Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:06]

I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. UM MARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL OFF? MAYOR MCDONALD'S HERE? BRUNER HERE, CLARK. COLLINS. COMMISSIONER RICH HERE. I WOULD JUST LET THE RECORD NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER CLARK AND COMMISSIONER COLLINS AREN'T HERE TO SEE NOTE FROM COMMISSIONER COLLINS THAT HE WILL BE HERE AT 4 30. OKAY SO LET'S GET STARTED WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. PLEASE JOIN ME FOR A MOMENT OF SILENCE, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE.

THANK YOU. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE. TO THE FLOOR. OKAY? PATIENT. OKAY, LET'S UH START OFF WITH

[1. HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE MONTH - NOVEMBER 2022]

PROCLAMATIONS. IN OUR FIRST PROCLAMATION THIS EVENING IS FOR HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE.

MONTH NOVEMBER 2022 MR. MOORE TALKING HOLD ON TAKING CARE OF THE MATTER, BUT I'M PULLING OUT MY AGENDA NOW. THIS IS THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING. HERE WE GO, OKAY? RECLAMATION, HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE MONTH NOVEMBER 2022, WHEREAS MEDICARE IS FIRST PROVEN COORDINATED CARE MODEL HOSPICE IS A PROGRAM THAT WORKS OFFERING PERSON CENTERED, COMPASSIONATE CARE, ENSURING PEOPLE DIGNITY, CHOICE AND QUALITY OF LIFE. AND WHEREAS THE HOSPICE MODEL INVOLVES AN INTERDISCIPLINARY, TEAM ORIENTED APPROACH TO TREATMENT, INCLUDING EXPERT MEDICAL CARE, QUALITY, SYMPTOM CONTROL AND COMPREHENSIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT AS A FOUNDATION OF CARE. BEYOND PROVIDING PHYSICAL TREATMENT HOSPICE ATTENDS TO THE PATIENT'S EMOTIONAL, SPIRITUAL AND FAMILY NEEDS AND PROVIDES FAMILY SERVICES LIKE RESPITE CARE AND GRIEF COUNSELING, AND WE'RE AS HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ORGANIZATIONS ARE ADVOCATES AND EDUCATORS ABOUT ADVANCE CARE PLANNING THAT HELP INDIVIDUALS MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THE CARE THEY WANT. TREASURE COAST TASKS HAS CARED FOR OUR COMMUNITIES SINCE 1982 DELIVERING COMPASSIONATE, CARING, EXPERT AND PROFESSIONAL HOSPITAL, HOSPICE AND GRIEF, SUPPORT SERVICES TO PATIENTS AND FAMILIES AT THE END OF LIFE. AND WHEREAS 40 YEARS AGO, VOLUNTEERS CAME TOGETHER TO ESTABLISH TREASURE COAST HOSPICE BECAUSE THEY WANTED THEIR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS TO HAVE ACCESS TO COMPASSIONATE, QUALITY , ENDING END OF LIFE CARE FROM A LOCALLY BASED HOSPICE PROVIDER CELEBRATING ITS 40TH ANNIVERSARY THIS YEAR, TREASURE GHOST HOSPICE NOW SERVES MORE THAN 4000 PATIENTS ANNUALLY. PROVIDING HOLISTIC PATIENT CENTERED CARE AND COMFORT TO PATIENTS AND FAMILIES IN MARTIN ST LUCIE AND OPEN TO CHOBE COUNTIES NOW THEREFORE, I TRY.

MACDONALD MAYOR OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM NOVEMBER 2022 AS HOSPITALS AND PALLIATIVE CARE MONTH IN THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AND ENCOURAGE OUR RESIDENTS. TO LEARN MORE ABOUT HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE AT THE END OF LIFE AND TRY TO HELP US THEY CAN AND COMMEND THE TREASURE COAST HOSPICE TEAM FOR THEIR SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF OUR COMMUNITY. OKAY I DO NOT HAVE ANYBODY RECEIVING THIS. DO WE HAVE SOMEBODY HERE? OH, THANK YOU. THIS IS MR CRAIG PARRY.

IF. PLEASE SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE MICROSOFT AND THAT'S IT. NEXT TO YOU. IT'S AN HONOR TO SERVE THIS COMMUNITY. TREASURE COAST HOSPICE APPRECIATES ALL THE SUPPORT FROM THE COMMUNITY. AND WE'RE HERE FOR YOU. ANYTIME THAT YOU NEED US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT, UM. WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT PROCLAMATION, THE 22ND ANNUAL

[2. 22ND ANNUAL BIBLE READING MARATHON - NOVEMBER 11-15, 2022]

BIBLE READING MARATHON NOVEMBER 11 THROUGH 15 2022. MR MARTEL, THERE IS TIME LEFT, THEY'RE STILL OUT THERE. PROCLAMATION 22ND ANNUAL BIBLE READING MARATHON NOVEMBER 11TH THROUGH 15TH 2022. WHEREAS THE BIBLE IS A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF THE AMERICAN HERITAGE AND IS THE BASIS OF OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS , AND IT SERVES AS THE FOUNDATIONS OF OUR LAWS, OUR NATIONAL CHARACTER AND OUR SYSTEM OF VALUES. AND WHEREAS PRESIDENT ULYSSES S. GRANT STATED, HOLD FAST TO THE BIBLE AS THE SHEET ANCHOR OF YOUR LIBERTIES AND PRESIDENT ABRAHAM

[00:05:03]

LINCOLN CALLED THE BIBLE THE BEST GIFT GOD HAS GIVEN MAN AND HISTORIANS CREDIT PRESIDENT GEORGE WASHINGTON WITH IDENTIFYING THE UNITED STATES AS ONE NATION UNDER GOD. AND WE'RE OUT THE YEAR 1990 WAS PROCLAIMED A JOINT CONGRESSIONAL RESOLUTION. AND PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION AS THE INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF BIBLE READING AND BIBLE READING WEEK HAS BEEN CELEBRATED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. AND WHEREAS THE BIBLE IS THE FOUNDATION FOR MANY BLESSINGS THAT WE ENJOY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOW, THEREFORE, I TRY. MACDONALD MAYOR OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 11TH THROUGH 15TH 2022 AS BIBLE READING WEEK IN THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AND IN HONOR OF THIS WEEK AND THE 22ND ANNUAL BIBLE READING MARATHON. CELEBRATES THE FREEDOM OF OUR NATION AT THE BANDSHELL IN MEMORIAL PARK WITH 90 HOUR CONTINUOUS READ THROUGH OF THE ENTIRE BIBLE, LIFTING UP THE WORD OF GOD, THE WORD THAT CREATED OUR NATION AND CONTINUES TO STRENGTHEN OUR NATION. THANK YOU AND ACCEPT IT WILL BE PASTOR EDDIE AND JOANNE RODRIGUEZ OF THE STEP INTO GRACE AND NEW LIFE MINISTRIES. FIGURED THEY'D BE OUT READING. THEY'RE BUSY READING COMING TODAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. TAKE CARE.

RIGHT? HER BEER. YEAH, I CAME IN FROM JACKSONVILLE. MY NAME IS DONNA HILTON. MY HUSBAND AND I STARTED THIS BIBLE MARATHON BY AH. AFTER THE TOWERS CAME DOWN IN 2001 FOR PROTECTION FOR OUR NATION, AND WE'VE BEEN DOING IT. WE THOUGHT IT WAS ONE YEAR, BUT WE IT'S BEEN GOING ON. THANK GOD FOR ALL THESE 22 YEARS, SO THERE'S PEOPLE DOWN THERE READING NOW, AND WE HAVE A LOT OF OPEN SPACES FOR TONIGHT AND WE SHOULD FINISH SOMETIME TOMORROW. UM MY HUSBAND PASSED AWAY. THE LAST TIME I WAS HERE WAS IN 18. AND HE PASSED AWAY IN 19 ON THE 15TH OF LAST YEAR, THE BIO MARATHON IN 2019. SO I MOVED TO JACKSONVILLE AND I JUST THANK THE LORD FOR EDDIE AND UM AND JOANNE, AND THIS WAS TURNED OVER TO THEM. SO THEY HAVE THE MANDATE TO CARRY THIS ON. AND SO I'M JUST BLESSED TO BE HERE TO BE IN MARTIN COUNTY AGAIN. I LOVE MARTIN COUNTY HERE FOR 30 YEARS AND I HAVE I'M DOWN IN JACKSONVILLE WITH MY DAUGHTER AND HER FAMILY. BUT I'M SO HAPPY TO BE HERE AND TO BE ON THE STREETS IN MARTIN COUNTY, AND I REMEMBER THE WORD THE LORD GAVE ME AND I DON'T HAVE MY PHONE. JUST THAT ONE SCRIPTURE. THE LORD GAVE ME THIS ABOUT MANY YEARS AGO TO THE COMMISSIONERS AND, UM AT THE COUNTY AND I BELIEVE IT'S STILL STANDS TRUE TODAY. AND IT'S FROM PSALM 27. IT'S JUST TWO VERSES, IT SAYS. I HAVE FAINTED UNLESS I BELIEVE TO SEE THE GOODNESS OF THE LORD IN THE LAND OF THE LIVING, AND THAT WAS STILL WORTH. THE LORD GAVE ME THAT FOR MARTIN COUNTY AND FOR THIS TREASURE COAST THAT THIS IS THE LAND OF THE LIVING, BECAUSE, UM, WE ALL WANT TRUTH AND WE WANT THE HEART OF THE PEOPLE AND THE HEART OF THIS CITY AND THIS TREASURE COAST AND MARTIN COUNTY, SO I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU. I THANK EDDIE AND JOANNE FOR RODRIGUEZ AND FOR TAKING THE MANDATE TO CARRY THIS ON. AND I'M JUST BLESSED TO BE HERE. I'M SORRY NOT TO SAVE ULA. SHE'S BEEN DOWN MR REID MANY YEARS AND ALSO CHRISTOPHER COLLINS. SO I'M BLESSED TO SEE THESE PEOPLE AND I DON'T KNOW ALL OF YOU, BUT I JUST THANK THE LORD FOR, UM FOR WHAT YOU'RE DOING IN THIS COUNTY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I HAVE SOME CARDS IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ONE CORK WOULD BE GREAT. COMMISSIONERS I'M DR JULIE BJORNSSON AND I WAS PART OF GETTING THE BIBLE MARATHON STARTED. SO GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU FOR THE 22ND PROCLAMATION FOR BIBLE READING WEEK IN MARTIN COUNTY ARE FIVE DAY BIBLE READING MARATHON STARTS EACH YEAR ON VETERANS DAY AT SIX PM TO FLORIDA'S UNPREDICTABLE WEATHER , STEWART'S ANNUAL VETERANS DAY PARADE AND MEMORIAL PARKS. THEIR CEREMONY WAS CANCELED. WE MISSED THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUBLIC ACKNOWLEDGE OUR VETERANS AND THANK THEM FOR THE FREEDOM WE ENJOY AT THEIR EXPENSE. AMERICA WITHOUT HER BRAVE SOLDIERS WOULD BE LIKE GOD WITHOUT HIS ANGELS. I WOULD LIKE TO PERSONALLY THANK ALL THE VETERANS WHO SERVED AND WE'RE WERE ABLE TO COME HOME. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO THANK ALL THE GOLD STAR FAMILIES FOR THEIR SACRIFICE WHO HAD SERVING MEMBERS THAT DID NOT COME HOME. MY MOTHER WAS A GOLD STAR WIFE ON NOVEMBER 11TH. THE SPECIAL DEDICATION CEREMONY WAS HELD IN WASHINGTON D. C FOR THE NEW NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS MEMORIAL, LOCATED OUTSIDE THE SMITHSONIAN NATIONAL

[00:10:01]

MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN. THIS MEMORIAL REPRESENTS THE NATIVE AMERICANS WHO SERVED IN ALL BRANCHES OF THE ARMED FORCES . IT IS THE IT IS THE WONG DESERVED TRIBUTE TO OUR NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS. THOUGH ENDURING A PROBLEMATIC HISTORY, NATIVE AMERICANS PROMISED TO UPHOLD A GOVERNMENT THAT HAS HISTORICALLY DECIMATED THEIR COMMUNITIES. THEY HAVE SERVED VALIANTLY IN EVERY MAJOR CONFLICT EVERY CAPACITY. EVERY GENERATION SINCE FORMALIZED MILITARY WAS RAISED IN 17 75. AS A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE MUSEUM . I ONLY MISSED THIS DEDICATION CEREMONY DUE TO MY COMMITMENT TO THE BIBLE READING MARATHON. FREEDOM IS WHAT OUR VETERANS FIGHT FOR FREEDOM IS WHAT WE ARE FIGHTING FOR. TODAY THE PANDEMIC WAS A HORRIBLE REMINDER THAT OUR FREEDOMS COULD BE LOST EVERYTHING WE BELIEVE AND HOLD TRUE ABOUT OUR COUNTRY. OUR MORAL, RELIGIOUS AND CONSTITUTIONAL HERITAGE WAS CHALLENGED, INCLUDING OUR FREEDOM TO WORSHIP JESUS CHRIST OUR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION. OF OUR GOD LIVING GIVEN FREEDOMS IS UNDER ATTACK. ALSO UNDER ATTACK IS THE COPYRIGHTED PUBLIC DOMAIN. ENGLISH BIBLE. IT IS THE LONGSTANDING AUTHORITY FROM GOD AND THEY'RE STILL IN THE STABILITY OF OUR NATION. THE INFLUX OF MODERN MADE BIBLE VERSIONS HAS CAUSED MANY DECEPTIVE CHANGES. IN FOUNDATIONAL TRUTH, IT IS THE REAL FREEDOM WE NEED TO FIGHT FOR TO KNOW AND PROTECT. GOD'S TRUTH. MANY PRESIDENTS UNDERSTOOD THAT WITHOUT THE MORAL MORALS AND ETHICS TAUGHT IN THE BIBLE. OUR NATION'S SELF GOVERNMENT WOULD FAIL. TODAY BIBLE TRUTHS ARE BEING REPLACED BY TECHNOLOGY, THE INTERNET, SOCIAL MEDIA AND NOW UNFETTERED , MISLEADING PROPAGANDA INFLUENCING PUBLIC OPINION. BIBLE PROPHECY TELLS US THAT THE COMING ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT ONE WORLD RELIGION WITH HIS FALSE SATANIC BIBLE AND THE RISE OF THE ANTICHRIST, REPLACING JESUS CHRIST AND A TIME OF TRIBULATION DURING THESE UNSETTLED TIMES, AS DARKNESS DESCENDS AROUND ABOUT US, MAY OUR NATION CONTINUE TO HOLD FAST THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE THAT WE ARE ONE NATION UNDER GOD , AND ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL WITH EQUAL JUSTICE. UNDER THE LAW, THE DESTINY OF OUR NATION WAS ESTABLISHED BY GOD TO BE THE LIKE FOR THE GOSPEL TO ALL NATIONS OF THE WORLD. THE GOSPEL IS GOD'S PROMISE OF ETERNAL LIFE THROUGH JESUS CHRIST, WHERE THE SPIRIT OF THE LORD IS. THERE IS LIBERTY. THE QUESTION IS, WILL OUR COUNTRY CONTINUE TO EXIST WITHOUT THE TRUTH FOUND IN THE BIBLE WITHOUT THE CHRISTIAN FAITH? WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY OF THE BIBLE WITHOUT GOD. WE DON'T THINK SO. WHAT IF THERE IS NO TRUE WORD OF GOD LEFT TO READ? GEORGE ORWELL SAID THE FURTHER SOCIETY DRIFTS FROM TRUTH, THE MORE IT WILL HATE THOSE WHO SPEAK IT. THANK YOU. ACTUALLY

[3. WORLD PREMATURITY DAY - NOVEMBER 17, 2022]

MOVING ON TO THE THIRD PROCLAMATION. WORLD PREMATURITY DAY, MIKE. PROCLAMATION WORLD PREMATURITY DAY NOVEMBER 17TH 2022 WHEREAS FAMILIES FACE SERIOUS HEALTH RISKS AND MARCH OF DIMES FIGHTS FOR THEIR HEALTH BY SUPPORTING RESEARCH, LEADING PROGRAMS AND PROVIDING EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY. AND WHEREAS MARCH OF DIMES HAS DEVELOPED A COLLABORATIVE MODEL TO STUDY AND PREVENT PRETERM BIRTH THROUGH GROUNDBREAKING RESEARCH AT FIVE PREMATURITY RESEARCH CENTERS, AND WE'RE AS MARCH OF DIMES IS COMMITTED TO MOBILIZING THE NATION BY AMPLIFYING THE VOICES OF PREGNANT PEOPLE AND FAMILIES. AND WHEREAS 127 BABIES ARE BORN PRETERM EACH YEAR IN MARTIN COUNTY, REPRESENTING 10.2% OF ALL BIRTHS IN THE COUNTY AND WHEREAS MARCH OF DIMES LOOKS FORWARD TO PARTNERING WITH THE CITY OF STEWART IN RESPONSE TO THE CONTINUED MATERNAL AND INFANT HEALTH CRISIS OF PREMATURITY. AND WHEREAS THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER IS RECOGNIZED AS PREMATURITY AWARENESS MONTH IN NOVEMBER, 17 IS RECOGNIZED AS WORLD PREMATURITY DAY TO RAISE AWARENESS NOW, THEREFORE, I TRY. MACDONALD MAYOR OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM NOVEMBER 17TH AS WORLD PREMATURITY DAY. IN THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA. THANK YOU, AND

[4. SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY - NOVEMBER 26, 2022]

IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. NOBODY'S HERE TO ACCEPT THIS. SO THE COURT KOBE'S MAILING THAT MOVING ON TO OUR NEXT PROCLAMATION. SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY NOVEMBER 26TH 2022, MR MARTEL PROCLAMATION SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY NOVEMBER 26TH 2022, WHEREAS THE CITY OF STEWART CELEBRATES OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES AND THE CONTRIBUTIONS THEY MAKE TO OUR LOCAL ECONOMY AND COMMUNITY. AND WHEREAS, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION THERE ARE 32.5 MILLION SMALL BUSINESSES IN THE UNITED STATES. SMALL BUSINESSES REPRESENT 99.7% OF FIRMS WITH PAID EMPLOYEES. SMALL BUSINESSES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 62% OF NET NEW JOBS CREATED SINCE 1995. AND SMALL BUSINESSES EMPLOY 46.8% OF THE EMPLOYEES IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE UNITED STATES. AND WHEREAS 79% OF CONSUMERS UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPPORTING THE

[00:15:03]

SMALL BUSINESSES IN THEIR COMMUNITY ON SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY 70% REPORT. THE DAY MAKES THEM WANT TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO SHOP SMALL. INDEPENDENTLY ON RETAILERS AND 66% REPORT. THAT THE DAY MAKES THEM WANT TO SHOP SMALL ALL YEAR LONG. AND WHEREAS 58% OF SHOPPERS REPORTED THAT THEY SHOPPED ONLINE WITH A SMALL BUSINESS, AND 54% REPORTED, THEY DINED OR ORDER TAKE OUT FROM A SMALL RESTAURANT BAR OR CAFE ON SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY IN 2021.

AND WHEREAS THE CITY OF STEWART SUPPORTS OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES THAT CREATE JOBS, BOOST OUR LOCAL ECONOMY AND PRESERVE OUR COMMUNITIES. AND WHEREAS ADVOCACY GROUPS AS WELL AS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS ACROSS THE COUNTRY HAVE ENDORSED THE SATURDAY AFTER THANKSGIVING AS SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY NOW. THEREFORE I TRIED. MACDONALD MAYOR OF THE CITY OF STEWART, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM NOVEMBER 26 2022 AS SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY AND URGED THE RESIDENTS OF OUR COMMUNITY AND COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY TO SUPPORT SMALL BUSINESSES AND MERCHANTS ON SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY AND THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. OKAY THANK YOU, MR MARTEL. THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WE'LL BE MAILING THIS ONE AS WELL. OKAY, MOVING ON TO OUR FIFTH AND FINAL

[5. WORLD AIDS DAY- DECEMBER 1,2022]

PROCLAMATION WORLDS A DAY DECEMBER 1ST 2022, MR MARTEL PROCLAMATION. WORLD AIDS DAY DECEMBER 1 2022, WHEREAS AN ESTIMATED 38.4 MILLION PEOPLE ARE LIVING WITH HIV. AN ESTIMATED 1.5 MILLION NEW INFECTIONS OCCURRED IN 2021, WHICH IS AN ESTIMATED 4100 NEW INFECTIONS EVERY DAY AND WORLDWIDE 15% OF PERSONS WITH HIV, OR P W H. I DON'T KNOW THEIR STATUS AND ONLY 75% OF WH WHO NEED LIFE SAVING AND TERROR , TRIBUTARY, ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY, OR HRT ARE CURRENTLY ACCESSING THOSE MEDICATIONS. AND WHEREAS THE GLOBAL SPREAD OF HIV NECESSITATES A WORLDWIDE EFFORT TO INCREASE COMMUNICATION, EDUCATION AND ACTION TO STOP THE SPREAD OF HIV THE JOINT NATIONS PROGRAM ON HIV AND AIDS OBSERVES DECEMBER ONE AS WORLD AIDS DAY AND LEADS AND INSPIRES THE WORLD TO ACHIEVE ITS SHARE SHARED VISION OF ZERO NEW HIV INFECTIONS, ZERO DISCRIMINATION AND ZERO AIDS RELATED DEATHS. AND WHEREAS THE 95 95 95 AMBITIOUS GLOBAL PLAN TO HELP END THE AIDS EPIDEMIC, HAS SAID ITS TARGETS FOR 2030 THAT 95% OF ALL P W H WILL KNOW THEIR HIV STATUS. 95% DIAGNOSED WITH HIV WILL RECEIVE SUSTAINED R T AND 95% RECEIVING. AIR T WILL HAVE VIRAL SUPPRESSION. CLINICAL EVIDENCE IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED THAT WH WHO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN AN UNDETECTABLE VIRAL LOAD BY TAKING AIR T DAILY AS PRESCRIBED , CANNOT SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED THE VIRUS TO OTHERS, AND THIS IS KNOWN AS UNDETECTABLE EQUALS TRANSMITTABLE OR U EQUALS YOU AND WHEREAS THE WORLD'S A DAY THEME IN THE UNITED STATES FOR 2022 IS ENDING THE HIV EPIDEMIC EQUITABLE ACCESS EVERYONE'S VOICE. AND WHEREAS IN MARTIN COUNTY MORE THAN 382 PERSONS ARE LIVING WITH HIV AND COMMUNITY PREVENTION NETWORKS AND COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS CAMPBELL, HEALTH SOLUTIONS AND SEASIDE, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER. THROUGH COLLABORATIONS AND PARTNERSHIPS ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO RENEW HIV AND AIDS AWARENESS AND TO EXPAND AND STRENGTHEN THE LOCAL EFFORT TO STOP THE SPREAD OF HIV AND MARTIN COUNTY ON WORLD AIDS DAY. NOW THEREFORE, I TRY. MACDONALD MAYOR OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM WORLD AIDS DAY ON DECEMBER 1ST 2022 URGE ALL RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF STEWART TO TAKE PART IN ACTIVITIES AND OBSERVANCES.

DESIGNED TO INCREASE AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF HIV AND AIDS AS A GLOBAL CHALLENGE AND URGE RESIDENTS TO JOIN THE GLOBAL EFFORTS TO PREVENT FURTHER SPREAD OF HIV AND AIDS.

THANK YOU, MR MARTEL. THAT ONE WAS A LOT. UH RICARDO THINK SO? RICARDO JACKSON, CEO OF CAMPBELL HEALTH SOLUTIONS IT'S GOING TO BE RECEIVING. IS HE HERE TODAY? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, SIR. COME ON UP. MR JACKSON PROBABLY WROTE IT. YOU SHOULD MAKE HIM READ IT AGAIN. HER PICTURE.

TAKE IT. YEAH. FINALLY FOUND SOMETHING FOR HIM TO DO. VERY MUCH ANYWAY. COUPLE WORDS. AT

[00:20:08]

ALL? YEAH I WANTED TO SPEAK. UM JUST THAT WE WANT EVERYONE TO KNOW THAT HIV IS STILL A PROBLEM ACROSS THE NATION AND THE HIV IS STILL A PROBLEM FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. WE REPLACED, UH, NOT REPLACED. BUT WE'VE SURPASSED NEW YORK CITY AND CALIFORNIA. WITH THE RATES OF NEW INFECTION IN THE NATION, SO WE HAVE TO DO OUR PART. EDUCATE OUR YOUNG PEOPLE ABOUT HIV AND STDS, UM, ENCOURAGE THEM TO PRACTICE. ABSTINENCE AND TO, YOU KNOW, WAIT UNTIL THEY'RE IF EMOTIONALLY PHYSICALLY, MENTALLY AND FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE, RESPONSIBLE TO HANDLE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE AND ALSO JUST GOING OUT AND GETTING TESTED AND KNOWING YOUR STATUS BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE NOT NECESSARILY ACQUIRING IT FROM HAVING SEX. REQUIRING FROM SHARING NEEDLES OR OTHER ACCIDENTS OR SITUATIONS THAT MIGHT PUT THEM AT RISK. SO KNOWING YOUR HIV STATUS AND TAKE SOMEBODY TO GET TESTED, THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HMM MOVING ON TO OUR NEXT ITEM. WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE

[6. SERVICE AWARDS NOVEMBER 2022]

NOVEMBER 2022 SERVICE AWARDS. AND OUR FIRST RECIPIENT 10 YEARS WITH THE CITY, MATTHEW COUGH.

DID I GET IT? COUGH? OKAY? EVERYBODY LEFT. CLOUD. DEPARTMENT HAVE BEEN CAREFUL LEFT ME. I APOLOGIZE. IT WILL BE WORSE. THANK YOU, MR SAFETY WORD. YEAH. THAT WAS QUICK CROSS. NEXT WEEK HAVE SPEAKING BY MICHAEL DEBORAH. PARIS TARASCO, ROSCOE ROSCOE. YEAH, HERE'S. US. JUST THAT IT'S BEEN A QUICK FIVE YEARS. I'VE SEEN A LOT OF CHANGES, AND I'M SURE I'LL SEE MANY MORE AND THANK YOU FOR THE RECOGNITION. THANK YOU. CIRCUS THANK YOU POINTS, SO LET'S GO SEE IF THREE'S A CHARM FOR US MESSING UP THE NAMES. UH MATTHEW IS HAM FIVE YEARS WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND HE'S NOT HERE TO CORRECT ME IF I DID GET HIS NAME WRONG, SO, SO I'LL GIVE THAT TO THE CHIEF AND HE CAN PRESENT IT TO HIM. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, CHIEF. WE'RE VERY BLESSED TO HAVE A THEY HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF WONDERFUL EMPLOYEES HERE AT THE CITY AND SO THANK YOU ALL AND I SEE THE WE HAVE A GOOD AMOUNT OF FIRE DEPARTMENT HERE AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AS WELL. OKAY LET'S

[COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONERS]

MOVE ON TO COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS. UH, COMMISSIONER RICH. OH, MR MAYOR. IN MY COMMENTS. OH, THERE IS COMMISSIONER COLLINS JUST WAIT FOR HIM TO GET SETTLED SO HE CAN HEAR WELL LET THE RECORD NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER COLLEGE HAS ARRIVED. SORRY. HELLO MM HMM.

YOU LIKE THAT ALREADY? UM. DURING THE CAMPAIGN, THE PRIMARY CONCERN OF RESIDENTS EXPRESSED TO ME GOING DOOR TO DOOR. IT WAS TOO MUCH GROWTH IN TOO SHORT A PERIOD OF TIME. AND FOR MANY PEOPLE, THE FINAL STRAW WAS THE COSTCO APPROVAL. IT DID NOT COME BEFORE ME. AS A MEMBER OF THE OPA HAPPENED. IT WAS THE INTERVENING PERIOD WHERE I WAS OFF. SO I AM AS RELUCTANT AS YOU PROBABLY WILL BE TO GRAB HOLD OF THIS ISSUE ONCE AGAIN. HOWEVER IT WAS THE NUMBER ONE ISSUE BROUGHT UP WHILE CANVASSING DURING THE ELECTION. AND VERY RECENTLY, MANY CITY RESIDENTS HAVE APPROACHED ME AND THE COMMISSIONERS THROUGH CORRESPONDENCE. AND ASKED THAT WE TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY WITH TO WITHDRAW OUR APPEAL TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE CABINET. OF THE

[00:25:06]

DECISION OF THE LJ, THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, WHICH RULED IN FAVOR OF THE CONCERNS BROUGHT UP BY A CITY RESIDENT THAT THE CITY VIOLATED ITS OWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO THE FIRST QUESTION WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES IS CAN WE WITHDRAW OUR OBJECTIONS OR APPEAL? WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL IT. PRIOR TO THE DECISION OF THE GOVERNOR AND THE CABINET, THE EARLIEST WHICH WOULD BE APPARENTLY, IS DECEMBER 13TH. WOULD THIS ACTION PUT THE CITY AT RISK OF A LAWSUIT? AS I'VE BEEN TOLD, WE WOULD POSSIBLY COULD BE SUED THE NEXT DAY. I ASSERT THAT THE ANSWER IS VERY CLEARLY NO. AND I ASKED MRS LETTER FROM RICHARD GROSSO? I'VE HEARD ABOUT IT, BUT IT WASN'T SENT TO ME. OKAY IN IT, MR GROSSO. STATES. I CAN TELL YOU THAT WHEN PEOPLE SETTLE A CASE APPEALS GET WITHDRAWN ALL THE TIME, OKAY? SO I MEAN THE LEGAL CONCEPT OF WITHDRAWING AN APPEAL IS NOT FAR FETCHED BY ENEMIES. HE BASICALLY SAYS, BECAUSE MS CARTWRIGHTS APPEAL WAS FILED IN A TIMELY MANNER. COSTCO WAS WELL AWARE THAT THE ORDINANCE DID NOT GO INTO EFFECT. UNTIL THE MATTER IS SETTLED. THE FLORIDA STATUTE, 163.3184. IS THE PROCESS FOR ADDRESSING YOU SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE, ADDRESSING A CALM PLAN AND WHAT IT SAYS IS THAT A COMPLIMENT AMENDMENT DOES NOT TAKE PLACE UNTIL 31 DAYS AFTER IT IS APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION. OR GIVING TIME FOR A 30 DAY APPEAL OR AT SUCH TIME AS THE FINAL ORDER HAS BEEN RENDERED IF AN APPEAL IS FILED.

SO THEY CAN PLAN AMENDMENT DID EFFECTIVELY HAS NOT BEEN IN PLACE YET. THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T HAVE ANY BUILDING PERMITS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, HOWEVER. I DON'T THINK HE MENTIONED IT'S KIND OF ODD THAT HE WAS SPEAKING TO TECHNICALLY MY CLIENTS WITHOUT ME THERE, AND HE IS ACTUALLY THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE OTHER SIDE, WHICH IS LIKE UNHEARD OF, BUT COMPLETELY HARMLESS. LIKE I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW TO RESPOND TO IT. UM, BUT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. WHAT HE DIDN'T MENTION. WHEN HE WAS MISLEADING YOU WAS THAT THE CITY COMMISSION VOTED ON THE APPEAL. AND VOTED TO DO IT. AND THEN IF ANYBODY WANTED TO RECONSIDER THAT VOTE THEY HAD TO RECONSIDER BY THE NEXT MEETING, BUT THAT'S OKAY BECAUSE THEN WHEN THE APPEAL HAPPENED WENT FORWARD IN THE RULING CAME DOWN AND PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 163.3184. IF AN IF THE.

ADMINISTRATION RULES THAT THE COMMISSION IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE. AND BY THE WAY, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU KNOW WHAT'S ON APPEAL OR NOT. BUT WHAT'S ON APPEAL? IS THAT THE CITY COMMISSION? FAILED. TWO. REVIEW RELEVANT AND UM, AFFECTIVE DATA. TO MAKE THE DECISION NOT ZONING, NOT IMPACTING WETLANDS, NOT APARTMENTS, NOT PARKING LOTS, BUT THAT THE CITY COMMISSIONERS THEM. THE PEOPLE SITTING AT THAT BOARD FAILED TO LISTEN AND APPROPRIATELY ANALYZED THE DATA THAT WAS PRESENTED BUT ANYWAY TO THE DECISION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE RIGHT, BUT THAT'S IT NOT ENDED UP WITH BUT ANYWAY. WHEN THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE CAME DOWN AND INCLUDED IT INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE THAT WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE IN THE STUFF THAT WAS ALSO SUBMITTED BY MR GRASSO. UM. I BROUGHT IT BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND THE COMMISSION HAD A CHOICE AND THE LANDOWNER NORMALLY WHAT HAPPENS? 16331848 A IF HE ADMITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION FINDS THAT A PLAN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE. IT SHALL SPECIFY THE REMEDIAL ACTIONS THAT WOULD BRING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR PLAN AMENDMENT INTO COMPLIANCE. AND THEN THE BOARD DOES THAT. SO ON DECEMBER 13TH IF WE GET A RULING THAT SAYS IT'S NOT IN COMPLIANCE, AND THAT THE BOARD FAILED TO DO SOMETHING. THEN IT WILL COME RIGHT BACK TO YOU AS A COMMISSION AND YOU GUYS WILL TAKE THAT ACTION. SO IN MARCH OF 22 WHEN THE ALGAE RULING CAME OUT I PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION THAT THEY HAD AN OPTION. THEY COULD IMMEDIATELY SCHEDULE ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING AND ADDRESS EACH ONE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULINGS AND ACCEPT AND SAY, YEAH, WE WERE WRONG. I TOLD THEM THEY WEREN'T WRONG AND THAT THEY HADN'T MADE ANY MISTAKES AND THAT IN FACT THEY HAD GONE OVERBOARD BY HAVING 14 HOURS WORTH OF HEARINGS. OR WE COULD.

FILED THE EXCEPTIONS AND LET THE APPEAL PERIOD NOW, AS YOU MIGHT IMAGINE THE OWNER OF THE LAND

[00:30:04]

WANTED US TO HAVE THE CORRECTIVE HEARING THE IMMEDIATELY THE FOLLOWING MONDAY. OUR COMPLAINT SAYS AS SOON THEREAFTER, AS IS POSSIBLE. AND OUR COMMISSION SAID NO. WE'RE GOING TO WAIT AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO NOT HAVE ANY LAND USE ON YOUR LAND UNTIL THIS APPEAL IS OVER. SO HE PAID $135,000 TAXES THAT I MENTIONED AT THE TIME AT THE LAST MEETING. AND WAITED. AND NOW WE WENT TO.

WE HAD A HEARING IN AUGUST AND THE COMMISSION PRIOR TO THAT HEARING IN AUGUST, DIDN'T TELL ME TO NOT GO. AND THEN IN SEPTEMBER ON SEPTEMBER 12TH. I HAD ANOTHER PRESENTATION FOR THE COMMISSION AND NO ONE SAID TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. AND OF COURSE, THE LANDOWNER HAS JUST WANTED US TO HAVE THE CORRECTIVE HEARING AND GIVE HIM A LAND USE SO HE COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH HIS LAND. BUT WE'VE SAID NO, YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THIS APPEAL IS OVER. NOW. I DON'T THINK MR GRASSO. I DIDN'T READ THE MEMO. SO I DON'T KNOW IF HE MENTIONED ALL THESE THINGS, BUT PEOPLE CALL THAT DETRIMENTAL RELIANCE. AND IF A LANDOWNER DETRIMENTALLY RELIES ON THE REPRESENTATION OF A CITY AND WE FAILED TO GIVE THEM A LAND USE WITH 180 DAYS PURSUANT TO THE STATE LAW. AND THEN THREE WEEKS BEFORE WE GOT THE RULING, WE WITHDREW THE APPEAL. I DON'T THINK THEY'D WAIT TILL TOMORROW TO SUE US. I THINK IT ACTUALLY BE TODAY. BUT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. LET'S ASSUME FOR THE SAKE OF CONVERSATION THAT WE DID WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. WHEN DO YOU GUYS WANT TO SET THE HEARING AND START OVER? BECAUSE THAT'S IT'S NOT ABOUT THE LAND. IT'S A ACCUSATION IS THAT THE CITY COMMISSION? THAT IT WASN'T EVEN FAIRLY DEBATABLE THAT THE CITY COMMISSION REVIEWED RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE DATA AND ANALYSIS.

SO WHAT IF WE WITHDREW THE APPEAL? THE RESPONSIBILITY WOULD BE FOR THIS CITY COMMISSION TO START OVER AND DO IT AGAIN. HOWEVER, HE PROBABLY DIDN'T MENTION THAT IN ORDER FOR MISS CARTWRIGHT TO FILE THE APPEAL. THAT THE ORDINANCE THAT WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY AT TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS VOTED ON UNANIMOUSLY TWICE WAS RECORDED. LAST AUGUST, AND SHE HAD TO FILE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE RENDERING OF THAT, BUT IF SHE WANTED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES THAT SHE CONTINUES TO RAISE RELATED TO THE IMPACTS TO THE WETLANDS. SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE THAT AND FILED A WRIT OF SIRTE IN A RID OF SEARCHING VERY IN CIRCUIT COURT. BUT WHAT THEY DID INSTEAD IS FILED A ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL AND ARGUED TO THE JUDGE THAT IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL THAT SOMEHOW BECAUSE THE TWO WERE TOGETHER, THEY HAD JURISDICTION TO ALSO ARGUE. THESE MITIGATION OF WETLANDS ISSUES. HOWEVER, THE JUDGE RULED THAT. WHAT PAGE 1 72 LINE 23 OF THE TRANSCRIPT. I'M GOING TO STICK WITH MY RULING FROM EARLIER WHEN WE FIRST HAD THE DISCUSSION AND WHEN MR MARTEL FIRST OBJECTED TO ANY REFERENCES TO THE COSTCO SITE PLAN C P U D AND WHAT WAS PROPOSED BUT WHAT I WHAT? AS I DESCRIBED BEFORE I WALK A VERY FINE LINE HERE. I'M GOING TO STAY WITH MY PRIOR RULING. I DO BELIEVE THAT THESE ARE SEPARATE ISSUES AND THAT THIS IS A PROCEEDING ABOUT THE AMENDMENTS . MAP AMENDMENTS, NOT ABOUT ZONING AND NOT ABOUT THE SITE PLAN. SHE ALSO RULED THAT LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING ARE SEPARATE ISSUES. WHICH ARE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. SHE REFERRED US TO THE PAIN CASE. THE PAIN CASE RULING SAID. LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING ARE SEPARATE ISSUES, WHICH GENERALLY MUST BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY, EVEN WHERE AMENDMENTS TO BOTH ARE PRESENTED TOGETHER. IN ADDITION TO THAT, SHE RULED.

ANOTHER TIME AT PAGE 95. BECAUSE I HAD TO CONTINUE OBJECTING THROUGHOUT. IT JUST COULD THEY JUST WOULD NOT LISTEN TO THE JUDGE'S RULINGS. I HAVE TO AGREE WITH MR MARTEL. AND I'VE DONE A FEW OF THESE. NOW WE'RE CHANGING ZONING AND THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN OR A MASTER SITE PLAN WAS PART OF THE SAME ORDINANCE. SO FIRST, SHE SAID. I'VE DONE A FEW OF THESE WHERE IT'S PART OF THE SAME ORDINANCE, AND I CONTINUE TO HEAR HOW WHAT WE DID BY HAVING HIM AS THE SAME ORDINANCE WAS ILLEGAL, BUT SHE'S DONE A FEW WHERE IT WAS THE SAME ORDINANCE AND SHE RULED. UM THAT IS THE SAME ORDINANCE AS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CHANGE, AND I'M NOT AUTHORIZED TO OPINE OR TO MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT ON WHETHER A CHANGE IN ZONING OR WHETHER THE SITE PLAN MAP THAT WAS APPROVED IS AUTHORIZED OR APPROVED OR CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THAT IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT PROCEEDING. THAT IS, MR MARTEL POINTED OUT. CAN BE BROUGHT IN CIRCUIT COURT.

NOW. I DON'T KNOW WHY THEY DIDN'T FILE A MATTER AND CIRCUIT COURT AND CHALLENGE COSTCO AND I KIND OF WISH THEY HAD BECAUSE IT WOULD HAVE LEFT US OUT OF IT. BUT INSTEAD OF CHALLENGING THE IMPACT TO THE WETLANDS, AND INSTEAD OF CHALLENGING THE DENSITY OF THE APARTMENTS AND INSTEAD OF CHALLENGING THE SIZE OF COSTCO THEY SAID THAT THE CITY FAILED. TO COMPLY WITH

[00:35:05]

FLORIDA STATUTE. 163318 HOUR, PARAGRAPH FIVE C ONE THAT SAYS. THAT PLAN AMENDMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE IF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE IS FAIRLY DEBATABLE. FAIRLY DEBATABLE MEANS THAT IF THE CITY COMMISSIONED IF IT COULD BE FAIRLY DEBATED THAT THE CITY COMMISSIONERS TOOK. DATA AND ANALYSIS INTO CONSIDERATION. BUT THEY REALLY DEBATABLE SORT OF MEANS THE TIGERS TO THE RUNNER. IT'S SAYING NOT EVEN JUST THE TIGERS, THE RUNNER, PRESENTERS ANY REASONABLE. EVIDENCE TO BELIEVE THAT THE MUNICIPALITY ACTING IN GOOD FAITH WE'RE GONNA GO WITH THE MUNICIPALITY. SO IT'S BASICALLY SAYING IT'S A VERY LOW STANDARD. OF PROOF HERE, RIGHT? FAIRLY DEBATABLE. AND SHE SAYS THE CITY FAILED TO MEET THAT. WHICH ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS WAIT THREE WEEKS AND THEY'RE GOING TO RULE. BUT SEE WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IS IT'S GOING TO COME OUT. THAT INSTEAD OF JUST ADDRESSING WHETHER OR NOT THE COMMISSION REVIEWED DATA AND ANALYSIS PRESENTED DURING THE HEARING. THAT THE APPELLANT HAS CONSTANTLY TRIED TO MAKE THIS BE ABOUT THE IMPACT ON WETLANDS AND LET ME GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE. OUR COMP PLAN SAYS THAT YOU DON'T ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF MITIGATION OF WETLANDS UNTIL THE DEVELOPMENT PHASE, WHICH IS THE ZONING SIDE OF IT. FOR SAKE OF CONVERSATION. IF YOU WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND AGREE THAT MISS CARTWRIGHT IS CORRECT, THEN YOU CANNOT GIVE IT AG YOU CANNOT GIVE IT SINGLE FAMILY DENSITY. BECAUSE I CAN I CAN I JUST INTERRUPT YOU THERE BECAUSE WITH THIS IS A VERY LONG AGENDA. THIS DISCUSSION IS ACTUALLY MAKING THE POINT THAT I'M GONNA MAKING JUST A FEW MOMENTS, OKAY? SO. I MEAN, CLEARLY IF WE CAN BE SUED TOMORROW THAT NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITIZENS OF STEWART. I AM UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THAT IS NOT THE CASE. BUT WE SHOULD TALK ABOUT THE WAY AND YOU'RE MAKING THE FAIRLY DEBATABLE SO YOU REALIZE HOW THIS LOOKS TO PEOPLE IS WORTH CARRYING THE WATER FOR COSTCO, UNFORTUNATELY, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT INVOLVED IT. ABSOLUTELY NOT. MR MARTEL. I'M JUST TELLING YOU WHAT PEOPLE TO SAY TO ME. OKAY THIS IS HOW IT LOOKS AND YOU KNOW WHAT IF MRS CARTWRIGHT DECIDES TO APPEAL? ARE WE GOING TO SPEND 1 TO 2 YEARS ON OUR OWN? BECAUSE COSTCO CAN'T JOIN THE SUIT AT THIS POINT IN TIME? YOU KNOW, DON'T KNOW THAT SPENDING THE MONEY. JUST LET ME FINISH THE RESOURCES TO FIGHT THIS. YOU KNOW? THIS IS THIS IS OUR JOB, ALL RIGHT, AND I'M JUST READING FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE VIEW OUR JOBS. SO THIS IS GOLD STATEMENT. THIS IS THE VERY FIRST SENTENCE IN THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN, MAINTAINING AN ENHANCED STEWART'S QUALITY OF LIFE, NATURAL BEAUTY AND SMALL TOWN WATERFRONT CHARACTER. IT'S STABLE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND ITS STATUS AS A COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL HUB FOR GREATER MARTIN COUNTY. ONE A ONE. THE NEXT IS SUITABLE TOPOGRAPHIC AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS SHALL BE A BASIS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FUTURE LAND USES. THE LOCATION OF DISTRIBUTION OF TOPOGRAPHIC AND SOIL CONDITIONS, AS WELL AS OTHER LAND USED FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THIS PLAN SHALL BE USED TO ESTABLISH APPROPRIATE LAND USES. SO WHAT THE JUDGE SAYS. AND I'M GOING BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN A LOT OF WHAT THE JUDGE SAYS. IN THE DECISION PAGE 14 49. IT SAYS THE CITY DID NOT PRESENT ANY NON HEARSAY EVIDENCE OR EXPERT TESTIMONY REGARDING THE CHARACTER OF THE UNDEVELOPED LAND. NOT MINIMAL. NOT INADEQUATE. ANY. THE JUDGE GOES ON TO SAY. ON PAGE 15. APPLICANTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPARENT APPLICANTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. PARAPHRASING WAS NOT PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE. AND THIS IS A PHRASE THAT APPEARS OFTEN WAS NOT PROFESSIONALLY ACCEPTABLE. AND THEN GOES, IN ADDITION GOES ON TO SAY. CITY STAFF FAILED TO CONDUCT ANY WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF THE CHARACTER OF THE LAND RELATIVE, THE STATUTORY FACTORS THAT GOVERN FLUME AMENDMENT. SO. A NATURAL INFANTS TO DRAW FROM THIS IS THAT WE DID NOT PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE WRITTEN OR HEARSAY AS TO THE QUALITY OF LAND. IS WE WERE RELUCTANT TO HAVE OUR DATA

[00:40:08]

DATA HELD UP TO SCRUTINY. NOW NORMALLY, I WOULD'VE GONE AND ASKED STAFF ABOUT THIS. BUT NONE OF THE STAFF THAT WERE INVOLVED ARE HERE ANYMORE. THE JUDGE GOES ON TO SAY. PAGE 15. THE ONLY DIRECT EVIDENCE ABOUT CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY AND ITS HABITAT VALUE WAS THAT PETITIONERS EXPERT ECOLOGIST MR BRAUN. WHICH THE UNDERSIGNED FOUND TO BE CREDIBLE AND PERSUASIVE. THE ONLY EVIDENCE I DON'T KNOW WHERE MR FREEMAN WAS. SHOULDN'T HE WASN'T AH, SHE ALSO GOES ON TO SAY OR PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN, TOM READS. SHE ALSO GOES ON TO SAY. THE HIGH QUALITY OF THE HABITAT IS EVIDENCED BY THE PRESENCE OF A VARIETY OF HIGH TROP TROPHIC LEVEL SPECIES, INCLUDING FORAGING WAITING BIRDS LIKE THE LITTLE BLUE HERON, TRI COLORED HERON, GREAT EGRET, GREAT BLUE HERON AND BLACK CROWNED NIGHT HEARING. SO. YOU KNOW, THIS IS WHAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO DO. LET ME GET THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN BACK IN FRONT OF ME. SO SECTION ONE, A. THREE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE NATURAL RESOURCES SHALL BE PROTECTED AND CONSERVED. THESE RESOURCES INCLUDE WETLANDS, FLOODPLAINS, PORTABLE, POTABLE GROUNDWATER SHORELINES, ESTUARINE SYSTEMS, RIVERS, BAYS, LAKES, SOILS, NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES, LISTED WILDLIFE SPECIES AND ASSOCIATED HABITAT AND AIR QUARRY. THE CITY SHALL CONSERVE AND PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS, WHICH CONSIDERS THE TYPES VALUES FUNCTIONS, SIZES, CONDITIONS AND LOCATIONS. OF NATURAL RESOURCES. AND THE JUDGE SAYS THE ONLY EVIDENCE SHE HAS WITH REGARD TO THE PRESENCE OR, YOU KNOW ABSENCE OF THESE NATURAL RESOURCES. IT'S FROM MISS CARTWRIGHT AND HER ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL. SO. ANOTHER REASON TO RECONSIDER IS THAT WHEN THIS DECISION WAS ORIGINALLY MADE, WE DID NOT HAVE THE BENEFIT OF THE OPINION OF THESE TWO LAWYERS. ONE IS THE LJ. I BELIEVE HER NAME IS FRANCINE FOLK. AND THE OTHER IS RICHARD GROSSO, ONE OF FLORIDA'S MOST PREEMINENT LAND USED ATTORNEYS. WHO ACCEPTED THIS CASE. AND. ONE LET ME REMIND YOU WHO RICHARD GROSSO IS RICHARD GROSSO. IS THE LAWYER.

