRYING TO FLIP PUBLICLYRTY TO TRY TO AFFORD SOME PEOPLE, CHEAPER RENT AT THE EXPENSE OF EVERYONE. I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S A VIABLE SOLUTION WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING. I KNOW SOME MAY DISAGREE, BUT THAT'S THAT'S

[03:00:04]

WHERE I'M COMING FROM. OKAY, SO WE ARE WE GOING TO HOLD ON FOR ONE SECOND COMMISSIONER CLARK, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. WE HAVE NO SECOND. THE MOTION IS FAILED. UM I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON

[10. LOCATION SELECTION OF EV CHARGING STATION PARKING SPOTS]

TO THE NEXT ITEM. THANK YOU, OKAY. SO UH, WE CALL UNDER ITEM 10 LOCATION OF E V CHARGING STATIONS, APARTMENTS, FLATS. UM AND WHO IS HANDLING IT? THANK YOU, BEN.

OKAY GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS. JUST TRYING TO GET, UH THIS POWER POINT UP.

IT'S ONLY FOUR IMAGES, SO I PROMISE. NO LENGTHY PRESENTATION TONIGHT, UM, JUST TO BRING THE NEW COMMISSIONERS ON ONTO THE SAME PAGE IF YOU HADN'T SEEN A PREVIOUS MEETING THAT WE HAD UME BACK, DARREN. OKAY WELCOME BACK . DIDN'T EVEN KNOW YOU WERE HERE . YEAH WE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW YOU WERE GONE. ACH, THAT'S RIGHT. HE WENT BACK TO, SO I'LL EXPLAIN THE ITEM. UM TWO MONTHS AGO, FTL APPROACHED THE CITY STAFF WITH AN IDEA PROPOSAL TO INSTALL, UH , ESSENTIALLY A HANDFUL OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS, THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS OR THE E V.

CHARGERS WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE A UM, LEVEL THREE. IT'S THEIR FAST SUPERCHARGERS. YOU MIGHT HEAR IT REFERRED TO AS THAT AND THE IN THE INDUSTRY. UM THE DIFFERENCE IS THE CHARGING TIMES FOR THE CURRENT ELECTRIC VEHICLE MARKET IS CONSIDERABLY LESS INSTEAD OF HOURS AND HOURS TO CHARGE WHETHER IT'S OVERNIGHT AT YOUR HOME OR THROUGH A SIMPLE A C OUTLET. UH, THESE CHARGES CAN CHARGE A FULL CHARGING LIKE 2030 MINUTES, SO IT'S REMARKABLE THAT THE TECHNOLOGY HAS COME ALONG WITH F P L HAS BEEN DOING, UM IN IN LIEU OF IN IN IN KIND OF AHEAD OF WHAT THE STATE WILL BE DOING. WHAT THEIR NEW PLAN THAT THEY RECEIVED ABOUT $198 MILLION FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

EARLIER THIS YEAR AS PART OF ONE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGES. SO OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS OF THE F PL ALL THE UTILITIES. UM A LOT OF PRIVATE VENDORS THEY'RE GONNA BE INSTALLING ON BEHALF OF F D. O T IN THE STATE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE ALL ALONG THE MAIN HIGHWAYS.

EVENTUALLY IT'LL IT'LL PERMEATE TO LIKE US ONE AND FEDERAL HIGHWAY, BUT THAT'S STILL YEARS DOWN THE ROAD. UM F PL JUST KIND OF APPROACHED THIS LIKE THEY DID. I BELIEVE IN FORT PIERCE AND THEN DOWN IN PALM BEACH TO TRY TO GET AHEAD OF IT A LITTLE BIT. PUT SOME FAST CHARGERS INTO THE DOWNTOWN AREA WHERE THEY KNOW THAT THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC A LOT. AND IF YOU IF YOU'VE DRIVEN AROUND, I'M SURE YOU'VE SEEN ALL THE TESLA AND ALL THE DIFFERENT TV CARS, SO WE DEFINITELY HAVE A MARKET FOR IT HERE. I WOULD. I WOULD ASSUME I'D LIKE TO SEE THE DATA MYSELF, BUT I WOULD ASSUME THAT WE HAVE SORT OF A HIGHER UM, YOU KNOW, ALMOST DISPROPORTIONATE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE ARE DRIVING ELECTRIC VEHICLES HERE. THEN YOU WOULD SEE AVERAGE AROUND THE STATE AND I'VE CERTAINLY SEEN IT MYSELF. WHAT THIS PROPOSAL IS TOTALLY FREE FOR THE CITY. WHAT WE'RE GIVING UP IS ESSENTIALLY FOR PARKING SPACES OF REAL ESTATE INSTEAD OF PARKING SPACES, THEY WOULD BE TRANSFORMED INTO CHARGING SPACES AND WITH NEW LAW THAT CHANGED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CHARGING STATIONS ARE CHARGING SPACES CANNOT BE UTILIZED BY REGULAR VEHICLES.

FOR JUST PARKING THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE, UM, A VEHICLE THAT IS CHARGING. YOU HAVE TO BE CHARGING WHILE YOU'RE IN THERE, AND THESE ARE NOT FREE CHARGERS KIND OF LIKE THE CHARGES THAT WE PUT INTO QANTAS PARK. THOSE WERE LEVEL TWOS OR A LOT SLOWER CHARGE. THOSE WERE FREE AND THEY WERE DONATED BY TESLA. AND WE JUST HAPPENED TO WORK OUT AN ARRANGEMENT WITH F PL. THIS WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY A SIMPLE LEASE AGREEMENT FOR 10 YEARS. UM THE CHARGING STATIONS WOULD BE AT ONE OF TWO LOCATIONS AND I'M GOING TO SHOW BOTH THESE OF THE LOCATIONS TO YOU. WE HAD TALKED ABOUT THE LOCATIONS PREVIOUSLY, BUT FBL KIND OF GAVE US SOME FEEDBACK OF SOME CHALLENGES ON INITIAL CATION, SO THE PROPOSAL IS ONE OF TWO AND WHERE THE STAFF IS REALLY JUST LOOKING FOR THE COMMISSION'S GUIDANCE ON THIS, AND WE WOULD ESSENTIALLY BRING A AN AGENDA ITEM TO YOU IN THE NEAR FUTURE FOR THE AGREEMENT. IF THAT'S THE THAT'S THE DESIRE. SO THE FIRST SIGHT RIGHT HERE IS JUST TWO PICTURES, UM, FORCED FOUR LOCATIONS RIGHT HERE AT SAILFISH PARKING LOT.

THIS IS ACROSS FROM CITY HALL ON THE TRAIN TRACKS OVER HERE. THIS IS THE MOST IDEAL SPOT FOR FPL.

NOT ONLY DOES IT PROVIDE THE FOUR SPACES THAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN, THERE'S ALSO TWO TO THE LEFT AND WHAT FTL HAD HAD NOTIFIED US AS MAYBE FIVE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD IN THE 10 YEAR

[03:05:04]

AGREEMENT. IF EVERYTHING IS GOING WELL AND OBVIOUSLY THE UPTAKE OF PEOPLE OWNING CAR TV CARS IS GOING TO SKYROCKET AND BALLOONS STARTING 2023 BY PROJECTION. UM THEY COULD EXPLAIN THOSE TWO EXTRA SPACES AND GIVE US A FULL SIX. BY THAT TIME. IF THAT WAS OUR DESIRE AT THAT TIME, AT LEAST FOR NOW, THEY WOULD GIVE US FOUR UH THE REASON THESE SPACES ARE THESE LOCATIONS WERE CHOSEN. IT WAS ACCESS TO ELECTRIC. THEY ALSO IN ORDER FOR THE PROGRAM TO WORK FOR F P L. THEY HAVE TO BE, UM, KIND OF CENTRALLY LOCATED TO A DOWNTOWN URBAN AREA BECAUSE THE IDEA IS TO TRY AND GET PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO GO GET COFFEE FOR 20 MINUTES WHILE THE CAR IS CHARGING AGAIN. THESE ARE NOT FREE STATIONS. ANYONE THAT PARKS THERE WILL BE PAYING, UM, A RATHER LOW BUT A FEE TO F P L FOR THE ACTUAL CHARGE ITSELF, SO THERE'S NO IN THESE AGREEMENTS.

THERE'S NO ANY YOU KNOW, COST SHARE OR REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CITY. IT'S ESSENTIALLY A FLAT LEASE AGREEMENT. IT'S A BENEFIT TO THE RESIDENTS WHO ARE HERE AND EVEN PERHAPS VISITORS AS WELL. WE WOULD JUST BE GIVING UP FOR PARKING SPACES AND TRANSFORMING THEM INTO INTO CHARGING STATIONS. SO I APOLOGIZE. I DIDN'T WANT TO KEEP KEEP IT TOO LONG. I JUST WANTED TO SHOW THE TWO SITES AND THEN FOR THE NEW COMMISSIONERS CANNOT BRING THEM UP TO SPEED AND WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT HOW MANY SPACES ARE AT THAT LOCATION TOTAL. UM WELL, THERE'S SIX IN THAT LINE RIGHT THERE, THE ELECTRIC CHARGING OR THE WHOLE PARK? UM PROBABLY 40 LIKE 40 50 LESS YES, SIMILAR TO QANTAS PARK. YEAH. AND SO IT WOULDN'T BE. THE QUESTION WOULD REALLY BE. IS THIS THE LOCATION THAT WE WOULD WANT THIS BECAUSE THE OTHER LOCATION THIS ONE WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT TO GET A PICTURE WITH NO CARS THERE. UNFORTUNATELY THIS IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE WELLS FARGO SITE. UM UNFORTUNATELY, THEY WOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO PLACE TO THEIR BECAUSE INSTEAD OF DOING A GROUND TRANSFORMER, THEY WOULD ONLY THERE'S NO LOCATION.

REALLY. THAT'S GOOD OUT THERE FOR IT. THEY HAVE TO BE ON THE POLE. EXACTLY AND THEY WOULD THAT WOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO PROVIDE ENOUGH ELECTRIC FOR TWO UM, AND THERE'S NO ROOM FOR EXPANSION FOR THIS AND IN THE FUTURE, WHAT'S WRONG WITH JUST TAKING THE FOUR AND LEAVE THOSE TWO OUT. WELL WE KNOW IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE ONE OR THE OTHER. BUT THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT THE SAILFISH LOT IS IF THE COMMISSION IN THE FUTURE WANTED TO EXPAND IT TO YOU COULD ACTUALLY GET TWO MORE WITH THE SAILFISH LOT, WHEREAS THE WELLS FARGO SITE IS LOCKED TO A PERMANENT TO RIGHT NOW TO SEE THAT MUCH PARKING OF TAKEN UP, BUT. I'M PERSONALLY TORN ON WHAT THE LOCATION. THE I DO LIKE THAT LOCATION EXCEPT FOR THE RESTRICTED EXCEPT FOR THE NOT THE ABILITY TO EXPAND, BUT I LIKE THE SAILFISH LOCATION BECAUSE I'VE READ THE STATES E V CHARGER PLAN AND PURSUANT TO WHAT THE STATE'S GOALS ARE DEPORTED DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION. AH I THINK IT'S STILL A DRAFT PLAN. IS IT OR DID THEY VISITED? I BELIEVE THAT THE I BELIEVE IT'S THE FULL PLAN APPROVED. I READ IT WHEN I WAS STILL A DRAFT, BUT I THINK THAT IT'S A SENSE BEEN APPROVED BY T. O T. THE SELFISH LOT. ALIGNS MORE WITH THE PLAN BECAUSE IT'S CLOSER TO US ONE AND WHAT THE STATE IS THEIR GOAL IS THERE IS TO GET E V. CHARGERS THE FAST CHARGERS, UH SO THAT PEOPLE COMMERCE CAN AS THE STATE PEOPLE ARE USING THEIR CARS AS PART OF THEIR COMMERCE, EITHER, WHETHER IT'S TOURISM OR FURTHER JOBS OR BUSINESS AND TRAVEL, UH, THEY CAN HAVE CHARGES ALONG THE WAY. ONE OF THE THINGS I FOUND INTERESTING IS SOME OF THE TARGET SPOTS WAS PLACES LIKE INDIAN TOWN. THAT ACTUALLY HAS A LOW E V OWNERSHIP, BUT BECAUSE OF THE LONG 7 10, THERE'S CHARGERS, FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT HAS PUT THESE CHARGERS IN OKEECHOBEE ALREADY, UM, IT'S SO AND IT'S ALL PART OF THAT STATE'S GETTING AHEAD OF THAT STATE'S PLAN. I DIDN'T GET TO FINISH. UH, I'M SORRY, BEN. YOU SAID 10 YEARS. UH AND WE HAVE TO CONTRACT WITH THEM FOR 10 YEARS AND THEN THEY WOULD, IF ANYTHING NEEDS TO BE UPDATED OR WHATEVER THEY TAKE CARE OF EVERYTHING. AND I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THAT UP BECAUSE LET ME JUST GO BACK TO THE SAILFISH LOT AS AN EXAMPLE UM WHAT? WHAT FTL DOES IS LITERALLY WHAT YOU SEE. THERE THEY INSTALL FOUR STATIONS BEGIN WITH FOUR SIGNS. THAT'S PART OF KIND OF LIKE THEIR MARKETING.

