Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:01]

OH SUPPOSED TO BE ON THAT ABOUT THAT? WHAT HAPPENED WITH THIS? ISN'T IT TERRIBLE? GOOD EVENING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. GOOD EVENING. THIS MEETING STARTED. MARY ROCO. MAYOR BRUNER. YES.

[ROLL CALL]

HERE RICH HERE, COMMISSIONER CLARK HERE. COLLINS MCDONALD'S HERE. DO YOU HAVE ABOUT OUR PASTOR HERE? YES, WE DO. WE DO. WE'LL HAVE AN INDICATION WITH EVERYONE STANDING. THANK YOU, SIR. PLEASURE. FATHER WHO INHABITS HEAVEN AND THE WHOLE UNIVERSE. WE COME BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. AND WE THANK YOU, GOD FOR THE OPPORTUNITY THAT WE HAVE TO GATHER TOGETHER. UH TO CONDUCT THE BUSINESS OF THIS CITY. THE DECISIONS TO BE MADE AND THE DIRECTIONS TO BE TAKEN.

LORD WE THANK YOU THAT YOU HAVE PROMISED US WISDOM AND DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE AND LORD, I WOULD ASK THAT TONIGHT. FOR THESE THAT YOU'VE PLACED IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY OVER US. YOUR WORD TELLS US THAT WE'RE TO PRAY FOR THOSE IN AUTHORITY. AND LORD. MANY OF US DO JUST THAT ON A REGULAR BASIS, NOT JUST ONCE A MONTH AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING, BUT WE PRAY REGULARLY.

FOR THEM FOR THEIR HELP FOR THEIR WELFARE FOR THEIR FAMILIES. LORD THAT YOU WOULD BESTOW BLESSINGS UPON THEM AND GRANT THEM THE WISDOM AND THE DIRECTION AND THE GUIDANCE THAT THEY NEED. TO DO THE WORK THAT YOU CALLED THEM TO DO IN THIS COMMUNITY. WE LOOK TO THEM.

ORDERS. THEY LEAD US. THANK YOU GOD TONIGHT FOR THIS CITY AND I PRAY THIS EVENING, NOT JUST FOR THIS MEETING. BUT I'VE BEEN REFLECTING THIS WEEK OR LAST WEEK AND OVER THE WEEKEND ABOUT HOW TO PRAY. AND LORD, I WANT TO LIFT UP ALL WHO WORK FOR THE CITY OF STEWART. FROM THE OFFICES HERE TO THE MEN ON THE STREETS TO EACH ONE, ESPECIALLY THE POLICE OFFICERS, THE FIRST RESPONDERS. LORD THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. EVERYONE GOD, WHO PUTS THEIR LIFE ON THE LINE WHO SERVED US AND SERVE YOU BY SERVING US. AND SO GOD, I THANK YOU FOR THE PRIVILEGE THAT I HAVE TONIGHT TO STAND HERE AND PRAY AND BELIEVE THAT YOU HEAR AND THAT NOT ONLY DO YOU HEAR YOU ANSWER PRAYER, AND I GIVE YOU PRAISE FOR IT. I PRAY IN THE NAME OF JESUS AND WE JUST GIVE YOU ALL THE THANKS AND THE HONOR IN HIS NAME. AMEN THANK YOU, SIR . I WILL DO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD. MM HMM. DO I HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM ANY OF OUR COMMISSIONERS? IS THAT IT ON THE

[COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONERS ]

AGENDA? OH THANK YOU, MCDONALD. YEAH, SO ANYWAY, SO, UH WELCOME. EVERYBODY HAD WENT UP TO TALLAHASSEE LAST WEEK, AND I'LL SAY THIS ABOUT TALLAHASSEE COMPARED TO LAST YEAR VERSUS THIS YEAR. THERE WAS DEFINITELY A DIFFERENT, UH BOOT. I WOULD SAY IT WAS MORE MODERATED. AH, AND I DIDN'T FEEL THAT WE WERE GETTING AS RUN OVER IF WE HAD UM . FIND OUT A FEW. THERE ARE A FEW THINGS OUT THERE THAT ARE INTERESTING FOR SOME LEGISLATION . UM AND I'VE BEEN SPEAKING WITH MR MARTEL ABOUT THE ONE OF THEM. COUPLE OF THEM ACTUALLY ARE INVOLVED ARE UTILITIES. THERE'S ONE BILL HOUSE. BILL 665 IS REGARDING SERVICE CHARGES THAT WE CHARGED THE FEES THAT WE CHARGE ARE NON RESIDENTS THAT USE OUR UTILITIES. UM FOR US. IT'S PROBABLY NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL, BUT THERE ARE, MUNICIPALITY SAID. IT IS A BIG DEAL AND THAT'S IF YOU DON'T IF YOU'RE IF YOU'RE A CITY. YOU TOLD THE USER AND YOU DON'T LIVE IN THE MISSILE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY. YOU PAY A DIFFERENT RATE FOR OUR UTILITIES, AND IT'S A PRETTY COMMON PRACTICE. I THINK WE HAVE A COUPLE OF AREAS THAT PAY THAT ARE NOT IN THE CITY THAT GIVEN THEY PAY ABOUT, UH 10% SURCHARGE. UM SO WE ALSO THERE'S A BILL WHEN I THINK WE SHOULD KEEP AN EYE ON, UM IS RECLAIMED WATER AND NUTRIENT LOAD RECORDING OUR OUR RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM. UM SO THEY'RE LOOKING AT REGULATING HOW MUCH NUTRIENTS ARE IN THE, UH, WATER BEING DISCHARGED FROM OUR RECLAIMED WATER BEING USED FOR IRRIGATION BECAUSE THERE ARE NUTRIENTS IN THERE, SO THAT'S JUST SOMETHING WE MAY NEED TO BE LOOKING AT. HOW DEPENDING ON WHAT THOSE NUTRIENT LOADS R LA R , IF WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO REDUCE THOSE NUTRIENT LOADS AND OUR IRRIGATION QUALITY WATER

[00:05:05]

THERE WAS ALSO SOME DISCUSSIONS REGARDING SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSIONS AND MAYBE REQUIRING INSPECTIONS EVERY 3 TO 5 YEARS FOR HOMEOWNERS THAT HAVE SEPTIC SYSTEMS AND AT THAT 3 TO 5 YEAR PERIOD, DEPENDING ON THE CONDITION OF THE SEPTIC SYSTEM, REQUIRING THEM TO HOOK UP TO SEWER IF AVAILABLE. OR PUT IT OR OF DOING UPGRADE TO THEIR SEPTIC SYSTEMS. UM SO I'M NOT SURE WHERE THAT BILL IS GOING TO GO. IF THAT'S GONNA GO ANYWHERE, BUT THAT'S THERE IS SOME. THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. THERE'S ALSO A BILL IF WE HAVE AN AGENDA NUMBER FIVE WHILE GOING TO THAT MORE ABOUT SOME CLAWING BACK SOME OF THE PREEMPTIONS INCENTIVE, BILL 102. OH, I THINK THAT I HAD I THINK THAT I HAD GOOD DISCUSSIONS WITH OUR MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE SENATOR HERO AND REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER REGARDING OUR APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST. SO WE'LL SEE. I THINK IT WILL DEPEND ON HOW THE REVENUE COMES IN THE REVENUE FORECAST. UM BUT IF THEY SAY IT HAS A GOOD STRONG REVENUE FORECAST, I THINK THAT WILL LIKELY TO GET AN APPROPRIATION.

IF IT'S NOT AS GOOD. WHO KNOWS. SO UM, BUT LIKE I SAID, I DID FEEL BETTER ABOUT TALLAHASSEE THIS YEAR THAN I DID LAST YEAR FIRST. AH, THEM WORKING WITH US SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

COMMISSIONER. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT. COMMISSIONER RICH DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT? UM. YES THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. I ALSO WENT TO TALLAHASSEE AND, UH, I AGREE. THE MOOD WAS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LAST YEAR. OUR GOVERNOR WAS EVERYBODY ASSUMED HE WAS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT, AND THAT CREATED THE UNIQUE ATMOSPHERE. UM I WENT UP AS A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE TREASURE COAST REGION, FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES AND I SIT ON THE UTILITIES AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE. WHICH IS VERY SENSIBLE SINCE WATER IS SO IMPORTANT TO US. IN STUART. OUR PRIMARY FOCUS IS TRYING TO UPDATE THE STORM WATER REGULATION BILL NEEDS TO BE RATIFIED. THE CURRENT RULES GOVERNING STORMWATER REGULATION ARE 20 YEARS OLD, AND MOST OF THE DATA IS ALSO VERY, VERY OLD. AND IT'S JUST NOT WORKING AS YOU ARE ALL AWARE ABOUT EVERY WEEK.

NOW WE'LL HEAR ABOUT SOME REMARKABLE PRECIPITATION EVENT 20 INCHES AND 12 HOURS AND I CAN TELL YOU WHO'S PAYING ATTENTION TO THOSE IS THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY WHO USES THE LATEST DATED AND THE UPDATED MODELING. AND SO, UH, WE FEEL IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THE INDUSTRY VIEW US AS DOING THE BEST JOB WE CAN TO PROTECT ALL OF OUR RESOURCES. AND SO WE'RE. WERE I WAS CONFIDENT AND IT'S OKAY. I HAVE SOME DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE THAT THIS CAN TAKE PLACE. THE OTHER THING IS, UM A GOAL OF TALLAHASSEE HAS BEEN TO REDUCE THE POWER OF MUNICIPALITIES.

THEY WANT TO HAVE ALL THE MAKE ALL THE DECISIONS UP IN TALLAHASSEE, AND THERE'S EXPLICIT WAYS THEY CAN DO THAT. WITH RULES AND. BUT THERE'S ANOTHER WAY THEY ANOTHER WAY THEY CAN DO THAT IS BY DE FUNDING US. AND THEY WANT TO PUT THREE AMENDMENTS ON THE BALLOT.

WHICH WOULD ALLOW YOU TO VOTE TO DECREASE YOUR TAXES, WHICH IS VERY APPEALING. OBVIOUSLY. BUT ONE IS THEY WANT TO INCREASE THE MILITARY RAIDS OR ADD ANOTHER $25,000 OF EXEMPTION. TO HOME VALUES. JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA IN THE CITY OF STEWART. 64% OF THE REAL PROPERTY PARCELS. PAY LESS THAN I PAY $100 OR LESS OR YEAR. SO TWO THIRDS OF THE REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF STEWART PAYS $100 OR LESS A YEAR. AH! SO WE'RE OPPOSED TO THAT. AND THE OTHER ONE IS I'M JUST GONNA MENTION TO THE OTHER ONE IS THEY WANT TO, UH RESTRICTING US RESTRICT US FROM CHARGING A FOR YOUR BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL, WHICH IS A VERY MODEST FEE. AH BUT IT ACTUALLY REPRESENTS CONSIDERABLE REVENUE FOR THE CITY OF STEWART AND THE OTHER THING IT DOES. IT ALLOWS US TO MAKE SURE THAT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, THOSE BUSINESSES ARE IN COMPLIANCE. THAT THEY'RE OPERATING THAT THEY'RE ADHERING TO THE CODE REQUIREMENTS AND SO AND FUNCTIONS AND VERY MANY EFFECTIVE WAYS. AND WE ARE ALSO OBVIOUSLY OPPOSED TO THAT SO STAY TUNED. HOW MUCH TIME LEFT

[00:10:01]

AND MARCH AND MARCH OR FEBRUARY? FEBRUARY. I'M SORRY. UM IT'S A VERY BUSY SESSION AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN PROVIDE UPDATES. THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THANK YOU. BOTH COMMISSIONERS WERE GOING TO TALLAHASSEE. IT'S IMPORTANT FOR OUR CONSTITUENTS. TO COME BACK AND TELL US WHAT'S GOING ON.

SURE. YES. GOOD EVENING. IN THE WORDS OF MARJORIE STONEMAN. DOUGLAS BEING NUISANCE WHEN IT COUNTS. DO YOUR PART TO INFORM AND STIMULATE THE PUBLIC TO JOIN YOUR ACTION. BE DEPRESSED.

DISCOURAGED AND DISAPPOINTED IT FAILURE. AND THE DISHEARTENING EFFECTS OF IGNORANCE, GREED.

CORRUPTION AND BAD POLITICS, BUT NEVER GIVE UP. HISTORY DOES NOT REMEMBER THOSE WHO, GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE LEADERS AND REFORMERS FOLLOWED THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE. HISTORY DOES REMEMBER THOSE WHO FOUGHT FOR WHAT WAS GOOD. WENT AGAINST THE GRAIN, NO MATTER HOW THEY WERE CHARACTERIZED AT THE TIME. PEOPLE LIKE MAGGIE HER CHALLAH. WHO OVERCAME THE SEDUCTION OF GOING ALONG TO GET ALONG. SHE DIDN'T CARE ABOUT WHAT DEVELOPERS THOUGHT ABOUT HER OR WHAT THEIR APOLOGISTS WROTE EITHER. AT THE TIME, SHE WAS DISPARAGED BY MANY BUT ASK ALMOST ANY RESIDENT TODAY AND THEY'LL TELL YOU THAT SURE WISH MAGGIE WAS BACK. MAGGIE WAS SPECIAL BECAUSE HER IDENTITY WAS NOT DEFINED BY HER SEAT OR TITLE. SHE DEFINED HER SEAT. AND USED IT TO SERVE ALL OF US, NOT HERSELF. WE LIVE WHERE WE DO BECAUSE OF THAT KIND OF LEADERSHIP. THAT IS THE KIND OF LEADERS WE SHOULD WANT TO BE. BECAUSE CONTRARY TO HOW IMPORTANT WE MAY FEEL AT COCKTAIL PARTIES ARE POSITIONS DO NOT MATTER. EXCEPT THAT WE SHOULD BE JUDGED MORE HARSHLY IF WE HELD THEM AND DID NOT DO AS MUCH GOOD AS WE COULD. WITH THE TIME WE HAD AS THE SCRIPTURE SAYS, TO WHOM MUCH IS GIVEN MUCH WILL BE REQUIRED. IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO SERVE RESIDENTS. REDEMPTION IS THE BEST PART OF ANY STORY. IF YOU WILL REPRESENT RESIDENTS AND THEIR INTERESTS AT THESE MEETINGS. IF YOU WILL SPEAK THEIR WORDS FROM THIS DIESS. THEY WILL EMBRACE YOU. NOT WITH FORCED SMILES AND HANDSHAKES FOR PROPERLY TOEING THE LINE. BUT WITH ENDLESS THANK YOU BIG HUGS AND THE KIND OF SATISFACTION YOU WILL ONLY FIND BY DOING THE RIGHT THING. ESPECIALLY WHEN IT'S HARD. SO TONIGHT TO ALL THE RESIDENTS AFTER LAST MEETING. I WANT TO SAY PLEASE NEVER GIVE UP. AND THANK YOU FOR SHOWING UP AND SPEAKING OF INTERESTING. THE CARD. CAN YOU HEAR ME? THANK YOU. UM MADAM MAYOR, I WANT TO PULL ITEM NUMBER FOUR. JUST HAVE THE. EITHER CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY ATTORNEY JUST PROVIDE US WITH THAT DISTINCTION OF EXACTLY WHAT STAGE OF THE PROCESS. WE ARE STATED IN THE THAT PROPOSED RESOLUTION JUST FOR THE PUBLIC BECAUSE IT'S ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR, SO OKAY, JUST WANTED TO PULL IT FOR THAT, THEN THE OTHER THING IS THAT I WANTED TO THANK THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE ANNUAL MLK. VINCE AT EVENTS WENT WELL AND I WANTED TO THANK THE CITY FOR PARTICIPATING. UM BOTH IN THEIR SUPPORT. UM IN FINANCING ORGANIZATION AND HELPING AND PARTICIPATING ON THAT DAY, AND WE JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT. WE HAVE HB 102 AND 328. UH, IN A WAY ON THE AGENDA FOR ITEM NUMBER FIVE, AND I KNOW THAT I HAVE RECEIVED LETTERS AFTER WE'VE HAD THE LAST MEETING AND VOTED ON THE PROJECT ON COLORADO. PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ASKING ABOUT YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON DOWNTOWN? WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO, OR WE GO IN HEADLONG INTO SOMETHING? ARE WE JUST GOING CRAZY, AND PEOPLE MAYBE HAVE FORGOTTEN. OR MAYBE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT IS IN OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR WHAT'S IN OUR DOWNTOWN PLAN. WHAT'S IN OUR HISTORIC AREA PLAN AND OUR TRAFFIC MOBILITY PLAN IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, SO I WE JUST HAD A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING RIGHT BEFORE THIS MEETING. AND I ASKED, UM. IF THERE'S SOMEHOW THAT WE COULD DO SOME KIND OF OPEN HOUSE OR WORKSHOP OR SOMETHING, I DON'T THINK WE'RE DUE FOR ANY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. BUT I DID TALK TO. I DIDN'T TALK TO HER CITY ATTORNEY, BUT I TALKED TO HER PLANNING DIRECTOR AND ASKED ABOUT THESE, UM, HOUSE,

[00:15:03]

BUILD THE LIVE LOCAL ACT AND HOW THEY ARE BEING INCORPORATED INTO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND I WAS TOLD THAT THEY'RE NOT ACTUALLY INCORPORATED. WE'RE FOLLOWING THEM FROM THE STATE STATUTES PERSPECTIVE. BUT EVEN SO, THESE BILLS PROBABLY HAVEN'T EVEN GONE INTO CHAPTER 163 AND OTHER THINGS. SO JUST I THINK JUST AND EVEN TO JUST HIGHLIGHT, AND I THINK WE'LL BE ABLE TO DO A LITTLE BIT TONIGHT WITH BECAUSE THERE'S A SHORT, UM, I DIDN'T WANT HERE JUST TO APPRAISE THE PRICES OF WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH 328. BUT I THINK PEOPLE PROBABLY NEED TO UM. LET HER GET BACK TO THEIR ROOTS, I GUESS GET TO UNDERSTAND, AND I KNOW THAT WE ANNOUNCED THESE MEETINGS AND WE DO HAVE WORKSHOPS THAT WE DO HAVE MEETINGS WHERE PEOPLE CAN COME OUT AND LEARN WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE SCIARRA AREA. THEY CAN LEARN WHAT THE CODES ARE. LEARN WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH PARKING, BUT, UM, I DON'T KNOW. MADAM MAYOR WAS JUST ASKING IF THERE'S A WAY FOR CITY MANAGER TO EITHER WORK WITH STAFF TO TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN GET THE WORD OUT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. OR IF WE NEED TO DO A WORKSHOP. UM AND THEN I WANT TO FIND OUT IF THE ATTORNEY. IF ANY OTHER CITIES OR COMMUNITIES OR ANYBODY ELSE HAS DONE ANYTHING WITH THESE HOUSE BILLS THAT WERE WORKING TO COMPLY WITH IF THEY HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN INCORPORATED IN ANYBODY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR INTO THAT, UM, CHAPTER 163. AND I KNOW THAT I HAD AN ANSWER FOR MORE PLANNING DIRECTOR, BUT I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT UP ON THE DIET SO THAT WE ARE ALL KIND OF LIKE ON THE SAME PAGE.

COMMISSIONER CARTER, I CAN TELL YOU THAT, UM, WHAT'S KNOWN AS SENATE BILL? 102 FROM LAST YEAR WAS ACTUALLY UM CODIFIED. AS FLORIDA STATUTE 1 66.4. 151. AND THEREFORE IT HAS BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE STATE STATUTES. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE AMENDED 328 ACTUALLY HAS LANGUAGE IN IT. THAT SPECIFICALLY SAYS THE, UH. APPROVED PROJECTS UNDER SENATE BILL 102. THAT WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF OUR COM PLAN. WILL BE ALLOWED TO REMAIN AFTER THE 30 YEARS THAT THEY'RE ENTITLED TO BE THERE. SO THE BIG ISSUE FROM LAST YEAR WAS WHAT HAPPENS AT THE END OF 30 YEARS BECAUSE THEY HAD TO COLLECT THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING RENT FOR 30 YEARS, BUT NOBODY SAID WHAT HAPPENED IN YEAR 31. AND THE INTENTION IS THAT THERE WILL BE CONSIDERED NONCONFORMING USES, AND THEY WILL NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPLAINT BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPLAINT NOW. BUT I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT UP IN THE PUBLIC, SO WE'RE ALL AWARE OF SOME OF THE NUANCES THAT WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH. OKAY?

[COMMENTS BY CITY MANAGER ]

THANK YOU. WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM OUR MANAGER? I HAD A COUPLE OF COMMENTS. FIRST IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HOSTED A STATEWIDE TAEKWONDO. MEETING ON SATURDAY.

