[00:00:02]
LEFT HERE. CORRECT OK, ALRIGHT. WE CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. WELL, CALL. YOU WANT TO SAY THE
[CALL TO ORDER]
PLEDGE FIRST? OKAY, THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. CHAIR LORENE HERE. VICE CHAIR, BROWNFIELD. BOARD MEMBER QUASARS. OR MEMBER JOBY HERE. BOARD MEMBER MATHERS HERE. BOARD MEMBER STRONG ALRIGHT IF WE WILL STAND AND SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPORT. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH JUSTICE FOR ALL . THANK YOU VERY MUCH WITH ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE TONIGHT'S AGENDA. MOVE[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
APPROVAL SECOND IN FAVOR. WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM OUR[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
LAST MEETING ON JUNE 8TH? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. UH TASTIC. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON NON AGENDA ITEMS? I'M ASSUMING WE HAVE NOTHING ONLINE, OKAY? ANY COMMENTS BY BOARD MEMBERS ON NON AGENDA ITEMS. ALRIGHTY FIRST UP[2. LDC AMENDMENT IN RELATION TO US-1/FEDERAL HIGHWAY STREET TREE MASTER PLAN AND PROGRAM (RC):]
THE LDC AMENDMENT IN RELATION TO US FEDERAL HIGHWAY STREET TREE MASTER PLAN AND PROGRAMS. THANK YOU. I'LL INTRODUCE THE ITEMS. OLGA AND THE SADHUS CRE DIRECTOR FOR THE RECORD, I ALSO HAVE JODY , UH, NETWORK KUGLER, DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR WHO WE'VE BEEN COURTING COORDINATING WITH DURING THIS EFFORT. TO UPDATE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND SHE'S HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION AGAIN. THIS ITEM IS COMING TO YOU BECAUSE IT IS LAND DEVELOPMENT QUOTE AMENDMENTS IT SPECIFICALLY TO THE SETBACKS AND STREETSCAPES STANDARDS ALONG US ONE CORRIDOR FROM JOHN JEFFERSON TO SOUTH DIXIE CUT OFF DID YOU WANT TO TURN OFF THE LIGHTS? NINA. RIGHT? HERE'S A CORRIDOR THAT YOU CAN SEE FROM JOHN JEFFERSON TO COLORADO AVENUE.INITIALLY WE STARTED THIS PROJECT TO DEVELOP FEDERAL HIGHWAY TREAT PLANTING PROGRAM TO IMPROVE AND BEAUTIFY THE CORRIDOR BETWEEN JOHN JEFFERSON AND KEN, OR HIGHWAY OR COLORADO AVENUE. UM SIERRA WAS PARTICULARLY INTERESTED IN THIS ROADWAY SEGMENT BECAUSE IT IS A GATEWAY TO OUR HISTORIC DOWNTOWN. AND OUR TWO NEW DISTRICTS TRIANGLE DISTRICT AND THE CREEK DISTRICT. HERE ARE SOME IMAGES SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ALONG US ONE QUARTER AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S DEFICIENCIES IN THE SIDEWALK BIKE LANES ALONG THE CORRIDOR, AND THERE'S ALSO LACK OF LANDSCAPING TO PROVIDE SHADE AND CREATE A MORE COMFORTABLE EXPERIENCE FOR PEDESTRIANS. UM THERE ARE ALSO LARGE FNL POLLS THAT REDUCES THE SIDEWALK WITH IN SOME AREAS. WHICH MAKES IT HARDER TO MANURE AROUND FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS. UM HERE. YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY'RE NOT RIGHT AWAY IS APPROXIMATELY 100 FT WIDE, AND THERE'S LITTLE ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE LIMITED EXISTING RIGHT AWAY IN THE URBAN AREA. THE TRAVEL LANES ARE ALREADY AT CAPACITY. SO UM, WE HAVE COORDINATED WITH F DOT AND, UM, THERE IS NO OPTION TO REPURPOSE OR ROAD RIGHT ROAD DIET IN THIS ROADWAY SEGMENT, SO SEE, I WANTED TO START LOOKING AT DIFFERENT WAYS TO IMPROVE THE SIDEWALK CONDITIONS. UH PROVIDE SHARED USE PATHS FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS ALONG THE CORRIDOR. AND MAKE IT MORE COMFORTABLE WITH SHADE TREES. THIS SPECIFIC SEGMENT IS ALSO IDENTIFIED IN THE MPO VISION PLAN IS, UH, SERIOUS AND FATAL CRASHES IS THE NUMBER TWO SITE, UH, IN THE COUNTY FOR SERIOUS, UH, CRASHES ALSO, SO STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT IF WE DO WELL PLANTED AND MAINTAINED LANDSCAPING, IT CAN HELP REDUCE DRIVING, STRESS AND SPEEDING. AND JUST IMPROVE THE OVERALL SAFETY ALONG THE CORRIDOR. SO LAST YEAR, THE SIERRA WENT BEFORE THE BOARD AND THE BOARD APPROVED, UM, STAFF TO ENTER INTO AN INTER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL TO DEVELOP THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY STREET MASTER PLAN FROM JORDAN JEFFERSON TO CANADA HIGHWAY TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS ALONG THE CORRIDOR. AND WE DO HAVE JESSICA SEYMOUR FROM TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, WHO PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN AND THE PROGRAM AND ALSO ALL THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES. THAT'S THAT WE'RE REQUESTING TO AMEND AS PART OF THE PROJECT. AND TODAY WE'LL BE LOOKING FOR, UH, FEEDBACK ON ON THE PROGRAM AND ALSO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS AND THEN ASKING THE BOARD TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 25 03-2023 FOR THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. AND I'LL HAVE JESSIE
[00:05:07]
GIVE THE PRESENTATION NEXT. OKAY? HI THERE. JESSICA SEYMOUR FROM TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. FOR THE RECORD , UM AS PANEL ALREADY REALLY WELL INTRODUCED THE STARTED OFF WITH THE GOALS OF ADDING ADDITIONAL SHADE TREES AND ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS TO THE SEGMENT AREA ALREADY DESCRIBED. THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION THAT CAME OUT OF TWO OF THE MASTER PLANS THAT THE C R. A FUNDED FOR THE TRIANGLE DISTRICT AND FOR THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN.IT ALSO ALIGNS WITH THE GOALS OF THE SAP AND THE CITY OF STEWART HAS HAD A LONG HISTORY OF SUPPORTING, UH, TREE PLANTINGS WITHIN THE CITY. TO DEVELOP THE MASTER PLAN WE WANTED TO INCORPORATE AND COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER GROUPS, SO WE'VE BEEN REACHING OUT TO THE GARDEN CLUB OF STEWART, THE NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, THE FS MARTIN COUNTY EXTENSION, STEWART MAIN STREET AND THE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT BOARD TO GET THEIR PERSPECTIVE AS BUSINESS OWNERS TO AND HOW TO DEVELOP AN APPROPRIATE MASTER PLAN FOR THIS AREA. WE'VE ALSO BEEN WORKING CLOSELY WITH STAFF, INCLUDING THE CITY MANAGER, THE CITY ATTORNEY, COMMUNITY SERVICES, PUBLIC WORKS AND, OF COURSE, THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON DEVELOPING THOSE LD ARE SO THAT THEY ARE APPROPRIATE. AND, UM FOR THE GOALS OF THE PROJECT AND USABLE FOR THE CITY AND THE APPLICANTS. I ALREADY MENTIONED MANY OF THE REASONS WHY I WOULD WANT TO ADDRESS THE IMPORTANCE OF TREES ALONG THIS SEGMENT. ONE OF COURSE, IS THE VISUAL IMPACT OF TREES. THESE TWO IMAGES SHOW THAT THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT FOR HAVING SHADE TREES AND PLANTINGS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY IN THESE TWO IMAGES. YOU'LL SEE THAT THE CROSS SECTION IS IDENTICAL. IT HAS THE SAME CONFIGURATION OF TRAVEL LANES OF ON STREET PARKING SIDEWALKS AND GREEN SPACE UTILITY POLES. BUT WHAT'S DIFFERENT IS THE SHADE TREES. THERE'S