WHO TOOK ON THE CASE. AND HAD AND. WE'VE ALL BEEN IN MUNICIPAL PLANNING EVENTS. THIS CASES BROUGHT UP EVERY SINGLE TIME. THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS IN JENSEN BEACH THAT HAD BEEN BUILT WERE TORN DOWN. AND MR GROSSO WON THAT CASE. SO. I THINK WE SHOULD RECOGNIZE HIS EXPERTISE IN THIS AREA. AND. WELL I MEAN, I WOULD HATE TO FIND ITSELF IN ANOTHER SITUATION. SO I'M. DO WE REALLY WANT TO SIT IN FRONT OF OUR CITIZENRY? IN LIGHT OF THIS INFORMATION AND THESE RULINGS AND SAY, WE'RE NOT WILLING TO PROVIDE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS? DON'T WE HAVE THE COURAGE? TO AT LEAST LISTEN. TO THE CONCERNS OF THE MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS IN ATTEMPT TO COME UP WITH A BETTER DECISION. ARE WE GOING TO FOLLOW THE LAW? OR PLAY POLITICS. AND FINALLY, IS THIS THE BEST WE CAN DO? I LOOKED AT A PICTURE TODAY OF THE PROJECT AND ONE HALF OF THE PROPERTY FRONTING CANTOR HIGHWAY IS WHAT WE ALL KNOW IT'S CALLED THE BNP, RIGHT. IT'S A BIG, MUDDY PART. THAT WE LEARNED THREE WEEKS AGO AT THE MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL ONLY FUNCTIONS AT 40% EFFICIENCY AFTER THREE YEARS. IF THAT'S NOT BAD ENOUGH . WE ALSO LEARNED AND I CONFIRMED THIS TODAY THAT THOSE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MODELS ARE BASED ON 1970 RAINFALL DATA. IF YOU'VE BEEN AROUND FLORIDA RECENTLY, I BET YOU AGREED THAT WHAT WE'VE SEEN EVEN IN JUST THE PAST FEW WEEKS. THAT THAT THAT DATA IS REALLY INADEQUATE, AND I BET THE TRAFFIC CONCERN

[00:45:09]

CONCURRENCY WAS BASED ON 2018 DATA. ARE THOSE CALCULATIONS? ARE WE REALLY GOING TO SAY THOSE CALCULATIONS ARE SUFFICIENT TO PROTECT THE RIVER THAT IS SO CLOSE BY HAVE WE INCORPORATED AS MANY L I D AND G S. I ELEMENTS AS POSSIBLE. I BET WE HAVEN'T WE WERE TOLD TWO WEEKS AGO THAT THE FIRE STATION AND MISS BRUNER, YOU KNOW WE'RE SUPPOSED TO LEAD BY EXAMPLE. NONE OF THEM WERE TOLD NONE OF THESE ELEMENTS COULD BE USED IN THE NEW FIREHOUSE. THE NEXT DAY. I FORWARDED THOSE PLANTS, THE MRC AND WAS TOLD THAT YES, THERE WERE MANY ELEMENTS THAT WE COULD INCORPORATE. AND WE WILL BE INCLUDING THOSE IN THE RFP. SO LET'S TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO BRING IT BACK. I'M NOT SAYING COSTCO WON'T END UP THERE. BUT IF WE DO DECIDE TO LET IT GO FORWARD, LET'S MAKE IT A SHOWCASE. OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP. AND A GREAT EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE CITY LOOKS TO ACHIEVE WITH ALL OUR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FUTURE. ALL I'M ASKING IS THAT WE TALK ABOUT IT. THIS IS MY MOTION. I'M GONNA MAKE I JUST WOULD LIKE TO TALK ABOUT IT. IT MAY END UP WITH MR MARTEL. BEING ABLE TO EXPLAIN TO THE CITIZENS WHY THAT IS NOT A PRACTICAL SOLUTION AT THIS TIME AND WORST CASE SCENARIO IS PEOPLE APPRECIATE THE EFFORT WE'VE MADE. AND UNDERSTAND THE DECISION WE MAKE. AND WE HAVE AS COMMISSIONERS. I MEAN, I LOST THIS WEEK I DIDN'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO MR MOTEL, HURRICANE PREPARATIONS AND STAFF IS A ABSENT STAFF. AND SO I WOULD APPRECIATE THE NEXT TWO WEEKS TO GET BETTER INFORMED. SO I'M MAKING A MOTION, MR MAYOR. THAT. WE PUT ON THE AGENDA FOR IT'S THE 28TH IS IT? I'M SORRY.

MARY 28, THE JUST LET ME TRY TO BE PRECISE HERE. AND LEARNING ABOUT THESE MOTIONS. YES WE DISCUSSED FILING A NOTICE TO THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET. THAT THE CITY WITHDRAW ITS EXCEPTIONS TO THE A. L. J RECOMMENDED ORDER. AND MR MARTEL WAS MENTIONING THAT'S CORRECT AND THAT THE CITY SCHEDULES A PUBLIC HEARING. TO CONSIDER NOR IMAGE RESCINDING THE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REPORT RATED RELATED APPROVALS. AND THAT'S MY MOTION. IS A POINT OF CLARIFICATION IN THE EVENT THAT WE WERE TO WITHDRAW THE EXCEPTIONS. 163.3184 THEN SAYS THAT ESSENTIALLY, WE WOULD CONCEDE THAT THE COMMISSION WAS NOT IN COMPLIANCE THAT THE RULING IT SAYS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT MUST TAKE THE REMEDIAL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO BRING THE PLAN FOR AMENDMENT INTO COMPLIANCE. CORRECT, SO IT WOULDN'T BE A DECISION OF THE ORDINANCE. IT WOULD BE WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO BRING THAT PLAN INTO COMPLIANCE AND THE ISSUES THAT. ARE NECESSARY TO BRING THAT IN COMPLIANCE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS WITHOUT HAVING THAT RULING BECAUSE WE HAD THE BENEFIT OF MR. BROWN'S REPORT AT THE SECOND READING IT WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION IN ITS ENTIRETY. I'M AWARE OF THAT. SO IS THERE OTHER DATA OR INFORMATION THAT YOU WOULD NEED PRESENTED THAT THAT WASN'T PRESENTED BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE WHAT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE? UM. YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE ARE MORE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO US, AND WE'VE SPOKEN ABOUT YOUR TALKING AGAIN. NOW YOU'RE MOVING INTO THE ZONING STUFF AS IT RELATES TO THE BIG, MUDDY POND. THAT ZONING THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE. THAT'S THE ZONING ISSUES. THAT'S NOT ON APPEAL. I UNDERSTAND BECAME VESTED AFTER 30 DAYS. WHAT THIS DOES IS ESSENTIALLY BECOMES LIKE A BACKDOOR MEANS OF TRYING TO REOPEN THE ZONING ISSUE THAT NO ONE APPEALED. BUT AGAIN, IT'S THE COMMISSION'S DISCRETION. BUT I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT WHAT IT TRIGGERS IS A REQUIREMENT QUESTIONS. I THINK THESE QUESTIONS PROVED THE VALUE OF MY MOTION. I'M JUST ASKING THAT WE TALK ABOUT IT. IN THE CONTEXT OF RESCINDING THAT. I MEAN, PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN AGREE ON WHETHER IT'S AN APPEAL OR AN OBJECTION. BUT OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? OKAY CAN WE CLARIFY WHAT THE

[00:50:02]

MOTION WAS? IT'S TO HAVE A D AND D AND THEN A SECOND HEARING SEPARATE HEARING OF THE MOTION AS I UNDERSTAND IT, COMMISSIONER RICH CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG IS TO HAVE AN AGENDA ITEM WHERE WE DISCUSS RESCINDING THE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE NDP D. OKAY. THE ZONING TO DISCUSS WITHDRAWING THE EXCEPTIONS, EXCEPTIONS. WHICH WOULD INCLUDE WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THAT WHAT RESPONSIBILITIES WOULD CREATE FOR THE CITY? IT'S A COMPLICATED DISCUSSION AND HOPEFULLY, MR DIAZ COULD CLEAR SOME SPACE ON THE AGENDA. LITIGATION AND NOT BE ASHAMED IT FIRST OF ALL, IT SHOULD BE ASHAMED MEETING IF IT WAS GOING TO BE CONFIDENTIAL NEGOTIATIONS , BUT IF MR GROSS'S MEETING WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S OUTSIDE OF MY PURVIEW ANYWAY, I'VE HAD NO MEETING WITH MS CARTWRIGHT OR MR GRASSO. I SIMPLY READ THE LETTER THAT I RECEIVED ON THE COMMISSIONER'S EMAILS. KIND OF. I MEAN, HE COMMUNICATED DIRECTLY. THERE'S NO DOUBT BUT AGAIN I DON'T I I'M NOT. I'M NEVER GOING TO SHOP AT COSTCO AND I'M NOT GOING TO LIVE IN THE APARTMENT, SO I DON'T REALLY HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN IT. I MEAN, MAX STUCKEY WROTE US A LETTER IN THE LETTERS RIGHT? MORE HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT IF IT'S IF WE WERE SO HORRIBLE AND WE DID SUCH A BAD JOB AND WE FAILED SO MISERABLY. WHY DON'T WE JUST WAIT FOR THREE WEEKS AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS? WHY DON'T WE JUST GET THE RULING? BECAUSE IF WE DID FAIL THAT WE MADE THESE ERRORS, THE LIST WHAT WE NEED TO DO. WE'RE THEN STUCK WITH IT. NO IF WE FAILED AND WE LOSE, BUT IF WE WIN, WE'RE STUCK WITH IT. IF YOU ARE SUCCESSFUL, AND YOU'RE YOU'RE APPEALING WERE VINDICATED. WE'RE STUCK WITH IT. IF WE WIN, WE WERE NOT. WE DIDN'T DO IT WRONG. OUR PROCESS UNDERSTAND THAT. SO I MEAN AGAIN . I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE HAVE EMOTION. WE HAVE NEVER HEARD OF THIS. OKAY? WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. SO, UM, UNTIL WE HAVE TIME FOR DELIBERATION, WE'LL HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC. I WON'T BE SUPPORTING THE MOTION. UH FIRST OF ALL, WE DID IT. WE DID IT. I BELIEVE WE DID IT RIGHT. I BELIEVE THE JUDGE AIRED. SHE USED ALL KINDS OF EVIDENCE THAT WAS PROFFERED THAT SHE HAD PREVIOUSLY RULED INADMISSIBLE. I THINK THAT, UM AND I THINK THAT IS THE THING I THINK, AND WE TOOK 14 ROUGHLY 14 HOURS OF TESTIMONY, INCLUDING MR BRAUN, MR. WE HAD HOURS OF PUBLIC TESTIMONY. UM. AND THAT TESTIMONY BUT PUBLIC COMMENT DIFFERENT THAN TESTIMONY. UM AND I ALSO THINK THAT, UH, YOU KNOW WHERE I AM EVERY DAY. I HAVE PEOPLE CALL ME GOING. CITY RESIDENTS, INCLUDING ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS THAT STOPS AT MY HOUSE ONCE A WEEK, ASKING ME HE ARE WHEN IT'S GOING TO GET STARTED AND SUPPORTING IT. UM AND I'M JUST GONNA JUST I'M GONNA JUST MAKE A COUPLE OF CLARIFICATIONS . WE DO HAVE STAFF THAT'S STILL HERE. UH MR MARTEL AND MR DIAZ, THEY WERE DEEPLY INVOLVED IN IT. BUT ALSO THE FIRST CHANGE, PLEASE. WHY DIDN'T THE CHAMBERS UM. IT SAYS THE FOR YOU TALK ABOUT THE FIRST PARAGRAPH, THE COP PLANT, UM AND I DIDN'T WRITE IT DOWN VERBATIM. SO UH, STABLE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. IS THERE SOMETHING UNSTABLE ABOUT A UH, APARTMENT COMPLEX A AND B, UH, COMMUNITY WHERE THE COMMERCIAL CENTER OF CAN'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT THE WORD WAS, BUT THAT WE'RE BASICALLY WE'RE THE COMMERCIAL CENTER OF THE COUNTY. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT AH, THE NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL DISTRICT. FUTURE LAND USE PROVIDES AND I THINK THAT FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF DRAINAGE AND GETTING INTO THE YOU KNOW THE ISSUE IS NOT ABOUT ZONING, BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT WE DID A REALLY GOOD JOB ON THE ZONING. UH I THINK THAT WE GOT SOME OF THE BEST DRAINAGE BEST SITE PLAN THAT I THINK THE CITY HAS EVER DONE. AND ON TOP OF THAT. I THINK MR MARTEL IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. JUST BRINGING THIS ISSUE FORWARD WILL BRING A LAWSUIT. I MEAN, WITHOUT EVEN WE WILL GET SUED. AND IT WON'T BE SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DEFEND IN HOUSE. I THINK MR MARTEL WILL PROBABLY A WITNESS. SO UH, IN THE LAST LAWSUIT THAT WE HAD SIMILAR TO THIS INVOLVED, WHICH WAS NOTHING COMPARED TO THIS FIRST. WHAT IT'S GOING TO COST WAS THE HARBOR RIDGE INVOLVING, UM, LIVE ABOARDS AND SOME BOATS AND SOME PARKING AND THAT WAS COSTING US 30,000 OR NO 20,000 MONTH LITIGATION FEES. AND I CAN SEE THIS ONE IS GOING TO BE A LOT MORE EXPENSIVE SO I WON'T BE SUPPORTING IT, BUT, UH SO, COMMISSIONER BERNARD, YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR BE USED

[00:55:05]

SUPPORTING ANOTHER RELYING ON OUR ATTORNEY? MR COLLINS. ANY COMMENTS? FIVE YEARS AND HE HASN'T LET US WRONG YET. OKAY, SO, UM SO DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS MOTION? OKAY PLEASE, WITH MR KURT, RIGHT, THEN, IF YOU FILL OKAY. THANK YOU. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IT AGAIN. AND I'M HAVE NOT SPOKEN WITH ANY OF YOU ABOUT THIS SPECIFICALLY, SO THERE WERE NO INSINUATIONS THAT THERE WAS ANY SHADE LAW BEING VIOLATED.

I'M HERE TO ASK YOU TO SUPPORT THE 11 28 AGENDA EDITION OF THE RESOLUTION TO REMOVE YOUR OBJECTION FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION KNOWN AS THE CANCER CPU, D. AS A REMINDER THE ACTUAL APPLICANT AND RELATED PARTIES WAIVED THEIR RIGHTS TO CLAIM ANY INVOLVEMENT IN THIS WHEN THEY ELECTED NOT TO INTERVENE. THEY PRESENTED NO WITNESSES FOR CONSIDERATION, NOR ANY TESTIMONY. THIS CASE IS ENTIRELY AGAINST THE CITY OF STEWART AND NOT THE APPLICANT EMINEM REALTY, NOT ITS OWNERS, JOE MARINO, JACK MORRIS AND NOT COSTCO. FROM MR GROSSO'S MEMO. BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THAT NOT EVERYBODY HAS READ IT. THE CITY APPROVAL NEVER BECAME LEGALLY EFFECTIVE, AND THUS THE APPLICANT HAS NO LEGAL VESTED RIGHTS. OUR RELIANCE CLAIM THAT WOULD PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM RESCINDING THE ORDINANCE THAT APPROVED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING APPROVAL INSIGHT PLAN. THIS EFFORT HAS BEEN PUBLICLY SUPPORTED BY ATTORNEY MAX DUCKY AND ECOLOGIST GREG BRAUN, WHO STATED IN HIS LETTER TO YOU THAT HE BELIEVED THE CITY AND ITS RESIDENTS DESERVE BETTER THAN WHAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED. THIS EFFORT HAS ALSO BEEN SUPPORTED BY VOTE WATER RIVER KIDS AND FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES. WHO SAID IN THEIR LETTER TO YOU, THE LAW JUDGE FOUND MR BROWN'S TESTIMONY WAS CREDIBLE AND ACCURATE AND FOUND THE OPPOSITE ABOUT THE APPLICANTS. CONSULTANT'S REPORT.

NOW IT'S GOING TO GO BACK TO THE GOVERNOR FOR CONSIDERATION AND CHANCES ARE THAT HE'S GOING TO RULE ONE OF THREE WAYS IN THE MAJORITY OF US THINK THAT HE'S GOING TO SEND IT BACK TO THE GTA REWRITE HER RULING, AND THAT OUTCOME WILL BE THE SAME. YOU WILL NEED TO RE HEAR THIS. YOU WILL NEED TO RE HEAR THE LAND USE. YOU WILL NEED TO RE HEAR THE ZONING AND YOU WILL NEED TO RE HEAR THE SITE PLAN. THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE TO REPRESENT THE COMMISSION ALL OF THOSE THINGS AND IT WILL BE UP TO YOU TO MAKE SURE THAT IT IS CONGRUENT WITH THE LEGS RECOMMENDATION. AND YOUR OWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FROM MR GROSSO'S MEMO AGAIN IN SOME THE CITY OF STORE BY OPERATION OF ITS OWN ADOPTION ORDINANCE, STATE LAW AND JUDICIAL PRECEDENT IS COMPLETELY FREE TO RESCIND ALL APPROVALS FOR THE COSTCO PROJECT EFFECTUATING. THIS ACTION WOULD INCLUDE FILING A NOTICE TO THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET THAT THE CITY WITHDRAWS HIS EXCEPTIONS TO THE RECOMMENDED ORDER AND THAT THE CITY HAS SCHEDULED A PUBLIC HEARING. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE WERE SENDING THE PLAN ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE PLAN MENTUM AMENDMENT AND ITS APPROVALS. TAXPAYERS HAVE FOOTED YOUR BILL TO GO TO TALLAHASSEE TO FIGHT THIS LAWSUIT THAT YOU CLEARLY LOST AND WHEN WE GO BACK TO TALLAHASSEE IN 12 13 TAXPAYERS WILL FUND YOUR TRIP YET AGAIN. YOUR FEAR OF BEING SUED BY COSTCO INSTEAD OF YOUR ALLEGIANCE AND DUE TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS IS ABSURD. LINDY CAVE, RICHARD. INDICATE RICHARDD WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE GIVE IT TO THE CLERK. GOOD EVENING. I WAS LISTENING TO THE MEETING. AS I WAS RACING OVER HERE IS IT'S HARD TO GET HERE FOR FOUR O'CLOCK, AND I WAS SURPRISED TO HEAR THAT THIS WAS ALREADY ON DISCUSSION AND COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS. SO MY PREPARED COMMENTS THAT I HAD MADE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ABOUT THE OUT THE WINDOW, BUT I JUST WANT TO SAY EMINEM REALITY OF STEWART, WHO OWNS THIS PROPERTY PURCHASES PROPERTY ON DECEMBER 28TH 2021. THEY HAVE YET TO PAY A DIME IN PROPERTY TAXES TO YOU. PERIOD YOU CAN GO LOOK, THEIR TAX RECORDS ARE RIGHT THERE, AND THEY PURCHASED IT ON THE 20TH OF DECEMBER 2020 NIGHTS, TWO DAYS OF PROPERTY TAXES. THAT IS PUBLIC RECORD. YOU CAN GO LOOK, SO LET'S CRY ME A RIVER RIVER FOR EMINEM REALITY WHO IS A PRIVATE COMPANY OUT OF NEW JERSEY. OKAY THEY BOUGHT THIS LAND FULLY AWARE THAT WE WERE UNDER THIS. I AM THE ORIGINAL INTERVENER AS I'M SURE YOU KNOW THEY WERE FULLY AWARE ON DECEMBER 28TH OF 2021. THAT THIS LAND WAS NOT SETTLED. THERE WAS THE DOHA HEARING. WE HAD ALREADY HAD THE DOUGHY HEARING. YET THEY PURCHASED THE LAND ANYWAYS AND NOW WE ARE SCARED. THE CITY OF STEWART IS SCARED THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SUE YOU. BUT THEY KNEW WE WERE ALREADY IN THIS SITUATION. SO LIKE I SAID, I'M I JUST I'M SITTING HERE AND I'M WONDERING, AND I ALSO WANT TO SAY THAT I'M I'M VERY UPSET AND DISTURBED THAT MR MARTEL DID NOT EVEN READ. RICHARD GROSSO'S MEMO THAT HE SENT TO ALL OF YOU HIS THREE PAGE MEMO. I HEARD YOU, I'D LISTEN. YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T READ THEM TO ME. I NEVER GOT IT TODAY. THE FACT THAT HE HAS NOT SEEN THIS MEMO BY RICHARD GRASSO AND HAS HAS NO IDEA WHERE IT LAYS ON THREE PAGES ON HOW YOU GUYS CAN LEGALLY DO THIS. THAT THE DEVELOPER CAN'T SUE YOU.

[01:00:01]

THEY DIDN'T SHOW UP. THEY COULD HAVE HAD THEIR DUE PROCESS. THEY COULD HAVE BEEN INTERVIEWED, OR THEY COULD HAVE SHOWN UP. AT DOHA. THEY DID NOT. OKAY SO WE SIT HERE AS YOUR PEOPLE. AND WE WANT TO KNOW WHY THIS HAPPENED. WHY THE DEVELOPER BOUGHT THIS LAND FULLY KNOWING THAT THIS WAS THERE. SO AS THE CITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, YOU HAVE THE ABILITY AS WELL AS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS TO ACCEPT THIS. L JUST RUINED YOUR OBJECTIONS AND I WANT TO GIVE HIM GOING FURTHER. YOU NEED TO REPEAL THE ORDINANCE OF 24 66 2021. BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT? THAT IS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. THANK YOU. MR MAYOR. MR. MAYOR. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO CORRECT THE RECORD. I'M LOOKING AT THE I'M LOOKING AT. I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY. OH, NO, IS THAT IT? I AM LOOKING ATX DUCKY, WHICH INCLUDED THE MEMO BY RICHARD GROSSO. IT IS SENT TO THE FIVE OF US AND CARBON COPY TODAY OF DIETS AND MICHEL MARTEL . WHEN WAS IT SENT TO YOU TELL ME I'M GETTING USED TO THIS PROGRAM, OKAY? AND WHILE HE'S LOOKING THAT UP, GIL SMART I CAN FORWARD IT TO YOU, MIKE. I CAN'T SEE A DATE ON IT. I'M SORRY. WEDNESDAY. I'M SORRY, IT SAYS WEDNESDAY. LAST WEDNESDAY. GIL THANK YOU SINCE TUESDAY AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS MY NAME'S GIL SMART, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF VOTE WATER, MARTIN COUNTY BASED CLEAN WATER ADVOCACY GROUP. HERE TO ASK THAT YOU WERE SENT TO CITIES APPROVAL OF THE COSTCO PROJECT THAT WAS FOUND BY A STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE TO VIOLATE STATE LAW. ARE SPECIFIC REQUEST IS ARTICULATED IN THE LETTER WE SENT ALONG WITH FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES AND RIVER KIDS TO EACH CITY COMMISSIONER LAST WEEK ARE CONCERNED OUR CONCERN, BUT WATERS CONCERN IS PRIMARILY WITH THE WETLANDS ON THE SITE, WHICH WERE CHARACTERIZED AS LOW QUALITY WETLANDS BY THE DEVELOPERS CONSULTANT BUT SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTATION BY SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL SUGGESTS THIS MAY NOT BE ACCURATE. WE ARE CONCERNED AS WE BELIEVE YOU SHOULD BE CONCERNED WITH THE POTENTIAL LOSS OF HIGHER QUALITY WETLANDS THAT SUSTAINED WADING BIRDS, PARTICULARLY SPECIES DESIGNATED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AS THREATENED AS YOU LIKELY KNOW. THE CI REPORT ALSO CONFIRMED THE PRESENCE OF SEVERAL ENDANGERED THREATENED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED PLANTS ON THE COSTCO SITE. THE CITY'S COMING PLAN DEMANDS THAT ALL OF THIS BE PROTECTED. SO WE AGREE WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING. THE CITY'S APPROVAL OF THE COSTCO PROJECT WAS IN VIOLATION OF STATE LAW, AND WE BELIEVE THE CITY SHOULD RESCIND THAT APPROVAL AND GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD. AND FOR SOME ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION. WE SUBMITTED RICHARD GROSSO'S LETTER. WE BELIEVE THE CITY HAS THE EXPRESS LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO THIS NOW, MORE THAN EVER, STEWART AND INDEED, ALL OF FLORIDA NEEDS TO BE COGNIZANT OF WHAT IS LOST WHEN WE BULLDOZE CRITICAL WETLANDS FOR YET MORE PAVEMENT AND YET MORE DEVELOPMENT. AS WE SAID IN OUR LETTER, WE BELIEVE THE CITY AND THE STATE STANDS AT A CROSSROADS. LET'S NOT MAKE THE WRONG TERM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU , VERY JOE MHM, BOWERY JONES.

GIVEN TO THE PEOPLE.

COMMISSIONERS MY NAME IS VALERIE JONES. I REMEMBER THE FIRST TIME I ENTERED STEWART DECEMBER OF 1979. I DROVE OVER THE OLD ROOSEVELT BRIDGE AND THOUGHT I WAS SAYING PARADISE NOW, NOT SO MUCH. I SPENT NEARLY 40 YEARS LIVING ON THE ST LUCIE RIVER, WATCHING IT GO FROM SPECTACULAR , TOO. SPOILED TRAFFIC GO FROM AWKWARD TO IMPOSSIBLE 20 YEARS WE'RE OPPOSITE THE 49 ACRES, THE CITY'S RESULT FOR COSTCO. A JUDGE TOSSED OUT AND THE CITY APPEALED. I BEG YOU TO RECONSIDER. MOST COSTCOS ARE A THIRD THE SIZE OF THIS PROJECT WITHIN BLOCKS OF AN INTERSTATE SERVED BY MAJOR ROADS. ALREADY FILLED WITH BIG BOX STORES AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS PROPOSAL IS NONE OF THESE THE MELBOURNE AND WEST PALM COSTCOS ARE WITHIN A FEW BLOCKS OF I 95 A MINUTE TENSE DEVELOPMENT. THE WEST PALM STORE IS SERVED BY A 10 LANE DIVIDED ROAD AND HAS SEVEN VEHICLE ENTRANCES. WHEN I LIVED ON CANADA, IT OFTEN TOOK FIVE MINUTES TO WIN OR TRAFFIC THAT WAS BEFORE THE HOSPITAL WA WA AND THE APARTMENTS ON INDIAN TO GO AROUND THE BLOCK TOOK 20 MINUTES FOR MILES FOR TRAFFIC LIGHTS, SOME TAKING THREE CYCLES . IT'S WORSE NOW. 30,000 CARS A

[01:05:03]

DAY PAST INDIAN AT CANTOR, THREE LANES EACH WAY. NOW THE DLT IS STARTING A $5 MILLION PROJECT FROM CABANA POINT NORTH TO US ONE. AND THERE'S ANOTHER ONE WHICH THE CITY HAS NEVER TOLD THE DAY DEAL T ABOUT DON'T, UH GOING TO 95. COSTCO'S OWN FIGURES SHOW 5000 CUSTOMERS DAILY 10,000 TRIPS, 400 APARTMENTS HAD 1100 TRIPS, 18 GAS PUMPS, FAST FOOD AND MORE RETAIL AT 1500 CHIPS FOR MORE THAN 30 16,000 EXTRA CARS A DAY ON A BLOCK THAT'S A MILE LONG WITH THE SCHOOL ON ONE END AND A HOSPITAL ON THE OTHER. YOUR OWN ORDINANCE, SAYS NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING SHOULD BE WALKABLE WITH BLOCKS OF 500 FT. THIS BLOCK IS 10 TIMES THAT THE PLAN IS A TRAVESTY. AND REMEMBER THE 18 WHEELERS, TANKERS, DELIVERY VANS , 40 PLUS STAYS TRIPS A DAY, AT LEAST IN AND OUT BARRELING ALONG , WILL IT IT WILL BE FROM I 95 TO AWARD CANADA TRAFFIC AND TOUGH TERMS, BUT THAT'S ALRIGHT BECAUSE MANY TRUCKS WILL COME IN OVERNIGHT. RIGHT WRECKING THE PEACE AND QUIET OF MILLION DOLLAR HOMES. NOR THE COMMISSIONER'S WORRIED ABOUT THE 2000 KIDS AT MARTIN COUNTY HIGH OR RIDING MARKS TO THE SPLASH PARK OR THE HUNDREDS OF FOLKS WHO HAVE LIVED IN RIVER LAND OR CABANA POINT FOR DECADES WHO TRUSTED A FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROMISING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE IT'S A WETLAND. THE RIVER IS A FOOT BELOW THE SURFACE. LOOK AT THE PHOTOS. I CAN ATTEST TO THE THOUSANDS OF BIRDS AND ANIMALS THAT LIVE THERE. CROSSING THE ROAD TO THE RIVER 300 AWAY, EVEN THE OCCASIONAL BOBCAT. THANK YOU . YOUR TIME IS UP. YOU ARE THE CAREGIVERS OF THIS QUESTIONS. TOWN VOTERS GAVE YOU THE GIFT OF DAMAGE LOOKS. THANK YOU. YOUR TIME IS UP. OKAY, JIM, MORE. GOOD AFTERNOON EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JIM MOYER. I'M A RESIDENT OF PROBABLY JUST UM I'M ALSO THE INDIAN RIVER KEEPER AND I AM THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE MARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL. I'VE ALSO BEEN AN L. P A MEMBER MARTIN COUNTY FOR 20 YEARS. THIS IS VERY CLOSE TO THE RIVER. YOU'VE BEEN ADMONISHED THAT YOU DID NOT FULLY CONSIDER THE DATA. I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT YOU CONSIDER THE DATA IN THIS DECISION, AND THAT MEANS LISTENING TO ALL OF THE DATA.

IT'S CLEAR THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY DIDN'T PROVIDE ALL OF THE RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT DATA FOR YOU TO CONSIDER IT. I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT YOU OPEN THIS UP. FOR MORE DISCUSSION, MORE DEBATE AND MORE CONSIDERATION. YOU DON'T HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE TO SAVE THE RIVER. THE TIME IS NOW FOR YOU TO DO THE RIGHT THING. HUGE PARKING LOT AND IMPERVIOUS PROPERTY AND A LOT OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE GOING TO GO ALONG WITH THIS OR NOT GOOD FOR THE RIVER. THIS IS A FLOODPLAIN. IT IS IN JEOPARDY OF BEING FLOODED AGAIN. WE WERE WITHIN VERY NARROW MARGIN OF BEING FLOODED LAST WEEK. YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK VERY FAR IN TIME TO REALIZE THAT THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE DONE OUR CHANGING THE LANDSCAPE FASTER THAN WE KNOW. AND WE DON'T HAVE ALTERNATIVES TO DOING THAT UNLESS WE PLANNED FOR AND I THINK THAT YOU NEED TO SPEND THE TIME TO PLAN FOR IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

THAT'S ALL OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT. WE HAVE A LAWYER. NOT PER I DON'T SEE YOU, WALTER BOYD. HERE THANK YOU. THIS IS ON THIS MOTION. OKAY SO THIS IS ON THIS MOTION. DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS MOTION? IS IT REGARDING THIS MOTION? OKAY. SOMEONE'S UP THERE NOW. OKAY HELEN. I'M SORRY. I DIDN'T SEE YOU POP UP THERE. MCBRIDE MOVED AB AND I MOVED HERE IN 1973 1 THING I DID WAS TRY TO LEARN THE HISTORY OF THE CITY IS STORED. AND I SITTING HERE AND READING ALL THE ARTICLES AND THE IPAD AND THAT ABOUT PRESERVE LAND. WELL I LEARNED AND I KNOW FOR A FACT. MARTIN COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS. IT'S ON THE CITY DUMP. AND NEXT TO IT WAS PART OF THE CITY DUMP. IT'S NOT PRESERVED LAND. IT'S CITY JUMPED. AND WHEN YOU DIG IN THERE, YOU GET PLASTIC AND GARBAGE THAT DOESN'T ALLOW THE PLASTIC. AND I CAN UNDERSTAND THE PEOPLE WANTING, YOU KNOW, BUT WE WENT 14 HOURS THROUGH THIS. AND MAYBE YOU GUYS WEREN'T HERE. BUT WE WERE HERE.

ART COMMISSIONS AT THE TIME AND THE PEOPLE THAT WORK FOR THE CITY DID THEIR WORK. AND IT'S

[01:10:02]

JUST BOTHERS ME THAT AND MY UNCLES. I WAS YOUNG AT ONE TIME. NO IT WAS PRESERVED AND WE GOT BIRDS. I HAVE BEAUTIFUL BIRDS IN MY BACKYARD. IT'S JUST IT IS PART OF OUR OWN LANDFILL. NO MATTER WHICH WAY YOU LOOK AT IT. IT'S NOT PRESERVED LAND. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, HELEN WALTER.

THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS MY I'M WALTER LLOYD. AND I THINK IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS FROM, UH, LINDA KAY'S TESTIMONY THAT THAT WAS NEVER A DUMP HER FAMILY'S OWN THAT PROPERTY FOR A LONG, LONG TIME. SO I DON'T KNOW WHY SOMEBODY WOULD BE MOTIVATED TO COME UP HERE AND TELL THAT KIND OF THING. BUT ANYWAY, I'M HERE TO REQUEST THAT YOU NOTIFY THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET. THE ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION THAT YOU WITHDRAW ALL EXCEPTIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. JUDGES RECOMMENDED ORDER. RESCIND THE APPROVAL OF COSTCO PROJECT COORDINATES 24 66 2021 REPEAL THE AMENDMENT. IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED THAT THIS IS NOT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE OF STEWART, AS YOU HAVE REPRESENTED TO THE STATE AT THE LAST CABINET MEETING. THE OPPOSITION TO THIS PROJECT WAS NEVER AGAINST CASCO OR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY. HOWEVER WE DID OPPOSE THE PROPOSED LOCATION. THE COVERT METHODS WITH. LACK OF REPRESENTATION IN TRANSPARENCY AND THE PROCESSES LEADING TO THE APPROVALS OF THIS PROJECT. SUCH AS EVIDENCE OF ALLOWING ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES WITH INTENTIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT. WHICH WOULD RADICALLY CHANGE THE LAND USE AND CONSERVATION VALUE OF COUNTY LANDS WHILE DETRACTING FROM THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE AREA, OF WHICH I AM ONE AID TO THE DEVELOPERS, AND THEY'RE EXPERTS IN PROGRESSION OF THEIR PROJECTS WHILE IGNORING THE ASPECTS, TESTIMONY OF THE INTERVENERS EXPERTS WOULDN'T IT HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE THING TO PROPOSE PONE THE DECISION THAT YOU MADE FOR FURTHER STUDY AFTER YOU HEARD THOSE EXPERTS, I WOULD HAVE BEEN THE RESPONSIBLE THING. THERE WAS EVEN EVIDENCE OF SCREENING BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF CITIZENS EMAILS WITH PREJUDICED AGAINST THOSE OPPOSING NEGATIVE ELOPEMENT AT THAT LOCATION. IN FACT, THERE WERE FAR MORE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY AND CITY PRESENT AT THE PLANNING AND COMMISSION MEETINGS WHO OPPOSED THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT. THAT'S YOUR EVIDENCE. THE VERY PEOPLE WHO YOU REPRESENT HAVE PROVIDED TAX REVENUES TO ALLOW YOU TO CREATE THESE INJUSTICES. AND THEN HAD TO SPEND THEIR PRIVATE MONIES, WHICH IS PROBABLY WHY WE DIDN'T GO THE WAY THAT MR MARTEL SAID. BECAUSE IT WAS A MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE AVENUE. THEN THE APPROACH WE TOOK WITH LIMITED FUNDS. AND TO PRESENT THE TESTIMONY WHICH YOU IGNORED AND TO DEFEND OUR POSITION IN THE COURT OF LAW. WE HAD TO SPEND OUR MONEY. AND WHERE WE PREVAILED, AND NOW YOU CONTINUE TO SPEND OUR TAX DOLLARS. IN PRIVATE MONIES TO BUT TO DEFY THE TRUE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. WHY YOU KEEP DOING THIS? WE DON'T KNOW. YOU CAN TAKE YOUR TIME IS UP. IT'S TIME FOR CHANGE AND EMOTION. ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS MOTION, EVEN IF IT IS IT ON THIS MOTION. WHY DON'T YOU COME ON UP YOUR NEXT? THANK YOU. NICE TO SEE YOU.

THANK YOU. MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS APPRECIATE YOU ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TODAY AS I WALK IN AT THE LAST MINUTE. I MEAN SAMPLES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES. WE WERE FOUNDED IN 1969 BY MARJORY STONEMAN. DOUGLAS I'M ALSO A PROUD RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF STEWART. FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES HAS SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS REGARDING THE CANNER CPU DIY PROJECT. AND THE THREAT IT POSES TO WETLANDS ON PORTIONS OF THE SITE PER AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S FINDINGS WHILE THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PREPARED BY E. W CONSULTANTS CHARACTERIZE THESE AS LOW QUALITY WETLANDS, GREG BROWN OF SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL PRESENTED EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS NOT THE CASE FOR ALL WETLANDS ON THE SITE, THE LAW JUDGE FOUND MR BROWN'S TESTIMONY CREDIBLE AND ACCURATE. THE PRESENCE OF WAITING BIRDS ON THE SITE ALSO INDICATES THAT W CONSULTANT'S REPORT MAY HAVE BEEN INCOMPLETE OR INACCURATE.

AS INDICATED IN ILLEGAL MEMO WE SENT TO THE CITY ON NOVEMBER 9TH . THE CITY IS WELL WITHIN ITS RIGHTS TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE SETTLING THE CASE BY REPEALING THE COMPLAINT AMENDMENT. IN FACT, THAT IS QUITE A COMMON SCENARIO. WHEN PLAN AMENDMENTS HAVE BEEN FOUND, NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW. THIS IS NOT ABOUT COSTCO, WHICH IS ONLY ONE PART OF THE PROJECT. IT'S ABOUT HONORING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ITS COMMITMENT TO PROTECTING

[01:15:03]

WETLANDS ARE FOUNDER MARJORY STONEMAN. DOUGLAS ONCE SAID FLORIDA HAS MADE GREAT STRIDES, BUT THE DEGRADATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT HAS BECOME INSTITUTIONALIZED. EMBEDDED IN THE NATURE OF THINGS. YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE THAT, AT LEAST WITH THIS INSTANCE IN THIS INSTANCE BY REPEALING THE COMPLAINT AMENDMENT AND SETTLING THIS CASE. SOME OF YOU CAMPAIGNED ON THIS ISSUE. NOW YOU HAVE A CHANCE TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON YOUR COMMITMENTS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MHM RIGHT ? OKAY. I HAVE NO MORE GREEN CARDS. MR MAYOR, IF I COULD JUST CLARIFY WHAT'S BEFORE US. I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE THINK THAT, UM THE COSTCO LANDOWNER DIDN'T JOIN OR DIDN'T PARTICIPATE AND SHOULD HAVE INTERVENED AND THAT DECISION SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE.

BUT PART OF IT IS BECAUSE OF THE ACTUAL APPEAL THAT WAS FILED IF SOMEONE HAD CHALLENGED THE MITIGATION OF THE WETLANDS, OR IF SOMEONE HAD CHALLENGED THE DENSITY OR THE ZONING OR ANY OF THOSE ASPECTS OF IT, IT WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN THE CITY INVOLVED AT ALL. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A CHALLENGE WITH THE COSTCO PROJECT. BUT A DECISION WAS MADE AND I WASN'T THERE. AND I DON'T KNOW WHY. MISS CARTWRIGHT IS PROBABLY THE ONLY ONE IN THE ROOM THAT COULD TELL THE EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. BUT A DECISION WAS MADE TO APPEAL. ADMINISTRATIVELY. AND SAY THAT THE CITY COMMISSIONERS FAILED TO EVALUATE. APPROPRIATE OR RELEVANT DATA AND ANALYSIS, NOT WHETHER OR NOT THEY SHOULD HAVE OR SHOULDN'T HAVE MITIGATED THE WETLANDS TO ALLOW FOR A LAKE OR A JOGGING PATH OR ANY OTHER REDEVELOPMENT. THAT WAS NOT AN ISSUE AND THEN IN THE HEARING HMM. MULTIPLE TIMES I RAISED THIS ISSUE, AND THE JUDGE RULED MULTIPLE TIMES THAT SHE AGREED WITH ME. BUT MR GRASSO STILL SUBMITTED A PROPOSED ORDER. AND WHEN THE JUDGE RULED THAT NONE OF THAT TESTIMONY WAS RELEVANT TO THIS PROCEEDING, MR GRASSO ASKED IF HE COULD GET PROFFERED EVIDENCE, AND THAT MEANS YOU'RE GONNA KEEP IT FOR THE RECORD. AND THEN, SEVERAL MONTHS LATER, THAT EVIDENCE WAS SUBMITTED TO THE JUDGE, AS IF IT WAS THE ISSUE THAT WE WERE TRYING AND IS THAT IT WAS PART OF THE CASE, AND THE JUDGE RULED THAT THE CITY DIDN'T PUT ON ANY EVIDENCE OF THAT PART OF THE CASE. AND YOU KNOW WHAT? SHE WAS 100, RIGHT? I DIDN'T. I DIDN'T HAVE ANY WITNESSES RELATED TO THE ZONING. I DIDN'T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE RELATED TO ZONING. I DIDN'T HAVE ANY EXHIBITS RELATED TO THE ZONING BECAUSE THE STATE STATUTES AND THE JUDGE'S RULING SAID IT WAS NOT ADMISSIBLE. THIS IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT PROCEEDING . THAT, AS MR MOORE TELL, POINTED OUT, CAN BE BROUGHT IN CIRCUIT COURT. SO WHEN I WENT UP TO TALLAHASSEE IN AUGUST, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA, SAID WHEN SHE READ IT, SHE SAID IT WAS COMPLETELY UNFAIR TO THE CITY FOR THE JUDGE TO MAKE THE RULING BASED UPON ME, NOT ADMITTING ANY OTHER EVIDENCE, BECAUSE THAT WASN'T THE PROCEEDING THAT WAS PRESENTED. FOR APPEAL. IF IT HAD BEEN IN CIRCUIT COURT, I COULD HAVE AND WOULD HAVE PRESENTED THAT OTHER EVIDENCE AS IT WAS RELEVANT TO WHATEVER PROCEEDING , BUT THE ISSUE WASN'T WHETHER WE SHOULD HAVE OR SHOULD HAVE MITIGATED THE WETLAND, AND THE ISSUE WASN'T WHETHER IT WAS THE BEST WETLAND OF THE WORST WETLAND IN THE COUNTRY. MR GRASSO WHEN HE FIRST BROUGHT THE PETITION SAID THAT BECAUSE WE BROUGHT THE PETITION AS TO BOTH THE ZONING AND THE LAND USE IN THE SAME PROCEEDING THAT IT OPENED THE DOOR TO ALLOW THAT TO TAKE PLACE, WHICH BY THE WAY, WAS ARGUED IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE. AND STILL REMAINS AN ISSUE BUT BUT WAS RULED BY THE JUDGE THAT NO, THAT'S NOT ALLOWED. WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO IT THAT WAY. AND THE FLORIDA STATUTES, SPECIFICALLY SAYING, BY THE WAY, WHEN WE SAY BROUGHT THE PROCEEDING. WE NEED TO RECOGNIZE THIS WAS A LAND USE APPLICATION BROUGHT BY A LANDOWNER, NOT BY THE CITY OF STEWART, THE APPLICANT MADE THE APPLICATION AND THE STATE STATUTE SPECIFICALLY SAYS THAT IN SITUATIONS WHERE AN APPLICANT MAKES APPLICATION FOR ZONING. THAT THE MUNICIPALITY OR A COUNTY CAN DO BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE SAID THAT HAS SEEN IT SEVERAL TIMES, BUT THAT SHE NEEDS TO SEPARATED. BUT WHEN THE PROFFERED TESTIMONY JUST BY ITS VERY NATURE, THE CONCEPT OF PROFFER MEANS THAT IT WAS RULED INADMISSIBLE. THAT'S WHY IT HAS TO BE PROFFERED. OTHERWISE IT JUST BE REGULAR TESTIMONY. BUT THE PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED HAD ALL THE PROFFERED TESTIMONY IN IT, AS IF THAT WAS STILL THE ISSUE TO BE PRESENTED. SO WHEN THE JUDGE READ IT ALL AND LOOKED AT IT ALL, SHE SAID JESUS SEES STUART DIDN'T PUT ON DIDN'T CHALLENGE ONE BIT OF THIS.

NOTHING. AND SHE WAS RIGHT BECAUSE I DIDN'T BUT THE REASON I DIDN'T WASN'T BECAUSE WE JUST FORGOT IT WAS BECAUSE IT WASN'T ADMISSIBLE AND NOW TO COME ALL THE WAY HERE. AND SAY THAT THE

[01:20:06]

CITY COMMISSIONERS, ALL FIVE OF THEM GOT IT WRONG FOR 14 HOURS STRAIGHT. AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY JUST TOOK THE DAY OFF AND SKIPPED THE HEARING. IT'S JUST NOT TRUE, AND THAT'S NOT WHAT HAPPENED. WHAT'S HAPPENED IS IT'S BEEN CONTINUALLY MISDIRECTED. THE ISSUE ON APPEAL IS NOT WHAT GETS POSTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA. THE ISSUE ON APPEAL IS NOT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE TONIGHT . IT'S A CONSTANT MISDIRECTION TO TRY AND MAKE ME AND THE COMMISSION LOOKED TERRIBLE. AND I'M SORRY IF IT DOES, AND WE HAVEN'T CHALLENGED IT BACK AND WROTE THINGS BACK ON FACEBOOK. BUT THE TRUTH IS I WAS SIMPLY WAITING FOR THE RULING BECAUSE I KNEW THAT IN THE END THE TRUTH WOULD COME OUT AND THAT THE RULING WHICH SHOWS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED. BUT FOR US TO NOW, LITERALLY WHAT THE HEARING ON AUGUST OR DECEMBER 13TH. IS NO MORE ARGUMENT. I DON'T GET A CHANCE TO GO UP THERE AND NOT PUT ANY EVIDENCE ON AGAIN.

THERE'S NOTHING LEFT. THE ACTUAL ARGUMENT TOOK PLACE ON IN AUGUST ON AUGUST 23RD. AND NOW. THE RULING IS ALL THAT COMES OUT ON DECEMBER 13TH. IT'S WHETHER OR NOT. THE STATE OF FLORIDA AGREES THAT MR GRASSO. INTRODUCED A LOT OF EVIDENCE THAT SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED AND MISDIRECTED THE JUDGE AND CAUSED THE JUDGE TO RELY ON IT IN PROPERLY. AND I DON'T KNOW, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME LIKE IF THAT'S THE CASE, WE PROBABLY WANT TO FIND OUT. AND I ALSO I TAKE IT REALLY PERSONALLY WHEN, WHEN KEVIN FREEMAN AND THE STAFF WAS BEING BLAMED FOR NOT PRESENTING SUFFICIENT DATA. FOR THE COMMISSION TO ANALYZE AND I CAN REMEMBER WHEN THE HEARINGS TAKING PLACE BETWEEN 1ST AND 2ND RULING OR HEARING MEETING WITH, UM, THE INTERVENERS AND, UH, JENNY, SHERLOCK AND DOING A PRETRIAL STIPULATION AND ALL THIS EXTRA STUFF AND AT THE END SAYING, OKAY, IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE ANYBODY CAN THINK OF THAT WE COULD POSSIBLY INTRODUCE. THAT WE HAVEN'T ADDRESSED. AND WE WENT THROUGH THE STATUTE 20 DIFFERENT TIMES. AND AS COMMISSIONER CAMPBELL POINTS OUT THE QUALITY OF THE SAND WELL, GUESS WHAT. THERE WAS A REPORT DONE. THERE WERE TWO REPORTS DONE, AND KIM LEE HORN DID A REVIEW. BUT I DIDN'T INTRODUCE IT IN THE APPEAL HEARING BECAUSE THAT WASN'T WHAT WAS ON APPEAL. IN ADDITION TO THAT THERE WERE PROBABLY 100 PEOPLE THAT TESTIFIED DURING THE HEARING OR GAVE PUBLIC COMMENT ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE LAND, SO THERE WAS PLENTY IN THE TRANSCRIPT ON IT. BUT I DIDN'T INTRODUCE THAT DURING THE HEARING. SHE'S RIGHT . I DIDN'T OKAY, BECAUSE IT WASN'T IT. THANK YOU. MINUS MARCUS, COMMISSIONER RICH, BUT I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CALL THE ROLL. MARY. OKAY? COMMISSIONER RICH YES. COMMISSIONER COLLINS.

YES. COMMISSIONER BRUNER NO. MAYOR MCDONALD NO. MOTION FAILS. THANK YOU. OKAY? UH, COMMISSIONER COLLINS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER BRUNER ANY COMMISSIONER COMMENTS? I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE AIR SHOW AND WHAT A WONDERFUL JOB.

THEY DID, UM. I TOOK MY 11 YEAR OLD GRANDSON AND HE HAD THE BEST TIME EVER. UM ANYWAY. THANK YOU.