JUJITSU YOU WOULD NEVER CALL YOU'RE LOOKING FOR A BEATING. READ IT FROM MY PHONE. I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU ACTUALLY PARTICIPATED IN IT. HMM BUT IT WAS AN HONOR BECAUSE PARTICIPANTS CAME FROM ALL OVER THE STATE, AND I THINK IT WAS ALL DAY. SATURDAY WAS IT SUNDAY AS WELL. IN ADDITION TO THAT, OUR FINANCE DEPARTMENT AS AGAIN RECEIVED THE DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD, AND I KNOW THAT THEY RECEIVED IT LAST YEAR AND THE YEAR BEFORE AS WELL AND I'VE ASKED THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO COME. TO OUR FEBRUARY MEETING THE FIRST MEETING IN FEBRUARY. WE HAVE PRESENTATIONS AND I'M GONNA HAVE HIM. DO A PRESENTATION OF OUR ONLINE BUDGET AND HOW THE TRANSPARENCY OF IT AND HOW YOU CAN ASK QUESTIONS AND CLICK AROUND AND SEE WHAT'S THERE AND BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE INFORMATION AND LOOK AT AND SHOW YOU GUYS AND ANYBODY ELSE THAT WANTS TO COME. BUT THAT WILL COME TO FOLLOW NEXT MEETING.

[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]

THAT'S ALL. I GOT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. SECOND. UM PULLED IN. ITEM NUMBER FOUR, SIR. PULLING ITEM NUMBER FOUR. THANK YOU, SIR. JUST FOUR, OKAY? FIVE WOULD ALREADY BE DISCUSSION IDEA.

YEAH, YES, ALL RIGHT. COMMENTS YEAH, EVERYBODY. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC HAVE THE VOTE. OH SORRY ON THE AGENDA. EXCUSE ME, MAN. DID YOU DO A ROLL CALL? SURE MAYOR BRUNER. YES,

[00:20:03]

COMMISSIONER CLARK? YES COLLINS MAYOR RICH COMMISSIONER MCDONALD. OKAY? CLARK. FOR NO,

[COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (Non-Agenda Related) (3 Minutes Max.) ]

IT'S COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC NOW. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? YEAH. WE HAVE ONE PARENT. YES BUT THIS IS FOR JUST PUBLIC COMMENT, NOT FOR ANY OF THE. YES SIR. MISS RUG. COULD YOU COME FORWARD, PLEASE? AND JUST GOAL, THOUGH AHEAD. BETTER THAN ME. TOM THANK YOU, MR CARON HOLLIOAKE'S DREDGE 17 ON ONE SOUTH WEST PALM CITY ROAD, SO GRATEFUL TO BEAT AMERICANS SO GRATEFUL TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK AND ADDRESS MY GRIEVANCES TO MY GOVERNMENT. THE MEETING. LAST MEETING WE HAD IN OUR MAYOR WAS GOING TO CALL IN THE LAW ON ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS HOW FAR WE HAVE FALLEN. ALRIGHT THIS COMMISSION SUIT US IN 2014 AND RAISED THEIR OWN SALARIES IN 2017. THEY UH, A COUPLE OF THEM. I GUESS WE HAVE TO AS A WHOLE, BUT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MCDONALD'S AND CLARK SET UP SO THAT THE DECISIONS COULD BE MADE FOR THE OVERDEVELOPMENT. WE TALK ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEGREE ANYBODY PERSONALLY. TAKE THAT TIME OFF. MINE TALKED ABOUT AFFORDABLE. PLEASE DON'T INTERRUPT ME. MAYOR CORRECT. THIS IS WHAT YOU DID TO COMMISSIONER COLLINS. YOU DON'T CONTINUE, MISS RAJ. THANK YOU. I'M ASKING YOU NOT TO THREATEN A FELLOW COMMISSIONER WITH A POLICE ACTION. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS? THIS IS WRONG, OKAY? YOU HAVE. SO I'M NOT CALLING ANYBODY NAMES I AM SAYING IF WE WANT TO CLAP, CLAP, OKAY. IF WE WANNA THERE'S NO CIVILITY WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO CALL THE LAW ON A FELLOW COMMISSIONER AND THANK YOU FOR OUR CITY OF STEWART, OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND MORTON COUNTY. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? THIS HAS GONE TOO FAR. THIS IS NOT HOW WE TREAT ONE ANOTHER AND ALSO, YOU KNOW, NOW WE GOT TWO PEOPLE THAT IGNORE ME. AND SO I'M JUST GOING TO GIVE THIS TO YOU, MAYOR BECAUSE YOUR THERE'S A PENDING CASE YOU CAN SEE ON HERE. IT WAS FILED 118 IN THE FEDERAL COURT. YOU GUYS ARE HAVE A CASE YOU'RE LETTING MIKE BE THE ATTORNEY, WHICH IS UNBELIEVABLE. AND NOW WE HAVE MR BAGGETT IGNORING ME. SO NOW I GOTTA DO A REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AND ALL WE HAD TO DO WAS JUST ANSWER THE EMAIL. OKAY SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. BUT I KNOW THAT THINGS ARE GOING UP ANYTHING BUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS GOING UP. THANK YOU. MR HONEST. GREETINGS, SMALL TOWN STUART LITTLE BIT. SMALL TOWN STEWART COMMISSIONERS. I WASN'T HERE AT THE PREVIOUS HEARING.

WHEN YOU HEARD THE CREEK SIDE HOTEL, I WAS OUT OF TOWN. I WOULD HAVE BEEN HERE. ALRIGHT SENT YOU AN EMAIL. YOU PROBABLY NEVER SAW LOOKED AT IT. AND I WANT TO THANK YOU. PRESIDENT OF BRINGING UP TWO WONDERFUL PEOPLE WROTE. I KNEW PERSONALLY. THREE. STONEMAN DOUGLAS OUTSTANDING WOMAN. OUR ORGANIZATION IS STILL GOING STRONG HERE IN STUART LOVED BY E SAMPLES. OR MAYBE HIS SOLEMN SHE DIED A BROKEN WOMAN. SHE DIDN'T NEED TO. BUT SHE DID. PLEASE VOTE FOR SMALL TOWN, STEWART. PLEASE VOTE NO. ON CREEK SIDE HOTEL. THIS IS THE EMAIL I SENT YOU. WE YOUR CONSTITUENTS, VOTERS PLEAD WITH YOU. TO PROTECT OUR QUALITY OF LIFE IN OUR SMALL TOWN, STEWART.

AS YOU WELL KNOW, WE HAVE PLEADED WITH YOU BEFORE WE SIT DAILY INSTALLED TRAFFIC ON CANADA. AND US ONE. WE SHIPPED THROUGH NUMEROUS TRAFFIC LIGHTS, LIGHTS CHANGING, AND WE STILL SIT THERE AND GO GREEN, RED GREEN, RED GREEN RED. CAN TO MONTEREY. CARE OF US ONE AND INDIAN, CANADA AND MOST INTERSECTIONS ON US ONE. HE'S ROADS ARE OVER CAPACITY NOW.

MANY OF THE FOURTH STORY TENEMENTS YOU HAVE ALREADY APPROVED. I EVEN OCCUPIED YET,

[00:25:05]

INCLUDING COSTCO, 400 UNITS AND OTHER ELEMENTS THAT YOU HAVE APPROVED. AND WE'RE IN THIS TRAFFIC SITUATION TODAY. YOUR CONSTITUENTS. VOTERS ARE OUTRAGED. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU PEOPLE EVER GO OUT AND TALK TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS, BUT I DO I LISTEN TO HIM. I INTERACT WITH THEM. THEY ARE OUTRAGED. WHAT'S HAPPENING TO SMALL TOWN STEWART AND THEY'RE ALL RACE THAT THEY SIT. IN TRAFFIC, STALLED TRAFFIC SITTING AT LIGHTS. I ASKED COMMISSIONER MCDONALD'S. I SAID COME STAIRWAY WITH YOU IN THAT LITTLE MEDIUM IN US ONE AND I'M GONNA SIGN THERE. COMMISSIONER.

MCDONALD SAYS IT'S 70% CAPACITY LEFT ON CANADA. AND HE CAN TALK TO THE PEOPLE SITTING THERE OUTRAGED THROUGH LIGHTS. YOU MUST VOTE. NO. ON CREEKSIDE MOTEL. THAT IS NOT SMALL TOWN, STEWART. AND THE CURRENT DEPLORABLE TRAFFIC SITUATION THAT THEY NOW AND KENNETH DAILY.

COMMISSIONERS. I WAS SO OUTRAGED WHEN I SAW HOW YOU VOTED. I COULDN'T BELIEVE YOU VOTED FOR A MONSTROSITY IN THAT AREA WITH NO PARKING I'M NOT GONNA STAY AT THE HOTEL WHERE I GOT TO WALK TO THE PARKING GARAGE, AND CARA TOLD YOU FROM FRUITS AND ROOTS. THERE'S NO ROOM THERE ANYWAY.

AND I WENT TO CARRY TODAY TO APOLOGIZE FOR THE VOTE YOU DID ON HER. BECAUSE I EAT THERE NUMEROUS TIMES A WEEK. AREN'T YOUR TIME'S UP, SIR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES. MISSIONARY. WITH YOUR PARENTS. HE WENT DO YOU HAVE TALKED ABOUT

[CONSENT CALENDAR]

THE POOL? WHEN YOU PULL THAT IN FOURTH, A IMPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR CONSENTED AND TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. I DON'T WANT TO THREE THANK YOU. SECOND MOTION AND A SECOND. WE HAVE A ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE FOR MY NERVOUSNESS. DO WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? I SEE NONE. COMMISSIONER MACDONALD VICE MAYOR RICH YES. BRUNER

[4. AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AN ACCESS AGREEMENT WITH ASHLEY CAPITAL FOR THE OLD CITY LANDFILL (RC): RESOLUTION No. 13-2024; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO EXECUTE THE BROWNFIELDS SITE ACCESS AGREEMENT WITH TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

COMMISSIONER CLARK. YES, COLLINS. MADAM MAYOR. I DIDN'T NUMBER FOUR IS, UM THE AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE. THE ACCESS AGREEMENT WITH RUSSIA CAPITAL FOR THE OLD CITY LANDFILL RESOLUTION NUMBER 13-20 24. AND BEFORE I MOVE, UM, TO ASK THE COMMISSION TO APPROVE THIS RESOLUTION. I JUST WANTED THIS CITY ATTORNEY TO READ THAT TITLE IN FULL AND THEN TO GIVE US EITHER THE CITY ATTORNEY OR THE CITY MANAGER TO GIVE US A BRIEF HISTORY OF WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE LANDFILL AND THE STAGE. WE ARE WITH THE THEY, THE LESS SORE UM GET OR THE POTENTIAL LIST OR GETTING THIS, UH, ORGANIZATION TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY. MAYBE TO READ IT OUT. ANSWER. THANK YOU, MIKE. RESOLUTION NUMBER 13-20 TO 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO EXECUTE THE BROWNFIELDS SITE ACCESS AGREEMENT WITH TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. UM SO IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSIONER CLARK'S REQUEST. HISTORICALLY WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE LANDFILL. IS THAT, UM. IT WAS ORIGINALLY OPERATED AS A LANDFILL HERE LOCALLY. AND ULTIMATELY WAS STOPPED BEING USED. THE CITY HAS CONTINUED TO USE IT FOR STORAGE OF TREE AND OTHER DEBRIS BEFORE IT GETS TAKEN TO THE OKEECHOBEE LANDFILL. BUT, UM SEVERAL YEARS AGO, THE CITY WAS APPROACHED BY AN ENTITY OUT OF MIAMI INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN BROWNFIELD CLEANUP OF THE LANDFILL AND PURCHASING IT FROM THE CITY IN ORDER TO RESTORE THE PROPERTY. UM THEY WERE GRANTED A 270 DAY DUE DILIGENCE PERIOD DURING WHICH THEY COULD DO THERE. UM TESTING AND TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS FEASIBLE FOR THEIR INTENDED END USE. I THINK WE EXTENDED THAT BY 90 DAYS AND THEN ROUGHLY A YEAR LATER. WHEN THE TIME WAS UP, THEY HAD TO EITHER MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL DEPOSIT ON THE PROPERTY TO SECURE MOVING FORWARD OR NOTIFY US OF TERMINATION. AND THEY ELECTED TO NOT MAKE THE DEPOSIT.

[00:30:03]

IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THAT, PROBABLY WITHIN THREE WEEKS. WE RECEIVED AN UNSOLICITED LETTER.

FROM THE ASHLEY CAPITAL ENTITY. ASKING IF WE WOULD BE INTERESTED INTO ENTERING INTO DISCUSSION TO SELL THE LANDFILL TO THEM AT FAIR MARKET VALUE AFTER THEY'VE DONE AN EVALUATION AND DETERMINE IF IT WAS FEASIBLE FOR A BROWNFIELD EVALUATION. I BROUGHT IT BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND THE COMMISSION VOTED AND PASSED A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ASHLEY CAPITAL. TO EXERCISE OF DUE DILIGENCE AND DUE SPECIFIC TESTING OUT ON THE SITE, WHICH INCLUDES MORE THAN JUST PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO BORING. DURING THE COURSE OF THAT THEY'VE REACHED OUT TO ME AND SAID THAT THEY'VE QUALIFIED FOR A GRANT WITH THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND HAVE ENTERED INTO A RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM TO DO THE FULL EVALUATION OF THE SITE. TREASURE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL ASKED THE CITY TO AUTHORIZE THEM TO GO ON THE SITE ON BEHALF OF ASHLEY CAPITAL. AND I REVIEWED THE RESOLUTION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT WE ESSENTIALLY AUTHORIZED ASHLEY CAPITAL GO AND ASHLEY CAPITAL. COULD HAVE AUTHORIZED TRAGIC COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AS THEIR AGENT. BUT BECAUSE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IS A STATE AGENCY. IT HAS A POLICY THAT IT WON'T UM, TAKE THIRD PARTY AUTHORIZATIONS AND THEY NEEDED US TO SIGN THE DOCUMENT, WHICH AUTHORIZES THEM TO GO ONTO THE PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF ASHLEY CAPITAL TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EVALUATION. OF THE BROWN FIELD.

DETERMINATION TO DETERMINE WHAT WOULD BE NECESSARY WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF THE FLORIDA D. E P IN ORDER TO RESTORE THE PROPERTY TO A NO FURTHER ACTION STATUS TO ALLOW FOR ESSENTIALLY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE. UM ON THE SITE THE AGENDA ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION TONIGHT IS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THAT ACCESS AGREEMENT SO THAT THEY CAN GO OUT ON THE SITE.

THERE IS NO CONTRACT ENTERED FOR THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY AT ANY GIVEN PRICE. ASHLEY CAPITAL WANTED TO FIRST DO THE EVALUATION, DO THE DUE DILIGENCE AND REPORT BACK TO THE COMMISSION AS TO WHAT IT FOUND AND THEN NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMMISSION ON WHAT WOULD BE A FAIR AND MARKET PRICE FOR THE PURCHASE. AFTER THAT, SO BY VOTING TONIGHT. ALL YOUR VOTING FOR IS THAT ONE OF THE CONSULTANTS IS ALLOWED TO GO ON THE PROPERTY. UM IT'S MY POSITION THAT THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZED ASHLEY CAPITAL IN THEIR AGENTS AND CONSULTANTS TO PARTICIPATE ANYWAY, SO IT'S A FORMALITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR MARTEL, AND WE'RE NOT HIRING TRAGICALLY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL BY SIGNING IT. WE'RE NOT IMPROVING THE WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT. THANK YOU COUPLE. IT DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON IT? I'LL JUST MOVE FOR APPROVAL. OKAY? 1320 24 HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON FOUR. DON'T ROLL CALL. MAYOR BRUNER. YES MCDONALD . YES. NICE MAYOR RICH YES. COLLINS COMMISSIONER CLARK? YES?

[5. SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 328 RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THE LIVE LOCAL ACT (RC): RESOLUTION No. 12-2024; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 328 RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND IMPROVING UPON THE “LIVE LOCAL ACT,” PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED DURING THE 2023 FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE SESSION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

WE HAVE COMMISSIONED ACTION NUMBER FIVE SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 328 RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND THE LIVE LOCAL ACTS. BETTER MAYOR. MAY I AM THE ONE WHO HAS TO PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA. UM I WAS UP IN TALLAHASSEE AND THERE WAS A BRIEFING ON LEGISLATION THAT WAS COMING THROUGH AND THIS BILL WAS BROUGHT UP. AND WHAT? UH WHAT IT DOES IS THERE'S A FEW CLAWBACKS TO THE, UM TO THE PREEMPTION, INCLUDING SOME HEIGHTS THEM ISSUES INVOLVING LIMITING THE HEIGHT TO A QUARTER MILE FROM AN EXISTING BUILDING OF MAXIMUM 135% OF A BILL OF THE JASON BUILDINGS, HEIGHTS SOME THINGS THAT I THINK THAT WE ALL WOULD APPRECIATE BUT UM, WHEN I ASKED STAFF TO TAKE A LOOK AND REVIEW THIS BILL, SO WE KNEW WHAT WAS IN IT, UM THIS IS WHEN I DECIDED TO BRING IT FORWARD, UH, EXEMPT AREAS THAT ARE AIRPORT IMPACT IS DEFINED IN SECTION 333.03 OR FOUR TO STATUTE FROM REQUIREMENTS OF SENATE BILL ONE OR TWO. THIS APPLIES TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN 10,000 FT OF AN EXISTING AIRPORT RUNWAY. THAT IS THE BEST MAJORITY OF STEWART SOUTH OF THE BRIDGE. SO THIS WOULD EFFECTIVELY THIS BILL PASSES. IT WILL EFFECTIVELY TAKE THE BOOK EVERYTHING SOUTH OF THE BRIDGE FROM UH, REVIEW OF STAFF REVIEW OUT OF SENATE BILL 102, AND I'D LOVE TO HEAR STAFF'S RESPONSE TO THAT. BUT JUST BRIEFLY. I TOOK A MAP AND, UH,

[00:35:08]

TOOK THE ENDS OF THE RUNWAYS AND DID A 10,000 OF FEET. AND IT GOES. TO THE NORTH ALMOST DIRECTLY ACROSS THE RIVER. UM ALL THE WAY SO EVERYTHING FROM WHERE WE'RE STANDING RIGHT NOW EAST TO THE END OF STEWART WOULD BE NOT COVERED AND THEN TO THE WEST. THE ONLY THING THAT LITERALLY ISN'T WITHIN 10,000. FT IS LIKE THE FRASER OR THE, UM PARK AT THE END OF FLAGLER FAILURE PARK RIGHT HERE AT THE END, AND SUNSET BAY MARINA. EVERYTHING ELSE IS WITHIN THE 10,000 FT ALL THE WAY DOWN. INCLUDING WILLOUGHBY COUNTRY CLUB, WHICH IS NOT IN THE CITY.

BUT EVERYTHING LEADING UP TO WILLOUGHBY AND THEN THE US ONE CORRIDOR ALL THE WAY SOUTH TO THE VERY END OF STEWART, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MAYBE THE LAST 30 FT. OF WHAT'S KNOWN AS THE GUY, GAY TIME AND PROPERTY OR THE SPS HARDWARE'S OLD SITE ON THE SOUTH END OF TOWN. AND THEN AS IT RELATES TO LIKE THE AREA OF THE CITY, LIKE ALL OF ALL OF EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD AND INCLUDES ALL OF SORES POINT AND WE GO ALL THE WAY DOWN TO MANATEE POCKET. ALMOST SO WITH THE EXCEPTION OF JUST THOSE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROOSEVELT BRIDGE. EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE CITY IS STUART IS ESSENTIALLY REMOVED FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF SENATE BILL 102.

IF THIS. SENATE BILL 328 PASSES. AND THAT'S LINES 499 TO 5 OR WEIGHT OF THE BILL. THERE. WHICH ALSO INCLUDES WHAT'S IN THE MASTER PLAN, NOT EVEN WHAT EXISTS CORRECT. WHEN I LOOKED AT IT, IT WAS AIRPORT. IN THE MASTER PLAN, NOT EVEN LEE, DO YOU REMEMBER LOOKING AT THAT? THERE WERE OTHER. YEAH. LET ME PULL THAT UP. IT'S JUST AN INTERESTING POINT. YOU KNOW, UH CAT AND MOUSE. MAYBE THE COUNTY NEEDS TO INCLUDE SOME FUTURE AIRPORTS IN THEIR MASTER PLAN COUNTY HAS DOES HAVE A MASTER PLAN FOR AN AIRPORT? SO YES. BUT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU REALLY WANT TO DIG IT UP. I WAS RIGHT THERE. YOU HAVE IT. I GO FOR IT. IT'S ALL RIGHT, I GUESS, UM IT'S SAYING THAT SECTIONS UM DEALING WITH THE COUNTY AND THE CITY DO NOT APPLY IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING. IT'S BASICALLY SENATE BILL 10 TO IT'S AS MR MARTEL SAID IT EARLIER AS CODIFIED IN THE FLORIDA STATUTES 166. 0.04151 SUBSECTION SEVEN. I'M SURE WE'LL ALL REMEMBER THAT.