ALSO A HUGE BENEFIT TO ONE WHEN YOU CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT, MORE KIN WITH MORE LINES, LANDSCAPING AND SHADE TREES. THAT THERE'S A ECONOMIC BENEFIT FOR THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS. TRAVELER SHOPPERS TEND TO SPEND MORE TIME IN THOSE SPACES AND SPEND MORE DOLLARS. WE IDENTIFIED AGAIN THE VISUAL IMPORTANCE OF THIS AREA AS PART OF OUR SURVEY FOR THAT FEDERAL HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN WE ASKED ABOUT THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE AREA AND MANY OF THE RESULTS THAT WE GOT BOTH IN THE OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS AND THE CHOICE QUESTIONS IS A DESIRE TO IMPROVE THE APPEARANCE OF THAT AREA. WE ALREADY MENTIONED THE EFFECTS THAT TREES CAN HAVE ON REDUCING SPEEDS BY CALMING DRIVERS. UM AND THEN ALSO ANOTHER ELEMENT OF WHY SHADE TREES CAN BE REALLY IMPROVE THIS SPECIFIC AREAS. THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN IN A PARKING LOT. BUT THEY'RE HOT AND THAT'S AND IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN UNDER A TREE, IT'S COOLER. SO THAT AFFECT HAPPENS AT SCALE. UM YOU'LL SEE THAT THIS IS A SURFACE TEMPERATURES TAKEN FROM SATELLITE, YOU KNOW, ANALYSIS AND THE HEAT BUILDING UP OVER HERE, AND IT'S BY NO SURPRISE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT'S LOCATED RIGHT THERE. UM IN DEVELOPING THE MASTER PLAN, THOUGH ONE OF THE THINGS WE REALIZED IS THAT WE CAN'T JUST ADDRESS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT ARE OUT THERE TODAY. WE ALSO NEED TO TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS WITH INFILL DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT'S WHERE THE DRS CAME IN, AND THAT'S THE PIECE THAT WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS THE PRESENTATION ON TODAY. SO THAT'S REALLY ABOUT WHEN NEW INFILL DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. WHAT WHAT ARE SETTING A APPROPRIATE EXPECTATIONS FOR WHAT THAT DEVELOPMENT CAN SHOULD BE ALONG THERE TO IMPROVE AND ALSO PROTECT THE INVESTMENT THAT THE SIERRA IS MAKING ALONG THAT CORRIDOR. THE MASTER PLAN IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE IT LOOKS LIKE THIS, UM, THE PINK AREAS IDENTIFYING WHERE THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES FOR WIDENING THE SIDEWALKS. UM, AND THEY IDENTIFY A SERIES OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES THAT ARE IMPORTANT APPROPRIATE DEPENDING ON THEIR CONTEXT. WE TRIED TO ALWAYS ASK THE QUESTION. IS IT FLORIDA FRIENDLY? AND IS IT USED SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE CORRIDOR TO HELP REINFORCE A IDENTITY FOR THE CITY OF STEWART AND A SENSE OF PLACE WITH THE PLANT MATERIAL , SO WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME WE ALREADY SPENT A LOT OF TIME OUT HERE, BUT, UM, MAKING SURE TO IDENTIFY WHAT SPECIES ARE OUT THERE AND REALLY ALWAYS CALLING BACK TO ONE THAT'S BEING USED WITHIN THE CITY. THIS PROGRAM WILL BE A PROP VOLUNTARY PROGRAM THE C R A PROGRAM FOR CONTEXT WHERE THE CITY WILL THE CRM. SORRY WE'LL ENCOURAGE PROPERTY OWNERS TO PARTICIPATE IS COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY, BUT BECAUSE AS I MENTIONED ANY SAVVAS MENTIONED WERE MAXIMIZED OUT ON THE RIGHT OF WAY. SO THIS IS A CONTRIBUTION THAT'S GOING TO COME FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER
[00:10:02]
A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS. AS FAR AS THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, WHICH WE'RE FOCUSING ON TODAY, THERE'S THREE MAIN ELEMENTS THAT WE'RE CHANGING ABOUT THE RECOMMENDING A CHANGE TO THE CODE ON ONE IS TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS THAT WE ARE UPDATE SOME DEFINITIONS AND WE NEED ALONG THE WAY PROVIDE THE STANDARDS TO APPLICANTS SO THAT THEY HAVE A CLEAR EXPECTATION OF WHAT IS REQUIRED, UM, AND THEN ALSO ESTABLISHED THE PROCEDURES FOR THAT. SO FOR RIGHT OF WHERE THIS WAS OUR EXISTING RIGHT OF WHERE DEFINITION IN THE CODE TODAY. WE WANT TO BRING THAT INTO, UM, SOMETHING THAT'S A LITTLE BROADER. THAT IS ADDRESSES. MORE OF WHAT A RIGHT AWAY CAN BE PARTICULARLY ADDING THE WORDS FOR ALI WALKWAY, WHICH ARE NOT AS EXPLICITLY DESCRIBED HERE. IT'S ALSO GOING TO THIS DEFINITION IS CONSISTENT WITH FLORIDA STATUTE. SO THAT WAS THE ONE OF THE FIRST PIECES OF CODE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE'RE BRINGING A PROPOSED CHANGE ON THE OTHER IS MORE THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE CODE REQUIREMENTS THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING ARE NESTLED WITHIN THE STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN STREETS. SO WITHIN THE CODE WITHIN THIS SECTION HERE, THERE'S ALREADY A TABLE THAT IDENTIFIES SPECIFIC SETBACKS, DEPENDING ON THE STREET. SO NESTLED IN THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THERE'S NOT JUST A SPECIFIC SET BACK, BUT ALSO SPECIFIC EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN WITHIN THAT ACT. SO JUST FOR CONTEXT, THE EXISTING STANDARDS TODAY RUNS FROM WEST OCEAN BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS 20 FT SETBACK ON EITHER SIDE. FOR US ONE. SO WE'VE SLICED OUT JUST A PORTION OF THAT SPECIFIC AREA WE'VE BUILT GROWN IT TO THE NORTH, JUST A LITTLE BIT, TOO JOAN JEFFERSON AND THEY WERE USING THIS DIXIE CUT OFF ROAD AT THE SOUTH AS THE SOUTHERN LIMIT FOR THESE RECOMMENDED CHANGES. THE CONTEXT FOR THAT IS THAT THIS IS WHERE THE RIGHT OF WAY WITHIN US . ONE IS THE MOST CONSTRAINED. THIS IS WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 100 FT. RIGHT OF WAY NORTH OF THAT, AND SOUTH OF THAT THE RIGHT OF WAY STARTS TO GROW, SO IT'S A DIFFERENT CONTEXT HAS NEEDS TO HAVE DIFFERENT. UM UM, GOALS THE SAME GOALS ABOUT WIDENING SIDEWALKS CAN BE ACCOMMODATED WITHIN THAT RIGHT OF WAY RATHER THAN ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. UM JUST SAY, UM WE ALSO START TO GET OUT OF THE CRE , WHICH IS A START TO BECOME A CHANGING POINT. UM WHEN YOU MOVE OUT OF THE REMOVED FURTHER SOUTH AMONG US ONE SO THOSE STANDARDS ESSENTIALLY THE BIG PICTURE IS WE WANT TO REQUIRE WHEN REDEVELOPMENT HAPPENS THAT THERE IS A 10 FT SIDEWALK AT THE FRONT OF PROPERTIES RIGHT NOW, THERE'S A 7 FT SIDEWALK. MANY CASES THAT 7 FT. SIDEWALK IS OBSTRUCTED BY UTILITY POLES. SIGN EGE, YOU KNOW, SIGNAL AND MASKED POLLS.SO IT'S INADEQUATE FOR PROVIDING THE WITH YOU REALLY NEED TO ALLOW FOR MOBILITY IN THAT AREA , AND THEN WE'RE ALSO REQUIRING THAT THE SHADE TREES BE PLANTED ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALKS, UM, SO THAT THE SHADE TREES CAN PROVIDE JADE TO THE PEDESTRIANS. UM. THIS IS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THOSE WORDS. UM WE WANT TO PROVIDE A LOT OF, UM, ABILITY FOR APPLICANTS AND INFILL DEVELOPMENT TO DO IT IN A WAY THAT IS COMPLEMENTARY TO THEIR USES. SO FOR EXAMPLE, YOU KNOW THIS MAY BE AN ATTRACTIVE SAID, UH, SET OF SOLUTIONS FOR A MORE , UM, COMMERCIAL USE RIGHT A STORE WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO UTILIZE THAT EXISTING 7 FT SIDEWALK. ADD 3 FT AND THEN THEN PROVIDE SHADE TREES JUST ADJACENT TO THAT, UM, THE OTHER EXAMPLE HERE MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATE IF YOU'RE A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND YOU WANT TO PROMOTE SIDEWALK DINING. OR A MORE ACTIVATED USE NEXT TO YOUR YOUR BUILDING, AND IN THAT CASE, YOU MAY PROVIDE ANOTHER PATH ADJACENT TO YOUR BUILDING, AND THEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BECOME MORE LIKE ISLANDS BETWEEN THOSE PATHS. AND THEN, IF IT RESIDENTIAL USE COMES IN ALONG THAT CORRIDOR, THIS MIGHT BE THE MORE APPROPRIATE SOLUTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO SHIELD THAT RESIDENTIAL USE FROM THE BUSY TRAFFIC ALONG US ONE WITH LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDING ATTRACTIVE FRONT DOOR ALONG THAT CORRIDOR. WHY. UM, WE MAKE REFERENCE TO THE FACT THAT BUILDING ENTRANCES NEED TO BE AT INTERVALS. UM WE ALSO MAKE REFERENCE TO THE FRONTAGE TYPES , WHICH ARE IDENTIFIED IN SOME
[00:15:04]
OF THE SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS THAT WE HAVE WITHIN THE C. R A TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE ARE CALLED OUT BY REFERENCE. UM AND THEN WE ALSO PROVIDE THIS MECHANISM FOR DEDICATION. SOME PROPERTY OWNERS. I WOULD LIKE TO NOT HAVE THAT, UM THEY LIABILITY OF HAVING 3 FT OF SIDEWALK ON THEIR PROPERTY, SO THERE'S A MECHANISM HERE FOR THAT DEDICATION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY. UM AND THEN THE CITY WOULD HAVE THAT, UM, THAT PROPERTY BE PART OF THEIRS. THEY WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO USE THE PROPERTY FOR THEIR DENSITY CALCULATIONS THERE. SETBACK CALCULATIONS DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING ABOUT THEIR UM, DEVELOPMENT, UH, RIGHTS THAT THEY HAVE AT THAT MOMENT, BUT IT ALLOWS FOR THAT SIDEWALK TO BE WITHIN THE CITY OF CITIES RIGHT OF WAY. AND THEN WITH THIS RECOMMENDATION, WE ALSO PROVIDED PARKING CODE RELIEF. NOW THIS TIES MORE INTO THE PROGRAM FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURES THAT ARE OUT THERE WHERE THIS PROVIDES A MECHANISM FOR THEM TO HAVE A PARKING CREDIT. UM, YOU CAN IMAGINE SOME OF THE EXISTING USERS OUT THERE TODAY. WHO DON'T WHO MAY HAVE AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF PARKING ON THEIR SITE. THEY MAY WANT TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY . I'LL GO BACK TO AN EXAMPLE. FROM THAT AREA. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN SEE THAT SOME OF THESE SOME OF THESE USERS HAVE MORE PARKING THAN THEY REALLY NEED AND SO TRANSITIONING SOME OF THOSE EXISTING ASPHALT SPACES TO GREEN TREES THAT CAN COMPLEMENT THEIR BUSINESSES AND THE SIDEWALK ENVIRONMENT IS A BENEFIT TO THEM , AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THEY ALSO INTENSIFIES AND THEY CAN SEE THAT, UM THEY CAN GET CREDIT FOR THOSE PARKING SPACES THAT THEY LOST AND THOSE WERE TIED INTO THEIR DEVELOPMENT. THAT WOULD BE ONLY IN THE MAP THE NUMBER OF SPACES THAT WERE TRANSITIONED TO GREEN SPACE OR A 10% REDUCTION IN THEIR REQUIRED PARKING, SO IT'S PRETTY NOMINAL. BUT IT COULD BE THE BIG DIFFERENCE FOR SOME APPLICATIONS AND WHICHEVER IS GREATER IN THAT CASE. THE OTHER ELEMENT THAT WE WANTED TO ADDRESS IN THE SIDE. THE URBAN HIGHWAY DESIGNATION. WISH I HAD A MAP IN HERE SHOULD SHOW YOU WHERE THAT IS. THAT URBAN HIGHWAY DESIGNATION IS A LOT OF THESE PARCELS UP HERE. CLOSER TO DOWNTOWN AND A LONGER ENTRANCE TO DOWNTOWN, RIGHT. THAT DESIGNATION. IT'S ALSO FURTHER NORTH. UM ALONG US ONE. WE WANTED TO TWEAK THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING A SMALL CHANGE TO WHAT'S REALLY, ESSENTIALLY, THEY'RE BUILT TO ZONE. IT'S A MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM BUILDING AREA FOR THOSE PROPERTIES RIGHT NOW. THEY ARE REQUIRED IN THOSE PARCELS TO BUILD A THEY'RE BUILDING WITHIN 15 TO 20 FT OF THEIR SETBACK. WHICH IS REALLY CLOSE FOR US. ONE CONDITION, PARTICULARLY WHEN THERE IS A LARGE UTILITY LINES ALONG THERE, TOO, SO WE WANT TO ACTUALLY PROVIDE THEM A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY AND STRETCH THAT OUT TO 40 FT. IT WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED TO PUT ALL OF THEIR PARKING TO THE REAR INTO THE SIDES OF BUILDINGS. THERE WOULD STILL ALL THE EXISTING LIMITS ON WHERE PARKING CAN GO REMAIN. BUT WHAT IT ALLOWS YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO IS SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THIS CONDITION HERE, AND WE DON'T WANT TO CLOSE THIS OFFICE AS A DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY. SO RIGHT HERE THIS IS A 40 FT DIMENSION YOU SEE, CALLED OUT ON A SIX LANE ROADWAY SECTION. AND ALTHOUGH YOU HAVE A LOT OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC HERE OVER IN THIS AREA THEY STILL MANAGED TO PROMOTE A WALKABLE DOWNTOWN, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND THIS KIND OF PATTERN ADJACENT TOUR DOWNTOWN AREAS, WHICH IS THE INTENT OF THE URBAN HIGHWAY DESIGNATION COULD BE INAPPROPRIATE SOLUTION SO THAT PROVIDING A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBILITY AND THAT BUILD TO ZONE WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE LANDSCAPING, MORE TREES TO BE A LONG CORRIDOR. THIS IS THE LAST PIECE OF CODE LANGUAGE TO REVIEW UM, THE PROCEDURES. SO WE MENTIONED THE, UH, THE DEDICATION OF LAND AS PART OF AN OPTION FOR THOSE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS. WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS A PROCEDURE IN PLACE WHERE THAT CAN BE ACHIEVED. UM RIGHT AWAY DESIGNATION HAS BEEN ADDED TO OUR MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION. IT'S RECOMMENDED TO BE AND. AGAIN I MENTIONED THAT WHEN THAT WOULD BE RECORDED THAT IT WOULD ALSO ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE TO USE THAT FORMER LAW OR LAND AREA FOR THE PURPOSES OF THEIR LAND USE AND ZONING CALCULATIONS, INCLUDING DENSITY IN THE NECESSARY SETBACKS. UM AND THEN AGAIN SOME LANGUAGE IN HERE, REINFORCING THAT THEY WOULD ONLY RECEIVE THAT PARKING SPACE. CREDIT IF THEY'RE IMPLEMENTING THE MASTER PLAN, WHICH CALLS FOR THE SHAPE THE[00:20:06]
TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY. UM THIS IS A LITTLE CONTEXT OF WHERE WE ARE TODAY. UM WE WENT TO THE CRB ON AUGUST 1ST AND WE RECEIVED A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE PROGRAM. UM, AND NO COMMENTS ON THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. WOMEN THROUGH THOSE TWO WE HAD THE L P A TODAY AND WE HOPE TO GO FORWARD WITH CRM AND THE CITY COMMISSION. ON AUGUST 28TH SLOW DOWN NOW, UM, WE'RE HOPING THAT WE CAN HAVE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. UM, AND ANY COMMENTS OR FEEDBACK FROM FROM THIS BOARD SO WE CAN INCORPORATE THOSE THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ASSUMING THAT WAS THE ONLY PRESENTATION. ALRIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? MM HMM. OKAY. I DON'T THINK SO. BOARD MEMBERS. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS YES. UM FIRST QUESTION IS BASICALLY THE REDUCTION OF PARKING SPACES. LOSS OF SPACE IS AN ISSUE AND WE'RE LOSING SPACES AND I UNDERSTAND IT'S CERTAINLY AESTHETICALLY BEAUTIFUL, AND IT'S REALLY A NICE CONCEPT. BUT NOW YOU'RE TAKING THINGS AWAY. WELL, AND IT WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY VOLUNTARY, SO THERE MIGHT BE SOME PROPERTY OWNERS WHO SAY ABSOLUTELY NO WAY I HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM. I'M NOT GOING TO PARTICIPATE AT THIS TIME. IT'S 100% OF VOLUNTARY PROGRAM.UM IF, BUT I SAID THERE ARE SOME PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG HERE THAT ARE EXCEEDING THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES THAT THEY HAVE, AND THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE THEM A WAY OF BRINGING SOME MORE GREEN TO THE SITE WHERE THE RIGHT NOW MANY OF THE PARCELS ALONG THIS SECTION, THEY WERE BUILT AND OCCUPIED BEFORE THERE WAS A LANDSCAPE CODE AND SO THAT THEY DON'T MEET CURRENT CODE AND THEY'VE STAYED THE SAME WAY THROUGH CHANGE OF USE OR CONTINUED USE, AND THERE'S VERY HAVEN'T SEEN THAT CHANGE OF THE NEW CODE BEING ADAPTED IN THEM, OR EVEN THIS CODE, YOU KNOW THE SO THIS IS A MECHANISM TO REALLY START TO MOVE THAT DIRECTION ON SOME OF THESE OLDER PARCELS AND PLAZAS. SO THEN AGAIN, IT IS A PUBLIC PRIVATE. AGREEMENT HERE IN THE CITY AND THE RESIDENTS, OWNERS OR LARGE COMPLEXES, SO. IN THE FACT THAT IT'S VOLUNTARY AND I READ OVER THE AGREEMENT. I DON'T KNOW IF ALL OF YOU READ IT. I DON'T KNOW THAT I'D BE WILLING TO SIGN IT. I MEAN, A LOT OF THE ONUS IS PUT ON THE OWNER. OR THE COMPLEX. THE TREES ARE COMING FROM THE CITY OR BEING DONATED BY DIFFERENT AGENCIES, BUT ALL THE OWNERS OF KEEPING THEM AND YOU KNOW, FEEDING THEM MAKING SURE THAT THAT'S ALL ON THE OWNER. SO WHAT I GUESS WHAT I'M GETTING TO IS NOW YOU HAVE MAYBE 10 OUT OF 20 PEOPLE WHO SAY NO, I DON'T WANT TO SIGN THIS. SO WHAT? I THINK WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE IS THAT THE LOSS OF CONTINUITY, CONTINUITY AND KEEPING THIS SIDEWALK GOING ? HMM SO THAT'S THE QUESTION AND MY LAST QUESTION I'M GOING TO BRING OVER TO YOU IS SOME OF THE TREES. AND AESTHETICALLY. THEY LOOK BEAUTIFUL, BUT THIS IS FLORIDA AND IT'S NOT REALLY IF A HURRICANE IS GOING TO HIT US WHEN AND SOME OF THEM ARE FROM WHAT RESEARCH I DID OR NOT SUSTAINABLE. I MEAN, ALL OF THE TREES THAT ARE USED IN THIS SHOULD BE CERTAINLY SUSTAINABLE TREES IN THE CASE OF VERY SEVERE STORM OR HURRICANE AND THEN KIND OF PIGGYBACK OFF OF THAT. CAN YOU SHARE AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE THIS HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED BEFORE WHERE YOU PUT IT? LIKE YOU SAID IT WAS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE CITY AND WHATNOT. AND HOW IT PLAYED OUT.
DO YOU HAVE AN EXAMPLE? YEAH I MEAN, THERE'S SOME EXAMPLES. MAYBE NOT THE EXACT STRUCTURE THAT WE'VE PRESENTED HERE BECAUSE AGAIN WE'RE DOING A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IS HARDER. UM AS FAR AS THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WERE REQUIRING A DEDICATION OF SIDEWALK OR VOLUNTARY DEDICATION OF SIDEWALK AND WE'RE REQUIREMENT TO WIDEN THE SIDEWALK AND PLANT ALONG THE CORRIDOR. THERE'S LOTS OF EXAMPLES THAT WE CAN POINT TO ONE THAT'S ALONG A AGAIN ANOTHER REALLY BUSY THOROUGHFARE WHERE YOU'RE TRYING TO MOVE THE NEEDLE OVER TIME, UM WOULD BE BROWARD BOULEVARD. BROWARD BOULEVARD IS A MASSIVE ROAD THAT'S VERY HARD TO GET AROUND ON IF YOU'RE WALKING OR BIKING OR EVEN DRIVING AND OVER TIME THEIR LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WERE UPDATED, AND THEY HAVE BEEN REQUIRING THAT CHANGE OVER TIME.
SO TO YOUR POINT ABOUT CONTINUITY OVER TIME, YES, YOU COULD. AND UP WITH THIS PARCEL THAT HAS 10 FT. OF SIDEWALK AND THIS PARCEL THAT HAS UM, 6 FT OF SIDEWALK. YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT CONTINUOUS YET AGAIN. THIS IS THE CITY. WE'RE IN THIS FOR THE LONG HAUL. WE'RE NOT THE ONE TIME IN AND OUT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. SO UM THE VISION IS LONG AND SO, ESPECIALLY IN
[00:25:02]
CONJUNCTION WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. OVER TIME, THEY'LL BE THAT CONTINUITY , AND THERE'S SOME EXAMPLES ALONG THAT AND IN THE REPORT. UM WITH THE IMAGE OF BROWARD BOULEVARD. HOW OVER TIME THAT WHEN REDEVELOPMENT HAPPENED, THOSE WIDER SIDEWALKS CAME TOGETHER AND IN THAT CASE, IT WAS THE SAME PUBLIC PRIVATE WERE PROPERTY OWNERS HAD TO DECIDE WHAT THEY WERE GONNA AGREE. THERE'S ACTUALLY EXAMPLES WHERE THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE KIND OF LIKE, LIKE A, UM LIKE A WHAT WE HAVE TODAY WITH STRATACOM, WHERE IT WAS RIGHT UP AGAINST THE RIGHT OF WAY. AND THEN THAT STRUCTURE YOU KNOW, FOR WHATEVER REASON LOST, IT'S VALIDATED OVER TIME, AND THEN IT WAS REBUILT. ANOTHER STRUCTURE COMMERCIAL BUILDING WAS BUILT. 20 FT BACK, AND NOW YOU HAVE ROOM FOR THE SHADE TREES AND THE LANDSCAPING. UM YOU KNOW, IN NO WAY THIS IS TARGETING ANY OF OUR HISTORIC STRUCTURES THAT ARE ALONG THOSE THEY DONE A BEAUTIFUL JOB. BUT JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW YES , IT IT WAS A MEANT THAT WOULDN'T REDEVELOPMENT HAPPENED . EITHER BUILDING WENT FURTHER BACK OR IN THIS CASE IN OUR CASES, MOST OFTEN, IT WOULD MEAN THAT THE BUILDING WOULD COME CLOSER. UM IN THIS PUBLIC PRIVATE AGREEMENT. IS THERE NOW YOU'RE TAKING BASICALLY FOOTAGE AWAY. IS THERE SOME SORT OF TAX INCENTIVE? TO THE OWNERS TO SAY OKAY, I'LL COULD I COULD LIVE WITH THIS, BUT IS THERE A TAX INCENTIVE FOR THEM TO DO IT? NOT AS WHEN IT GETS THERE ANY TYPE OF INCENTIVE FOR THE OWNERS. SO THE INCENTIVE IS THAT PARKING CREDIT IF FOR THOSE REDEVELOPMENT SITES, UM AND FOR AGAIN THAT THERE'S TWO DIFFERENT THINGS HAPPENING, THERE'S THE PROGRAM, WHICH IS MORE ABOUT THE EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS. AND THEN THERE'S THE REDEVELOPMENT SCENARIO. AND SO IN THE REDEVELOPMENT SCENARIO, THIS IS OUTLINING WHERE SOME OF THEIR EXISTING LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARE GOING TO GO, YOU KNOW, AND A RELATIVELY MINOR INCREASED POTENTIALLY THREE ADDITIONAL FEED OF SIDEWALK. BUT THEY WOULD ALL YOU KNOW AGAIN. THEY WOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO ALWAYS INCLUDE THAT, UM, LAND AS PART OF THEIR ZONING CALCULATIONS, UM, AND THEIR DENSITY CALCULATIONS OR SETBACK CALCULATIONS, SO THEY'RE NOT LOSING AS FAR AS ANYTHING AS FAR AS DEVELOPABLE RIGHTS. POSITIVE IF JODI, YOU'RE SORRY USING FIRST NAMES, AND IF, UM IF YOU BOTH WOULD LIKE TO ADD IT TO ANYTHING THAT I'VE SAID SO FAR.DON'T FORGET THE AESTHETIC BENEFITS TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. RIGHT I AGREE. I THINK IT'S REALLY BEAUTIFUL. MY CONCERN WOULD BE ABLE TO A LITTLE BIT OF I THINK