YOUR SHOW. THANK YOU. UM, JUST A COUPLE QUICK THINGS FOR ME. ONE IS, UM WE HAD ANOTHER STORM EVENT LAST WEEK, AND THANKFULLY , WE CAME THROUGH THAT QUITE WELL. I WANT TO THANK CITY STAFF . THE STORM CAME UP VERY QUICKLY AND ARE STAFFED AT A WONDERFUL, WONDERFUL JOB OF PREPARING THE CITY. UM AGAIN. WE WERE WE DODGED A BULLET. UM AND AHH. EVERY TIME WE HAVE AN EVENT LIKE THIS, WE DO SEE WHERE OUR THROUGHOUT OUR CITY WHERE OUR WEAKNESSES ARE. AND I KNOW THAT THEY'RE KEEPING NOTE ON IT UNTIL WE CAN KEEP IMPROVING AND MAKING THE CITY MORE STRONGER AND MORE RESILIENT. UM I ALSO JUST WANT TO SAY I'VE RECENTLY WAS SPEAKING WITH SOME FOLKS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY THAT WERE TELLING ME HOW GREAT OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT IS AND HOW THEY WORK IN THEIR CARPENTERS AND SMALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES AND HOW WHEN THEY NEED TO GET PERMITS FOR AIR CONDITIONING AND ROOFS AND WHATEVER IT IS, THEY'RE DOING. HOW HOW WELL THEY GET IT DONE. AND. THERE'S A WOMAN THAT'S NEW EMPLOYEE HERE. VAL, I THINK IS HER NAME. SHE'S OUR CUSTODIAN, AND, UH AND I KNOW SHE'S PROBABLY NOT HEAR DIS EVENING, BUT SHE DOESN'T AMAZING JOB. I'VE NEVER SEEN SOMEONE SO HAPPY IS THERE YOU KNOW SHE'S KEEPING THE PLACE CLEANER AND IT'S PROBABLY EVER BED AND, UH AND SHE IS JUST SO ENTHUSIASTIC. AND I JUST I JUST LOVE TO SEE

[01:25:07]

THAT AND WE'RE SO BLESSED TO HAVE SUCH GOOD EMPLOYEES HERE IN, UH, STEWART. SO AND JUST AGAIN. THANK YOU. EVERYBODY IN CITY STAFF ARE DOING A GREAT JOB OF KEEPING THE CITY TOGETHER DURING THE DURING THE STORM, SO COMMISSIONERS, BUT I HOPE BEFORE WE GO TO COMMENTS BY MANAGER LET'S ALWAYS DAVE DIASPORA. HAPPY BIRTHDAY. OH, WHEN YOU SING HIM HAPPY THURSDAY. YEAH WE WON'T DO THAT. THEY'RE NOT DOING MESS. THERE'S PROBABLY ENOUGH CAKE LEFT BACK THERE FOR THE ENTIRE AUDIENCE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, DAVID. IT'S HAPPY BIRTHDAY. THEY'RE NOT ANSWERING THAT QUESTION. WELL SEE, THAT'S 1 TO 6. OKAY ANY COMMENTS, SIR? OKAY OKAY, SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. YOU HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. DO OKAY. SO MOVED BY COMMISSIONER RICH SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BRUNER, UM ALL IN FAVOR FOR APPROVAL OF THE

[COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (3 Minutes Max.)]

AGENDA. SAY AYE, ANY OPPOSED OKAY, WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON TO COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC FOR NON AGENDA ITEMS, AND THERE'S TWO ITEMS HERE. THERE'S A GENTLEMAN I GUESS MAY HAVE TO LEAVE THAT WANTED TO SPEAK ON ITEM. 21 I BELIEVE IT WAS AND I'M GOING TO FIND IT HERE. UM I THINK HE'S.

OH, YES, IF YOU COULD. WHAT WAS YOUR NAME AGAINST BERT MOUTHS, BURTON MOUTH, BIRD AND CHIEF.

COULD YOU HELP HIM OUT? CLOCK RUNNING. SHOULD I GET? YEAH LIKE HE'S RUNNING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE YOU TAKING ME OUT OF OUT OF TURN. I HAVE SCHEDULING ISSUES. I'M HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT THE PROPOSED A DOG KENNEL IN THE FRASER CRESCENT NEIGHBORHOOD. UM A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND. I'VE LIVED IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR 20 YEARS. I COME TO HERE, UH, A GRADUATE IN ARCHITECTURE FROM UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, A MASTERS IN URBAN DESIGN FROM UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND DOCTORAL STUDIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN . GO BIG 10. LET'S GET REAL BASIC. WHAT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL PURPOSE OF THE CITY OF STEWART? I PROPOSE THAT STEWART EXISTS TO PROVIDE HOMES AND SUPPORT TO ITS CITIZENS. SECONDARILY BUSINESSES. WHICH THE CITIZENS OUR CUSTOMERS. WE RELY ON THE CITY FOR REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT, POLICE, FIRE MEDICINE, SCHOOL LIBRARIES, AMENITIES PARKS IN THEATERS. WE THE RESIDENTS OF FRASER CRESCENT TREASURE OUR COMMUNITY FOR ITS FULFILLING THIS PRIMARY FUNCTION. THIS IS WHERE WE LIVE OUR LIVES. IT IS A LOVELY NEIGHBORHOOD. PROPOSED KENNEL IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH OUR FRAGILE COMMUNITIES. REASON FOR BEING. WE REMAIN UNCONVINCED THAT THE BARKING WILL NOT BE READILY APPARENT. THE PREVIOUS OCCUPANT WAS A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING. DAILY TRAFFIC CORRESPONDED WITH THE MORNING AND EVENING FLOWS AND WAS TOLERATED. DOG DROP OFFS WILL HAVE RANDOM TIMING AND LOCAL TRAFFIC DISRUPTION. IN CONCLUSION. WE STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE CONVERSION OF A TOLERABLE NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE. INTO A KENNEL IN URGE YOU COUNCIL MEMBERS IN THE INTERESTS OF NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION TO DISAPPROVE OF THE KETTLE PROJECT . THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY NEXT SPEAKER IS KAREN HALL. YOST BRUSH. OKAY. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. I'M SORRY.

UH, TO COMMISSIONER COLLINS OR THE NONSENSE THAT YOU WENT THROUGH AND ANYWAY? OH YES. I WANTED TO GIVE THIS GIVE THAT TO THE MAYOR SO WE CAN GO THROUGH IT TOGETHER. THANK YOU, SIR.

OVER HERE. YEAH SO HE CAN GO THROUGH IT WITH ME. OKAY ALRIGHT , SO A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE THAT OUR CASE REALLY IS A DEVELOPMENT CASE BECAUSE WE HAVE 1.4 ACRES HERE IN HOLLYOAKS TRUDGE 17. OH, ONE SOUTH WEST PALM CITY ROAD. 30 YEAR, RESIDENTS 16 IN STEWART 30 IN MARTIN COUNTY. SO HERE WE GO. THIS IS HOW IT WENT DOWN. I DID GIVE A FILING TO A COUPLE OF COMMISSIONERS. BUT I'M JUST GOING TO GIVE YOU THE QUICK STUFF. ALL RIGHT, SO HERE WE GO, MAYOR. FIRST THING THAT THEY DID. HERE WE GO. WE HAVE A, UH, STOP MY TIME. I NEED THE MIRROR TO GO THROUGH THIS WITH ME. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. ALL RIGHT. SO HERE WE START WITH THIS CITY PER

[01:30:05]

LAND WITHOUT WILLIAMS SIGNATURE THAT STARTS. NEXT IS OUR COMPLIANCE. THAT WAS NOT IT WAS COMPLETELY COMPLIED IN DECEMBER 6TH, AND THEY WERE IT WAS NOT PUT IN UNTIL MAY 7TH HERE. I THINK SHERRY WHITE IS HERE. AND YES, SO THEY HID THAT OUR COMPLIANCE WE HAD ALWAYS COMPLIED. THE LIE WAS THEY WERE BAD PEOPLE. THEY DIDN'T COMPLY. THEN WE HAVE THE CITY HOW THEY MOVED US OFF OUR PROPERTY AND THEN WOULDN'T EVEN LET US GO ON IT. THAT WAS DIRTY. THEN WE HAVE THE CONSPIRACY. WE HAVE THE PROPERTY APPRAISER LOOKING FOR INFO THAT WOULD JUSTIFY REMOVING OUR HOMESTEAD. AT THE SAME TIME. WE HAVE COMMISSIONER MCDONALD'S SAYING, OH, I KNOW THE CURRENT ONE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OF THE LITIGATION, YOU KNOW, ARE THEY ABLE TO MAINTAIN THEIR HOMESTEAD , EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE NOT RESIDING THERE, BECAUSE THE CITY THREW US OUT, HE SAYS, YOU KNOW , CAN WE BREAK THAT? SO WE'VE GOT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER TRYING TO BREAK IT. TROY TRY TO BREAK IT, AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE THE CONSPIRACY OF THE POLICE, GLORIA FIKE AND THEN EVEN ON THIS FROM THE PROPERTY PIECE THAT THEY PUT KEN SUNDHEIM DEAD. THAT WAS OUR ATTORNEY. WHY? WOULD YOU LIST? SOMEBODY'S ATTORNEY WAS DEAD. OH, THAT'S SO YOU COULD DO YOUR BAD DEED. THEN WITH THE MR MOORE TELLS ALWAYS SAYING, THERE'S A SETTLEMENT. WELL WHO WAS IN ON THIS SETTLEMENT? CASEY DANIELS ASSOCIATE AUCTION AND COMMISSIONER MCDONALD. OH WOW.

AND WHY WOULD THEY HAVE DONE ALL THIS TO US? DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE? YES WHEN YOU REALIZE IT WAS THIBAULT CHINO TERRACE. THEY WANTED TO PUT UP 16 TOWN HOMES. AND I THINK MR MCCARTHY IS RIGHT HERE WITH US, SO HE KNOWS ABOUT IT, AND HERE'S ANOTHER PICTURE. OF WHAT THEY DID TO TRY TO MAKE MONEY. SO WE HAVE A FILING AT WIN ON OCTOBER 31ST. MR MARTEL SAID. HE'S NOT GOING TO COME TO THE HEARING, WHICH IS FINE. HE'S A WITNESS. THAT'S IN HERE. THANK YOU. YOUR TIME IS UP. THIS IS FOR THE WATCHDOG. UM STEWART NEWS HERE. IS UM, HERE. OKAY? ROBYN CARTWRIGHT. WATCHDOG.

NOBODY WANTS ANYONE. EVERYONE. CAMERA. HIGH COMMISSIONERS. I JUST WANT TO GIVE A HYPOTHETICAL ABOUT WHAT A LAWSUIT FROM A PETITIONER LOOKS LIKE, SO I'M GOING TO USE MY THREE MINUTES TO DISCUSS THAT. WHEN WE FILED IT WAS AGAINST THE CITY BECAUSE OF THE FUTURE LAND USE. SO FOR THOSE WHO ARE LISTENING AND DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS THAT COMES BEFORE ZONING AND EXCITE MAP. IN ORDER FOR AN APPLICANT TO BE ABLE TO APPLY TO GET CERTAIN ZONING. THE CITY HAS TO DESIGNATE A LAND USE ASSIGNMENT AND THE ONE THAT WAS ASSIGNED BY THE CITY OF STEWART, SPECIFIC TO THE CANTOR CPU D WAS NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL DISTRICT. THAT IS WHAT THE LAWSUIT WAS FOR. THAT IS WHY WE FILED AND THAT IS WHY WE WENT TO TALLAHASSEE. WHAT I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER RICH WAS ASKING FOR IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, WAS TO REMOVE THE OBJECTIONS FROM THE CITY BECAUSE WHEN WE GO BACK TO TALLAHASSEE, THEORETICALLY, HYPOTHETICALLY, THREE THINGS CAN HAPPEN. ONE THE FLORIDA CABINET CAN AGREE WITH THE PETITIONER. THAT'S US WHEN WE WON THE LAWSUIT. TWO THEY CAN SIDE WITH THE CITY OF STEWART, IN WHICH CASE WE WILL APPEAL OR THREE. IT CAN GO BACK TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FOR CONSIDERATION TO REWRITE HER DECISION. THOSE ARE THE THREE OPTIONS THAT WILL COME BEFORE THE CABINET THAT THEY WILL MAKE A DECISION. SO MR MARTEL IS CORRECT. THERE IS NO NEW EVIDENCE THAT WILL BE SUBMITTED BECAUSE WE DID NOT FILE AGAINST ANYTHING EXCEPT THE FUTURE LAND USE AND THAT LAND USE DECISION WAS BASED ON ALL OF THE EXPERT TESTIMONY WAS PROVIDED DURING THE INTERVENERS TESTIMONY, AND THEY'RE HEARING THAT HAPPENED IN MAY AND IN AUGUST. AND THEN IT HAPPENED AGAIN IN NOVEMBER BECAUSE THE CITY HAD A CHANCE TO REBUT WHAT WE WERE FIGHTING AND OPTED NOT TO. FOR WHATEVER REASON, COSTCO AND THE APPLICANT CHOSE TO NOT GET INVOLVED. SO AGAIN. I'M DISAPPOINTED THAT THE CITY WOULD TAKE SUCH A STANCE TO MAKE A DECISION TO WASTE TAXPAYER MONEY FOR US TO GO BACK TO TALLAHASSEE IN DECEMBER TO HAVE THEM MAKE A DECISION. THAT YOU MAY NOT BE HAPPY WITH EITHER BECAUSE YOU WANT AND WE'RE GOING TO APPEAL OR BECAUSE YOU LOST AND WE WERE ON THE RIGHT SIDE THE WHOLE TIME. EXHALE. WELCOME MARK. HOW ARE YOU? GOOD. GOOD TO SEE YOU. MARK BRADFIELD TO EIGHT SOUTHEAST I SEE ALL THE STREETS. STUART FLORIDA JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS NOT RELATIVE TO THE SPECIFIC ISSUE THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT, GENERAL COMMON, UM TO REALLY ONE EVERYBODY HATES THAT PROJECT, AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OTHER STUFF. EVERYBODY HATES IT. AND IF THE CITIZENS UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH THAT'S GOING TO COST THEM AND THEY'RE WILLING TO SPEND THAT, AND I THINK THE COMMISSIONER HAS TO HONOR THAT. UM, SO, SO THAT'S A SEPARATE ISSUE, AND I THINK WHEN THE CITIZENS SAY WE DON'T WANT SOMETHING YOU GOT TO DO WITH THE CITIZENS SAY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHY THEY ELECTED YOU ALL RIGHT. SECOND WE ALSO HAVE TO AGGRESSIVELY FIGHT FOR OUR

[01:35:04]

STAFF. WE HAVE TO BACK OUR STAFF UP AND WE HAVE TO SUPPORT OUR STAFF. BECAUSE IF WE DON'T EVERY SINGLE PROJECT WE DO IN THE FUTURE WILL BE CHALLENGED, AND SOMETIMES THOSE PROJECTS WILL BE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT, AND WE'LL BE LOSING BECAUSE SOME DEVELOPER WILL CHALLENGE US BECAUSE WE WERE DEEMED NOT TO BE EFFICIENT NOT TO BE APPROPRIATE AND WHAT WE DO IN OUR STAFF'S JOB. PLUS WE'RE NEVER GOING TO HAVE ANY STAFF IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THEM. SO I THINK PERSONALLY ON ISSUES LIKE THIS, THE COMMISSION HAS TO BACK THE STAFF. EVEN IF YOU WEREN'T A COMMISSIONER AT THE TIME YOU HAVE TO BACK THE STAFF. WE HAVE TO SUPPORT THAT. IF WE THEN TURN AROUND AND CHALLENGE IT, TAKE IT INTO COURT AND FIGHT AGAINST OURSELVES TO GET IT. OUT THEN THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TO DO, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THE CITIZENS WANT US TO DO. BUT I THINK YOU HAVE SEEN A TREND OVER THE LAST. PROBABLY 15 YEARS OF KIND OF NEW COMMISSIONS, BACKING AWAY FROM OLD OLD DECISIONS BASED ON, UH, USING THE STAFF AS A AS A WHIPPING BOARD FOR THAT, AND I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD DO THAT. I THINK WE NEED TO BE VERY COGNIZANT. THE FACT THAT WE NEED THE STAFF AND WE NEED TO SUPPORT THEM, BECAUSE OTHERWISE WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU. MARK TENNIS TOFFEE. IT EVEN HAD A STALL FEE. 29 COCONUT I JUST WANTED TO FOLLOW UP. UH, MR MCDONALD ON WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT THE POST HURRICANE RECOVERY IN YOUR STAFF. AND I KNOW MILTON DOESN'T LIKE WHEN I USE HIS NAME, BUT HE'S RIGHT OVER THERE. IF ANYONE DOESN'T KNOW MILTON, THERE HE IS . MILTON IS THE BEST. I WAS UP AT SUNRISE AND WALKING AROUND MY NEIGHBORHOOD AS I USUALLY DO AFTER A STORM SURVEY THINGS, AND WHILE I HAD POWER, THE PEOPLE BEHIND ME AND TOWARDS THE CREEK DID NOT. AND, UH, MILTON WAS OUT DRIVING THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I DO IN THE SURVEY. I DIDN'T NOTICE AT THE TIME. BUT THERE WAS A POWER LINE DOWN LIVE POWER LINE DOWN IN ONE OF OUR ROADS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE WAS ANOTHER GENTLEMAN FROM THE FROM THE STAFF THAT WAS WORKING IN THE MEDIAN. ONCE I FOUND OUT ABOUT THE LIVE POWER LINE AND WENT AND TOLD HIM AND HE IMMEDIATELY LEFT OVER. HE WAS DOING AND CALLED. I HEARD HIM CALL YOU MILTON, AND WITHIN 30 MINUTES, THE CITY HAD A REPAIR CREW. THEY'RE TAKING CARE OF THAT LIVEWIRE. AND I HAVE SEEN WITH MY NEIGHBOR SAID YEAH. IT WENT DOWN LATE LAST NIGHT. I CALLED SOMEBODY YOU DON'T KNOW WHO BUT CERTAINLY NOT A CITY HALL. SO I JUST WANT TO COMMEND YOU AND YOUR STAFF AND MILTON FOR JUMPING ON THAT LIVEWIRE COULD HAVE. TWO OF THE FOUR PEOPLE WHO DIED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA DIED FROM ELECTRIC ELECTROCUTIONS. SO THANK YOU, TED. AND AGAIN. THANK YOU, MILTON. HMM. HMM. LINDA K. RICHARDS. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. WHAT WAS ASKED TONIGHT BY COMMISSIONER RICH WAS FOR YOU GUYS TO HAVE A DISCUSSION. AND TWO OF YOU VOTED TO NOT EVEN HAVE A RUSSIAN. THAT CONCERNS ME GREATLY. AND IT SHOULD CONCERN ALL THE CITY OF STEWART. TWO COMMISSIONERS WANTED TO HAVE A DISCUSSION. IN TWO WEEKS ON THE AGENDA. ABOUT A VERY IMPORTANT MATTER IN THE CITY OF STEWART. DISCUSSION. AND YOU SAID NO. YOU CAN CLAIM ABOUT ALL THE HOURS OF HEARINGS AND WE ALL KNOW WHO TOOK UP THE MAJORITY OF THAT FIRST HEARING.

LEAVING THE CITIZENS AT 12 30 IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT TO MAKE THEIR PUBLIC COMMENT. TO YOU. A DISCUSSION. MAYOR MCDONALD COMMISSIONER BRUNER DISCUSSION. OKAY NEXT ITEM IS. UH ACTUALLY, FOR I DON'T 15, WHICH IS PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. KATIE CREWS . WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME AND SPEAK NOW SINCE WE'LL BE PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA? TELL YOU WHAT IF YOU CAN HOLD ON COMMISSION ACT COMMISSIONED? ACTUALLY, I THOUGHT IT WAS CONSENT AGENDA. I'M SORRY I MADE IT. GOOD TRY. NOPE YOU'RE RIGHT . I APOLOGIZE. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA?

[CONSENT CALENDAR]

MOTION OF GROUPS. SECOND OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AND SECOND BY MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLLINS AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER RICH AND DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT AND THE CONSENT AGENDA? MARRIED. YOU CALL THE ROLL. COMMISSIONER COLLINS YES, BRUNER. YES.

MCDONALD YES, YES. OKAY NO. GET BACK TO MY GET BACK IN ORDER HERE. OKAY ITEM NUMBER 15

[15. RENEWAL OF FLAGLER CENTER LEASE WITH STUART MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION, INC. (RC) RESOLUTION No. 106-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA TO AUTHORIZE A THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTH ABSOLUTE TRIPLE NET - UNSUBORDINANTED LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL BETWEEN THE CITY OF STUART AND STUART MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION, INC. FOR THE "FLAGLER CENTER" LOCATED AT 121 SW FLAGLER AVENUE, STUART; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

[01:40:05]

RENEWAL THE FLAG OVER CENTER, AT LEAST WITH STUART MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION. OKAY DAVID OR MIKE ? ARE YOU GONNA READ THE RESOLUTION? ITS RESOLUTION NUMBER ONE. OH 6-202 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA TO AUTHORIZE A 36 MONTH ABSOLUTE TRIPLE NET ON SUBORDINATED LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL BETWEEN THE CITY OF STEWART AND STEWART MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION INC. FOR THE FLAGLER CENTER, LOCATED AT 1 TO 1, SOUTHWEST FLAGLER AVENUE, STEWART PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

OKAY AND IT'S SO MR TROTSKY IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SHE MAY HAVE AS IT RELATES TO THE FLAG RELEASE JUST A COUPLE OF TIDBITS OF INFORMATION PRIOR TO ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT IT. WE ENTERED INTO THIS LEASE. UM AND AT THE BEGINNING WE GAVE THEM A LEEWAY WAS ABOUT SIX MONTHS BEFORE WE WERE TO START COLLECTING RENT AND THEN COVID HIT AND AT THAT POINT, THE COMMISSION AGREED TO ALLOW AN EXTENSION PRIOR TO COLLECTING ANY LEASE FUNDS FROM THAT. SO SINCE THAT POINT, AND SINCE THEY'VE BEGUN BEING ABLE TO RENT THE CENTER OUT WE'VE COLLECTED APPROXIMATELY $64,000 TO DATE AND IT IS IT IS IN LINE WITH WHAT OUR PREVIOUS TENANT I BELIEVE WAS PAYING FOR THE LEASE ON THE ON THE AGREEMENT, AND THEY'RE ASKING FOR AN EXTENSION OF ANOTHER THREE YEAR TERM. OKAY. DO WE HAVE A ANY COMMENTS OR EMOTION? I HAVE. I MAY HAVE SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT. THE AGREEMENT. OKAY? SO IT'S IT SEEMS. LIKE THERE'S A FEW DIFFERENT MOVING PARTS. I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND SORT OF THE CITY'S RELATIONSHIP WITH MAIN STREET AS WELL. UM SPECIFICALLY , THE CONVERSATION IS AROUND THE LEASE OF THE FLAGLER CENTER, BUT I HAD A COUPLE OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT SOME OF THE OTHER MOVING PARTS TO JUST FOR UNDERSTANDING.

UM ONE IS THE GREEN MARKET. DOES THE GREENMARKET? UH DOES THE CITY RECEIVE NET? FROM THE GREEN MARKET. OR IS THAT NET FROM THE GREENMARKET GOING TO MAIN STREET? THERE IS A PERCENTAGE OF THE GREEN MARKET THAT DOES COME BACK TO THE CITY. THAT IS PURSE . IT'S VERY MINIMAL, I THINK, WELL THIS PAST YEAR IT WAS A LITTLE OVER $2000 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. PLEASE COME UP TO THEM. I CAN COME UP TO THE MICROPHONES SO WE CAN HAVE YOU ON THE RECORD AND IT'S JIM CURL, SKI COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR FOR THE RECORD. WELCOME, CANDACE. FOR THE RECORD. CANDICE CALLAHAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR STEWART, MAIN STREET. UM, THE. WHEN THE GREENMARKET AGREEMENT CAME UP TO, OR THE OPPORTUNITY TO HELP RUN THE GREENMARKET FOR OUR CITY AND OUR COMMUNITY, UM, WE NEGOTIATED PART OF OUR RFP THAT WE SUBMITTED WAS TO GIVE BACK A 20% OF OUR NET. THAT WASN'T DONE IN PREVIOUS YEARS WITH THE PREVIOUS OPERATOR OF THE GREEN MARKET, SO RIGHT THERE. THE CITY IS ALREADY GETTING MORE, BUT I THINK WE NEED TO FOCUS ON WHAT THE GREENMARKET ACTUALLY MEANS AND STANDS FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTIRE CITY.

COUNTY REGION. UM BUT WE ALSO DO PAY AN ANNUAL LEASE FOR THE SPACE WE ACTUALLY PAY TO USE THE SPACE EVERY WEEK. HOW MUCH IS THAT? YOU KNOW, SO THAT'S ABOUT I THINK 1500 A YEAR 2100 CORRECT. AND THEN I THINK OUR 20% WAS THIS YEAR BECAUSE IT WAS OUR FIRST YEAR OF HAVING THE MARKET WITH ONLY HAD IT FOR JUST LITTLE OVER A YEAR. I THINK WE ACTUALLY GAVE BACK AROUND $5600 NOT 7600. I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBER. HE DOESN'T HAVE IT IN FRONT OF HIM. I'M SORRY, BUT YES. SO IT IS ABOUT $5600 THAT WE DID GIVE BACK TO THE CITY OF STEWART, WHICH WE NEGOTIATED AS PART OF OUR RFP TO HAVE THOSE FUNDS PUT TOWARDS A FUTURE PROJECT, TOO. FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN BECAUSE AGAIN THAT'S THE WHOLE MAIN STREET MISSION IS TO HELP THE DOWNTOWN. SO ANY FUNDS THAT WE RAISE GOES BACK INTO HELPING OUR DOWNTOWN PUTTING ON OUR COMMUNITY EVENTS LIKE THE GREENMARKET, WHICH IS ACTUALLY A HUGE EXPENSE, AND WE'VE SHARED OUR BUDGET. THAT'S SO YOU'RE BEING MORE THAN HAPPY TO LOOK OVER THAT WITH YOU AS WELL. SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE WHAT IT ACTUALLY TAKES TO RUN A MARKET ASKING THESE QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT KNOW. PLEASE TAKE THIS AS, UM. NOT APPRECIATING WHAT YOU'RE DOING. MY OR THAT YOU GUYS ARE DOING GREAT THINGS MY WHOLE CONVERSATION AROUND. THIS IS TO UNDERSTAND, BUT ALSO TO ASK CRITICAL QUESTIONS AS AN AGENT FOR RESIDENTS TO TRY TO GET THE BEST DEAL. FOR TAXPAYERS

[01:45:03]

. IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT ANY SORT OF ASSAULT ON YOU OR ANYTHING YOU'RE DOING SO OH, NO, NO. SO OKAY, SO THE NEXT WOULD BE. THERE'S GREENMARKET. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO, UM. COMMISSIONER COLLINS CAN I SHARE WITH YOU? THE FOUR AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAVE . THANK YOU. WE HAVE ROCKIN RIVERWALK, WHICH IS AN ANNUAL LICENSE AGREEMENT. WE HAVE MARKET ON MAIN, FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE GREEN MARKET, WHICH WE JUST DISCUSSED BRIEFLY. WE HAVE THE FLAGLER LEASE, WHICH IS THE ITEM THAT YOU'RE DISCUSSING NOW AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE A SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH STUART MAIN STREET AS WELL, SO THEY'RE REALLY FOUR DIFFERENT ARRANGEMENTS. UM, QUICKLY. THE ROCK AND RIVERWALK ARRANGEMENT. QUICK SUMMARY ON THAT RIVER WALK IS HELD EVERY NOT WHAT IT IS THE DETAILS, FINANCIALLY FINANCIAL DETAILS AND TRYING IT'S ANOTHER $1500 100 OK, 1500 A YEAR TO OFFER FREE MUSIC FOR OUR COMMUNITY TO ENJOY TO HELP ADD VIBRANCY TO OUR DOWNTOWN. IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE NUMBER, THE LICENSE AGREEMENT IS OR THE SERVICE AGREEMENT IS 70 A YEAR.

UM AND WE JUST DISCUSSED THE MARKET ON MAIN. AND THEN WE HAVE THE LEASE AGREEMENT IN FRONT OF US. SO WITHIN THOSE DIFFERENT ARRANGEMENTS, MY THOUGHT PROCESSES. SO LET'S LET'S TAKE THAT 70,000 YEAR 5800 MONTH AGREEMENT RIGHT FROM MY UNDERSTANDING AND CORRECT CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. THE IDEA WAS INITIALLY TO HAVE THAT AND THEN SORT OF DE ESCALATE THAT TOWARDS ZERO AS MARKET ON MAIN STREET GOT A ON THEIR FEET . WELL, THAT WAS THE TIME. THAT WAS THAT SERVICE AGREEMENT WAS BEFORE THE MARKET EVEN CAME IN AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE GREENMARKET. BUT I THOUGHT YOU SAID THE MARKET MARKET ON MAIN STREET OR MAIN STREET. SORRY.

STUART MAIN STREET. OKAY. SO SINCE AGREEMENT WAS ORIGINALLY, UM, PUT ONTO A GLIDING PATH IN WHICH IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE STAIR STEPPED DOWN OVER TIME. UM AND LAST YEAR WE RENEWED IT AGAINST THE COMMISSION VOTED TO RENEW THE AGREEMENT. THREE YEARS HANDS. WHAT'S THE TIME FRAME ON THAT THAT YEARLY OR IS THAT 31 YEAR? ONE YEAR? ONE YEAR RIGHT LAST FISCAL YES SERVICE AGREEMENT. WOULD YOU, CANDACE? WOULD YOU SAY THAT? AT THIS POINT, MAIN STREET THAT YOU YOU GUYS ARE UP ON YOUR FEET. SIR, I DON'T THINK IT HAS. I DON'T THINK IT'S A QUESTION OF US BEING ON OUR FEET. IT'S ABOUT PROVIDING THE SERVICES TO OUR CITY AND WHAT THAT'S WORTH. IN MY EYES, AND IN MY OPINION, I THINK MY BOARD SHARES THE SAME OPINION. I DON'T THINK THERE SHOULD BE A CONVERSATION OF, UM IT SEEMS LIKE A LARGE NUMBER, BUT ON THE BIG SCALE. IT'S NOT.

I THINK WE'RE ACTUALLY POSITIONING OURSELVES TO AH, UM TO INCREASE THAT VALUE AND TO INCREASE THAT WORTH EXPANDING OUR PROGRAM BECAUSE AS ANY NONPROFIT, AND I'LL REMIND EVERYONE IN THIS ROOM THAT NOT MAIN STREET IS NOT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY. WE ARE A PRIVATE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION OF FIVE OH ONE C THREE NONPROFIT, SO WE HAVE TO HAVE THESE CONSISTENT STREAMS THESE REVENUE STREAMS TO SUSTAIN. AS WE'VE SUSTAINED FOR THE LAST 35 YEARS, PROUDLY SERVING OUR COMMUNITY AND WE CONTINUE TO WE WANT TO CONTINUE TO GROW AND ADD VALUE WERE ONE OF THE MOST MATURE MAIN STREET PROGRAMS AND ALL OF THE COUNTRY. AND WE'VE DONE A LOT. ARE ORIGINATORS ARE DEVELOPERS ARE HERE. ANDY MCMILLAN IS A LEGEND . SHE SHE. CAN SPEAK TO THE HISTORY IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OUTSIDE OF HERE, BUT AS PER THE QUESTION, BUT YOUR QUESTION WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED, AND THAT WAS BEFORE MY TIME AS WELL. SO YOU AND I ARE BOTH KIND OF ALSO LEARNING AND NAVIGATING THESE WATERS. BUT I DON'T I DON'T THINK THE CONVERSATION NO MATTER WHAT NONPROFITS SHOULD EVER AND THEY ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A PRIVATE ENTITY OR MUNICIPALITY, WHOMEVER GOVERNMENT AGENCY. THE QUESTION IS, IT SHOULD BE SHOULDN'T BE ABOUT HOW DO WE GET THEM OFF OUR BUDGET? IT SHOULD BE. HOW CAN WE HELP THEM CONTINUE TO GROW AND PROVIDE MORE FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND PARTNERSHIP. IT'S A PARTNERSHIP. IT'S A PARTNERSHIP.

BUT AS AS PER SPECIFICALLY TO TONIGHT WITH THE FLAG WILL RELEASE THAT PART OF THE ARRANGEMENT WAS SIX MONTHS WITHOUT PAYING RENT, SO THAT YOU COULD GET UP ON YOUR FEET ALONG WITH THAT ORIGINAL 70 GRAND TO GET UP ON YOUR FEET. THAT WAS THE WEREN'T ABLE TO UTILIZE THE FLAGLER TO FUNDRAISE BECAUSE OF COVID. SO WITH THE GRACE OF THE COMMISSION AND THE GENEROSITY OF

[01:50:02]

THE COMMISSION, THEY HAD VOTED TO EXTEND NOT ALLOWED NOT HAVE US PAY RENT AS A GOOD LANDLORD WOULD DO TO ANYONE IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES SO, THEREFORE, I MEAN, WE STILL ACTED ON OUR SERVICE AGREEMENT. I MEAN, I HAVE TO REPORT TO THE CITY EVERY QUARTER ON HOW WE'VE ACTED IN, YOU KNOW, SATISFY THE SERVICE AGREEMENT BECAUSE THAT'S THAT'S THE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE IS THE SAME AS YOU WOULD CONTRACT AND SOMEBODY TO BUILD YOUR HOME LIKE WE REPORT ON THOSE SERVICES ALSO REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A FULL REVENUE EXPENSE BUDGET, WHICH THEY DO. I FORWARDED IT TO ALL THE COMMISSIONERS. PREVIOUSLY ONE CANVAS SUBMITTED TO ME. AND THAT'S FOR ALL OVER THERE. I MEAN, I THINK MAIN STREET. I MEAN, I THINK THE MARKET WAS IN THAT AND THE FLAGLER CENTER WAS IN THAT. IN THE SERVICE AGREEMENT MONEY WITHIN THAT EVERY SINGLE IN OUR BUDGET. I'M SORRY I COULDN'T. MAYBE I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE STRUGGLING WITH, AND THAT IS THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THIS WHOLE THING. SO BY LOOKING AT THIS THING FROM THOSE FROM THAT LENS , UM ONE WAY THAT I'VE BEEN ABLE TO LOOK AT THIS WHOLE SCENARIO, EVEN THOUGH THERE'S FOUR SEPARATE ISSUES IS THAT THE MONEY THAT WE ESSENTIALLY GIVE FOR THE SERVICE AGREEMENT. JUST $70,000 FOR ALL ESSENTIAL PURPOSES, AND I KNOW THIS BECAUSE WE STARTED THE ROCK AND RIVERWALK SERIES BACK WHEN IT WAS THE JAZZ SERIES. IT WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY 65 TO $70,000 TO PRODUCE JUST THAT EVENT ALONE. SO THAT'S A PART OF THE DELIVERY HERBAL THAT COMES WITH THAT LICENSE AGREEMENT ITSELF. SO. THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COULD ESSENTIALLY DO THAT, OR WE COULD ACTUALLY SUBCONTRACT THAT OUT, AND THAT SAVING ON STAFF RESOURCES. SAME THING IS TRUE. LOOKING AT THE FLAGLER CENTER WHEN THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME RAN THAT COST THE CITY ABOUT $400,000. AND THEN WHEN WE HAD THE GREAT RECESSION, WE FELT IT WISE AT THAT POINT IN TIME WHERE WE WERE BEING FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE. TO DOWNSIZE THAT BRING THINGS TO 10TH STREET AND THEN OFFER THAT UP FOR A LIFE OR A LEASE RIGHT? AND THAT'S THAT'S MY THOUGHT PROCESSES NOW. WHAT WOULD THE MARKET RATE BE FOR FLAGLER CENTER SO THAT PART OF THE CONVERSATION OF POTENTIALLY RENEGOTIATING THIS AT THIS POINT IS THE CITY IS IT IS. UM ON THE HOOK FOR $1500 A MONTH. WE HAVE LESS THAN MARKET RATE RUN ON FLAGLER CENTER. WHAT IS THE CURRENT RENT? AT WHAT WE HAD 27 50 20 100 BUCKS A MONTH FOR I THINK IT WAS 3% ESCALATED FROM 2,527,000. NO, NO. 272,700 THOSE COMMISSIONER COLLEGE. JUST STEP IN REAL QUICK. JUST KEEP IN MIND THAT OF FIRST THE FLAG WERE CENTER GOATS. WE ALSO HAVE ACCESS TO IT. WE HAVE SO MANY SO MANY DAYS, AND SO THAT'S TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION AND THEY'RE PROVIDING THE SERVICE. UH THAT WE'RE EVEN THOUGH IT MAY NOT BE A FULL MARKET RATE. MHM RELEASED IT TO A PRIVATE COMPANY. WE WOULD LOSE POTENTIALLY LOSE THOSE DAYS AND, UH INCLUDE DID NOT INCLUDE THAT AS PART OF OUR LEASE. PARDON IF WE DID NOT INCLUDE THAT AS PART OF OUR LEGAL RIGHT, BUT DEPENDING WHAT THEIR USE WAS, THEY MIGHT NOT. IT MIGHT NOT WORK BUT ALSO, UM THE IT THERE, MEETING. SOME OF THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS THAT THAT WAS PROVIDING BY MEETING SPACE. FOR THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT GROUPS THAT MEET THEIR THERE'S A BUSINESS GROUP. THERE'S A POLITICAL PARTY THAT MEETS THEIR THERE'S BEEN CHURCHES THAT HAVE HAD SERVICE THERE. SO THERE IS A THERE IS THAT ASPECT AS WELL. SO JUST TO KIND OF CATCH UP ON SOME OF THE HISTORY OF SO WHAT? THE CITY UH, BASICALLY BEING OUT THE 5800 MONTH, 70 K A YEAR PLUS A LESSON MARKET RATE RENT AND LOSING THE REVENUE FROM THE GREEN MARKET. MY THOUGHT PROCESS WOULD BE GOING FORWARD, RIGHT? THERE'S THESE DIFFERENT MOVING PARTS, SO IT'S KIND OF HARD TO PACK THIS ALL TOGETHER. WE DO A LOT FOR THE COMMUNITY. IT COULD BE HARD TO WRAP YOUR ARMS AROUND ALL OF THAT TO DISCREDIT WHAT YOU'RE DOING FOR THE COMMUNITY.

BUT MY HOPE WOULD BE THAT. MAIN STREET IS. LET ME ASK YOU WHAT YOU MEANT ABOUT LOST REVENUE FROM THE MARKET? YES. WHAT DID THAT COMMENT MEAN? WHAT DO YOU LOSING FROM THE MARKET GETTING THE REST, NOT RUNNING IT OURSELVES. I ASSUME. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? OKAY WELL, YOU COULD DO THE PERFORMANCE. YOU COULD ACTUALLY RUN THE NUMBERS AND BUT I MEAN, THAT'S WHY THESE AGREEMENTS EXIST GOING BACK TO MR KOWALSKI'S POINT OF ACTUALLY SAVING THE CITY MONEY BY OUTSOURCING AND CONTRACTING. ACTUALLY DO DON'T TAKE THIS THE WRONG WAY. I APPRECIATE THAT. WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A HIGHER SO I THINK IT'S GOOD BUT GOING FORWARD THAT THE REVENUE THAT YOU COULD GENERATE WITH FLAGLER CENTER BY SUB LEASING IT RIGHT. MHM BY HOSTING EVENTS. THAT THE

[01:55:01]

CITY SHOULD EITHER BE ABLE TO LOOK AT. LET ME FINISH SHOULD EITHER BE ABLE TO LOOK AT INCREASING THE RENT THERE TO WHERE IT'S CLOSER TO MARKET RATE. AND OR BEING ABLE TO CUT THE UMBILICAL CORD ON 70 K A YEAR. BECAUSE IF WE ARE PAYING YOU 70 K AND THEN THE RENT FOR OUR SPACE. IS 2700. PLEASE DON'T TAKE THIS WRONG BECAUSE THERE'S VERY RUDE FOR ME TO SAY, BUT AT SOME POINT IT FEELS LIKE YOU ARE THE ADULT CHILD LIVING AT HOME. THAT IS NOT ABLE TO GROW UP AND BE YOUR OWN. I KNOW THAT'S REALLY RUDE, BUT I WANT TO SEE THE CITY FURTHER DISCONNECTED FROM MAIN STREET TO WHERE WE'RE NOT CONTINUING TO HAVE TO SUPPORT THAT WITH EITHER THE LESSON MARKET RATE RENT THAT YOU HAVE FOR FLAGLER CENTER. HANG THE REVENUE FROM THE GREENMARKET THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO SUSTAIN ON YOUR OWN AND BE FUNCTIONAL INSTEAD OF SORT OF THIS AWKWARD HYBRID, UM RELATIONSHIP AND AGAIN THIS IS NOTHING AGAINST WHAT YOU PROVIDE FOR THE CITY BECAUSE THAT'S WHY YOU'RE HERE. BUT IN TERMS OF NEGOTIATING THIS DEAL, WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS THAT WE EITHER GET THIS RATE CLOSER TO MARKET RATE ON WHAT? FLAGLER CENTER BECAUSE THIS IS THE TIME TO RENEGOTIATE. WE POTENTIALLY WON'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO THIS FOR THREE YEARS, AND THAT 70 K IS ANOTHER CONVERSATION AND A YEAR FROM NOW OR WHENEVER. BUT THAT WE EITHER BRING THIS CLOSER TO MARKET RATE OR UM POTENTIALLY DECREASE THE TERM ON THIS TO WHERE IT LOOKS MORE LIKE THE 70 K AND WERE ABLE TO READ THIS, YOU KNOW, DISCUSS WITH MORE CLARITY INSTEAD OF THESE, UM, THIS SITS IN THREE YEARS AND THIS HITS IN A YEAR SORT OF OVERALL. WHAT IS MAIN STREETS RELATIONSHIP WITH STUART FINANCIALLY INSTEAD OF THIS KIND OF NEBULOUS, IT'S ALL OVER THE PLACE THING. SO I KNOW THAT'S A LOT. BUT THAT'S WHAT I WOULD PERSONALLY LIKE TO SEE IS, UM EITHER. WE'RE GETTING CLOSER TO MARKET RATE, WHICH I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY HOW YOU DETAIL WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. BUT, UM I MAY HAVE A SOLUTION, PLEASE. SO IF I IF I'M A COMMENTS IF I MAKE ONE SECOND, LIKE, JUST MAKE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS UM SO. I KNOW. THE FEW YEARS AGO, THE CITY WAS VOTING TO, UM, START WORKING ON SEPARATING THE CITY FROM MAIN STREET FINANCIALLY. I WAS NOT HERE AT THE TIME. I WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED FOR THAT. RIGHT UM, SO MAIN STREET. AND MAIN STREET PROGRAMS AND MUNICIPALITIES ARE CR RAISE OUR HAVE A SYMBIOTIC LINKED RELATIONSHIP. THEY PROVIDE THE REASON WHY IN MY BELIEF, UM, THAT WE PROVIDE THEM , UH, A PAYMENT. UM UH, A YEAR EVERY YEAR IS TO PROVIDE SO THEY CAN PROVIDE CERTAIN SERVICES TO OUR COMMUNITY SERVICES THAT AT THE PUBLIC WANTS, FOR EXAMPLE, ROCKING RIVER ROCK, AND IF YOU CALM DOWN TO DOWNTOWN STUART ON A SUNDAY AND I'M NOT A BIG MUSIC GUY, BUT I COME DOWN THERE EVERY SO OFTEN AND THE PLACE IS PACKED AND THEY END IT. UM AMAZES ME HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE OUT THERE IN THE HOT SUN. UH, EVERY SUNDAY WATCHING MUSIC. THE UH THE GREENMARKET, UM. WE WENT THROUGH THIS VERY DIFFICULT AND ACTUALLY A LITTLE BIT PAINFUL EFFORT OF WRESTLING THE GREENMARKET AWAY FROM THE PREVIOUS PROVIDER AND NOW, ULTIMATELY AWARDING IT TO STUART MAIN STREET, PROVIDING A SERVICE WHICH IS BELOVED BY THE COMMUNITY. I LOVE GOING DOWN TO THE GREENMARKET AND MY WIFE DOES, AND FAMILIES DO. SO WE HAVE THAT AS WELL. SO I THINK THAT THERE'S A WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THEN WE LET'S GET TO THE ISSUE ON POINT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE ISSUE ON POINT, WHICH IS THE FLAGLER CENTER ITSELF.

REGULAR CENTER FOR MANY YEARS UP UNTIL I BELIEVE 2010 IT WAS A COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER. UM, THERE WAS AND IT WAS AND POOR CONDITION. IT WAS NOT REALLY THAT WELL UP, KEPT UP. SORRY TO SORRY TO SAY HE, UM IT WASN'T PRODUCING MUCH FACT. I REMEMBER AT ONE POINT WE MY FAMILY RENTED A ROOM THERE. AND IT WAS A LOT OF MONEY FOR NOT A ROOM THAT WAS ACTUALLY FAIRLY DIRTY. UM WE AND THEN FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, UM THE LYRIC TOOK IT OVER FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS AND OPERATED AND THEY RAN CAMPS AND IN BLACK BOX AND SOME OTHER THINGS, AND THEN THAT WENT AWAY.

THEN WE DID GO TO A PRIVATE VENDOR WHO, UM PAID WHO PAID US FOR SEVERAL YEARS TO OPERATE IT AND WHAT I HEARD FROM HER WAS THE ELECTRIC BILL IS $6000 A MONTH OR $4000 A MONTH.

[02:00:09]

SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BECAUSE OF THE HIGH CEILINGS AND THE AND THE 12 DIFFERENT AIR CONDITIONERS THAT IT TAKES TO OPERATE IT, UM THE THEN WE FINALLY AT AGAIN WHILE I WASN'T HERE, THERE WAS A DECISION MADE TO RELEASE IT TO MAIN STREET. UM WASN'T SURE TO BE HONEST, I WASN'T SURE IF IT WAS A GOOD IDEA. IT WAS A BAD IDEA AT THE TIME I WAS BECAUSE I WASN'T INVOLVED IN IT. BUT THERE IS A VALUE THAT THEY ARE BRINGING TO THE COMMUNITY. IN ADDITION TO BE IN A BAND YOU OCCASIONAL VENUE FOR WEDDINGS AND BIRTHDAYS AND OTHER THINGS, BUT COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, NOT FOR PROFITS, I THINK WHAT IS IT TAKES FOR TEENS. THE TREES ARE THERE NOW ARE GETTING SET UP, AND THAT'S ALWAYS A FUN EVENT. UM THERE'S A BUSINESS THE MARTIN COUNTY BUSINESS EXCHANGE IS THERE. THERE'S THAT IT MEETS THEIR THERE'S NUMEROUS ORGANIZATIONS THAT MEET THERE THAT, UH, THAT IF WE PUT IT INTO 100% PRIVATE HANDS. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IT WOULD BE. IT MIGHT BECOME A CORPORATE OFFICE. IT MIGHT BECAUSE IT MIGHT NOT BE A VENUE.

UM BUT WE COULD AS PART OF OUR LEAST HAVE STIPULATIONS THAT ARE SIMILAR COULD BUT AGAIN, IT'S GOING TO RAISE THE COST FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY TO USE IT. AND WHEN YOU RACE WHEN, WHEN YOU CAUSE FEES TO GO UP, THAT'S TO ME THAT'S EQUIVALENT TO A TAX INCREASE AND AGAIN. MAIN STREET IS NOT A IS NOT AS A NOT FOR PROFIT THAT IS SYMBIOTIC. PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY, AND THAT'S AND THAT'S REALLY HALF HOW WE HAVE TO LOOK AT IT. MAIN STREET IS THERE OR, UH, AS YOU KNOW, AS PROMOTION FOR THE FOR THE CITY AND DO AND THEY'RE DOING THINGS THAT WE JUST CAN'T DO. IT'S JUST INEFFICIENT THAT THEY HAVE VOLUNTEERS. THEY'RE NOT HIRING PEOPLE WERE ANYTHING WE WOULD DO WERE YOU KNOW WE'D HAVE PAYROLL? I THINK BACK IN 2000 IN 2010 WHEN THEY GAVE IT TO THE WHEN WE GAVE IT TO THE LYRIC. IT WAS $400,000 A YEAR FOR STAFF TO KEEP IT OPERATED WITH OUR PAYROLL BY THE TIME WE PAY THE STAFF AND MAINTENANCE STAFF AND BENEFITS AND. AND RETIREMENT FOR EVERYBODY. SO I PARDON TAKEN OVER THE GREEN LINE. AND THE YEAH, THE GREENMARKET. ABSOLUTELY AND I THINK THE GREEN MARKET IS MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN EVER. AND ACTUALLY, WE'RE GETTING MONEY WHERE WE NEVER GOT ANYTHING BEFORE. IT WAS JUST NOTHING.

IT'S JUST THEY TOOK UP SPACE AND COMPLAINT, SO I THINK THAT I THINK THAT GIVING THE MAIN STREET A THREE YEAR EXTENSION EXTENDING THE AGREEMENT. IS THIS THE THING TO DO AND IF, AND I DON'T KNOW IF I TALKED TO STAFF ABOUT THIS IN THE PAST AND I DON'T THINK IT'S THEY DON'T THINK IT'S THE BEST WAY TO GO. BUT MAYBE THERE IS A WAY TO LOCK ALL THESE AGREEMENTS AT THE SAME TIME, SO WE CAN SO THAT WE CAN, SINCE THEY ARE INTERLOCKED, BUT , UM, BUT I DO THINK THAT THIS IS THIS IS IMPORTANT, AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE APPROVED THE LEAST. SO. AGAIN NOT TO DISCREDIT ANYTHING YOU'RE DOING. MY POINT IS JUST THAT. INITIALLY WE HAD A MUCH LOWER LOWER THAN MARKET RATE. TO GET HER STARTED AND EVEN FORGAVE HER FOR THOSE SIX MONTHS AND THEN WITH COVID. IS THERE, NOT A SENSE THAT WE SHOULD EVER BRING THAT CLOSER TO MARKET. WHAT WE SHOULD HAVE. WHAT SERVICE DID WE HAVE THEM CUT TO THE CITY? REMEMBER, THEY'RE NOT A PRIVATE BUSINESS. THAT SERVICE AGREEMENT IS TIED TO SUCH THINGS AS PUTTING ON THE CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING EVENT, WHICH YOU'RE ALL INVITED. DON'T FORGET. THE DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING. I EXPECT YOU TO BE THERE. YES. FLIP THAT. SWITCH YOUR LIGHTING THE TREE CHILDREN LOVE IT. NOT ONLY ARE OUR COMMUNITY EVENTS THAT WE DO FOR THE CITY, BUT THERE ALSO COMES A LOT MORE TO THAT, UM, WE ACT AS A VOICE FOR THE RESIDENTS AND THE BUSINESS OWNERS IN DOWNTOWN. AND WE TAKE POSITIONS ON THINGS WHEN WE NEED TO. WE OFFER DESIGN SERVICES. I THINK THERE'S A CONFUSION HERE.