BUT, UM, THE FIRST, UM SAYS THAT THE CLAWBACK IS WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTION IS A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 10,000 FT OF THE NEAREST POINT OF ANY EXISTING AIRPORT RUNWAY. OR PLANNED AIRPORT. RUNWAY IDENTIFIED IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND I BELIEVE THERE'S THREE RUNWAYS AT THE MARTIN COUNTY AIRPORT. SO WHEN YOU TAKE THE 10,000 FT RADIUS, YOU CAN DO IT FROM THREE DIFFERENT POINTS, SO IT KIND OF EVEN COVERS MORE, UM, OF STEWART. UM AND SO THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE REFERENCING SO AND THAT'S PART OF THIS NEW SENATE BILL 328. AND THINKING ABOUT THIS. THIS THIS WAS MY ONLY CAUTION. OBVIOUSLY THIS WOULD BE AMAZING FOR THE CITY. IF THEY VOTED FOR THIS, RIGHT. THIS WOULD REALLY PROTECT US NOT SO MUCH THE COUNTY BUT FOR US, THIS WOULD BE A HUGE BLESSING. BUT I THINK OF PASCO COUNTY, WHO IS CURRENTLY SUING OVER SB 102, AND I JUST WONDER. THAT. WHAT THE UPSIDE WOULD BE HERE. I'M SURE TOBY AND GAIL ALL APPRECIATE US BEING IN SUPPORT OF WHAT THEY'RE DOING, BUT MY ASSUMPTION WOULD BE THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE HOW THEY'RE GOING TO VOTE. UM, BUT IF WE DO AS A BOARD OFFICIALLY THROUGH RESOLUTION EFFECTIVELY SUPPORT SB 12 AND BY SUPPORTING. WE BE HAMSTRINGING OURSELVES.

FROM A FUTURE COMMISSION. YOU KNOW, SUING OVER OVER THIS KIND OF AN ISSUE LIKE PASCO IS THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY THOUGHT. UM EVERYTHING ELSE IS AMAZING HERE, BUT JUST CRITICALLY LOOKING AT IT WITH MY ONLY CONCERN. I DON'T THINK IT HOLDS. KEEP THIS FROM SUING EVER OVER AFFORDED STATUE.

I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE STANDING TO SUE, BUT BUT DOES IT LOOK BAD, THOUGH, IF WE SUPPORTED IT, AND THEN WE'RE SUING? I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A LEGAL OPINION OVERBOARD. OH, YEAH. IT'S MORE OF A POLICY. DO YOU THINK IT LOOKS BAD? OR DO YOU THINK IT LOOKS GOOD? YOU COULD LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE OF THE RESOLUTION. AND IF YOU WANTED TO ADD CLARIFY CLARIFYING LANGUAGE TO THE RESOLUTION TO THE REASON, WHEREAS CLAUSES ARE IN RESOLUTIONS ARE TO PROVIDE THE

[00:40:04]

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND INTENT. SO IF YOU ADDED A WHEREAS CLAUSE AND SAID, WHEREAS BE BECAUSE OUTLINE FOR 99 TO LINE 508 IT EXEMPTS 96% OF THE CITY OF STEWART FROM THE THING OR BECAUSE THE AIRPORT LANGUAGE IS IN THERE. THE CITY OF STEWART IS SUPPORTING THIS LIKE THAT, IN THE FUTURE ACTS UP, IT WOULD BE CLEAR SENSE. I THINK IT'S I DO THINK THAT AGAIN. THERE WAS A DIFFERENT ATTITUDE AND MODE IN TALLAHASSEE THIS YEAR, AND I DO THINK THAT THEY THINK THAT MAYBE THEY GOT ENOUGH PUSHBACK WHERE WHEN I DID HEAR SOME LISTEN I DID HEAR THEM SEEMED LIKE THEY WERE LISTENING TO US MORE THIS YEAR, AND I THINK THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO BE POSITIVE ABOUT WHEN THEY DO LISTEN TO US. SO MAYBE IF WE COULD ADD THE LANGUAGE THAT REFERENCES THE THAT THAT THOSE THREE OR FOUR LINES AND THANK YOU. OKAY, SO IF YOU'RE GOOD WITH THAT, I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION WITH THOSE CHANGES, FINISHED COMMISSIONER NO, WE'RE NOT REALLY GETTING ANY MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANYWAY, BUT IT'S CALLED THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT. BEFORE THAT. I WAS JUST GONNA SAY THIS WAS THE BEST LOOKING VEN DIAGRAM I EVER SAW WHEN MIKE MORTELL SHOWED ME. I MEAN LAST YEAR, THIS BILL WAS CREATED DREAD IN IN ALL FLORIDA MUNICIPALITIES AND. THIS VERY PRACTICAL EXEMPTION THEY HAD TO COME UP WITH SO THAT AIRPLANES WEREN'T FLYING INTO BUILDINGS. UM JUST LETS THE CITY OFF SCOTT FREE, AND IT'S TERRIFIC. IN FACT , LAST YEAR, MR MARTEL WAS IT AFTER THIS LAW PASSED AND WE HAVE A PROPERTY OWNER. HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO NOT GO WITH APPROVAL HE HAD AND ACTUALLY WAS. LOOKING AT MAXINE OUT HIS DEVELOPMENT BASED ON 102 SO AND I KNOW IT, YOU KNOW, IN OTHER COUNTIES AND CITIES AROUND THE STATE, THIS IS BEEN HAPPENING. SO WE'VE BEEN VERY, VERY LUCKY AND THANK YOU TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR COMING TO THEIR SENSES. THANK YOU. WE NEED THE CITY ATTORNEY TO READ THE TITLE BEFORE I NEVER HAD THE CHANCE TO DO THAT. SO RESOLUTION NUMBER 12-20 TO 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 328 RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND IMPROVING UPON THE LIVE LOCAL ACT PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED DURING THE 2023 FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE SESSION. PROVIDING FORWARD AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. THANK YOU. DID SOMEONE MAKE A MOTION? MADAM MAYOR MADE A MOTION. SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND AND I DO HAVE A PUBLIC COMMENT. YES MR CARTWRIGHT. WOULD YOU COME FORWARD? PLEASE SPEAK. NUMBER FIVE. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS . THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION AND EXPLANATION OF WHAT THE RESOLUTION COULD OR COULD NOT COVER, BUT I HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT YOUR RESOLUTION AS A WHOLE. I DON'T AGREE WITH SENATE BILL 102, AND NOT MANY DID OR DO IT'S INTENTIONALLY VAGUE AND DOESN'T TRULY ADDRESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIKE IT SAYS IT DOES, OR THAT IT SHOULD. SO YOU HAVE A RESOLUTION THAT YOU SAY WILL EXEMPT THE CITY FROM A MAJORITY OF THE SENATE BILL, BUT DOES IT? WHAT IF THE SENATE DOESN'T PASS THE BILL? WHAT ARE THE CAVEATS, AND FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND A DEVELOPER CAN STILL APPEAL TO TALLAHASSEE AND OVERRIDE WHAT YOU'RE DECLARING BECAUSE WE AS A CITY DO NOT INCLUDE THINGS LIKE OUR OWN CLAWBACK MEASURES, SO WHEN WE START, INCLUDING THEM AS PART OF OUR APPROVALS, OR EVEN AS A PART OF THIS RESOLUTION AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO. BUT WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING DOESN'T FIX THE SENATE BILL, AND IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T FIX AFFORDABILITY IN THE CITY FOR CONTEXT. FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT AWARE FROM THE CITY OF STEWART'S OWN HOUSING AUTHORITY WAITING LIST IN APRIL OF 2023, THERE WERE 1340 APPLICANTS, WITH ONE PERSON MOVING OUT IN ONE PERSON MOVING IN IN JULY. 1526 APPLICANTS ONE OUT ONE END SEPTEMBER 1648 APPLICANTS ZERO OUT ZERO IN NOVEMBER 1733 APPLICANTS WITH ONE MOVE OUT IN ONE MOVE IN AND GRANTED. THIS IS TRULY SUBSIDIZED HOUSING, BUT IT SHOWS THAT THERE IS A NEED IN OUR COMMUNITY. AND THEN THERE'S THE PEOPLE WHO DON'T EVEN QUALIFY FOR ASSISTANCE, BECAUSE EVEN IF THEY DID, IT WOULDN'T MATTER BECAUSE THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AVAILABLE. EVEN BEFORE SENATE BILL ONE OR TWO, YOU WERE APPROVING, AFFORDABLE OR ATTAINABLE HOUSING , AND A DEVELOPER SIMPLY HAD TO SAY THAT THEY WERE GOING TO MAKE IT AVAILABLE. WHEN THEY DID THAT YOU APPROVED MAXIMUM DENSITY IS MORE OFTEN THAN NOT BASED ON THAT PROMISE AND PROMISE. A DEVELOPER DID NOT AND DOES NOT HAVE TO SUBMIT ANY REPORTS. THERE'S NO ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE CITY. THERE IS NO CITY STAFF WHO CHECKS ON IT. AND SO WHAT ENDS UP HAPPENING IS WE HAVE MAXIMUM DENSITIES, AND THE DEVELOPER JUST HAS TO SAY THAT NOBODY APPLIED OR QUALIFIED, AND THEREFORE THOSE UNITS ARE BACK

[00:45:01]

ON THE MARKET AT MARKET RATE, AND THAT'S ASSUMING THAT SOMEONE FROM THE CITY EVEN ASKED THEM.

AS WITH THE CITY APPROVALS, THERE'S NO STATE ACCOUNTABILITY. THERE'S NOBODY AT THE STATE MONITORING WHAT'S BEING BUILT UNDER THE GUISE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND THERE'S STILL NOBODY THAT CITY OR COUNTY LEVEL WHO WILL BE TRACKING ANYTHING THAT GETS APPROVED USING THE SENATE BILL AS RATIONALE FOR BUILDING IF YOU'RE GOING TO USE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SAY YOU WERE TAKING A STAND TO PROTECT HOME RULE, IT WOULD BE NICE IF YOU PURSUED SOMETHING TRULY MEANINGFUL WITH THE SAME GUSTO TO TRULY HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT. I ENCOURAGE YOU TO LOOK AT WHAT JACKSONVILLE IS DOING WITH CORNER LOT. IT'S A GREAT EXAMPLE AS TO HOW TO ACCOMPLISH A REASONABLE, FEASIBLE AND SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. SO WHILE I APPRECIATE WHAT THIS RESOLUTION IS GOING TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH, IT MAY BE A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. IT'S NOT ENOUGH FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS. THANK YOU, ROBERT. OKAY, CAN WE HAVE A REAL CALL? MAYOR RICH. YES COMMISSIONER CLARK? YES COLLINS. COMMISSIONER MCDONALD. YES.

BRUNER? YES. ALL RIGHT. MOVE ON TO SIX. HC A PRE STANDING. THIS IS OUR ORDINANCE. SECOND READING

[6. HCA FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM - MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SITE PLAN (QJ)(RC): ORDINANCE No. 2526-2024; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA GRANTING A THIRD MAJOR AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2297-2014, AKA THE 7.24-ACRE, 4-LOT WAWA GAS STATION & CONVENIENCE STORE MASTER COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (“CPUD”), THEREBY APPROVING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LOT 3 CONSISTING OF AN 11,570 SQUARE FOOT FREE STANDING EMERGENCY ROOM AND PROVIDING FOR NEW, RESTATED, AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, INCLUDING A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT; SAID PROPERTY BEING GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SR 76 & S.E. MONTEREY ROAD, BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BY EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED; DECLARING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; REPEALING ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; ACCEPTABLE BY THE APPLICANT; AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]

CH FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SITE PLAN.

QUITE JUDICIAL. UM LEAVE. THANK YOU, MAYOR. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2526-202, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, GRANTING A THIRD MAJOR AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2297-201. ALSO KNOWN AS THE 7.24 ACRE. FOR LOT, HUAHUA GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE MASTER COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. CPU, D. THEREBY APPROVING A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A LOT THREE CONSISTING OF AN 11,570 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM AND PROVIDING FOR NEW RESTATED AND AMENDED AMENDED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS. INCLUDING A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT. CORNER OF STATE ROAD 76 IN SOUTHEAST MONTEREY ROAD BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BY EXHIBIT A ATTACHED DECLARING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. REPEALING ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY CLAUSE ACCEPTABLE BY THE APPLICANT AND INEFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. THANK YOU. AGAIN. THIS IS THE SECOND READING, BUT MY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. TO DISCLOSE I HAVE MET WITH THIS STAFF AND WITH THE DEVELOPER PREVIOUSLY. WHAT SINCE THE LAST MEETING. I HAVE NOT. TALK TO THEM. I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. I HAVE NONE. UM YES, I MET WITH THE APPLICANT. PRIOR TO THE LAST MEETING, BUT NO ADDITIONAL CONTEXT SINCE THEN. I HAVE NO NEEDED NO NOTHING SINCE THE LAST WHAT WAS DISCLOSED AT THE LAST MEETING. I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. OKAY? AN ATTORNEY LEADS TO PLACE ANY POTENTIAL WITNESSES UNDER OATH. BUT I MEAN. FROM THAT, YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO PROVIDE TO BE THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. DO WE NOT SAY SO HELP ME GOD AT THE END OF OUR OATHS. SO HELP ME GOD. THANK YOU. KIND OF HERE WE GO. WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE AGENDA.

THANK YOU. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO DO A FULL PRESENTATION? MAYBE. MAYBE WE DON'T. AND IT'S THE COMMISSIONERS. GO AHEAD AND. GIVE LOVE. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES SINCE LAST MEETING? THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGES. WE JUST HAVE TO GO OVER JUST A FEW QUICK CHANGES AND THE ORDINANCE JUST SOME TYPE OF ERRORS THAT THE APPLICANT ONES JUST LIKE TO ADDRESS. OKAY, LET'S DO THAT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER AS VICE MAYOR, MAYOR. I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME TONIGHT. I REALIZE YOU'VE GOT A BUSY SCHEDULE. UM, JUST REALLY QUICK. SO OF COURSE MY NAME IS AUDREY CREECH. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. I'M ALSO ATTORNEY FROM GANGSTER. THE APPLICANT IS HD A SAY, UM, FLORIDA ST LUCIE HOSPITAL. AND AS YOU STATED, WE PROPOSE A FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM ON LOT THREE OF THE CPU D. SO WE'RE HERE FOR A MAJOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE CPU, D. NOW THE CITY OF STEWART, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT , MRS JODI NETWORK, KUGLER WAS CORRECT. THERE ARE SOME CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCE SINCE THE ORDINANCE HAD TO BE SUBMITTED.

PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. MOST OF THE CHANGES ARE TYPOGRAPHICAL AND NATURE TO FIX SOME

[00:50:04]

GRAMMATICAL ISSUES. SOME CLERICAL ISSUES, HOWEVER, THERE ARE TWO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES THAT I WANT TO MAKE YOU ALL AWARE OF SO THE FIRST SUBSTITUTE CHANGE IS THE CHANGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE, THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE CITY HAD JUNE 30TH 2024, WHICH IS SIX MONTHS OR SO FROM NOW AND JUNE 30TH 2025 TO COMPLETE EVERYTHING THAT NEEDED TO HAPPEN AFTER THIS APPROVAL TO GET THE FSC ARE BUILT. UH THE APPLICANT FEELS THAT THAT IS A LITTLE TIGHT, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE JUNE 30TH 2024 DATE IS ONLY SIX MONTHS AWAY. SO WE SUGGESTED TO MISS JODY NETWORK KUGLER THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO EXTEND THAT EXTEND THOSE TWO DATES THE FIRST ONE TO JUNE 30TH 2025. SO ONE YEAR AND THEN THE SECOND DATE TO JUNE 30TH 2026 ONCE AGAIN JUST A YEAR ON THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED DATE, SO THAT'S ONE ITEM. THE OTHER ITEM IS THAT UNFORTUNATELY, FOR WHATEVER REASON, THE ORDINANCE YOU HAVE IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET AT THIS TIME REFERS TO AN EXHIBIT B, BUT IT DOES NOT ACTUALLY INCLUDE EXHIBIT. SO I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THAT BE SOMETHING THAT BE CHANGED AS TO THE FINAL ORDINANCE, SO AT THIS TIME IF WE ARE PREPARED TO GIVE A PRESENTATION, BUT WE FIGURED YOU ALL HAD SEEN IT BEFORE, AND IT HASN'T CHANGED. SO YOU MAY NOT WANT TO SEE IT, BUT THAT IS COMPLETELY UP TO YOUR DISCRETION AT THIS TIME. IF YOU DO NOT CHOOSE TO HAVE THE PRESENTATION AGAIN, WE WILL ASK. I WILL ASK ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT THAT YOU APPROVE THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE CPU D TO DEVELOP LOT THREE INTO AN FSC ARE FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM. AND THAT YOU APPROVE IT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MRS NETWORK KUGLER WILL BE MAKING THE TYPOGRAPHICAL CHANGES THAT WE PROVIDED TO HER, AS WELL AS THE CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT TIMETABLE THAT I DISCUSSED AND THE ADDITION OTHER THAN THAT, IF YOU ALL HAVE NO QUESTIONS. THAT'S THE END OF MY PRESENTATION. ASSUMING YOU DON'T WANT ME TO DO A PRESENTATION, BUT IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS WERE PERFECTLY ABLE TO ANSWER THEM COMPLETELY UP TO YOU . COMMISSIONER COMPANY QUESTION WHAT'S THE RATIONALE FOR ADDING A YEAR UNDER THAT TIMETABLE, JUST SIMPLY THAT THE CLIENT FELT SIX MONTHS WAS A LITTLE TIGHT BECAUSE WE GET THE APPROVAL FROM YOU. WE HAVE TO GET BUILDING PERMITS, WHICH CAN TAKE SOME TIME. AND ADDITIONALLY WE THEN HAVE TO ACTUALLY BUILD THE PROPERTY, BUILD THE ACTUAL STRUCTURE. SO SIX MONTHS IS A LITTLE TIGHT FOR THAT. WE WOULD PREFER THAT WE GET THE DATES THAT WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH. IN THE FIRST ORDINANCE AND NOT HAVE TO COME BACK TO YOU FOR ANY KIND OF EXTENSIONS. THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD PREFER, UM, WE CAN, IN THEORY COME BACK TO YOU FOR EXTENSIONS, BUT WE WOULD PREFER JUST TO HAVE THE RIGHT DATES THE FIRST TIME THAT WAY WE DON'T HAVE TO, AND WE CAN BUILD AND DEVELOP AND MAKE IT HAPPEN. MIKE IS THERE EARLY? IS THERE ANY REASON WHY THAT WOULD BE A LIABILITY FOR US. REALITY OF IT IS THE TIMETABLES BASED UPON EMERGENCIES AND FLORIDA. OR ACTUALLY VERY FEW END UP. EVEN HAVING TO FOLLOW THEIR GUIDELINES ARE DEADLINES ANYWAY, BECAUSE ANYTIME AN EMERGENCY IS ENTERED BY THE GOVERNOR, THERE'S AN AUTOMATIC EXTENSION AND THERE'S EMERGENCIES ENTERED ALL THE TIME FOR RANDOM REASONS. SO REALLY? NO, OKAY. SECOND. ANY OTHER ANY OTHER COMMENTS, REPRESENTATIVE? YES. MICHAEL BARBERA, HEAD OF OPERATIONS.

WELCOME, MR RIVERA. GOOD EVENING , EVERYBODY. MY NAME IS MICHAEL BARBERO AND THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF A SAFE FOR HIS ENGLISH HOSPITAL. SO MR BARBERA HAD A VERY INTERESTING PAUL AND LENGTHY DISCUSSION WITH THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CLEVELAND CLINIC HERE. AND THE ASSERTION WAS MADE THAT THE PRESENCE OF THIS FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM THREATENS THE VIABILITY OF THEIR MODEL IN THE COUNTY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COMMENT ON THAT? BECAUSE WELL, SEEING THAT I AM WITH H A.