AND THEN THEY WOULD ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, UM, SORT OF THE LINING ALL THE ALL THE PAVEMENT , ACTUAL PRINT AND ALL THAT THAT THEY PUT ON THEIR FOR THEIR DEMARCATION. AND UM, IT'S NOT QUITE AS EXTENSIVE AS THE LEASE AGREEMENT THAT WE DID WITH THEM FOR THE PL SOLAR PANEL PROJECT.

THAT WAS THAT WAS A LOT MORE INVOLVED. THAT WAS LIKE A MILLION AND A HALF PROJECT. AS FAR AS WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS WOULD BE ABOUT HALF A MILLION, MAYBE A LITTLE BIT LESS THAN THAT, BUT IT WILL BE A HALF A MILLION IMPROVEMENT FOR US IN AT NO COST TO US. WE'RE JUST GIVING UP THE SPACES. OKAY SO IS THERE A WAY TO NEGOTIATE THAT DEAL WITH THEM? TO WHERE WE CAN

[03:10:02]

SHARE PROFIT THAT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE LOSING FOUR SPACES. UM UNFORTUNATELY, THE ISSUE THAT WE RAN INTO THE REAL ESTATE FOR THEM, AND NOW IT'S TRUE. THE PROBLEM IS THIS IN THE E. V AND THAT MIGHT BE TRUE IN THE FUTURE. THE THERE'S TWO THINGS ONE IS TESLA WAS LOSING MONEY FOR THE LONGEST TIME, AND THEY HAD THE LARGEST MARKET SHARE. FOR ALL THE CARS IN THE COUNTRY.

THAT'S THAT MIGHT CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. THEY'VE RECENTLY STARTED UPPING AN INCREASING THE COST AND ACTUALLY CHARGING FOR THE ELECTRIC BEFORE THEY WERE JUST TRYING TO MATCH THE OVERHEAD FOR PROVIDING THE ELECTRIC. NOW THEY'RE ACTUALLY TRYING TO RECOVER AS MUCH COST AS THEY CAN LITTLE BIT BEYOND THAT, BUT THERE THERE'S THEIR MARKETING THEIR BUSINESS IS STILL SELLING CARS. AND WE'RE SORT OF IN A IF YOU WANT TO CALL IT COMPETING. IT'S NOT REALLY THAT FOR US.

FPL'S NOT SELLING THIS ELECTRIC REALLY AT A PROFIT, EITHER THEY'RE DOING IT SORT OF THAT COST AS WELL BECAUSE THERE'S NO BUSINESS MODEL OUT THERE YET FOR IT, THAT MIGHT AGAIN MIGHT CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. SO THE COST REVENUE OR COST SHARE PROGRAM FOR US THEY WOULD NEVER , THEY WOULD NEVER AGREE TO THAT. WITH THE QANTAS PARK. WE DID A LEASE AGREEMENT THAT THEY GAVE US. I THINK IT'S LIKE COMES TO A 3000 YEAR OR SO IT'S A IT'S A YOU KNOW, MODEST AMOUNT FOR THEM TO PAY US FOR THAT REAL ESTATE. EVERY YEAR. WE HAD NEGOTIATED DOWN WITH THEM FROM 20 YEARS AND THAT AND THAT ONE DOWN THE 15 FOR THE SOLAR PANELS, AND THAT WAS THE SOLAR PANEL PROJECT. THAT'S NOT THE CASE. I WOULD RATHER MAYBE HALF THOSE NUMBER OF UNITS. SEE THE METRICS ON THEM HOW MUCH THEY ARE ACTUALLY USED IF YOU'RE GOING TO TIE UP PARKING AND TAKE PARKING FROM RESIDENTS AND SEE IF THERE'S ACTUALLY BEEN THE DEMAND THAT'S EXPECTED YOU THE GRAPHS AND THE CHARTS OF WHAT THEY PROJECT BUT THEY'RE ALSO TRYING TO SET THESE UP AND SELL ELECTRICITY ON OUR PROPERTY. SO LET'S NO I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE DEMAND THAT MATCHES IT IF WE'RE GOING TO GO THIS ROUTE AND SEE THAT IT'S TRULY A BENEFIT FOR RESIDENTS, BECAUSE THERE'S THAT MUCH DEMAND. MY CONVERSATIONS WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT WAS, UH , CRYSTAL STYLES WHO HEADED THE E V PROGRAM FOR THE STATE NOW IN CONVERSATION WITH HER. THEY ARE THEY ARE NOT, UM PUTTING THE THEY'RE WORKING WITH THE STATE AS PART OF THE STATE TO DEVELOPED THE DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS AND SITES. UM THEY BECAUSE OF THE COST OF THE BECAUSE OF THE COST. IT'S GONNA THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE OPERATING AT A PROFIT LEVEL. IT COSTS ABOUT $12 TO FILL UP. I GUESS PHILIPPA TESLA, SO WHEN IT'S EMPTY OR IN, IT NEEDS A FULL CHARGE. SO I THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH THEY WOULD NEED TO GET TO, UM GET THAT HALF MILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT JUST RECOVERED . UM NOW I THINK WHAT SORT OF GRANTS LIKE STATE OR FEDERAL? I THINK THEY'RE EVENTUALLY THERE'S GOING TO BE. I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GETTING THEM QUITE YET, BUT THEY'RE PLANNING ON GETTING SOME FOR FUTURE STATIONS. UM AND THEN I ALSO THINK THAT, UM WHAT THERE ARE BANKING ON. AND THIS IS WHERE THIS IS KIND OF CRYSTAL BALL KIND OF STUFF IS THAT THEY'RE BANKING IN THE FUTURE AS THE E V MARKET EXPLODES BY 2030 WHEN THEY'RE EXPECTING, ALMOST LIKE YOU KNOW, IN MOST OF THE CARS COMING OFF THE LINE R E V THAT THAT'S WHEN THEY'LL PROBABLY START. SO THE 2ND 10 YEARS IS WHEN WE REALLY STARTING NEGOTIATING THAT THAT'S WHAT I WOULD THINK SO THE ONE POINT I WOULD ALSO MAKE TO THAT. UM, IS ALSO THAT THESE SPOTS WITHIN 20 TO 30 MINUTE CHARGE. NOT ONLY IS IT ILLEGAL TO PRETTY MUCH STAY THERE WITHOUT CHARGING, UM YOU'RE ALSO STILL GETTING CHARGED FOR IT BY F PL UM AS THE LONGER THAT YOU'RE THERE ACCIDENTALLY EXPENSIVE SO IT ACTUALLY GETS MORE EXPENSIVE RIGHT INTO COMPOUNDS THE COST SO PEOPLE THAT THE REASON I BRING THAT UP IS BECAUSE, UM, THESE THESE SPOTS ONE THING TO REMEMBER ALSO OH, IS THAT THEY'LL HAVE A HIGH TURN AROUND. SO THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THAT COME AND USE THEM FOR BUSINESSES , YOU KNOW, LIKE A COFFEE SHOP THAT WE HAVE DOWNTOWN OR, YOU KNOW, A RESTAURANT. SOMEBODY COMING IN TO PICK UP FOOD OR WHATEVER IT IS THEY WERE PLANNING ON STAYING IN A PARKING SPOT FOR MAYBE 5 10 MINUTES ANYWAY, AND IF THEY COME WITH THEIR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CARS AND STARTING IN 2023, WE'RE GOING TO SEE A MASSIVE PRODUCTION CHANGE, UM IN THE LINE AND HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE BUYING. IT'S COMPOUNDING EVERY YEAR TO THE POINT WHERE AND I SAID THIS IN MY PRESENTATION FEW WEEKS BACK THAT FLORIDA IS EXPECTED TO JUMP FROM, UM, REALLY LESS THAN 1% IT'S LIKE HALF A PERCENT 1% OF THE OWNERSHIP STATEWIDE TWO BY 2031 OUT OF EVERY 5 20% OF PEOPLE WILL BE OWNING AN E V CAR THAT IS A MASSIVE CHANGE AND NOT TO SAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE IT HERE IN THAT PROPORTION GREATER OR LESS, BUT EVEN IF HALF THAT OCCURRED, THESE SPOTS WOULD BE I'M ASSUMING WELL, WELL UTILIZED BECAUSE THE ONES THAT KOALAS THAT WE HAVE THAT ARE FREE RIGHT NOW ALREADY ARE PRETTY HEAVILY MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SAY, UM PARDON, WHICH SAY THE. FOUR AND ADAM WHEN YOU BROUGHT

[03:15:06]