CONFLATION OF YOUR WORTH TO THE COMMUNITY AND WHAT I'M SAYING. WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT MY UNDERSTANDING IS INITIALLY THAT THE RATE AND THE 70 K WAS TO GET THINGS GOING WAS TO GET THINGS STARTED THAT AND NOW IT SEEMS LIKE THE ARGUMENT IS MAIN STREET VALUABLE TO THE COMMUNITY? AND I KNOW YOU ARE EVERY MAIN STREET PROGRAM ACROSS THE COUNTRY, AND I'D BE HAPPY THAT YOU SHOULD JOIN ME ON MY NEXT CONVENTION. IT'S ONLY A TWO. YOU AGREE WITH THAT, OR NO. ARE YOU ARE WE NOT ON THE SAME PAGE WITH THAT? THAT THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL BEFORE ME. THAT THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL ATTEMPT INTENT THAT I NEGOTIATED WITH THE PREVIOUS PRESIDENT OF THE OF THE BOARD, AND IT WAS,

[02:05:04]

TOO. AT THAT TIME THE CITY HAD THE EMPLOYEE. IT WAS OUR EMPLOYEE THAT WAS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, UM, THAT EMPLOYEE, UM RESIGNED, AND AS A RESULT, I WANTED TO GET THAT FTE FULL TIME EMPLOYEE POSITION OFF OF OUR BOOKS. AND WE AGREED TO THANK YOU AGREED TO FUND UM, FOR THREE YEAR TERM THIS $70,000 SERVICE AGREEMENT AND ALSO AT THE TIME TRY TO GIVE OPPORTUNITY FOR REVENUE ENHANCEMENT TO MAIN STREET, WHICH IS WHY WE ENTERED INTO THE LEASE AND WHICH IS WHY WE ENTERED INTO THE MARKET ON MAIN. AND IT HAS NOT. DEPRECIATED AT ALL. YET. I HAVE HAD TALKS WITH THE CURRENT, UM PRESIDENT ABOUT A DEPRECIATION, WHETHER THAT'S 50,000 OR WHATEVER IT MAY BE TO TRY TO LOWER THAT SERVICE AGREEMENT. OBLIGATION FROM US. I KNOW CANVASES STANCE. I UNDERSTAND THE NEED FOR REVENUE AND TO KEEP THE ORGANIZATION ALIVE. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THE COST OF WHAT IT COSTS TO DO ROCK AND RIVER WALK. UM BUT WE WERE DOING ROCK AND RIVERWALK PRIOR WHEN IT WAS OUR OWN STAFF MEMBER, AND WE WEREN'T GIVEN THE 70,000 AS WELL, UM, IT IT ALL OF THAT THAT THEY DO, AND ALL OF IT THAT GOES ON IS VIABLE TO DOWNTOWN. OF COURSE, PRIOR PRIOR TO THE WALKING RIVERWALK, IT WAS A GHOST TOWN IN DOWNTOWN . ALL THE STORES WERE CLOSED, SO IT'S DEFINITELY IMPROVED. AND I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU PUT A DOLLAR FIGURE ON THAT. BUT THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS TO WEAN OFF AS WE PROVIDED OPPORTUNITIES FOR REVENUE GROWTH, I HOPE IS IF WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE THIS, WHICH IT FEELS LIKE THAT'S SORT OF THE CONSENSUS HERE THAT WE REALLY REALLY SERIOUSLY LOOK AT COMING OFF OF THAT 70 K SO IT CAN BE MORE ABOUT AUTONOMOUS INSTEAD OF RIGHT. IF I MAY. MIKE MCCARTNEY, ALSO THE STUART MAIN STREET. ON THE DESIGN COMMITTEE CHAIR. UM, LAND PLANNER HERE IN TOWN, AS YOU ALL KNOW. UM, BEEN INVOLVED WITH MAIN STREET FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS NOW. THERE'S COUNTLESS. VOLUNTEERS AND THE COMMUNITY LIKE MYSELF, SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS, WE SPEND A TON OF TIME HUNDREDS OF HOURS THOUSANDS OF HOURS AMONGST ALL OF US TO TRY TO GIVE BACK TO THE CITY. RIGHT. AND, YES, WE HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO HELP BRING UM. PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE FLAGLER CENTER RIGHT FOR EVENTS, UM, AT AN AFFORDABLE RATE. IF YOU TAKE THAT INTO, YOU KNOW, PRIVATE IF YOU SHIFT THAT INTO A PRIVATE SECTOR MODEL AND YOU LEASE OUT THAT BUILDING. I MEAN IT BECOME AN OFFICE BUILDING, AND THERE'S NO PUBLIC ACCESS IN THE IN THE PUBLIC BENEFIT DIMINISHES. CORRECT? YES. WHAT WHAT MAINSTREAM HAS DONE IS WE HAVE TAKEN ON MORE AND MORE. OVER THE YEARS AS DELIVERABLES TO THE CITY AND THAT IS THAT REQUIRES MORE OF OUR VOLUNTEERS THAT REQUIRED US TO HIRE A DIRECTOR. AS YOU INDICATED. WE'VE TAKEN UH , THAT INITIATIVE. WE'VE ALSO TAKEN ON THE GREEN MARKET THAT WAS ASKED OF US TO PURSUE THAT, AND SO BUT ULTIMATELY WE'RE NOT PROFITING. IT'S NOT LIKE WE'RE HA HA HA. WE'RE MAKING MONEY.

THIS ISN'T THIS IS A NON FOR PROFIT WHAT WE MAKE AND WHAT THE BENEFITS WE PROVIDE TO THE COMMUNITY GOES RIGHT BACK INTO THE CITY INTO THEIR DOWNTOWN. INTO PROVIDING EVENTS. UM LOTS OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR YOUTH FOR ALL OF OUR CITIZENS TO COME AND UTILIZE THE DOWNTOWN PARK PROMOTE OUR DOWNTOWN JUST SOME NOTEWORTHY ITEMS AS DESIGN COMMITTEE CHAIR WERE INSTRUMENTAL, UM IN THE SEMINAL STREET REDESIGN. WE WORKED WITH THE SIERRA AND NOW WE PROVIDED SOME SOME DESIGN. UM CRITIQUING ON THAT, UM, THE GREEN BICYCLE RACK THAT YOU SEE IN DOWNTOWN. I DONATED THAT TO THE CITY DESIGN THROUGH MAIN STREET, SO THERE'S LOTS AND LOTS OF THINGS THAT MAIN STREET DOES. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE A BUSINESSMAN. YOU OWN YOUR OWN PRACTICE, AND THEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT FROM A BUSINESS STANDPOINT OF DOLLARS AND CENTS REVENUES I UNDERSTAND THAT PERSPECTIVE, HOWEVER, THERE'S A LARGER BENEFIT HERE. AND HOW DO YOU PUT A PRICE TAG ON SOME OF THAT SOME OF ITS PRICELESS. ANYWAYS, WE HAD THESE MULTIPLE AGREEMENTS IN PLACE. YES, AND THEY HAVE COME ON AS MAIN STREET HAS EVOLVED, AND THE CITY HAS ASKED MORE OF US, WHICH WE'RE DOING WHAT WE CAN TO TRY TO EXPAND OUR FOOTPRINT IN OUR OUTREACH IN DOWNTOWN, RIGHT, SO, COMMISSIONER COLLINS COULD I JUST CORRECT STATEMENT YOU SAID YOU WERE ASKED TO TAKE ON THE GREEN MARKET. WELL, NO, ACTUALLY. ENGAGED IN AN RFP,

[02:10:02]

RIGHT AND ONE THAT WE, AS A BOARD DECIDED THAT YOU CHOSE TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL. THAT'S CORRECT. WE DID NOT. YOU'RE NOT ASKED. AND IF YOU PLEASE BE RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIR OKAY.

COMMISSIONER COLLEGE, THE CITY GET ANY SORT OF NO, WE GET A CUT OF THE GREENMARKET. DO WE GET A CUT OF LIKE EVENTS THAT ARE HOSTED AT FLAGLER CENTER? NO, NOT TOO FLAT LEAF, RIGHT? OKAY.

I THINK WHAT WOULD HELP ME FLAT LEASE RATE, JUST THE MONTHLY RELEASE RATE. I THINK THAT WOULD HELP ME IS DO YOU GUYS HAVE A FORM 9 90 FOR 21. YOUR TREASURER COULD SEND HAVE. TO IT'S PUBLIC . IT'S PUBLIC RECORD. COULD YOU GUYS SEND YOU SUBMITTED AT THE END OF THE YEAR TO COMPLY WITH THE LICENSING? COULD YOU SEND A COPY OF THAT? I HAVE IT. I'LL GET IT TO YOU. THANK YOU. UM DO WE HAVE A MOTION OR YOU WOULD JUST GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT. COULD I ASK SOME QUESTIONS THROUGH HIM? YOU HAVEN'T ASKED SO DO DO WE RECEIVE A PIANO FROM THEM? EVERY YEAR, MR DAVIS. YEAH WHAT WAS THE MONTH? I JUST BECAUSE I THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT. YES AT THE END OF THE YEAR, WE HAVE, UM , FOR LET'S BE CLEAR ON THE SERVICE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE WITH STUART MAIN STREET. ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT YOU JUST ASKED FOR IS ALL COMPILED INTO ONE REPORT. I'VE GOTTEN THAT BY THE END, IT NEEDS TO BE BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. AND THEN I TAKE THAT INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY MANAGER, SO WE DO HAVE THAT ON RECORD. THE FORM 9 90 IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS YOU WANT THAT SOMEONE RAN A 51 C THREE FOR 30 YEARS. WILL HELP YOU WANT THE PIANO AND CERTAINLY IF WE'RE GIVING THESE PEOPLE THIS MONEY, WE WANT TO SEE THE P AND L. I KNOW. THE ONLY TIME I'VE SEEN THEIR FIGURES CAME FROM SOMEONE WHO JUST HAPPENS TO LIVE IN THE CITY. AND. COMMISSIONER COLLEGE . I APPRECIATE YOU. YOU'RE STRUGGLING WITH THIS. AND THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU AND I, AS NEW COMMISSIONERS SHOULD BE ASKING. AND WHAT ARE WE GETTING FOR THE MONEY AND WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THIS ORGANIZATION? BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF OUR BIGGER COMMITMENTS. UM AND. MAYOR MCDONALD. I THOUGHT YOU HAD A VERY GOOD IDEA THAT WE SHOULD TRY TO BUNDLE IT ALL THE DIFFERENT ELEMENTS AT ONE TIME CAN ADDRESS THAT REALLY QUICK. I DON'T KNOW THAT'S A GREAT IDEA, BECAUSE THESE ARE SEPARATE PIECES OF PROPERTY IS AN ACTUAL PHYSICAL LEGAL LEASE. THE OTHER TWO ARE LICENSE AGREEMENTS FOR SEPARATE PARCELS AND SEPARATE TYPES OF EVENTS. AND THEN YOU HAVE THE SERVICES.

IT IS DIFFICULT, DIFFICULT TO GET YOUR HANDS ON A LAND AT THE SAME TIME SO WE CAN DISCUSS AND WE ARE DOING THAT WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE THEM ALL LINE UP. WE WOULD LOVE I WOULD LOVE TO MAKE THEM ALL INTO ONE AGREEMENT BECAUSE IT'S ADMINISTRATIVELY VERY TAXING TO KEEP TRACK OF FOUR PLATES NEAR SPINNING IN DIFFERENT SO, COMMISSIONER COUNT MAKES A VERY GOOD POINT. ARE WE MAXIMIZING THE BENEFIT TO THE CITY? I'D LIKE TO DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO SOME LANGUAGE ADDED TO I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S NINE OR 10 ADOPTION OF FISCAL POLICY. AND IT SAYS THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES SHOULD BE USED DEPENDING ON THE AMOUNT OF THE PURCHASE. THIS IS ON PAGE 75 OF 672. HE ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PURCHASE DETERMINES WHAT STEPS MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION CAN BE ISSUED FOR THE REQUEST. IF THE PURCHASE PRICE OF COMMODITIES OR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES. AND I'M GOING TO CLASSIFY THESE AS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES. EXCEEDS THE THRESHOLD AMOUNT. PROVIDED IN SECTION 284. OF 35,000. PURCHASE OF COMMODITIES.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT RECEIVING COMPETITIVE SEALED BITS.

COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSALS OR COMPETITIVE SEALED, REPLIES. I WHY DOESN'T THAT APPLY HERE? WHY DON'T WE ASK? THIS FIVE OH ONE C THREE, WHICH HAS HAD SOME SERIOUS CHANGES AND WHO'S INVOLVED IN WHO RUNS IT RECENTLY. WHY JUST LIKE THE GREENMARKET? THAT'S WHY I CORRECTED GENTLEMAN. WHY DON'T WE ASK THEM FOR AN RFP? AND NOW WOULD WHY DON'T WE ASK OR PUT OUT AN RFP TO LEASE THE FLAGLER CENTER. WE DID. THAT WAS THE ENVIRONMENT. WE DID FOR THIS.

THE ORIGINAL RFP. WAS PUT OUT AND THE ISLAND PARTY PRODUCTIONS. REYNOLDS WAS THE ONE THAT ADOPTED IT. AND THEN THIS PROCEDURE WAS A TRANSITION BECAUSE UNDER THE STATE STATUTE AS WELL, SPEAK INTO YOUR MICROPHONE UNDER STATE LAW, AS WELL AS THE MUNICIPALITIES HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER INTO DIRECT LEASE AGREEMENTS WITHOUT OUR FPS AND THE COMMISSION AT THE TIME

[02:15:04]

USED THE VALUE SET FORTH IN THE RFP. AND THE DESIRE TO I GUESS KIND OF BUNDLE AS YOUR OLD IS THAT R P WAS THAT 18 17. OKAY SIX YEARS AGO. YEAH. WHAT I'M TRYING TO THINK BEFORE THAT WAS, MAYBE IT WAS 62 TERMS. OKAY SO SIX YEARS OLD, LET'S WRITE. IT COULD BE DONE AGAIN. OBVIOUSLY I DON'T THINK IT'S UNREASONABLE TO ASK THIS ORGANIZATION. THAT WE HAVE SUCH A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH AND WE PROVIDE FUNDING. FOR VALUE. TWO. YOU KNOW, I SUBMIT TO THE RFP PRICES PROCESS JUST LIKE THEY DID BEFORE, AND JUST LIKE THEY DID FOR THE GREEN MARKET. IT SATISFIES COMMISSIONER COLLINS CONCERNS AND IT'S YOU KNOW, THE CITIZENS OF THE STEWARD CAN SAY, WELL, THEY'RE TRYING TO DO THE BEST THEY CAN FOR THE FLAG GO CENTER FOR DOWNTOWN AND FOR THE TAXPAYERS. SO TO THE MOTION. I JUST WANTED TO ADD AND CORRECT THAT FOR THE RECORD THAT THAT WAS DONE IN 14 2008 YEARS AGO, WELL, WHICH IS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN I RECALLED EVEN MORE REASON. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PROCUREMENT POLICY AND YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LEASE IS REALLY IT'S TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT I'M SAYING THAT THAT THRESHOLD I UNDERSTAND. I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES. ANYTHING WRONG. WHY WHY ARE WE SAYING OH, WELL, NOT IN THIS INSTANCE AND FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. THE OTHER THING IS WHEN THE RFP DID GO OUT IN 2014. IT WAS AN OPEN RFP. SO ONE PERSON BID ON IT TO BE AN ART STUDIO ISLAND PARTY. REYNOLDS BID ON IT TO KIND OF DO KIND OF WHAT THE STUART MAIN STREET EVENTS ARE GOING TO DO. SO IF THE COMMISSION WERE TO GO TO RFP, YOU WOULD IF YOU WANTED IT , YOU NEED TO AGENDA ITEM TO DESCRIBE WHAT YOU WANT TO BE.

COULD IT BE TOTAL PRIVATE USE COULD BE. COULD SOMEONE OPEN UP OFFICE THERE? YOU KNOW WHAT, EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE MAINTAINING OUR CITY DAYS IS IMPORTANT. OKAY THEN WE'RE FINE. I'M JUST POINTING OUT THAT THAT WAS THE RP WITH SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT. I'M SORRY. I'M JUST YOU KNOW, I GET THAT THIS HAS BEEN. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS OVER THE YEARS AND WE CAN WE COURSE WE CAN GO TO OUR P, THEN WE MIGHT AS WELL GO TO R P FOR THE FEED STORE AND EVERY OTHER NOT FOR PROFIT THAT WE SUPPORT AND, UH I MEAN, I I'M JUST KIND OF SHOCKED BY THIS, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? I'LL TELL YOU WHAT? I'M GONNA GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT BECAUSE I'VE GOT THE PUBLIC RARIN TO GO. UM GO WITH ANDY MCMILLAN. AND I DON'T HAVE A GREEN CARD FOR YOU. BUT I'M GONNA LET YOU GO FIRST, BECAUSE YOU'RE STANDING AT THE PODIUM. YOU DON'T TRY. I THINK I HAVE YOUR PERSONAL PERMISSION TO BE HERE AT THE MOMENT BECAUSE I CAN'T LET THIS GO BY WITH WITHOUT COMMENTING THAT ORIGINALLY IT WAS THE CITY OF STEWART THAT WENT TO THE MERCHANTS DOWNTOWN IN 1983. I WAS A PART OF THAT, AND I'VE KNOWN EVERY SINGLE MAIN STREET MANAGER AND YOU'VE GOT ONE OF THE VERY BEST. RIGHT HERE. SHE'S DOING A MARVELOUS JOB FOR YOU.

THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE CITY AND STEWART. MAIN STREET IS LEGENDARY. I AM NOT BUT THE PROGRAM IS LEGENDARY, AND THIS CITY SHOULD HOLD ITS HEAD HIGH THAT YOU HAVE ALWAYS REMAINED A PARTNER TO THIS WONDERFUL PROGRAM THAT BRINGS SO MUCH TO THIS COMMUNITY AND TO THE CITIZENS AND THAT'S WHAT I HAD TO SAY. SO THANK YOU FOR CONTINUING TO SUPPORT OUR STEWART MAIN STREET. THANK YOU AND ANNIE, COULD YOU FILL OUT A GREEN CARD FOR US? A GREEN CARD . PUBLIC RECORDS CHEATS. OKAY I WILL. THANK YOU GET SOMETHING. SO THE NEXT THE NEXT PERSON IS THERE SOME MARK, HOLD ON FOR A SECOND LITTLE GREEN CARD HERE. OKAY OKAY. KATIE CRUISE. HI THERE. UM I RUN THE OAKS, WHICH IS A RELATIVELY NEW SCHOOL IN TOWN. I HAVE SPOKEN TO A COUPLE OF YOU ABOUT IT. UM I WE ARE BECOMING ESTABLISHED. WE HAVE A SPACE IN DOWNTOWN STUART. AND IT'S BEEN WONDERFUL. WE'RE DOING REALLY WELL AND WE LOVE IT THERE, BUT WE ARE GROWING, SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR MORE SPACE. SO I ORIGINALLY CAME HERE TO SAY, HEY, CAN YOU OPEN IT UP FOR THE FLAGLER CENTER FOR? OTHER PROPOSALS JUST TO SEE WHAT THE HIGHEST INVEST USES. I HAVE TO SAY THAT THEY DO A FANTASTIC JOB AS A FELLOW NONPROFIT. I TOTALLY FEEL FOR THEM. SO REALLY, MY MESSAGE TO YOU GUYS IS JUST PLEASE DO CAN CONTINUE TO CONSIDER NOT JUST THE MARKET RATE. I THINK YOU SHOULD ALSO CONSIDER WHAT'S BEING DONE IN THAT SPACE. SO MY ONLY QUESTION WOULD BE COULD ALL THOSE WONDERFUL THINGS THAT THEY DO BE DONE. FROM ANOTHER SPACE. I DON'T KNOW, REGARDLESS OF PLEASE CONSIDER TO CONTINUE TO CONSIDER THE NONPROFITS, SCHOOLS ALL THE THINGS THAT DO MAKE STEWART SUCH A SPECIAL PLACE AS YOU DO, YOU KNOW, NOT JUST FLAGLER CENTER,

[02:20:03]

BUT, UM, YOU KNOW, LAND, LAND PLANNING AND ZONING AND ALL THAT YOU GUYS DO SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO FLOURISH AND TO GROW BECAUSE OTHERWISE WE REALLY CAN'T COMPETE WITH THE BIG DOLLARS THAT ARE COMING IN AND COULD OTHERWISE BY THAT SPACE OR THAT SPACE, SO THANK YOU. SHERRY WHITE. SHERIFF. IN THE PAST. OKAY. TOM WELLINGTON. I FIGURED YOU'D BE ON THE NEXT ITEM. I HOPE I WILL BE MR MAYOR COMMISSIONER'S STAFF. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AS PART OF ANOTHER SMALL, NONPROFIT MARINE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, THE TREASURE COAST . I WANT TO JUST SAY THAT I APPRECIATE CITIES OF SUPPORT OF NONPROFITS AS YOU SUPPORT OUR ASSOCIATION. THERE'S PROBABLY ABOUT SIX OR SEVEN YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ABOUT I'VE HAD WITH THE FLAGGERS CENTER. MAYBE THEY BELONG TO MY WIFE IS RIGHT THERE NOW AT THE JOY TO THE GIRLS FOR TYKES AND TEENS, THEIR LARGEST FUNDRAISER OF THE YEAR. THE REASON I'M STANDING UP HERE IS I WALKED AROUND THE FLAGLER YESTERDAY. AND I SAID WHAT? WHAT HAPPENED? IT'S DIFFERENT FOLKS. I DON'T KNOW WHO DID IT. I. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS A CITY. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS STUART MAIN STREET. IT'S DIFFERENT, AND I WENT UP TO THE PERSON THERE YESTERDAY AND SAID TO THEM I REALLY APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'VE DONE. AND THIS IS A GREAT HOME, PROBABLY THE ONLY HOME FOR TYKES AND TEENS FOR WHAT THEY DO.

REALLY? IT PROBABLY IS. UM THE ONLY VENUE THAT WOULD WORK FOR THEM AND THEY WERE REALLY WORRIED A FEW YEARS AGO ABOUT COMING BACK, SO I'M JUST TELLING YOU, THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT STEWART MAIN STREET IS ST IS DOING AND I HOPE WE WILL KEEP KEEP SUPPORTING THEM. THANK YOU . THANK YOU, MARK BREAKFAST. I DON'T HAVE YOUR CARD YET, BUT I'M MARK DIDN'T CAN YOU ANSWER A QUESTION FOR ME? DIDN'T DIDN'T YOU GUYS GET A DONOR TO PUT IN ALL THOSE WINDOWS? WE DID? YES.

SO. MARK BRETT BILL TWO. OH, EIGHT, SOUTHEAST AS YOU ALL THE STREET, STUART, FLORIDA AND PAST PRESIDENT OF A GREAT ORGANIZATION. STUART MAIN STREET, BUT I THINK THAT WHAT'S GOING ON HERE IS WE'RE LOSING TRACK OF HOW THE FUNDING IS SUPPOSED TO WORK. WE'RE CHALLENGING ON FAIR MARKET VALUE LEASES AND SERVICE AGREEMENTS. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND MAIN STREETS ARE ALL OVER THE NATION. THEY'RE ALL OVER FLORIDA. OUR OWN. JOAN JEFFERSON WAS HEAD OF THAT WHOLE THING FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND MADE A HUGE DIFFERENCE AROUND THE STATE OF FLORIDA.

MAIN STREETS AREN'T EXPECTED TO SUPPORT THEMSELVES. IT'S A ONE THIRD, ONE THIRD ONE THIRD BASIS. THE CITY PROVIDES A THIRD THE ORGANIZATION PROVIDES A THIRD TYPICALLY IN MEMBERSHIP OR SPONSORSHIPS. AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER THIRD THAT'S TYPICALLY PROVIDED AN EVENTS, UM OR ACTIVITIES THAT THEY'RE RAISING, AND THAT'S BEEN THE CASE HISTORICALLY. AND IF YOU LOOK AT IT THE ONLY TIME THAT WASN'T THE CASE WAS WHEN THE TAX RETURN WAS PREPARED INCORRECTLY. BY THE WAY , I DIDN'T DO IT AND THE PERSON LEFT OFF THE IN KIND CONTRIBUTION OF THE CITY. AND SO THE CITY WASN'T GIVEN CREDIT FOR AN IN KIND CONTRIBUTE. LUCIAN OF ROUGHLY AROUND $70,000. BUT THE ORGANIZATION IS NOT SUPPOSED TO FUND ITSELF. BUT FOR SOME REASON , RATHER WE'VE KIND OF GOT THIS PHILOSOPHY, AND WHAT'S HAPPENED IS IT'S COST YOU AS A CITY A LOT. BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE THINGS THAT YOU'RE NOW DEALING WITH THE FIRST ITEM THAT WAS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT EARLIER.

YOU'RE ALL SURPRISED BY THE CITY BY THE COMMUNITY'S REACTION. WHY? BECAUSE THIS STUFF IS NOT BEING VETTED, AND THAT'S MAIN STREETS. JOB MAIN STREETS. PRIMARY JOB IS TO TAKE ALL THE SLINGS AND ARROWS THAT YOU GUYS DON'T NEED TO TAKE THEIR TO STAND OUT THERE AND DO THE THREATS AND TO DO THE INFORMATION AND TO GATHER PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY WHO ARE IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY TO GET THEIR FEEDBACK. AND THEY'RE NOT DOING THAT NOW BECAUSE THEY'RE SPENDING ALL THEIR TIME TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO SURVIVE BY RUNNING A FLAGLER CENTER AND BY RUNNING A SERVICE AGREEMENT ON AND BY THE WAY THEY LOSE ABOUT $50,000 A YEAR ON WALKING ON ROCK AND RIVERWALK. YES IT DID EXIST BEFORE AS A WEEKEND ONLY FUNCTION. IT WAS NOT AND NOT DURING THE SUMMER. WHEN YOU STARTED DOING THAT PROGRAM DURING THE SUMMER, AND YOU RUN IT EVERY SINGLE SUNDAY AND IT MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE TO DOWNTOWN. BUT THE POINT IS, YOU GOTTA LOOK AT FUNDING. THE CITY'S GOT SOME RESPONSIBILITY ON MAIN STREETS, NOT JUST OUR MAIN STREET. THAT'S HOW IT WORKS . SO YOU KNOW WE SHOULD BE FOCUSING ON ARE WE MAKING A PROFIT, OR ARE WE MAKING WHAT? THAT'S A WHOLE SEPARATE THING? MAIN STREET SHOULD BE FUNDED.

THAT'S THE PROCESS AND THEY SHOULD GET INFORMATION FOR YOU AND BRING IT BACK AND BE THE LIAISON WITH THE COMMUNITY. THAT'S THEIR JOB. THEY'VE DONE IT FOR YEARS, AND THAT'S THEIR

[02:25:01]

JOB. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENT ON THIS ITEM WOULD LIKE TO SAY. MR BROODER? YES. IT'S BEEN ABOUT A LITTLE OVER A YEAR . I BELIEVE THAT THAT CANDICE HAS TAKEN OVER THE FARMER'S MARKET. AND WE HAD SOME PROBLEMS THERE. AND I KNOW AND THEN WE YOU KNOW, WE HAD TO GO THROUGH, UM COVID AND ALL THAT. AND TRYING TO GET OFF THE GROUND WITH THAT. AND THEN AS I'M SETTING, YOU LISTEN TO EVERYONE. WE HIRED SOMEONE UNEMPLOYED E. THAT DID ALL THIS EVEN MORE. SO DO WE WANT TO? UM. WRITE IT UP IS THAT'S WHAT WE DO FOR THE CITY OF STUART. THIS IS WHAT WE DO TO MAKE US THE GREATEST LITTLE CITY AND THE PEOPLE. MISSING OVER THERE THAT CAME BEFORE US THAT A LOT OF KNOWLEDGE. SO UM AND I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU COMING FROM ? BECAUSE I DID THE SAME THING WITH THE MARKET. IT'S LIKE THIS GUY'S GOT TO GO. UM SO WE FEEL LIKE WE'VE GOT GOOD PEOPLE RUNNING IT. UM AND I THINK WE SHOULD CONTINUE AND DO IT A YEAR BY YEAR OR WHATEVER IT TAKES. BECAUSE I KNOW WHEN YOU THINK OF THAT, $70,000 YOU THINK? WOW.

BUT AND THEN WE SIT UP HERE AND LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE AND HOW IT'S ALL COME ABOUT AND HOW IT'S ALL UM MORE IS COMING ABOUT AND TO DO OUR BEST TO MAKE THE TOWN OR LITTLE CITY A GREAT CITY. I'M TOLD TO SAY LITTLE WERE A GREAT CITY. AND THAT'S THE TRUTH. WE'RE GROWING. AND WE ARE STILL A GREAT CITY IN THE MIDDLE OF ALL THAT, SO WE MIGHT HAVE TO UM , KEEP CANDACE THERE, AND THAT'S WHAT IT'S GONNA COST US. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU HAVE A MOTION. OH, YEAH. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? NO, WE DON'T. OKAY. EMOTIONAL APPROVAL, MAN. YES YOUR QUESTION. YES. YES. YOU WANTED TO DO IT YEAR BY YEAR. I THOUGHT THAT'S WHAT WE WERE, OR IS THIS TIME. IT'S FOR THREE YEARS. OKAY THREE YEARS. I APOLOGIZE. IT WAS FOR ONE YEAR, UM, MOVE FOR APPROVAL FOR ONE YEAR. SECOND OKAY, SO WE HAVE AN EMOTION IN A SECOND FOR ONE YEAR. UM, ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THAT. SPECIFIC ISSUES. POLICE TO THE LEAST THE FLAG PLACE THE WAY THAT FOR THE RECORD MARKED BILL THE WAY THAT MAIN STREET IS USING THAT AND THE WAY THAT ANYBODY IS GOING TO USE THAT AS THEIR BOOKING THAT FOR EVENTS WEDDINGS, THINGS LIKE THAT MANY OF THOSE EVENTS ARE GOING TO BE LONGER THAN A YEAR.

SO WHAT YOU'RE BASICALLY DOING IS PUTTING THEM ON A SHORT TERM CONTRACT, WHICH MAKES IT VERY DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO CONTINUE BECAUSE THEY CAN'T BOOK THOSE THOSE LONG TERM WEDDINGS AND EVENTS THAT NEED TO BE BOOKED FOR MAKING THAT COMMENT, AND I WILL WE ALSO WANTED TO MAKE MENTION OF SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD NEED TO RELOOK AT THE AGREEMENT BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT'S STRUCTURED AS A THREE YEAR AGREEMENT, AND WE'RE ONLY ALLOWED TO RENEW THAT ONE ADDITIONAL TIME. SO I WILL GO BACK TO MY THREE TO THE THREE YEARS. OKAY, SO YOU'RE MODIFYING YOUR MOTION TO THREE YEARS. COMMISSIONER COLLINS THE SECOND YOU MODIFY YOUR SECOND I DON'T WANT TO SECOND OKAY, SO YOU WITHDRAW YOUR SECOND. COMMISSIONER RICH WOULD YOU LIKE THE SECOND STEP? I DON'T WANT TO DO IT WITHOUT AN RFP. OKAY SO THE ANSWER IS NO, ACTUALLY.

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE WOULD BE JUST LOOKING FOR A SECOND. WE DON'T NEED TO PULL FOR A SECOND.

OKAY SO WITHOUT ANOTHER SECOND, WHO WOULD I PASS THE GAVEL TO THE SECOND MOTION COMMISSIONER BRUNER. MOST SENIOR PERSON ON THE BOARD PASSED THE GAVEL OF COMMISSIONER BRUNER TO SECOND THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR RENEWAL OF A THREE YEAR LEASE. WE HAVE ANY MORE PUBLIC COMMENT.

UM, ROLE PROBABLY. YES, SIR. ONE MORE. I REALLY THINK IN THIS CASE THIS ORGANIZATION NEEDS TO BE GIVEN THE CONFIDENCE THE SUPPORT FROM THE CITY THAT WHAT THEY'RE DOING, THEY RECOGNIZE AND THEY WANT TO CONTINUE TO DO IT. FOR THEM TO CONTINUE TO DO THIS, THE EFFORT THAT THEY'VE GOT TO PUT IN TO JUST GIVE THEM ONE YEAR TO DO IT. I DON'T THINK IS GOOD FOR THE CITIZENS OF OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU CAN HELP. SORRY IF YOU'RE RUNNING THE MEETING RIGHT NOW, FOR THIS ITEM, JUST FILL OUT A GREEN CARD. MCBRIDE PERMANENT, WENT TO THE FIRST MEETING WHEN THEY FIRST STARTED STEWART MAIN STREET AND I AGREE WITH THE JUMP OF ONE YEAR CONTRACT, EVEN MYSELF WITH THAT IF YOU'RE IN BUSINESS, THREE YEAR CONTRACT YOU KNOW? HAS, HE SAID. SEE MY

[02:30:02]

WEDDING. THAT MAY GET MARRIED. IT'S GOING YEAR, BUT ANYONE KNOWS PLANNING WEDDING YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE A RESERVATION A YEAR YEAR AND A HALF AHEAD. SO REALLY, IT SHOULD BE. AND SUCH A GREAT ORGANIZATION AND YOU KNOW I DIDN'T BALANCE HERE AGAIN. THERE MAKE THE DAN AND THING IT IS IT'S A BENEFIT TO THE CITY. BECAUSE, REMEMBER LIKE SOME OF US WE WERE HERE WHEN THIS WAS A GHOST TOWN. AND IF IT WASN'T FOR STEWART MAIN STREET, REALLY, BUT LIKE BACK IN DOWNTOWN, AND HE SAID IT AND SUNDAY I KNOW I JUST TOOK HIM DOWN. BUT NOW IT'S TOO CROWDED. WELL, I CAME DOWN THIS SUMMER TIME NOW AT THE WINTER IS COMING. IT'S JUST A WONDERFUL ORGANIZATION. BUT THE MAIN THING IS, IT BRINGS US TOGETHER. ALL OF US WHO WENT LAST YEAR. WELL I GO EVERY YEAR FOR THE LIGHTING OF THE TREE. YOU GOTTA COME EARLIER BECAUSE THE PLACE IS JAM PACKED. BUT HIS FAMILY WE WATCH THESE YOUNG CHILDREN. I'VE NEVER SEEN SO MANY YOUNG CHILDREN AND STEWART AND LIKE I SAID, I THOUGHT WHEN I GET WE CAME HERE AND 73 NO, VERY FEW KIDS AROUND , BUT NOW IT'S WONDERFUL. AND I JUST I WISH AND HOPE THAT THE FIRM VISUALS CAN BEHIND SOMETHING THAT BENEFITS ALL THE PRESIDENT'S. NO MATTER IF YOU'RE RICH, POOR THAT IT BENEFITS US ALL. THANK YOU. ARE WE IN THE MIDDLE OF EMOTION? I'M A LITTLE BIT RIGHT THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING UP A NEW EMOTION. WE HAVE TWO THERE IS A MOTION PENDING. SO YOU GUYS ARE IN DELIBERATION OF THE MOTION PENDING, BUT YOU CAN OFFER. UH ADVICE SANDER. REQUEST THAT THE MOTION OR AMEND THE MOTION. IF YOU FEEL LIKE THERE'S SOMETHING TO BE ADDED TO IT. HE MADE MOTION. I MADE THE MOTION. HE'S SECOND IT AND I'M GETTING READY TO DO. ROLL CALL. ASK ONE QUESTION CLARIFYING. COMMISSIONER BRUNER IS THE LEASE UP. THEY IN TURN DAY I JUST HAD IT UP. THE LEASE. IT'S A JANUARY OR IS IT HERE'S JANUARY ONE. YES JANUARY ONE AND JUST FOR CLARITY , JUST SO YOU KNOW HOW THAT ALL ROLLED ON JUNE. 2019 THE CONTRACT WAS SIGNED IN JANUARY. 2020 THE LEAST STARTED BECAUSE THEY NEEDED TIME TO BEING ABLE TO GET IN THERE ON JULY 2020. UM RENT WAS SUPPOSED TO START WE WERE IN OUR COVID YEARS AND THEN OCTOBER 2020 RENT ACTUALLY STARTED. SO TO CONFUSE YOU MORE THAT WE BROUGHT THIS TO YOU NOW TO CLOSE OUT THIS PARTICULAR YEAR TO START THINGS OFF FRESH. YES, THIS CALENDAR YEAR. JANUARY AND THIS WOMAN CANDACE WAS NOT. SHE DID NOT SIGN THAT SHE WAS NOT. NO SHE'S NOT CLARIFICATION . THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR IS TO EXERCISE THE OPTION UNDER THIS LEASE TO EXTEND IT FOR ANOTHER THREE YEAR PERIOD STARTING JANUARY. 1ST CORRECT, OKAY, JUST 23. YES. YES COMMISSIONER, UH, MIKE OR DAVE IN THIS THREE YEAR? COHEN'S, I GUESS, UH, NO, NEVER MIND. I KNOW MY QUESTION. NEVER MIND. I KNOW THE ANSWER, SO NO NEED TO ANSWER. ASK IT. I JUST LIKE THE IDEA OF BEING ABLE TO RFP TO GET CLOSER TO MARKET RATE. I JUST FEEL LIKE THAT'S UM WE'RE JUST FREEZING THAT BY NO, THAT'S NOT A PART OF THIS MOTION. CAN MADAM OR, UM MR COLLINS. SO SHOULD WE SEND THE FEED STORE THAT PAYS A DOLLAR A YEAR UP FOR OUR FEET. FEED STORE IS NOT ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.

NO, BUT IT'S THE SAME THING. THAT'S ENOUGH FOR PROFIT. IT PROVIDES SUPPORT TO THE CITY. SH COMMISSIONER BRUNER TO CALL ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT AND, IF NONE TO ASK FOR ROLL CALL ANYMORE PUBLIC COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL HAVE A ROLL CALL. WAIT A MINUTE. OH YES. ONE MORE.

JUST KEEP ASKING. SOMEBODY'S GONNA COME UP. MY NAME IS BOB MASSEY AND I'VE TRAVELED AROUND THIS STATE WITH ANY MAC. TO UH TO THESE CITIES THAT HAVE DONE SUCH A GREAT JOB, AND SHE'S POINTED OUT. THIS IS WHAT MAIN STREET DID FOR THIS CITY. THIS IS WHAT MAIN STREET DID FOR THAT CITY. WHAT MAIN STREET HAS DONE FOR STEWART IS UNBELIEVABLE, AND YOU CAN COMPARE IT TO ANY ANY TOWN. YOU WANT TO GO TO. STEWART'S KNOCKED THE SOCKS OFF OF EVERYBODY, AND FOR YOU PEOPLE TO THINK ABOUT CUTTING THEIR LEGS OFF ON A ONE YEAR DEAL IS VERY UNFAIR. VERY UNFAIR. YOUR IDEA WAS ONE YEAR. ARE WE UP NOW? ARE WE VOTING ON THREE YEARS? I'M SORRY. I MISSED THAT . I DON'T HEAR TOO WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, OKAY? ALRIGHT, LET'S LET'S LET'S HAVE A VOTE.

[02:35:03]

ROLL CALL INS. NO. COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES MCDONALD. YES, RICH. YES. THANK YOU. CAN I HAVE MY GAVEL BACK? LISTEN TO STICK LOOKING TO BANG SOMETHING. OKAY, SO THE MOTION CARRIES THANK YOU.

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING MAIN STREET. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SHERRY. OKAY LET'S GO TO THE

[16. STUART BOAT SHOW ROAD CLOSURE (RC): RESOLUTION No. 112-2022: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A ROAD CLOSURE FOR THE 49™ ANNUAL STUART BOAT SHOW FROM TUESDAY, JANUARY 10TH 5:00 AM THOUGH MONDAY, JANUARY 16™AT 5:00 PM 2023, ALONG NW DIXIE HIGHWAY (FORMERLY SR 707) FROM ALBANY AVENUE SOUTH OF THE OLD ROOSEVELT BRIDGE TO FERN STREET AT THE FEC RR CROSSING, NORTH OF THE ST. LUCIE RIVER DRAW BRIDGE, SUBJECT TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVAL: PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

BOAT SHOW ROAD CLOSURE MIC. WOULD YOU READ THE RESOLUTION? THIS IS RESOLUTION 112-20 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A ROAD CLOSURE FOR THE 49TH ANNUAL STEWART BOAT SHOW FROM TUESDAY, JANUARY 10TH AT FIVE A.M.

THROUGH MONDAY, JANUARY 16TH. AT FIVE P.M. 2023 ALONG NORTHWEST DIXIE HIGHWAY, WHICH IS FORMERLY STATE ROAD 707, FROM ALBANY AVENUE SOUTH TO THE OLD ROOSEVELT BRIDGE TO FERN STREET AT THE F. E C RAILROAD CROSSING NORTH OF THE ST LUCIE RIVER DRAWBRIDGE SUBJECT TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVAL, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IF YOU THINK THAT LAST ITEM WAS LONG, LET'S GET INTO THIS ONE. NO ACTUALLY, THE REASON THIS IS UN COMMISSIONED ACTION IS BECAUSE PREVIOUSLY, UH , COMMISSIONERS HAD RECEIVED COMPLAINTS ABOUT TRAFFIC DUE TO THE CLOSURE OF OUR ONLY OUR SECOND OF THE TWO NORTH SOUTH THOROUGHFARES THAT WE HAVE LAST YEAR. THE BOAT SHOW. UM HIRE THE SERVICES OF A TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND DID SOME DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE TRAFFIC MODIFICATION, THEN HIRED EXTRA POLICE OFFICERS TO WORK RED LIGHTS. I DIDN'T GET ANY COMPLAINTS THAT I KNOW OF LAST YEAR ABOUT TRAFFIC RELATED ISSUES, COMPLAINED YEAR YEAH, VERY SMOOTHLY. SO THIS IS A REQUEST THAT FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO SEND THIS TO THE STATE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CLOSE THE ROAD TO HAVE ANNUAL BOAT SHOW. MOTION TO APPROVE IF I COULD, IF I COULD JUST ALSO MAKE ONE OTHER COMMENT. IF WHEN YOU GET TO DO IT, I KNOW BUT IF THEY COULD MOVE THE SIGN CLOSER TO SELFISH CIRCLE BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE START TO TURN DOWN TO GO ON THAT ROAD AND THEN HAVE TO TURN AROUND AND COME BACK UP LIKE YOU CAN TALK TO THEM NOW BY THE TIME ABOUT THE CONDITION OF THE APPROVAL BECAUSE THAT CAUSES THE TRAFFIC TO DO, LIKE THREE POINT TURNS TO TURN BACK TO MAKE THAT A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL. MIKE SAID. OKAY, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND OKAY. COMMISSIONER BRUNER . WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLLINS, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BRUNER. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? TOM TOM, SAY SOMETHING. MR MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. MY NAME IS TOM WHITTINGTON. SOMEHOW I AM PRESIDENT OF THE MARINE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE TREASURE COAST. NOT SOMETHING THAT I SAW COMING, BUT WHAT I'M REALLY PLEASED ABOUT IS WHAT OUR ASSOCIATIONS DOING, ESPECIALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING, HAVING TO DO WITH TRAINING, GETTING PEOPLE INTO THE TRADES FOR THE MARINE INDUSTRY. WE'RE BRINGING SERVICES TO OUR ASSOCIATION MEMBERS LIKE COMPETITIVE HEALTH INSURANCE, MAKING IT A VALUE FOR THEM TO BE PART OF THE ASSOCIATION. WORKING VERY STRONGLY WITH THE WITH THE COUNTY AND THE CITY TO TRY TO HAVE THE ASSOCIATION DOING THE TYPE OF THINGS THAT YOU GUYS WANT US TO DO. WE WANT TO GET BEHIND BETTER PLANNING FOR HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS FOR THE MARINE INDUSTRY. WE WANT TO GET INVOLVED IN MORE APPRENTICESHIP OR TRAINING. SO WE'RE WORKING WITH A LOT OF FOLKS. A LOT OF OUR ASSOCIATION MEMBERS IN DISCUSSING THOSE TYPE OF THINGS , AND THAT'S WHAT THE MONEY THAT WE MAKE FROM THE STEWART BOAT SHOW GOES TO SO WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT. WE DID HIRE A SUSAN O'ROURKE'S COMPANY TO DO THE SIGNAGE DO THE TRAFFIC STUDY . WE CAME UP WITH SOMETHING WE IMPLEMENTED IT. GOTTA CALL THE FIRST DAY. WELL, THERE'S NOT A SIGN HERE. WELL THE STUDY DIDN'T SHOW WE NEED TO SIGN THERE. WE PUT A SIGN THERE. WE WANT EVERYBODY TO BE HAPPY. UM MR MARTEL. I WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHERE YOU WANT THIS SIGN TO GO. AND IT WILL BE THERE ALSO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE FOR THE WORK THAT THE POLICE AND THE TRASH AND EVERYBODY IS DOING. IT REALLY MAKES THE SHOW WHAT IT IS, AND WE ARE ALREADY SOLD OUT. WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO ANOTHER GREAT YEAR AND REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT. THANK YOU. OKAY IF THERE'S NOT ANY OTHER PARTY PUBLIC COMMENT, MARRIED YOU CALL THE ROLE MAY HAVE A COMMENT, MR YES. I THINK ONE OF THE REASONS PEOPLE ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE TRAFFIC IS THE TRAFFIC IS SO BAD. SO MUCH OF THE TIME NOW PEOPLE CAN'T ATTRIBUTE IT TO THE BOOK JOB. UNFORTUNATELY, BUT IF IT WEREN'T FOR THE BOAT SHOW THAT THE US SAILING CENTER WOULD NOT EXIST BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE

[02:40:03]

WE GOT OUR START, AND IT'S JUST IT'S A YEAH, IT'S A GREAT ASSET TO THANK YOU. PENNY IN THE CITY, MARY. MAYOR MCDONALD. YES COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES, MR COLLINS? YES YES. OKAY MOVING ON

[17. IMPACT FEE UPDATE STUDY (RC) RESOLUTION No. 105-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA ACCEPTING THE CONSULTANT STUDY OF UPDATED IMPACT FEE OPTIONS AS CONTRACTED; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

TO THE NEXT ITEM. THE IMPACT THE STUDY, MIKE, COULD YOU REALLY THE RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NUMBER 105-202 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE CONSULTANT'S STUDY OF UPDATED IMPACT. THE OPTIONS IS CONTRACTED, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. FROM DAVE, ARE YOU THINKING THIS ONE? YES. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. SO AS YOU KNOW, THE CITY IS REQUIRED TO DO UPDATES AND DO A MOST RECENT STUDY OF DATA, AND SO THE CITY HIRES A CONSULTANT FOR THIS PURPOSE, AND I BELIEVE BEN GRIFFIN FROM TISCHLER BIASES HERE TO PRESENT THIS STUDY. MAYOR COUNCIL OR COMMISSION MEMBERS, UH, CITY MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY UM, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS. FOR A WHILE NOW, AND, UH, YOU KNOW, TONIGHT IS, I GUESS THE FIRST READING, UM I DID PREPARE A PRESENTATION. I'M NOT SURE IF THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU. YEAH. I HAVE EMAILED OR SOME DRIVE DRIVE.

HEY, PAUL. THERE ARE A LOT OF NUMBERS. I GOT THE STUDY, BUT NOT A PRESENTATION. IT'S AMAZING HOW THESE NUMBERS ALWAYS GO DOWN. I KNOW. UH IT IS STRANGE THEY ARE GOING DOWN THIS TIME.

JUST ACROSS THE COUNTY LINE. THEY ARE NOT DOING THAT. THEY'RE GOING UP. YES. AND JUST FOR THE COMMISSIONER'S KNOWLEDGE. UM ONCE YOU ACCEPT OR IF YOU ACCEPT THIS STUDY, WE WOULD THEN BASED ON WHAT YOUR RECOMMENDATION IS FOR IT IF YOU LOOK IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MOTION, YOU'LL SEE THAT WE RECOMMEND USING, UH, SPECIFIC. THE SPECIFIC. UTILIZING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEES ARE STATED ON PAGES SIX THROUGH SEVEN. THAT'S A RECOMMENDED MOTION. AND WITH THAT, OR IF YOU CHOOSE SOME OTHER OPTION, WE WILL BRING BACK AN ORDINANCE FOR TWO READING ON THE ORDINANCE TO ACTUALLY CHANGE THE IMPACT THESE WITHIN THAT ORDINANCE. SO THIS TONIGHT IS JUST THE STUDY ITSELF ACCEPTING THE STUDY. CUTE. ALRIGHT SO I'M GONNA TRY AND MOVE THROUGH THIS QUICKLY. IF AT ANY POINT YOU HAVE A QUESTION. FEEL FREE TO INTERRUPT ME. UM I'M GONNA START OFF WITH SORT OF SOME IMPACT. YOU WANNA ONE? SO ANYONE WHO HAS NOT DONE IMPACT FEES BEFORE IT ALL SORT OF BRING YOU UP TO SPEED AND THEN WE'LL MOVE INTO THE ACTUAL FEE CALCULATIONS.