I DO NOT KNOW THEIR MODEL. FOR THAT PIECE. WE'RE HERE FOR THE COMMUNITY WHERE HERE TO OPEN UP ANOTHER ACCESS POINT FOR EMERGENCY CARE THAT AS YOU GUYS CONTINUE TO GROW AND AS YOU CONTINUE TO KNEAD THE SERVICES. WE'RE HERE TO PROVIDE IT AND PROVIDED INVEST TIME WE HAVE THIS DOES CLEVELAND CLINIC HAVE FACILITIES UP IN ST LUCIE COUNTY? WHERE YOU COMPETE. I DO NOT THINK SO. NO, THEY DON'T. IT'S AN INTERESTING SO THE MOST COMMON COMPLAINT I RECEIVED FROM PEOPLE IS ABOUT THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE CURRENTLY IN THE COUNTY. THERE'S VERY LITTLE WE

[00:55:05]

HAVE TO DO WITH THAT. BUT. I GOT, YOU KNOW. IT RAISES TWO INTERESTING POINTS, ONE DEALS WITH BOTH DISH ISSUE IN THE NEXT ONE IS SHOULD THE CITY BE ABLE TO CHOOSE WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESSES WE ALLOW? AND YOU KNOW IT'S CERTAIN AREAS AND UNCERTAIN PIECE OF PROPERTY AND LUCKILY WERE NOT ABLE TO DO THAT, AS LONG AS THEY CONFORM TO THE GENERAL USES THAT IS IN THE CODE AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. RIGHT. WE HAVE TO PERMIT IT. UM. BUT I'M WONDERING IF MAYBE, AND WE HAVE A JOINT MEETING COMING UP WITH THE COUNTY AND A FEW WEEKS AND IF WE NEED TO ADDRESS THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT ISSUE, NOT JUST IN MARTIN COUNTY, NOT JUST IN THE CITY STORE, BUT YOU KNOW THE QUALITY OF CARE AND DOES THE PRESENCE OF HMM. I MEAN, WHAT RESPONSIBILITY DO WE HAVE? TO ENSURE THE VIABILITY OF THE MEDICAL SYSTEM WE RELY ON. THIS IS MORE OF A QUESTION. THERE'S MORE OF A COMMENT THAN A QUESTION. I'M SORRY TO BRING THAT ON YOU. BUT UH, I WAS. I WAS STRUCK BY THE CONCERNS THAT WERE SHARED WITH ME AND WE NEED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES AT SOME POINT. I THINK THIS IS A GOOD STEP. AND I LOOK FORWARD TO YOU BEING THERE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WOULD JUST SAY I HOPE YOU MAKE THE MARKETPLACE VERY COMPETITIVE SO THAT THE LEVEL OF CARE GOES UP FOR EVERYBODY AROUND. SO WE ARE HERE TO CARE FOR THE COMMUNITY. MOTHER MAYOR, I WAS GOING TO RESPOND TO COMMISSIONER CAMPBELL'S RICH. UM. I DIDN'T WANT TO SOUND TOO CLICHE. THAT'S WHY I DIDN'T WANT TO. JUMP UP AND RESPOND RIGHT AWAY. BUT YOU KNOW WHEN WE DO THESE THINGS, AND WE TALK ABOUT BUSINESSES, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO HOUSING, WHETHER IT'S A PRICE OF THE HOUSING OR WHETHER IT'S HIGH OR LOW. WE TEND TO SAY THE MARKET DICTATES AND I HEAR COMMISSIONER COLLINS AND PORSCHE CAMPBELL'S KIND OF SAYING THAT SO I JUST HOPE THAT WHATEVER IF, IF THIS IS APPROVED THAT WILL GET GOOD SERVICE AND THAT WILL CONTINUE TO, UM HAVE A ROBUST HEALTHCARE MARKETS IN THIS AREA.

YES, MA'AM. MS MAD AMERICAN. I MAKE A MOTION BEFORE THE PUBLIC GETS A CHANCE TO COMMENT ON SOMEBODY ELSE HAS A REGARDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 25 26 2024. THAT THIS COMMISSION APPROVES THIS, UM, PROPOSAL ON THE SECOND READING. OF THIS EIGHT CH FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM. ON CANADA HIGHWAY. 2ND 2ND. THE MOTION AND A SECOND DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? NEVER DON'T. THIS WAS DONE. SEVEN OKAY? SORRY UH, THE APPLICANT ASKED FOR APPROVAL OF THE REVISED CONDITIONS THAT YOU SUGGESTED PERFECT. JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE COOPERATED AND MY SECOND INCORPORATE SOME ALSO, I HOPE THAT THIS CLERK AND THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR HAS THOSE THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, MARY. SHE'S GOT IT REAL COLD. COMMISSIONER MCDONALD RICH. YES BRUNER. YES COLLINS CLARKE? YES. YOU'RE WELCOME. IS IT GONNA BE? ITEM SEVEN. GOOD. THANKS. THIS

[7. 101 S. COLORADO RESTAURANT - REZONE TO URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SITE PLAN APPROVAL (QJ)(RC): ORDINANCE No. 2524-2023; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A REZONING FROM URBAN WATERFRONT TO URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A 0.234 ACRE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 101 S. COLORADO AVENUE, SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED; ESTABLISHING THE COLORADO WATERFRONT RESTAURANT (UPUD); TO RE-PURPOSE THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING FOR A 150-SEAT RESTAURANT AND PROVIDE RELIEF FROM VARIOUS PARKING REQUIREMENTS; APPROVING A FINAL SITE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS INCLUDING A TIMEABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT, DECLARING THE PLAN WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND OTHER PURPOSES.]

IS ORDINANCE THE FIRST READING 101 SOUTH COLORADO RESTAURANT REZONED TO URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SITE PLANNING APPROVAL. THIS IS A CROSS EYED JUDICIALES ALSO EXACTLY THANK YOU. MAYOR. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2524-20 TO 3. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, APPROVING A REZONING FROM URBAN WATERFRONT TO URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. OR A 0.234 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 SOUTH COLORADO AVENUE, SAID LAND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED ESTABLISHING THE COLORADO WATERFRONT RESTAURANT UPU, D. TO REPURPOSE THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING FOR A 150 SEAT RESTAURANT. AND PROVIDE RELIEF FROM VARIOUS PARKING REQUIREMENTS. APPROVING A FINAL SITE PLAN. PROVIDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS, INCLUDING A TIMETABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT. DECLARING THE PLAN WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PROVIDING DIRECTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK.

[01:00:06]

PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND CONFLICT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IF YOU. DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE BEEN THE EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. I SPOKE WITH THE APPLICANT AND I'VE ALSO SPOKE WITH RESIDENTS AND I'M HERE WITH OPEN MINDS. MY TO HAVE SPOKEN COMMUNITY OWNER AND MOST OF THE RESIDENCES AND LETTERS AND EMAILS AND TALKING ON THE PHONE. I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN LINE. I'VE SPOKEN WITH THE APPLICANT AND NUMEROUS RESIDENTS. AND I AM HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. I HAVE SPOKEN WITH RESIDENTS AND THE APPLICANT. HAVE MET WITH THE APPLICANT, MR SCHAMBACH IN HIS REPRESENTATIVE.

TWO STAFF. I HAVE SEEN COMMUNICATION FROM RESIDENTS. I'M HERE WITH AN OPEN MIND. WE HAVE TO GET THE ALL THE. EXCUSE ME TO PLANNERS, ALL THE WITNESSES WE NEED TO SWEAR YOU IN. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, TOO. YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO PROVIDE WITH THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD. OKAY, THANK YOU RECEDED. ALRIGHT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY. THERE WERE YOU, UM, PRESENTATION AGENDA. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR BRENNER AND COMMISSIONERS FOR THE RECORD. MY NAME IS JODY COOGLER, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT. TONIGHT. AL PRESENTING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN FOR AN URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONED PETITION AND A FINAL SITE PLAN FOR 101 SOUTH COLORADO AVENUE RESTAURANT. THE APPLICANT IS 101. COLORADO. L.

L. C. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FOR WAIVERS. AS PART OF THIS PETITION A PARKING EXEMPTION ON SITE A OFFSITE VALET PARKING WITH THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENT. AN ADDITIONAL CURB CUT AND TO REMOVAL OF ONE CITY OWNED ON STREET PARKING SPACE. THIS ITEM IS QUASI JUDICIAL. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN SECTION 11.02 0.05 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE APPLICANT MALE 33 LETTERS TO ADJACENT OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN 300, FT OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL. IT PROVIDED THE DEVELOPMENT, THE DETAILS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND DATE AND TIMES OF TONIGHT'S MEETING ADDITIONALLY ASSIGNED WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY ALONG SOUTH COLORADO AVENUE WITH THIS SAME INFORMATION. THE 0.23 ACRE DEVELOPED PROPERTY IS SITUATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH COLORADO AVENUE, NORTHEAST SOUTHEAST 17TH STREET AND DIRECTLY EAST OF I'M SORRY DIRECTLY NORTH. THE ST LUCIE RIVER. THIS PROPERTY IS ALSO SITUATED IN THE CITY'S COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA IN THE URBAN DISTRICT. THE SUBJECT. PARCELS ALSO IS ALSO SURROUNDED PROPERTIES DESIGNATED BY THE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT, FUTURE LAND USE. PERSONAL PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE DESIGNATED AS THE URBAN WATER FART ZONING DISTRICT AND THE PROPERTY TO US IS DESIGNATED URBAN CENTER. AGAIN THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND THIS IS A DEPARTURE FROM THE STRICT APPLICATION OF USE, SETBACK, PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD ZONING DISTRICTS. A PRIMARY PURPOSE TO PROVIDE A SET ZONING REQUIREMENTS IS AS A STARTING POINT WHICH FLEXIBLE FLEXIBILITY MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAINTAINING AND PROTECTING THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS. THE FIRST. THE FIRST REQUEST FROM THE PETITIONER IS THEY ARE REQUESTING RELIEF FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 6.01 0.09 E, WHICH IS THE STUART PARKING CODE. THEY ARE REQUESTING TO HAVE THE ENTIRE SITE TO BE PARTYING EXEMPT. UM AND WITHIN THE URBAN CENTER AND URBAN CODE AND IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT.

THIS PROPERTY IF IT HAD TO BE PARKED. WE REQUIRE 38 PARKING SPACES ON SITE BASED ON THE 150 SEATS. UM, THE PROPOSED. IN RETURN, THE CITY WOULD OBTAIN THE REPAIRING WRITES FOR THE BOARDWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THIS IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS YOU CAN SEE IN PINK. THAT IS THE ORIGINAL BUILDING THAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO REPURPOSE. THE PROPERTY THAT'S IN THE LIGHT BLUE. THE DARK BLUE AND ORANGE ARE THE ADDITION TO THE SITE.

THE ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS 1183 SQUARE FEET, AND IT WAS USED AS AN OFFICE BUILDING AND THE PROPOSED RESTAURANT WILL BE 3101 12 112 FT SQUARE FEET WITH 100 50 SEATS. THE AREA IS IN CLOSE

[01:05:01]

PROXIMITY OF THE OLD DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. UM, THE OLD TOWN DISTRICT. IS IT A PARKING EXEMPTION AREA THAT APPLIES TO THE FLOOR? SPACES THAT EXIST AS A JANUARY 1ST 22,004, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE MAP DOES IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS OF WHERE THOSE PROPERTIES ARE EXEMPT CURRENTLY TODAY THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN RED IS THE PROPERTY THAT THAT IS AT TONIGHT'S DISCUSSION. IT IS OUTSIDE OF THE BOUNDARY. UM IF THIS PROPERTY WAS CONSIDERED PART OF THE BOUNDARY, OR THE LINES WERE EXTENDED INTO THE PARKING EXEMPTION AREA. THE APPLICANT WOULD ONLY BE GRANDFATHERED IN FOR THE ORIGINAL 1183 SQUARE FEET. ADDITIONALLY THERE IS A AREA CALLED THE DOWNTOWN SATURATION DISTRICT IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS THE EXEMPTION AREA EXCEPT FOR THE PROPERTIES ALONG THE NORTH SIDE THAT'S CIRCLED IN RED. UM IN 2012, THESE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH WERE ADDED TO THE PARKING EXEMPTION AS PART OF THE NEGOTIATIONS EXTEND THE BOARDWALK BEHIND THESE PROPERTIES TO COLORADO AVENUE. HOWEVER, THESE PARCELS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SATURATION AREA. THE SATURATION AREA WAS CREATED TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED FOR RESTAURANTS, NIGHTCLUBS AND OTHER ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AND OUR ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. THE OLD DOWNTOWN DISTRICT WAS ESTABLISHED AS THE SATURATION AREA. AGAIN THE SATURATION AREA REGULATES HOURS OF OPERATION, DISTANT REQUIREMENTS AND CERTAIN TYPES OF ESTABLISHMENTS PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN A STATUTORY SATURATION AREA ARE SUBJECT TO ZONING APPROVAL. THE SATURATION LEVEL MEANS AND ESTABLISHMENT FLOOR AREA OF NOT MORE THAN 30% AND CANNOT GO OVER THE 30% THRESHOLD. CURRENTLY IN 2020. WE ARE OVER THE 30% SO WE CAN NO LONGER ISSUE ANY MORE LIQUOR LICENSE WITHIN THE SATURATION AREA IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. UH FOR THE PURPOSE. THIS IS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE TO FOLLOW. WHAT THE STATE TO OBTAIN A, UH, ESPECIAL LIQUOR LICENSE WAS CALLED THE FOUR C. O P. S. R S. AND TO ATTAIN THAT THEY MUST HAVE 202,000 SQUARE FOOT OF SERVICE AREA. AND THEY MUST SERVE 120 PATRONS. THE PETITIONERS REQUEST NUMBER TWO IS THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES AGAIN. THIS WAS REQUESTED TO SINCE THE PROPERTY IS REQUESTED TO BE PARKING EXEMPTION, THEY WILL HAVE TO LOCATE THE PARKING SOMEWHERE ELSE. THEY'RE LOOKING TO MOVE THE PARKING TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION DOWN SEMINOLE STREET. UM IT'S A PROCESS. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 675 FT. THE CODE REQUIRES THAT THEY MUST BE A MAXIMUM 500 FT. SO THEY WERE ASKING TO BE WEIGHED FROM THAT. THAT REQUIREMENT. THE PARKING IS A. LOCATED AT 111 SOUTHEAST OSCEOLA STREET. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE RED DIAGRAM IS THE UM, FOOT TRAFFIC THAT THEY WOULD BE GOING BACK AND FORTH TO TAKE THE CARS FROM 101, SOUTH COLORADO 2111 SOUTHEAST OSCEOLA STREET. UM THAT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW IN MEDICAL BUILDING, AND IT'S PRETTY MUCH CLOSED AT NIGHT SO THEY WOULD UTILIZE VALET PARKING AT NIGHT. AGAIN THIS IS THE LAYOUT OF THE OFFSITE PARKING SPACE. YOU CAN SEE THEY'RE THEY'RE ENTERING ON TO DENVER, AND THEY'LL CIRCLE BACK AROUND AND GO AROUND THE BLOCK BACK TO ONE ON ONE SOCCER COLORADO WHEN PICKING UP OR DELIVERING CARS TO THE SITE. THIS IS THE TRAFFIC GENERATION. TYPICALLY IN THIS AREA. THEY ARE EXEMPT FROM TRAFFIC, HOWEVER, WHEN AN APPLICANT APPLIES FOR A CONDITIONAL USE OR I PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A TRAFFIC STATEMENT. IN THIS CASE, THE, UH PART OF THE TRAFFIC TRIPS ARE 390 DAILY TRIPS INCREASED. OUR TRAFFIC CONSULTANT, KIMBERLY HORN HAD REVIEWED THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED BY SUSAN O'ROURKE. AND FOR ACCURACY. PETITIONS ARE COSTING NUMBER THREE IS TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL CURB CUT. UM CURRENTLY THEY HAVE OCCURRED CUT LOCATED ON SOUTH COLORADO AVENUE . AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE RENDERING. IT'S POINTED IN THE RED ARROW THAT IS THE CURRENT EXISTING LOCATION. AND THEY ARE REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL LOCATION ON SEMINAL STREET. FOR AND GRASS. THE LOCATION. OF THOSE TWO PARKING CURB CUTS ARE LOCATED ON SOUTH COLORADO, AND THE GRASS WILL BE FROM SOUTH FROM SEMINAL STREET. IS THAT THOSE TWO BLUE THINGS? THEY'RE YES, MA'AM. THOSE ARE THE TWO BLUE AREAS SHOWING THE ACTUALLY LOCATIONS THAT WERE POTENTIALLY WHERE THERE'S CURB CUTS WILL BE AND THAT'S THE HELP THE CIRCULATION AS YOU'LL SEE IN THE NEXT SLIDE WILL SHOW THE CIRCULATION OF THE BALLET WHEN

[01:10:01]

YOU'RE ENTERING OFFICE, SOUTH COLORADO AND THEN CIRCLING OUT THE EGRESS ONTO SEMINAL STREET.

THE REQUEST NUMBER FOUR IS THE REMOVAL OF THE CITY OWNED ON STREET PARKING SPACE TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE SIDE ALONG SOUTH COLORADO AVENUE AND FOR FIRE TRUCK ACCESS. THIS IS CURRENTLY HOW THE SITE PLAN IS SITUATED. AS YOU CAN SEE, COLORADO'S DOWN THERE, UM, WHERE YOU SEE OUR FIRE TRUCK? THAT'S WHERE THEIR PROPOSED TO PARK UM THEY NEED THAT FOR ACCESS. THERE IS NO OTHER LOCATION, TOO. TO BE ABLE TO MANEUVER OUR APPARATUS THROUGH THIS SITE IF THERE WAS A FIRE UM SO THERE THE SPACE THAT THEY'RE LOOKING AT IS TO REMOVE IS RIGHT WHERE THE FIRE TRUCKS IS TODAY OR WHERE IT IS IN THE PICTURE. AND THEY ALSO ARE SHIFTING THE CURB CUT AT THAT AREA SO THEY CAN GAIN ACCESS INTO THE SITE. THESE ARE FEW PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. UM THAT YOU CAN SEE THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH THE SITE PLAN PROCESS AND WE'RE UNDER THE URBAN DISTRICT AND THEY'VE MET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS MEETING THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. AGAIN THIS IS THIS IS THE PROPOSED ARTWORK. THIS WILL BE COMING BACK TO THE CRB BOARD FOR FINAL APPROVAL IF THE BORDER IS APPROVED THIS PROJECT. THIS IS A RADIUS MAP SHOWING THAT 33 PUBLIC NOTICES LETTERS FROM MAIL TO PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN 300 FT. OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE CITY RECEIVED 16 LETTERS DURING THE CRB PROCESS IN FAVOR AND I SIGNED PETITION WAS RECEIVED AFTER THE CRB WITH 59 SIGNATURES, NOT IN FAVOR. ON NOVEMBER 7TH 2023, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, HOW THE PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSS THE REZONING TO URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PETITION SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. THE BOARD VOTED 3 TO 1, WITH TWO BOARD MEMBERS BEING ABSENT FROM THE VOTE AND FLORIDA RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION, WITH SUGGESTED CONDITIONS TO BE ADDED NUMBER ONE WHEN THE RESTAURANT IS OPEN. THE VALLEY OPERATES IN THE EVENING. AND TO THERE BE NO OUTDOOR MUSIC. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE A SMALL PRESENTATION. AS WELL. PETITIONER COME FORWARD. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS NICK SCHROTH. REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AFRICAN TONIGHT WITH MIKE MCCARTY. DR SAM BACK AND QUESTIONING BACKS FAMILY, UM MY INVOLVEMENT IN THIS PROPERTY IS KIND OF ARE NOT IN KEEPING WITH WHAT OUR FIRM USUALLY DOES. BUT, UM WE'VE WORKED WITH DR SAM BACK ON VARIOUS REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS OVER THE YEARS, AND SO WHEN HIS MOTHER WAS PLANNING TO SELL THIS PROPERTY AND RETIRE HE CALLED ME AND SAID, HEY, YOU KNOW I HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BUY BUY THIS HOUSE. IT'S BEEN IN OUR FAMILY FOR A WHILE, AND I'D LIKE TO KEEP IT IN OUR FAMILY. SO BUT WHAT DO I? WHAT CAN I DO WITH THIS? AND THE CONVERSATION WAS PRETTY LENGTHY ONE. YOU KNOW, MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS THAT YOU KNOW, TALKED ABOUT BUILDING CONDOS AND BURGOS AND VARIOUS OTHER THINGS, BUT YOU KNOW, IT ALL KIND OF CAME BACK TO, YOU KNOW, PRESERVING WHAT'S THERE AND KEEPING A LITTLE BIT OF WHAT'S THERE AND SO THE RESTAURANT IDEA WAS WAS REALLY WHERE WE LANDED, AND WE BROUGHT MIKE ONBOARD BEING A LOCAL PLANNER BEING INVOLVED DOWNTOWN. YOU KNOW HIS SKILLS AND HELPING US CRAFT PLANET THAT, YOU KNOW.