WHAT SHE ECHOED. YOU HAVE LIKE, DOESN'T AND THEN YOU HAVE THREE OF THE DON'T AND THEN YOU LOOK REALLY WEIRD. THAT WOULD BE MY A LITTLE BIT MORE. HOPEFULLY THAT THOSE TWO THAT DO IT TO ALSO BECOME THE OH, I NEED TO STEP UP MY GAME. I MEAN, AND YOU SEE THAT IN SOME OF THE PLAZA'S ALREADY HAPPENING AROUND TOWN WHERE THEY PAINTED AND THEY GOT NO ROOF. AND NOW THE PLAZA DOWN THE STREET LIKE OH, MY GOD, WE NEED TO PAINT AND YOU KNOW, WE STRIVE TO YOU KNOW, SO UM, THAT MIGHT BE A MOTIVATING FACTOR AS WELL. HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I KNOW YOU'VE DONE SOME WORKSHOPS WITH THE PUBLIC ON THIS. DID YOU WAS THERE INPUT FROM THE ACTUAL PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG, SO WE WANTED TO THAT WE HAVE THIS QUESTION AT THE SIERRA AS WELL, UM, THE YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, DO YOU BRING THIS TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND AT GET THERE AND PUT FIRST AND THEN WE DON'T HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THE BOARDS THAT YOU KNOW IN THE WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE FIRST WE HAD THE SUPPORT OF THE SIERRA THE L P A IN THE CITY COMMISSION BEFORE WE DID EXTENSIVE OUTREACH WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS AS PART OF THE PROGRAM, IF EVERYTHING IS ACCEPTED, WILL DO A KICK OFF MEETING WITH ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS. AND DO SOME TARGETED OUTREACH TO TRY TO GET THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS INTERESTED AND SEE THEIR THEIR TEMPERAMENT FOR THIS PROGRAM. ANY QUESTIONS ANYMORE. NO, IT'S FINE. OKAY AND IT'S JUST BACK TO THE TREES. I MEAN, IS THERE WAS NOT WRITTEN IN STONE ABOUT THE TREES I REALLY WOULD PREFER. I MEAN, THESE ARE TAXPAYER DOLLARS THAT ARE MADE, YOU KNOW, IN ONE BAD STORM, AND WE' TREES. WITHIN AGAIN, WE MIGHT BE REPLACING TREES OR THE HOMEOWNER WOULD BE REPLACING TREES, RIGHT? I MEAN, WE WOULD. YEAH THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, THE TREE SELECTIONS WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH WITH THE LUCY TO PLACIDO AND ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECTS, AND WE DID AGAIN OUTREACH WITH THOSE COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER GROUPS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THAT EXPERIENCE OF PLANTING WITHIN THE CITY OF STEWART. AND WHAT WORKED. WHAT DIDN'T WORK? UM OAK TREES ARE ALREADY ON THAT CORRIDOR, AND THEY'RE DOING WELL WHERE THEY HAVE THE SPACE TO DO WELL, SO WE'RE ONLY RECOMMENDING THOSE TREES WHERE THEY HAVE THE SPACE TO DO WELL. UM WE WANTED TO GO WITH AS MANY TREES THAT COULD PROVIDE THE MOST SHADE AND THAT THAT'S REALLY ARE BIG TICKET ITEM THERE AS FAR AS SHADE GOES, UM, THAT BEING
[00:30:04]
CONTEXT SENSITIVE, THOUGH WE ALSO REALIZED THAT WE NEEDED TO ADDRESS SOME CONDITIONS WHERE WE'RE UNDER UTILITY LINES. WE'VE GOT SOME MASSIVE UTI LEADING LINES OUT THERE. AND THAT'S WHERE THE PIGEON PLAN AND THE AND THE SILVER BUTTON WOODS COME IN. UM INSIDE THE MEDIAN. WE ALSO IDENTIFIED. WE WANTED TO ADD A PALM TO THOSE EXISTING MEETING PLANTINGS THAT WOULD ADD HEIGHT AND SOME CONSISTENCY WITH THE REST OF THE CITY. WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME TALKING ABOUT LETHAL BRONZING, WHICH IS A DISEASE THAT'S AFFECTING A LOT OF OUR LOCAL POEMS. UM AND UNFORTUNATELY, IT REALLY KIND OF BECAUSE THIS IS A TAXPAYER PROJECT. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE ARE REALLY RESILIENT TREES, AND THAT'S WHERE THE ROYAL PALM REALLY DID COME TO THE SURFACE IS THE MOST RESILIENT. UM, FOR THAT, UM RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE MEDIANS WERE ALSO RECOMMENDING A FLOWERING TREE FOR THE MEDIANS AGAIN. THAT WAS JUST IN FILLING FOR, UM, WHERE THERE'S SPACE BETWEEN THOSE ROYAL PALMS IN THE EXISTING OAKS THAT ARE OUT THERE . THAT'S A PURPLE TAB, OR, UH, PEOPLE TRUMPET TREE, THE CITY'S PLANTED THOSE ALONG OCEAN AND THEY HAVE BEEN GREEN ALL YEAR AND DOING WELL. AND SO WE WANTED TO BUILD OFF OF THAT STRENGTH.IT ALSO BUILDS OFF OF THE PURPLE THAT WE'VE GOTTEN SOME OTHER AREAS ALONG US ONE. I FEEL LIKE I'M FORGETTING ONE WAY. OH, YES , THERE'S A FOXTAIL PALM AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT USE WHERE WE'VE GOT SOME EXISTING USERS. ALONG THE CORRIDOR, WHERE , UM, OAK TREES OR REALLY, ANY KIND OF TREE THAT'S GOING TO DRAW IS REALLY NOT COMPATIBLE TO THEIR USES. AND THE LIMITED SPACE THEY HAVE, UM, SO THAT'S AGAIN A SPECIAL TREE THAT'S ONLY RECOMMENDED AND IN THOSE CONDITIONS FOR THOSE EXISTING PROPERTIES AND THOSE EXISTING USERS, AND THAT'S THE FOXTAIL PALM AGAIN. THE CITY'S PLANTED LOTS OF FOXTAIL PALMS AND CONSTRAINED CONDITIONS. YOU CAN SEE THEM ON PALM BEACH ROAD. AND UM, A COUPLE OF OTHER LOCATIONS AROUND TOWN AND THEY'VE BEEN DOING WELL. THEY'VE HAD SOME SUCCESS WITH THOSE OVER TIME. AND AS FAR AS MAINTENANCE GOES ON, THEY DO REQUIRE FOR THE FERTILIZATION EQUATION, ALY, BUT AGAIN, THEY'VE BEEN REALLY RESILIENT IN THE STORMS, AND SO THEY'RE THEY'VE BEEN HAPPY WITH THOSE PLANTINGS OVER TIME. SO WITH THOSE MEETINGS THAT YOU'VE HAD WITH HOMEOWNERS AND COMPLEXES AND WHATNOT, DID YOU GET A LARGE PERCENTAGE THAT YOU FELT WOULD BE WILLING TO JOIN IN ON THIS VENTURE? CLARIFY ON THAT , UM, THERE ACTUALLY AREN'T A LOT OF HOME OWNERS ALONG THIS SECTION IS REALLY ENTIRELY COMMERCIAL. ALL THESE PARCELS ARE BUSINESSES OR COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. THERE IS ONE COMPLEX IN THERE NOW THAT IS, UM UM RENTAL UNITS, ONE OF THE OLDER MOTELS THAT WAS A RENTAL UNIT PROPERTY. BUT AGAIN, IT'S A MULTI FAMILY ONE. WE HAVEN'T DONE THE OUTREACH WITH THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNERS, SO WE'LL KNOW ONCE WE ONCE WE GET TO THAT POINT, IF WE CAN GET TO THAT POINT, UM WHAT THEIR TEMPERAMENT IS THAT THAT WAS PART OF THE REASON WHY WE INCLUDED, THOUGH SOME OF THE BUSINESS ADVOCACY GROUPS IN DOWNTOWN SO WE CAN GET THEIR PERSPECTIVE. AS FAR AS INCENTIVES GO, THEY WERE ENCOURAGED. THEY HELPED TO RECOMMEND AND ENCOURAGE THE IDEA OF RECOGNIZING A PARKING CREDIT IN THE L. D. R S. AND UM, AGAIN , JUST, YOU KNOW, REALLY EMPHASIZING SOME OF THE ADVANTAGES TO THE LOOK OF THEIR BUSINESSES OVER TIME. THANK YOU. YES I HAVE A QUESTION. MY CONCERN IS WITH MEDIAN PLANTING BECAUSE I UTILIZE US ONE AND I SENT LUCY QUESTION A LOT. AND RIGHT NOW IT'S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE ESPECIALLY TO GET OUT OF SENTENCES. KRISTEN. PART OF THE PROBLEM IS ALREADY UM, VISIBILITY. SO I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THAT. UM IS IT PRIMARILY WITH THE LOWER KIND OF SHRUBS REALLY HAS TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT SPACE IS SO HARD TO GET INTO BECAUSE OF SPACE IS SMALLER YOU. YOU ALMOST ALWAYS HAVE TO COME AND REST FOR A MINUTE WITH THE TRAFFIC BEING SO FAST. YEAH IT IS GOOD THAT THE SHADE TREES WILL SLOW THE TRAFFIC DOWN. YEAH SO THAT WAS KIND OF COMPENSATE.