ADDITIONAL RISE HAS BEEN CONSULTING FOR OVER 40 YEARS. WE WORKED ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

WE DO A LOT OF WORK IN FLORIDA. CURRENTLY WE'RE WORKING WITH CLAY COUNTY SCHOOLS WERE WORKING WITH PORTS ST LUCIE. UM WE ARE FINISHING UP WITH FLAGLER WERE WORKING IN THE CITY OF MIAMI. SO YOU KNOW WE ARE WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH. YOU KNOW WHAT WE WERE TASKED TO DO IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA? UM SO YOU KNOW WHAT? OUR IMPACT FEES SO IMPACT? THESE ARE A ONE TIME PAYMENT FOR GROWTH RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE. THEY CANNOT BE USED FOR OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION. THIS IS JUST FOR GROWTH RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE. IT'S NOT A TAX. IT IS A CONSTRUCT A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT TO BUILD GROWTH RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE. SO WITH IMPACT THESE WE HAVE TO PROVE THREE THINGS. THERE'S NEED PROPORTIONALITY AND BENEFIT. SO I NEED YOU. WE PROVED THAT BY SAYING, HEY, YOU KNOW IF YOU KEEP GROWING, WHAT ARE YOUR GROWTH RELATED NEEDS? YOU KNOW WHAT ARE THE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS THAT WILL BE FUNDED THROUGH THE IMPACT. SO WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE PROVIDING THAT INFRASTRUCTURE AS GROWTH OCCURS. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE PROVIDING SYSTEM LEVEL IMPROVEMENTS, NOT PROJECT LEVEL IMPROVEMENTS. SO A AH, A SYSTEM LEVEL IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE WIDENING CORRIDOR THROUGH TOWN, A SYSTEM LEVEL IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE ADDING A TURN LANE BECAUSE A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDED THAT TURN LIGHT. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU KNOW THERE IS A BENEFIT TO EVERYONE BY THESE BY THESE GROCERY, RIGHT AND INFRASTRUCTURE. SO THROUGH PROPORTIONATE SHARE. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE CHARGING EVERYONE THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE. SO IF YOU KNOW, THERE ARE MORE RESIDENTS IN A SINGLE FAMILY UNIT COMPARED TO A MULTI FAMILY UNIT AND THAT SINGLE FAMILY UNIT A MORE BECAUSE THEY HAVE MORE PEOPLE IN THAT UNIT, UM, ON THE NON RESIDENTIAL SIDE,

[02:45:02]

COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL USES, GENERATING MORE TRIPS SO THEY SHOULD PAY MORE IN FEES THAN SAY , YOU KNOW, AN INDUSTRIAL USE. SO THAT'S HOW WE VARY THE FEES PROPORTIONATELY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE YOU KNOW. CHARGING PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR DEMAND, AND THE FINAL IS BENEFIT. THAT'S TWO PARTS. THE FIRST IS A GEOGRAPHIC BENEFIT. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IF SOMEONE PAYS THAT THEY LIVE CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE IMPROVEMENT TO RECEIVE THAT. THE OTHER PART OF BENEFIT IS THAT IF SOMEONE PAYS YOU FOR GROWTH RATE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT YOU THEN BUILD IT UM, THERE ARE THREE METHODOLOGIES. WE LOOK AT THEM AS POINTS IN TIME TO PAST PRESENT FUTURE. SO THE PAST, YOU KNOW THAT IS GOING TO BE A COST RECOVERY APPROACH. SO IF THERE'S EXCESS CAPACITY AND YOU HAVE DEBT RELATED TO THAT EXCESS CAPACITY YOU COULD HAVE USED DEVELOPED BY INTO THAT EXCESS CAPACITY. UM PRESIDENT WOULD BE THE INCREMENTAL OR CONSUMPTION BASED APPROACH WHERE YOU SAY THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE TODAY. SO WE HAVE THIS MANY, YOU KNOW, PARK AMENITIES PER PERSON. WE WANT TO MAINTAIN THAT GOING FORWARD, SO YEAH, THAT WOULD BE THE CONSUMPTION BASED APPROACH, JUST MAINTAINING THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND THEN LOOKING AT THE FUTURE IS THE PLAN BASED APPROACH. WHERE YOU SAY THESE ARE SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO BUILD. UM WE CAN LOOK AT OUR C I P WE CAN GET ACCURATE COSTS FOR THIS. SO YOU KNOW YOU WOULD USE A PLAN BASED APPROACH ON THAT. AND YOU WOULD SAY, OKAY, WELL, THIS IS GROWTH SHARED. THIS IS EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SHARE TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE NOT OVERCHARGING. UH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AGAIN BECAUSE YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE NEVER CHARGING FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR A HIGHER LEVEL OF SERVICE RECEIVED FROM EXISTING DEVELOPMENT BASICALLY WENT TREAT EVERYONE THE SAME.

RIGHT THERE ARE THREE TYPES OF CREDITS. THERE'S A SITE SPECIFIC CREDIT. SO IF SOMETHING IS INCLUDED IN THE IMPACT THE STUDY AND HE DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTS THAT WE WOULD WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU PROVIDED CREDIT FOR THAT, UM , THE OTHER TO DEBT SERVICE AND DEDICATED REVENUES. THOSE ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE STUDY. SO IF THERE IS SOME SORT OF REVENUE USED TO RETIRE, DEBT OR FUND SOME TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT THAT WE HAVE INCLUDED, THEN WE WOULD NEED TO INCLUDE A CREDIT INTO THE IMPACT THE STUDY TO REDUCE THE IMPACT BE SO THE YOU KNOW. THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ISN'T PAYING ONCE THROUGH THE FEE AND ONCE THROUGH THAT FUTURE REVENUE SOURCE. ALRIGHT ANY QUESTIONS ON METHODOLOGY BEFORE WE MOVE INTO THE BIG CHANGES IN FLORIDA LEGISLATION SINCE YOUR CURRENT FEES WERE ADOPTED. GO AHEAD. SO THE UPDATED LEGISLATION IN FLORIDA UM YOU KNOW, IT PUTS SOME LIMITS ON THE FEE INCREASES . ESSENTIALLY YOUR CAPTAIN 50% FEE INCREASE UNLESS YOU AND THIS IS TOWARDS THE MIDDLE. UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE, UH, FOR THEIR EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES, YOU HAVE TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND YOU HAVE A TWO THIRDS VOTE TO ACCEPT THAT. UM IF YOU DON'T DO THAT, THEN ANY FEE INCREASE UP TO 50% HAS TO BE PHASED IN. OVER FOUR YEARS AND EQUAL INCREMENTS IF THE INCREASES UP TO 25% THEN IT'S GONNA BE PHASED IN OVER TWO YEARS AND THEN EQUAL INCREMENTS.

UM I'LL SHOW YOU THIS AT THE END BECAUSE SOME OF YOUR FEES DID EXCEEDED 50% INCREASE. SO YOU'RE CAPPED AT 50% AND YOU HAVE TO FACE THEM IN. UM THAT'S WHAT'S PAGES SIX AND SEVEN IN THE REPORTER. SHOWING IS YOU KNOW WHAT? YOUR YEAR ONE MAX, WHICH ARE YOUR TWO MAX? ESSENTIALLY MAKING SURE THAT YOU'RE FACING THOSE IN EQUAL INCREMENTS. AND THEN YOU MAY NOT INCREASE YOUR FEES MORE THAN ONCE EVERY FOUR YEARS. YES WHEN IS THE LAST TIME WE HAD AN INCREASE? BECAUSE IT SEEMED LIKE LOOKING THROUGH THIS. THERE WAS SO MUCH DISPARITY BETWEEN WHERE WE NEED TO BE AND WHERE WE ARE. WHILE I'M GONNA TAKE A GUESS AND SAY THE LAST TIME WE ACTUALLY THE LAST TIME WE DID AN IMPACT THE STUDY, PROBABLY SEVEN YEARS AGO , THERE WAS ACTUALLY SOME OTHER THINGS DECREASED AND SOME INCREASED, BUT UM, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, SOME OF THEM ARE INDEXED AS WELL SO THEY MIGHT DECREASE INITIALLY. DO THEY INCREASE? NO NO ONE WAS SET. IT WAS SET. THIS ONE IS PROPOSING AND ENSURE HE'LL EXPLAIN INDEX BECAUSE OF STATE LAW. THERE WAS ALSO A NEGOTIATION THE CITY MANAGER DID WITH THE COUNTY AS A RELATED TO THE COUNTY IMPACT PEACE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, AND HE NEGOTIATED A 50% REDUCTION IN THOSE IMPACT FEES.

THREE YEARS AGO. WAS IT ROUGHLY STILL COLLECT THE COUNTIES IN PEPE'S SCHOOL BOARD? MUCH MONEY HAVE THEY SPENT IN THE CITY? THERE ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN THEY PRIOR TO THAT NEGOTIATION THAT HE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ON IT WAS ALMOST ZERO. IN FACT, IT WAS $33,000 IN 10 YEARS, AND THAT WAS FOR A STUDY. BUT NOW THERE'S ACTUALLY A LOT OF COOPERATION GOING ON, AND THERE'S JUST THINGS ARE DOING JUST ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THEM WHETHER OR NOT SPENDING YEAH, STARTING WITH THE ALICE AVENUE, BUT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING A YEARLY LIST, UM, WORKING WITH THEM ON FUNDING THAT THE COUNTY IMPACT THESE WOULD USE IN THE CITY. DEBUTS THANK YOU. THAT'S

[02:50:05]

GREAT NEWS QUESTIONS. COUNSELOR. COLLEGE GREAT. ALL RIGHT. SO, UH , HOLD ON. UM SO WE'RE STAYING HERE. THIS IS THE 10 YEAR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTIONS THAT WE HAVE TO PROVIDE IN THE STUDY ESSENTIALLY SAYING, YOU KNOW, HERE IS YOUR YOUR BASE, AND THIS IS WHERE WE THINK YOU'D BE OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS. SO TO PROJECT THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE, WE LOOKED AT YOUR LAST FEW YEARS OF RESIDENTIAL PERMITS, AND WE ASSUMED THAT THERE WOULD BE A SIMILAR GROWTH RATE THROUGH 2025. BEYOND 2025. WE USE THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA'S BIEBER PROJECTIONS FOR A GROWTH RATE.

SO 2025 THROUGH 2032 IS USING THAT THAT'D BE RE PROJECTION AND THEN WE HAVE THE NON RESIDENTIAL SIDE WORKING WITH STAFF. UH THE GROWTH RATE ON THE NON RESIDENTIAL. IT'S GONNA BE 1.5% UP TO 4. WHAT IT'S SAYING IS, YOU KNOW A POPULATION INCREASE OF ABOUT 3200 PEOPLE AND EMPLOYMENT INCREASE OF ABOUT 9900. ANY QUESTIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT PROTECTIONS. I HOPE YOU'RE WRONG ABOUT THE RESIDENTIAL. PROBLEM. UM ONE. PERK TO HOW WE'VE DONE. A LOT OF THESE FEES IS, YOU KNOW WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO ISOLATE THE ACTUAL FEES FROM SLOWDOWNS. OR EVEN INCREASES IN THE IN THE IN THE MARKET. SO A LOT OF THESE, YOU KNOW THEY'RE USING A CONSUMPTION BASED APPROACH WHERE IT'S JUST THE EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE. SO IF YOU GROW 10 TIMES AS MUCH, IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE JUST GENERATE 10 TIMES THE REVENUE YOU BUILD 10 TIMES AS MUCH IF YOU DON'T GROW AT ALL. YOU DON'T COLLECT ANY REVENUE ON THE HOOK. SO WE'VE TRIED TO AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. ISOLATE THE GENERAL FUND FROM CHANGES IN THE MARKET. DOES THIS INCLUDE. KIND OF WHERE WE WERE ON 22 HERE, BUT THE ROUGHLY 3000 UNITS THAT WE'VE APPROVED. IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS. MOST OF THAT MULTI FAMILY IN TERMS OF UNITS. YEAH. AND IS THAT REFLECTED THE IMPACT FEES AS WELL? 100% WHAT I'M ASKING, THOUGH, IS THE PROJECTIONS BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE SINGLE FAMILY. SORT OF MOVES UP ALONG SIMILARLY WITH MULTI FAMILY, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE IN OUR CITY IT HAD THAT HASN'T BEEN THE CASE. AS OF LATE. IT'S BEEN MUCH MORE MULTI FAMILY. SO AS AS HE STATED EARLIER. THESE ARE BIEBER PROJECTIONS, AND SO THEY BASED THEM ON HISTORY DATA. AND SO THE GROWTH THAT WE'VE RECENTLY EXPERIENCED WHILE MAJORITY OF THAT IS AND YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THIS IN THE JANUARY PRESENTATION ON WHAT WE HAVE LEFT THERE'S ACTUALLY A LOT MORE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS SPREAD OUT THROUGHOUT THE CITY THAT HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO GROW WHERE THERE'S NO MULTI FAMILY LAB. SO YOU'RE YOU WILL SEE BALANCING OF THAT AS WE MOVE FORWARD QUESTION IF IT'S BASED ON BIEBER AND NOT REALLY US, HOW WOULD THAT IMPACT OUR IMPACT FEES, YOU KNOW? POTENTIALLY. BEAVER FAMILY VERSUS THE ONLY DATA THAT WE REALLY HAVE, AND IT'S A DATA THAT IF I CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG THAT THE STATE EXPECTS US TO RELY ON A LOT OF FLORIDA COMMUNITIES USE BIEBER. CORRECT. UM AND, YOU KNOW, KEEP IN MIND. YOU CANNOT BEAT THIS EVERY FOUR YEARS. SO YOU KNOW, THERE'S FIRST THROUGH 2025 WERE USING RECENT PERMITS. UM YOU KNOW IT.

THE OUT YEARS ARE MORE CONSERVATIVE BECAUSE WE'RE USING BIEBER. SO IT HAS A SLIGHTLY LOWER GROWTH RATE. BUT AGAIN, YOU'RE GONNA BE UPDATING, YOU KNOW, AT LEAST EVERY FOUR YEARS ANYWAY. AND SO YOU CAN, YOU KNOW, GO IN, YOU CAN SAY HEY, LOOK, THIS IS WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS. WE CAN GO AHEAD AND UPDATE THIS AGAIN. ALSO YOU WOULD WANT TO UPDATE EVERY FOUR YEARS. UM SINCE YOU ARE LIMITED TO THAT 50% INCREASE NOW. UM YOU WOULD WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE STAYING ON TOP OF THAT, BECAUSE WITH CONSTRUCTION COSTS INCREASING. YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU DON'T GET TOO FAR BEHIND IN ANY OF YOUR UPDATES.

MASKING IS HYPOTHETICALLY IF YOU HAD MORE MULTI FAMILY, ACTUALLY IN YOUR DEVELOPMENT, HOW WOULD THAT IMPACT THE IMPACT FEES FROM MULTI FAMILY VERSUS LIKE SINGLE FAMILY? WOULD THAT CHANGE ANYTHING? FOR MOST OF YOUR FEES WOULD CHANGE NOTHING BECAUSE MOST OF THEM ARE INCREMENTAL THE MULTIMODAL FEED BECAUSE IT'S A PLAN BASED, IT WOULD CHANGE ITS SLIGHTLY ADDING MORE WOOD. BUT BASICALLY LIGHTLY DECREASE IT, BUT HE WOULD NOT CHANGE THE RATIO BETWEEN YOU KNOW WHAT SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS WITH THE PROJECTIONS? OKAY. ALRIGHT, SO WE'LL START WITH MULTIMODAL. WE'RE GOING TO USE A CITYWIDE SERVICE AREA. WE USE A PLAN BASED APPROACH FOR THIS. UM SO THE MULTIMODAL IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS HAVE A TOTAL COST OF ABOUT $5.6 MILLION ABOUT 5.1 MILLION OF THAT IS GROWTH

[02:55:05]

RELATED. UH YOU KNOW, ALMOST 600,000 IS EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SHARE. SO WHAT YOU CAN SEE HERE.

THESE ARE THE SPECIFIC PROJECTS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE MIDDLE. THERE IS A TOTAL COST.

THERE'S A GROWTH CHAIR AND THE GROWTH COST. THE IMPACT FEES ARE BASED ON THIS GROWTH COST, SO IT'S YOU KNOW, ALLOCATING THE GROWTH COST TO DEVELOPMENT OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS, AND SO WHAT IT'S SAYING IS OKAY, THIS, YOU KNOW, $5.1 MILLION WE'RE GOING TO ALLOCATE THIS TO THE INCREASE IN TRIPS OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS, AND SO EACH TRIP GENERATED SHOULD PAY ABOUT $88. THAT THEN TURNS INTO, UM YOU KNOW THE TRIPS GENERATED BY DIFFERENT TYPES OF UNITS SO YOU CAN SEE A SINGLE FAMILY UNIT WOULD GENERATE 8.36 TRIPS ON AN AVERAGE DAY. YOU MULTIPLY THAT BY $87.58. AND SO THE MULTIMODAL FEE FOR SINGLE FAMILY WILL BE $732. THE EXISTING FEE IS $1202 . YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE. THE RESIDENTIAL FEES ARE DECREASING AND MOST OF THE NON RESIDENTIAL FEES ARE ACTUALLY INCREASING. THAT'S JUST, YOU KNOW. BASED ON TRIP GENERATION RATES THAT HAVE BEEN UPDATED SINCE YOU KNOW YOUR PREVIOUS STUDIES. UM YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST A CHANGE NATIONALLY THAT'S BEEN SEEN AND SO IT'S SHIFTING A LITTLE MORE OF THAT TRIP DEMAND TOWARDS THE NON RESIDENTIAL SIDE. ANY QUESTIONS WHERE THE MULTIMODAL FEES RIGHT? NEXT MOVE TO PARKS AND REC AGAIN A CITYWIDE SERVICE AREA. WE HAVE PARK AMENITIES AS OUR ONLY COMPONENT WHERE USING THE INCREMENTAL METHODOLOGY WHERE WE SAY WE HAVE, YOU KNOW A CERTAIN NUMBER OF AMENITIES TODAY PER PERSON. WE WANT TO MAINTAIN THAT GOING FORWARD, SO YOU'LL SEE THIS ALL THE MORE THE NEXT SLIDE . BUT OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS YOU WOULD GENERATE ABOUT $1.4 MILLION TO BUILD. BASICALLY 40 ADDITIONAL AMENITIES. SO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE LEFT SIDE? THESE ARE YOUR EXISTING AMENITIES. SO YOU HAVE 249 TODAY? THAT UNIT COST IS WHAT IT WOULD COST YOU TO BUILD SOMETHING SIMILAR TODAY . AND SO WE JUST GET A WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF YOUR EXISTING AMENITIES. AND SO WE'RE SAYING, YOU KNOW, OF YOUR 249 AMENITIES THAT EXIST TODAY. THE COST IS ABOUT 34,000. AND YOU KNOW IF WE MAINTAIN THAT, BASED ON, YOU KNOW, 10 YEARS OF PROJECTED GROWTH YOU WOULD NEED, YOU KNOW.

ESSENTIALLY 40 ADDITIONAL AMENITIES MULTIPLY THAT, BY THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST THAT'S ABOUT $1.36 MILLION. THERE IS NO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT SHARE ON THIS BECAUSE IT'S INCREMENTAL.

IT IS 100% GROWTH RELATED, SO WHATEVER IS GENERATED, AND IN THAT ACCOUNT, YOU SPEND IT TO ADD ADDITIONAL AMENITIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY. UM SO THAT THE COST PER PERSON ON THAT WAS ABOUT $421 YOU MULTIPLY THAT BY THE OCCUPANCY OF THE SINGLE FAMILY OR THE MULTI FAMILY UNIT , AND SO THE PROPOSED WOULD BE $1086 FOR SINGLE FAMILY. YOUR CURRENT FEE IS $121. SO YOU ARE GOING TO BE CAPPED AT 50% UNLESS YOU, UM YOU KNOW, HAVE A STUDY THAT PROVES THE EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. ALRIGHT. YOU NEED QUESTIONS ON PARKS. ALRIGHT SO WE'LL MOVE ON. I'VE SPLIT THE PUBLIC SAFETY FEE INTO FIRE AND POLICE. UM SO WE'LL START WITH FIRE AGAINST CITYWIDE SERVICE AREA. WE HAVE THREE COMPONENTS. THERE IS A PLAN BASED FIRE FACILITIES COMPONENT AND THEN THE FIRE APPARATUS AND FIRE EQUIPMENT USING INCREMENTAL METHODOLOGY. SO FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS, YOU KNOW FIRE FACILITIES . YOU'RE PLANNING TO BUILD 2500 SQUARE FEET. THAT'S $2 MILLION.

THE WAY WE'VE SET UP THIS FEE. THAT'S 100% GROWTH RELATED BECAUSE YOU HAVE A DECLINING LEVEL OF SERVICE. TECHNICALLY, UM AND I'LL GET INTO THAT MORE IN THE NEXT SLIDE. WHERE FIRE APPARATUS YOU NEED APPROXIMATELY ONE ADDITIONAL UNIT AT $690,000 AND THEN FIRE EQUIPMENT YOU NEED ABOUT 18 UNITS, $44,000. SO. WITH THE FIRE FACILITIES COMPONENT. WE'RE LOOKING AT A PLAN BASED APPROACH TO CONSTRUCT FIRE STATION NUMBER THREE, UM. WE ORIGINALLY WE'RE LOOKING AT AN INCREMENTAL METHODOLOGY AND IT, YOU KNOW, GENERATE THE NEED FOR LIKE FIVE OR 6000 SQUARE FEET. FIRE FACILITIES IN TALKING TO STAFF. THERE WAS A PLAN TO DO FIRE STATION THREE WITH 2500 SQUARE FEET. WE KNEW THAT WE WERE GOING TO HAVE ISSUES WITH BEING KEPT ON. YOU KNOW THAT THE FEE INCREASE. AND SO THE DECISION WAS OKAY. WELL YOU KNOW, WHY NOT FOCUS ON THE 2500 ? WE KNOW WE'RE GOING TO BUILD NOT GENERATE EXTRA FOR ADDITIONAL FACILITIES, AND WE CAN PUT SOME OF THAT TOWARDS THE OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY NEEDS. SO WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE IS SAYING , OKAY, WELL, YOU'RE PLANNING TO BUILD 2500 SQUARE FEET. YOU COULD HAVE BUILT MORE SO WE'RE

[03:00:03]

GOING TO ALLOCATE 100% OF THE COST OF THIS GROWTH OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT. YEP. NEXT UP. WE HAVE FIRE APPARATUS. YOU HAVE FIVE UNITS TODAY WITH A WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF $580,000. BASED ON PROJECTED GROWTH. YOU WOULD NEED APPROXIMATELY ONE ADDITIONAL UNIT AND THAT WOULD GENERATE $692,000 IN FEES. ANY QUESTIONS WHERE APPARATUS. NEXT UP EQUIPMENT. SAME THING. YOU HAVE 74 EXISTING UNITS OF EQUIPMENT. THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST IS ABOUT $2500. SO YOU NEED ALMOST EIGHT TEAM ADDITIONAL UNITS, AND SO IT'S ABOUT 44,000 AND FEE REVENUE. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP. WE HAVE POLICE. SO CITYWIDE SERVICE AREA. UM FOR THE FACILITIES WERE USING INCREMENTAL METHODOLOGY FOR POLICE VEHICLES WERE USING PLANT BASED METHODOLOGY.

EQUIPMENT ALSO PLAN BASED METHODOLOGY. SO OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS YOU NEED ABOUT 1100 SQUARE FEET OF FACILITIES, WHICH IS ABOUT $904,000.08. EIGHT VEHICLES AND 50 UNITS OF EQUIPMENT. SO WITH THE FACILITIES YOU HAVE 4300 SQUARE FEET TODAY, UM AND YOU BASED ON MAINTAINING EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE YOU WOULD NEED TO BUILD, YOU KNOW ABOUT 1100 SQUARE FEET AT A COST OF $800 PER SQUARE FOOT. THAT'S JUST SHY OF A MILLION DOLLARS. UM POLICE VEHICLES. THIS WAS SIMILAR TO THE CONVERSATION WE HAD WITH THE FIRE FACILITIES WHERE YOU KNOW IF WE USE THE EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT ACTUALLY SHOWED MANY MORE VEHICLES BEING PURCHASED. AND YOU KNOW, TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS YOU KNOW, YOU DON'T HAVE THIS FISCAL BURDEN BUYING ALL THESE VEHICLES PLACED ON THE CITY. UM YOU KNOW, WE TALKED WITH STAFF AND YOU KNOW, WE CAME UP WITH A LOWER NUMBER, AND HE SAID EIGHT VEHICLES OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS ARE EXPANDING YOUR FLEET BY EIGHT VEHICLES WAS MUCH MORE LIKELY THAT REDUCES THE EXCESS FISCAL BURDEN THAT YOU KNOW, ADDING ADDITIONAL VEHICLES WOULD HAVE ON THE CITY. AND SO THIS IT'S SAYING, YOU KNOW, ALL EIGHT VEHICLES WOULD BE COVERED BY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT . AND THAT'S ABOUT $480,000 FOR THOSE VEHICLES. SAME THING WITH POLICE EQUIPMENT ORIGINALLY WERE GENERATING A NUMBER MORE THAN THIS, UH AND WE BROUGHT THAT NUMBER BACK DOWN AND SAID 50 ADDITIONAL UNITS IS MUCH MORE REASONABLE. AND SO THAT WOULD GENERATE ABOUT $184,000 AND FEE REVENUE OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS.

SO WE ADD ALL THOSE COSTS PER PERSON AND COST PER VEHICLE TRIP TOGETHER AND FOR YOUR PUBLIC SAFETY FEES. A SINGLE FAMILY PROPOSED FEES $1263. THE EXISTING FEE IS 758. SO WE'RE SLIGHTLY CAPPED ON SOME OF THESE , UH YOU SEE INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE. ANOTHER SERVICE GOING DOWN SO THOSE YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO IMMEDIATELY CHARGE THAT PROPOSED IF YOU ADOPTED THAT. SO THE TOP THOSE ARE ALL OF THE FEES THAT YOU SAW IN THE SLIDES. THE MAXIMUM JUSTIFIABLE, UM YOU DO ADD A 3% ADMINISTRATION. THAT FEE ON TOP OF THAT, SO WHAT? WHAT DO YOU REALLY WANT TO FOCUS ON IS THAT YOU KNOW THAT TOTAL COLUMN ALL THE WAY TO THE RIGHT. YOU SEE, THE BOTTOM IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SO ANYWHERE WHERE YOU EXCEEDED 50% 1 OF THE BOTTOM CAPS IT AT 50% SO WHAT YOU WOULD ACTUALLY BE ADOPTING IF YOU CHOSE TO WOULD BE THE FEES AT THE BOTTOM, AND THIS WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE YOUR YEAR FOUR. FT BECAUSE YOU'RE HAVING TO SPREAD THOSE OUT OVER MOST OF THESE OUT OVER FOUR YEARS, SO IN YOUR FOR YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO CHARGE UP TO $2112. MR MAYOR.

BASKETBALL? YES. HUNTER. YOUR MICRO MICROPHONE. FOR EXAMPLE, FIRE ENGINE PUMPER HERE THREE.

THESE ARE 10 YEARS. WE'RE DOING 10 YEAR PROJECTIONS HERE. SAYS YOU NEED THREE AT 600 GRAND FOR A TOTAL OF 1.8 MILLION. WE DON'T NEED THREE. TODAY WE'RE GOING TO NEED ONE IN THREE YEARS IS ANOTHER ONE IN THREE YEARS. IN THE NINTH YEAR. THAT'S $600,000 FIRE ENGINE PUMPER IS NOT GOING TO COST $600,000. IT'S GOING TO COST 900,000. WELL, IT'S NOT SAYING THAT YOU NEED THREE. THIS IS SHOWING. BUT I'M JUST SAYING JUST THE METHODOLOGY REQUIRE YOU TO JUST TAKE A SNAPSHOT. BECAUSE INFLATION IS THE BIGGEST PROBLEM. IT'S BEEN IN 40 YEARS. SO I TAKE A JAB AT THAT REAL QUICK BECAUSE I THINK IT WAS 1.2 APPARATUSES, NOT THREE. AND SO HE THE 600 SOME 1000 WHEN HE

[03:05:03]

SHOWED THE CHARTER OF THE ONES THAT WE RECENTLY PURCHASED, THERE WERE 500, SO I'M JUST LOOKING AT THE PAGE HERE PAGE 2 46. BUT IT THIS SPECIFIC NUMBER IS NOT IMPORTANT. THE IDEA THAT INFLATION HIS STRESSING MUNICIPAL BUDGETS TO A GREAT DEGREE. WE WERE UP IN AGAIN. WE WERE UP IN ROCK LEGEND MILTON. HE BROUGHT SOMEBODY UP AND HE WAS LOOKING AT THIS BIG TRUCK AND HE JUST HE COMMENT AND THEN HOW MUCH MORE IT WAS THE TRUCK THEY HAD BOUGHT BEFORE. SO I'M SAYING, HOW IS THAT? FIGURE IT IN FOR US, WE COULD INCREASE THAT. BUT YOUR FEES ARE ALREADY GONNA BE CAPPED AT 50% ANYWAY. SO YOU'VE EXCEEDED 50% IN MOST OF THESE SOME OF THESE PUBLIC SAFETY FEES SO WE CAN INCREASE THAT NUMBER WE COULD SAY, HEY, WE THINK YOU KNOW INFLATION IS GONNA BE THIS. LET'S GO AHEAD AND BUMP THAT UP. BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO GENERATE ADDITIONAL FEE REVENUE BECAUSE YOU'RE BEING KEPT AT THAT 50% INCREASE. OKAY, SO WE'RE JUST MAXED OUT ANYWAY.

OKAY. UNFORTUNATELY, YES. THANK YOU. PROBABLY ALL RIGHT, AND I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE LAST SLIDE.

SO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS RELATED TO THE IMPACT THESE QUESTIONS? YES, MR COLLINS. SO ALLOWABLE VERSUS JUSTIFIABLE. I'M ASSUMING ALLOWABLE IS THE MAX ALLOWED IN FLORIDA. SO IT'S ON THE NEW ACT. EXACTLY. OKAY BUT WHAT'S INTERESTING IS IT'S BASED ON AN INCREASE. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ALLOWED TO INCREASE IT. YES WHEN I'M LOOKING AT AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG HERE.

FIGURE SEVEN ON PAGE SEVEN. FOUR YEAR MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEES. THIS IS ULTIMATELY WHERE WE'RE GOING. CORRECT THOSE ARE AS FAR AS I'M SEEING DECREASES EXCEPT FOR INSTITUTIONAL SO YOUS DECREASING INSTITUTIONAL. NO SO HELP ME. THINKING BACK. SO IF YOU HIT PAGE SEVEN, YOU'LL SEE WHAT I'M WHERE I'M AT SO AND MULTIMODAL. SOME ARE GOING UP. SOME ARE GOING DOWN SO WE'RE GOING TO BE KEPT ON ANY OF THOSE , UH OR SOME OF THOSE NONRESIDENTIAL. UM BUT YOU SEE THAT $470 PAGE SEVEN. DON'T HAVE PAGE SEVEN IN HERE BECAUSE THAT'S THE REPORT. OKAY JUST HAVE THAT WAS THE SLIDE FROM THE FIGURE SEVEN YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT. I JUST HAVE THIS. AH WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A YEAR FOUR. SO OKAY, SO MULTIMODAL THERE IS, UM.

ACTUALLY I DON'T THINK YOU HIT A CAP ON MULTIMODAL. YOU DO HIT A CAP ON YOUR PARKS FEES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND YOU DO HIT CAPS ON PUBLIC SAFETY. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT INDIVIDUAL ITEMS LIKE MULTIMODAL PARKS AND REC. PUBLIC SAFETY. I'M TALKING ABOUT UM, CURRENT FEES VERSUS THE TOTAL ALTOGETHER. SO. FOR ME. IT'S UH AGAIN PAGE SEVEN FIGURES WHERE WE'RE GOING FROM MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEES. YOUR ONE YOUR TO YOUR THREE YEAR FOUR. IT SEEMS LIKE RELATIVE TO OUR CURRENT IMPACT FEES. ALL OF THESE ARE DECREASING. UH UM. SO IT IS OUR INTERPRETATION. YES.

AND THIS IS A VERY NEW LAW, SO NO ONE HAS TESTED IT YET THAT IT'S EACH COMPONENT INCREASE ITS COMPONENT BASED COMMISSIONER COLLEGES TO HELP YOU OUT. IMPACT FEES ARE ALWAYS STRUGGLE WITH THEM BECAUSE EVERYTHING HAS TO HAVE A NEXUS TO THE PROPERTY, THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE PAYING THE IMPACT FEES. SO THEIR PROJECTS YOU HAVE TO HAVE A NEXUS TO HIM. AH, WITH SO IT'S LIKE THAT THERE'S A ROAD EXPANSION. YOU CAN'T GET AN IMPACT. THE FOR A ROAD, UH, FOR SOME PROJECT AND CANTOR HIGHWAY AND SPEND IT OUT ON THE ISLAND. BECAUSE THERE'S NOT A NEXUS TO WHAT IT IS, IF THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, IS THAT UNFORTUNATELY, YES, THAT IS KIND OF IT. BUT FOR EXAMPLE, YOU CAN'T YOU COULDN'T BUILD A LOCAL ROAD OFF OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE BECAUSE OF THE COSTCO DEVELOPMENT, BUT YOU COULD DO ARTERIAL ROADS AND ENHANCE ALL HERE TO PUT FUNDS FOR ARTERIAL ROADS FROM A COSTCO DEVELOPMENT . THAT MAY NOT BE RIGHT NEXT TO IT, IF YOU COULD FORECAST AND DEMONSTRATE A RATIONAL NEXUS THAT THOSE THE TRAFFIC WOULD BE USED BY THOSE COST, OH, PEOPLE BUT IT'S A IT'S KIND OF A VAGARY . BUT YES, THERE HAS TO BE A RATIONAL NEXUS BETWEEN AN IMPACT THAT THE DEVELOPER ACTUALLY RECEIVES BENEFIT FROM THE FUNDS.

AND THAT'S JUST ONE OF THE IT'S A HARD THING TO WRAP AROUND. WHAT IS A BENEFIT. TO THE

[03:10:04]

PROPERTY OWNER PAID B IMPACT FEES. IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT? THANK YOU. SO. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT CURRENT IMPACT FEES. AND I'M REFERRING TO ON PAGE FIVE. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MEANS ANYTHING TO YOU, BUT I FIGURE TO CURRENT IMPACT FEES, RIGHT? I'M TALKING SPECIFICALLY IN THE REALM OF SINGLE FAMILY. MULTI FAMILY JUST FOR SIMPLICITY. OUR CURRENT IMPACT FEES FROM MULTIMODAL ARE $1202 FOR SINGLE FAMILY. UH, THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE. SO WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING HERE GOES DOWN TO 7 32. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PARKS AND RECREATION. UH CURRENT IS 1 21 THAT GOES TO 1 81 CURRENT ON PUBLIC SAFETY IS 7 58. AND THAT WOULD GO UP TO 11. 37. SO IT SEEMS LIKE THESE NUMBERS ARE JUST KIND OF LIKE MIXING AROUND. BUT THE NET HERE'S A DECREASE.

WHY WOULD WE DECREASE OUR IMPACT FEES? I'M JUST THIS IS MORE OF A QUESTION FOR UNDERSTANDING. WHY WOULD WE DO IT AREN'T THOSE LINE ITEMS WHERE IT'S PROPOSED TO DECREASE? WHY WOULD WE DO IT LATER EXPLAINED TO ME, LAST TIME I DID WAS INVOLVED WAS THAT I PARKS AND REC WENT DOWN THE LAST TIME BECAUSE THE CITY HAS OVER CAPACITY OF PARKS. SO EVEN IF WE ADD 5000 PEOPLE. WE HAVE SO MUCH PARK SPACE THAT WE JUST CAN'T JUSTIFY BUILDING MORE PARKS. SO, UM AND SAME WITH, UH. ROADS THERE'S REALLY NO PLACE TO BUILD. THERE'S VERY FEW PLACES TO BUILD. AND IF WE DON'T IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY INTENTION TO BUILD ROADS AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS TO DESIGNATE THE ROADS. IT'S HARD PRESSED TO COLLECT MONEY FOR ROADS, UNDERSTAND, RIGHT? AND I'M SORRY AND OVERALL, IF YOU IF YOU LOOK AT FIGURE TO WHICH YOU WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT AND FIGURE THREE OF THE SUB TOTAL OVERALL THE NEW MAXIMUM JUSTIFIABLE IMPACT IS HIGHER. I MEAN, WHEN YOU WHEN YOU COMBINE THE THREE CATEGORIES , SO THE SUB TOTAL CURRENTLY JUSTIFIABLE, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE ALLOWED TO USE RIGHT? WE CAN ONLY USE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE. THE JUSTIFIABLE. YES, I'M WITH YOU, BUT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE USING IS THE MAX ALLOWABLE AT FOUR YEARS. THAT'S OUR GOAL. WHAT'S REALLY HOLDING YOU UP? IS THAT YOUR CURRENT PARK FEE? YES, $121. MAXIMUM JUSTIFIABLE PARK FEE FOR SINGLE FAMILIES. 1000 86. BUT YOU CAN ONLY GO UP TO 180 SOMETHING DOLLARS BECAUSE THAT 50% INCREASE, OKAY? SO I MEAN, WE'RE SHOWING DEMAND FOR YOU KNOW, ALMOST A 10 TIMES INCREASE ON PARKS, BUT BECAUSE YOUR CURRENT PART HE IS SO LOW, YOU'RE STUCK. OKAY? THAT WAS ALL I WAS JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? MOTION APPROVED. TO APPROVE YOU HAVE A SECOND, USING THE MAXIMUM MOTION TO ACCEPT USING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CAN CAN YOU PUT THAT IN YOUR MOTION MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PERFECT. THERE WE GO. THANK YOU , COMMISSIONER BRUNER. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? STEERING DONE. I GET PEOPLE SHAKING THEIR HEAD. NO, WE HOPE NOT. UH AND MARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? COMMISSIONER RICH. YES.

COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES, COMMISSIONER COLLINS? YES. MCDONALD? YES. THANK YOU, MR GRIFFIN ALSO WANT TO THANK MICHELLE BURGER FOR CHEAP LEAD THIS PROJECT FOR US. THANK YOU.

OKAY MOVING ON TO THE NEXT TITLE, ADAPT. MPO VISION. ZERO PLAN. MIKE, WOULD YOU READ THE

[18. ADOPT MPO VISION ZERO PLAN RESOLUTION No. 109-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA ADOPTING THE MARTIN MPO VISION ZERO PLAN TO ELIMINATE ALL TRAFFIC RELATED FATALITIES AND SERIOUS INJURIES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSESS.]

RESOLUTION? HMM. TRYING. TO THAT'S HIS RESOLUTION NUMBER 109-20 TO 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE MARTIN MPO VISION ZERO PLAN TO ELIMINATE ALL TRAFFIC RELATED FATALITIES AND SERIOUS INJURIES , PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. OKAY YOU KNOW, JUST GET RID OF CARS AND DAVID. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND HANDLE THIS. YES, SIR. UM SO AS MANY OF YOU KNOW, I'M THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MPO AS WELL AS I'LL BE ON THE CITY COMMISSION. AND EARLIER THIS YEAR, WE PASSED THE VISION ZERO PLAN AND TO WHAT THE VISION ZERO PLAN IS THAT THE MARTIN MPO, THE FOUR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE U. S.

DEPARTMENT. TRANSPORTATION OF VISION OF A WORLD WITH ZERO TRAFFIC FATALITIES. AND OBVIOUSLY THAT'S A VERY LOFTY, UM, LOFTY, LOFTY GOAL. UH SO THE MARTIN MPO HAS PRODUCED THIS

[03:15:06]

VISION EURO PLAN TO TALK ABOUT PLANNING HOW WE CAN PLAN FOR BETTER ROADS THAT ARE SAFER ROADS AND JUST ONE OF THE THINGS I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT. IS THAT THE IF YOU LOOK AT THE REPORT THAT'S ATTACHED TO THE AGENDA AH, THAT USES THE DATA YEARS OF 2013 THROUGH 2017 ANDND THE REASON, THE CONSULTANT SAID . THOSE WERE THE YEARS THOSE WERE THE ONLY FULL DATA SET THAT HAS BEEN AUDITED DATA TO CONFIRM THE NUMBER OF CRASHES AND FATALITIES AND MARTIN COUNTY AND DURING THAT FIVE YEAR PERIOD THERE WAS 300. 51 CRASHES THAT INVOLVED FATALLY OR SERIOUSLY INJURED INJURIES BETWEEN THAT PERIOD. AND I KNOW THAT IT WAS A FEW AND STEWART THERE WAS SOME RIGHT ON US ONE AND SO BYPASSING DIVISION, GERALD, WE'RE GONNA THE IDEAS THAT WILL TAKE, UM, TRAFFIC SAFETY INTO CONSIDERATION WITH OUR WITH OUR PLANNING, AND THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL BENEFIT WHEN WE SEEK FEDERAL GRANTS. UM THAT WILL BE GIVE US ADDITIONAL POINTS TOWARDS RECEIVING THOSE GREAT FEDERAL GRANTS, WHICH IS ALL OUR TAX MONEY THAT WE PAID. UP TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. MAYBE WE CAN GET A LITTLE BIT OF IT BACK SO I WOULD APPRECIATE A MOTION TO PASS. I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING. AND UH AND IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'M NOT THE EXPERT ON IT, BUT CERTAINLY BE DO MY BEST ANSWER. JUST WHAT THE IMPLICATIONS WOULD BE FOR THE CITY. THAT'S WE POTENTIALLY GET GREAT ADDITIONAL CRAP THERE. CERTAIN STIPULATIONS OF CITY HAS TO FOLLOW. SO THERE ARE SOME LIKE PLAYING ELEMENTS IN THE BACK AND THE CHIEF WAS OUT OF TOWN. SO I GAVE IT TO THE CAPTAIN AND SHE SAID, WE COULD DO EVERYTHING SO WELL AND WE HAD THE STUART PD THERE, ALONG WITH THE MARKET COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AT PAST THE VISION ZERO PLANT AT THE MPO, AND SO THE WE HAVE PASSED IT AT THE MPO. SO THERE IS ACTUALLY IS HERE. BUT IN LIGHT OF UH, TWO THINGS ONE. THE GRANT ASPECT OF IT, BUT ALSO THAT HORRIFIC ACCIDENT NORTH OF THE BRIDGE. UM AND. I WOULD JUST SAY THAT IT WAS HORRIFIC. IT WAS SAD. UM I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN EVER STOP YOUNG KIDS. FROM DOING THINGS IN CARS THAT THEY PROBABLY SHOULDN'T BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY ASPIRE. TO THAT, AND HOPEFULLY THAT WE WON'T SEE AN ACCIDENT LIKE THAT AND IN OUR COMMUNITY AGAIN, SO I'D LIKE TO TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO THROW YOU AN ATTA BOY. AS THE CHAIR OF THE MPO. A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE THAT YOU ARE PUTTING STEWARDS, UM.

GOALS AND WHAT WHAT WE WANT TO SEE IN TRAFFIC, AND I'VE SEEN IT FIRSTHAND BEING ON THE MPO WITH YOU. SO THANK YOU FOR REPRESENTING IT AND MAKING SURE THAT HOW WE GET TO DRIVE AROUND IS CONSIDERED WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHAT WERE, YOU KNOW, PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE, SO I'D LIKE TO MOTION TO APPROVE. OKAY OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLLINS HAD A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PROFESSOR. THANK YOU. FOR THOSE KIND WORDS. ABSOLUTELY. YES.

COME ON UP. RIGHT? SOME QUESTIONS. OKAY. CAN YOU HOLD ON FOR JUST ONE SECOND, KURT? COMMISSIONER RICHARD QUALIFY FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS. WE HAVE TO REDUCE THAT FATALITY. NO WE JUST HAVE TO HAVE THE RESOLUTION. JUST HAVE TO YEAH. SO WE DON'T WE DON'T HAVE TO IMPLEMENT ANY OF THESE DON'T HAVE TO LOWER THE SPEED LIMITS. NOT NECESSARILY. NO, WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THIS STEP NETWORK, WHICH IS INCREASING CREATING SYSTEMS FIRST. THESE ARE MORE GOLD.

THESE ARE ALL OKAY. SO IT'S VERY ASPIRATIONAL. IT IS. IT'S AN ASPIRATIONAL PLAN, AND I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD BE DOING AND WE SHOULD BE CERTAINLY LOOKING AT THEM AND AGAIN. LIKE I SAID, A LOT OF IT IS DIRECTED TOWARDS THE PLANNING SIDE AND OUR PLANNERS, BUT BUT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IF I RECALL, SO THE ROOSEVELT BRIDGE HAS THE SAME WITH LANES AS, UM, AS AN INTERSTATE. UH, AND THEY ACTUALLY KNOW FROM, UM, STUDIES THAT WHEN YOU HAVE WIDER LANES, PEOPLE TRAVEL FASTER. I KNOW THE STATE IS ACTUALLY LOOKING AT REDUCING THE LANE WITH AND I THINK THERE'S ACTUALLY MONEY IN THE ONE OF THE WORK PLANS TO ACTUALLY TO REDUCE THE WENT LANE WITH WHICH IS, BY THE WAY, STRIPING. UM THERE'S ALSO THINGS WHEN CANADA HIGHWAY WAS REDONE TO BE SIX LANES. UM NOW THIS

[03:20:04]

WASN'T A THIS IS NOT A NECESSARY A TRAFFIC SAFETY THING, BUT IT WAS FOR WHY THEY DID IT. BUT IT WILL HELP WITH TRAFFIC SAFETY AS THEY LOWERED THE SPEED LIMIT TO 45 ON CANNER, AND THAT WILL HELP WITH TRAFFIC SAFETY. INTERESTING ENOUGH. THE REASON THEY DID IT. WAS TO THE DECIBELS FROM THE SOUND OF TIRES GOING ACROSS THE PAVEMENT AT 45 MILES AN HOUR VERSUS 50. MILES AN HOUR IS EXPONENTIALLY HIGHER AT 50 MILES AN HOUR THAN 45 MPH. BUT DO YOU GET THE ADDED BENEFIT OF THE SWORD TRAFFIC AND SO, UM SO THERE'S LOTS OF THINGS THAT YOU NEVER THAT I NEVER WHATEVER THOUGHT GOES INTO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. UM AND AGAIN I'M NOT THE EXPERT ON AND WHAT THE PLAN IS. IT'S A LONG PLAN. I'VE READ IT. AH, BACK WHEN WE APPROVED THAT A FEW MONTHS AGO AT THE MPO, UM BUT TRYING TO HIT ALL OF THESE THINGS. ASPIRATIONAL E IS SOMETHING THAT WE DO AND QUITE HONESTLY, A LOT OF THE TRAFFIC PLANNING THAT WE DO HERE IN THE COUNTY HAS DONE BY THE MPO AND A LOT OF THE MAJOR ROADS ARE STATE AND COUNTY ROADS. SO BUT THERE ARE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN THAT YOU THOUGHT WOULD BE ESPECIALLY SUITABLE FOR THE TOP OF MY HEAD, BUT, UM BUT I'M SURE THERE IS SO THE IDEA IS CLEARLY ARTICULATING OUR GOALS. SO WE HAVE SOMETHING TO PARTNER WITH GRANTS, GRANTS AND GETTING AND REDUCING, AND HOWEVER WE CAN GO ABOUT REDUCING TRAFFIC DUSTS AND INJURIES. AND SOME OF THAT IS LAW ENFORCEMENT. WE HAD LAW ENFORCEMENT AT THE MPO MEETING TO DISCUSS HOW THEY CAN ASSIST. AND AS YOU HAVE SEEN, WE'VE SEEN A STEPPED UP ENFORCEMENT ON THE ROOSEVELT BRIDGE. AND I SAW THAT THEY RECENTLY UH THEY RECENTLY GAVE SOMEONE A TICKET FOR DOING 80 MILES AN HOUR OR SO POLICE DEPARTMENT ACROSS THE BRIDGE AND MR DASH ANY IDEA HOW MUCH THE TICKETS AND THE COST OF PERSON THERE'S MAXIMUM 505 $100, AND THEY HAVE TO DO THE APPEARANCE TO HAVE TO GO TO COURT APPEARANCE ONE WAY. ONE ASKED ME SO YEAH, WILD MAN, MR MILLER, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND WE HAVE A SECOND ANY OTHER ANY OTHER DELIBERATION AND WE HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT OCCURRED. OKAY? THANK YOU FOR HEARING ME COMMISSIONERS. THIS. IT COMES REAL CLOSE TO MY HEART. WHAT'S GOING ON THAT ACCIDENT YOU MENTIONED THERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF BRIDGE 18 YEAR OLD KID THAT WIPED OUT TO PEOPLE AT MY AGE FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.

TRAVELING OVER 100 MILES AN HOUR . 1989 MY 18 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WAS KILLED IN FRONT OF THEM ALL.

BY SOMEBODY WHO HEARD IT AT A INTERSECTION. AND 2000. I WAS HIT AT COLORADO OF NUMEROUS ONE BY A 16 YEAR OLD KID. I ALWAYS HAVE MY MOTORCYCLE. THERE'S JUST TOO MUCH STUFF THAT'S GOING ON IN THIS TOWN. AS FAR AS THE WAY PEOPLE DRIVE HOW FAST THEY DIVE US WHEN YOU ALL KNOW WHERE I LIVE US ONE IS LIKE A DRAG STRIP, ESPECIALLY ON FRIDAY NIGHT SATURDAY NIGHT. IT'S JUST A ROAR OF CARS COMING AND GOING AND GOING ON CRAZY RACING EACH OTHER. SOMEBODY HAS TO PUT THE BRAKES ON THIS. AND. NOT SURE WE'LL HAVE TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY, A STATE HIGHWAY OR WHETHER JOE CAN HANDLE IT OR WHO CAN TAKE CARE OF THIS, BUT WE REALLY NEED ENFORCEMENT. IN OUR CITY. SO WE DON'T HAVE TRAGEDIES LIKE I'VE SUFFERED ANOTHER PEOPLE HAVE THANK YOU SO SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS. YES KIND OF TO THE POINT. WHEN WE DID THE MPO. WE HAD ALL THE STUDIES. THEY SHOWED US ONE OF THE HIGHEST PLACES FOR SERIOUS TRAFFIC INJURIES WAS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BRIDGES. UM AND I AND I BELIEVE THAT'S PROBABLY FROM PEOPLE'S SPEEDING DOWN THE BRIDGES. AND SO WE HAVE EMOTIONAL SECOND ANY ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT. MARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL? MAYOR MCDONALD.