BITS AND WORKS IS WAS PART OF THE PART OF THE TEAM WAS MIKE HAS PREPARED A PRESENTATION TONIGHT. I THINK THERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT ARE ORIGINAL APPLICATION. UM YOU KNOW, REQUESTED THAT WE'VE, UH YOU KNOW, SINCE HER FROM THE PUBLIC ON IT, WE'RE HERE TO, YOU KNOW, TALK ABOUT AND FIND SOME COMMON GROUND AND WITHOUT FURTHER ADO, ALTERNATE OVER TO MIKE AND YOU KNOW, WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS. ONCE HE GETS THROUGH HIS, UM HIS, UH OKAY? GOOD EVENING. MEMBERS OF THE. INSURANCE CITY COUNCIL. PLEASURE TO BE HERE, MIKE MCCARTHY, MCCARTHY AND ASSOCIATES, LAND PLANNING AND DESIGN. OFFICE LOCATED 309 SOUTHEAST OSCEOLA STREET, SUITE ONE OF FOUR. HERE THIS EVENING TO TALK ABOUT 101 COLORADO AVENUE. HE. DID IN FACT FILE THE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO NOTIFICATION. OUT WITH THE MAIL OUTS STAFF INDICATED 33 MAIL OUTS WERE SENT OUT, UM, AS WELL AS THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON SITE. WHAT YOU HAVE HERE IS A VERY SMALL EXISTING HOUSE THAT WAS BUILT IN 1958. UH, THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. ON THE HOUSE WAS ROUGHLY 1200 SQUARE FEET. AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING,

[01:15:09]

AS FAR AS BUILDING IS 1500 SQUARE FEET, THE TOTAL OUTDOOR SEATING AREA. CALCULATES ROUGHLY JUST OVER 3000 SQUARE, BUT THE BUILDING ITSELF WERE INCREASING ABOUT 300 SQUARE FEET. SO WE'RE IN IN KEEPING THE SCALE AND THE SIZE. CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS DEVELOPED IN 1958. UM. THIS WAS DR SANDBOX HOME AS A CHILD. AND, UH, HIS MOTHER ALSO BELIEVE HAD A PRACTICE OUT OF THIS RESIDENCE . UM THE INTENT HERE IS TO CREATE A LEGACY PROJECT. NOT ONLY THAT BENEFITS THE CITY BUT ALSO FUTURE GENERATIONS OF HIS FAMILY AND TO KEEP THIS IN PERPETUITY. AH SO WE HAD SOME CHALLENGES WITH THIS SITE. OBVIOUSLY WHEN YOU'RE DEALING WITH THE URBAN FORM UM, WE CAN'T ADD LAND TO IT. SO WE'VE GOT A 50 WIDE LOT BEER. HOWEVER IT'S IDEALLY LOCATED RIGHT ON RIDGE IF YOU WILL. LOOK OVERLOOKING THE WIDE WATER OF THE ST LUCIE RIVER. UM WHICH HAS BEEN A PRIVATE PRIVATE PIECE OF PROPERTY PRIVATE VIEWS UNLESS YOU LIVE THERE. UH UM, PROPOSED USE WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, WHICH IS A PUBLIC BENEFIT. SERVES THE COMMUNITY ALLOW PEOPLE AND CITIZENS AND TRAVELERS TO COME AND ENJOY THIS BEAUTIFUL VIEW THAT THE CITY HAS TO OFFER. YOU'LL SEE HERE. THIS IS RENDERED PLAN SHOWING HOW WE'RE MAKING GREEN SPACES WORK WITHIN THE SITE. WE'RE ALSO PRESERVING A SIZABLE NOT EASY. SIZABLE. MANGO TREE RIGHT HERE, AS WELL AS ENHANCING SOME OF THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AROUND. THE WEST SIDE, AND WE'RE HAVING TO PUT SOME OTHER GREEN. GREENERY AROUND THE PERIMETER. YOU'LL SEE HERE THAT WE HAVE A SIDEWALK CONNECTION THAT COMES DOWN WITH SOME SWITCHBACKS THAT IS EXISTING. SO THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT GRADE CHANGE FROM THE END OF COLORADO. DOWN TO THE BOARDWALK BOARDWALK WAS JUST RECENTLY. COMPLETED IN THE LAST. WHAT 556 YEARS. SO TO SPEAK. IS IT 1010 NOW? 88 YEARS. MAYBE SO, UM THOSE CONNECTION POINTS. WE HAVE SOME CONNECTION POINTS TO EACH OF THE TERRACES. SO THESE ARE OUTDOOR DINING. AREAS IF YOU WILL, AND SO WE HAVE SOME CONNECTION POINTS THAT WILL TIE INTO THAT. PUBLIC ELEMENT THERE THE SIDEWALKS. UM. FROM THERE. I WILL MOVE TO SOME OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES. THESE ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE UP TO DATE THAN WHAT WAS PRESENTED IN STAFFS PRESENTATION. UM, YOU'LL SEE, THIS IS THIS IS LOOKING FROM THE WATER'S EDGE SOUTH. SO THIS IS COLORADO. THIS IS THE SWITCHBACK OF SIDEWALKS, YOU'LL SEE. THIS IS A ONE STORY RESTAURANT WITH COVERED OUTDOOR SEATING AGAIN IN KEEPING TO ITS CURRENT FORM. UM THIS PROPERTY AND WITHIN LOOK IS LOCATED WITHIN THE URBAN WATERFRONT AND FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE ITS MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT COULD BE UPWARDS OF 45 FT. SO WE COULD GO FOR STORIES HERE, BUT WE'RE NOT IN ONE STORY. UM. YOU SEE, WE HAVE SOME VARIOUS ELEMENTS OUTSIDE HARDSCAPE SOFT SKATE TERRACING. SOME GREEN SPACE. DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEXTURES. MATERIALS. CREATES A SENSE OF PLACE ON THE WATERFRONT. UM SOME COVERED AREA FOR THOSE SUMMER DAYS. AND WHEN THE SUN'S OUT, WE CAN GET IN SOME SHADE UP HERE. THIS IS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE OF THAT COVERED AREA AS WELL. AND THIS IS A VIEW FROM THE COVERED AREA LOOKING OUT ON THE WHITEWATER. UM SOMETHING THAT'S VERY UNIQUE, YOU KNOW, GOING BACK TO THIS WHEN YOU THINK HISTORICALLY OF SEMINAL STREET, SEMINOLE STREET IS HAS BEEN TREATED AS AN ALLEY FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME AND THROUGH THE C R, A BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS THAT FINAL SPEARHEADING, AND I HEARD SOME DISCUSSION EARLIER TODAY ON UH UM. YOU KNOW, WE'RE STARTING TO FACE THE WATER. IT'S GOT SEMINAL BLUFF. SOME OF THE OTHER THE RIVER HOUSE AND SO ON, AND SO FORTH. THOSE THREE DEVELOPMENTS THEY'RE NOW STARTING TO FACE WATER. UNFORTUNATELY, YOU'RE STILL PRIVATIZED. BUT WITH THIS, YOU ACTUALLY GET SOME PUBLIC ELEMENT HERE. PUBLICLY YOU CAN BUY A NICE T GET A GLASS OF WATER. YOU CAN COME AND SIT HERE AND ENJOY THE WATER. HERE'S A PERSPECTIVE OF THE ENTRY OFF OF US, SEMINOLE YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE A FOCAL FEATURE ON THE CORNER OF COLORADO AND SEMINAL AGAIN. THIS

[01:20:05]

WILL COME BACK, AS INDICATED, AS INDICATED BY STAFF TO THE CRB FOR THE PUBLIC ARTWORK. THIS IS KIND OF THE FORM IN WHICH WE ARE ENVISIONING FOR THIS CORNER. AND YOU'LL SEE SOME OF THE SCREENING THAT WE HAVE AROUND OUR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. AH! YOU KNOW, IT'S UNIQUE. IT'S ABOVE AND BEYOND THE MINIMUM OF CODE. HERE'S KIND OF A LAYOUT. SO THIS GIVES YOU A PERSPECTIVE OF THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. AND THIS IS SOME CEDING SOME INTERIOR SEATING. THIS THIS IS OUTDOOR BUT COVERED THEN. THE TERRORISTS IS DOWN TO THE OTHER AREAS. THIS BEING THE KITCHEN.

ELEMENT OF THE RESTAURANT. THIS IS GIVES YOU SOME ELEVATION PERSPECTIVE. SO HERE YOU CAN KIND OF SEE AS A SECTION. WHAT THESE TERRORISTS IS LOOK LIKE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE GREAT CHANGE. FROM YOU KNOW? SOUTH TO NORTH NORTH THINGS DOWN HERE WHERE THE WATER'S GOOD TO SEE YOU AGAIN. ONE STORY VERY LOW. IN KEEPING. WE TRIED TO REMAIN COGNIZANT OF HUMAN SCALE WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO. 234 STORY TOWERING BUILDING. UM, AND THE FACT YOU KNOW VIEWS OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS SOUTH SUCH AS THE END. GET THOSE ARE SOME MORE PERSPECTIVES. I WOULD LIKE TO KIND OF GO BACK A LITTLE BIT. AND TALK ABOUT PARKING, SO WE INITIALLY SUBMITTED THIS APPLICATION. WE SUBMITTED FOR PRE APPLICATION 2002. START WORKING ON THE PROJECT IN 2001, SO WE'RE OVER TWO YEARS IN ON THIS PROJECT. AH! THAT POINT TIME, KEV FREEMAN WAS THE DIRECTOR 2020 2020. DID I SAY. 2002 I'M SORRY, 2022. EXCUSE ME. APOLOGIZE CAN'T COUNT. SO. FAST FORWARD. HERE WE ARE, UM OUR INITIAL SUBMITTAL INDICATED, UH, UTILIZING VALET.

OKAY, SO. WE HAD OUR CRV MEETING. AND THAT WAS ON NOVEMBER. RIGHT HERE. NOVEMBER, 7TH. ALRIGHT AT THE CRV MEETING. WE HAD AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC INPUT. THAT HAD SOME CONCERNS WITH THIS PROJECT, SO WE WENT BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD. WE DECIDED TO HOLD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. WE INVITED ALL OF THE RESIDENTS ALONG SEMINOLE. AND NOTIFIED THEM THAT WE'VE BEEN HOLDING A MEETING. AND YOU HELD THE MEETING ON DECEMBER 13TH AS YOU SEE THERE, WHERE WE GAVE THE SAME PRESENTATION TRYING TO UNDERSTAND EVERYBODY'S CONCERNS. THERE WAS OVERWHELMING CONSENSUS. AFTER 45 MINUTES OF DISCUSSION AND OPEN DIALOGUE. THAT VALID. THE BALLET WAS THE ISSUE AND SO STAFF PRESENTED THAT IN IN THEIR PRESENTATION. AND THAT WAS OUR INITIAL PROPOSAL AT THAT POINT. GIVEN THE INPUT FROM THE NEIGHBORS. WE WENT BACK AND SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT? YOU DON'T WANT BALLET. WE DON'T WANT VALET, EITHER. WE HAD TO DEMONSTRATE A FORM OF COMPLIANCE TO PARKING. AND ENDED UP THAT THEY WERE FINE WITH NO VALET, AND SO WE'RE FINE WITH NO DOUBT. AND WE BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN COME WHEN YOU COME INTO DOWNTOWN STUART AND WHETHER YOU'RE GOING TO GO TO THE GAFFORD. OR YOU'RE GOING TO GO TO THE RIVER WALK. AND THEN MAYBE GET SOME ICE CREAM AND KILL ONES. PARK ORGANICALLY IN DOWNTOWN AND YOU FIND THE SPACE PARK YOU WALK. AND SO TO THINK THAT WE HAVE TO CREATE ALL OF THIS ADDITIONAL PARKING REALLY JUST ISN'T TRUE. THAT'S NOT HOW WE FUNCTION IN DOWNTOWN. THE ONLY WAY WE WALKED AWAY FROM THAT MEANING, AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE DID. WE CAME BACK TO THE CITY. AND THAT WAS STAFF MET WITH YOU. WE CHANGED OUR PROPOSAL ACCORDINGLY TO MEET THE NEIGHBORS NEEDS. YOU'RE CONCERNED, SO WE ARE NO LONGER PROPOSING VALET. UM AND WE ARE REQUESTING AN EXEMPTION TO THE PARTNER. UM. I WILL SAY THAT WE DO HAVE MULTIPLE LETTERS OF SUPPORT. HERE'S ONE OF THEM.

THIS IS FROM THE STEWART MAINSTREAM, PRESENTED THE STUART MAIN STREET. AND WE RECEIVED A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM THEM. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO NOTE THAT ALL OF THESE ARE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY OF STEWART'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ALL RIGHT. THERE ARE 23. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. THIS PROJECT SATISFIES URBAN INFILL REDEVELOPMENT. CREATION. OF

[01:25:03]

PUBLIC ACCESS TO WATERFRONT I COULD GO ON AND ON BOTTOM LINE IS ALL THIS TEXT. THERE ARE 23 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES THAT THIS PROPOSAL. SATISFIES. WITH THAT. I'M I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE I ALSO HAVE OUR ARCHITECT HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ARCHITECT ARCHITECTURE, WE HAVE ACROSS THE BOARD. IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE URBAN WATERFRONT. MISSPENT A TWO YEAR PROCESS WERE EXCITED FOR THIS PROJECT TO GET APPROVAL AND BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD. THINK IT WILL BE A GREAT COMPONENT. THE VITALITY AND IN OUR DOWNTOWN AND REALLY ALLOW PEOPLE TO COME AND SEE WHAT STEWART'S ABOUT OUR WATERFRONT. UM, WITH THAT. I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE DR SAM BACK. HE'S HERE, ALONG WITH HIS FAMILY. LET HIM SPEAK. A COUPLE WORDS. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOLLOWING I'M HERE. THANK YOU. WELCOME, SIR.

THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME. UM SO I BROUGHT MY FAMILY HERE, UM, AGAIN HAVE GROWN UP IN COUNTY.

GRADUATED. AS WE DISCUSSED IN 1993. UM AND THIS. THIS PROBABLY HAS BEEN WITH MY FAMILY SINCE 1988. PUT THE BRAKES SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NOT CUT THE LAWN. I'VE SHOULDN'T HEDGES UM AND, UH, YOU KNOW, SO IT HAS THIS PROPERTY MEANS A LOT. I'VE SEEN FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS ON THE LAW. SO IT'S A FANTASTIC PROPERTY. YOU KNOW MY KIDS, WE'VE GONE UP. AND SO YOU KNOW, WHEN NICK AND I STARTED TALKING ABOUT PUTTING THIS PROJECT TOGETHER AND I PURCHASE PROPERTY FROM A FAMILY FROM MY MOM. UM WE HAD A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT OPTIONS. YOU KNOW, I LIKE THE RESTAURANT. I IDEA THE BEST. BUT I DIDN'T WANT TO SEE ANOTHER FOUR STORY BUILDING GO UP. AND I THOUGHT THAT THE PUBLIC WOULD WOULD ENJOY A RESTAURANT. I WOULD ENJOY A RESTAURANT. SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT MOVING FORWARD. IT'S BEEN TWO YEARS AND EXCITED ABOUT GETTING THIS MOVING FORWARD AND APPRECIATE TIME. SHIP PART I HAVE A LOT, BUT I JUST WANT TO I ASKED THEM SO THAT YOU KNOW, THE PUBLIC KNOWS WHAT WE USE WHEN WE DELIBERATE AND TALK ABOUT THESE THINGS, SO THEY'RE PROBABLY GOING TO BE ALL OVER THE ALL OVER THE PLACE. UM, FIRST JUSTIN LOOKING AT THIS PROJECT ON A GENERAL BASIS. IT WOULD BE WHAT WE CONSIDER AH! BECAUSE THE PLANNER'S DREAM OR PLANNER'S NIGHTMARE, WE'RE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR URBAN IN FILL. WE'RE ALWAYS LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO. BUT THEN YOU LOOK AT THINGS LIKE PARKING AND ACCESS AND LOCATION.

AND SO THERE ARE LOTS OF THINGS TO CONSIDER, UH, WITH THIS PROJECT. SO MY, UM AH! TWO BIG THINGS IS. GOING FROM URBAN WATERFRONT URBAN P U D, WHICH ALLOWS US TO PUT SOME REQUIREMENTS ON THEM. MAYBE POSSIBLY GET THAT LAND FOR THE, UM YOU SHOWED THAT THAT THING WITH THE PROPERTY IS ON THE NORTH SIDE THAT GAVE THE BROAD WALK AREA AND THAT THAT WOULD BE A PART OF THE ACQUISITION OF A PLAN. TO CONTINUE A BOARDWALK, MAYBE ALL THE WAY TO THE HOSPITAL OR AS FAR AS WE CAN GO ON DOWN TO MR GEARS, PROPERTY OR SOMEWHERE IN THAT AIR WHEREVER WE ARE ALONG, UM, SEMINAL STREET AREA TO HELP WITH OUR PLANS THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE. FOR THAT AREA. BUT SO THE IDEA IS UH, WHAT'S IN THERE? AND I WANTED YOU IF YOU DON'T. MAYBE WHEN YOU FIND IT AND IT MIGHT IT IT PROBABLY IT WASN'T YOUR REPORT. BUT IF YOU COULD JUST LIST FOR THE PUBLIC WHAT ARE THE ACTUAL USES? THAT CAN HAPPEN ON THIS 0.23 ACRES ON THE URBAN WATERFRONT? AND THEN, OF COURSE, API UD WOULD BE RESTRICTED IF IT WERE EVER APPROVED. TO WHATEVER IT IS THAT WE'RE TELLING THEM THIS TIME FRAME APPROVAL SCHEDULE AS WELL AS WHATEVER IT IS THAT THEY AND US AGREED TO DO ON THAT PROPERTY UNDER THE P U D AGREEMENT, SO THAT WOULD BE THE P U D BUT ON THE URBAN WATERFRONT ON THE 0.23 ACRE PROPERTY THAT WAS USED FOR, UM

[01:30:04]

OFFICE BUILDING AND A RESIDENCE IN THE PAST. WHAT ARE SOME OF THE USES THAT CAN OCCUR ON THAT? UM DO YOU HAVE THAT WITH YOU NOW, JODI. IF YOU COULD JUST LIST THOSE USES THEY CAN BE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL. RECREATIONAL LODGING, PUBLIC FACILITIES IN CONSERVATION IN A MIXED DEVELOPMENT, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. OKAY ALRIGHT, SO THAT'S ONE THING THE USES AN AND IF THEY WERE TO BE DEVELOPED AND MEET WHATEVER REQUIREMENTS, ONE OF THE BIG REQUIREMENTS WOULD ALWAYS BE PARKING. AND DO WE WANT TO PUT PEOPLE IN FLAT PARKING AND OTHER THINGS? NOW YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THE 500 FT. AND I WASN'T SURE ABOUT THAT.

BUT I JUST WANT TO ASK THIS QUESTION. UM WHEN THE CREEK SIDE WAS A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TO THE OTHER BUILDINGS THAT WERE PART OF AN EXISTING P U D, WHERE THEY COULD GET THAT PARKING EXCHANGE WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT ON THE OTHER SIDE. IN THIS INSTANCE THERE WAS SOME TALK ABOUT IF THERE WAS BALLET. MAYBE THERE COULD BE THE IDEA OF PARKING DOWN. AH I GUESS IT'S PROBABLY THE BUILDING WERE LISA BAZZAZ OFFICES OR SOME MEDICAL BUILDING WAS MENTIONED ON THERE. AND I'M NOT SURE IF ANYBODY IF, IF EVER THAT WOULD COULD BE ALLOWED UNDER OUR CODE IF THERE WAS AN IDEA OF THEM MAKING AN ARRANGEMENT TO HAVE SOMETHING IF THEY STILL HAD TO PROVIDE FOR FLAT PARKING, JUST BRINGING THAT UP. THE OTHER THING IS THAT AGAIN, PARKING IS ALWAYS THE BIG THING. AND SO THEY HAVE COME AND SAID, LET'S BE LIKE THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE IN THE OLD HISTORIC AREA AND THOSE WHO WERE APPROVED JUST NORTH OF THAT AREA FOR PARKING EXAM AND LET PEOPLE PARK WHETHER IT'S A QANTAS PARKER AT THE COURTHOUSE OR LONGEST SOCIAL BOULEVARD AND FIND THEIR WAY TO THE RESTAURANT. IF THERE WERE APPROVED FOR THAT. SO THAT'S WITH WITH IT. I WANTED TO CONFIRM IF THE STAFF REPORT AND WHAT THE DEVELOPERS SAYING WITH REGARD TO DO YOU STILL NEED TO HAVE VALET AT NIGHT. IF THIS DEVELOPMENT WE'RE GOING TO BE IN THE YOU STILL NEED TO HAVE VALET, OR IS IT COMPLETELY OPEN AND PEOPLE JUST GET IN? OR VALET WOULD BE ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT YOU YOU DO AND HAVE PEOPLE RUN AROUND THE BLOCK ON THIS 2 TO 1 WAY, PIERS. WOULD YOU STILL NEED VALET PARK IN WE ARE NOT PROPOSING VALET AT THIS POINT.

OKAY ALRIGHT. SO THAT'S JUST HOW THE I'M JUST TRYING TO DISTINGUISH WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STAFF REPORT. SO IF WE HAVE PARKING EXEMPT AND, UM. THEY'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE THEIR THEIR, UM HANDICAPPED PARKING ON SITE. YES THEY DO HAVE ONE PARKING ON SITE FOR HANDICAPPED, OKAY? AND, UM AH! WE ALSO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE DEVELOPED ALONG. UH, SEMINOLES. WE HAVE THOSE CONDOS.