THAT UP, AND WE WERE GOING TO HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THESE CHARGES, I DIDN'T THINK THERE WASN'T MANY TESLAS HERE, BUT MY GRANDKIDS ARE COUNTING THEM NOW , AND I COULDN'T BELIEVE HOW MANY THEY ARE COUNTING. SO ANYWAY, IT'S A LOT MORE AND IN OUR TOURIST PROBABLY WILL. WE'LL BE DRIVING A LOT OF LIKE THEM. HOW MANY, MANY CHARGERS THAT WAWA AND CHIPS INSTALLED? 66 SO WHAT? WHAT DOES A LOT MORE SOPHISTICATED DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AND WE DO SO IF THEY SEE THE NEED FOR SIX? THAT'S BECAUSE THEY FEEL THEY CAN MAKE MONEY. UM AND I THINK BEN POINT YOU MAKE IT'S ACTUALLY GONNA TURN THESE OVER MORE QUICKLY. SO AND RESIDENTS WHO WON'T ELECTRIC CARS ARE ENTITLED TEMP PARKING DOWNTOWN, SO IT'S NOT A MATTER OF THEM BEING TAKEN FROM US AND THE GOOD NEWS IS THE THEIR MINIMUM FOR THEIR PROGRAM FOR F P L WAS FOR THEY ACTUALLY WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY TO OFFER US THE TWO BY DOING THEIR TRANSFORMER AND AGAIN, THE COMMISSION COULD GO EITHER WAY, BUT AT LEAST WITH THE SELFISH SPOT IF IN THE FUTURE WE SEE A REAL NEED, WE CAN EXPAND IT TO TWO MORE SO UM , NO, NOT WITH THE 10 YEAR WITH THE 10 YEAR. IT WOULD JUST SIT THERE, BUT THAT'S UNFORTUNATELY SOMETHING I CAN'T NEGOTIATE DOWN. COMMISSIONER COLLINS IS WONDERING IS CAN YOU START WITH TWO AT THE SAILFISH SITE? SAILFISH I CAN ALWAYS ASK, UM, BUT THAT'S BUT BECAUSE THEY'RE INSTALLING UM. A LITTLE BIT MORE EXPENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT THAT TRANSFORMER THAT YOU SEE THERE. I DON'T KNOW IF THE COST WORKS OUT FOR THEM, SO I CAN'T ANSWER THAT MYSELF. HOLD UP FOR ONE SECOND COMMISSIONER BRUNER IS MADE OF MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? OKAY OKAY. SO WE HAVE A SECOND. OKAY I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD THAT BECAUSE WE WERE GETTING KIND OF OUT OF TALKING OVER EACH OTHER. SO, UM, OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? MHM MARC BRICKMAN, 28 SOUTHEAST OSCEOLA STREETS. STUART FLORIDA 34994. WE HAVE NO BUSINESS BEING IN THE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY WHILE I WAS HAS WON BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY CAN MAKE MONEY OFF OF THEIR CONVENIENCE STORE. ANYBODY THAT'S DEALT WITH GAS STATIONS KNOW THAT GAS STATIONS DON'T MAKE MONEY OFF OF GAS. THEY MAKE MONEY OFF OF THIS STUFF THEY SELL. AND HERE WE'RE OUT THERE GOING TO GET INTO AN INDUSTRY WE KNOW NO IDEA HOW YOU MAKE MONEY IN IT, AND WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO PROVIDE THIS AND WE'RE BASING IT ON A TECHNOLOGY THAT EXISTS TODAY THAT WE ALL KNOW WON'T EXIST THREE YEARS FROM NOW, THOSE BATTERIES THAT WE'RE USING TODAY ARE BEING CHARGED WITH THESE CHARGING STATIONS WON'T BE THE SAME BATTERIES THAT ARE BEING USED THREE YEARS FROM NOW BECAUSE THAT TECHNOLOGY IS STILL RAPIDLY CHANGING. I JUST DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY BUSINESS BEING IN THAT. FURTHERMORE, I WOULD SAY FOUR PARKING SPACES ARE WORTH ABOUT $9600 A YEAR. SO WE'RE IT'S COSTING US $96,000. TO DO THIS. BESIDES WHATEVER WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH, WITH FP AND L , SO IT'S NOT FREE THOSE PARKING SPACES AND TRUST ME. I RENT THEM FOR $200 A SPACE SO I KNOW THAT THEY'RE WORTH $200 EACH $100 A MONTH. $9600 A YEAR 96,000 OVER OVER A 10 YEAR PERIOD, SO I JUST THINK WE SHOULDN'T BE IN THAT BUSINESS. BUT I THOUGHT THAT WAS FREE PARKING. IT'S SELFISH. IT IS. IT'S WE DON'T CHARGE FOR PARKING THERE AND. GONNA SAY INTO CLARIFY ALSO ABOUT UM ABOUT THAT, IF FOR WHATEVER REASON, MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE AGREEMENT AND WE WERE GIVEN A DRAFT AGREEMENT. JUST PRELIMINARY. UM IS THAT IF, FOR EXAMPLE, TECHNOLOGY WERE TO CHANGE F PL HAS BASICALLY THE RIGHT TO GO IN THERE AND SWITCH ANYTHING OUT AS FAR AS THE STATION, SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING SORRY. WHAT WAS THAT MAN BE INSTALLED? THE ESTIMATE THEY GAVE US WAS BETWEEN SEVEN AND 12 MONTHS BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO GO TO ENGINEERING DESIGN SO WITHIN A YEAR, SO WE'RE HERE IN PUBLIC COMMENT RIGHT NOW OF OUR SLACK. NOT A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF STEWART, SO I APOLOGIZE FOR TAKING UP MIKE TIME HERE, BUT I'LL GIVE YOU A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE FROM ST LUCIE COUNTY. INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE IS FOR PIERCE CAMPUS HAS HAD. TWO EIGHT YEARS, MAYBE LONGER. THEY'RE ALMOST ALWAYS FORM. THAT'S WHEN A COLLEGE CAMPUS STUDENTS. INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE HAS TWO ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS ADJACENT TO THEIR LEAD CERTIFIED CLASSROOM BUILDING. THEY'RE ALMOST ALWAYS FULL. THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE FOR EIGHT YEARS. GIVE OR TAKE. WE HAVE FIVE E V CHARGING STATIONS IN DOWNTOWN FORT PIERCE. IT'S A CRAPSHOOT, WHETHER YOU CAN GET A SPACE OR NOT, AND WE DON'T HAVE NEARLY

[03:20:03]

THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE DRIVER SHIP THAT YOU GUYS HAVE HERE IN MARTIN COUNTY. SO AS WE LOOK FORWARD AS WE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE INCENTIVES PROVIDED THROUGH THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT, YOU WILL SEE A VAST INCREASE IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE DRIVERS AND OWNERS. AND I DON'T THINK YOU'LL SEE THOSE SPACES BE EMPTY FOR LONG. THEY'RE THEY'RE IN HIGH DEMAND. I'VE BEEN DRIVING A PLUG IN HYBRID SINCE 2013. I STRUGGLED TO FIND SPACES TO PLUG MY VEHICLE IN FOR YEARS. WE'RE FINALLY STARTING TO SEE SOME SPACES. SO IF YOU GUYS MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, NOT ONLY SHOULD YOU MAXIMIZE WHAT YOU HAVE, WHICH SHOULD PROVIDE THE GREATEST FLEXIBILITY WITH THE TYPE OF PLUG THAT YOU PLUG INTO THE VEHICLE. SO TALK TO FP AND L ABOUT WHAT TYPE OF CHARGER THEY'RE GOING TO USE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH AS MANY VEHICLES AS POSSIBLE.

THANK YOU ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT AND MAKES YOU ROBERT VICTORY? FILL OUT A GREEN CARD, PLEASE? ROBERT HAMILTON'S 3 11 SOUTHWEST SURGERY. UM MY OBJECTION WOULD BE. THIS IS A FLORIDA CORPORATION FOR PROFIT. USING UTILIZING CITY PROPERTY PAID FOR BY ALL THE TAXPAYERS IN THIS ROOM. I'M NOT SAYING THERE'S NOT A TIME GOING TO COME AND WE'RE GOING TO NEED THAT, BUT I THINK THE CITY SHOULD BENEFIT OFF IT. YOU KNOW, I'M SORRY FOR YOUR POSITION, BUT THE CITY SHOULD NOT BE UTILIZING FOR PARKING SPOTS. WE HAVE A HARD TIME DOWNTOWN. I LIVE ON THIRD STREET. I KNOW AND I JUST DON'T FEEL THAT ARE TAXPAYERS SHOULD BE FUNDING FOR FP AND L TO PUT MONEY IN THEIR POCKET. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. DO WE HAVE A TRAM STATION DOWN THERE? OUTSIDE THE PARKING THEN WE HAVE A TRAM AGAIN. THERE'S A TRAM STATION AND YES, OKAY, BEFORE WE WILL CLASSIC QUESTION I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE AS I WAS THINKING WHILE THEY WERE SECOND IN OR SOMETHING. SO THEN I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT THIS AND I HAD THIS QUESTION AND I DIDN'T REALLY ASK IT. SO WE HAD MENTIONED ABOUT PRIVATE PERSONS HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THEIR BUSINESS OR WHETHER IT'S A WALL LAWS OR SOMETHING. OR JUST A PERSON WHO HAS LAND AND SAYS HERE, WANNA GET A PERMIT TO DO A TV STATION AND HAVE IT AS A BUSINESS WHERE PEOPLE COME AND CHARGE UP? UM AND I'M JUST TRYING, AND I SEE NOW THAT PEOPLE ARE STILL THINKING LIKE THAT, AND I KNOW THAT WE'RE TRYING TO FACILITATE AND MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE IT AVAILABLE IN OUR CITIES SO THAT WE CAN YOU KNOW, ACCOMMODATE PEOPLE WHO HAVE A VEHICLE, BUT, UM, I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE ANYTHING IN OUR COURT OR ANYTHING, MR. THAT WOULD STOP SOMEBODY OR WOULD ALLOW SOMEBODY TO SAY I WANT TO OPEN UP A BUSINESS AND HAVE IT BE A PLACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN COME PART THEIR CAR AND DO A TV YOU COULD DO. YOU COULD DO AN RFP. OUR PROCUREMENT WOULD NORMALLY HAVE YOU DO AN RFP. WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS INSTANCE? I BELIEVE IT WAS COMMISSIONER. MCDONALD ORIGINALLY BROUGHT UP THE ISSUE ABOUT PROVIDING IT AS A PUBLIC BENEFIT. TO THE COMMUNITY, WHICH , IF IN FACT IT'S BEING DETERMINED BY THE BOARD THAT IT PROVIDES A PUBLIC BENEFIT.

YOU'RE SAYING THAT YOU'RE STEPPING OUTSIDE OF THAT? IT'S JUST LIKE PAYING SOMEBODY TO OPERATE THE BEACH RESTAURANT FOR THE COUNTY OR SOMEBODY TO PROVIDE THE GREENMARKET OR WHATEVER. IT'S A IT'S A PUBLIC BENEFIT IN USE COUNT CITY PROPERTY. FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING THAT PUBLIC BENEFIT AND NOT BE IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE SEVEN SECTION 10 OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT SAYS THAT YOU CAN'T IGNORE SPECIAL BENEFIT ON A PRIVATE ENTITY. SOMEONE CAN'T JUST COME SET UP THERE THAT THEY COULDN'T JUST SET UP AND THEY DON'T IT DOESN'T GIVE THEM THE RIGHT TO DO IT. WHAT I'M HEARING IS, THE BOARD IS SAYING THEY'RE FINDING A BALANCE BETWEEN THE COST OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HAS TO BE ENCOURAGED TO PUT IT THERE AND THE NEED FOR THE CITY OF STEWART TO PROVIDE ELECTRIC VEHICLE OWNERS A MEANS TO CHARGE IN THIS LOCATION. TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF THE PUBLIC, PRIVATE OR PUBLIC PROPERTY IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS USED THAT WAY. OKAY? OKAY SO THANK YOU. WE'VE HAD SO WE'VE HAD PUBLIC COMMENT. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CALL THE QUESTION. SHE'S SICK. YES. YES TO THE FOUR THINGS THAT BAKER SAID. HE SAID FOUR PARKING RIGHT , SELFISH COMMISSIONER COLLINS NO. MAYOR MCDONALD. YES, COMMISSIONER RICH? YES. OKAY.

[11. ZONING IN PROGRESS DISCUSSION]

LET'S MOVE ON TO THE REMINGTON. I GUESS. TECHNICALLY, THAT'S WELL FINAL ITEM. BUT ZONING IN PROGRESS DISCUSSION. SO UH, YOU GONNA HANDLE THIS HANDLING AND I BELIEVE, UH, ESSENTIALLY, UM IN THE LAST MEETING, THE LAST CITY COMMISSION MEETING THE SPECIAL MEETING, THE COMMISSION ASKED THE CITY TO BRING BACK A ZONING IN PROGRESS DISCUSSION FOR THE OCTOBER MEETING. BUT BECAUSE

[03:25:03]

TONIGHT'S MEETING HAD THE FOREIGN BASED LIGHT FOR ITS AGENDA, AND IT WAS GOING TO BE A LIGHT MEETING, THE CITY MANAGER ASKED ME TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE TONIGHT. I ONLY HAVE ABOUT AN HOUR AND 45 MINUTES OF STUFF TO GO OVER. UM THE PURPOSE FOR IT IS REALLY TO PROVIDE THE COMMISSIONERS WITH SOME DIRECTION AS TO WHAT IN FACT IS A ZONING IN PROGRESS VERSUS WHAT IS A, UM MORATORIUM. AND. TO EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENT FACT THE COMMISSION ISN'T INTERESTED IN HAVING US BRING BACK OR MOVE FORWARD ON A ZONING AND PROGRESS IN THE CITY. BASED ON THE DISCUSSIONS AT THE LAST MEETING, IT WAS DIRECTLY RELATED TO, UM MULTI FAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. UM, IT. WE WERE, I WOULD NEED DIRECTION AS TO WHAT YOU WANTED TO BRING BACK IF IN FACT WE WERE GOING TO DO SO. THE WAY IT WORKS IS THAT IF WE COULD BRING A ZONING IN PROGRESS BACK AT THE NEXT MEETING, AND IT WAS A DIRECT WITH THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION AT SUCH TIME AS WE MADE ADVERTISEMENT THAT WE'RE GOING OUT TO THE ZONING AND PROGRESS, IT WOULD BECOME EFFECTIVE THAN ANY APPLICATIONS THAT WE RECEIVE. IN THE CITY FROM THE DATE OF THAT ADDRESS OR ADVERTISEMENT FORWARD. WOULD FALL UNDER THE ZONING IN PROGRESS, AND ULTIMATELY IF THE COMMISSION ADOPTED NEW ZONING AS IT PERTAINED TO THAT ISSUE. THOSE APPLICATIONS WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THAT NEW ZONING. EXAMPLE OF THAT BEING IF THE ZONING IN PROGRESS WERE RELATED TO MULTI FAMILY AND THE COMMISSION SAID. THERE'S NEVER GONNA BE ANY MORE MULTI FAMILY AND THAT'S WHAT THE ZONING IN PROGRESSES. THEN AT THE END OF THE ZONING IN PROGRESS, ANY OF THOSE MULTI FAMILY APPLICATIONS RECEIVED DURING THAT TIME WOULD HAVE TO NOT HAVE MULTI FAMILY ON THEM. HOWEVER IN ORDER TO BRING BACK A SPECIFIC ZONING IN PROGRESS OR VERSUS A MORATORIUM.