YES, COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES, RICH. YES, COLLINS. SO, OKAY, SR 3.5 HOURS. WHY DON'T WE TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK? YES MINUTES, FIVE MINUTES. WE'LL BE BACK AT 7 30, NO MATTER WHAT, OKAY? I WAS GONNA GO TO BATHROOM JUST HAD THAT PROBLEM TO HAVE.

[03:30:18]

OH, THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE HERE WAITING. I WANT TO GET TO THEIR ITEMS. ABSOLUTELY, UM OKAY, SO.

[19. MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE JOHNSON HONDA CPUD (QUASI-JUDICIAL)(RC): ORDINANCE No. 2504-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) FOR A 5.83-ACRE PROPERTY OWNED BY TURQUOISE MOON LLC AT 4200 SOUTHEAST FEDERAL HIGHWAY; SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED; ESTABLISHING MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING JOHNSON HONDA AUTOMOBILE DELEARSHIP CPUD TO ADD TWO (2) PARKING GARAGES; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS AND CONDITIONS; DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

[03:30:27]

WE ARE IN ITEM NUMBER 19 MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE JOHNSON PANDA. UH, CPU, D, UM. MIKE, WOULD YOU READ THE TITLE OF THE AGENDA ITEM? I WILL. IT'S A ORDINANCE NUMBER 2504-20 TO 2. NORTON'S OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. FOR A 5.83 ACRE PROPERTY OWNED BY TURQUOISE MOON LLC AT 4200 SOUTHEAST FEDERAL HIGHWAY. SUDDENLY AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A TAD ESTABLISHING MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING JOHNSON, HONDA AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS. CPU D TO ADD TWO PARKING GARAGES, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS AND CONDITIONS, DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, OKAY WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S DISCLOSE ANY EXPERTISE, COMMUNICATIONS AND THEY'RE HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND COMMISSIONER. YOU ARE RICH. NO I HAD NO COMMUNICATIONS WITH ANY PARTIES IN BOTH. MR. MR BROODER? NO, I HOPE NOT. OKAY AND IF EVER RIGHT EVER SPEAKING TO THE MICROPHONE, AND I HAVE NOT HAD ANY EXPERTISE, COMMUNICATIONS, AND I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND, MIKE, WOULD YOU PLACE ANY POTENTIAL WITNESSES UNDER OATH? WELL THOSE GIVING TESTIMONY PLEASE RISE. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. I SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH OR TRUTH IN IT, BUT THE TRUTH OF YOU GOD REFLECTED THREE PEOPLE WERE SWORN OKAY. UM BONNIE, ARE YOU HANDLING THIS? YES. IS THERE ANY CHANGES FROM THE LAST MEETING? AND WHEN I WAS GOING TO I WAS GOING TO INTRODUCE MYSELF AND THEN SAY THE PRESENTATION IS OPTIONAL SINCE YOU DID APPROVE IT ON THE FIRST TRADING, BUT I'M HAPPY TO GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION. IT'S A PLEASURE OF THE BOARD. DOES ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE PRESENTATION AGAIN SINCE THERE'S NO CHANGES TO IMPROVE? OKAY SO. WELL WE GOTTA CLOSE TO HEARING OUT FIRST , SO WE'LL GET WE'LL GET ME GET TO THAT PORTION. DOES THE APPLICANT WANT TO PRESENT ANYTHING? OKAY SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND EDDIE NOW I GUESS THERE'S NO REBUTTAL. SO DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NO NO, OKAY, DID THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE HAS NOW ENDED? THE HEARING IS CLOSED. IS THERE ANY FROM THE MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS ITEM? SAYING NONE OKAY SO TIME FOR US TO DELIBERATE AND MAKE MOTIONS WHO WANTS TO MAKE A MOTION APPROVED? SECOND OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER COLLINS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BRUNER ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION? SAYING NOTHING, MARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? COMMISSIONER RICH YES. MAYOR MCDONALD YES, COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES COLLINS. THANK YOU. OKAY NOW WE'RE GONNA GO TO A MAJOR NUMBER 20 MAJOR AMENDMENT

[20. MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE WALLACE VOLVO PUD (QUASI-JUDICIAL)(RC): ORDINANCE No. 2505-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) FOR A 5.78-ACRE PROPERTY OWNED BY WALLACE J 2755 SE FEDERAL HIGHWAY, LLC AT 2675 SE FEDERAL HIGHWAY; SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED; ESTABLISHING MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING PUD TO DEMOLISH ONE SINGLE-STORY BUILDING AND ADD A SHOWROOM WITH OFFICE AND GENERAL STORAGE SPACE, AUTO REPAIR BAYS, OUTDOOR DISPLAY AREA, AND ADDITIONAL PARKING INCLUDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS AND CONDITIONS; DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

TO THE WALLACE VOLVO P U D. THIS IS QUITE THE ADDITIONAL MIKE, WOULD YOU READ THE AGENDA ITEM? HMM. THIS IS. AH ORDINANCE TO 505 AND NORTH OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO A COMMERCIAL P U D FOR A 5.78 ACRE PROPERTY OWNED BY WALLACE J. 2755 SOUTHEAST FEDERAL HIGHWAY LLC. 2675 SOUTHEAST FEDERAL HIGHWAY.

SADLY AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED ESTABLISHING MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING PD TO DEMOLISH ONE SINGLE STORY BUILDING AND AT A SHOWROOM WITH OFFICE AND GENERAL STORAGE SPACE AUTO REPAIR BASE, OUTDOOR DISPLAY AREA AND ADDITIONAL PARKING, INCLUDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS AND CONDITIONS, DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING FOR SOME ABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR OTHER PURPOSES. OKAY THE COMMISSIONER'S COMMISSIONER, CAMP A RICH, DO YOU HAVE ANY, UH, EXPERT TAKING HAD NO COMMUNICATION WITH ANY OF THE PARTIES INVOLVED, MR CALLEN. COMMISSIONER BRUNER. NO I WAS JUST WONDERING HOW FAR IT WILL BE BEFORE THE CAR CAN DRIVE ME AROUND. I THINK THAT'S A QUESTION. I HAVE TO BE IN THE FRONT SEAT. OKAY, SO AND I HAVE NO EXPERTISE. COMMUNICATIONS MR . MARTEL, WOULD YOU PLACE? UH ANY OF THE POTENTIAL WITNESSES UNDER OATH? THREE AGAIN. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH OR TRUTH BUT THE TRUTH, SO IF YOU GOT YES, SIR. THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THREE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SWORN OKAY. MS LANDRY. ARE YOU GONNA BE DOING THIS ONE AGAIN? YES, ANY CHANGES. NO. SO I WOULD OFFER THE PRESENTATION OR SINCE YOU HAVE ALREADY APPROVED ON

[03:35:07]

FRUSTRATING NOTHING'S CHANGED. SO IT'S PLEASURE. THE COMMISSION WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO SEE THE PRESENTATION. I DO HAVE A COMMENT ON THIS ONE. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GO THROUGH THIS? NO OKAY, SO MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE, BUT I WANT TO. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT A LITTLE BIT.

OKAY, UM WE'LL GET TO THAT. JUST ONE SECOND. YOU HAVE, UM THEY DON'T. SO YOU HAVE NO PRESENTATION. TERRY, DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION? WE DO NOT HAPPY TO LISTEN ANY KIND AND COMMISSIONER COLLEGE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? YES. SO IF YOU BONNIE, IF YOU WOULD THROW UP THE SITE PLAN SLIDE. IN THINKING ABOUT THIS, UM, PROJECT. THE ONE THING THAT WAS SORT OF HAUNTING ME WAS THE AMOUNT OF ASPHALT THAT IS GOING TO BE ON THAT SITE. UM VERSUS WHAT'S THERE NOW WHERE THERE'S A LOT OF GRASS AND THE MAIN AREA WHERE I FELT LIKE THERE WAS OPPORTUNITY IS IF YOU LOOK AT THIS THE PARKING LOT THERE THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE SERVICE BUILDING. UH I FELT LIKE THAT IS SUCH A GREAT OPPORTUNITY FOR EITHER LIKED. OBVIOUSLY YOU WANT TO HAVE EVERYTHING UP FRONT, YOU KNOW, BE BEAUTIFUL WITH YOUR BRUSHED CONCRETE AND EVERYTHING BUT BACK THERE, UM, ADJACENT TO THE SERVICE, SO. SO IF YOU GO SOUTH FROM THERE, BONNIE WITH THE MOUSE RIGHT A LITTLE BIT MORE. RIGHT THAT PARKING LOT DOWN THERE THAT SQUARE SQUARE.

IF I READ THAT PROPERLY WAS 176 FT BY 164 FT, RIGHT. SO WHAT I LIKE IS TO THE RIGHT OF IT. WE HAVE OR THERE'S WHITE. THERE'S ALL GRASS DOWN THERE. BUT OH, THAT PARKING LOT THAT IS BELOW.

THE SERVICE. THERE I THINK THAT IS AN AMAZING OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE SOME KIND OF MORE PERMEABILITY SURFACED AND JUST ASPHALT. SO IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A PARKING LOT THAT MAYBE HAS PAVERS OR SOME SORT OF PERMEABLE CONCRETE OR PERVIOUS PAVEMENT OR EVEN I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS I KNOW THIS IS NOT MY ROLE TO RECOMMEND WHAT GOES THERE, BUT SOMETHING MORE PRIMARY ABLE, POTENTIALLY EVEN LIKE GRASS PAVERS OR SOMETHING, BECAUSE IT'S GRASS RIGHT NEXT TO THAT. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S INAPPROPRIATE TRANSITION, BUT UH , WITH THE AMOUNT OF ASPHALT THAT'S BEING ADDED ONTO THE SIDE. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT THAT INSTEAD BE SOMETHING MORE.

PERVIOUS SOMETHING THAT CAN DRAIN BETTER THAN JUST ASPHALT. I WAS GOING TO BE MY RECOMMENDATION THERE. OKAY YOU'D LIKE ME TO RESPOND, AND WE HAVE TO DO THAT. SCOTT MONTGOMERY, ENGINEER FOR THE PROJECT. AND ACTUALLY THAT. WE ARE JUST OVER 50% IMPERVIOUS NOW. WE'RE NOT TO BE TOO ZONING. BEFORE. P U D HOWEVER. WE'RE WELL BELOW THAT CAP. IMPERVIOUSNESS. I UNDERSTAND. THE WHAT? YOU DON'T HAVE THE BENEFIT OF SEEING AS THE ORIGINAL PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED TO US BY VOLVO. EXTENT OF PARKING THAT THEY WOULD LIKE AND MUCH OF WHAT YOU SAW. IN THAT PLAN. THIS GRASS AREA WAS PROPOSED AS PAY PARKING. AND MR WALLACE DIRECTLY DIRECTED US TO SCALE THAT BACK TO WHAT YOU SEE NOW. SO IT IS. IT IS. WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS STANDARD PAY TYPE OF PAVEMENT. BUT IT HAS BEEN SCALED BACK SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THE INITIAL PROPOSAL. UM I'D RATHER NOT. COMMIT TO IT AT THIS POINT, BUT WE WOULD BE MOTIVATED NOW OR LATER TO CONSIDER THIS. WE APPROACHED THAT CAPITAL 65. IF THEY WANT TO CONTINUE TO CREATE ADDITIONAL PARKING THEY WOULD NEED TO CONSIDER THE PERVIOUS TYPE OF A PAVEMENT. IT WOULD COME WITH A 50% CREDIT. AGAINST HIM PURPOSE. SO I DON'T THINK WE'RE WE'RE IN AN AREA THAT'S BEHIND THE BUILDINGS. YOU'RE REFERRING TO IT'S NOT AS VISIBLE FROM THE HIGHWAY, RIGHT SO I WOULD LIKE TO JUST SAY WE WOULD CERTAINLY CONSIDER IT. FURTHER LONG TERM. BUT GOING FORWARD IN THAT GRASSY AREA YOU'RE SAYING NOT IN THAT PARKING LOT THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING. RIGHT. IT'S IF WE EXPAND MORE IN THE FUTURE. THAT WOULD NEED TO BE A CONSIDERATION FOR SURE. DO ANY OF ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO, THAT WAS MY OKAY. DO EVERY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS. OKAY I'LL GO AHEAD AND, UH, CLOSED THE CLOSED THE EVIDENCE THE HEARING BECAUSE THE PRESENTATION OF THE EVIDENCE HAS ENDED, SO I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CLOSE TO HEARING DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? SAYING NONE COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE A DELIBERATION OR MOTION MOTION FOR APPROVAL. DO WE HAVE A 2ND

[03:40:03]

2ND? OKAY WE HAVE EMOTION IN A SECOND, AND HE COMMENT ON THE MOTION. MARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? COMMISSIONER RICH YES. COLLINS YES, COMMISSIONER BRUNER? YES. MCDONALD'S YES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY SO WE'RE MOVING ON TO ITEM 21 DOG WORLD URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE

[21. DOGSWORLD URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE (QUASI-JUDICIAL)(RC) (THIS IS A SINGLE READING ITEM) RESOLUTION No. 73-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, CONSIDERING A MAJOR URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO JUSTIN PHILLIPS, (CONTRACT PURCHASER) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 SW 7TH STREET, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.62 ACRES; TO ALLOW THE USE OF KENNELS FOR DOGSWORLD; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR A TIMETABLE OF DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

. I DON'T THINK THIS ONE IS GOING TO GO AS FAST AS THOSE TWO DID. SO THIS ONE IS PLEASURE, JUDICIAL. RESOLUTION NUMBER 73-202 TO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, CONSIDERING A MAJOR URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO JUSTIN PHILLIPS, WHO IS THE CONTRACT PURCHASER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400, SOUTH WEST SEVENTH STREET, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1.62 ACRES TO ALLOW THE USE OF KENNELS. FOR DOGS WORLD PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DAY PROVIDING FOR A TIMETABLE OF DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, AND THE MAYOR IS CORRECT AND STATING THAT IT'S A QUESTION JUDICIAL MATTER. NORMALLY THOSE ARE ORDINANCES, WHICH ARE TWO READINGS, BUT THIS IS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE SIERRA AND AS A RESULT OF FALLS UNDER A RESOLUTION, AND IT'S A ONE READING. OKAY, UH, COMMISSIONERS. DO ANY OF YOU HAVE EXPERT TAKING ANY EXPERT, A COMMUNICATION COMMISSIONER RICHD MAX TUCKEY. REMEMBER THE DATA WAS. IT WAS ONE WEEK PRIOR TO WHEN THIS WAS FIRST SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE AGENDA. AND THEN I SPOKE WITH TRACY, MISS BARNES.

LAST WEEK. SHE WANTED TO HAND ME THE PACKET THAT WAS PROVIDED ALL OF THE TWO OTHER COMMISSIONERS VIA EMAIL. MR COLLINS SPOKEN WITH RESIDENTS AND I SPOKE WITH MS BARNES YESTERDAY AND SHE PAST THAT PACKET ALONG AS WELL TO ME. CRYSTAL GRINER SPOKEN WITH BOTH SIDES. OKAY I'VE SPOKEN WITH SEVERAL RESIDENTS. MISS BARNES, KURT AND HIS WIFE. UM THERE WAS A COUPLE OTHER PEOPLE AT THE MEETING. I JUST CAN'T REMEMBER THEIR NAMES RIGHT NOW. AND, UH, RECEIVED THE PACKAGE FROM HIS BARNES A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO, ALSO SPOKE WITH MR MCCARTHY AND WITH MR SCHROTH, UH, AND STAFF AS WELL AND I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. OKAY MIKE, WOULD YOU SWEAR IN THE WITNESSES? I'M SORRY. YOU MEAN I DID MEET WITH MR SCHWARTZ AS WELL AND THE APPLICANTS? OKAY? YEAH. IF ANY OF THOSE BEING SWORN IF YOU COULD PLEASE RISE. 123. WITH WHAT HAS YOU MOVING AROUND TO MAKE SURE 12 345678 9 10. AND THE RECORD REFLECT 10 PEOPLE BEING SWORN. DO YOU SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD. YOU JUST GET TO THE ONE PERSON THAT THEY'RE YES. DID YOU SAY YES TO GREAT? UM EVERYBODY BACK, EVERYBODY TESTIFIED AFFIRMATIVELY. OKAY SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE HONEY, ARE YOU HANDLING THIS ONE AS WELL? I AM SO I'LL INTRODUCE MYSELF. MY NAME IS BONNIE LANDRY . I AM A PLANNING CONSULTANT. UH WORKING WITH THE CITY OF STEWART. AND I'M GOING TO PROVIDE THIS PRESENTATION, WHICH IS A COMBINATION OF MY PRESENTATION, FOLLOWED BY A PRESENTATION FROM THE APPLICANT.

UM AS STATED, THIS IS RESOLUTION 73 2022 FOR DOGS. WORLD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. THE REQUEST IS TO GRANT A MAJOR URBAN CODE CONDITIONAL USE TO DEVELOP A DOG DAYCARE AND BOARDING SERVICES AND THE B THREE ZONING DISTRICT. UH THE ILLUSTRATION OF. ON THE SCREEN SHOWS THE LOCATION, WHICH IS ON 1.62 ACRES. UM, IT'S IN A VACANT BUILDING, WHICH WAS FORMERLY OCCUPIED BY THE CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. AS STATED. THE ZONING IS B THREE. FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN. AS REQUIRED FOR THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT PROVIDED PUBLIC NOTICE IN A COMBINATION OF A SIGN ON THE PROPERTY AND NOTICES TO AH! RESIDENTS WITHIN 300 FT OF THE PROPERTY, AND I DO WANT TO STATE THAT THEY DID RE ADVERTISED BECAUSE THE FIRST MEETING WAS SO FAR APART FROM THE SECOND SO THEY DID RE ADVERTISE AT THEIR EXPENSE. DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED PROPOSED USE ITS OVERNIGHT LODGING, DAYCARE, BASIC GROOMING , AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO OUTDOOR DOG PARKS, ONE ON THE EAST SIDE WITH 20 123 100 SQUARE FEET AND ONE ON THE WEST SIDE FOR 6700 AND 50. FT. SITE PLAN AS YOU SEE, UM AND IT'S AN EXISTING BUILDING. THEY DID

[03:45:02]

PROVIDE A FLOOR PLAN. IT'S PROBABLY DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO SAY THIS, BUT IT WAS IN YOUR PACKETS AS WELL. TO SHOW WHERE THE DOGS WILL BE HOUSED INDOORS. THE APPLICANT HAD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, UM, WHICH WAS RECOMMENDED AT THE PRE APPLICATION. THAT MEETING WAS HELD MAY 18TH UM THERE WERE FOUR MAIN CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY THOSE WHO ATTENDED TRAFFIC, NOISE, ODOR AND HOURS OF OPERATION. THE APPLICANT HAS MADE AN ATTEMPT TO MITIGATE THESE CONCERNS. UM, THE FIRST NOISE STUDY WAS COMPLETED AUGUST 25TH. UM THIS WAS A AND I'LL HAVE MORE DETAILS ON THE NEXT SLIDE, BUT THIS WAS MADE MODEL STUDY. UM THEY ALSO UPDATED THE NOISE STUDYING NOVEMBER 1ST ON A LIVE LOCATION AT THEIR JUPITER HOT FACILITY. THEY ALSO PROVIDED NARRATIVE OF HOW THEY'RE GOING TO MANAGE THE WASTE. SO THESE ARE NOISE STUDIES. THE FIRST ONE YOU'LL SEE IS JUST A MODELING THAT IS DONE BY A SOUND EXPERT. UM THIS , THIS FIRST STUDY SHOWED THAT THEY WERE WITHIN THE NOISE CONCERN, AND THEY MODELED IT ON FIVE DOGS AND EACH PARK. THE SECOND NOISE STUDY WAS PERFORMED. I BELIEVE IT WAS IN I THINK IT WAS OCTOBER. AND THEY ACTUALLY WENT ON SITE AT THE JUPITER LOCATION TO SEE TO MODEL NOT MODEL, BUT TO SEE LIVE WHAT THE SOUND WOULD BE. THEY ALSO HAVE HIRED AN EXPERT, WHICH I'LL TALK MORE ABOUT WHO LOOKS AT HOW A FACILITY IS MANAGED. TO UM TO BASICALLY LOOK AT THE OBSERVE THE ANIMALS TO SEE IF THEY'RE IN DISTRESS BEFORE THAT FIRST PART HAS HAPPENED. SO THEIR PHILOSOPHY IS LET'S YOU KNOW, LET'S LET'S REMOVE THE DOG FROM THE SITUATION BEFORE THERE IS AN ISSUE AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE PICTURE ON THE LEFT AND THE PICTURE ON THE RIGHT, YOU CAN SEE IT. HUGE DIFFERENCE IN THE BODY LANGUAGE OF THAT DOG. THE SAME DOG, SO OBVIOUSLY THE ONE ON THE RIGHT IS UNDER STRESS.

AND THE ONE ON THE LEFT IS AH! RELAXED. AS STATED. THEY HAVE A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

THEY'RE GOING TO BAG THE WASTE IMMEDIATELY. THEY REGULARLY EMPTY THE DOG WASTE RECEPTACLES . THEY RELOCATE THE WAIST TO THE DUMPSTER EVERY NIGHT, AND THEY DEODORIZE AND DISINFECT THE OUTDOOR PARKS TWICE DAILY. THEIR HOURS OF OPERATION ARE MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. SEVEN A.M. TILL SEVEN PM. WEEKENDS OUTDOOR AREAS , OR EIGHT A.M. TO THREE P.M. AND THEIR LAST WALK FOR OVERNIGHT DOGS IS SEVEN P.M. TILL EIGHT. THAT IS INCORRECT. SEVEN SHOULD BE SEVEN PM UNTIL EIGHT PM THAT'S A MISTAKE. OKAY SO I DID WANT TO STATE FOR THE RECORD. THE CRB, UM, MET IN SEPTEMBER, THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE DISCUSSED AT THAT MEETING. THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL HAVE CHANGED SINCE THAT MEETING AND TO BE MORE SPECIFIC. UM, THERE. THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WERE BASED ON THAT FIRST NOISE STUDY, WHICH WAS A MODELING EXERCISE AND NOT ON LIVE DOGS. AND AT THE TIME THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WAS TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF DOGS TO FIVE ON THE SMALL PARK AND FIVE IN THE LARGE PARK BECAUSE THAT WAS BASED ON THE MODELING THAT THEY DID WERE FIVE DOGS. UM WE, THEY ALSO RECOMMENDED A CONCRETE WALL ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PARK, WHICH THEY HAVE CHANGED THEIR SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE THEY ALSO RECOMMENDED AND THIS IS A CRB. I'M STILL TALKING ABOUT DRAINAGE AREA SYSTEM SIMILAR TO THE ONE OF THE DOG PARK NORTH OF THE BRIDGE NEAR NORTH OVER SHORE'S THEY HAVE AGREED TO MODIFY TO PROVIDE THOSE THAT TYPE OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THEIR FINAL SITE PLAN.

AND THEY ALSO ASKED THE OWNERS TO ENCOURAGE THE DOG OWNERS TO DROP OFF AND PICK OFF THE PICK UP THEIR DOGS. VIZ COLORADO AVENUE, BUT I THINK, AS THE ATTORNEY HAD STATED, WE REALLY CAN'T MAKE THAT A CONDITION OF APPROVAL BECAUSE THESE ARE PUBLIC ROADWAYS, SO YOU CAN'T REALLY TELL PEOPLE HOW TO DRIVE. AM I RIGHT? IS THAT IS THAT DRIVE, BUT I DON'T THINK WE CAN MAKE IT A CONDITION OF LISTEN, BUT WE CAN'T MAKE THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL. WE CAN JUST HAVE THE OWNERS OF THE FACILITY, ENCOURAGE THEM TO DO THAT. BUT IT CAN'T BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. ONE OF THE REASONS WHY IS THAT THE OWNER OF THE FACILITY DOESN'T CONTROL THOSE PEOPLE USING THE ROADS. OKAY COMMISSIONER COLLEGE. SO, UH, IN TERMS OF CRB APPROVAL. I WAS AT THAT MEETING AND FROM WHAT I WAS WHAT I OBSERVED THE CRB DID NOT APPROVE IT BECAUSE IT WAS NOT NOT ENOUGH. OF THE CRB PRESENT. IT WASN'T A SUPERMAJORITY. YOU'RE RIGHT, BUT I THOUGHT THAT

[03:50:03]

MIKE SAID THEY COULD STILL MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION SO I WILL LET THE LAWYER EXPLAIN THE L P A.

DID NOT HAVE. I'M SORRY. THE CRB DID NOT HAVE A FULL BOARD, SO I BELIEVE IT WAS SEVEN PEOPLE ON THE BOARD AND THAT THE DAY OF THE HEARING THERE WAS THREE PEOPLE PRESENT CORN RESULT THEY HAD QUORUM AND HAD TO HEARING AND TWO OF THE THREE VOTED YES, BUT TECHNICALLY, IT WOULD TAKE FOUR. SO EVEN IF ALL THREE HAD VOTED YES, IT WOULDN'T HAVE QUALIFIED AS A OKAY AS A BUT THEY'RE AN ADVISORY BOARD SO THEY DON'T PROVE ANYTHING ANYWAY. SO IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER THEY APPROVED IT BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY GRANT ANY PROPERTY RIGHTS TO ANYBODY.

YEAH, 11 HAD TO ABSTAIN BECAUSE THEY HAD A BUSINESS INTEREST IN THE PROJECT. SCHRUFF HAS SO THERE WERE FOUR PEOPLE THERE. BUT ONE HAD ABSTAINED. CORRECT SO, YEAH, AS AS THE ATTORNEY MENTIONED. IT IS ADVISORY SO THERE, YOU KNOW THEY DON'T REALLY HAVE ANY FINAL SAY SO IT'S IN THE HANDS OF THE COMMISSION. UM SO THAT MR MAYOR MASKING QUESTION, OK, ACTUALLY, IF WE CAN WAIT, LET HER FINISH THE PRESENTATION. UM BECAUSE THERE'S ACTUALLY WE'D BETTER GET THROUGH AND THEN WE'LL GET TO THE QUESTIONS IF WE CAN BE BEST. OKAY? OKAY SO CONTINUE. YES YES . SO ALSO WHAT? I WANTED TO STATE. UM SINCE THE CRB MEETING , I WANTED TO STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT THE APPLICANT HAS WORKED WITH ME LITERALLY SINCE THE APPLICATION WAS PUT IN TO TRY TO ADDRESS THOSE IMPACTS. AND YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR MORE INFORMATION ON THIS, BUT THEY DID HIRE EXPERT AND ANIMAL CARE BUILDING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING. HOW THEY CONTROL NOISE AND HOW THEY MANAGE THE SITE, AND I THINK YOU'LL HEAR FROM THAT EXPERT. UM SO THE PART OF THE STUDY THAT OR THE REPORT THAT THIS EXPERT PROVIDED IS HOW KENNEL DESIGN MANAGEMENT AND OVERALL PHILOSOPHY HAS SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED FROM, YOU KNOW, 20 YEARS AGO, WHEN YOU HAD THE INDOOR OUTDOOR RUNS AT, YOU KNOW, AH, WHAT I WANT TO SAY. JUST YEAH, JUST FENCED IN WHERE THEY COULD COME IN AND OUT AS THEY WILL. UM THAT'S NOT HOW THEY'RE DESIGNED ANYMORE.

THEY'RE VERY WELL MANAGED, AND THE PEOPLE THAT MANAGE THEM ARE TRAINED AND CERTIFIED. UM SO AS I HAD STAYED IN THE PREVIOUS SLIDE, THE INDUSTRY STANDARD TODAY IS TO IDENTIFY ANY STRESS IN THE DOG AND REDIRECT OR REMOVE THAT DOG FROM THE PLAY AREA BEFORE THE FIRST BARK. SO THE RECOMMENDATION HAS SHIFTED FROM HOW THE HOW THE FACILITY IS MANAGED VERSUS THE FOCUS ON THE FIRST NOISE STUDY, WHICH WAS A MODELING AND NOT ALL ALIVE, NOT ON LIFE DOGS. AH ALSO INCLUDED IN REPORT. UM EACH DOG SO THIS IS A PRIVATE FACILITY. EACH DOG IS EVALUATED TO SEE IF THEY FIT IN WITH THE GROUP AND TO SEE WHICH GROUP THEY FIT IN WITH. IF THEY DON'T FIT INTO ANY GROUP, THEN THEY'RE NOT. THEY'RE NOT APPROVED AS A CLIENT, OKAY? UM. AND I THINK THAT'S ALL I HAD TO SAY ABOUT THAT. SO LET ME MOVE ON TO HOW THE NEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MITIGATE THE CONDUCT CONCERNS. UM AS STATED THE AREA WILL BE A SIX FT HIGH CONCRETE WALL WITH LANDSCAPING. IT'S NOT OFFENSE ANYMORE HOURS OF OPERATION AND THIS IS A SUMMARY OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. I COULD LIST THEM LATER, IF YOU'D LIKE. THIS IS A SUMMARY OF THEM THE NUMBER OF DOGS AND THE OUTDOOR EXERCISE AREA IS BASED ON THE INDUSTRY. STANDARD INDUSTRY STANDARD IS BASED ON SQUARE FOOTAGE. DEPENDING ON IF IT'S A SMALL DOG OR A LARGE DOG. SO FOR SMALL DOGS, THEY MUST HAVE 40 SQUARE FEET PER DOG. SO BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE RUN THEIR LIMITED TO HOW MANY DOGS FIT AND IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT THEY HAVE SAID, AND IN LARGE DOGS. IT'S 100 SQUARE FEET PER DOG, ALSO AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. THEY NEED TO HAVE ADOPT IN THEIR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, FEAR FREE STANDARDS. OR SIMILAR, OR YOU KNOW, BUT THAT IS ONE OF THE CERTIFICATIONS AND THEIR STAFF HAS TO HAVE THAT CERTIFICATION, AND THE APPLICANT HAS STATED THAT ALL OF THEIR STAFF IS CERTIFIED IN THIS. THIS PHILOSOPHY OF HOW TO HOW TO MANAGE A FACILITY. AND THAT'S THE LAST OF MY SLIDES. THERE IS AN APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO SEE THAT NOW OR YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ME. COMMISSIONER RICH ASKED HIS QUESTION NOW. WELL. I WANTED TO ASK YOU BECAUSE COMMISSIONER COLLINS WAS ASKING ABOUT THE CRB MEETING, WHICH I ATTENDED, ALSO AND I ACTUALLY WATCHED IT TODAY. ONLINE THAT THEY WERE VERY

[03:55:07]

SPECIFIC. AND, UM WHEN THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, AND AARON ASKED THEM. ARE YOU SAYING FIVE DOGS IN EACH AREA OR 10? AND THEY SAID, OH, NO, NO, NO. FIVE SO COULD YOU GO BACK TO THE END OF THE INDUSTRY STANDARD WOULD INDICATE HOW MANY DOGS WILL BE IN THOSE AREAS NOW. I BELIEVE IF I WONDER IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY , IT IS. YOU KNOW WHAT? I DON'T WANT TO GUESS. I BUT I KNOW THAT THEY HAVE DONE THAT CALCULATION WHEN THEY DO THEIR PRESENTATION TO SAY IT'S MORE THAN FIVE.

DEFINITELY MORE THAN FIVE. DEFINITELY MORE THAN FIVE. MM HMM. YOU KNOW IT WAS SPOKEN, SAID EARLIER THIS EVENING THAT WE SUPPORT SHOULD SUPPORT STAFF. I THINK WE SHOULD SUPPORT THOSE BODIES THAT MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO US. THIS FEELS LIKE A BIT OF A BAIT AND SWITCH TO ME. AND THEY WERE VERY SPECIFIC AND NOT WANTING MORE THAN FIVE. AND I WILL PICK CLOSE ATTENTION TO THAT RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CRB. OKAY UM, AND BODY AREA ALL THROUGH WITH YOUR I AM THROUGH.

TERRY ARE YOU GOING TO DO YOUR PRESENTATION? WELL I'M GOING TO MAKE A PRESENTATION. I'M NOT GOING TO DO THIS, UM. TERRY MCCARTHY. FOR THE RECORD. I GOT INVOLVED WITH THIS AFTER THE CRB. HEARING. WHEN I GOT INVOLVED IN IT, THE CLIENT GAVE ME THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PRESENTED. AND WHAT CAUGHT MY EYE WAS ALL OF THESE SOUNDS STUDIES. I HAVE A LITTLE BACKGROUND IN THIS IN THAT I'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LOCAL HUMANE SOCIETY FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. SO I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE RUNNING OF THE SHELTER. AND THE CONCEPT. THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE A LOT OF NOISE FROM DOGS. I KNOW FROM THE HUMAN SOCIETY. IS BAD FOR DOGS. IT CAUSES STRESS ANXIETY, ETCETERA. IT'S NOT GOOD . SO IF YOU'RE GOING TO RUN ONE OF THESE PLACES, YOU'VE GOT A LOT OF DOGS BARKING. YOU'RE GONNA BE OUT OF BUSINESS. UM I SPOKE WITH JUSTIN THE APPLICANT AND SUGGESTING THE FIRST THING YOU HAVE TO DO HERE IS YOU'VE GOT TO GET AN EXPERT AN EXPERT WITNESS, SOMEONE WHO DOES THIS FOR A LIVING. JUSTIN TOOK MY ADVICE ENGAGED, SCOTT LEARNED SCOTT IS HEADQUARTERED IN THE NORTHEAST, BUT HE WORKS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY. I KNOW WE'RE DOING SOME WORK AT THE AT THE HUMANE SOCIETY TO REVAMP THE FACILITY. WE'VE ENGAGED IN ARCHITECT OUT OF COLORADO. SO THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT DO THIS. AND. JUSTIN ENGAGE SCOTT AND SCOTT HAS COME IN MADE SOME PRESENTATION TO YOUR STAFF, AND THAT WILL BE PART OF THE APPLICANTS PRESENTATION. BUT INITIALLY I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE JUSTIN GET UP AND TELL YOU HIS STORY. IT'S A NICE STORY. JUSTIN IS A RECOVERING LAWYER. HE TOOK A PEEK AT THE LAWN WENT TO THE DOGS. UM BUT HE DOES THIS DOWN IN JUPITER, AND HE'S GOT A REASON TO BE UP HERE, AND HE'S GOT A REASON TO BE HERE TONIGHT. SO WELCOME, JUSTIN. THANKS, MR LANDRY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. UM. CITY ATTORNEY AND MANAGER AND MAYOR. UM MY NAME IS JUSTIN PHILLIPS. I'M THE ONE WHO'S TRYING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY WITH MY BUSINESS PARTNER, KATIE BURGLE. UM AS TERRY TOLD YOU I WAS A LAWYER BY TRAINING IN ORDER TO PAY MY WAY THROUGH LAW SCHOOL. I WAS A DOG WALKER AND DID PET SITTING ON THE SIDE. WHEN I GRADUATED LAW SCHOOL, I PRACTICED LAW FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS, AND THE LONGER I DID IT, THE MORE I REALIZED THAT MY REAL PASSION WAS TAKING CARE OF OTHER PEOPLE'S DOGS. UM THAT I AM A LIFELONG DOG LOVER.

AND THAT IF I CAN FIND A WAY THANKS. IF I CAN FIND A WAY TO DO THAT, AND SERVE COMMUNITY AND A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT WOULD JUST MAKE ME SO HAPPY AND BE SUCH A FULFILLING WAIT FOR ME TO SPEND MY CAREER, SO I RELOCATED FROM NEW YORK CITY AND I CAME DOWN HERE 10 YEARS AGO, AND, UH, ABLE TO OPEN A NEW, BETTER KIND OF PET RESORT. UM SO WE OPENED DOGS WORLD SEVEN YEARS AGO IN JUPITER. UM IT'S AN ENTIRE WORLD DEVOTED TO YOUR BEST FRIEND. WHAT THAT MEANS IS WE'RE A LUXURY PET RESORT, SO WE PROVIDE LUXURY BROKE. BOARDING UM, IT'S NOT THE TRADITIONAL KENNEL OR DOG POUND WITH THE INDOOR OUTDOOR FRONTS THAT WERE MENTIONED EARLIER. IT'S CENTERED AROUND A LOT OF ACTIVITIES FOR YOUR DOGS. A LOT OF SOCIAL PLAY FOR YOUR DOGS IN A SUPERVISED ENVIRONMENT. IT'S COMPLETELY FEAR FREE ON FEAR FREE CERTIFIED. KATIE IS FEAR FREE

[04:00:05]

CERTIFIED. UM OUR STAFF IS HIGHLY TRAINED IN ORDER TO SUPERVISE THE DOGS. UH SAFELY AND QUIETLY, UM, ARE LODGERS GET FIT, LITTLE EXTRAS THAT A LOT OF PLACES DON'T DO. WE GIVE BEDTIME STORIES AND TUCK THEM INTO BED AT EACH NIGHT IN BED BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY LOWERS THEIR STRESS AND THEIR FEAR LEVEL TO HEAR A HUMAN'S VOICE AND TO GET THAT HUMAN CONTACT, SO OUR STAFF SPENDS 3 TO 5 MINUTES IN THE ROOM WITH EACH LARGER AT NIGHT. AND THE STAFF MEMBER READS THEM A STORY WHILE THEY'RE SITTING WITH THEM CHATTING WITH THEM. WE ALSO DO HOMEMADE DOG TREATS. WE DON'T DO CHOCOLATES ON THE PILLOWS BECAUSE THEY'RE DARK, SO THEY GET A DOGGY TREAT ON THEIR PILLOW. UM, WE MAKE HOMEMADE SNACKS IN HOUSE. WE HAVE SPECIAL EVENTS. WE HAVE PARTIES FOR THEIR FOR THEM ALL THE TIME. WE HAVE HOLIDAY DINNERS. WE DO WE DO. THANKSGIVING TURKEY MEAL. WE ALSO HAVE A SUPERIOR LEVEL OF DOGGIE DAYCARE. UM WHAT MAKES IT BETTER IS THAT, UM IN IN FOLLOWING WITH FEAR FREE PRACTICES. WE HAVE SMALL GROUPS . WE KEEP THE STAFF TO DOG RATIO 15 DOGS TO ONE STAFF OR BETTER, MEANING THAT IF A GROUP IN AN AREA AS EVER MORE THAN 15 DOGS, THERE ARE TWO STAFFERS STAFF MEASURE MET. TWO STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT AND A NUMBER OF STAFF BACKUP STAFF AVAILABLE VIA WALKIE TALKIE. UM SMALLER GROUPS ARE SAFER. SMALLER GROUPS ARE QUIETER BECAUSE THE DOGS ARE PROPERLY STIMULATED. THEY'RE NOT OVERSTIMULATED. THEY'RE NOT HIGHLY STRESSED, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT CROWDED. IT. UM THEY'RE NOT BARKING OUT OF STRESS BECAUSE THEY'RE ENGAGED BY A HIGHLY TRAINED STAFF. THEY'RE ALL PRE SCREENED, SO THEY'RE WELL SOCIALIZED DOGS TO BEGIN WITH. THEY ARE ENGAGING IN PLAY AND REST AND PERIODS OF BOTH WITH THE STAFF AND WITH OTHER DOGS. UM WE ALSO OFFER ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES, SO WE OFFER WATER PLAY FEATURES WITH POOLS, SQUIRT GUNS, THINGS LIKE THAT. WE DO AGILITY GAMES WITH THE DOGS. WE OFFER THEM TREAT PUZZLES. WE LIKE TO KEEP THE DOGS MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY STIMULATED, WHICH IS JUST ANOTHER WAY OF MAKING SURE THEY'RE HAPPY. THEY HAVE A FULFILLING TIME AND OUR CLIENTS ARE REALLY HAPPY AT THE END OF THE DAY WHEN THEY PICK UP OUR DOGS. UM THEIR DOGS. WE HAVE A EXCEPTIONAL SPA WHERE WE DO THINGS LIKE PEDICURES, BLUEBERRY FACIALS, BUT BASICALLY MOSTLY WE DO BATHS AND BLOWOUTS AND BRUSH OUT TO THE DOGS LOOK AND SMELL GREAT WHEN THEY GO HOME, UM AND THEY AND THEIR YOU KNOW THEIR THEIR HUMANS LOVE TO SEE HOW THEY'RE FOR KIDS. COME HOME. SO THE REASON WHY WE DO THIS ALL BECAUSE OF MY UNIQUE PET CARE PHILOSOPHY. WHICH IS CALLED THE DOG LIFESTYLE. THE DOG LIFESTYLE , UH, RECOGNIZES THAT OUR DOGS ARE NOT JUST PETS OR ACCESSORIES , BUT FULL FLEDGED FAMILY MEMBERS FOR WHOM WE WANT THE VERY BEST. THERE ARE NO OTHER DOGS, OTHER PETS THAT WE TAKE OUT WITHIN THE WORLD WHERE THAT'S INCLUDED IN OUR LIVES AS MUCH AS DOGS. WE WANT THEM TO LIVE THE HAPPIEST AND MOST ENRICHING LIVES AND WE UNDERSTAND THAT LIKE US, THEY ARE SO EXTREMELY SOCIAL ANIMALS AND WHEN THEY HAVE TO BE APART FROM THEM. UH THEY WE MISS THEM AND KNOW HOW MUCH THEY MISS US. SO OUR MISSION TO DOGS WORLD IS TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR DOG IS HAVING THE MOST FUN FULFILLING TIME IN THE SAFEST ENVIRONMENT POSSIBLE. UM IN ORDER THAT SO OUR DOGS AND OUR CLIENTS CAN LIVE THE DOG LIFESTYLE TO THE FOREST. SO WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO DO IS BRINGING ARE EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL OF CARE AND, UH, EXTREMELY HIGH FULFILLMENT OF BOTH ARE FOR GUESTS AND OUR CLIENTS AND THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE TO HERE IN STUART, BECAUSE WE THINK THERE'S A HUGE DEMAND FOR BUSINESSES LIKE OURS IN THE COMMUNITY. IT'S A I'M SORRY. CAN I TAKE A SIMPLE WATER? I YES. YEAH I'M THINKING REAL MOMENT. YOU'RE FINE. TAKE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UM. AS AS MISS LANDRY SAID. THIS IS A COMMERCIAL AREA ON THREE SIDES OF OUR PROPERTY. UM IT. WE HAVE OFFICES. WE HAVE RETAIL. WE HAVE RESIDENTIAL. WE HAVE HOTEL. WE HAVE HUMAN DAYCARE, AND WE HAVE RESTAURANTS. ALL RIGHT IN THAT AREA, SO WHERE WE FIT IN, REALLY WITH THE COMMERCIAL ASPECTS OF THE AREA WHERE WE'RE GOING ALSO, YOU'D BE BRINGING IN A THRIVING GROWING INDUSTRY WITH HIGH LOCAL DEMAND AND OFFERING TRULY FIVE STAR LUXURY SERVICE. THAT THE COMMUNITY AND CITY OF STEWART DOESN'T YET HAVE. UM. MS LANDRY SPOKE TO THE CHANGES DECIDED TO THE SIDE AND I THINK WE HAVE A SLIDE SHOWING THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE VERY LITTLE DONE TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. WHAT YOU SEE IS THE CONCRETE WALL, WHICH WILL NOT ONLY DAMPEN NOISE COMING FROM THE DOG PARK. IT WILL SHELTER THE DOGS FROM THE NOISE AND VISUAL STIMULI FROM OUTSIDE THE OUTSIDE WORLD. MEANING THEY'RE GOING TO BE MORE STRESS FEED, MEANING THEY'RE GOING TO BE QUIETER AS WELL. WE'VE ALSO

[04:05:05]

AGREED TO A BUNCH OF AESTHETIC THINGS LIKE THE VINES AND A COUPLE OF ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS TO MAKE SURE IT'S TOTALLY COMPORTS WITH THE AESTHETICS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ADDS TO IT.

UM THE SITE PLAN. I'LL JUST QUICKLY REITERATE. OUR BUILDING IS THE BIG RECTANGLE IN THE MIDDLE. THAT'S ROLL ALL THE INDOOR PLAY. ALL ALL THE HOUSING OF THE DOGS WILL BE OVERNIGHT.

THE RECTANGLE ON THE LEFT WILL BE OUR OUT. OUR MAY ARE LARGE OUTSIDE DOG PARK WITH A SIX FT CONCRETE BLOCK WALL AROUND IT. IT'LL BE ARTIFICIALLY TURFED, CLEAN AND SANITIZED REGULARLY. A SMALL DOG DOG PARK IS AT THE OTHER END OF THE BUILDING. UM. NEXT SLIDE IS OPERATIONS ABOUT HOURS OPERATIONS. MISS LANDRY REALLY WENT OVER ALL THIS. I'M NOT SURE I HAVE MUCH TO SAY ABOUT THAT UNLESS YOU GUYS HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ME. UM AND AGAIN JUST TO REITERATE, REITERATE, WE DO FEARFULLY FEAR FREE GROUP PLAY, SO OUR GROUP SIZES ARE SMALL. THEREFORE THEY'RE SAFER.

THEREFORE, THEY'RE QUIET. ALL OF OUR STAFF IS TRAINED FOR THREE WEEKS. THEY HAVE TO GET CERTIFICATION THAT THEY UNDERSTAND HOW TO READ THE DOG BODY LANGUAGE AND PREEMPTIVELY ACT BEFORE A DOG GETS HIGHLY STRESSED AND BECOMES HIGHLY VOCAL. THE NEXT IS ALL OF OUR PRESTIGIOUS AWARDS TO HAVE WON BEST PET RESORT IN PALM BEACH COUNTY. TWO OF THE LAST THREE YEARS WERE NOMINATED AGAIN FOR 2022. WE'VE WON BEST PEP RESORT IN JUPITER. FOR SEVEN STRAIGHT YEARS SINCE 2016 THROUGH 2021. P P. B. C IS OUR CERTIFICATION PROGRAM FOR OUR STAFF ALSO FEAR FREE CERTIFICATION. AS I MENTIONED KATIE AND I ARE BOTH CERTIFIED THAT REMEMBER OF THE BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU WITH AN A PLUS RATING. SO FOR ALL OF THESE REASONS AND MORE WE OH, SORRY.

WE ALSO GIVE BACK TO OUR COMMUNITY. UM OUR LARGEST DONATION DRIVE IS FOR THE UNITED STATES WAR DOGS ASSOCIATION. WE ARE THEIR SINGLE LARGEST DONOR AND HAVE BEEN FOR FOUR STRAIGHT YEARS WE'VE DONATED OVER $40,000 IN ORDER TO HELP FIND FOREVER HOMES FOR RETIRING WAR DOGS. UM THE HANDLERS ARE NEVER ALLOWED TO KEEP THEM WHEN THEY BOTH MATRICULATE OUT OF THE MILITARY . WE ALSO WORK WITH LOCAL HUMANE SOCIETIES AND ANIMAL RESCUES, AND WE DONATE A PORTION OF OUR PROFITS WERE HEAVILY INVESTED IN BEING A POSITIVE FORCE IN THE COMMUNITY. AND THEN, UM. FOR ALL THESE REASONS AND MORE, WE KNOW THAT WE WOULD BE A GREAT FIT WITH MINIMUM IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. BUT I'M AN INTERLOPER AND A FORMER LAWYER FROM NEW YORK SO I THINK BETTER TO SPEAK ABOUT THAT, TO ME WOULD BE MISS BERNALL, WHO WAS BORN AND RAISED HERE. SMART MAN. I'M SURE. THANK YOU, JUSTIN . I'M KATIE. UM AND PROBABLY THE BIGGEST QUESTION YOU GUYS ARE ASKING IS WHY STEWART? WHY SHOULD OUR NEXT LOCATION BE THERE? AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN STUART. I WENT TO BESSIE CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, HIDDEN IN MIDDLE SCHOOL AND GRADUATED FROM MARK COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL. TIGERS UM, WE'RE EXCITED TO ADD THIS LUXURY PET RESORT WHICH OUR TOWN I FEEL IT'S REALLY LACKING. UM MY FRIENDS, MY NEIGHBORS. MY EMPLOYEES ARE CONSTANTLY ASKING ME. EXCUSE ME. WHEN ARE WE GOING TO COME TO STEWART? AND WE ARE A LUXURY ACTIVITY BASIS, JUSTIN SAID. YOU KNOW, WE DO THINGS UNLIKE ALL THE OTHER FACILITIES THAT ARE AROUND, SO IT IS SOMETHING THAT OUR COMMUNITY DESPERATELY NEEDS. UM WE'LL BE ADDING 30 TO 50 NEW JOBS, TOO. PEOPLE MY AGE THAT ARE LOCALS AROUND IN OUR COMMUNITY. UM BUT WE ARE DEEMED IN ESSENTIAL BUSINESS. WE WORKED THROUGH THE PANDEMIC. UM, YOU KNOW, WE HELPED ESPECIALLY WITH JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER, ANY OF THE FRONTLINE WORKERS HELPING TAKE CARE OF THEIR DOGS WHILE THEY WORKED LONG HOURS. UM, AND WE ALSO HAVE SPECIFICALLY CHOSEN THIS BUILDING BECAUSE IT DOES HAVE A FULL BACKUP GENERATOR. IT'S HURRICANE SAFE, SO WE WANT TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE A FACILITY AND SHELTER FOR DOGS AND PEOPLE DO HAVE TO EVACUATE FOR HURRICANE AND MAY ARE ON THE FENCE ABOUT EXCUSE ME ABOUT LEAVING BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO LEAVE THEIR DOGS, SO WE WANT TO MAKE THAT AS AN OPTION FOR IN THE COMMUNITY. SO I HOPE YOU CAN SEE NOW WE ARE AN ESSENTIAL BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND NEXT WEEK, SCOTT LEARNED WHO IS THE PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL ENGINEER OF DESIGN LEARNING INQUIRY. WELCOME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

[04:10:01]

IT'S GREAT TO BE BACK IN FLORIDA. I WAS HERE TWO WEEKS AGO. I'M SCOTT LEARNED. UM I'M PERSONALLY FROM CONNECTICUT, UM , LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN FLORIDA AND 44 OTHER STATES.