I THINK SOMEBODY MENTIONED THAT RECENTLY. UM. THOSE PEOPLE. I THINK THEY PROVIDED THEIR OWN PARKING AT THOSE CONDOS. MY THING IS WHATEVER WE DECIDE TO DO AS A COMMISSIONER, I KNOW THAT THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS ARE GOING TO BE GIVEN THEIR INPUT. WE HAVE TO DECIDE IF WE AGREE WITH THIS PROJECT IN TERMS OF THIS EXEMPTION FOR PARKING ALL WE GONNA GO WITH DEVELOPMENTS, WHETHER IN THIS AREA OR IN AREAS THAT DID NOT HAVE PARKING EXEMPT IN THE DOWNTOWN. ARE WE GONNA GO ON AN INCREMENTAL BASIS, AND EACH TIME SOMEBODY COMES IN, WE DO SOMETHING, WHETHER WE ARE FOR OR AGAINST OR DO WE NEED TO COME UP WITH SOME KIND OF A PLAN TO DECIDE HOW WE'RE GOING TO TRANSITION? AND OF COURSE, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DO KNOW WHICH IT MIGHT COME TO IF WE HAVE THAT SATURATION LEVEL IS HOW CLOSE WOULD WE HAVE A PARKING GARAGE? I KNOW THAT WE'RE SUGGESTING A PARKING GARAGE IN THE VICINITY OF A PROPOSED, UM, BRIGHT LINE STATION IF THAT EVER CAME TO FRUITION, BUT THE IDEA IS THAT I LIKE HAVING THINGS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY, AND I LIKE HAVING INFILL DEVELOPMENT. BUT I KNOW THAT SOMETIMES AND I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOUR MARKETING TECHNIQUES. IF PEOPLE WOULD SAY WELL, IF IT IF THERE'S NO PARKING AVAILABLE DOWNTOWN, MAYBE I WON'T GO TO THIS RESTAURANT. I WON'T GO TO THAT PLACE. WE HAVEN'T SEEN THAT PATTERN IN DOWNTOWN. WE STILL SEE PEOPLE COMING TO ALL THE PLACES AND EVERYBODY GETS EQUAL PLAY IN THEIR BUSINESS OR WHEN THERE'S A FEAR OF FESTIVAL, BUT WE STILL DO HAVE A PARKING CRUNCH IN OUR DOWNTOWN AREA. UM IF THERE'S NOTHING WITH THE VALET, THEN THAT'S PROBABLY

[01:35:01]

FINE. THE OTHER THING I WANTED TO ASK YOU AND YOU MENTIONED THE ARCHITECT WAS AND I DIDN'T. I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE I DIDN'T READ IT OR SEE IT. BUT IN THE OUTLINE FOR THE ROOFING DO YOU HAVE LIKE, UM COUPLE OF DIFFERENT HEIGHTS, WHERE THE ROOFING IS NOT ULTIMATELY FLAT ROOF. IT HAS A PATTERN TO IT THAT TELL ME WHAT THE HEIGHTS ARE WHEN YOU CHANGE LEVELS IN IN YOUR IN YOUR ROOF PATTERN. GOOD EVENING, BRENTWOOD. UM, THE ARCHITECT FOR THE PROJECT. UM, SO IT'S AN EXISTING RESIDENTS EXISTING THE ONLY NEW ROOF THAT WE'VE ADDED IS ON THE BOTTOM VIEW THERE TO THE RIGHT HAND SIDE IS THE COVER DIET THAT IS THE ONLY NEW ROOF AND IT STEPS UP FROM THE EXISTING RESIDENTS JUST ENOUGH TO ALLOW ROOM FOR THE NEW STRUCTURE THAT SUPPORTS IT. SO MAYBE A COUPLE OF FEET SO YOU'RE JUST GONNA HAVE IS IT A FLAT ROOF NOW, OR EVE'S GABLE ROOF, BUT IT'S A SHALLOW GABLE. OKAY? MOST OF THE OLD STUART HOLMES HAD A VERY SHALLOW PITS ON OKAY.

AND I DON'T KNOW. I DIDN'T LOOK AT THE HISTORIC UM IDEAS AND I DIDN'T TALK TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY ABOUT, UH, ANYTHING LIKE THAT. BUT MAYBE IF THERE'S SOMETHING IF IT WERE EVER APPROVED TONIGHT THAT THERE COULD BE SOMETHING BUILT INTO IT TO AT LEAST CREATE OUR RE VITALIZED SOME HISTORIC FEATURE IN AND IN KEEPING WITH PROBABLY SOME OF THOSE HOMES ACROSS THE STREET. I KNOW THAT SOME OF THOSE ARE LIKE THE CLIFTON'S HOUSE HAS LIKE LITTLE IN STORY INSIDE, AND THEY HAVE DIFFERENT LITTLE ROOMS THAT CREATE THE WINDOWS AND THE YOU KNOW, JUST TO HAVE A LOOK. SO IT'S NOT. SO I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE EXISTING HOUSE IS VERY SMALL AND MOST OF THE INTERIOR SPACE BECOMES KITCHEN OR BATHROOM. AND YOU'RE GONNA BUILD SOME SOME NEW SPACE, THOUGH NOT NOT ENCLOSED. WE'RE ADDING ON 200 SQUARE FEET, THAT'S ALL ALL FOR SERVICE NEEDS FOR THE RESTAURANT. REALLY TOUGH , UH, PROGRAM TO FIT INTO THE SMALL RESIDENTS. SO WHAT WE ARE DOING IS YOU KNOW WE'RE WORKING WITH THE EXISTING HOUSE, BUT THE COVERED DINING TERRORISTS. IT'S EXPOSED STRUCTURE, SO WE ARE ADDING INTEREST THROUGH THE FRAMING MEMBERS THAT IT'S KIND OF A BEAUTIFUL LOOK AS OPPOSED TO GROUP TRUST IS WE HAVE A FLAT CEILING WITH SOME TREATMENT AND THIS WILL BE THIS WILL HAVE SOME INTEREST AND THAT WAS AS MUCH AS WE COULD OFFER AS WELL AS ADDING SOME. I THINK, WRITING SOME STONE CLADDING ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE HOUSE WHERE WE COULD JUST WE DIDN'T WANNA. WE WANT IT TO BE ELEGANT, SO WE DON'T OVERWHELM IT BECAUSE IT'S AGAIN. IT'S A SMALL STRUCTURE. SO WE HAD A HINT HERE AND HIT THERE.

OKAY SO LONG AS THE STRUCTURE CARE, LIFT UP MR TROUGH, AND I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, MR MCCARTHY. SORRY, NICK SHROVE FOR THE RECORD, UM THE PUBLIC RTC TODAY HAS NOT. THAT'S NOT THE END GAME PUBLIC GUARD AND I KNOW THAT THE CRV LEVEL THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT PUBLIC GARDEN, THE CITY BEING MORE THAN SELFISH STATUES. SO, UM YEAH, COMMISSIONER PARK. YOUR POINT'S WELL TAKEN, AND I THINK WE CAN YOU KNOW? FIND A WAY TO INCORPORATE SOMETHING INTO THAT PUBLIC GUARD. UM AS AS JUST ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT MIGHT, YOU KNOW, DRAW SOME HISTORY AND THE GOAL OF THE PROJECT WAS TO KEEP THE ACQUAINTANCE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND YOU KNOW TO WHATEVER EFFECT WE CAN DO THAT WITH FINISHES. AND STUFF. YOU KNOW THAT. THE OUTSIDE IS BEING PRESENTED TO YOU TODAY. THE CONCEPT WILL COME WITH TIME. AND YOU KNOW WHAT? I THINK WE'D BE FOOLISH NOT TO INCLUDE YOU KNOW SOMETHING IN THAT? YOU KNOW INSIDE THAT INCLUDES A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY OF SKILLS. THANK YOU. MR MCCARTHY MAY CONTINUE, MADAM MAYOR. SO UM, RIGHT BEHIND THAT PROPOSED PUBLIC ART, THE DRIVEWAY. I THINK WHAT I MET WITH YOU ASK YOU HOW MANY, UM, YOU KNOW WHETHER IT'S YOU HAVE THE FIRE TRUCK SHOWING HOW A PARKING SPACE LOOKS. BUT WHEN YOU HAVE A GARBAGE TRUCK OR A BUDWEISER BEER OR EARNEST AND PRODUCE WHATEVER THAT TRUCK IS THAT DELIVERY VEHICLE. BECAUSE THEY HOLD UP TRAFFIC NOW ON FLAGLER AND OSCEOLA AND EVERY OTHER PLACE THAT HAS TO DELIVER TO A DOWNTOWN BUSINESS. HOW DOES IT LOOK ON THAT DRIVEWAY WHEN YOU HAVE TO COME IN FROM COLORADO AND GO BACK UP THROUGH SEMINOLE TO HOLD A DELIVERY TRUCKS? SO WE THANK YOU, MIKE MCCARTHY FOR THE RECORD. SO WE HAD TO DO AN AUTO TURN. UM MOVEMENT THROUGH HERE. WITH WITH TRUCKS. UM. BOTH FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. WHICH ARE I THINK THEY'RE LIKE 48 OR SOMETHING. REMEMBER CORRECTLY, UM AND THEY DID THEY DO WORK ON THIS. ON THIS RADIUS HERE. AND THEN THE FIRE TRUCK, LIKE LIKE SHOWN HERE ON THIS EXHIBIT. SITS OUT HERE. SO YES, WE DO. WE DO ADEQUATELY PROVIDE FOR CIRCULATION OF THOSE TYPES OF VEHICLES WHEN SOMETHING IS TURNING INTO INTO THAT BUILDING, THEY'RE NOT STICKING

[01:40:05]

OUT ON SEMINOLE ITSELF. UM TRYING TO TURN BECAUSE YOU HAVE THAT PARKING SPACE. IT'S GOING TO BE ELIMINATED THAT WILL GIVE YOU ENOUGH ROOM TO GET IN THERE AND STACK SO THAT SOMETHING IS NOT, UM HANGING OUT ON SEMINAL, CORRECT? YES, MA'AM. OKAY? UM MISS NOISE AND MUSIC, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR AND LIGHTS. SO I BELIEVE THE CRB HAD TACKED ON A RECOMMENDATION OF NO OUTDOOR MUSIC. UM WE? WE REALLY DON'T WANT THAT CONDITION. WE BELIEVE THAT JUST THIS NORMAL CITY NOISE ORDINANCE SHOULD BE APPLICABLE. WE'D LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE ABLE TO HAVE OUTDOOR GUY PLAYING. ENTIRE ACOUSTIC GUITAR OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, OR PERHAPS, YOU KNOW, MAYBE A FIVE PIECE BAND. I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE CERTAINLY SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF NOISE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF STEWART. AH, UM AS FAR AS LIGHTING GOES, UM WE HAD TO PROVIDE PHOTO METRICS. AND SO YOU KNOW, LIGHTING CANNOT SPILL ONTO ADJACENT SITES. IN KEEPING THE BUILDING ONE STORY THAT THAT'S MINIMIZED. ALSO WITH OUR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AS WELL, THAT YOU MENTIONED THE LANDSCAPE, BUT FOR SO IF YOU HAVE COLOSSI IS COMING TO THE SOUTH ALONG, SEMINAL WHERE THE RIGHT THERE WHERE THAT OTHER CIRCLE IS. YEAH, SO THOSE WOULD BE ABOUT, UM, THEY WOULD GET UP TO 6 FT OR SO 6 TO 8. OKAY YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVE A DOOR SPECIES, THE SPECIES THAT ARE THERE ON SITE THOSE KALUSHA THEY'RE THEY'RE ALMOST 80. OKAY? AND I WAS MUSICAL AND THE BOARD WORK OR IF WE GIVE YOU THAT REQUIREMENT TO GIVE US THE PROPERTY FOR THE BROADWATER, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE INCLUDING AN AGREEING TO CORRECT . YES, MA'AM. WE'RE WILLING TO PROVIDE THE RIPARIAN RIGHTS FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE BOARDWALK.

UM, ACROSS, YOU KNOW. WHAT WOULD BE THIS PROPERTY IS REPAIRING RIGHTS, HOWEVER. AH! RESERVING THE RIGHT TO EXTEND A DOCK FOR THIS PROPERTY AS WELL. POSSIBLY SO. WOLF WILL WORK OUT THAT LANGUAGE. BELIEVE WE DISCUSSED THAT WITH THE CITY MANAGER AT SOME POINT. AND THEN BETWEEN THE STAFF REPORT IN YOUR REPORT. OR MAYBE OUR CONVERSATION. IS IT 150 OR 151 AS THE PROPOSED CAPACITY 151 50. UH IF I WAS IRVING MAYOR, IF I CAN THINK OF SOMETHING ELSE COMMISSIONER MCDONALD'S THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UH SINCE WE'VE GOT THE SCREEN UP HERE, SO IN THE INITIAL APPLICATION. YOU HAD THE TRAFFIC. UH COMING IN FROM COLORADO EXITING ON THE SEMINAL BUT NOW WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING IS THE ANY THE ANY TRAFFIC DRIVING THROUGH AND ENTER FROM SEMINAL AND EXIT ON COLORADO'S THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT, SIR. WOULD WOULD THE. WOULD THE, UH UM GARBAGE TRUCK BE ENTERING THE SAME WAY OR THE GARBAGE TRUCK HAVE TO GO. THE OTHER WAY TO GET THE GARBAGE TRUCK WOULD ENTER OFF OF COLORADO AND TURN INTO IT. IT'S COMMONPLACE BECAUSE IT'S SO YEAH, BUT MY QUESTION IS WHEN THERE'S A CAR PARKED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF COLORADO, WHO WILL STILL BUILD TO MAKE THE TURN IN ONE OF THOSE PARKING SPACES THERE. AND THE OTHER ON THE NORTH, AND THE WOULD BE ACTUALLY THE WEST SIDE OF COLORADO. CAUSE COLORADO RUNS NORTH AND SOUTH SO YES, YES, THOSE TURNING RADIUS IS DO WORK. THOSE THEY DO WORK. YES, OKAY. YEAH, RIGHT THERE.

THOSE IF THERE'S CARS PARKED THERE, THE GARBAGE TRUCK WILL BE ABLE TO OKAY, MAKE IT INTO THE TURN NOW, ARE YOU GONNA HAVE SIGNAGE THERE SO THAT BECAUSE ONE OF CORRECT YES, YES. OKAY SO YOU'RE GONNA HAVE DECIDED THERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS JUST COUPLE OF CONDITIONS. UM IF I WERE TO VOTE FOR THIS, IT WOULD BE A COUPLE OF CONDITIONS I WOULD NEED ONE IS AN ABSOLUTE CONDITION OF NO BALLET. HMM. UM BECAUSE WE'VE CERTAINLY HEARD FROM THE NEIGHBORS ON THAT. MHM ALSO, UH, REGARDING DISREGARDING THE, UH PARKING AT SEA. NO VALET . LET'S SEE WHAT ELSE HERE LIMITING THE NUMBER OF SEATS 250. HMM. LIMITING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO I THINK THE PROPOSED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WAS IT, 1500. I BELIEVE SO I'D HAVE TO REFER WHATEVER THE EXACT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS ALSO THAT THE COVERED AREA THAT'S NOT PART OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE JUST TO COVER DEREK DOES NOT GETTING CLOSED. BECAUSE THEY'RE SEEING IT INCLUDES I'VE SEEN OTHER RESTAURANTS COME

[01:45:06]

ALONG, AND LATER ON, THEY COME IN, AND THEY ENCLOSE IT. NOW THEY DOUBLE FOR POOR WEATHER SHOW. YEAH I'M NOT. I'M TALKING ABOUT A PERMIT STRONG, NOT TALKING ABOUT. UH KNOW, LIKE PLASTIC. COVERS I'M TALKING ABOUT ENCLOSING IT WITH WALLS AND WINDOWS, RIGHT CREATING UNDER AIR. YEAH, SOMETHING UNDER AIR. UNDERSTOOD? YEAH. SO UM. ALSO FROM, UM. WE'LL HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THE MUSIC, BUT I THINK THAT IF THERE IF WE WERE TO ALLOW MUSIC, LOVE LIVE MUSIC THAT WE HAVE A CUT OFF TIME OF LIKE 10. PM FOR THE LIVE MUSIC, THE STANDARD NOISE ORDINANCE, SO I AM RIGHT AND PM 10. PM SO PM UNTIL 10 A.M. TO KEEP IT GOING ALL NIGHT. UM LET'S SEE BACKSTABBER SEATS. UH WHAT ABOUT HOURS OF OPERATION DO ANY BEING LIKE A LIMITING HOURS TILL LIKE MIDNIGHT OR I, YOU KNOW, I THINK 11 TRY TO KEEP AWAY FROM MOST OF THE RESTAURANTS CLOSING DOWNTOWN BY MIDNIGHT ANYWAY, SO, BUT I THINK THAT WAY IT KEEPS THAT NIGHTCLUB THAT 24 HOUR OPERATION ELIMINATES THAT NIGHTCLUB ATMOSPHERE. I DON'T THINK SO, UM WE DON'T HAVE AN OPERATOR RIGHT NOW, AS OF YET, OKAY. BUT I WOULD ANTICIPATE THIS WOULD BE AN EVENING. FINE DINING. YOU KNOW, THERE'S NO BUSINESS AFTER CERTAIN HOURS. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO KEEP STAFF ON PAYROLL. SO YEAH, AND THEN ON REGARDING THE REGARDING THE PARKING EXEMPT AND WE HAD TALKED ABOUT THAT QUITE A BIT TODAY WHEN WE SPOKE, AND, UH AFTER AFTER GIVING A LOT OF THOUGHT, I THINK, UM I THINK MAINTAINING IT WITHIN THE P U D IS FINE, SO, BUT IT HAS TO BE A CONDITION TO THE P U D. UM AND I THINK AND TIED TO THIS USE THIS RESTAURANT USE. UM THEN, FINALLY , A CONDITION. UH AND MAYBE I THINK EVEN A DEED RESTRICTION LIMITING TO ONE STORY, SO THOSE ARE JUST SOME OF THE CONDITIONS TO LET YOU GUYS CHEW ON WHILE WHILE THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS ARE TALKING, BUT THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT I THINK I NEED TO SEE AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE PD. SO WE'RE OKAY WITH ALL OF THOSE WITH WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE DEED RESTRICTION. ZONING AGREEMENT IN THIS B U. D S BINDING. I MEAN, YOU GUYS CAN SHUT US DOWN. THERE'S NO NEED TO RESTRICT THE DEED FOR FUTURE. I BELIEVE THAT'S AN OVERREACH RESPECTFULLY. BUT CERTAINLY ALL THE OTHERS. I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THOSE. SORRY AND MAKE SURE IT FOR THE RECORD, I BELIEVE IT BECOMES A CONDITION OF THE P U. G. IN WHAT WE'RE PRESENTING HERE THAT UNDER THIS P U D THE STRUCTURE REMAINED ONE STORY, BUT IF IT WOULD, YOU KNOW , PLEASED THE COMMISSION. WE COULD ADD A SPECIFIC CONDITION THAT THIS P U. D. BY NATURE OF THE P U. D IS RESTRICTING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING TO ONE ONE STORY. AND THEN ANYTHING. YOU KNOW, 100 YEARS FROM NOW THAT NEEDS TO CHANGE THAT WOULD IN THEORY, BE AN AMENDMENT TO THE BEAUTY AND NOT INVESTING ANY RIGHTS UNDER YOU KNOW, AN INTERPRETATION THAT THE DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT CODE ALLOWS 45 FT AND FOUR STORIES AND NOW WE'RE TRYING TO COMBINE THIS TO YOU KNOW THESE TWO THINGS TO MAKE THE SANDWICH AND DON'T ASK THE YEAR. MR CITY ATTORNEY OR THE CITY MANAGER TO, YOU KNOW, COMMENT FURTHER ON HOW YOU KNOW WHAT WOULD MAYBE YOU'RE EXACTLY LOOKING FOR THEIR COMMISSIONER MCDONALD. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER RICH WOULD YOU LIKE IT? ONE OF THE PRIORITIES. THE CITY IS. TOO MAINTAIN THE PUBLIC'S ACCESS TO THE WATER, AND THAT'S NOT ONLY THE PHYSICAL ACCESS, BUT IT'S THE VISUAL ACCESS. SO AS YOU WALKED ON COLORADO AND THAT'S WHY THIS PROJECT IS SO APPEALING. AS YOU POINT OUT, IT'S ACTUALLY A CUTE LITTLE PIECE OF PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THE GRADE AND THE CUT BACK THERE. AND IT'S NICE THAT YOU TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT PEOPLE HAVE WALKED THERE. IT'S NICE TO ACCESS, UM, TO ACCESS THE BOARDWALK. CERTAINLY WE'RE GOING TO NEED THAT REPAIRING RIGHT? THAT'S MEN'S VALUE TO THE CITY AND TO THE PUBLIC. THE, UH COMMISSIONER MCDONALD MAKE SOME GOOD COMMENTS. I THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD, AND BECAUSE PARKING IS SUCH A CONCERN IS AND YOU ORIGINALLY AGREED TO PROVIDE 46 SELF PARKING SPACES, CORRECT. IT WAS BALLET. NO IT WAS 46 SELF PARKING AND SEVENTIES SOMETHING THAT ADDITIONAL VALET THEY WERE ALL BALLET. OKAY, THAT'S. BUT I

[01:50:04]

WOULD LIKE TO SEE YOU STILL HAVE TO LEASE THOSE 46 SPACES. BUT JUST MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC. JUSTIN QUICK, COMPLETE, INCREASING THE CAPACITY OF DOWNTOWN PARKING, ONE OF THE THINGS WE'RE TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO BE WILLING TO WALK TWO BLOCKS. TO DRIVE A LITTLE BIT TOWARDS WELLS FARGO PARK THEIR CAR. THERE'S PLENTY OF PARKING THERE. AND THIS OPERATING AS A PUBLIC LOT WOULD BE OF TERRIFIC VALUE. SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO RUN BALLETS PAY FOR VALET IS BUT I WOULD STILL LIKE YOU TO SEE LEAST THOSE AND MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.