MORATORIUM WOULD BE WHERE WE DON'T. TAKE ANY ACTION OR RECEIVE ANY APPLICATIONS FOR ANY APPROVALS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE COMMISSION BELIEVES THAT THE CITY HAS THE ABILITY TO PROCESS ABSORB OR HANDLE THEM. ZONING IN PROGRESS FALLS MORE IN THE IDEA OF A PARTICULAR TYPE OF ZONING OR A PORTION OF OUR ZONING CODE. NEEDS ADJUSTING BECAUSE OF. WHATEVER FORCES HAVE CAUSED THE CITY TO REEVALUATE THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. I KNOW WHAT THE LAST MEETING THERE WAS. SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE HALF UNIT ISSUE. THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE UM, LARGE. MULTI FAMILY PROJECTS. THIS THIS WOULDN'T NECESSARILY APPLY TO LIKE A LAND USE CHANGE BECAUSE FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE CITY. UH, INVENTORY. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO LOOK AT FOR DESIGNING AND PROGRESS. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE IS RIGHT NOW. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WE HAVE LESS THAN TWO ACRES IN THE ENTIRE CITY THAT'S VACANT DESIGNATED FOR MULTI FAMILY, HOWEVER, AARON AND I WERE UNABLE TO FIND IT, SO I DON'T KNOW WHERE THE WHOLE IF THE TWO ACRES IS TOGETHER OR IS LIKE A SLIVER OF 100, FT, HERE AND 100 FT THERE AND WHAT IT MAKES UP. WE HAVE 130 ACRES. ZONED COMMERCIAL. AND IF THAT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY YOU CAN USE 25% OF THAT, FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AT 10 UNITS PER ACRE, SO THE 130 LET'S JUST SAY IT WAS 125 ACRES. THE OTHER 30, MAYBE SIX. SO IT'S MAYBE 31 ACRES AT 10 UNITS PER ACRE MEANS THAT IF ALL OF THE COMMERCIAL CAME IN AND WAS BUILT AT ITS 10 UNITS PER ACRE AT THE 25% RATE. THAT WOULD MEAN THERE'S SPACE FOR 310. UNITS IN ALL OF THE COMMERCIAL LEFT IN THE CITY. ADD THAT TO THE TWO ACRES OF MULTI FAMILY THAT YOU COULD YOU COULD DO THOSE 2 30 UNITS AN ACRE THAT MAYBE 60 THAT GIVE YOU 370 UNITS , NOT IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS IN THE NEXT 50 YEARS THAT COULD BE APPROVED ABSENT A MAJOR FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE. BY THE CITY COMMISSION. SO I'M NOT SURE WHICH ISSUE YOU WANT US TO COME FORWARD ON. BUT IF IT'S THE PROCESS THE U D PROCESS THE EXCEPTION. PROCESS ZONING RELATED TO PARKING EXCEPTIONS OR PARKING BALANCE. OR, AS I MENTIONED BEFORE THE NUMBERS I JUST GAVE YOU DID NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AT ALL BEHALF. RURAL THING, SO THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING YOU GUYS WOULD BE INTERESTED IN HAVING A SPRING BACK FOR HIS OWNING IN PROGRESS. BUT ESSENTIALLY IT. IT'S TO PROVIDE A STOP GAP IN THE TIME IT TAKES THE STAFF. FOR US TO BRING BACK NEW REGULATION TO REGULATE THAT ISSUE THAT THE COMMISSION FEELS NEEDS ADDITIONAL REGULATION. AND WITH THE STAFF REALLY KIND OF NEEDS FROM YOU IS DIRECTION. AND THAT'S THE QUESTION, I THINK.

OKAY. ALRIGHT BOY. I JUST WANTED TO WE'RE ALMOST BUILT OUT HERE IN THE CITY WILL BE THE FIRST SIX. 6.5 ACRES. UM KIM BEFORE WE MOVE ON. YOU CAN FIND OUT HOW MUCH VACANT LAND THAT WE HAVE.

[03:30:11]

AND THEN WE'LL GO. UM, SO IT'S NOT JUST VACANT LAND TO FINISH. YEAH I'M JUST CURIOUS. I NEED TO KNOW. YOU KNOW HOW MUCH YOU GOT A PAPER OVER HERE AND FIVE OVER THERE AND TEND THEIR HOW MUCH DO WE HAVE? BECAUSE WE ARE ALMOST BUILT OUT. THAT'S WHAT I'D LIKE TO KNOW. I MEAN, AND ANYWAY HOW MUCH WE HAVE IN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL THAT MULTI FAMILY COMMERCIAL OFFICE RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL I THINK THERE'S 13 OF THEM. YES UH, TACKY FOR THE RECORD. ERIN MALIKA, ACTING DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. ACCORDING TO OUR G, I S ANALYST WE HAD A TOTAL OF 203 VACANT ACRES LEFT IN THE CITY. NOW VACANT. UM THAT VACANT IS NOT THE TRUE VACANT THAT IS THE VACANT WITHOUT INVESTED ENTITLEMENTS. MIKE AND I WENT THROUGH AND WE WENT AHEAD AND WE LOOKED AT ALL THE CURRENT PROJECTS WITH ALL THE CURRENT APPROVALS ON IT, AND WE SUBTRACTED THOSE ACRES SO THERE MAY BE MORE VACANT ACREAGE THAT'S CURRENTLY IN THE PIPELINE AND APPROVED SO THAT'S VACANT AND AN ENTITLED OKAY. COMMISSIONER CLARK, MR. MARTEL THANK YOU FOR YOUR EXPLANATION.

ONE THING YOU KIND OF WENT AROUND BUT DIDN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY WAS A TIMEFRAME OF ANYTHING'S ON AN IN PROGRESS UP TO SIX MONTHS OR MORE TERM ZONING PROGRESS. WILL YOU KNOW THEY JUST GIVE THE ESTONIAN PLAYING WORDS THAT THE POTENTIAL TIMEFRAMES AND WHAT WILL BE THE IMPACT OF SOMETHING GOES INTO PLACE FOR THREE MONTHS OR SIX MONTHS. DOES ANYTHING GET ACCOMPLISHED DURING THAT TIME FRAME? IF THE COMMISSION ASKED ME TO ENTER A ZONING IN PROGRESS RELATED TO THE HALF UNIT. REGULATION. I WOULD HAVE IT BACK BEFORE THE COMMISSION FOR SECOND READING BEFORE THE END OF NOVEMBER. AND AS A RESULT, WE WOULD NEVER EVEN REACHED OR COME CLOSE TO THE THREE MONTH REGULATION NECESSARY. WHAT THE CODE SAYS, IS THAT WE IF WE ANNOUNCE A ZONING IN PROGRESS, IT CAN BE EVERYTHING IS ESSENTIALLY STAYED FOR THREE MONTHS AND THEN IT CAN BE EXTENDED FOR AN ADDITIONAL THREE MONTHS OR UP TO SIX MONTHS. SO THAT THE CITY CAN REWRITE THE CODE. THE REALITY OF IT IS THAT WE ARE NOT NEW YORK CITY. WE ARE A VERY SMALL PLACE. I CANNOT IMAGINE THAT IT WOULD TAKE US SIX MONTHS TO REWRITE A ZONING REGULATION IF THE COMMISSION HAD A CONSENSUS ON THAT REGULATION, AND AS A RESULT, IF WE HAD DIRECTION ON AN ISSUE, I SUSPECT WE WOULD HAVE IT. DONE BEFORE CHRISTMAS, AND IT WOULD BE OVER WITH SO WE WOULDN'T GET INTO THOSE TIMEFRAMES. BUT COMMISSIONER COLLEGE AND I, JUST AS IT RELATES TO THOSE TIMEFRAMES, WOULD IT REALLY IS, IS THE LANDOWNER BEING TOLD? IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU APPLY. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU DO. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET AN APPROVAL UNTIL THE ZONING IN PROGRESS AND IT'S TO TELL THEM IT'S NOT GOING TO LAST MORE THAN SIX MONTHS. BUT THAT'S NOT THE CASE. IT WON'T LAST THAT LONG. ANYWAY MR COLLINS. SO A COUPLE OF POINTS ONE IS, UM IT'S NOT JUST VACANT LAND THAT'S GOING TO BE POTENTIALLY DEVELOPED ON LIKE IN, YOU KNOW, DOWN SOUTH. YOU START TAKING THINGS THAT EXIST ALREADY. AND THEN YOU KNOCK THEM DOWN. CHANGE THE LAND USED TO DO THIS WHOLE ZONING THING AND YOU BUILD A HIGH DENSITY STUFF. SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT, UH, REDUCTIONIST TO SAY THIS IS HOW MUCH VACANT LAND WE HAVE, EVEN THOUGH IT'S CHEAPER, AND IT'S COST PROHIBITIVE TO DO UM YOU KNOW ON EXISTING. POTENTIALLY THE ONLY THING THAT'S WORTH DOING IT IS THE STUFF THAT MAKES A LOT OF MONEY LIKE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SO IT'S NOT JUST THE VACANT LAND TO IS. IT DOESN'T INCLUDE ANNEXATION. SO PART OF WHY ANNEXATION IS SO DESIRABLE IS TO GET THE INCREASE IN DENSITY THAT THE CITY PROVIDES.

SO PART OF THE CONVERSATION IS SO FOR ME. I'LL SPEAK FOR ME. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A ZONING IN PROGRESS. I THINK I'M MORATORIUM IS OVERKILL. I DO AGREE THAT WE COULD GET A LOT DONE AND NOT A LOT OF TIME. HALF DENSITY THING IS ONE. THERE'S OTHER ISSUES WITH CHANGES THAT WERE MADE TO THE COMP PLAN IN 2020 THAT I THINK THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. AND PART OF THAT IS HAVING A LITTLE BIT OF TIME TO WORKSHOPS SO THE PUBLIC CAN BE INVOLVED IN THAT CONVERSATION AS WELL. IT'S AH IT'S A LARGER CONVERSATION THAN EVEN JUST US DOING IT. I THINK THE PUBLIC HAS VERY LOUDLY , YOU KNOW, SHARED HOW THEY FEEL ABOUT WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON, AND THEY DESERVE TO HAVE A VOICE IN THAT AND WORKSHOP IN THOSE CHANGES TO THE COM PLAN, POTENTIALLY AND HOW WE DO OUR LAND USE, UM. SO WITHOUT GETTING INTO TOO MUCH DETAIL AND THE CHANGES I'D LIKE TO SEE YOU KNOW, INSTITUTE IN THE COMPLAINT. I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THAT ZONING AND PROGRESS TIME.