WE WORK ALL OVER THE UNITED STATES FOR 30 YEARS. 29 YEARS, ALMOST 30 YEARS WE HAVE BEEN DESIGNING AND ENGINEERING ANIMAL CARE FACILITIES EXCLUSIVELY ANIMAL SHELTERS. KENNELS BOARDING FACILITIES, DAYCARE FACILITIES AND VETERINARY HOSPITALS. WE ALSO FOR THE RECORD, WE DO HAVE AN OFFICE IN PENSACOLA. SO UM, WE HAVE AT LEAST ONE FLORIDIAN ON OUR TEAM.

UM ONE OF THE BIG ISSUES AND I WON'T BEND YOUR EARS TOO LONG. I KNOW IT'S LATE, BUT THINGS HAVE CHANGED DRAMATICALLY IN THE LAST 30 YEARS SINCE I STARTED THIS WHEN I STARTED THIS, WE WERE LOOKING AT BOARDING FACILITIES AND DOG POUNDS WITH INDOOR OUTDOOR RUNS WITH UNSUPERVISED ANIMALS THAT WERE BARKING ALL DAY LONG. THAT IS A VERY BAD SITUATION FOR THE DOGS ALONE, LET ALONE PEOPLE AND CUSTOMERS, AND TODAY WE USE A WHOLE DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHY. ANIMALS ARE SUPERVISED VERY CLOSELY. INDUSTRY STANDARDS ARE NO MORE THAN 10 TO 15 DOGS PER GROUP.

WOULD WANT TO SUPERVISORS YOU SAW PREVIOUSLY BONNIE ILLUSTRATED THE THERE ARE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIZE OF AREAS. 40 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM PER SMALL DOG UP TO 100 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM FOR LARGE DOG. IF YOU DO THE MATH ON THOSE SITUATIONS, YOU WILL KNOW THAT THAT IS, THOSE ARE SMALLER AREAS THAN WHAT JUSTIN HAS FOR THOSE LARGE RECTANGLES. THOSE AREAS WILL BE SUBDIVIDED INTO SMALLER GROUPINGS, AND I'VE SEEN HIS FACILITY IN JUPITER. THAT HAS EXACTLY THAT CONDITION AND THAT IS A CONDITION IN ALL OF OUR BOARDING AND DAY CARE IN SITUATIONS SMALLER AREAS WITH SUPERVISED GROUPS WITH DOGS THAT ARE GROUPED TOGETHER BASED ON SIZE TEMPERAMENT. AND SOMETHING CALLED PLAY STYLE, WHICH IS THE WAY THE DOGS INTERACT TOGETHER.

THE SECOND THING IS REALLY CRITICAL. AND JUSTIN ALLUDED TO THIS IS THE FACT THAT THESE ANIMALS ARE EVALUATED BY OUR CLIENTS BEFORE THEY COME IN. IT'S SIMPLY NOT THE CASE THAT YOU CAN TAKE ANYBODY'S DOG INTO YOUR FACILITY. THAT DOG IS VERY LIKELY TO BE AGGRESSIVE AGGRESSION IS WHAT LEADS AGGRESSION AND WHAT'S CALLED GUARDING WHEN, WHEN A DOG TRIES TO PROTECT A TOY OR PROTECT FOOD . THAT'S WHAT INITIATES BARKING. THAT'S WHAT INITIATES AGGRESSION. SO THESE ANIMALS ARE GROUPED IN SMALLER GROUPS BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THEIR COMPLETELY SUPERVISED IF AN ANIMAL BEGINS TO VOCALIZE, THAT'S NOT EVEN BARKING. THAT'S YELPING BEGINNING TO VOCALIZE. THE DOG IS SEPARATED FROM THE GROUP AND BROUGHT INSIDE TO A TO A HOLDING AREA TIME OUT AREA, WHICH IS ISOLATED FROM THE SPACE. WE DON'T EVEN DESIGNED TIME OUT AREAS ANYMORE IN PROXIMITY TO THE PLAYERS. THEY'RE LITERALLY PHYSICALLY SEPARATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. SO WHEN YOU GO TO ONE OF THESE FACILITIES, AND I'VE SEEN THIS IN PRACTICE AND JUSTIN'S JUPITER FACILITY, A LOT OF DOGS ARE PLAYING AND THERE IS NO BARKING.

AND THE PURPOSE OF THAT IS TO KEEP THE STRESS DOWN TO KEEP THE DOGS HAPPY AND KEEP THEM IN THAT CYCLE OF PLAY AND REST BETWEEN THOSE TWO AREAS AND KEEPING THEM YOU KNOW, IN A STATE THAT THEY ARE NOT BECOMING AGGRESSIVE OR GUARDING. SO THERE'S A LOT OF THOUGHT THAT GOES INTO THIS IS A LOT OF SUPERVISION THAT GOES INTO THIS TODAY. A LOT OF SCIENCE GOES INTO IT. UM FEAR FREE IS A PROGRAM THAT WAS DEVELOPED OR VETERINARIAN NAMED MARTY BECKER. I KNOW I'VE MET MARTY BECKER AND THE WHOLE STRATEGY FOR BOTH DOGS AND CATS, BY THE WAY, WAS TO DEVELOP PROTOCOLS SPECIFICALLY FOR EXCUSE ME FOR ANIMAL CARE FACILITIES. SO THAT ANIMALS WOULD NOT BE STRESSED. AND FINALLY I WANT TO SAY THAT, UM OWNERS DO NOT WANT THEIR PET RETURNED TO THEM IN A STRESSED MANNER. YOU WANT TO DROP? PEOPLE ARE PAYING A LOT OF MONEY FOR THESE ANIMALS TO BE IN A HIGH QUALITY BOARDING OR DAY CARE FACILITY. THEY DON'T EXPECT THE ANIMAL TO COME HOME BEING HIGH, STRONG AND STRESSED AND BARKING AND YIPPING. THAT'S NOT THE GOAL . THE GOAL IS TO KEEP THESE ANIMALS VERY WELL SUPERVISED DURING THE COURSE OF THE DAY AND VERY WELL RESTED. SO IN OUR DESIGN PHILOSOPHY, WHICH STARTS WITH THE FLOOR PLANNING AND SMALLER GROUPINGS AND GOES THROUGH EVERYTHING, INCLUDING PROTOCOLS, STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES AND STAFF TRAINING. THAT'S OUR APPROACH. I DIDN'T. I WILL TELL YOU, UM, YOU KNOW, JUST GIVE JUSTIN KATIE CREDIT FOR CONTACTING US. THIS IS THE KIND OF CLIENT THAT WE WANT.

THEY ARE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THEIR FACILITY. AND IF YOU WERE GOING TO HAVE A

[04:15:06]

DOG FACILITY IN YOUR TOWN. THIS IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF OWNER YOU WANT. NOT SOMEBODY WHO'S YOU KNOW, A MOM AND POP OPERATION. WITH 50 DOGS IN THE GARAGE, AND I'M NOT BEING FACETIOUS OF LITERALLY SEEN THAT KIND OF SITUATION. YOU WANT SOMEBODY WHO IS VERY ATTUNED TO PROPER CARE AND TREATMENT OF DOGS AND HOW THEY WILL REACT. IN THOSE SITUATIONS. SO WITH THAT I WILL.

LEAVE IT TO ANY QUESTIONS HAPPY TO ADDRESS SUNDAY THINKING. DOES ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? MR RICH. YOU PROVIDE. I DID, AND THEY SHOULD BE IN YOUR PACKET. UH UM. NO, I THINK THAT WAS THE ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT. NO, BUT HIS HIS IS IN THERE. IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S ON HIS LETTERHEAD. YES, I'M SORRY. YES, DLR. WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS RELATIVE TO WHAT SORT OF CHEMICALS WOULD BE USED TO DISINFECT? I CAN FOR. IN FACT, THAT'S A BIG PART OF WHAT WE DESIGN BECAUSE WE DO ALL OF THE INTERIOR DESIGN AND PLANNING AS WELL AS THE MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL PLUMBING, FIRE PROTECTION AND NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING. SO WE DO ALL THE BLUEPRINTS INSIDE THE BUILDING, UM, FOR CHEMICAL CONTROL. THERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS ALSO THAT I WANT TO MENTION UM JUSTIN MENTIONED BEGGING WASTE. WE MAY EVEN GO TO A SYSTEM THAT WE USE TODAY FOR WASTE REMOVAL USING FLUSH FIXTURES WHERE WE'RE WASTED, SCOOPED AND FLUSHED. AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE IMMEDIATELY, SO YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE THE ODOR OF BAGGING WAYS FLUSHED. DOWN A JANITOR'S FLUSH. THINK LIKE AN OVERSIZED TOILET, RIGHT? RIGHT GOES INTO THE SEPTIC SYSTEM TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION ABOUT CHEMICALS. THE BEST CHOICES TODAY ARE WHAT ARE CALLED ACCELERATED HYDROGEN PEROXIDE. H P S. THEY USED MEDICAL FACILITIES A LOT.

THEY'RE USED IN ALL OVER AN ANIMAL CARE. THAT ARE QUATERNARY DISINFECTANTS. UM HP S ACT VERY QUICKLY. UM, THEY'RE VERY GOOD AT ODOR CONTROL DISEASE CONTROL ON SURFACES. COUPLE THAT WITH THE HUMIDIFIER CATION CONTROL IN THE BUILDING BECAUSE SPECIFICALLY FOR THE OUTDOORS, SORT OF TURF. RIGHT WHAT KIND OF CHEMICALS DO YOU KNOW WILL BE USED FOR CERTAIN? SO I CAN TELL YOU WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND, AND I'LL LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK TO THE SPECIFICS OUTDOORS. WE DO NOT USE HP OR QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT BECAUSE IT WILL IMPACT THE NATURAL BACTERIAL. UL AND BACTERIA IN THE SOIL SO OUTSIDE WE USE PRODUCTS LIKE UH , THERE ARE A WHOLE LITANY OF PRODUCTS THAT ARE DISINFECTANTS THAT ARE. UM ECO FRIENDLY THE BREAKDOWN IN THE SOIL. AND UM, I'M TRYING TO THINK OF THE NAME OF ONE OF THEM. NOW THEY'RE SOLD BY A COMPANY CALLED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY. IN CALIFORNIA. THAT MAKES THEM JUSTIN. DO YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BE USING? SO THE SANITATION UH, THE DEODORIZING AND, UM, DISINFECTING SYSTEM USES IS COMMERCIALLY KNOWN AS WHISKEY, WASH. IT USES IT ATTACHES TO A HOSE. THERE'S A CAPITAL IT THAT RELEASES THE FACT AND THE DEODORANT INTO THE WATER AND CONTROLLED STREAM. AND YOU HOSE DOWN THE TURF. IT IS THE EXACT SAME CHEMICAL THAT, UH , MUNICIPALITIES USED TO DO WATER TREATMENT WITH SO IT'S 100% ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY BREAKS DOWN ALMOST INSTANTANEOUSLY. AFTER DOING ITS WORK, IT'S BEEN IN USE IN ANIMAL CARE FACILITIES AND IN THE TREATMENT OF WATER FOR 40 50, OR YOU KNOW WHAT CHEMICALS THAT COULD GOOGLE IT IN TWO SECONDS AND GET IT FOR YOU. BUT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. IT'S NO OKAY. BUT I KNOW THAT IT'S 100% ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE THAT IT BREAKS DOWN AND THAT IT'S USED IN WATER TREATMENT AS WELL AS ANIMAL CARE AND VETERINARY FACILITIES AND HAS BEEN USED SAFELY FOR DECADES. FROM WHAT I COULD FIND. IT SEEMED TO BE CHLORINE BASED. IT'S. I DON'T WANT TO GIVE YOU THAT INFORMATION, BUT I THINK IT'S RELATED. IT'S CHLORINE ANALOG, BUT IT'S NOT NECESSARILY CHLORINE, BUT THEY IT IS HAS A SOMEWHAT SIMILAR UM, CHEMICAL MAKEUP IS THE BEST. I CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE AFTERNOON? WITH REGARDS TO THE NUMBER OF

[04:20:02]

DOGS THAT ARE GOING TO BE IN EACH ONE OF THOSE TWO. PADS THERE OUTSIDE. IS THERE SOME SORT OF CONDITIONAL USED THAT THEY WERE LIMITED TO YEAH. YEAH. SO THE TWO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. IS THAT THE NUMBER OF DOGS ARE BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. AS I SAID BEFORE, AND ALSO I DIDN'T HAVE THAT ON MY SUMMARY SLIDE, THE RATIO OF DOG SUPERVISION WILL MEET OR EXCEED INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR ONE PERSON FOR EVERY 10 TO $15 DOGS , WITH A SECOND PERSON AVAILABLE TO REMOVE OVERLY AGGRESSIVE OR STRESS DOGS, SO IT'S 40 SQUARE FEET PER SMALL DOG AND 100 SQUARE FEET FOR EACH LARGE DOG. SO NOW THAT SPECIFIC NUMBER OF DOGS PER AREA. YEAH LET US CLARIFY THAT, AS I MENTIONED BEFORE. ALL THESE DOGS ARE NOT GOING TO BE IN ONE AREA. THERE'S TWO THE OUTSIDE, RIGHT. BUT IF YOU TAKE EITHER ONE OF THOSE TWO RECTANGLES THAT YOU SAW ON THE SITE PLAN. THOSE ARE GOING TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO MULTIPLE, SMALLER ZONES. SO AGAIN, UM IF YOU HAD A SMALL DOG PLAY AREA AND YOU KEPT IT TO 40 DOGS AND YOU WERE GOING TO DO 10 DOGS IN IT. THAT'S 400 SQUARE FEET. THAT'S THE SIZE OF THAT PLAY AREA. SO TO THE QUESTION, WE DON'T HAVE A TECHNICAL. THE CRB DIDN'T RECOMMEND A NUMBER OF DOGS PER AREA, I ONLY ASKED IS THE DID WAS BASED ON FIVE THEY DID SO AND I WANT TO STATE AGAIN FOR THE RECORD THAT THAT WAS BASED ON A MODELING NOISE, STUDY AND NOT ALIVE. NOISE STUDY AND NOT M PRIOR TO THEY'RE CONTRACTING WITH THIS EXPERT, SO THERE THE DOGS WERE LIMITED TO FIVE IN THE SMALL AND FIVE IN THE LARGE AND THAT WAS THE THERAPIES, RECOMMENDATION AND STAFFS AT THE TIME. I. ALSO JUST FOR EVERYONE'S BENEFIT. WE DON'T WANT ONE DOG BARKING INCESSANTLY , LET ALONE FIVE OR 10 OR 50.

IT'S YOU IF YOU HAD FIVE DOGS BARKING INCESSANTLY. YOU ARE NOT SUPERVISING THOSE ANIMALS AND THEY'RE NOT BEING CARED FOR PROPERLY. SO IT THE INDUSTRY WOULD TYPICALLY SAY 10 TO 15 DOGS PER PHYSICAL PLAY YARD. AND THAT'S A PHYSICAL PLAY YARD. THAT MEANS YOU KNOW? WHAT I'M ASKING IS A PART OF WHAT WE'RE ABOUT TO APPROVE, LIMITING THEM TO FIVE AND FIVE IS THAT IS NOT IN MY CURRENT STAFF RECOMMENDATION THAT HAS CHANGED BECAUSE OF THE EXPERT BECAUSE THEY HIRE YOU KNOW, LIKE I SAID , I MET WITH THE APPLICANT MANY TIMES. THAT'S WHY THIS ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED SO MANY TIMES THAT THEY HAD TO RE ADVERTISE. BECAUSE THE CRB MEETING WAS IN SEPTEMBER, AND WE'RE JUST NOW HEARING NOVEMBER SO UM, A LOT HAS CHANGED. THE NOISE STUDY HAS CHANGED. THE NOISE STUDY THEY DID WAS BASED ON LIFE DOGS. IT'S NOT A MODELING. WAS IT WITH THIS WITH A SPECIFIC NUMBER? SPEAK TO THAT COUNCIL MEMBER. SO, UH, WHAT WE DID WAS WE HAD A SOUND ENGINEER COME AND HE SET UP THE SOUND EQUIPMENT DIRECTLY OUTSIDE OUR FACILITY IN JUPITER, ITS CHAIN LINK FENCE. THERE IS NO. SIX FT CONCRETE BARRIER TO PREVENT SOUND FROM COMING INSIDE OR OUTSIDE, AND HE DID A RAW CALCULUS OF OUR NORMAL STANDARD OPERATIONS ARE STANDARD OPERATIONS ARE TO HAVE ONE GROUP IN AN AREA AT A TIME, SO IT'S GOING TO BE AROUND 10 TO 15 DOGS IN AN AREA AT A TIME. BUT I THINK THE LARGEST WE ALSO PUSHED THAT FOR THE SPECIFICS OF THE STUDY, SO THAT WE COULD SORT OF PROVE OUR THESIS, WHICH IS IT'S NOT A FUNCTION OF. IF YOU HAVE MORE DOGS, YOU YOU HAVE MORE BARKING IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT SPACE IF YOU HAVE THE RIGHT PROCEDURES IN PLACE, THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE AN ISSUE. SO THEORETICALLY WHAT WE DO. WHAT WE DO TYPICALLY IS WE WON RUN GROUP IN AN AREA THAT TIME. THAT GROUP IS $15 OR LESS IN THE STUDY. I BELIEVE WHAT WE GOT UP TO ABOUT 22 23 DOGS IN ONE SPACE AT A TIME AND AT NO POINT DURING THE STUDY, WHICH WAS CONDUCTED OVER A WEEK. 24 HOURS A DAY RECORDING SOUND. DID WE EVER EVER GO ABOVE THE NOISE ORDINANCE LEVEL IT IS PRESCRIBED BY THE NOISE ORDINANCE, BUT IT'S JUST A LITTLE BIT NEBULOUS FOR ME BECAUSE IT WENT FROM THAT WHERE THERE WAS FIVE TO SORT OF WE'RE UNDER NOISE ORDINANCE, SO THAT'S WHY I WAS LIKE, OKAY, MAYBE I CAN INTERJECT I JUST BECAUSE YOU REALLY CAN'T SEE THE SLIDE, BUT THE FIRST STUDY WAS DONE ON A MODELING, SO THERE WERE NO LIVE ANIMALS AT ALL THE TABLE ON THE RIGHT WHICH I APOLOGIZE IS VERY SMALL HAS A HAS A RANGE OF DOGS, AND I THINK THE HIGHEST NUMBER THAT THEY STUDIED WAS 54. AND IT WENT DOWN TO SIX. SO OBVIOUSLY THE NUMBERS OF AND THAT'S THE NUMBER OF DOGS PER HOUR. I DON'T WANT TO SAY THAT THAT'S IN, YOU KNOW, IN OUR AT THE TIME, SO IT'S BASED ON HOW MANY DOGS PER HOUR THAT THEY

[04:25:05]

MEASURED AND AT NO TIME DID THEY EXCEED THE NOISE LIMIT. FOR THE YOU KNOW, FOR THE FOUR NIGHTS LET ME ADD TO THE FACT THAT THE CRB UNDER STAFF. DON'T PROCLAIM TO BE EXPERTS IN THIS AREA OF THE OF LANDINGS. THAT'S WHY I SAID. DISCARD TO, UH, JUSTIN, YOU GOTTA GET AN EXPERT IN HERE.

BECAUSE I KNOW JUST FOR MY LITTLE EXPOSURE. THAT. THAT YOU NEED SOMEBODY WHO KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE DOING IN THIS PARTICULAR BUSINESS TO DICTATE HOW MANY DOGS HOW MUCH SPACE HAVE PICTURED B. YES. IN THIS CASE. AND I THINK I CAN SPEAK TO SO WHY THIS STUDIES WERE DIFFERENT.

WE NEVER PROPOSED. A SPECIFIC NUMBER OF DOGS FOR THE OUTDOOR THE PURPOSE OF THE FIRST STUDY, AND IT WAS DONE QUICKLY OR THE MODELING, I SHOULD SAY WAS THE SHOW EVEN IF ONE WERE TO HAVE FIVE DOGS BARKING SIMULTANEOUSLY . THAT WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM FOR ANY RESIDENTS WITHIN OUR PROPERTY. I UNDERSTAND HOW, HOWEVER, I WOULD I ALWAYS WANTED TO DO AND WHAT WE DECIDED TO DO WHEN THE CRB KIND OF LATCHED ONTO THAT, AND IT'S LIKE, OKAY, SO FIVE CAN BE THE LIMIT. AND WE SAID NO, NO, NO, THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE SAYING. RIGHT? SO THAT'S WHY WE WENT OUT AND CONDUCTED A REAL WORLD STUDY TO PROVE THE FACT THAT IT IS NOT A FUNCTION OF HOW MANY DOGS ARE IN THE SPACE. HOWEVER, WE AS A YOU KNOW , A LUXURY WELL RUN OPERATION. WE HAVE STANDARDS. INTERNAL STANDARDS. 15 DOGS, A GROUP WHERE WE DON'T CROSS OVER, BUT IT'S NOT A FUNCTION OF HOW MANY DOGS IT'S A BUNCH OF HOW WELL THE GROUP IS RUN. SO WE READ, SO WE SPECIFICALLY SET OUT TO MAKE A STUDY. THEY COULD SHOW THAT WHAT WE WERE SAYING WAS VERIFIABLE AND WAS VALID. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YES. OKAY I'D LIKE TO GO BACK TO THE CHEMICALS USED AND BECAUSE YOU'RE YOU'RE DOING THIS TREATMENT TWICE A DAY, CORRECT FROM MY UNDERSTANDING. HOW ARE YOU MITIGATING? WITH THE PROXIMITY TO FRASURE CREEK. SO ARE YOU MITIGATING THAT WHATEVER YOU'RE SPRAYING, BECAUSE I'M NOT SURE YET WHAT IT IS, ISN'T GOING TO END UP. SOMEHOW GOING INTO THE GROUND AND IT FRASURE CREEK THERE. MY UNDERSTANDING FROM OUR CONVERSATIONS AND FROM SAI POLAND, AND I WORKED WITH LANDSCAPE ARTICLE IS THAT NONE OF IT GETS IT'S FRASIER, GREEK.

ALL OF ANYTHING DONE ON THE FACILITY IS ABSORBED INTO THE GROUND DIRECTLY BELOW THE FACILITY. BUT ALSO AGAIN. THESE AREN'T HARSH CHEMICALS. THIS IS A SAME CHEMICAL THAT IS USED TO TREAT MUNICIPAL WATER IN WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, SO IT'S PERFECTLY SAFE TO GO AND I AND I BELIEVE IT BREAKS DOWN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, SO NOTHING. WE'RE NOT REALLY AT PUTTING ANYTHING INTO FRASURE CREEK TO SPEAK OF. THAT'S THAT'S IT FOR ME RIGHT NOW. OKAY. UM, MR RICH. UM ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER COLLEGES NOT ASKING YOU A DIFFICULT QUESTION HERE. HE'S SAYING SO. YOU'RE SAYING THE ONE SMALL DOG PARK. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG IS 2300 SQUARE FOOT CORRECT SQUARE FEET . IS THAT CORRECT? YOU CAN PUT A DOG IN 40 SQUARE FEET. THAT'S YOUR THAT YOU'RE WORKING. LIMIT IS THAT CORRECT? SMALL DOGS SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST 40 SQUARE FEET. SO YOU COULD HAVE 57 DOGS IN THAT AREA AT ANY ONE TIME. I'M NOT SURE I FOLLOW. THAT WOULD BE 2300 DIVIDED BY 40.

RIGHT BUT WE'RE NOT. OUR STANDARDS AREN'T TO DO THAT. WE NEVER DO THAT. NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS. YOU'RE NOT ALL YOU'RE SAYING THAT YOU'RE NOT GIVING US THE NUMBER. ALL YOU'RE SAYING IS INDUSTRY STANDARD, BUT WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE INDUSTRY STANDARD GROUPS ARE. THE ONLY THING YOU'VE SAID IS A DOG PURPOSE. 40 SQUARE FEET IS WHAT YOU CAN TO 15 DOGS IS CONSIDERED MAXIMUM PER SUPERVISED. PER PERSON SUPERVISING DOGS. AND I ALSO MENTIONED BEFORE THAT THAT WE THAT AREA WOULD BE SUBDIVIDED INTO SMALLER SUB. THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF YOU'RE SUBDIVIDING IT. BUT I MEAN, THAT'S YOU HAVE 2300 SQUARE FEET. IF YOU WANT TO SUBDIVIDE IT INTO ITS, YOU'RE GONNA END UP WITH THE SAME NUMBER. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU SUBDIVIDED. IT DOES FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS, BECAUSE AGAIN WHEN YOU'RE KEEPING THE DOG GROUP TO TEND TO 15 DOGS, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY OF THE EXCESSIVE. YOU'RE SAYING YOU'RE NEVER GOING TO PUT MORE THAN 10 TO 15 DOGS IN 2300 SQUARE FEET. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? WE'RE GOING TO NOT PUT YES, IN EFFECT. I'M SAYING THAT BECAUSE THE 24 THE PICTURES WITH IT DON'T SHOW YOU

[04:30:03]

COUNCILMAN IS THAT WE THAT. AREA WILL BE SUBDIVIDED SO A GROUP WOULD BE IN ONE AREA COMPLETELY ISOLATED FROM ANOTHER GROUP. 10 TO 15 DOGS. THAT WOULD BE IN A DIFFERENT AREA BECAUSE YOU'RE LIMITING THE GROUPS TEND TO BE UNDER THIS. ARE THEY ALL GOING TO BE IN THAT SAME 2300 SQUARE FOOT AREA? BASICALLY. THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN DIFFERENT AREAS. THAT ARE SUBDIVIDED. INTO THAT.

AREA I MEAN, I FEEL LIKE I'M TRYING TO ANSWER HIS BEST, AND I'M BEING AS HONEST AS I CAN.

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE IN ONE AREA. NO. THAT'S THE ANSWER IS NO, THEY'RE NOT. THEY'RE NEVER GONNA GIVE YOU PUT TAPE ON THE GROUND. AND HOW DOES THE DOG KNOWS THEY CAN'T PUT SOLID BARRIERS THAT THE DOGS CAN'T SEE. BEYOND AND ABOVE THEIR HEIGHT. AND I MEAN, IF YOU'RE BASICALLY MAKING SEPARATE, OKAY , I UNDERSTAND. OKAY WHAT'S THE MAXIMUM THAT CAN BE IN THAT 2300 SQUARE FOOT AREA? IT'S NOT A NUMBER OF WE WOULD EVER APPROACH IF WE MOST PEOPLE WOULD PROBABLY DO WITH THE TWO RUN TWO GROUPS SIMULTANEOUSLY INTO SUBDIVIDED AREAS ON THAT SIDE OF THE DOCTOR. OKAY I WANT YOU. I WANT TO TALK. STOP TALKING ABOUT SUBDIVISIONS. I WANT TO TALK IN THAT AREA THAT 23 BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE A DIVIDED ON MY WHAT ? I'M LOOKING AT 2300 SQUARE FOOT SMALL PROPOSED SMALL DOG PARK. HOWEVER YOU WANT TO BREAK THOSE GROUPS UP. WHAT'S THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS BEING THERE AT ONE TIME? OUR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE IS TO RUN ONE GROUP IN AN AREA SIMULTANEOUSLY AND NOT TO RUN MORE THAN THREE GROUPS OUT OF DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY. FOR TO KEEP EVERYTHING SAFE AND FOR STAFF GOING TO SAY 30. IS THAT AN UNREASONABLE NUMBER 30 WOULD BE SUBDIVIDED INTO TWO DIFFERENT AREAS. AND AGAIN, THE POINT IS, IT'S NOT THE NUMBER OF GONNA JUMP OVER TO PROPOSED BIG DOG PARK 6700. AND 60 SQUARE FEET.

SO THAT'S. CAN WE USE MY CALCULATOR HERE? SO 67 60 DIVIDED BY 2300. SO THAT'S 2.9 TIMES. WHAT DO WE JUST SAY? 30? SO YOU'RE TELLING ME THERE COULD BE 88 DOGS OUT? IN THE PROPOSED BIG DOG PARK. ABSOLUTELY NOT, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES NEVER WOULD THAT HAPPEN. WE WOULD RUN MORE NO MORE THAN 2 TO 3 GROUPS OF 10 TO 15 DOGS OUTSIDE, SIMULTANEOUSLY INCLUSIVE OF ALL THE DOG PARK AREAS, THE POINT THAT I THINK SCOTT WAS TRYING TO SAYING THE BIG DOG PARK AND THIS COMBINED. YOU'RE NEVER HAVE MORE THAN 45 DOGS OUT. ABSOLUTELY THAT'S THE WAY WE CURRENTLY RUN OUR OPERATION IN JUPITER. WE NEVER BECAUSE THE DOGS WERE ROTATE THROUGH REST PERIODS INSIDE IN THEIR ROOMS. THEY ALSO PLAY INDOORS IN THE ROOM AT NO POINT IF WE HAD 100 DOGS IN THE FACILITY THERE'LL BE 20 TO 25 DOGS OUTSIDE IN THE TWO DOG PARTS SIMULTANEOUSLY BECAUSE WE DON'T RUN A FACILITY WHERE WE'RE THROWING 50 60 DOGS OUTSIDE. AND SAYING, YOU KNOW, HERE'S WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, SO IT'S A COUPLE OF THINGS. IT'S ONE. THE PICTURE DOESN'T SHOW THAT THERE'S WHERE WE PLAN TO SUBDIVIDE. TO MAKE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN EACH OF THE LARGE DOG PARK AND THE SMALL DOG PARK TO FIT WITHIN INDUSTRY. THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF THE INDUSTRY SECONDARY. MY CLIENTS DON'T WANT 75 DOG GROUPS OUTSIDE AT THE SAME TIME, SO YES, I CAN TELL YOU UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT AT NO POINT WILL THERE BE 80 DOGS OUTSIDE, HOWEVER. THAT WOULD NOT CREATE NECESSARILY CREATE A SOUND ISSUE IF IT WERE DONE PROPERLY, BUT THAT'S NOT OUR PREPARATION. DO WE HAVE A COPY OF THE INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR THESE TYPES OF FACILITIES? IT'S JUST THE NATIONALS DOG. I BELIEVE YOU HAVE THE FEAR FREE STANDARDS ARE MEAN YOU'VE BEEN RELUCTANT TO GIVE US A SPECIFIC ANSWER, AND YOU KEEP REFERRING TO THE INDUSTRY STANDARDS, BUT YOU HAVEN'T PROVIDED US THE INDUSTRY STANDARDS. DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW THAT IS DIFFICULT FOR US? I FEEL LIKE I FEEL LIKE MAYBE I'M NOT COMMUNICATING IT. WELL, NO, YOU'RE NOT. I'M SORRY . I TRY TO DO BETTER. SO IT IS IN YOUR PACKET INDUSTRY STANDARDS ARE IN YOUR PACKET PROVIDED BY THE ENGINEER. THAT'S IN HIS REPORT. OKAY, VERY SPECIFIC IN HIS REPORT. THERE IS ALSO, UM AND THE INDUSTRY STANDARD IS THE 15 TO 1 DOG RATIO. SO IF THERE'S 15 DOGS IN

[04:35:05]

THE YARD, THERE IS ONE PERSON AND WE HAVE STAFF ON BACKUP. IF THERE IS A DOG THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED OR HE IS NOT, UM GOING WITH OUR STANDARDS. AS WELL AS INDUSTRY SO YOU COULD HAVE SIX PEOPLE. IN THE LARGE DOG PARK. BASED ON INDIAN AND THEY EACH COULD BE DEALING WITH 10. DOGS CAN TELL YOU IN THE SEVEN YEARS THAT HAVE WORKED AT DOGS WORLD I'VE NEVER SEEN MORE THAN 20 DOGS IN THE YARD. IS THAT ANSWERED? NO THAT'S A THAT'S A SPECIFIC NUMBER. THAT'S THE SPECIFIC NUMBER BUSINESS. THAT WAY WE ROTATE THE DOGS INSIDE THE OUTSIDE, YOU HAVE ONE OR TWO, SOMETIMES THREE GROUPS OF 10 TO 15 DOGS OUTSIDE AT A TIME. THERE ARE NEVER MORE DOGS THAN THAT. I APOLOGIZE IF IT WAS AT ALL CONFUSING, I WAS TRYING TO BE AS STRAIGHTFORWARD AND HONEST AS I COULD. AND I HOPE KATIE AND SCOTT HELPED ME CLEAR THAT UP. COMMISSIONER RICH YOU HAVE ANYMORE. COMMISSIONER COLLINS WOULD LIKE TO ASK A QUESTION. I JUST HAD A STATEMENT. UM THE WISHY WASH W Y S I WASH ALRIGHT , COOL. I FOUND IT. THE WHISKEY WASHED SANITIZER IS A HANDHELD LOW PH CHLORINE GENERATOR THAT OPERATES ON A STANDARD GARDEN HOSE. THIS PATENTED CHLORINE DELIVERY SYSTEM USED WITH SOLID CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE CAPITAL. IT'S. YES WHAT WE USE? ABSOLUTELY SO. THANK YOU, OKAY. COMMISSIONER BRUNER. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REITERATE. THAT PRODUCT IS HYPOCHLORITE AND A LOT OF OUR CLIENTS DO USE IT. IT IS NOT CHLORINE. WE DO NOT RECOMMEND THAT'S ON THEIR WEBSITE THAT IT'S THAT TYPE OF CHLORIDE TABLETS. IT'S NOT. IT'S NOT LIKE BOTTLED CHLORINE BEING POURED ON THE ON THE GROUND. WHEN IT RUNS THROUGH THAT. UH, APPARATUS THAT CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE TURNS INTO CHLORINE . IT'S DELIVERING CHLORINE IN A VERY DILUTE FORMAT, THOUGH IT'S NOT LIKE POURING BLEACH ON THE GROUND. I JUST DON'T WANT YOU TO FEEL THE THAT'S WHAT THAT IS. IT'S SOMETHING YOU COULD GET ON YOUR HANDS, OKAY? OKAY MR. BRUNER. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? I, UM. INSIDE WORK. ASK BUT YOU YOU REALLY, UM YOU'VE ANSWERED THEM.

REALLY SURPRISED HOW MUCH I MEAN FOR DAYS. THIS HAS BEEN IN MY MINDING AND ALL THE THINGS I WAS THINKING AND GO INTO THE PARKS AND DIFFERENT PARKS HERE IN TOWN AND BUT I DID WANT TO SAY I KNOW WHAT YOU SAID. THINGS ARE DIFFERENT TODAY. TOTALLY DIFFERENT, TOUGHEST GROWING UP.

WAKING UP THE DOGS AND THE OWNERS AND HOW WELL THEY WANT THEM KEPT AND I DON'T HAVE A DOG. BUT A LOT OF MY FRIENDS DO HAVE DOGS. AND THE WAY THEY MAINTAIN THAT I WAS GOING TO ASK YOU. WHAT DO YOU THINK THE I MEAN, HOW SPECIAL FOOD IS THAT I WAS CURIOUS. SO WE DO HAVE OUR HOUSE FOOD, WHICH IS A CANNON, WHICH IS A VERY HIGH QUALITY PROTEIN DIET, BUT WE ALWAYS ENCOURAGE PARENTS TO BRING THEIR OWN FOOD. UM JUST, YOU KNOW, TO HELP WITH THEIR BELLIES. JUST ANSWER IT LIKE THAT. YEAH UM, WHENEVER WE CANCEL OUR DOGS ROUTINE BASED SO IF THEY HAVE THE SAME THING AND THEIR MEAL, UM THEY DO BEST ON THERE. A LOT OF TIME HAS BEEN TAKEN UP BY THE COMMISSIONERS. AND YOU ALL AND PRESENTATION. UM THIS IS THIS HAS BEEN A REALLY TOUGH ONE FOR ME, BUT I LIKE I LIKE THE PRESENTATION HOW YOU CAME BEFORE US. I REALLY FELT THAT THIS WOULD HE'S THE ONLY WAY THAT ANY OF US WOULD CONSIDER ANYTHING LIKE THIS. IT'S NOTHING LIKE IT WAS WHEN I WAS A YOUNG KID, LIKE I SAID, OR THE WAY WE EVEN HANDLE OUR DOGS OR TREAT OUR DOGS. 60 YEARS AGO. WHATEVER. UM, BUT I WANT YOU TO KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE HERE. AND THEY'RE GREAT NEIGHBORS AND THEY WANT YOU TO BE THE VERY BEST NAME FOR THE YOU CAN BE. AND YOU HAVE REALLY BROUGHT THAT PRESENTATION ON. YOUR CLIENTS. I CAN'T THINK THE CLIENT'S FIRST OF ALL WOULD WANT TO VERY BEST THING. WE WANT TO SMELL THERE. IT'S FIRST CLASS ATTACK CLASS. UM, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, COMMISSIONER, AND I THINK SOME OF OUR STEWART BASED CLIENTS ARE GOING TO SPEAK TO THAT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. THIS IS THIS IS THIS IS REALLY HARD NOW THAT THAT, UM THAT WALL WAS SIX FT OR EIGHT FT. I BELIEVE WE WERE TOLD IT COULD GO TO EIGHT FT. THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION

[04:40:06]

BECAUSE THIS. THERE WAS A ZONING AREA THAT WASN'T B THREE AND THE LIMIT WAS SIX FT. THEN THERE WAS A ZONING AREA. THAT WAS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE THREE AND THE LIMIT WAS EIGHT FT. SO WHEN AARON WAS STILL INVOLVED, SHE SAID, EIGHT FT. WE ARE WILLING TO GO TO EIGHT. FT UM, AN EIGHT FT CONCRETE. SOUND DAMPENING BARRIER IS GOING TO ALLOW FOR ZERO NOISE TO ESCAPE THE PROPERTY AT THE PROPERTY LINE WHATSOEVER. IT'S REALLY A RED HERRING CLIENTELE. IT WOULDN'T STAND FOR IT. YEAH. UM. FIND OUT TO TAKE UP SO MUCH OF YOUR TIME. FEW OTHER THINGS. LET ME SO IT IS SIX. FT IS THE LIMIT. IS IT OKAY CODE AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THE EXPERT HAD SAID THIS FILM IS THE WALL IS FOR TWO PURPOSES. IT'S FOR SOUND, BUT IT'S PRIMARILY SO THE DOGS DON'T SEE WHAT'S GOING ON ON THE OTHER SIDE AND BE EXCITED OR NERVOUS OR AGITATED, SO IT'S REALLY FROM TWO PURPOSES. BUT THE MAIN REASON IS TO PROTECT THE DOGS FROM SEEING SOMETHING THAT WOULD OKAY, GIVE THEM ANXIETIES THAT EVERYTHING SURE THAT OKAY? I KNOW IT'S BEEN A LONG NIGHT.

EVERYBODY'S BEEN WAITING FOR YOU AND BOTH SIDES HERE. IT'S AND LONG. I JUST WANT TO SAY AGAIN.

HOW STRONG THESE NEIGHBORS HAVE STOOD TOGETHER. AND THIS IS A VERY, VERY DIFFICULT DECISION. I JUST WANT THEM TO KNOW THAT THEY I REALLY BELIEVE THAT. IT'S NOT GONNA BE AS BAD AS ALL THINGS.

AND SO. THAT'S A LET'S SEE IN THE MORNING. OKAY BEFORE I CONCLUDE THE, UH, FOOD TO HEARING AND ANY OTHER LAST COMMENT YOU GUYS WOULD LIKE TO MAKE TERRY OR. OKAY THEN I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND JUST CONFIRM WITH THEM WHAT THEY TOLD ME. OKAY? SURE. SO. I'M SORRY BECAUSE THE DEAL I REPORT IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SOUND REPORT FOR SOME REASON. SO THE INDUSTRY STANDARD IT IS SIMPLY THIS. OUTSIDE AREAS RANGE FROM SCORED 40 SQUARE FEET PER SMALL DOG UP TO 100, SQUARE FEET. PRETTY LARGE DOGS. IS THAT IT IS PART OF THE INDUSTRY STANDARD. THE OTHER PART OF THAT. THAT'S WHEN YOU SAY IT'S INCLUDED. THAT'S THAT'S THE SENTENCE. RIGHT THAT'S PART OF THE INDUSTRY INDUSTRY STANDARD. THE OTHER PART OF THAT IS THAT GROUPS ARE KEPT TO 10 TO 15 DOGS OR LESS WHEN YOU PUT THOSE TWO FACTORS TOGETHER, I UNDERSTAND THAT IN A SUB DIVISIONS AND ITS SUBDIVISION OF THE LARGER AREA. SO YOU'RE ASKING US TO APPROVE.

YOU'RE JUST TELLING US YOU WON'T DO THIS, BUT WE'RE APPROVING IT. IN 20TH. WHAT IS THE 2600 SQUARE FEET DIVIDED BY 40. I THINK THAT WAS 65. IN THE SMALL AREA. BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU THAT'S ALL YOU'RE SAYING TO US REALLY IS. WE WILL ADHERE TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS IN THE INDUSTRY STANDARD. IS OUTSIDE AREA RANGE FROM SCORE 40 SQUARE FEET PER SMALL DOG UP TO 100 SQUARE FEET PER HOUR OR SO. THE INDUSTRY STANDARD ALSO PRESCRIBES YOU KEEP A GROUP TO 10 TO $15. THOSE TWO THINGS WORKING TOGETHER. OR WHAT CREATES SAFETY AND QUIET GROUPS. I UNDERSTAND THAT, OKAY ? AND WE AT ARE YOU SAYING TO ME? TO THIS COMMISSION THAT THERE WILL NEVER BE MORE THAN 15 DOGS. OUT IN THE LARGE AREA, THE 6300 SQUARE FEET STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. WE NEVER RUN MORE THAN 20 IN OUR LARGE DOG PARK IN JUPITER. HOW BIG IS THAT? IT'S A SIMILAR AT 60. IT'S AROUND 6500 SQUARE FEET. BECAUSE IT WOULDN'T MAKE SENSE. IT'S HARD TO STAFF THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO ALSO BUILD WAY MORE INTO THE PARK TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE KEEPING THE GROUPS SEPARATED THAT WAY. SO THE THING THAT I THINK IS GETTING LOST. IS YOUR COMBINING TWO THINGS TO KEEP THE GROUP QUITE RIGHT BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOISE. THAT'S THE ISSUE. WHEN YOU ADHERE TO BOTH SIDES OF THAT STANDARD. YOU DON'T HAVE NOISE. WE ADHERE TO BOTH SIDES OF THAT STANDARD IN EVERYTHING WE DID. AND WE DON'T NORMALLY RUN AS CABLE. THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STANDARD. 600 SQUARE

[04:45:03]

FEET FOR EACH SMALL DOG PLAY YARD. NO. OKAY SO IT'S NOT A FUNCTION OF NUMBER OF DOGS. ONE PERSON FOR EVERY 10 TO 15 DOGS IS THAT THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PART OF THE RECOMMENDED STANDARD , SO WHEN YOU PUT IT AT IT ALL TOGETHER, YOU HAD 10 TO 15 DOGS. YOU GIVE THEM THE PROPER APPROPRIATE SQUARE FAKES FOOTAGE. YOU DON'T GIVE THEM TOO MUCH FOR HIM. YOU DON'T GIVE THEM TOO LITTLE ROOM AND YOU HAVE A QUALIFIED STAFF MEMBER. YOU DON'T HAVE NOISE, AND THAT IS HOW WE RUN OUR BUSINESS AND LIMITING. LIMITING THE NUMBER OF DOGS BY STAFF PERSON DOES NOTHING BECAUSE YOU CAN HIRE MORE STAFF PEOPLE. AND THEREFORE HAVE MORE DOGS. NOT IN THE SAME GROUP, SIR. I REALIZED THAT IN THE SAME GROUP SO THAT THEN AGAIN, IT WOULD BE COMPLETELY MITIGATING ANY ISSUES THAT ANYONE WOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT NOISE. BECAUSE THE EQUATION IS YOU KEEP THE GROUP SMALL. YOU HAVE THE PROPER SQUARE FOOTAGE AND YOU HAVE A PROPER RELEASE ITS TRAIN STAFF MEMBER WHEN YOU KNOW YOU'RE ASKING US TO APPROVE THIS FOR YOU WITH THIS. WITH ONLY THIS LIMITATION ON THE NUMBER OF DOGS THAT CAN BE IN THE AREA AT ONE TIME. THE INDUSTRY STANDARD. CORRECT, THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY OKAY. THAT POINT I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE EVIDENCE PORTION OF THE HEARING, AND WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT, AND I'M GONNA START WITH. GARY SAUCING. DID I PRONOUNCE IT CORRECT? OH GOOD. THANK YOU. IF YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD WHEN YOU GET TO PLEASE SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE FOR US SO WE CAN GET IT ON THE RECORD. IT'S BEEN RESTING. YEAH MY NAME IS GARY SLAWSON. I OWNED THE PROPERTY OF 6 25 CHANNEL AVENUE. IT'S RIGHT. VERY CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY. MY ISSUE IS WHEN I BUILT THE PROPERTY AND 2003. I HAD TO GET THREE DIFFERENT ENGINEERS BEFORE FINALLY GOT APPROVED. AND ALL THE STREET WATER. RUN DOWN MY DRIVEWAY, SO I SPENT MASSIVE AMOUNT OF MONEY. TO TAKE CARE OF THIS. THIS IS 6 25 MATTERS FINALLY ENGINEERED IT SO ALL THAT STREET WATER RUNS DOWN MY DRIVEWAY INTO THIS INTO MY DRAIN FIELD. SO AM I GONNA HANDLE THEIR WATER TO THAT WAY STUFF BECAUSE AT THAT TIME THEY WOULDN'T LET IT RUN INTO FRASER . GREEK THEY SAID, WELL, YOU GOT TO HANDLE IT OFF. SO WE ENGINEERED THE WHOLE BLOCK THE RUN DOWN MY DRIVEWAY AND THERE YOU GO. YOU NEED TO DO A LITTLE INVESTIGATION. YES AND NEIGHBORS . ALL MY NEIGHBORS SAID THEY DON'T WANT TO DO KENNEL HERE. THIS IS A QUIET, HAPPY FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD. WE HAVE MEETINGS IN THE PARK AND STUFF. WE ALL GET ALONG. IN THE BEGINNING. I HAD A TOUGH TIME BECAUSE I HAD TO GET THREE ENGINEERS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. YOU KNOW, MATHERS, THEY DID IT. THEY FINALLY SOLVED MY PROBLEM. MAYBE THEY CAN SOLVE THEIRS BECAUSE I DON'T WANT THEIR MONEY. AND I DON'T WANT THEIR WATER ON MY PROPERTY. HELLO MY NAME'S GEAR SOURCE. AND THANKS FOR LISTENING. THANK YOU, ALAN WALDEN. I AM A RESIDENT OF STEWART AND I'VE BEEN GOING TO DOGS WORLD FOR SIX YEARS NOW WITH MY DOG. HE IS. ALWAYS HAPPY AND EXCITED TO HEAR THAT HE'S GOING AND HE LOVES THE STAFF AND RUNNING WITH THE DOGS. THEY HAD DOGS WORLD THRIVED ON THE SOCIAL INTERACTION WITH THE OTHER DOGS . AS YOU KNOW, DOGS REALLY NEED TO BE SOCIALLY. SOCIALIZED AT ALL TIMES TO KEEP THEM HAPPY. TO KEEP THEM. FROM BEING AGGRESSIVE. AH! I BELIEVE, AND I KNOW A LOT OF OTHER DOG OWNERS BELIEVE THAT I MEAN ON THE BEACH THAT SOCIAL INTERACTION IS VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. I VALUE THE SERVICE FROM DOGS WORLD AND I KNOW HE IS IN GOOD HANDS. WHEN HE GOES THERE. THEY LOVE EACH DOG AS IF IT WERE THEIR OWN.

THERE ARE ALWAYS AVAILABLE WHEN I NEED TO DROP HIM OFF. UNEXPECTED OR NOT. I'M VERY EXCITED TO SEE THAT THIS OPPORTUNITY FOR A NEW FACILITY AND STEWART IT IS CONVENIENT.

[04:50:02]

HOST A HOME AND SINCE I LIVE HERE IN STUART ON THE DAYS ARE LONG WORK HOURS. I KNOW HE'S ONLY A SHORT DRIVE AWAY. RATHER THAN GOING ALL THE WAY DOWN TO JUPITER TO PICK HIM UP. THE NEW FACILITY. SINCE IT IS A FOR PROFIT BUSINESS WILL ADD TO THE TAX BASE OF THE CITY. AS WELL AS BRINGING ADDED REVENUE TO THE STORES AND SHOPS IN TOWN. BRING PEOPLE. INTO STEWART, WHO NORMALLY DON'T COME. THIS HAS BEEN AND WILL ALWAYS BE FOR APOLLO TO MAKE NEW FRIENDS.