ALRIGHT. I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO, AND I DO AGREE WITH IT, HOWEVER RESPECTFULLY, IT'S NOT APPROPRIATE FOR A PRIVATE ENTITY TO GO SECURE PARKING. UNDER LEASE, WHICH WE WOULD THEN BE LIABLE FOR TWO THEN GIVE IT TO THE CITY. FOR PUBLIC USE. THE APPROPRIATE THING IS FOR YOU TO INSTRUCT STAFF TO SAY, GO SECURE THAT PARKING UNDER A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. AND YOU CAN GHOST PUT SIGNAGE UP AND SAY PUBLIC COLLEGE PUBLIC PARKING.

YOU CAN LEASE IT FROM THOSE PRIVATE ENTITIES WAS NOT APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATE FOR US.

WE'RE NOT ENOUGH POSITION TO DO THAT. DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT ON THAT? LEAGUE OR THAT DOES EXPOSE THEM. WE HAVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, WHICH PROTECTS US. I AND MAYBE A HAPPY MEDIUM WAS THAT THEY STILL LEASED THE PARKING AND MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO THEIR CLIENTELE OR PAY THE CITY TO COST THE LEAST. FOR THAT. OKAY? HMM THIS IS THE FIRST HEARING SO WE CAN EXPLORE WHAT OPTIONS MAY BE AVAILABLE THERE. THOSE ARE MY ONLY COMMENTS. THANK YOU, MADAM. THERE.

PROVINCE. I WOULD LIKE TO RESERVE MINE UNTIL AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT. LOOKING HERE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. ALL RIGHT BEFORE YOU GO TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. CAN I ASK UM, I THINK IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN IN HERE IF THEY IF THEY HAD TO PROVIDE THOSE PARKING SPACES. IS IT THE 46 OR IS IT MORE? IF THEY HAD TO PROVIDE ACTUAL PARKING. WHAT WAS THAT NUMBER WAS 46. THEY WERE GOING TO PROVIDE 72. OKAY, SO THEY TRY TO DO DOUBLE ALRIGHT, FINE. THANK YOU. I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM THANK YOU. MR COLLINS IS GOING TO HOLD AND I WILL HOLD MY COMMENTS ALSO. SO WE WILL, UH.

NOW HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC. WE HAVE. MANY MANY PEOPLE HERE TO SPEAK TODAY, SO I'LL START WITH DENNIS STILLMAN. MR STILLMAN. THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU, MADAM. CHAIR COMMISSIONERS SKILLMAN, MY WIFE AND I UM, RESIDE AT 101 SOUTHEAST SEVEN OR PROPERTY THAT'S BEEN IN MY FAMILY SINCE 1939. AND IT HAS NEVER BEEN A SERVICE ALLEY DESPITE WHAT MR MCCARTHY SAYS. I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THIS PROPOSAL TO BE CONSIDERED FROM THE REQUESTER HAS YET TO STATE WHAT SORT OF RESTAURANT HE IS PROPOSING. HE STATES WILL BE HIGH END BUT WHAT'S THAT THEME THE STUART REALLY NEED ANOTHER HIGH END RESTAURANT, ESPECIALLY AFTER THE LOSS OF THE HUNGER, THE PELICAN AND MULLIGANS. ARE WE GETTING A HIGH END MICKEY D'S ANOTHER WATERFRONT OR A HIGH END HOOTERS? WE DON'T KNOW. COULD WE BE BACK? ACTUALLY, COULD WE BE REACHING A POINT? WITH THE PROLIFERATION OF RESTAURANTS. WILL BECOME A DETRIMENT TO ALL. THE 150 SEATS MENTIONED SEEMS TO BE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING THE POOR COPS SRX OR SFX. SOME LIGHTS THIS RELATIONS REQUIRES 51% OF REVENUE BE DERIVED FROM FOOD SALES. I FIND THIS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY GIVEN THE 50 BY 130 FT SIZE OF THE PROPERTY. IN FACT, THE PROVIDED ARTIST SKETCH WITH PEOPLE GIVEN AT THE MEETING THAT WAS REFERENCED SHOWED ONLY 93 SEATS. WELL, THIS REQUIREMENT BE MONITORED AND ENFORCED. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE REQUESTER HAS REVISED THE PLAN TO USE THE PARKING LOT ON THE LEFT IN OSCEOLA. VALET PARKING. WHAT ALTERNATIVE IS HE PROPOSING? WHAT IS YOUR INCE'S? DO WE HAVE THAT THIS ISSUE WILL NOT BE RAISED IN THE FUTURE.

[01:55:07]

THIS DOES NOT DOES NOTHING TO MITIGATE THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC ALONG SEVEN OLD STREET. SEMINAL SAFE STREET IS ALREADY A PARKING LOT FOR EXISTING RESTAURANT STAFF. WITH NO ENFORCEMENT OF THE THREE HOUR WOMEN. THE REQUESTER IS ASKING FOR THE REPEAL ALL ORDINANCES. IN CONFLICT WITH HIS PLANS. THIS IS ABSURD. WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? WHAT ARE HIS PLANS? WELL THIS REPEAL APPLIED TO CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES. DOES IT INCLUDE THE REPEAL OF THE NOISE ORDINANCE? WHAT DOES STEWART GET FOR THESE CONSIDERATIONS? WHAT PRESIDENT ARE RESETTING? EACH EXEMPTION MUST BE ENUMERATED AND ADDRESSED INDIVIDUALLY. ORDINANCES ARE NOT CAPRICIOUS. RATHER THEY EXIST TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS AND WELL BEING OF THE CITY RESIDENTS.

ESPECIALLY THE ORDINANCE REQUIRING VALET PARKING BE WITHIN 500 QUOTES. QUICK NOTE HIS GRAPHIC WHERE HE SAID 600 FT. IT'S ACTUALLY 756 100. FT. REQUIRES YOU GO THE WRONG WAY DOWN THERE. TO REPEAL THEM. ELECTORALLY MAKES A MOCKERY OF THE WHOLE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, SIR. THAT LUANN LUANN STILLMAN DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY RIGHT NOW CONDUCTED BY ME, TOO. WE NEED TO. ALRIGHT I'LL PICK YOU LAST. HOW WAS THAT? OKAY. CHIP HAZARD. AND I'M GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE HARD TIME ADDRESSING ALL THE ISSUES THAT ARE BROUGHT UP HERE, MAINLY BECAUSE THIS APPLICATION IS NOT THE SAME APPLICATION THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE, UH, THE OTHER BOARD COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT. FOR NOW, THEY'RE SAYING THERE NOT REQUESTING BALLET, AND THEY'RE REQUESTING PARKING EXCEPTIONS. THAT HAPPENS UP A WHOLE BIG CAN OF WORMS, AND I DON'T THINK IT'S FAIR TO ADDRESS IN THIS AMOUNT OF TIME, ESPECIALLY WITH ONLY THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. BROUGHT UP ABOUT A DRINK, YOU KNOW, ADDRESSING THAT ISSUE CASE BY CASE YOU CAN'T DECIDE THAT TONIGHT. IT'S JUST NOT FAIR. THE PUBLIC HASN'T HAD MUCH NOTICED.

THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ADVICE, SO I'M GOING TO READ MY PREPARE EVERY MONTH. I APPRECIATE THE DIFFICULTY OF THE POSITION. YOU PLACE YOURSELVES IN WHEN APPLICATIONS LIKE THIS ONE. ONE WE ARE DISCUSSING REQUEST SPECIAL CONSIDERATION AND DEVIATION FROM ESTABLISHED ZONING. YOU FIVE COMMISSIONERS ARE ASKED ABOUT YES OR NO APPLICATION THAT'S BEEN PRESENTED TO YOU AND REPRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC. BUT THAT IS NOT THE APPLICATION OF PRESENTING TONIGHT YOU HAVE TO CONSIDER THE APPLICANT BUT PLEASE REMEMBER ALL OF YOU THAT YOU REPRESENT THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY. NOT THE CITY. THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY. SOUTHEAST SEMINAL AGAIN IS NOT AN ALLEYWAY. IT'S A NEIGHBORHOOD AND YOU'LL SEE THAT TONIGHT BECAUSE YOU HAVE A LOT OF NEIGHBORS HERE. MOST OF THE NEIGHBORS, THERE'S 30/30 RESIDENTS SINCE RESIDENCES THERE AND OVER 70 RESIDENTS THAT I KNOW ARE OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT AND VOICE THAT OPPOSITION YOU NEED TO CONSIDER US OVER THE WISHES OF ONE APPLICANT. ISSUES THAT EVERYONE HAS PRESENTED AN I'VE EVEN EMAILED EVERYONE OF YOU. YOU KNOW WHAT THEY ARE? THEY'RE TRAFFIC, THEIR SAFETY AND THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE. THOSE ISSUES ARE REALLY UTMOST IMPORTANCE TO EVERYONE WHO HAS CHOSEN TO LIVE HERE ON SOUTHEAST SEMINAL AND BECOME A RESIDENT OF STEWART. SO I ASKED YOU AND I ANTICIPATE THAT YOU WILL YOUR WAY OUT OUR CONCERNS AND OUR OPINIONS BECAUSE WE'RE RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS. AND NOT JUST WAY OUT THE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE APP OF THE APPLICANTS. YOU HAVE A DEVELOPMENT IN FRONT OF YOU. HE HAS A RIGHT TO REQUEST DEVELOPMENT. BUT YOU HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO CONSIDER US THE RESIDENTS. NOW I TAKE EXCEPTION TO A LOT OF THE WAY THIS WAS PRESENTED IN PARTICULAR. THE APPLICANT TOLD YOU THAT THERE WAS OVERWHELMING CONSENSUS THAT THE RESIDENTS WERE NOT WERE ONLY CONSIDERED WITH VALET THAT MAYBE HIS OPINION, BUT THAT IS NOT THE FACT. HE'S ASSUMING THAT'S THE OPINION BECAUSE THERE WERE SO MANY ISSUES RAISED. WE COULDN'T ADDRESS THEM ALL, JUST LIKE WE CAN'T ADDRESS THEM ALL NOW. IT WAS BROUGHT UP AT THIS MEETING JUST EARLIER TONIGHT ABOUT EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT ZONING AND LAND USE. BUT WHAT USE IS THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO SIT HERE AND EXEMPT AND JUST DISREGARD ALL OF THAT ZONING TO SATISFY DEVELOPER THANK YOU. MARTY BLINKY MARTY, MR BLAKE. AT LAST EVERYONE'S LATE, MISTER ED

[02:00:01]

CINDY. THE MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS. UM, I'VE MET WITH MOST OF YOU. AND I HAVE EXPRESSED MY CONCERN FOR VALET PARKING. AND IN THOSE MEETINGS, WE TALKED ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF SOME FORM OF PARKING EXEMPTION FOR THIS PROPERTY, GIVEN THE FACT THAT IT WAS WITHIN A REASONABLE DISTANCE OF WHERE THE CURRENT BOUNDARY WAS JUST THAT TIME I'VE TRIED TO FIND EXAMPLES OF WHERE PARKING EXEMPTIONS HAVE BEEN GIVEN OUTSIDE OF THE OLD DISTRICT ZONE. I FOUND NONE. I ALSO LOOKED AT WHAT WERE SOME OF THE ACTIVITIES IN THE PAST THAT ALLOWED YOU TO MOVE THAT BOUNDARY. I FOUND NONE. I ASKED ABOUT THE MOVEMENT OF THE BOUNDARY AND HOW IT WOULD TAKE PLACE AND THE BEST I COULD DETERMINE WAS IT WOULD BE MOVED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF SEMINOLE STREET. TO THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE ACROSS THE STREET FROM WHERE THE BOUNDARY CURRENTLY EXISTS. IN OTHER WORDS, ALL OF THE RIVERFRONT PROPERTY WOULD BE EXEMPTED FROM PARKING. THERE ARE THREE EMPTY LOTS ON THAT STREET. THAT MEANS THAT IF A PRECEDENT IS SET, WHY WOULDN'T THEY BE ENTITLED TO HAVE A PARKING EXEMPTION? THEY'D BE WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE ZONE. ALL I ASK IS MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS A LEGAL BOUNDARY FOR US THAT WE'RE PROTECTED FROM FUTURE USE OF THAT LAND FOR A RESTAURANT AND THAT IF YOU DO GIVE THE EXEMPTION TO THIS ONE ON ONE COLORADO AVENUE THAT THAT EXEMPTION IS NOT GIVEN TO ANYBODY ELSE IN THE SEMINOLE STREET AREA, WE DON'T NEED A RESTAURANT. WE CAN TOLERATE A RESTAURANT. AT LEAST I CAN TOLERATE IT. BUT I AM NOT GOING TO SUPPORT IT. IF THERE IS ANY POSSIBILITY TO BE MORE THAN JUST THAT ONE RESTAURANT BECAUSE THAT MAKES IT SEVEN IN TWO BLOCKS, WE'RE GONNA HAVE 8910. WE MIGHT AS WELL CALL IT SEMINOLE STREET. BOURBON STREET, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT'LL BE LIKE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. ASL AIRWAY. I THINK I JUST THINK FOR CLARITY NOT NOT TO GET INTO, YOU KNOW, RESPONDING TO EACH COMMENT, BUT JUST FOR CLARITY. WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED IS PARKING EXEMPTIONS FOR THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL. VERSUS THOSE ADDITIONAL. MR LARAWAY, JUST JUST TO HELP. BRING CLARITY. BRUCE TO HEAR YOU, BECKY. WELCOME, SIR.

WELCOME, BRUCE. UM I LIVE ON SOME WALL STREET. I LIVED THERE. ABOUT 15 YEARS. I DROVE DOWN THAT STREET TO TRY AND FIND OUT HOW FOR 15 YEARS. HMM. THERE WASN'T FINALLY WOMAN PUT A SIGN FRONT AND I'M MORE. I LIKE IT THERE WITH TOWARD DOWN OUR HOUSE AND TURNED ON THE OTHER HOUSE.

AND WE BUILT A BEAUTIFUL HOME. YEAH I GOTTA TELL YOU ONE THING THAT REALLY REALLY GRABS. THESE PEOPLE SO FAR THEY CALLED US IN AN ALLEY. AND. SOME OF THE PEOPLE YOU HEARD JUST NOW. THEY HAD MORE TIME MILLION DOLLAR HOUSES. EVERY NIGHT I GO OUT AND I WALKED MY DOLLAR. AND. THERE'S YOU KNOW, YOU SEE MORE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. COME AROUND. WHICH WAS FINE. BUT HOW LONG ARE THEY GOING TO DO THAT? AND OH, ARE THEY GOING TO GET AROUND THERE WHERE THEY COULD TURN IT INTO HER RAISED HER. AND SOMEBODY'S GOING TO GET HELP. SO I LIVED THERE. I LOVE IT THERE. YOU HEARD MY NEIGHBORS. YOU HEARD MY FRIENDS. IT'S JUST IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE WHATSOEVER. THANK YOU, SIR. MR CAMPENNI, TOM. THANK YOU. YOU SAID, YOU KNOW. WHEN WE APPROVED IT AT THE CRB,

[02:05:07]

IT WAS A BIT DIFFERENT. BUT I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY THEY DON'T WANT THE VALET. MAKES SENSE. BUT . THAT THOSE SPACES THOSE PARKING SPACES IF THE DEAL COULD BE WORKED OUT AS LEAD, MIKE HAS SAID THAT THEY WILL BECOME FOR THE EMPLOYEES. NOT ONLY OF THAT RESTAURANT BUT OF OTHERS.

BECAUSE CURRENTLY THEY DO TAKE UP PARKING SPACES THAT WOULD GENERALLY GO TO THE PUBLIC EATING DOWNTOWN, SO I THINK IT'S THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU KEEP THAT AND GIVE THEM THE PARKING EXEMPTION, BUT THEY NEED TO PROVIDE THE OTHER 42. IF YOU CAN WORK OUT A DEAL AS MIKE AND WE BELIEVE YOU CAN FOR LIABILITY . I THINK THAT'S PERFECT SOLUTION. AS TO THE MUSIC. I ADDED THAT CONDITION. I KNOW WHAT IT'S LIKE TO NOT BE ABLE TO SIT ON MY BACK PORCH SATURDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHT. BECAUSE OF MUSIC. NO I'M ON THE WATER AND ON THE WATER MUSIC TRAVELS. AND SO I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO USE MY BACK PORCH BY THE FRIDAY OR SATURDAY NIGHT. IN YEARS. AND YOU HAVE PEOPLE WHO NOW LIVE ON SEMINOLE, AND THEY'RE GONNA EXPERIENCE THE SAME PROBLEM BECAUSE I GOT TO TELL YOU THERE IS NO ENFORCEMENT OF THE NOISE ORDINANCE. IT'S ALL MAKE BELIEVE. AND I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE. I'M SURE MY FRIEND KURT COULD SPEAK TO THAT. SO I AM. I AM SAYING THAT THIS IS A GREAT PROJECT BECAUSE WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE RESIDENTIAL ON SEMINAL FOR THAT SPACE. WHAT I THINK YOU NEED TO BRING IT A FEW PROTECTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE THAT LIVED THERE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. MR. MARK MARK BRECK VILLE. MARK BRACK BILL AND I'M A RESIDENT IN THAT AREA DOWN TO EIGHT SOUTHEAST ON THE STREET. I WAS ALSO THE NO VOTE ON THE CRB RELATIVE TO THIS PROJECT. UM AND, UH, THE REASON I VOTED AGAINST IT WAS THAT THERE IS NO PARKING AND I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE A PARKING PROBLEM IN STUART AND WE DON'T NEED YOU KNOW EVERYTHING'S FINE, BUT BUT THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THE WAY IT WAS BEING PROPOSED WAS LUDICROUS. THE ALTERNATIVE AFTER THE MEETING THEY HAD WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH WAS GOOD IS A BETTER ALTERNATIVE. BUT UM, BUT IT'S STILL AN ISSUE. IT'S STILL A PROBLEM THAT WE'RE PUTTING ANOTHER THING RIGHT THERE. THAT'S GOING TO GENERATE A LOT OF TRAFFIC. SO I THINK IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO THIS, YOU NEED TO DO IT WITHIN WHAT THE EXISTING PLAN WAS DOWNTOWN. I MEAN, THE EASIEST WAY TO MOVE THE DO THIS IS TO MOVE IT IN UNDER THE DOWNTOWN EXEMPT PARKING BECAUSE IT'S RIGHT NEXT TO IT, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, PUT IT IN THE SATURATION DISTRICT. BECAUSE THAT'S THE REASON WE HAVE. THAT SATURATION DISTRICT IS TO AVOID SOMETHING LIKE THIS BECOMING A BAR. SO I UNDERSTAND THE NEIGHBORS AND I HAVE A CONCERN, TOO. AND I WOULD HAVE MORE OF A CONCERN. IF THAT'S A BAR, AND PEOPLE ARE COMING OUT OF THERE, DRUNK AND STUMBLING DOWN MY STREET AND YOU KNOW WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT YOU KNOW THAT SHOULD BE WITHIN OUR OUR DISHES ARE SATURATION DISTRICT AND IT SHOULD BE SUCH THAT RIGHT NOW. THERE IS NO ROOM FOR THAT KIND OF LIQUOR LICENSE IN THE CITY OF STEWART. SO ANYWAY, THAT'S MY TAKE. THANK YOU, SIR. UH MISS LAUREAN, STILLMAN, YOUR TURN. COME ON, SAY THE NEXT. THEY'RE NOT HEARING YOU, BECKY. GOOD EVENING PLANNING ON SPEAKING AND I'M VERY NERVOUS. EVEN THE MARKET RETIRED TEACHER I'M USED TO SPEAKING BUT I HAD TO SAY SOMETHING. UM PEOPLE ALREADY BROUGHT UP BEING REFERRED TO TONIGHT AS SEMINAL STRIPPING AND ALLIE. I RESENT THAT. AND I MENTIONED THE LAST MEETING WE MET WITH THE DEVELOPER. HE CALLED US HE FORGOTTEN STEPCHILD OF STEWART. ART STREET IS BEAUTIFUL. WE PUT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS HE ADDED SALT TOGETHER TO REHAB OUR HOUSES, WE HAVE A LOVELY, FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD. I HOPE YOU'RE NOT THINKING OF THIS RESTAURANT AS THE SAVING GRACE IS BEING PRESENTED TO YOU THAT'S GOING TO BEAUTIFY OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS BEAUTIFUL. WE DO NOT NEED A SAVING GRACE. ALWAYS GOING TO DO IS BRING LOTS OF TRAFFIC. THE LAST SPEAKER JUST MENTIONED HELPFULLY, NOT BECOMING A BAR. EVERY WEEKEND. WE SEE DRUNKS PART RIGHT ACROSS THE MARSH STREET, ONE ON ONE SOUTHEAST CENTRAL. LAST WEEK, WE SAW MALE SO DRUNK. HE CALLED AN UBER AND STUMBLED INTO THE UBER. THANK GOSH, HE DID NOT DRIVE. BUT THAT