[03:35:02]

TO REVIEW THOSE THINGS. MAYBE WE GET BUTTONED UP AND IT'S IN LESS THAN THREE MONTHS, BUT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR COMPLAINT IS TIGHT THAT WE'RE ON THE SAME PAGE AND EVEN THAT THE CITY IS, UM ABLE TO HIRE THE STAFF. YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD PEOPLE LEAVE BUT HIRE THE STAFF THAT'S WERE ABLE TO GO IN A UNIFIED FRONT AND MOVE FORWARD. UM AS A COMMISSION AS A RESIDENTIAL BASE. YOU KNOW THE POPULATION HERE. STAFF WERE ON THE SAME PAGE WITH WHAT STEWART'S GOING TO BE IN TERMS OF THE VISION. UH KIND OF ADJUSTED, DOING WITH FORM BASED CODE. I THINK THAT'S A HUGE PART OF THAT, TOO, IS WHAT'S THE LOOK AND FEEL OF STEWART GOING TO BE GOING FORWARD. WHERE RIGHT NOW.

IT'S KIND OF THIS. NO OFFENSE TO THESE PROJECTS IF ONE OF THEM IS YOURS, BUT THERE IS A BIT OF A HODGEPODGE. IN MY OPINION OF THESE PROJECTS THEY DON'T NECESSARILY CARRY A UNIFIED LOOK AND FEEL, UM. AND THAT HAPPENS WITH THAT SORT OF LACK OF DISCIPLINE. I THINK IN THE COM PLAN WITH THE. LACK OF FORM BASED CODE IS THIS ONE OFF PROJECTS THROUGH THESE P U D PROCESSES END UP WITH SOMETHING THAT YOU KNOW THE PUBLIC DOESN'T NECESSARILY LIKE AND IT'S NOT HAPPY WITH SO I'M GONNA ASK A COUPLE QUESTIONS DECLARE FIVE FROM STAFF. I WANT TO SAY ONE MORE THING. I'M SORRY FOR ME PERSONALLY, I DON'T I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH TRYING TO BLOCK COMMERCIAL. SO I WANT TO SEE, UM COMMERCIAL SPACE BEING DEVELOPED . I WANT TO SEE MORE JOBS THAT ARE HIGHER PAYING FOR LOCALS. I THINK THE MAIN ISSUE FOR ME IS THE MULTI FAMILY THAT'S BEEN COMING IN THAT ENDS UP BEING IN THE HIGH UNITS BREAKER, SO AS LONG AS WE COULD BLOCK THAT PART OF THE COMMERCIAL, YOU KNOW, PED THAT MAYBE INCLUDES A MULTI FAMILY. UM, I WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU KNOW, INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMING THROUGH, AND THAT'S PART OF ONE OF MY BIG ISSUES WITH WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING IS THE CONVERSION AND LOSING OUR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO THESE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. SO A COUPLE OF THEY JUST DONE THE JUST ADDRESS THE COMMERCIAL ISSUE. WE'RE GOING TO BE SEEING AGENDA ITEM. I'M NOT SURE WHEN.

OH, THAT'S GOING TO BE LOOKING AT INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL SOMETHING I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH MICHELLE FOR QUITE A WHILE. SO WHICH IS MY GOAL IS APRIL LACK OF A BETTER WORD. PROTECT COMMERCIAL. SO UM, AS FAR AS THE ZONING AND PROGRESS. I DON'T THINK THAT REALLY APPLIES. I'M GOING TO ASK MIKE THIS TO COMPLAINT AMENDMENTS. WELL YOU CAN. I WAS GOING TO ASK THE QUESTION LIKE YES, YOU CAN ADDRESS A ZONING IN PROGRESS. IF IT'S A COMMON PLAN, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU COULD CHANGE THE HEIGHT LIMIT TO SEVEN STORIES OR TO ONE STORY, AND THAT WOULD BE A COMMON PLAN AMENDMENT. RIGHT RIGHT. BUT FROM A STANDPOINT OF LET'S USE THE HALF UNIT. THERE'S A REFERENCE TO THE HALF UNIT IN THE COM PLANTS. BUT THERE'S ALSO A REFERENCE TO THE HALF UNIT IN THE L D. R IF THE ZONING IN PROGRESS SAID NO. HAVE YOU DAMP APPLICATIONS AND WE JUST AMEND THE LBR TO TAKE IT OUT OF THE URBAN P U D APPLICATION PROCESS . THEN EVEN THOUGH IT'S STILL IN THE COM PLAN, THERE'S NO REMEDY TO GET TO IT. THROUGH THE ZONING ANYWAY, SO THEY CAN'T PLAN DOESN'T HAVE A DETRIMENTAL OR IMPACT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS YOU COULD DO A FULL COMPLEMENT EVALUATION AND YOU WOULDN'T NECESSARILY NEED TO ZONING IN PROGRESS, FOR EXAMPLE, THE COM PLAN SAYS. THAT YOU CAN GO UP TO 30 UNITS PER ACRE IN MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OR OVER 15 UNITS PER ACRE. IN MOST OF THOSE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES. YOU COULD DO A ZONING IN PROGRESS. AND ALTHOUGH THAT'S IN THE COM PLANT IF THE ZONING IN PROGRESS WAS TO SAY, WE DON'T WANT TO TAKE ANY APPLICATIONS FOR A PROJECT OF HIGHER THAN 15, 16, 17 2025 OR 30 UNITS, AN ACRE, UM DURING THE ZONING AND PROGRESS THAN ALTHOUGH IT RUNS WITH THE CAN'T PLAN, IT'S STILL IN THE ZONING CATEGORY. SO IT WOULD SAY WE'D BE ADJUSTING. THE LD R. IN SAYING OKAY IT DURING THIS PROCESS ONLY APPLICATIONS WITH DENSITY LEVELS BELOW. THE STANDARD. WHATEVER IS PROVIDED IN THE L D. R ARE ALLOWED TO BE SUBMITTED. IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD. SO THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING BECAUSE I WANT TO DO A NOTICE OF THE ZONING IN PROGRESS THAT YOU GUYS ARE ASKING FOR AND HAVE IT ACTUALLY MEANS SOMETHING AND DO SOMETHING I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IF THERE IS ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN A ZONING, THE PROGRESS AND THAT IS THE HALF UNIT BE TAKING THAT UP. AND UM, I WANT TO LIKE TO THOROUGHLY VET UM, HOW THAT UH, HOW WE COULD, UM, ACCOMPLISH SOME OF THE GOALS THAT BUT NOT LIKE I COULD HAVE UNITS. JUST GONNA I'M JUST GONNA PUT A LINE THROUGH. I MEAN, SERIOUSLY HARD GOLD, REASONABLE PRETENSE TO GO A LITTLE DEEPER

[03:40:02]

AND CAN WE THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE OFFER IS ONE. THAT'S WHAT STOPPED. RIGHT. SO IF YOU'RE GOING TO GO DEEPER, YOU NEED TO SAY WHAT IT IS. YOU'RE GOING TO GO DEEPER ON TO STOP. WHATEVER THAT IS. WE HAVE TO HAVE AN ITEMIZED ALL THE IDEAS AND WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO, BUT I HAVEN'T BEDDED HIM WITH STAFF BECAUSE I BECAUSE YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT JUST IT'S NOT JUST STRIKING THAT HALF UNIT OUT. IT'S ACTUALLY CREATING A TIERED LEVEL OF FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. I WANT TO ADDRESS THE MAYOR'S COMMENT ON THAT BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT YOU WANT TO DO, BUT IT'S TOTALLY CONTRADICTORY TO WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING, WHICH IS ELIMINATING THE HIGH DENSITY, MULTI FAMILY, WHICH IS WHAT I DIDN'T SAY. THAT'S WHAT IT ACCOMPLISHES. THAT'S I SAID IN MY MIND WHAT I SAID FOR ME PERSONALLY IS I DON'T LIKE TO HAVE ZONING THE HALF UNIT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S THE INTELLECTUALLY HONEST. I THINK IT'S INTELLECTUALLY, IT SAYS, AND I THINK THAT THE UNIT SIZES ARE WRONG. I THINK THAT THE UM AND I THINK THAT THERE'S AND I THINK IT SHOULD BE A TIERED APPROACH TO UNIT SIZES IN DIFFERENT DENSITY LEVELS BASED ON THE SIZE AND WE NEED TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION. PARKING AS TO HOW IT CAN GO. THAT IT THAT MAY NOT BE EXACTLY WHAT COMMISSIONER COLLINS WANTS. BUT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE I THINK WE'RE GONNA NEED TO THAT OUT AS A COMMISSION AS TO WHERE WE END UP. CERTAINLY WHEN WE'RE WITH WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO ACCOMPLISH WHEN WE FINISHED, WE WILL HAVE THE POSSIBILITY OF THE NUMBER OF TOTAL UNITS POSSIBLE OR OR, UH THAT IS POSSIBLE WITH THE HALF UNITS, WHICH CERTAINLY SHRINK PROBABLY DRAMATICALLY, BUT IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT HIGHER THAN IF WE JUST STRUCK IT. SO OKAY. THAT'S WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONING IN PROGRESS ANY APPLICATIONS THAT INCLUDED HALF UNITS WOULD BE STAYED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE ZONING IN PROGRESS WAS COMPLETE, SO AS TO INCORPORATE WHATEVER THOSE IDEAS , AND IF THE COMMISSION GOES A DIFFERENT DIRECTION. WHAT I WANT THAT LIMITATIONS, AND I THINK IT'S IMPERATIVE, THOUGH, THAT WE D S BIGGEST THING IS TRANSPARENCY. AND THAT AND ALSO THAT IT IT THAT IT ALSO HAS A, UM MORE OF APPROPRIATE NEXUS AS TO WHY WE'RE WHY IT WAS DONE VERSUS A BLANKET HALF UNIT. THAT'S JUST A GIANT. SO I'M NOT SITTING THERE SAYING THAT MR COLLINS AND THEN AND OBVIOUSLY IN THE PROCESS THAT'S WHAT WE BRING BACK. IT GOES TO THE L P A. AND THEY GIV COMMENTS. YOU GET FULL PRESENTATION, ETCETERA AS IT GOES THROUGH SO SORRY. SO JUST FINALLY FAR AS THE OTHER FIRST LAND USE CHANGES. THAT'S A POLICY DECISION. WE CAN JUST VOTE NO ON ANNEXATION, ALTHOUGH I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU SIT DOWN WITH MR MARTEL AND MR DIAZ DIDN'T GET A HISTORY OF ANNEXATION BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF MISINFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNEXATION AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE ANNEXATION COMPLETED IN THE CITY WAS DONE IN THE NINETIES. AND SINCE 2011 WHEN I INITIALLY CAME VERY LITTLE ANNEXATION HAS BEEN DONE . AND I CAN I CAN ALMOST I CAN. THERE'S ONLY ALMOST KIND OF ONE HAND. HOW MANY PARCELS WERE ANNEX? UM SO I THINK THAT UM. AND I THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE JUST USEFUL. FOR YOUR OWN EDUCATION JUST FOR ME. IF WE NEED TO ITEMIZE EVERYTHING, I WOULD SAY THE OTHER BIG ISSUE WHEN TALKING TO PEOPLE IS RESIDENTS IS, UH WHAT ENDS UP GETTING BUILT THE FRUIT OF THE TREE. ULTIMATELY WHAT ENDS UP EXISTING THERE IS NOT CONGRUENT WITH WHAT PEOPLE FEEL LIKE IS APPROPRIATE IN THE CITY OF STEWART. THEY DON'T FEEL LIKE IT MEETS A CHARACTER. SO PART OF THAT TO ME IS AND IT'S ALMOST SACRILEGIOUS TO SAY, BUT IT'S GOING BACK TO THE WANNI WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 30 UNITS PER ACRE. UM IF THE ULTIMATE FRUIT OF THAT ONCE WE'VE PACKED IT ALL IN AND AVOIDED GREEN SPACE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A LOT OF GREEN SPACES. NOW THESE 43 AND FOUR STORY BUILDINGS THAT PEOPLE DON'T SO YOU WANT TO GO? THAT WOULD BE PLAN. PART OF WHAT I'M SAYING IS, UM SCALING BACK ON OUR DENSITY WITH WITHIN THE PD PROCESS AND LOOKING MORE LIKE STRAIGHT ZONING IN TERMS OF THE DENSITY. SO LIKE FOR INSTANCE, UM IF YOU BUY A PIECE OF, YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL PROPERTY AND YOU'RE WANTING TO GET THAT FLIPPED AND BE RESIDENTIAL, AND PREVIOUSLY THAT PROPERTY WAS, UM , MULTI FAMILY AT A MAXIMUM OF 7 TO 10 UNITS PER ACRE. BUT THROUGH OUR P U D PROCESS, YOU GET A LICENSE TO GET UP TO 30 RIGHT IN THIS IN THIS WAY THAT WE DO THIS NOW. UM TO ME, THAT IS THAT IS AT THE ROOT OF WHAT'S