THANK YOU. KOURTNEY KASLOW. HELLO, COURTNEY KASLOW. I'VE ALSO TAKEN MY DOG THERE SINCE THEY FIRST OPENED, AND I REALLY HONESTLY WOULD NOT TAKE MY DOG ANYWHERE ELSE. THE ONLY OTHER PEOPLE I LET TAKE CARE OF MY DOG WOULD BE MY FAMILY. UM EVEN GOING TO THE BEACH, UM ON MY DOG AND WATCHING ALL THE OTHER DOGS BECAUSE IT CAN REALLY HAPPEN ANYWHERE THAT YOUR DOG GETS ATTACKED. EVEN IF YOUR DOG'S FRIENDLY OTHER PEOPLE CAN BE GOING AFTER THEM. I LOVE DOGS WORLD BECAUSE THEY DO TRAIN. THEY'RE STAFFED, UM TO THE BEST, AND THEY HAVE THEIR TEMPERAMENT TASK TO CHECK THAT EVERY SINGLE DOG THAT COMES IN THERE IS FRIENDLY AND IT'S NOT JUST A RANDOM DOG COMING IN THERE THAT COULD GO AFTER YOUR DOG BECAUSE I HAVE A BIG BULL MASSIVE AND A LOT OF OTHER DOGS WOULD GO AFTER BIG DOG LIKE THAT. SO I LOVE THAT DOG'S WORLD IS HANDS DOWN THE BEST DOGS FACILITY I'VE EVER BEEN TO KNOW NOISES. HUGE THING. I'VE GONE THROUGH TOURS WITH THEM, AND IT'S BEEN COMPLETELY QUIET, HONESTLY, AND THEY'VE BEEN PLAYING, UM SOOTHING MUSIC FOR THE DOGS, WHICH I WOULD ASSUME THAT DEFINITELY HELPS KEEP THEM QUIET, AND I PULLED UP TO THE GATED CHAIN LINK FENCE AND YOU DON'T REALLY HEAR DOGS. YOU CAN SEE KIND OF THAT THEY'RE THERE, BUT YOU DON'T HEAR HIM. SO IF YOU GUYS EVER GO TO THERE, YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S NOT VERY LOUD. AND, UM I LOVE DOGS, WORLD AND AS A YOU KNOW, ON EARTH, UM , HOMEOWNER, STEWART. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THEM UP HERE. I THINK IT WOULD REALLY BENEFIT THE TOWN OF STEWART TO HAVE A HIGH QUALITY PLACE TO BRING THEIR DOG RATHER THAN THESE OTHER PLACES. I DON'T PAY A LOT OF MONEY TO BRING MY DOG JUST TO ANY PLACE I DO IT BECAUSE IT'S A GOOD QUALITY PLACE FOR YOUR DOGS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CHRISTINA AND I'M HAVING TROUBLE READING THE WRITING TOMORROW, RENO LISTEN UP. IT'S CHRISTINA. MARCELINO. MARCELINO, OKAY? UM SO I DIDN'T ACTUALLY PREPARE ANYTHING BECAUSE THIS IS VERY CLOSE TO HALTON FOR A LOT OF US AND THAT'S WHY WE DO THIS. UM I'VE BEEN A RESIDENT OF STEWART FOR ABOUT SIX YEARS. I MOVED HERE WITH MY HUSBAND TO START A FAMILY. AND UM, WE ENDED UP WITH ONE FOR A BABY OUT OF THAT. SO AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, THAT'S MY SOLE PURPOSE IS MY DOG. UM. AS YOU GUYS HAVE KIND OF HEARD. OUR GENERATION WERE VERY INVOLVED WITH THEIR PETS. THE SAME WAY THAT I'M SURE THAT YOU'VE RESEARCHED DAYCARE IS FOR YOUR CHILDREN. WE DO THAT WITH OUR PETS, AND THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE THAT I'M COMFORTABLE LEAVING MY DOG. OVERNIGHT FOR A FEW HOURS. UM I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU GUYS ARE COMING FROM, AND I REALLY HOPE THAT YOU GET AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE JUPITER LOCATION SO THAT YOU CAN REALLY SEE WHAT IT IS. IT'S BEAUTIFUL. THERE'S NO SMELLS. I MEAN, AS A CUSTOMER, YOU WALK IN, AND IT'S PRISTINE.

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL SPOT. I WOULD BRING MY ACTUAL CHILDREN THERE TO BE TOTALLY TRANSPARENT, BUT IT'S SUCH AN AWESOME PLACE TO COME HOME. I HAVE A FOUR YEAR OLD HUSKY, AND I'M SURE YOU GUYS HAVE SOME KIND OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON HOW LOUD THEY ARE, AND THEY'RE THEY'RE VERY ACTIVE. AND THE SECOND HE GETS IN THE CAR. HE'S OUT LIKE A LIGHT AND HE SLEEPS THE ENTIRE WAY HOME, WHICH IS A 30 MINUTE DRIVE FOR US. UM AND THEN HE SONG GOES UP ON THE COUCH AND THEN THE DUDE SAID HE'S NOT THERE. HE IS RUNNING RAMPANT THROUGH THE HOUSE, AND HE'S AN ONLY CHILD. SO HE NEEDS THAT PLAYTIME. SO UM, OBVIOUSLY FOR US LIVING IN STUART, THIS IS AWESOME FOR US. AND I REALLY HOPE THAT THAT YOU GUYS SEE THE VALUE IN THIS AND I HOPE THAT YOU GUYS ARE ABLE TO FIND IT AS WELL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, CASEY. CARRIE QUINN.

HI I'M SHERRY QUINN. THANK YOU. FOR YOUR TIME. I WAS PRESIDENT OF JUPITER FOR 23 YEARS. UM I'VE

[04:55:08]

BEEN IN STUART FOR I THINK ALMOST FOUR YEARS NOW. ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT HERE. I'VE MOVED MY KIDS FROM THEIR SCHOOL BENJAMIN SCHOOL IN NORTH PALM BEACH, WHICH WE ARE DEEPLY EMBEDDED IN AS A FAMILY. I'VE MOVED THEM UP HERE FOR GEOGRAPHIC PURPOSES, BUT I HAVEN'T MOVED MY DOGS YET. I STILL DRIVE AN HOUR AND 10 MINUTES. UM BECAUSE IT'S WORTH IT. AND THERE SIMPLY ISN'T ANYTHING UP HERE THAT COULD EVEN REMOTELY COMPARED TO DOGS WORLD AND I, UM. I'M ALSO A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS OWNER AND AN ENTREPRENEUR. I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE WINNING. FORMULA FOR, UM. DOG LODGING RATIOS, INDUSTRY STANDARDS, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THIS. WHATEVER THE WINNING FORMULA IS, THEY GOT IT. AND IF SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU'RE HEARING SOUNDS A LITTLE BIT TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. I WOULD LIKE TO ATTEST AS IT'S STUART RESIDENT.

AND AS A VERY HAPPY CUSTOMER OF DOGS WORLD THAT THEY ARE TRUE. I PULLED MY VEHICLE UP TO THAT TWO DOGS WORLD. AND NO, I'M NOT A RESIDENT THAT LIVES NEXT DOOR, SO I WOULD UNDERSTAND THOSE CONCERNS WHOLEHEARTEDLY. BUT I PULLED YES, VERY VALID. I PULLED MY VEHICLE UP AND I CAN TELL YOU UM. I'VE NEVER HEARD DOGS BARKING. ARE YOU GOING TO SAY? THAT'S RIDICULOUS. IT IS YOU DON'T HEAR THE DOGS BARKING. UM THEY'RE NOT BARKING. THEY'RE HAPPY. IT'S A LOT LIKE BRINGING YOUR CHILD TO KINDERGARTEN. ON THE SECOND DAY, YOU HAVE TO PUSH HIM OUT OF THE BACKSEAT.

PROBABLY DIDN'T GO SO WELL. THE FIRST DAY WE'RE FROM MOM AND DAD AT SCHOOL WHEN I PULL UP TO DOGS WORLD FIRST OF ALL, I HAVE TO PACK THE DOG FOOD IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. BECAUSE WHEN I TAKE OUT THE LITTLE ZIP LOCKS AND START WRITING THE DATES ON AND PUT THE FOOD IN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE IN MY HOME WITH MY TWO GOLDEN DOODLES BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY'RE GOING TO THE DOGGY HOTEL PLAYING WITH THEIR DOG. AND TALK ABOUT NOISE PROBLEM IN THE CONDO. THAT'S WHAT I WOULD HAVE, BUT, UM, I PACK EARLY AND MY DOGS ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT AND I WILL WRAP IT UP BY SAYING THAT THIS IS JUST AN UNBELIEVABLE BUSINESS SO WELL NOT THANK YOU SO MUCH. UH, THOMAS KORNMAN.

THOMAS HARDIMAN 62 OH CHANNEL AVENUE THERE IN STUART. I'M A DIRECT NEIGHBOR OF THE PROPERTY.

IF ANYBODY THAT'S GOING TO BE IMPACTED, IT'LL BE ME. FOR THE RECORD. I DON'T KNOW THE APPLICANT. I'VE NEVER MET THE APPLICANT AND I DON'T WORK FOR THE APPLICANT. I'M HERE TO REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THIS. I REPEAT THAT. I'M HERE TO REQUEST THAT YOU APPROVE THE APPLICATION. I'M A N B. IN MY BACKYARD. MY EXPERIENCE HERE IN MARTIN COUNTY, HAS BEEN INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE BROKER. I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH CANDLES AND DOGGIE DAYCARE. I'VE WORKED ESTABLISHING THEM. THE LAST ONE WAS CHANGE. FROM AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING. TO DOGGY CAKE HAIR.

AND FROM WHAT I HEAR, HEAR. I'M REALLY IMPRESSED WITH THE QUALITY. I'VE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS. BUT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE IS CHANGE. THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION WAS A PINEAPPLE PLANTATION. PINEAPPLES WEREN'T PROFITABLE. CHANGE. SORT OF STEADIEST STEWART BUT IN THE STUDY WHEN I MOVED INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 30 YEARS AGO. WHERE THIS BUILDING IS WAS A RUNDOWN TRAILER PARK. ACCOMPANIED WITH HOT DOG STANDS CHINESE RESTAURANT. BATTERY WAREHOUSE HODGEPODGE. CHANGE OCCURRED COMMISSIONERS BEFORE HOUSTON. HEY LET'S PUT IN ROYAL PALM FINANCIAL CENTER. HMM. CLASS A. NOW THE BUILDING USED TO BE OFFICERS. LOTS OF OFFICERS WITH LOTS OF PEOPLE. CHANGE OCCURRED. COLVIN CHANGE. ZOOM. CHANGE. WORK AT HOME. CHANGE.

EVERYTHING LEADS TO CHANGE. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. IN CONCLUSION. APPROVE THE

[05:00:04]

APPLICATION. HEY EMBRACE CHANGE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. KURT. IN GRAD, CONFUSING STREET. I HAD TO CHANGE THINGS AROUND A LITTLE BIT, AND I'M GOING TO ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAD. THE MATH TURNS OUT TO BE 60 57 SMALL DOGS IN THE SMALL DOG PARK. 67 LARGE DOG PARK. AND UH, LET'S SEE THE TRAFFIC. I'M NOT EVEN GOING TO GET INTO. I HOPE ALL OF YOU TOOK THE TIME TO READ MY LETTER. I'M SURE YOU DID. BUT WE'RE GETTING TWO. SOMETHING HERE, CALLED THE CONDITIONAL USE. FOR THIS URBAN CODE, CONDITIONAL USE AND GREATER AND IT SAYS THAT THE APPLICANT MUST OR WILL MEASURABLY IMPROVED THE FORM FUNCTION AND TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS OF THE URBAN CODE DISTRICT COMPLETE. HE'S DONE THAT IN ANY PARTICULAR WAY. NOT AT ALL A LOT OF THIS STUFF. WE DON'T HAVE POWERPOINT THINGS TO AS AS A SPEAKER TO DO THIS, BUT THIS JUST TAKES ME RIGHT BACK TO THE TARIFF TOMATO DAYS WHEN IT WAS WHEN IT WAS A SIX SEAT TIKI BAR AND AN OUTDOOR FURNITURE STORE. EXCUSE ME APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION, AND NOW WE'VE GOT A FULL BLOWN ROCK CONCERT PLACE THERE. YOU HAVE NO WAY OF POLICING THIS ONCE. GUESS WHO'S GOT PROOF? HE CAN HAVE HIS MANY DOLLARS AS HE WANTS BEHIND THAT SIX FT HIGH WALL AND YOU'LL NEVER KNOW IT TAKE EMBARK ALL THEY WANT BEHIND THERE, AND YOU WILL NEVER KNOW IT. JUST LIKE WE HAVE TO CALL CAPTAIN. CALL THE COPS UNTIL FROM HONORS. OVER THE SOUND OF IT. I KNOW ALL ABOUT SOUND. I SERVED ON THE CITY SOUND ADVISORY COMMITTEE. SO I KNOW ABOUT THE SOUND HOLE THING THERE AND I IN MY LETTER, I SAID, WHAT IF I WANTED TO BUILD OR SOMEBODY ELSE WANTED TO BUILD A TWO STORY APARTMENT ON SEVENTH STREET? THEY'RE THEY'RE GONNA BE LOOKING RIGHT DOWN INTO THE SIX FT WALL WITH 50 60 DOGS. I NEED SENATE. IT'S JUST NOT FAIR. IT DOESN'T BELONG IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA. I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. IT JUST IS NOT IN THE RIGHT NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S NOT ALLOWED, THEREBY ZONING NOW I'M GONNA GET TO THE OTHER PARTY, NEW CREEK DISTRICT CREEK DISTRICT. SOUTH. COMES RIGHT UP TO DOGS WORLD AND THE PROPOSED USES FOR DECREASED DISTRICT. CANDLES ARE NOT ALLOWED. KENNELS ARE ALLOWED AND DECREASED DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL AREA ONLY NOWHERE ELSE IN THE CREEK ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT. THIS IS RIGHT UP AGAINST THE CREEK DISTRICT. HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY SAY THAT? THIS IS OKAY BETWEEN INCREASED DISTRICT AND RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. AND JUST DISREGARD EVERYTHING ELSE. THIS DOES NOT BELONG. HE CAN MOVE THIS TO DOWN TO THE CREEK DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL PARK, WHERE IS ALLOWED IT'S VERY SIMPLE. IT'S A GREAT IDEA. A GREAT CONCEPT. I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST IT. OUR PLANT PRESENTATION IS GREAT, BUT WITH THE WRONG BUSINESS IN THE WRONG PLACE IN A NEIGHBOR I'VE BEEN STIRRED FOR 50 YEARS. I GREW UP IN JUPITER AND I MOVED OUT THERE BECAUSE IT WAS TURNING IN UPON BEACH AND BROWARD COUNTY CAME UP HERE IN 1972 AFTER MY TERMINAL SERVICE, AND I LOVE THIS PLACE. BEEN HERE. I'VE BEEN IN THAT HOME FOR 28. YEARS OF ALL MY NEIGHBORS HAVE BEEN THERE FOR 50 YEARS OR MORE. WE DO NOT WANT A DOG CANDLE IN THE MIDDLE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PERIOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, KURT. LAST SPEAKER CARD FOR US. TRACY BARNES. HI MY NAME IS TRACY BARNES AND I RESIDED 6 17 SOUTHWEST CHANNEL AVENUE. I'M SPEAKING FOR MYSELF , AND MY SISTER, JENNIFER CHASE , WHO RESIDES AT 6 49 SOUTHWEST CHANNEL AVENUE. I SINCERELY HOPE THAT YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO READ MY LETTER AND REVIEW THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS REFERENCING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S URBAN CODE. CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS, THE PROCESSING OF PLAN APPLICATIONS, AND THE STAFF REPORTS SLASH ANALYSIS. HERE I'D LIKE TO REVIEW A FEW POINTS CONTAINED IN MY LETTER. FIRST THE NOISE, WASTE WATER AND SOLID WASTE AND TRAFFIC THAT WILL COME INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IF THIS APPLICATION IS APPROVED. AS OF THE APPLICANTS BARRIER NOISE STUDY STATING THAT THE NOISE WILL NOT BE ABOVE THE 80 DECIBEL. DECIBELS ALLOWED BY THE CITY'S NOISE ORDINANCE. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS WELL AWARE OF WHAT 80 DECIBELS SOUNDS LIKE DUE TO THE VARIOUS BARS AND MUSIC VENUES LESS THAN A HALF MILE AWAY. 80 DECIBELS IS LOUD. AND THIS KIND OF WOULD NOT BE A HALF MILE AWAY, BUT WOULD BE ON ONE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS, AND IT'S TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE AS TO WASTE WATER AND SOLID WASTE. THERE HAS BEEN NO EXPLANATION OF WHERE THE CHEMICALS FROM THE TWICE A DAY CLEANINGS WOULD DRAIN AND SEEP. AND THE POSSIBLE SMELL FROM THE WASTE OF 100, PLUS DOGS SITTING IN AN INSANELY HOT DUMPSTER FOR UP TO A WEEK WOULD BE UNBEARABLE. AS FOR TRAFFIC AND THE PICKUPS AND DROP OFFS, BEING QUOTE ENCOURAGED TO

[05:05:04]

TAKE PLACE IN COLORADO AVENUE. THERE'S NO WAY THIS CAN BE ENFORCED. DUE TO BACKUPS IN COLORADO. THE TRAFFIC WOULD ABSOLUTELY FLOW IN THE BACK WAY FROM US ONE, DON MCPHERSON OR SIXTH STREET TO CHANNEL AVENUE INTO AND THROUGH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, MOST LIKELY AT A HIGH RATE OF SPEED. I ALSO WANT TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE PROPOSED PERMITTED USES FOR THE CREEK DISTRICT, WHICH SHOWS THAT KENNELS WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED IN THE CREEK AND DUST REAL SECTION OF THE CITY, NOT IN THE CREEK, NORTH OR SOUTH DISTRICTS. LASTLY THE FACT THAT WE HAVE SUBMITTED A PETITION FROM ALL BUT TWO OWNERS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THOSE TWO WHO ARE WHO WERE TO WRITE LETTERS. AND ACTUALLY, ONE IS HERE TONIGHT. PETITION FROM ALL THE OWNERS OF THE BUSINESSES OF THE SHOPS OF COLORADO AND A PETITION FROM RESIDENTS WHO SURROUND THE BARK PARK WHO HAVE LIVED WITH THIS SITUATION SHOULD BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR HERE. YOU KNOW, THIS IS SO NOT ABOUT DOGS WORLD BEING A BAD PLACE. IT SOUNDS ABSOLUTELY GREAT. IT'S JUST THAT NONE OF US WANT A KENNEL HOUSING MORE THAN 100 DOGS FOR 24 HOURS A DAY AND OUR NEIGHBORHOOD I MEAN, WOULD YOU REALLY WOULD YOU? SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. I APPRECIATE IT.

OKAY, ANY OTHER PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY, LET'S SEE. OKAY IT'S TIME FOR US TO DELIBERATE AND DO WE HAVE ANY DELIBERATIONS OR EMOTIONS? COMMISSIONER RICH. MICROPHONE PACK PACKETS PROVIDED BY MS BARNES. SHE INCLUDED EXHIBIT B ONE. DID YOU SEE THAT? WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT THAT.

WE DID NOT GET THE LETTERS NOW. OKAY? SO IT SAYS THERE WAS NO TRAFFIC STUDY CONCURRENCY STUDY DONE FOR THIS RIGHT? IT'S EXEMPT. IT'S EXEMPT BECAUSE, OKAY, LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION FIRST. IF I COME TO PICK UP MY DOG. ARRIVED AND THEN LEAVE. IS THAT CONSIDERED ONE TRIP OR TWO? I'M NOT A TRAFFIC ENGINEER, SO I'M NOT GONNA ANSWER THAT. I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. DID YOU SAY MISS BARNES? YOU COULD I ASK MISS BARNES A QUESTION. MR GENERALLY , THAT'S NOT OKAY IN AN INTERVENER MR DIES. DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS THAT? CONSIDERED ONE TRIP OR TWO? IF I DRIVE TO PICK UP MY DOG AND THEN LEAD IS THAT TWO TRIPS PEAK HOURS? THAT WOULD BE YOU HAVE TO COME BACK FOR IT TO BE A SECOND TRIP. OKAY, SO THEY'RE EXEMPT BECAUSE. THEY'RE GOING TO GENERATE 19 OR FEWER PEAK HOUR TRIPS. DO WE THINK THAT'S CORRECT? YES, PEAK HOURS.

HMM. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONER. UH. MICHIGAN. GREAT I'M SORRY. LONG EVENING. I APOLOGIZE.

TYPICALLY YOUR PEAK HOURS OR YOUR AM IS AROUND EUR EIGHT O'CLOCK. IS YOUR PEAK HOURS AND THEN TYPICALLY AROUND FIVE IS YOUR PM PEAK HOURS, PEAK HOURS. AND WE'RE WHAT WE ALL THINK OF PEAK HOURS. SO THEY'RE GONNA HAVE. OKAY THEY'RE NOT ACCEPT. THEY'RE SAYING INDUSTRY STANDARD . THE INDUSTRY STANDARD ALLOWS 62 KNOCKING. HE TALKED ABOUT ME. HANDS OF DOGS AND WERE EXEMPTED THEM BECAUSE WE'RE SAYING THAT THERE WILL BE FEWER THAN 19 PEAK HOUR TRIPS TO DROP THESE DOGS AND PICK THE BOX. THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE. THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE. OKAY THIS I WORKED IN THE WELLS FARGO BELT TONIGHT. OKAY, WHICH IS HERE'S THE CONCERN. FORMER CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. HERE'S THE PARKING GARAGE AND HERE'S WHERE I WORKED. FORTUNATELY THE MARKETS CLOSED AT FOUR AND I WAS ABLE TO LEAVE AROUND 4 15 IF I TRIED TO LEAVE ANY TIME AFTER 4 30. YOU CAN'T EVEN PULL OUT ON TO COLORADO. AND TO THINK PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE PART OF THE REASON IS THAT THE CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL BUILDING ITSELF IS ALREADY BUILT ITS THERE YOU COULD RENT IT OUT AS A CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL TOMORROW, BUT I'M JUST SAYING THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO BE FIRST OF ALL, IT'S THERE'S THERE NEEDS TO BE A TRAFFIC STUDY CLEARLY. UM EXEMPTION BUT NOT APPLY TO THEM.

I'M JUST SAYING THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO AT AROUND FIVE O'CLOCK, WE ALL ENDED UP WHO WORKED IN THOSE BUILDINGS. WE HAD TO GO. WE HAD TO GO DOWN TO THE LIGHTED INTERSECTION THAT TAKES YOU BEHIND THE OLD WENDY'S. UM AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO TRY TO ACCESS THAT THROUGH COLORADO. OR I MEAN, THEY'LL LEARN VERY QUICKLY. OR. US I MEAN, THEY WILL BE DRIVING THROUGH THIS

[05:10:06]

NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S REALLY. THE EASIEST IT'S GOING TO BE THE EASIEST WAY FOR THEM TO GET THERE. UM. AND THAT'S THAT'S MY FINAL. QUESTION WITH REGARD TO THIS. OKAY, ANYONE ELSE? COMMISSIONER COLLINS. SO I'D LIKE TO SAY THAT I AM SENSITIVE TO A FEW DIFFERENT SIDES OF THIS. THIS IS NOT AN EASY DECISION. I AM SENSITIVE TO BEING A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER.

I'M SENSITIVE TO THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE BEEN AT THIS SINCE MAY. TRYING TO GET THIS ACCOMPLISHED PROBABLY SPENT A LOT OF MONEY. I CAN TELL AS SOMEBODY WHO PUTS A LOT OF MY HEART AND SOUL AND TRYING TO DO THE PROVIDE THE BEST PRODUCT I CAN TO MY CLIENTS . I FEEL THAT IN YOU AND I RESPECT IT AS ANOTHER SMALL BUSINESS OWNER. ABSOLUTELY. SO. I HAVE NO ISSUES WITH WHAT YOU'RE DOING. MY ONLY CONCERN IS WHERE AND. FOR A FEW DIFFERENT REASONS. ONE IS THE PROXIMITY TO FRASURE CREEK. AND THE USE OF CHLORINE AND I DON'T KNOW THAT HOW HOW INTENSE THAT CHLORINE IS. BUT I DO NOT LIKE THAT, UM BECAUSE THERE'S NO WAY AND EVEN IF YOU COULD RETAIN IT, WOULD WE EVEN WANT TO, BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE GOING IN THE GROUNDWATER THAT'S GOING TO HAVE BEEN FRASURE CREEK TO ME. THIS TYPE OF A. BUSINESS BELONGS IN AN INDUSTRIAL AREA, WHICH IS WHY INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH WITH THE FORM BASED CODE THAT WE'RE HAVING THIS TEAM WERE PUT TOGETHER. IT EXCLUDES KENNELS AND CREEK, NORTH AND SOUTH. IT'S ONLY IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA AND I THINK THAT'S WITH REASON. I'M ALSO SENSITIVE TO MR WANTING TO SELL THIS BUILDING. I AM SENSITIVE TO BEING TAKEN FOR A WHILE. I APPRECIATE THAT YOU WOULD POTENTIALLY BE BRINGING JOBS INTO THE CITY. I THINK THAT'S AWESOME. BUT. HAVING RECENTLY RUN FOR OFFICE AND KNOCKED ON SO MANY DOORS. THE. PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND HAVE LIVED THERE FOR A LONG TIME. IT'S HARD TO GET PEOPLE TO AGREE ON JUST ABOUT ANYTHING ANYMORE. AND IT'S ALMOST UNANIMOUS. THE DESIRE TO NOT SEE THIS HAPPEN THERE. BECAUSE IT DOESN'T REPRESENT AND IT'S A MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD RIGHT? THERE IS COMMERCIAL THERE, BUT IT DOESN'T REPRESENT.

A. AND APPROPRIATE BUFFER TO THE COMMERCIAL. WE'RE NOT MOVING FROM RESIDENTIAL INTO SOMETHING THAT'S YOU KNOW, SORT OF HYBRID , AND THEN INTO THAT COMMERCIAL , WE'RE GOING FROM RESIDENTIAL TO DOG BARK DOG KENNEL. TWO. THAT COMMERCIAL SPACE AND HAVING NOT ONLY THE NEIGHBORS BUT ALSO THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES. THAT'S THAT'S REALLY HARD TO PUSH BACK ON. THE WILL OF THE RESIDENTS THERE. SO IT MIGHT HAVE. I'M SURE YOU. PRODUCE AN AMAZING PRODUCT AND SERVE PEOPLE AT A VERY HIGH LEVEL, AND I RESPECT THAT. I WOULD FOR ME. I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE APPROVING THIS BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS IN A MORE APPROPRIATE AREA, AND I HOPE TO GOD YOU FIND IT BECAUSE I THINK STEWART WOULD BENEFIT GREATLY FROM WHAT YOU DO. OKAY, MR BIRD. YOU HAVE ANYTHING T. J. SO WE DON'T HAVE A MOTION. IS THAT WHAT I'M SAYING? JUST CONFIRM. SO, UM SO LOOKS LIKE WE DON'T HAVE EMOTION OF JUSTICE AREA. I ECHO COMMISSIONER COLLINSES COMMENTS.

I THINK THAT, UH IT'S A VERY DIFFICULT ONE. I THINK THEY'VE I THINK THEY'VE DEMONSTRATED SOME REALLY GOOD FAITH, AND I ALSO THINK THE NEIGHBORS HAVE A HAVE A REALLY LEGITIMATE CONCERNS. SO OKAY, SO I GUESS WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, EVERYONE. OKAY? I'M GOING TO READ THE ORDINANCE. YEAH MIKE, IF YOU WOULD GO AHEAD AND READ THE TITLE OF ITEM NUMBER 22 IS ORDINANCE TO MR MAYOR. THERE'S A QUESTION OVER HERE. OH MOTION TO GO. WE NEED

[22. FIRE STATION 3 - REZONE FROM CPUD TO PUBLIC (QUASI-JUDICIAL)(RC): ORDINANCE No. 2506-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; TO REZONE A 1.78-ACRE PARCEL; LOCATED AT 3473 NW GREEN RIVER PARKWAY; BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED; FROM COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT "CPUD" TO PUBLIC; DEVELOPING THE SITE FOR A NEW FIRE STATION WITH 6,523 SQ FT TO SERVE THE NORTHNERN PART OF THE CITY; DECLARING THE PROJECT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS; PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

NO OKAY. UM ORDINANCE 2506-20 TO 2. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION, THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE A 1.78 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT 3473 NORTHWEST GREENER PARKWAY BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CPD TO PUBLIC DEVELOPING THE SITE FOR A NEW FIRE STATION WITH 6523 SQUARE

[05:15:05]

FEET TO SERVE THE NORTHERN PART OF THE CITY, DECLARING THE PROJECT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS PROVIDED FOR DIRECTIONS THE CITY CLERK PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, WRITING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. I WOULD SAY OKAY TO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE EXPERT TAKE COMMUNICATIONS CLOSED COMMISSIONER RICH. HE SAID HI TO A FIREMAN THE OTHER DAY. OKAY SPEAKING, GONNA MAKE IT WITH HIS UNIFORM WERE ALL LOOPY. WE'RE ALL TIRED. UH COMMISSIONER KAITLYN'S NONE. COMMISSIONER BRUNER. THE EXPERT, A COMMUNICATIONS. OKAY AND, UH, I HAVE SPOKEN WITH STAFF REGARDING IT. UM DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WILL PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY AGENDA. HAVE WE HAD ANY CHANGES SINCE THE LAST MEETING ON THE FIRE STATION? NO. AND I'M AVAILABLE TO DO A PRESENTATION. BUT YOU DID APPROVE THE FIRST READING. OKAY, SO WE ARE THE APPLICANTS. SO, MR DASH, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? JUST NO, I DON'T. I'M SCARED TO GO THERE. DO WE HAVE ANY THE DO? UH LET'S SEE THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT, MR. YOU SAID YOU WENT IN REGARD TO THE QUESTION, EXPERTS THAT YOU SAID YOU SPEAK TO STAFF STAFF ABOUT EVERYTHING. YES AND I AND I DISCLOSED THAT RIGHT WHENEVER I SPEAK TO STAFF ABOUT SOMETHING IT INVOLVES A QUASI JUDICIAL ISSUE. SO IN QUESTIONS INITIAL WHO DISCLOSE ANY OF YOUR EXPERT TAKE COMMUNICATIONS. IF YOU'VE SPOKEN TO STAFF THAT'S AN EXPERT TAKE COMMUNICATION THAT THE PETITIONER, UM OR ANY OTHER COMMUNICATION YOU HAVE CLARIFIED THAT DOESN'T TAKE PLACE AT A PUBLIC MEETING IS AN EXPERT IN COMMUNICATION WITH EITHER YOU OR MR DIAZ. OR THE EVERY ALL COMMUNICATION HAS TO BE IN A PUBLIC SETTING, SO THE OTHER SIDE CAN SEE IT SO UNLESS BOTH SIDES ARE PRESENT DURING THE CONVERSATION, IT'S X PARTY, OKAY? I'M GLAD I ASKED FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. OKAY I'M ALSO LEARNING TO ASK YOUR PERMISSION TO SPEAK FOR SPECIAL, OKAY. SO UH, THIS, UH, THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? EMOTIONAL PROOF, OKAY. WE'RE NOT QUITE THERE YET. I'M SORRY. WE GOTTA WE GOTTA FOLLOW THE WE HAVE THAT WE GOTTA FOLLOW THE SHEET, SO I KNOW WE SHOULD HAVE A DOWN TONIGHT. I MEAN, WE'VE REALLY BEEN CRANKING IT OUT SO LET'S SEE. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PORTION OF THE PRESENTATION THAT EVIDENCE FOR EVIDENCE AND HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING NONE. MR. COLLINS SIT DOWN. NO NO, NO NOTION TO APPROVE. OKAY WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KALLAS. WE HAVE A SECOND. YES COMMISSIONER BRUNER A SECOND. DO YOU HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION? MARY PLEASE CALL THE ROLL COMMISSIONER RICH. YES COMMISSIONER COLLINS? YES, COMMISSIONER. BRUNER MAYOR MCDONALD. YES OKAY, SO NOW WE HAVE SEVERAL ITEMS THAT WE NEED TO CONTINUE. CAN WE WAIT? THERE WAS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. YEAH BUT WE'RE GONNA CONTINUE, OKAY? YEAH 33. SO CAN WE DO THOSE AS ONE MOTION YOU CAN DO ALL THE ORDINANCES. AS WE HAVE TO ANNOUNCE THEM ALL THE ORDINANCE NUMBERS ON THE RECORD , BUT YOU COULD CONTINUE WHILE TO THE SAME DATE AND TIME. YES MIKE AND YOU ANNOUNCE ALL OF THE ORDINANCES AND THEN WE'LL JUST DO ONE MOTION TO CONTINUE, SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IT IS ON THERE FOR NEXT NOT DOING THAT YET. WE'RE NOT. WE'RE NOT TO THE

[23. EAST STUART NEIGHBORHOOD - SMALL-SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DATE CERTAIN DECEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COMMISSION (THIS IS A SINGLE READING ITEM) ORDINANCE No. 2500-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THEREBY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM "LOW DENSITY:' TO "EAST STUART' FOR 8.60 ACRES OF LAND; "OFFICE-RESIDENTIAL' TO "EAST STUART" FOR 1.93 ACRES OF LAND; "MULTI-FAMILY" TO "EAST STUART" FOR 4.50 ACRES OF LAND: "PUBLIC" TO "EAST STUART" FOR .53 ACRES OF LAND; AND "EAST STUART" TO "PUBLIC" FOR 5.16 ACRES OF LAND AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED; DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 24. THE CREEK DISTRICT - SMALL-SCALE FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DATE CERTAIN DECEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COMMISSION (THIS IS A SINGLE READING ITEM) ORDINANCE No. 2502-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THEREBY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND DESIGNATION FROM "COMMERCIAL" TO "DOWNTOWN" FOR 20.07 ACRES OF LAND AND "DOWNTOWN" TO "RECREATION" FOR .25 ACRES OF LAND AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED; DECLARING THE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 25. EAST STUART NEIGHBORHOOD - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DATE CERTAIN DECEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE No. 2499-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO ASSIGN "EAST STUART NEIGHBORHOOD" ZONING AND MAKE CHANGES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 26. THE CREEK DISTRICT - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DATE CERTAIN DECEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE No. 2501-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO ASSIGN "THE CREEK DISTRICT" ZONING AND MAKE CHANGES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 27. EAST STUART NEIGHBORHOOD - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DATE CERTAIN DECEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE No. 2507-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING AND RESTATING THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING CHAPTER III SPECIAL ZONING CODES FOR THE "EAST STUART NEIGHBORHOOD"; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 28. THE CREEK DISTRICT - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CONTINUED TO DATE CERTAIN DECEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE No. 2498-2022; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AMENDING AND RESTATING THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING CHAPTER II ZONING DISTRICTS USES ALLOWED, DENSITY, INTENSITY; CHAPTER III SPECIAL ZONING CODES FOR "THE CREEK DISTRICT"; AND CHAPTER XII DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

END OF THE AGENDA YET, BUT AS IT PERTAINS TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 23 WHICH IS ORDINANCE 2500-2022 ITEM NUMBER, 24, WHICH IS 25. OH 2-2022 ITEM NUMBER 25, WHICH IS ORDINANCE 24 99 2022 ITEM NUMBER 26 WHICH IS ORDINANCE 25 OH, 1-2022. I AM NUMBER 27, WHICH IS ORDINANCE 25 7-2022 ITEM NUMBER 28, WHICH IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 98 2022 STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION CONTINUE THIS MATTER TO A DATE CERTAIN OF DECEMBER. THESE MATTERS TO A DATE CERTAIN OF DECEMBER 12TH.

2022 CAN WE HAVE A MOTION FOR TO CONTINUE THE ITEMS READ BY MR MARTEL TO DECEMBER 12 2022 MOTION TICKET. SO MOVED. I MOVED BY COMMISSIONER RICH AND DO WE HAVE A 2ND 2ND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COLLINS. OKAY SO DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE MOTION, SAYING NONE. MARY CALLED THE ROLL, PLEASE. COMMISSIONER BRUNER. YES MR MCDONALD. COLLINS COMMISSIONER

[8. EASEMENT WITH FECR, L.L.C. FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (RC): RESOLUTION No. 99-2022; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STUART AND THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, L.L.C. ("FECR") FOR TWO (2) TEN (10) FOOT WIDE EASEMENTS RELATED TO THE PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS DEPICTED IN SCHEDULE A, RESCINDING ALL RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

RICH YES. WE'RE GOING TO GO NOW. WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK TO ITEM EIGHT. LET'S SEE WHICH LET ME GET THAT FEARFUL THAT UP HERE IS , UH AND COMMISSIONER COWAN'S HAS REQUESTED THAT WE LOOK AT THIS ITEM AGAIN. SO, MIKE, WOULD YOU READ US THE AGENDA IN READ US THE ORDINANCE OR THE TITLE

[05:20:08]

AND THEN WE'LL ADDRESS IT. ADDRESS IT TO MEET POLLED. I'M SORRY, IT WAS NOT NOT, BUT IT WAS DURING THE BREAK COLUMNS. THEY DID VOTE ON IT, BUT DURING IT WAS VOTED ON AS PART OF CONSENT. BUT DURING THE BREAK, COMMISSIONER, COLLINS RETURNED FROM THE BREAK AND ASKED THAT WE REVISIT THE ITEM BEFORE THE ENDING OF THE MEETING. AND THAT IS RESOLUTION NUMBER 99 DAYS TO GO TO A RESOLUTION, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STEWART AND THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC, KNOWN AS FC ER. FOR 2 10 FT WIDE EASEMENTS RELATED TO THE PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DEPICTED AND SCHEDULE A WE'RE SENDING OVER RESOLUTIONS AND CONFLICT, PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATA FOR OTHER PURPOSES. DO YOU WANNA BANG IT OUT NOW OR BUMP AT THE NEXT MEETING? UM WELL, YEAH, GO AHEAD. YOU'RE GOING TO DO A RECONSIDERATION OF THE NEXT. MR DAVIS, CAN YOU PLEASE TELL US ABOUT THE ITEMS? HOLD ON. I'M TRYING TO PULL UP. BECAUSE I THOUGHT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT WAS FROM BRIGHT LINE AND NOT FCC. INCORRECT ON THAT, MIKE. I THOUGHT THERE'S A PCR. IT'S THE FCC'S PROPERTY, BUT IT'S FOR BRIGHT LINES, WHATEVER. BUT TECHNICALLY THEY'RE THE LANDOWNER, AND HE SEES A TENANT SO I DON'T KNOW. OKAY, UM, SO PROPERTY. WELL THE EASEMENT IS ON OUR PROPERTY. BEING GIVEN TO WHO WHO'S GETTING IT IS THE QUESTION. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IS BRIGHT LINE, SO IT'S AN EASEMENT ACROSS THE FLAGLER PARKING LOT GOING TOWARDS THE WEST. THIS IS FOR RUNNING POWER LINES TO ENHANCE THE, UM DRAWBRIDGE PORTION OF THE BRIDGE . ANOTHER ITEM WILL BE COMING TO YOU GUYS AGAIN FROM BRIGHT LINE FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BRIDGE TO UTILIZE OUR PROPERTY FOR STAGING AND MOBILIZATION OF EQUIPMENT TO WORK ON THAT DRAWBRIDGE FOR OFF OF THE NORTH SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY. UM THEY HAVE NOT SENT ME BACK THAT ITEM YET, SO THEY'RE NOT PREPARED FOR IT, BUT WE HAVE REVIEWED IT AND SEND IT BACK WITH OUR COMMENTS. BOTH OF THESE. I BELIEVE I THOUGHT IT SAYS 40 EAST COAST, BUT WHEN I SAW THEM THIS SEASON IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE FOR POWER.

AND THEN THE NORTH SIDE. WE OWN. THAT PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SIDE OF THE BRIDGE IS FOR BASICALLY FOR THEM TO UTILIZE IT OR MOBILIZATION OF THEIR EQUIPMENT. UM AND THAT'S THAT'S WHAT THE EASEMENT IS FOR. IT'S A IT'S A SMALL HE'S MEANT JUST TO RUN THE POWER THREE PHASE POWER, WHICH IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BRIDGE, SO IT'S MY UNDERSTAND FROM READING THE ITEMS. THE SORRY SPEAKING TO THE MICROPHONE FROM READING THE ITEM, FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, PUT A NEW TRANSFORMER AND THEY NEED TO GET TO THAT TRANSFORMER FURTHER POWER FOR THREE DAYS.

THE REALITY OF IT IS THAT FOR A POWER AND LIGHT HAS A UH, FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY TO PUT THEIR LINES IN OUR RIGHT OF WAYS. HOWEVER THIS LITTLE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT THE BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH BONG TRAFFIC LANES OF DOWN BY FLAGLER PARK IS NOT RIGHT OF WAY . IT IS ACTUALLY FEE SIMPLE, OWNED BY THE CITY OF STEWART, SO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT DOES NOT GIVE THEM THE ABILITY TO RUN THE LINES WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. SO HE WAS MY THOUGHT IS WE ALMOST HAVE NEVER HAVE LEVERAGE WITH BRIGHT LINE EVER RIGHT, SO OR IF YOU SEE SO I'M A LITTLE A LITTLE BIT CONFUSED ABOUT WHO'S GETTING IT RIGHT. BUT WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ALONG THERE THAT WE LEASE FROM FCC AND THE INTERSECTIONS, I ASKED JOLIE AND HE SAID THE PARKING SPACES ALONE ARE LIKE 54 GRAND A YEAR, THE INTERSECTION THAT CONFUSION CORNERS LIKE 30, AND I'M NOT EVEN SURE WHAT SOME OF THOSE OTHER INTERSECTIONS ARE. WHETHER IT'S THIS PARTICULAR ITEM THAT THERE THEY NEED TO DO WHAT THEY NEED TO DO OR, YOU KNOW, FUTURE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BRIDGE IS AND I TALKED TO MR MARTEL AND HE HAD A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THIS WITH THE HARBOR RIDGE I WANNA BECOMES UNTENABLE TO DEAL WITH THE LEAST BECAUSE THEIR RELEASES A PRE, UM ESCALATE AT 5% A YEAR SORT OF THEIR STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. AND IT BECOMES UNTENABLE FOR LIKE HEART BRIDGE. AT SOME POINT, HARVARD WAS SAID WE CAN'T PAY THIS ANYMORE BECAUSE JUST 364 $100,000 A YEAR FEES, PARKING SPACES, YOU KNOW, AND SO WHEN IT BECOMES UNTENABLE, UM FCC WILL COME IN AND RENEGOTIATE AND BASICALLY HIT THE RESET BUTTON AND START OVER AND THEN SLOWLY START ESCALATING TO THE ON THAT 5% SO MY THOUGHT WAS, YOU KNOW, WE ALMOST NEVER HAVE LEVERAGE. WE HAVE SOMETHING THAT THEY WANT NOW, WHETHER THEY WANTED THAT THAT I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY COULD JUST COMMANDEER IT. I DON'T KNOW. BUT THE THOUGHT BEING WHY NOT RENEGOTIATE OR ATTEMPT TO GIVE IT A SHOT TO HIT THE RESET BUTTON ON THAT AND SORT OF START OVER WITH THAT 5% ESCALATOR? UH SINCE WHO KNOWS WHEN THE LAST TIME WE DID. THAT WAS A NINETIES OR SOMETHING. I WOULD LOVE TO DO THAT. EXCEPT FOR OKAY. DO YOU HAVE TO GET THD

[05:25:10]

CONSEQUENCES AND TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION OUR PARKING LEASES IF I'M CORRECT, MIKE HAVE A 30 DAY ACROSS THE INTERSECTIONS. SO ALL OF THE INTERSECTIONS AND ALL THE PARKING THEY THEY CAN END THE LEASES WHERE WE CROSS THAT CONFUSION CORNER. WE RELEASED THAT INTERSECTION FROM THEM, AND I DO KNOW THERE WAS A TIME IN STEWART'S HISTORY WHERE THEY WERE WHEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT COULD GIVE TRAIN SPEEDING TICKETS AND THE CITY OF STUART GAVE SPEEDING TICKETS AND THEY SHOWED UP WITH THIS AND START GETTING READY TO CLOSE OFF THE INTERSECTION OF CONFUSION, QUARTER WITH POWER.

THEY'RE STARTING. THEY'RE READY TO START DRILLING THE BALLADS. I MEAN, DO YOU THINK IT'S WORTH A SHOT THAT THEY WOULD JUST COME IN AND CLOSE ALL OUR INTERSECTIONS FOR EVEN ASKING, THEY MIGHT TAKE OUR PARKING AWAY FROM US RESPOND REAL QUICK. SO JOLIE DID SEND SOME NUMBERS, AND I THINK HE MIGHT HAVE SENT IT TO YOU, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ALL OF THE NUMBERS. FOR EXAMPLE, MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD THAT LEASE SPACE IS 5700 A YEAR. UM THAT'S INCREASED FROM 2019 AT 4700 TO CURRENTLY AT 7 5040. AND THEN OUR PARKING SPACES ARE CURRENTLY AT 1 40,088 BACK IN 2019. THEY WERE 33,000. SO THERE IS THIS INCREMENTAL INCREASES AND IT DOES GO UP AS YOU POINTED OUT. I HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE BRIGHT LINE ENTITY. I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE INTERACTION BETWEEN BRIGHT LINE AT THE C ON TWO DIFFERENT PROJECTS. ONE IS A NEW BRIDGE.

WHERE THEIR ENTIRE PROCESS OF ENGINEERING WAS COMPLETELY BROUGHT TO A STOP AND FCC TOOK IT OVER AND WOULD NOT ALLOW THEM TO EVEN TALK ABOUT THE SUBJECT UNTIL PCS ENGINEERS REVIEWED THE PROJECT. FTC IS EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT OH, THEY'RE THE SISTER COMPANY WITH ITS EFFICACY IS HERE AND BRIGHT LINE IS HERE. AND SO, UH, FLORIDA STREET. FCC CAME IN AND DIDN'T LIKE WHAT THEY DID AND SAID OKAY, GET YOUR PARK TO US. GET YOUR PARK OFF OUR PROPERTY, AND WE'RE GONNA CUT THE END OF YOUR OF MARTIN LUTHER KING PARK OFF AND I MEAN, THEY THEY HAVE THEY HOLD THE CARDS AND I DON'T THINK THIS EASEMENT IS ENOUGH. BY ASKING A CARD FOREST. THINK YOU? I THINK I THINK IT COULD BE THE UNINTENDED BECAUSE I AGREE WITH YOUR THINKING. I THINK THAT IF WE GET TO SORRY, INTERRUPTED, WE GET TO THE POINT OF THIS NEW BRIDGE BECAUSE IT'S OUR PROPERTY , THEN THAT THEY ACTUALLY NEED THAT. THAT WOULD BE A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO GET ON THE OTHER SIDE. WHEN WE GET TO WHEN THEY ACTUALLY GET TO THE POINT WHERE THE THERE WHERE THERE'S DECIDED TO ACTUALLY BUILD A BRIDGE, AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO NEED A PIECE OF PROPERTY NORTH OF ORIGINAL NORTHPOINT FRONT AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO RUN THE TRACKS RIGHT THROUGH THE CENTER OF OUR PROPERTY. THAT'S WHEN WE'LL HAVE THAT ONE. WELL, IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE LEVERAGE THE GOING TO BE A DIRECTIONAL DRILLING 30 FT UNDER IT ALSO SHOULD BE. IT IS WORTH WHEN WE'RE DISCUSSING ANYTHING WITH THEM FOR US TO BRING UP THE INDEXING AND SAYING THAT WE'RE BECAUSE I NEED I THINK THEY NEED TO THINK AND FEEL THAT WE ARE FEELING THE PROBLEM OF THAT INDEXING ALREADY BECAUSE IF WE BRING IT UP ONE TIME THE FIRST TIME, RIGHT? BRING IT UP, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT DOING THAT WE SHOULD PROBABLY BRING IT UP BUT NOT LEVERAGES, RIGHT? I THINK WE'RE TALKING TO THE WRONG AND RIGHT. WHAT WE NEED IS WILL START AS STAFF. PRESSING THAT EVERY TIME THAT WE HAVE ANY COMMUNICATION LETTER THAT WE SEND OR JUST YOU. I THINK IT JUST HAPPENS ENOUGH WHERE YOU WANNA GO? I THINK RIGHT NOW IT'S STAFF COMMUNICATION. COME HERE.

WE ARE WORKING WITH A PC ON. REMEMBER WHAT THEY SENT US RECENTLY WITH HIS BOX OUT HERE WHNTED US TO ADD THAT TO THE LEAST. SO THAT'S A DIRECT CONTACT. WE ARE WORKING WITH NBC ON THAT'S WHAT WILL BE BY THE WAY AND START THE CONVERSATION ABOUT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU KNOW THIS COMMISSIONER, COLLEGE COMMISSIONER RICH WE WHEN THEY GO IN EVERY LIGHT SEVEN YEARS FROM THE ONLY REBUILD THE TRACKS. WE PAY FOR IT, AND NOT ONLY DO WE PAY FOR IT, BUT WE DON'T GET A SAY IN IT AT ALL. AND THEY JUST SEND US A BILL AND WE PAY AND WERE EXPECTED TO PAY IT WITHIN, LIKE 10 DAYS OR SOMETHING. YES FTC PLAYS ROUGH. YEAH WE GOT A LOT OF STAFF OUT HERE. IT'S TIME TO GO. SO MARRIED ROOM SO COMMISSIONER CO

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.