BUT I'M STILL CONCERNED ABOUT MEDIUM PLANTING, BECAUSE SOMETIMES WHEN I DRIVE ON US WHEN I GET A LITTLE FRUSTRATED AND LIKE THERE'S THIS CITY UNDERSTAND THAT THE TREES THE MEDIAN PLANT IN OBSTRUCT THE VISIBILITY WHEN YOU HAVE TO CROSS OVER BECAUSE EVEN RIGHT THERE BY THE HOTEL JUST PAST BANK OF AMERICA. WHAT IS THAT HOTEL RIGHT THERE? RIGHT BY WHERE THE U HAUL RENTAL IS OKAY SO HARD. YEAH SO HARD TO WHEN. WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO CROSS OVER ON THAT DAY ONE A CUT OFF ROAD. IT'S ALMOST EXPECT DANGEROUS IS COMING SOFT. SO IF THE MEDIAN IS
[00:35:04]
NOT KEPT PRECISELY, I MEAN LIKE TWO INCHES AND IT AFFECTS THE VISIBILITY, RIGHT SO TYPICALLY, WHAT YOU RUN INTO IS HEDGE AND GROUND COVER GROWTH THAT'S GOTTEN BEYOND THE VISIBILITY LIMITS, SO THIS PROGRAM DOESN'T RECOMMEND ANY SPECIFIC GROUND COVERS, UM, IN PART BECAUSE THAT IS BECAME GET VERY SPECIFIC, AND THOSE GROUND COVERS MAY CHANGE MORE OVERTIME AND, UM, YOU KNOW, SO THAT'S THAT'S PART OF WE DIDN'T ADDRESS GROUND COVERS IN THIS, SO THERE'S NO SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THAT. UM THERE ARE REGULATIONS. THERE ARE THERE IS LANGUAGE IN THERE ABOUT CLEAR HEIGHT AT THE VEHICLE, SO FOR ANY BRANCHES THEY WOULD NEED TO REQUIRED FROM BEING IF THEY OBSTRUCT THAT THAT SIGHTLINE VIEW IN THE IN THE MEDIANS. UM, WHEN THE MEDIANS GET NARROW, UM BASICALLY LESS THAN 8. FT F D O T REQUIRES THAT, UM ANY ANY PLANTINGS B IN THEIR B FRANGIBLE AND THEREFORE YOU ONLY END UP WITH THESE WHICH MEANS BREAKABLE . UM, THESE REALLY SMALL NARROW . UM UH, PLANTINGS, WHEREAS WHEN THE MEDIA IS LARGER, SAY 15 FT OR SO THAT'S WHERE YOU CAN HAVE A TREE POTENTIALLY LIKE A SMALLER TREE OR THE ROYAL PALMS . AND SO THAT'S THAT'S ONLY THOSE ARE THE ONLY PLACES WHERE THOSE ARE RECOMMENDED. WE CAN ABSOLUTELY IN THE MASTER PLAN, TAKE A LOOK AT THAT INTERSECTION AND MAKE SURE THAT THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE IN LINE WITH YOUR CONCERNS. IS THAT ADDRESS ALL THE QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. PATIENCE ALRIGHT, WELL, YOU'RE UP THEN. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO IT. I THINK ONE OF THE ISSUES IS WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS, UH THEY'RE THEY'RE GONNA DONATE RIGHT AWAY. AND THEY'RE GOING TO GET TO KEEP ALL THEIR CURRENT PARKING RIGHT. BUT WE NEED TO TELL THEM. WHAT OCCURS THAT THEY LOSE THAT, FOR INSTANCE, A CHANGE OF USE IS THAT GOING TO CAUSE A MINUTE LOSE THAT REQUIREMENT FOR EXTRA PARKING RIGHT? WHAT IF THEY WON'T EXTEND THE BUILDING BY 10. DOES THAT MEAN? THEY GIVE UP THAT? RIGHT? UH I THINK WE NEED TO LOOK AT IT. A LOT OF TIMES WE PUT DOWN WHAT YOU CAN DO. I THINK THIS NEEDS TO BE SOMETHING THAT VERY CLEARLY SO THE PROPERTY OWNER KNOWS WHAT HE'S GOING TO LOSE, RIGHT. SHOULD HE DO? ABC DID RIGHT? IT'S GOING TO BE IMPORTANT BECAUSE DOWN THE LINE IT'S GOING TO OCCUR, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GET IN A LOT OF DISAGREEMENTS AND CONFUSION.OKAY SO THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS TO KNOW EXACTLY OKAY. UH, IT GETS INTO. YOU KNOW WHAT IF HE WANTS TO WIDEN HIS DRIVEWAY, RIGHT? OKAY THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE SMALL BUILDINGS AND STUFF OVER TIME. THEY MAY WANT TO DO. UM I KNOW THEY'RE GONNA HAVE LIMITS LIKE THERE IS IN THE CODE. ONCE YOU START TO DO CERTAIN THINGS, YOU'RE GOING TO LOSE. AND YOU HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH TO GET YOUR BUILDING PERMIT AND DO PLANNED, RIGHT AND YOU HAVE TO UPDATE RIGHT? BUT WHEN IT COMES TO A SMALL PARCELS OR SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE USING THAT GLADYS DONATE MAYBE A GAS STATIONS GOT LOT OF EXITS, RIGHT? SO HE GETS THE APPROVAL. THEN HE WANTS TO MAKE SOME MODIFICATIONS, RIGHT? WELL, HE LOSES THAT PARKING OR DOES IT, KEEP IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU'LL LOSE IT FOR YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN? SO IF THE PARKING IF THERE IS A YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT A SCENARIO WHERE THERE'S EXISTING THAT'S A PROPERTY OWNER WANTED TO DEDICATE THE 13 FT TO ACHIEVE THE LANDSCAPING AND THE SIDEWALK , BUT THERE'S STILL PARKING IN THAT LOCATION. CORRECT SO THEY WOULD LOSE BECAUSE IT PHYSICALLY DOESN'T FIT. YOU KNOW THE PARKING THAT IS IN THAT LOCATION , BUT THAT PROPERTY WOULD RECEIVE A CREDIT FOR THOSE SPACES LOST AND THAT WOULD RUN WITH THAT PARCEL. SO IT WOULDN'T BE LOST WITH A CHANGE OF USE. I AGREE, BUT YOU DON'T KNOW. OKAY? OTHER WORDS, THERE ARE CONDITIONS THAT HE'S GOING TO LOSE IT. ALL RIGHT. I'M JUST SAYING IS INSTEAD OF HAVING A DECISION ON WHETHER OR NOT HE LOSES IT. YOU CAN PUT SOME STATEMENTS IN THERE THAT HE CAN REMAIN PARKING SUBJECT TO CHANGES OF EXPLOITING OKAY ONLY BECAUSE. YEAH OVER THE YEARS. THAT'S WHAT IT COMES BACK. IT'S JUST AN INTERPRETATION. SO THAT'S THAT'S MY ONLY COMMENT. YOU KNOW, ON THAT THE OTHER THING IS WHEN WE NOW THE OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEGETATION, RIGHT? IF THEY IF THEY DEDICATE THAT LAND THERE, MAYBE SCENARIOS WHERE THE CITY WOULD TAKE ON SOME OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THAT. IF THEY DON'T DEDICATE THE LAND, THEY WOULD ABSOLUTELY BE RESPONSIBLE
[00:40:03]
FOR THAT, BECAUSE ONE OF THE ISSUES BECOME AS ONE. IF IT'S NEAR THE FRONTAGE, ALL THOSE TREES GOTTA BE PRETTY GOOD SIZE BECAUSE YOU CAN'T PUT THEM IN. YOU KNOW, SIGHT DISTANCES UP.THERE IT IS. 7 8 FT, RIGHT TO HAVE A SMALL CRUNK AND SEE AROUND THOSE TREES TEND TO BLOW IT OUT A LITTLE BIT, RIGHT? AND I SAY THIS IS HAPPENED TO ME A FEW TIMES, BUT NOT DRASTICALLY IS SOMETIMES WE GET SOME HEAVY WINDS OR THE TREES ARE NOT MAINTAINED. RIGHT? SO A TREE BRANCH FALLS OFF. HITS A PEDESTRIAN RIGHT? WHO PAYS OKAY IF IT'S IN THE RIGHT AWAY. VERY IT'S THE CITY BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T MAINTAIN IT RIGHT IF IT'S ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. WHAT THEN IS A PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER GOING TO TAKE IT? YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN? IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU GUYS CAN THINK ABOUT. YOU KNOW THESE THINGS BECAUSE AT SOME POINT THEY'LL OCCUR. I THINK THAT'S. THE MAIN THING IS FOR YOU GUYS TO MAKE SURE THAT CLEAR IN WHAT WE'RE DOING. OKAY? AND, UH, OUTSIDE THAT. I THINK HE'S A GREAT PROGRAM. AS LONG AS THE PEOPLE DONATING EVERYTHING.