[03:45:05]

CAUSING. UH THE RIFT WITH WITH WHAT PEOPLE ARE SEEING IN THAT DISSATISFACTION SO POTENTIALLY SCALING BACK OUR DENSITY ALLOWANCES FOR WHAT WE OFFER EVEN WITHIN A PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, AND PART OF THAT I BELIEVE IS GOING TO BE WITH JUSTIN IS DOING THE FORM BASED CODE WHERE IT'S VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, IF WHAT IS BUILT ARE THESE FOUR STORY BOXES? UM THAT ARE IN MOST OF OUR MINDS OVERLY DENSE IN AN APPROPRIATE FOR STEWART DENSITY IS PART OF THAT . SO TAKING IT BACK TO 15. WHY DO WE NEED TO HAVE 30 UNITS PER ACRE? AND THESE PROJECTS, YOU KNOW WOULD BE THE IDEA BECAUSE THAT'S PREVIOUSLY WHAT WAY AND I THINK THAT WOULD CURTAIL A LOT OF THE DESIRE TO ANNEX FOR DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO GET AS MANY UNITS PER ACRE AS THEY CAN. AND IT'S DIFFICULT IN THE CITY. THE ONLY GET EIGHT AND THEN NOW THEY CAN GET 15 BECAUSE THEY'RE IN THE CITY AND THE CITY WILL LET HIM GO THROUGH PUDU AND END UP WITH 30 UNITS PER ACRE THAT THAT IS. THAT IS PART OF THE, UM THE DRAW, SO IT'S SCALING THAT BACK TO WHERE IT'S MORE MORE. I THINK THAT, UH, MY DEMONIC CONCERNS HERE ONE IS THAT, UH IS THAT ONE IS WE IF THEY CAN'T PLAN ALLOWS SOMEONE TO GO TO 30 UNITS AN ACRE THROUGH P U D AND WE SAY NO MORE FOR YOU D S 15. I'M CONCERNED THAT WOULD BE A TAKING UNDER THE BIRD HARRIS PLUS BECAUSE THERE IS THE OPTION TO GO TO ZONING YOU HAVE 15. IT'S AN ALLOWANCE THAT WE GIVE TO GO TO THROW. IT WAS IF YOU LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF TRUE IF YOU LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THE CITY OF STEWART, WHAT THEY WHEN YOU TALK TO WHEN I TALKED TO MR MARTEL AND PEOPLE THAT WERE DONE IN THE NINETIES, WHEN THEY CREATED OUT OF THIS, IT WAS THAT THE THEY WANTED TO BUILD TO DO 30, BUT THEY WANTED TO DO INSTEAD OF 15. THEY DID THE 15 P U D AND MY CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG WAS THAT UM WAS THAT THIS WAY, THE CITY COULD HAVE A BITE AT THE APPLE TO EXTRACT DIFFERENT AMENITIES AND MORE BENEFIT BUT SHOULD BE A PART OF OUR FORM BASED CODE IS WHAT THOSE AMENITIES ARE. WE WANT BETTER DRAINAGE. IF WE WANT MORE NATIVES, THAT SHOULD BE A PART OF THAT FORM BASED CODE. AND NOT WITH THAT WE HAVE TO TRADE A BUNCH OF DENSITY THAT WE DON'T NECESSARILY WANT TAKING. TAKING IS NOT GOING TO BE CREATED IN IT . THERE WILL NOT BE A LAWSUIT FOR A TAKING IN A ZONING AND PROGRESS BECAUSE IT WON'T LAST LONG ENOUGH, NO MATTER WHAT. IF, AT THE END OF THE ZONING AND PROGRESS THE COMMISSION DECIDED THAT NO FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE OVER 15 UNITS PER ACRE. THEN. THE ONLY WAY THAT A LANDOWNER COULD SUE THE CITY FOR TAKING IS THAT THEY COULD DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY HAD A VESTED PROPERTY INTEREST THAT WAS TAKEN AWAY OR LOST A SUBSTANTIAL USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. THE MATTER WOULD HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. BUT MOST EXPECTATIONS ARE THAT THEY'RE UP TO 15 UNITS PER ACRE BASED UPON THE ZONING OR ELSE THEY WOULDN'T BE BEFORE THE COMMISSION ASKING TO DEVIATE FOR 30. NOW WHAT? I SAID THE COMMISSION WITHOUT A DOUBT, WROTE THE CODE. THEY WANTED TO ADOPT A STREET 30 UNITS PER ACRE. BUT THEY ADOPTED THE CODE TO MAKE IT SO THAT THEY WOULD GRANT IT AND IT WAS INTENDED THAT THE COMMISSION DID GRANT THE 30 UNITS AN ACRE. AND IN FACT, WHEN YOU SEND STUFF TO THE STATE FOR REVIEW, THEY SAY YOU SHOULD EXPECT TO BUILD AT YOUR MAXIMUM DENSITIES. BUT THE CITY CAPTAINS MAXIMUM DENSITIES AT 15 WITH THE ALTERNATIVE TO GO TO 30. ON TOP OF THAT, THE TRUE PLANNING OF THE CITY AND THE COMPLIMENT REVIEWS WERE ALL TO FALL IN THE 25 TO 30 UNITS PER ACRE AREA, BUT THE ACTUAL VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE THE SAME THING AS THE UH, FOURTH STORY WHEN THEY STOPPED DOWNTOWN IN 2001, AND SAID FOUR STORIES COULD ONLY GO TO THREE STORIES. IT WAS DETERMINED BY CARL COFFIN THAT THAT WASN'T TOO TAKING BECAUSE THERE'S STILL A SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY INTEREST, AND THEY WERE STILL ENTITLED TO THEIR VALUES. AND THEN THEY WENT ON AROUND THE WHEN I SAY DOWNTOWN, THESE TWO STREETS, AND THEN THEY DID THE ENTIRE DOWNTOWN URBAN THEY OVERLAY ZONE AND SAID, YOU CAN ONLY GO TO FOUR STORIES IF ONE OF THEM INCLUDES A RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT TO IT, WHICH AGAIN ALLOWED THEM TO USE IS THE QUESTION WOULD BECOME IF YOU WENT TO 15 UNITS PER ACRE. FIRST, WE ONLY HAVE TWO ACRES OF LAND THAT ARE 100% MULTI FAMILY. SO THE EXPECTATIONS OF 30 UNITS AN ACRE CANNOT BE A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER THAT OWNS 10 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL COULDN'T SUE THE CITY AND SAY I WAS ENTITLED TO 30 UNITS PER ACRE TIMES 10 ACRES OR 300 UNITS BECAUSE THAT WASN'T MULTI

[03:50:04]

FAMILIES OWNING THE PERSON PURPOSE FOR MENTIONING THE INVENTORY AT THE BEGINNING TONIGHT IS THAT LOOK THERE THERE . NOBODY HAS ANY LAND LEFT IN THE CITY OF STEWART. THAT HAS 30 UNITS AN ACRE ON IT BECAUSE THE MULTI FAMILIES ALL GONE THERE ISN'T ANY LEFT DOESN'T EXIST ANYMORE. THE REST OF THE LAND. IS DISCRETIONARY BY BOARD MEANS AND SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS MAYBE REALITY IS AT THE END OF IT THAT THERE ISN'T ANY BUT WHAT PART OF THE INVENTORY SHOWS IS THAT? THE CITY DOESN'T ACTUALLY HAVE A LAND USE CALLED MULTI FAMILY ANYMORE, BUT IT MAKES IT FAR LESS ATTRACTIVE TO KNOCK DOWN EXISTING STRUCTURE. IF YOU CAN'T BUILD 30 UNITS PER ACRE ON IT, DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, EVEN BY REZONING. IF YOU'RE MAX OUT OF 15, IT'S COST PROHIBITIVE THE REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER RIGHT NOW. IF THEY KNOCKED DOWN A COMMERCIAL BUILDING THAT HAD COMMERCIAL ZONING. WOULD NOT BE THAT THEY COULD DO 100. RESIDENTIAL THEY WOULD NEED A LAND USE CHANGE. THAT IS WHY SEVERAL OF THESE DEVELOPERS HAD COME IN AND SAW THE LAND USE CHANGE WHEN YOU LOOK AT A ZONING IN PROGRESS. YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO. APPLY A LAND USE CHANGED. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO LOOK AT YOUR COM PLAN AND BASE IT ON. WHAT IS THE REALITY OF THIS COM PLAN? RIGHT NOW? IT IS NOT BASED UPON WHAT IF WE TAKE AND CHANGE ALL THE LAND USES IN THE CITY TO MULTI FAMILY, THEN WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN? BECAUSE THAT'S NOT THE WAY PLANNING WORKS. IT'S BASED UPON YOUR COMP PLAN. HOW MANY LAND USES OF MULTI FAMILY DO YOU HAVE? DO YOU WANT THAT TO BE 30 UNITS AN ACRE AND OUR INSTANCE IT'S ESSENTIALLY ZERO. THE NEXT ONE IS OKAY. HOW MANY OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES DO YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW UNDER OUR COMP PLAN WITHOUT A FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE. MOST OF THOSE COMMERCIAL USES ARE OUTSIDE OF THE DOWNTOWN URBAN OVERLAY ZONES AND ONLY ALLOWED UP TO 10 UNITS PER ACRE. THEY'RE NOT EVEN THE 15 UNITS PER ACRE PROPERTIES, SO IT'S A COMPLICATED INVENTORY DISCUSSION ALSO JUST WANT TO ADD THAT THE PROJECTS THAT WE'VE APPROVED. WE'RE TALKING LIKE WE'VE APPROVED ALL THESE PROJECTS AT 30 YEARS AN ACRE, WHICH IS NOT TRUE. THERE'S ONLY TWO UNITS TO PROJECTS ARE APPROVED. 30 YEARS MAKER. MOST OF THEM ARE CLOSE TO 20. BRIDGEVIEW WAS 13. I MEAN, THERE'S NOT YOU KNOW, IT'S THE SAME LIST THAT I'D SAY YOU GUYS MHM. YEAH, IT WAS COSTCO. SO THAT'S OKAY. BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THAT CAN OF WORMS, RIGHT? WE'RE COUNTING THE SPACE THAT COSTCO SITS ON AS PART OF THAT ACREAGE, RIGHT? SO YOU'RE PACKING ALL THESE APARTMENTS? ACRES AND YOU'RE SAYING, UM, YEAH, THERE'S SO MANY PER ACRE, BUT WE'RE TAKING ALL OF THAT AND PUTTING IT RIGHT HERE. I DON'T THINK THAT'S COMPLETELY IT'S NOT DISHONEST, BUT IT'S A LITTLE BIT REDUCTIONIST. IT'S ALSO THAT THAT WAS A ACTUALLY A PLANNING DIRECTION THAT IS PROVIDED AS AS LONG AGO AS THE 19 2097 AND THEN 2003 EVEN LEAH DEVELOPMENTS. WHAT THEY SAID IS OKAY. TAKE YOUR GREEN SPACE AND PUT IT ALL INTO ONE BIG GIANT WETLAND AREA AND HAVE THEM ALL CONTRIBUTE TO THE ONE BIG AREA AND THEN GIVE THOSE DENSITY CREDITS AND PUSH THEM OUT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AREAS SO THAT YOU CAN PRESERVE MORE IN THAT WETLAND AREA, WHICH IS WHAT THEY DIDN'T HAVING. LEAH OR THE COUNTY RECENTLY DID THAT IN THE KIPLINGER THING WHERE THEY SAID, LOOK, WE'RE GOING TO SHIFT ALL THE DENSITY. TO THE BOTTOM 30% AND WE'RE GONNA PRESERVE THAT OTHER 70% AND AS A RESULT, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING WE COULD PUT COMMISSIONER CAN'T BE UP HERE IF WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT, BUT THEY PROBABLY HAD ENOUGH TALKING ABOUT THAT BELIEVE IT'S STILL HERE. BUT IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT IN THERE'S THAT YOU THAT THAT PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT. THE MINIMUM THEY'RE NOT A MAXIMUM DENSITY PROJECT.

THERE ARE MINIMUM DENSITY PROJECT AND I WAS TALKING TO SOME PEOPLE THAT WERE WRITING PART OF THAT CODE AND IN ORDER TO GET APPROVAL IN THAT SPECIAL DISTRICT, YOU HAVE TO COME IN WITH A MINIMUM OF 32 UNITS AN ACRE. THE PURPOSE BEHIND THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THAT IS IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE BENEFIT TO THE LANDOWNER. TO SET ASIDE THAT OTHER 70% OF THE GREEN SPACE THEY NEEDED THE PILE OF INTENSITY UP IN THE CORNER KIND OF THING AGAIN. NOT THAT ANY OF THAT MATTERS THAT LATER. I HOPE IT'S SOMETHING WE LOOK BACK ON THAT WE USED TO DO. AND IT WAS A TERRIBLE IDEA. I KNOW WE'RE TRYING TO COMBAT SPRAWL. BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY IF WE JUST BUILD THESE BOXES AND EVERYBODY LIVES IN A BOX, AND NOBODY CAN OWN A YARD OR HAVE ANY PROPERTY, I THINK THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME MODEL IS NOT OUTDATED. I THINK WE SHOULD STRIVE FOR PEOPLE TO OWN HOMES. I KNOW IT'S NOT IN VOGUE ANYMORE, AND WE'VE BEEN DOING CARBON OUT GREEN SPACE AND PUTTING EVERYBODY IN APARTMENTS. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S MAKING SPACE FOR WHO WHO? WE EVEN REALLY I WANT TO MAKE SPACE FOR IN STUART. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH FAMILIES. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING ABLE TO PLANT A MANGO TREE IN YOUR YARD. UM AND IF WE LOOK AT WHAT'S BEEN

[03:55:05]

APPROVED THE LAST FOUR YEARS, IT'S ALL OF THE SAME MODEL OF THING. SO WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO IS GO ON THE EXACT OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THAT WE'VE BEEN VERY WELL OILED MACHINE. NO NO JUDGMENT, NO CRITICISM. WE'VE BEEN A VERY WELL OILED MACHINE AT DOING WHAT THIS THING THAT WE'VE BEEN DOING FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS. UNDER THE, UM INFLUENCE OF. OTHER PEOPLE WHO WERE UP HERE. CASH OF THAT AND TALKING RESIDENTS AND THE DISSATISFACTION. I THINK WE SHOULD MAKE CHANGES TO THE COMPLAINT AND HOW WE DO OUR LAND USE. AWAY FROM THAT TRAJECTORY AND TRY TO PULL BACK HAVE LOWER DENSITY. UM UM YOU KNOW, WATER SETBACKS. MORE GREEN SPACE. LOW DENSITY IS THE KEY AND FOR ME THAT 30 UNITS PER ACRE SEEMS TO BE THE MARROW EPICENTER OF THE DYSFUNCTION. IS IT ULTIMATELY COMBINED WITH THE MODEL OF LIKE FIGHTING SPRAWLS? UM YOU KNOW, WE GOTTA PACK ALL THE GREEN SPACE, BUT THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I'M TRYING TO ACHIEVE. IN THIS CONVERSATION, COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS RELATED TO OTHER ISSUES. I THINK I HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT I SHOULD COME BACK WITH. A COMMENT. YOU THANK YOU. SO I WAS I WAS GONNA ACTUALLY NOT COMMENT OR ANYTHING, BUT I DO HAVE A LOT OF NOTES. UM SO I'M JUST GONNA GO BACK TO, MR. UM COLLINS THAT WHAT YOU JUST FINISH WITH SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT? I'M JUST ASKING THEM TRYING TO SEE IF MR MORTAL HAS THE SAME POSITION. IF WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS SOMETHING ABOUT SOME TYPE OF BLANKET REZONING WERE NOT HAPPY WITH THIS OR RESIDENTS ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THIS. I DON'T THINK WE DO THAT KIND OF STUFF, BUT I'M JUST BRINGING IT UP THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE SAYING THAT AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT CAMPAIGN PROMISES OR WHAT IT IS THAT PEOPLE HAVE BROUGHT UP BUT IT SEEMS LIKE YOU'RE SAYING THAT IF THIS DOESN'T MATCH THIS, AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS. AND I THINK THAT MR MORTAL HAD SAID THAT IN ORDER TO DO SOMETHING, WE NEED TO HAVE SOME SPECIFIC THINGS. THESE ARE THIS IS A ONE LITTLE THING THAT I'M GOING TO SAY, WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE? MR MORTAL . I KNOW. YOU SAID THAT YOU KNEW THAT. WHAT WE WERE WHAT WE HAVE DONE. AND YOU DIDN'T EVEN HEAR FROM ME YET, BUT YOU THOUGHT THAT WE HAD ENOUGH DIRECTION TO GIVE YOU AND I'M ASKING IF THIS WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT MIGHT BE NECESSARY, OR MAYBE NOT. JUST LIKE WE'VE DONE THE HALF. UM THEY HAVE UNIT AND I THINK MR MCDONALD MENTIONED, UM, THE HALF UNIT AND YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT A TIERED APPROACH OR SOMETHING. SHOULD WE MEET WITH YOU INDIVIDUALLY OR PROVIDE SOME KIND OF LIST? IN ADDITION TO WHAT WE'VE DISCUSSED OF SOME THINGS THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED, UM ITEMS TO BE VETTED TO LOOK AT TO SAY THESE ARE VIABLE THINGS THAT COULD BE PUT IN A ZONING IN PROGRESS, AND THIS IS JUST ONE IDEA ONLY WENT TO ANSWER IT.

PLANNING ON DUMPING THIS ON SOMEONE ELSE SO YOU DON'T NEED TO OKAY WHICH WHICH WAS MY NEXT . THAT'S EXACTLY LEADING TO MY NEXT QUESTION. EARLY RATE NEXT QUESTION. IS THAT THAT MY NEXT QUESTION IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE A DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ONE. THAT'S GONNA START.

AND I WOULD LOVE I KNOW THAT WE HAVE CONSULTANTS AND WE WORKED WELL WITH DOLLAR CONSULTANTS IN THE PAST, BUT I AT LEAST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORS ON BOARD AND NO SOME STUFF BEFORE WE TRIED TO DO THIS , BUT THAT'S JUST I THINK I COULD STRAIGHTEN OUT FOR YOU.

LOOK, SHE'S JUST USING HALF UNIT THING. I KIND OF FELT THERE WAS A CONSENSUS TO DISCUSS THE HALF UNIT IN A ZONING AND PROGRESS. I CAN DRAFT AN AGENDA ITEM WITH THE ZONING IN PROGRESS WITH THIS HALF UNIT ISSUE ON IT AT THE DAY WE SET OUT THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR THAT AGENDA ITEM. HALF UNITS WILL BE NOT ACCEPTED BY ANYBODY MOVING FORWARD FOR AT LEAST THREE MONTHS, HOWEVER. AT THAT FOLLOWING MONDAY'S MEETING. IF THE COMMISSION CLARIFIES THAT. ZONING AND PROGRESS AND SAYS NO, MIKE, YOU GOT IT WRONG. WE WANT IT TO BE ONLY HALF UNITS ON EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD. THEN THE ZONING IN PROGRESS WAS GOING TO BE NO HARM. NO FOUL FOR FIVE DAYS. SO WHEN I SAY I HAVE A CONSENSUS OF THE ISSUES YOU WANT ME TO INCLUDE IN THE ZONING AND PROGRESS. I'M GOING TO PUT THEM IN THAT RESOLUTION, AND THERE'S GOING TO BE A FIVE DAY WINDOW WHERE I MIGHT HAVE OVERREACHED.

WHAT THE ULTIMATE CONSENSUS OF THE WHOLE COMMISSION WAS. UNTIL THAT COMMISSION MEETING TAKES PLACE ON THAT MONDAY, AT WHICH TIME YOU GUYS CAN ADJUST THOSE COMMENTS ACCORDINGLY. TWO YES, WHATEVER, AND THEN MOVINGUT OR FORWARD AFTER THAT, MONDAY NIGHT. THE ZONING IN PROGRESS WILL THEN LAST FOR 33 MONTHS, DURING WHICH TIME EVERYONE INDIVIDUALLY WILL MEET WITH THE

[04:00:07]

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR BONNIE OR OR WORKSHOP OR WHOEVER ELSE AND WE WILL GET ALL THIS DATA AND FEEDBACK AND COME BACK WITH A MEANINGFUL. ALTERATION OF THE CODE, BUT MULTI FAMILY, NOT JUST HALF UNIT THAT I HEARD YOU ON THE 15 YEARS. ELIZABETH IS NOT EVEN BUILT YET, RIGHT? PEOPLE DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND HOW DENSE THAT'S GOING TO BE WHAT THE HALF UNIT BUT PEOPLE ARE VERY MUCH UPSET WITH THE MULTI FAMILY THAT'S BEING BUILT IN MY EXAMPLE . I DON'T WANT TO HANG OUR HAT ON. I DON'T WANNA HANG OUR HAT ON JUST A HALF UNIT. MY NAME LEFT COMPLAINING ABOUT NOT ENOUGH APARTMENTS SO YEAH, SO AND I HAVEN'T FINISHED YET. SO THE OTHER THING GOING BACK TO PLANNING, WE'LL LOOK AT ALL THOSE THINGS A COUPLE OF THINGS. WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO IF WE NEED TO HAVE, EVEN IF IT'S NOT ZONE IN PROGRESS IF WE NEED TO HAVE AH, A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF P U. D S IN THE PLANNING PROCESS IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IN THE LIFE OF A CITY, THEN WE NEED TO DO THAT. SO THERE'S AN UNDERSTANDING NOT SAYING THAT IT'S ALL GOLDEN AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT IT'S ALL BAD, BUT TO THINK OF A P U D HAS BEEN ALL BAD WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE COST OF THE CITY OF CERTAIN INFRASTRUCTURE OF CERTAIN THINGS THAT ARE DEVELOPER MAYBE PUTTING IN AN OTHERWISE IT WOULD JUST SAY, HEY, WE DON'T HAVE TO DO IT. THIS IS WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO, AND IN FACT, WE'RE JUST GOING TO STICK AS MANY UNITS AS WE CAN BASED ON THE CURRENT ZONING, AND THAT'S IT. YOU'RE OUT OF IT, BUDDY. YOU WANTED THIS? THAT'S WHAT YOU GET. IF WE NEED TO HAVE THAT KIND OF WORKSHOP AND THAT DISCUSSION TO MAKE SURE THAT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE DOING. IF WE'RE I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING, BUT THAT'S JUST MY THING. MY OTHER THING IS UM, LIKE I SAID, WE DON'T GET TO TALK TO EACH OTHER.