WE KEEP IT CLEAR SO THAT, UH, BORDER WITH THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS OR SUCH, DOESN'T HAVE TO KEEP MAKING RULINGS ON WHO'S RIGHT AND WRONG. CHAIR IF I MAY ANSWER MR MATHERS CONCERN ON THE FIRST QUESTION. UH THE IF THEY DEDICATE RIGHT AWAY. WE HAVE SET UP A SET UP A PROCESS WHERE THEY WOULD GO IN AS A MINOR DEVELOPMENT. SO IF THEY'RE DEDICATING, OR THEY GET ANY PARKING CREDITS THAT WOULD BE ESTABLISHED IN THE MINOR DEVELOPMENT. IN ANY CONDITIONS WITH AN ADMIRED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WILL BE RECORDED AND RUN WITH THE LAND SO THEY WOULD BE CODIFIED. BUT THEY CAN ACTUALLY SEE OKAY. DON'T LOSE THOSE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. ALL RIGHT, SO YOU'RE GONNA DO THAT ON THE ACTUAL AGREEMENT, RIGHT? RIGHT THAT'S SUNDAY AGREEMENT, AND THEN THEY WILL ACTUALLY APPLY FOR A MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN. MINOR DEVELOPMENT BUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN MOST CASES? SOMEBODY MAY JUST DO IT AND THEN NOT LOOKING TO CHANGE ANYTHING. TO ME, I THINK BACK LATER 234 YEARS LATER, THEY'RE SELLING IT AND THEY WANT TO MAKE A SOMEBODY WANTS TO MAKE A MINOR CHANGE OR SOMETHING. I'M JUST SAYING. IT MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD ACTUALLY MORE ALLIES. WHAT THEY'VE REQUESTED THAT YES, THAT WOULD HAPPEN. YES OKAY. YES EVERYBODY DONATES HAS TO DO THAT . YES RECORDED CORRECT WHAT THEY'RE GETTING INTO AT THE TIME , RIGHT? THAT IS CORRECT. NO DIFFERENT FROM WHEN WE WORKED ON OTHER PROJECTS THAT REQUIRED A THRESHOLD BETWEEN 50,000 AND THEN LESS THAN 50,000. NEGATIVE. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN ORDER. OKAY, AS LONG AS THERE'S SOMETHING THAT TELL THEM WHAT EACH EACH PROPERTY WILL BE UNIQUE AND HOW THEY MAINTAIN IT AND EVERYTHING AND THAT WILL BE CAPTURED WITHIN THAT DEVELOPMENT ORDER. OKAY, NO PROBLEM, AND I UNDERSTAND THE SIDEWALK TO HAVE TO DO ANY LIABILITY PERIOD OF PRIVATE PROPERTY, SO AND THEN THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF MAINTAINING THE TREES AND STUFF RIGHT, SO AND THAT'S COVERED IN THAT NEW ORDER THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SIGN. THAT'S THAT'S CORRECT RIGHT? BECAUSE THEY WOULD RUN WITH THE ACTUAL, UH, PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. PRIVATE PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT AS WELL. SO YOU GUYS GOT THAT COVERED UNDER THAT? YOU KNOW THAT. THAT'S GOOD. YES.
OUTSIDE THAT I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE WE'RE GONNA ARE WE GONNA USE OUR STORAGE OF LANDSCAPE FUNDS. FOR ANY OF THIS. FROM THE CRE FUNDS. I'VE ACTUALLY BUDGETED, UM FUNDING FOR THIS PROGRAM. IN THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR. OKAY SO THAT'S ALL THAT MONEY WE'VE BEEN GETTING FROM DEVELOPERS. OVER THE YEARS WE'VE GOT THAT WE WOULD COORDINATE WITH THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS, AND IF THEY'RE INTERESTED IN THE PROGRAM, THEY WOULD DEDICATE THEY WOULD GO THROUGH THE PROCESS THROUGH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT OF WAY TO CRE WOULD PROVIDE THE FUNDING TO DO THAT EXTENSION OF THE SIDEWALK AND UM, THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS OKAY, WOULD MAINTAIN ITS SINCERITY DEDICATING IT TO THE CITY. OKAY THAT'S GOOD. I LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING PREPARED FOR YEARS. WE'RE SPENDING SOME MONEY ON GREEN REFRESHMENT. SO I LIKE THE PLAN. AND. MY ONLY THING IS, I FEEL LIKE THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT THIS PROCESS HAS GONE ON, AND THEY MAY NOT BE AWARE OF IT. UNLESS YOU'RE REALLY UP TO DATE ON WHAT'S GOING ON CITY STEWART BUT LIKE BEFORE WE PRESENTED TO HIM. WE WANT THE COMMISSION TO APPROVE IT. NOW WE'RE GOING TO SAY HERE'S THE PLAN. WHEN YOU HAVE THESE STAKEHOLDERS WHO MAY HAVE SOME GREAT IDEAS ON MAYBE BETTER INCENTIVES OR UM. WAYS TO MAKE SURE WE DON'T HAVE TO PAY A MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE. UM AND I THINK IN THAT PROCESS IF YOU GET THESE PROPERTY OWNERS, YOU'RE GOING TO
[00:45:06]
GET CONSENSUS BECAUSE IT'S A GOOD OVERALL PLAN. I JUST I FEEL LIKE THAT SHOULD HAPPEN. MAYBE BETWEEN NOW AND THE COMMISSION. WELL AGAIN. WE WANTED TO, UM, BE SENSITIVE TO THAT WE DIDN'T GET PEOPLE EXCITED ABOUT AN IDEA AND A FUNDING SOURCE THAT WOULD EVAPORATE ON THEM TO, YOU KNOW, SO THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE TAXPAYERS THE CITY WHOSE REPRESENTATIVES ALSO FEEL ARE IS IT WORTHWHILE INVESTMENT TO YOUR POINT ABOUT THE ABBOT, THE MINOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE THAT IS ACTUALLY SOMETHING UM, STAFF IS NODDING AT ME BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE COVERING THE COST OF THAT AS PART OF THIS PROGRAM, TOO. SO AGAIN, WE REALLY WANT TO ENCOURAGE THAT INCENTIVE PROGRAM TO BE PART OF IT. I ALSO WOULD JUST NOTE THAT YOU KNOW AGAIN. THE PROGRAM IS ONE THING. AND THEN THE, UM THE L. D R S IS ANOTHER. AND SO THERE MAY BE OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH THAT OUTREACH THAT THE PROGRAM COULD BE AMENDED TO OVERTIME. IF THAT'S IF THAT'S A SOMETHING THAT WE HEAR A LOT ABOUT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON THIS? CAN WE MAKE A MOTION WITH CONTINGENTS? SURE YEAH, SURE. I AGREE WITH YOU THAT I THINK THERE SHOULD BE FEEDBACK FROM THE OWNERS, BUSINESS OWNERS AND ALIKE BEFORE THE COMMISSION. NOT HOSPITAL COMMISSIONERS APPROVING SO THAT SHOULD BE SOMETHING THAT HAPPENS BEFORE IT GOES BEFORE THE COMMISSIONERS. SO THEY HAVE ALL THAT INFORMATION. I WOULD AGREE. SO WE'RE LOOKING AT SAYING WE'RE FINE, BUT WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION HAVE PUBLIC HEARINGS OR SOMETHING BEFORE THEY VOTE THAT THERE. THERE ARE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND THE COMMISSIONERS ARE PROVIDED WITH THE DETAILS OF THAT THOSE MEETINGS WHETHER THEY BE ONE OR WAS THERE A PUBLIC NOTICE THAT WAS SENT REGARDING THIS? NO THAT WOULD BE WE WOULD SEND OUT DIRECT MAILERS AS PART OF THE END AS PART OF THE PROGRAM MAILERS GOING DOOR TO DOOR AT ADDRESSED LETTERS AND THEN A BIG PUBLIC WORKSHOP FOR ALL THIS. THE PROPERTY OWNERS. OKAY BECAUSE IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT LIKE THIS BOARD IS SAYING AS A YOU KNOW, COMMUNITY. WE THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA. BUT BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSIONERS REALLY OBLIGATE FUNDS, IT WOULD BE GOOD. I AGREE TO, LIKE, DO THE NOTIFICATION AND GET THE INPUT FROM THE BUSINESSES. THAT WHAT I'M HEARING? YES. OKAY, ABSOLUTELY. OKAY? THAT IN OPPORTUNITIES LIKE FORMALLY SAY SOMETHING FORMALLY, PLEASE. OKAY SO WE'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION WITH THE CONTINGENCY THAT PRIOR TO THIS GOING BEFORE THE COMMISSIONERS FOR A VOTE. THAT THERE WOULD BE, UM FEEDBACK AND DATA PROVIDED FROM PUBLIC MEETINGS TO THE HOMEOWNERS IN THE AREA AND THEIR RESPONSE TO THIS PUBLIC NOTICE. BE GIVEN NOTICE BEGINNING THANK YOU. SO, UM. FOR THE RIGHT, OKAY? COULD BE REACHED OUT TO GET COMMENTS FROM THE CITY COMMISSION ON THE 28TH AND THEN GET THEIR YOU KNOW, FEEDBACK AND SUPPORT BEFORE WE GO OUT TO THE PUBLIC WOULD BE BETWEEN THE 1ST AND 2ND READING. WE COULD PROVIDE THE COMMENTS. TO THE CITY COMMISSION WOULD BE PROVIDING THE COMMISSIONERS WITH MORE INFORMATION FOR THEM TO MAKE A DECISION. BECAUSE I THINK THAT WHAT OUR CONCERN IS THIS INVOLVES PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE RIGHTS SO WE DON'T WANT SOMETHING DECIDED IN A CODE TO BE CHANGED. WITHOUT THE INPUT OF THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS BECAUSE THEY HAVE RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY . I MEAN, THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE, SO WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE A DECISION. AND SAY WE ARE IN FAVOR OF A DECISION WITHOUT NECESSARY FEEDBACK AND INFORMATION FROM THE ACTUAL OWNERS WHO WOULD BE YOU KNOW, MHM IMPACT. WE'RE SAYING THAT BEFORE COMMISSION GIVES FINAL APPROVAL, RIGHT, RIGHT? YES SO I COULD GET FIRST READING IS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. IT'S JUST IT'S JUST GOING TO PRESENTATION THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE FOR THE COMMISSION. AND THE BOARD WILL BE OF RECORD TO SAY, OKAY, WE WOULD REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION NOT DO A FINAL UNTIL AFTER THE PUBLIC HAS GOTTEN THEIR INPUT AND THEY'VE DONE THEIR YOU KNOW THEIR STUFF. THEN YOU COULD GET FEEDBACK FROM THE CITY COMMISSIONERS TO SEE IF THIS IS EVEN SOMETHING THEY'RE IN FAVOR. EXACTLY EXACTLY TWO CENTS THEN. BEFORE THEY GO OUT. AND YOU KNOW, YEAH, I THINK THAT THAT'S A REASONABLE YES, WE NEED TO USE WORDS THAT MAKE YOUR MOST ALREADY MADE IT CLEAR TO MEND IT . MEND THEM, OKAY, CLARIFICATION WOULD BE BEFORE IT GOES TO THE SO ALL THE OKAY, MAKE A MOTION. FOR THIS PLAN TO BE APPROVED,[00:50:05]
BUT WITH THE CAVEAT THAT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO THE COMMISSIONERS, THEY CAN HAVE A FIRST READING AND LOOK AT IT AND THEN CERTAINLY WEIGH IN ON THAT SECOND MEETING WITH ALL OF THE INFORMATION FROM THE IMPACTED TAXPAYERS. I'LL SECOND IT. ANYBODY LIKE TO SECOND. YOU SOUND LIKE MY WIFE HEARS ME. WE CAN SAY THAT AGAIN. IF I MAY READ THE ORDINANCE RECORD, THANK YOU. ORDINANCE NUMBER 25 TO 0-20 TO THREE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA MENDING AND RESTATING THE CITY LIKE THE CITIES LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDED SECTION 2.04 0.06 ENTITLED SUPPLEMENTAL BUILDING SETBACKS ON CERTAIN STREETS. IN CHAPTER TWO AND SECTION 3.01 0.03 ENTITLED URBAN STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR DESIGNATED URBAN SUB DISTRICTS IN CHAPTER THREE AMENDING SECTION 11.01 0.03 ENTITLED MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION IN CHAPTER 11 AND CHAPTER 12 DEFINITIONS OF THE CITY OF STEWART LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND OTHER PURPOSES. NOW. WOULD YOU LIKE US TO TAKE THE ROLL CALL ON THIS MOTION? SO YOU JUST READ WHAT WAS HERE? THE TITLE THE TITLE THE RECORD JUST THEN WHAT WAS THE MOTION THAT CAN YOU READ US BACK? WHAT THE MOTION AFTER ALL OF THAT, WHAT OUR MOTION IS THAT WE'RE VOTING ON. OKAY UM, PRIOR TO ATTACH OPTION PRIOR TO ADOPTION GOING TO COMMISSIONERS FOR VOTE THERE BE FEEDBACK FROM PROPERTY OWNERS. FOR, UH, THE COMMISSION. I'M SORRY. HAVE A FIRST READING AND THEN WEIGHT IN ON THE SECOND MEETING. DOES THAT MAKE SO IT'LL GO BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND THEY'LL DISCUSS IT IN ANY CHANGES WOULD HAPPEN PRIOR TO ADOPTION AT SECOND READING. YEAH WHAT THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE INCORRECT PUBLIC PUBLIC INPUT BEFORE THE ACTION ADOPTION. OKAY OKAY. AND, UM, PUBLIC COMMENT. ON THE MOTION. IF YOU COULD COME TO THE MICROPHONE, SIR, YOU HAVE TO OFFICIALLY STATE YOUR NAME. THANK YOU. SEAN FORBES. UM HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT DOING A SURVEY TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO SEE IF WE WERE TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS? WOULD YOU BE IN FAVOR OF IT? BECAUSE I AGREE WITH LIKE, IF YOU HAVE A PIECEMEAL, IT'S NOT GONNA LIVE. MHM. GOOD. GOOD LUCK. THANK YOU. UM THE. WE'RE GONNA MOVE UP BASED OFF OF THE, UM THE DIRECTION GIVEN FROM THE FDA TO MOVE UP SOME OF THAT SURVEYING AND OUTREACH WITH THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS. UM WE DID A LOT OF OUTREACH AS PART OF THAT MASTER PLAN STUDY FOR THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY MASTER PLAN, AND SO WE TALKED TO SOME OF THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THAT PROCESS , AND WE ALSO DID AN EXTENSIVE SURVEY OF THE PUBLIC AND WHAT THEY THOUGHT SHOULD CHANGE OR WHAT WOULD BE IMPROVED THIS AREA, BUT UM AND YOU KNOW A LOT OF THESE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS. YOU KNOW, THEY THEY'RE THEY'RE NOT LOCAL. SO IT'S A REAL PUSH TO GET THEM, SO WE TALKED TO A LOT OF THEIR REPRESENTATIVES IN THEIR PROCESS . OF COURSE WE'LL YOU KNOW, WE'LL JUST MOVE THAT UP THE TIMELINE NOW WITH THE 14 FT. CAN I ASK YOU A QUICK QUESTION? THE DOCUMENTS. I HAVE THEY CALL IT.25 20. CORRECT MHM. OKAY? YOU GOT 25 03 ON THE SCREEN. I HOPE I'M RIGHT NOW. THERE WAS A TYPO , TYPO! I THINK. YEAH. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT. NOW WE JUST NEED A SECOND MOTION. WE ALREADY HAVE A SECOND. OKAY MATTERS. CHAIR. LAURIE YES. VICE CHAIR. BROWNFIELD YES. BOARD MEMBER QUASARS. OH, I'M SORRY. ABSOLUTELY. BOARD MEMBER. JOBY. YES. BOARD MEMBER MATHERS. YES, STRONG? YES. ALRIGHT WONDERFUL. DO WE HAVE ANY STAFF UPDATES TONIGHT? UM, NOT AT THIS TIME, OKAY? NO OTHER BUSINESS. WE ARE OFFICIALLY ADJOURNED. THANK YOUU
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.