THIS IS THE ONLY TIME WE DO IT. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING. WE HAD SUCH A GOOD EXAMPLE FROM THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL TONIGHT, AND I HAVE BEEN WHEN I STARTED THE, UM WHAT DID I START , DAVID? THEY THEY THEIR STRATEGIC PLANNING, AND WE HAD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN IN 2013. I THINK I WAS MAYOR. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AND WE'VE BEEN PUSHING THAT, BUT WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN LITTLE NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS FINALLY, AFTER HOW MANY YEARS WERE ACTUALLY PAYING ATTENTION TO OUR NEIGHBORHOODS, IF THAT'S WHAT WE NEED IS TO GET OUR PLANNING STAFF AND OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED WITH NEIGHBORHOOD. YES, WE HAVE THE TRIANGLE AREA THAT WE'VE LOOKED AT. WE HAVE THE CREEK, EAST STEWART AND WE HAVE EVEN WHEN WE WERE DISCUSSING EXPANDING THE C R A, UM, FURTHER SOUTH. WE HAD ALL THOSE KIND OF DISCUSSIONS. BUT IF WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS TO LOOK AT NEIGHBORHOODS OVER THE BRIDGE NEIGHBORHOODS, UM, NORTH OF EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD, WHATEVER IT IS THAT WE NEED TO DO. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING IS KEY, AND I KNOW THAT IT'S NOT NECESSARILY IN THE ZIP ZONING THING. BUT I HOPE THAT STAFF IS HERE AND ENLISTING. AND OF COURSE, OUR CITY MANAGER KNOWS THAT ALL THESE THINGS COST MORE TIME. MORE EFFORT. BUT IF THAT'S WHAT WE NEED AND IF THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO DO, I PROMISE PEOPLE ALSO WHEN I WAS BEING REELECTED, THAT I WOULD LISTEN TO THEM AND THAT WANT THEM TO HAVE A FORUM TO LET US KNOW SOME THINGS THAT ARE GOING ON IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. AND IF WE NEED TO LOOK MORE KEENLY AT SOME OF OUR LITTLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND BREAK THEM DOWN AND SPEND TIME QUARTERLY TO TALK ABOUT NEIGHBORHOODS AND TO TALK ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON, IF WE NEED TO PUT THAT AS A PART OF OUR PLANNING. UM UM AND DEVELOPMENT WAY OF THINKING AND STEWART. THEN LET'S DO THAT. BUT I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY TIME WITH A SPECIFIC THING IN THE ZIP, ZIP ZIP ZONING DISCUSSION, BUT IT REALLY BRINGS TO FRUIT BECAUSE WE DID TALK ABOUT NEIGHBORHOODS TONIGHT, AND I THINK PEOPLE LIKE THE IDEA OF LOOKING AT NEIGHBORHOODS AND LOOKING AT THE SENSE OF PLACE AND LOOKING AT HOW THINGS ARE CHANGING, AND EVEN JUST EXAMINE HOW OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS. WHAT THE HISTORY OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND WHAT THEY WANT TO SEE AND BRING THOSE NEIGHBORS OUT. NOT JUST THE PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. WE'VE BEEN DOING THAT FOR 25 YEARS WITH THE DO WANNA PLAN WE'VE BEEN LOOKING AT THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND THE COMMERCIAL AREA AND IF OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER AREAS NEED TO SEE WHAT'S GOING ON IN THEIR COMMUNITY AND IN THEIR AREA.

LET'S START THAT AS A PART OF OUR PLANNING MODE AND DEAL WITH IT AND WORK WITH IT. IT WON'T TAKE A DAY IT'S GOING TO TAKE ANOTHER 25 YEARS. SORRY I GOT ALL OF IT. BUT OKAY, MIKE, DO YOU THINK YOU HAVE YOUR MARCHING ORDERS? MR MAYOR? CAN I MAKE A COMMENT? YES, ABSOLUTELY.

BECAUSE I WAS ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL. I WAS THE FIRST TO BRING THIS UP AND JUST SPOKE ABOUT IT IN THE ZONING IN PROGRESS IS NOT AN END IN ITSELF. OF COURSE, THE ZONING IN PROGRESS THE IDEA IS TO PAUSE. SO THAT. AT LEAST THIS COMMISSION CAN VERY EASILY DEVELOP A CONSENSUS. WHICH WE CAN SEE HOW DIFFICULT THAT IS. THERE'S A LEARNING CURVE HERE AMONGST SOME OF US TO UNDERSTAND

[04:05:03]

THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DECISIONS WE MADE. COMMISSIONER CLARK BROUGHT UP A VERY GOOD POINT, WHICH YOU DID COMMISSIONER COLLEGE. YOU SAID, YOU ALSO WANTED TO GO OUT AND SPEAK TO PEOPLE. SO ON TOP OF DEVELOPING A CONSENSUS AMONGST HERSELF A TOP ON TOP ADAPTING FORM BASED CODE WE WANNA WHERE DO CHARETTE'S HAVE WORKSHOPS SO THAT THE PUBLIC CAN HAVE INPUT ON SOMEBODY'S REDS? AH! GEAR YOU'RE YOU'RE ASKING A LOT OF THE STAFF AT THE MOMENT AND OF OURSELVES, UM I JUST THINK WE NEED TO BE MORE SPECIFIC ABOUT THE TIME FRAME. IT WOULD DEPEND ON WHAT WE'RE PLANNING ON DOING. WELL, THAT'S UP TO US TO TELL THEM. FOR EXAMPLE, ONE THING HOG , YOU KNOW, WE REJECTED MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN THE CORNER OF INDIAN COMMERCE. SAYING WE WANTED JOBS THERE. WE WANTED INDUSTRY THERE. WE GOT WHAT WE WANTED AND HOG NOW. RIGHT IS IT WANTS TO GO ON THAT SITE? CORRECT AND WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO REZONE THAT. SO IF WE HAVE A IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO GO TO INDUSTRIAL IN IT. I THINK HE GONNA HAVE A COMMERCIAL USE FOR IT. IS HE I THINK SO. OKAY, BUT ISN'T HOUSING PERSON. YES SO I THINK WHAT HE CAN DO A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE WITH COMMERCIAL, BUT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT RIGHT AND THAT'S AND THAT TO YOUR POINT MISSIONER RICH IS THAT, UM IS THAT THAT'S WHAT I PRESENTED EARLIER REGARDING COMMERCIAL AND AN AGENDA ITEM THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE SEEING THAT I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH MICHELE WHICH IS TO REALLY LOOK AT ALL OF OUR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AND THOSE OPPORTUNITIES AND ALSO MOVED TO IDENTIFY TO ONE OF THE BIG THINGS WAS IDENTIFYING THEM. UM AND IT'S A AMOUNT OF WORK.

WHAT DO YOU SEE? IT'S BEEN FABULOUS. GOOD JOB, MICHELLE. SO BUT BUT IS IT SAFE TO SAY THAT NONE OF US UP HERE WANT TO ZONING IN PROGRESS TO IMPACT THOSE DECISIONS? OKAY ZONING IN PROGRESS IS JUST LIMITED TO RESIDENTIAL IMPACTS AT THIS POINT, AND IT'S NOT GOING TO IMPACT SINGLE FAMILY COMMERCIAL HAD MULTI FAMILY AS A PROPOSAL THAT WOULD BE A RESIDENTIAL IMPACT. IT'S NOT JUST RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY. IT'S AN APPLICATION THAT HAS A MULTI FAMILY. IMPACT AND I DON'T WANT TO BEAT THIS TO DEATH, BUT MAYBE A HANDFUL. I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT PERCENTAGE OF WHAT WE HAVE APPROVED IS EVEN INHABITED RIGHT THAT PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT. A LOT OF THESE THINGS ARE GOING TO BE. A LOT OF THESE STUDIES ARE GOING TO BE COMING UP FROM THE GROUND UP AND PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE SEEING THAT. AND THEY'RE NOT EVEN AWARE THAT THESE THINGS ARE APPROVED YET LIKE ELIZABETH SPRING TREE, THERE'S MORE OF THESE THAT ARE ON THE WAY YOU DON'T SEE, UM, FOR, YOU KNOW FLOORS YET, SO WHEN PEOPLE START TO SEE THAT THERE. I DON'T THINK WE WE'VE EVEN DEALT WITH THE FULL FRUSTRATION FROM RESIDENTS BECAUSE THEY DON'T EVEN FULLY KNOW WHAT'S IN THE PIPELINE. ALREADY. I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION . ORGANIZING YOUR WORKSHOPS. WE NEED TO HAVE A QUICK QUESTION. THE STATEMENT STATUTE REGARDING THE WITH INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL IT DOESN'T REQUIRE A LAND USE CHANGE IF THEY WANT TO DO. NO NO, SO RIGHT NOW, WE WOULD BLAME IT ON THE COUNTY, BUT BECAUSE I'M ACTUALLY WORRIED ABOUT THIS STATE STATUTE DOESN'T GIVE ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHTS. OKAY GOOD DONORS AT ALL. IT SAYS THAT A COMMISSION HAS THE RIGHT TO GRANT RESIDENTIAL USES IN ANY LAND USE, EVEN IF THE LAND USE DOESN'T NORMALLY ALLOW IT WITHOUT A LAND USE CHANGE IF, IN FACT THE RESIDENTIAL USES HAVE AT LEAST 10% OF THIS AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT WOULD WITHSTAND A CHALLENGE OF THE LAND USE ASSIGNMENT OR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOR VIOLATING THE CAN'T PLAN, BUT IT STILL REQUIRES. THE COMMISSION ITSELF TO DO IT. IT'S NOT A RIGHT COMES FROM THE OTHER SIDE THAT, UH, THAT'S ANOTHER CASE OF THE STATE. AH, COMING IN PREEMPTING US AND I'M I'LL TELL YOU I'M ACTUALLY VERY CONCERNED OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS IF WE CONTINUE TO SEE 3 TO 500,000 PEOPLE MOVING TO THE STATE WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BRING UP THIS UNDEVELOPED MINT, AND WE SHOULD DOUBLE DOWN NOW AND KEEP IT LOW DENSITY. HOWEVER, WE DON'T HAVE A CHOICE, BUT I MEAN THAT'S JUST IT'S JUST GONNA BE IT IT JUST BY THE WAY WE NEED TO FIGHT THE PREEMPTION. TO THE YOU KNOW, IT'S PROBABLY A DISCUSSION FOR ANOTHER DAY TO WRITE. THAT IS ANOTHER DISCUSSION, BUT IT'S 9 40. OKAY, SO UM ANY OTHER QUICK COMMENTS TO MICRO DAY BEFORE WE CALL IT A NIGHT APOLOGIZE FOR IN A LONG COMMENT SUBNET. NOW

[04:10:02]

YOU'RE GONNA POLICY. YEAH THANK YOU ALL FOR SECOND. SO THERE'S NO NEED FOR, UM, PUBLIC COMMENT , BUT IF PEOPLE SAT HERE TILL THE END AND THINK THAT A GOOD IDEA, IS THERE ANY COME PUBLIC YES, HE'S GOT HIS DIDN'T HAVE ANY GREEN CARDS IN FRONT OF ME. SO DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC OF IT? YOU KNOW WHAT, ON SECOND THOUGHT ? YEAH COME ON IN HIS UP. HE JUST KEEPS HIM WITH ME. JUST KEEP THAT WITH YOU ALL THE TIME. ERIC ERIC, WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR YOU. WHEN HE WAS WAITING TO SPEAK. ERIC LECTURE MY OWN TERROR FROM OTTO 26 6 STREET. UM BUT JUST BASICALLY OPPOSED ANYTHING. WHAT KEEPS PEOPLE FROM MOVING HERE BECAUSE I'M A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER. AND WHEN PEOPLE COME HERE, THEY SPEND MONEY. IT'S FOR BUSINESSES. IT HELPS, YOU KNOW. AND CUTTING DOWN ON.

WHAT WE BUILD TO SPEAK APARTMENT BOXES THAT YOU DON'T LIKE. THEY DON'T BOTHER ME, EXCEPT FOR ALL THE TRAFFIC THEY CAUSE, WHICH IS A BIG PART OF IT. BUT ONE THING WE DO NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

AND ONE THING WE COULD DO IS TAKE THOSE TWO BASEBALL FIELDS OVER THERE. AND PUT COUPLE 100 UNITS IN THERE. AND THAT WOULD PROVIDE THE AREA WITH A LOT OF RESIDENTS THAT WOULD SPEND MONEY. AND THOSE THOSE FIELDS ARE BARELY USED. AND THERE'S A BEAUTIFUL FACILITY HALF A MILE TO THE SOUTH OF THERE AND 10TH STREET. SO THAT'S JUST MY SUGGESTION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT?

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.