[02:10:08]

IS OUR CONCERN. ALSO TRAFFIC IS BAD. NOW THIS IS GOING TO BE SO MUCH WORSE. BUT PLEASE DON'T APPROVE IT THINKING WE NEED A BEAUTIFUL RESTAURANT TO SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT IS NOT AN ALLEY. IT IS NOT THE FORGOTTEN STEPCHILD AS IT HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU, MAN. MR ERNEST, I DON'T HAVE YOUR ADDRESS. YOU CAN COME FORWARD, BUT WHY SHE LEFT OFF YOUR ADDRESS? COULD YOU GIVE ME YOUR ADDRESS? MAY I HAVE IT, SIR? UH, JOHNSON AVENUE. 801 JOHNSON AVENUE. OKAY GOOD ENOUGH . I GOT BETTER POST OFFICES. I PICK UP MY MAIL. GREETINGS, SMALL TOWN. DO IT. COMMISSIONERS. SMALL TOWN I EMPHASIZE. YOU KNOW, IT MAKES ME SICK TO DRIVE DOWN SEMINOLE STREET. I SEE THESE BEAUTIFUL LITTLE HOUSES THERE. THE HISTORY THE HISTORY OF STEWART. WHAT WE HAD IN STUART. WHERE WAS MR MCCARTHY? WHEN YOU APPROVED SAILFISH COLD THAT MAKES ME SICK TO SEE THAT SITTING ON SEMINOLE STREET. WHERE WAS MR MCCARTHY WHEN YOU APPROVED RIVER HOUSE? THAT MAKES ME SICK TO SEE THAT. BEAUTIFUL LITTLE HOMES. THESE POOR PEOPLE, SEMINAL STREET'S BEEN ABUSED BY YOU PEOPLE. YOU VOTED YOU VOTED TO DESTROY SEMINOLE STREET. I WISH THERE'S SOME WAY WE COULD TAKE IT BACK. PARKING LET'S JUST TALK ABOUT PARKING FOR A MINUTE. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, I'M SITTING HERE THINKING YOU PEOPLE APPROVE CREEK SIDE AND YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS. THAT'S AN OXYMORON. MY WIFE AND I LOVE TO COME DOWNTOWN AND GO TO TA BURNS WAS THAT A DECADE AGO? TA BURN. YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE IT WAS. IT WAS DOWNTOWN. THEY HAD THEY HAD A WOOD FIRED PIZZA OVEN. WE LOVE TO GO THERE. IS OWNED BY MIKE. I TOLD MIKE I GO AROUND THE BLOCK ONE TIME. NO PARKING SPACE. I'LL GO TO FLANIGAN'S. I'LL GO TO CARSON'S. I'LL GO WITH HER PARKING SPACES. AND THERE ARE MANY TIMES WE DIDN'T GO TO TA VERN'S, BECAUSE THERE'S NO POCKET BECAUSE YOU'VE OPENED DEVELOPED THE CITY. YOU VOTED OVERDEVELOPMENT CITY. I'VE ASKED MR MCCARTHY IF HE'D GO TALK TO THE DEVELOPMENT CREEK SIDE AND COME IN WITH A PLAN LIKE THIS POTEET MOTEL OF TWO STORIES AT CREEK SAKE. YOU DIDN'T NEED HIM TO PROVE WHAT HE PROPOSED YOU RUBBER STAMP WITH THE DEVELOPERS WANT. YOU DON'T NEED TO DO THAT.

YOU COULD HAVE SAID, GO SEE MR MCCARTHY, AND HE WILL GIVE SOMETHING THAT BELONGS IN STUART. THIS SAME PARK. YOU'RE TAKING PARKING AWAY FROM KARA. FRUITS AND ROOTS. YOU'RE TAKING PARK AND AWAY FROM JEN, I EAT THERE. I GO THERE TWICE A WEEK. THEY HAVE WONDERFUL FOOD. BUT I TOLD JEN AND CARRY TODAY. I WILL NOT COME THERE IF I DON'T HAVE A PARKING SPACE PROVING CREEK SIDE THAT PARKING AWAY. I CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU'RE DOING TONIGHT. TALKING ABOUT THIS. YOU ARE SPEAKING OF THE WRONG ONE, AND THEN YOU KNOW IT. WHICH NUMBER WERE YOU SPEAKING FOR NUMBER ABOUT? HE'S TALKING ABOUT LAST MEETING YOUR YOU YOU ALREADY SPOKE ABOUT THIS TWICE, AND YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO SPEAK ABOUT NUMBER SEVEN ON ORIGIN ABOUT THAT. I'M TALKING ABOUT WHAT? YOU HOW YOU DESTROYED SEMINOLE STREET. THANK YOU, SIR. TO DO SOMETHING FOR YOU BEFORE YOU PROBABLY STAND DEVELOPMENT. IN THIS RACE. JIM SPURGEON, PLEASE COME FORWARD, MR SPURGEON. THANK YOU, SIR. JIM'S VIRGIN. I LIVE WITH 47. SOUTHWEST OSCEOLA STREET APARTMENT 301 AS BEAUTIFUL CONDO THAT'S TRAVELS, OSCEOLA STREET AND SEMINAL TOO. SO I GOT A REALLY PRETTY PLACE AND WATCHED A LOT OF THINGS HAPPEN IN OUR AREA. UM MAIN REASON I WANTED TO SPEAK IS THAT WHEN I SAW THAT THERE WAS APPLE OR THE APPLICANT HEAVEN GIVEN YOU NOTICE THAT HE'D SET OUT NOTICES TO PEOPLE WITHIN 300 FT. I BELIEVE I'M WITHIN THAT CIRCLE, AND I NEVER HAVE GOTTEN A NOTICE. ON THIS, AND I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE GONE TO THE NOVEMBER MEETING AND DECEMBER MEETING AS WELL, BUT UM , ANYWAY, I JUST WANTED TO GO ON RECORD SAYING WE DIDN'T RECEIVE NOTICE. UM AND, UM, I GENERALLY THINK THAT THE TRAFFIC SITUATION THAT WE SEE I SEE THE WILD WEST

[02:15:05]

OUT THERE EVERY DAY. PEOPLE TRYING TO FIND PARKING PLACES. ANOTHER 100 FIFTY'S PERSONS OR SEAT. A RESTAURANT. IS GOING TO MEAN MUCH MORE DIFFICULTY IN FINDING PARTYING AND. WHAT HAPPENS TO US ONE SEMINARS STREET IS THE TRAFFIC PATTERN OF DELIVERY TRUCKS USE THAT AND I SEE JUST ANOTHER DELIVERY TRUCKS COMING DOWN THERE. WE HAVE HER ONE BALCONY BOLSTERED UP RIGHT NOW FROM TRUCKS HITTING THE BUILDING. AND, UM, I THINK, REALLY, IF WE FIND A BETTER SOLUTION FOR PARKING RATHER THAN EXACTLY THAT WOULD BE GOOD. THANK YOU, SIR. SEAN REED. MR READS. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS SEAN READ FOR THE RECORD. UM I BELIEVE MOST PEOPLE SUPPORT THE CONCEPT OF IT. OBVIOUSLY THE RESIDENTS HAVE SPOKEN. THE BIGGEST ISSUE IN THIS CITY IS TRAFFIC. I DID READ THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, AND ACCORDING TO IT, THERE'S 390 MORE DAILY TRIPS THAT ARE GOING TO BE ADDED TO IT. I BELIEVE THE DENSITIES WOULD BE MUCH HIGHER DOING THIS, THEN, YOU KNOW, MAYBE THE FOUR STORIES THAT THEY SUGGESTED BECAUSE THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET ZONING CODES AND BUILDING CODES. THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO COME IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION ASKING FOR A PARKING VARIANTS. ALSO AS FAR AS THE SEATING LIKE TOM SAID, I DON'T BELIEVE ANYBODY IN FORCES THAT BECAUSE THERE ARE OTHER PROJECTS IN THE CITY WHERE, AFTER GETTING A CEO, THEY HAVE ADDED MORE SEATS. IT HASN'T BEEN ENFORCED BY ANYBODY. I DON'T THINK IT GETS ENFORCED AT ALL. AND AS FAR AS THE VALET, THERE WAS 46 SELF PARKING SPACES IF PEOPLE SELF PARKED AT THAT PROJECT. BUT IF THEY VALIDATE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN 72 IF EVERYTHING WAS PERFECT. AND I ALSO NOTICED THERE WERE SIX LETTERS IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT THAT WERE SENT TO JODI KUGLER OR DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. MOST OF THEM WERE VERY GENERIC. THEY WERE THE SAME SIX LETTERS. JUST RINSE AND REPEAT. AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, WE LIVE IN THE CITY OF STEWART. WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE UNIQUE. WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DIFFERENT. AND I BELIEVE THE WAY THE COMMISSION HAS VOTED OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS. THERE'S NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT US AT ALL. EVERYTHING HAS BEEN APPROVED MULTIPLE TIMES. LIKE WHEN DO WE SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH AND STAND UP FOR THE RESIDENTS. WE VOTE FOR THE COMMISSION AT THE END OF THE DAY, AND THESE DEVELOPERS COME IN HERE AND ASK FOR WHATEVER THEY WANT, AND IT SEEMS THEY GET IT. THANK YOU HAVE A GOOD NIGHT. MR VALENTI, MARTY.

GOOD EVENING. MAYOR BRUNER. GOOD EVENING, CITY COMMISSIONERS. GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING. GOOD EVENING. UH ATTORNEY MORE MORE. TELL AND MR BAGGETT I'M MARTY BLINKY. I'VE LIVED HERE SINCE 1960 COACH. COACH YEAH, I WAS CAME BACK FROM COLLEGE. GRADUATED FROM MARIN COUNTY. BY THE WAY, 19TH 73. AND I BECAME A TEACHER, UH, FROM HIGH SCHOOL LATER TEAM OF STUDENTS AND VOLLEYBALL COACH AND YES, I AM IN THE HALL OF FAME. OH YEAH. BEFORE I TRY TO TALK TO YOU SPEAK TO YOU WITH THE BETTER ANGELS. I JUST WANNA ACKNOWLEDGE MY WIFE. AND ALL THE PEOPLE THAT CAME OUT TO SUPPORT SOME OF ST THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. WE OPPOSE. THIS RESTAURANT. IT'S A NICE IDEA. IT LOOKS REALLY NICE, BUT THERE'S A LOT OF PROBLEMS ALREADY. THEY'VE FOR VARIANCES.

THEY WANT TO AMEND AND CHANGE AND YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU START BENDING THE RULES START MAKING MORE PROBLEMS. JUST LAST NIGHT. LOOK AT IT. THE GUY KICKED OFF ON THE CENTER OF THE FIELD GOAL.

THEY WENT IT JUST BENT. I TELL YOU WHAT, YOU DON'T WANT TO BEND RULES. MY MOTHER CAME HERE IN 1972. I MEAN, SHE MOVED TO SEMINAL 1972 BECAUSE WE LIVE AT 42 SOUTHEAST, SEMINAL. AND SHE LOVED THE AMBIANCE OF THE ROAD. THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS BEEN AROUND FOR OVER 130 YEARS. JUST FOUR STORES. DOORS FROM HER IS WHAT'S ERNEST LIONS? NOW THAT HOUSE WAS BUILT IN 1891. WHEN THAT AREA WAS CALLED PAS. YOU WERE THINKING ABOUT POTS, WEREN'T YOU, BUT ANYWAY. UH, HERE. I WOULD BE LIVID. ABOUT HAVING A RESTAURANT THERE WITH 120 FT OF HIS HOUSE. NOW THE GUY ERNIE. I

[02:20:07]

KNEW ERNIE AND HE WOULD BE OPPOSED TO THIS IDEA, AND HE WROTE A BOOK CALLED THE LAST CRACKER BARREL, AND IN THAT BOOK , HE CALLED THIS AREA OF PARADISE PARADISE STORY IS A GREAT PLACE. THIS RESTAURANT, THOUGH IT'S NOT NEEDED. PEOPLE ARE ON THE ON SEMINAL. DO NOT WANT IT. WE WENT OUT AND DID A PETITION OURSELVES. MY WIFE AND I. WE HAD OVER NEARLY 100 NAMES OF PEOPLE WHO SAID NO TO THIS IDEA NOW WE DIDN'T HAVE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE NEUTRAL. THEY WERE MORMONS DOWN AT THE FLAGLER PARK. THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE COMMITTED. MY WIFE AND I INHERITED THE HOUSE. IN 2020. BUT A LOT OF MONEY INTO IT. MADE IT INTO HISTORIC HOME KEPT THE HISTORY OF THE WHOLE AREA. COME BY US. COME BY AND SEE IT. 42 SOUTH EAST SEMINAL, BEAUTIFUL AND I THANK MY WIFE FOR ALL THE HARD WORK THAT SHE HELPED PUT INTO IT. I THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU, SIR MCBRIDE. HELEN RIGHT AFTER MISS MCBRIDE IS ANNIE MCMILLAN. MCBRIDE. I DON'T LIVE IN THE AREA. I LIVE ON FLAMINGO AVENUE, BUT THERE'S A FEW THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN SAID HERE THAT BRO. UM, FIRST OF ALL, CAM COMPETITIVE. DON'T WANT THIS ON RECORD, BUT HE WAS 100% RIGHT. YEAH. SO CURIOUS. MY GRANDSON. MAYBE I AGREE WITH YOU ON THE NOT WANTING THAT ON THE RECORD, UH, MY GRANDSON'S TRAINER. WELL, HE LOVES TRAINS AND THAT HE'S STAYING WITH ME AND HE SAID, GRANDMA, CAN WE GO DOWN TO THE BRIDGE TO ANSWER BRIDGE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TRAINS, AND IT WAS SATURDAY SATURDAY NIGHT. AT LIKE QUARTER TO 10. AND WE CAME DOWN AND LET ME TELL YOU, I TELL EVERYBODY I COULDN'T BELIEVE I WAS IN DOWNTOWN STUART AND NOISE FROM MUSIC. YOU'RE JUST BOMBARDED BECAUSE YOU'RE BY THE WATER AND THE SOUNDS REALLY SOMETHING ELSE , SO I KNOW IT SHOULD BE NO MUSIC. SECONDLY, THERE IS ONE HANDICAPPED PARKING SPOT. IT'S A CITY AND IT'S ON THE CITY STREET. IN FRONT OF THE HOME. THIS MORE THAN ONE HANDICAPPED PERSON. IN STUART. LET ME TELL YOU, IT'S VERY HARD TO FIND HANDICAPPED PARKING. IF YOU KNOW YOU'VE GOT NO AND SECONDLY, I APOLOGIZE BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE SAYING THE ALLEY I BELIEVE IT HERE 50 YEARS AND I DO LOVE TALKING TO SENIORS IN YOUR SISTER PEOPLE WHO'VE BEEN HERE LONG BEFORE I WAS WHEN YOU COME DOWN COLORADO. YOU TAKE A RIGHT YOU'RE ON SEMINOLE STREET.

BEAUTIFUL HOME. IF YOU TAKE A LEFT, THAT'S OUR BUSINESS DISTRICT. AND IT WAS AN ALLEYWAY FOR THE BUSINESSES. THAT'S GOOD DELIVERIES WERE MADE. THE GARBAGE WAS PICKED UP. AND THAT BACK IN THE OLD DAYS. BEFORE ALL THESE YOUNG PEOPLE MOVED THEIR HOME IN HERE AT THEIR HOMES.

THAT THAT'S THAT'S THE CONFUSION. TAKE A. THE RIGHT. YOU'RE ON SIMINO STREET IF YOU TAKE THE LEFT IT WAS THE ALLEYWAY AND THEN PEOPLE STARTED WITH THE THEY MADE IT ABROAD.

IT'S LIKE A LOT OF OUR ALLEYWAYS, BUT ANYWAY I PERSONALLY. WITH THE NEIGHBORS WOULD BE LIKE IT. COMMISSIONER ACCOUNTS WANTED TO PUT A RESTAURANT ON MY STREET. LET ME TELL YOU, I'D HAD MY NEIGHBORS HERE. JUST LIKE ALL THESE ARE HERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, MR MCMILLAN. HI THERE, ANNIE MCMILLAN. UM. AND I'M HERE TO SUPPORT SAVE OUR SEMINOLE STREET NEIGHBORS. I'M HERE TO SUPPORT THEM. BUT MORE THAN THAT I WAS HERE. AH ON THE EIGHTH. I CONTINUE. I'D LIKE TO TELL YOU THAT I CONTINUE TO STAND. HI. HERE I GUESS I CONTINUE TO STAND BY MY WORDS ON ON JANUARY, THE EIGHTH THAT WE. THAT WE MEANING THAT THE TAXPAYERS, THE VOTERS, AND THE RESIDENTS NEED TO NUMBER ONE. CLEARLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS CURRENTLY ALLOWABLE IN OUR COMPACT DOWNTOWN AREA. WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT NUMBER TO AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOICE AS WE'RE DOING TONIGHT, AGAIN, OUR OPINIONS ON WHAT IS DISRUPTIVE AND TROUBLING. WE'RE DOING THAT.

AND NUMBER THREE TO BE GIVEN AN EXPLANATION OF WHAT CAN BE CHANGED. IN OUR CODES AND

[02:25:03]

REGULATIONS IF NECESSARY. AND HOW THAT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED. THREE THINGS. I THINK THE TIME IS NOW. FOR SEVERAL PRESENTATIONS BY OUR CITY STAFF. AND LISTENING SESSIONS TO HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC. FOR THE THREE POINTS LISTED ABOVE. THIS WOULD HELP CALM THE WATERS. AND ADD CLARITY TO FUTURE CONVERSATIONS ON DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS. AND ONCE AGAIN MY OFFER STILL STANDS TO ASSIST YOU IN WHATEVER WAY I CAN HELP TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR UNDERSTANDING THIS CURRENT SITUATION AND YOUR ONGOING WILDERNESS TO MAKE OUR DOWNTOWN.

A BETTER PLACE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL OF THE PEOPLE IS ANYONE ELSE? OKAY? NO MORE. UM, I WILL SAY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY A FEW MORE WORDS LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND? SOME OF THE COMMENTS IF I MAY, IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AFRICAN. MIKE MCCARTHY. MCCARTHY ON ASSOCIATES LAND PLANNING. APPRECIATE IT. UM I HAVE A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE. I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS SOME INACCURACIES IN SOME STATEMENTS OF FALSE CLAIMS. UM YOU KNOW ALL A LOT OF THESE RESIDENTS WHEN THEY SAY THEIR ADDRESS AND WHERE THEY'RE LOCATED. THEY PURCHASED WITHIN A C R A COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA. AND MIXED USE ER FOR THAT. THERE ARE A PLETHORA OF USES THAT ARE ALLOWED THROUGHOUT THE SCIARRA IN THE URBAN WATERFRONT. AND THE SURROUNDING AREA AND I KNOW THAT AND I UNDERSTAND WHERE THEY'RE COMING FROM WHEN THEY LIVED HERE FOREVER. 10 YEARS.

MAYBE THEY'VE ONLY LIVED HERE TWO YEARS. YOU KNOW, THE SEMINAL BLUFF RIVER HOUSE WAS JUST CEO IN THE LAST A COUPLE OF YEARS. AND IT'S LIKE, YOU KNOW, ONCE YOU GET HERE AND YOU SHUT THE YOU SHOULD SHUT THE PEARLY GATES AND EVERYTHING SHOULD JUST STOP. RIGHT? WELL LET'S LET'S REWIND.

LET'S THINK ABOUT WHAT STUART WAS 2030 YEARS AGO. OKAY, BECAUSE. STEWART WAS IN A BAD PLACE. 2030 YEARS, MIKE. I WOULD SAY, FOCUS ON YOUR PROJECT AND NOT MISSING THEM. I AM. NO, THIS IS PART OF MY PROJECT. THANK YOU. AND SO IF IT WASN'T FOR REVITALIZATION AND REHAB. AND URBAN INFILL AND REUSE CITIES THROUGH WINDY, VIBRANT LIKE IT IS TODAY THAT IS ATTRACTED ALL THESE PEOPLE TO MOVE HERE. SO AS FAR AS THE EXEMPTION BOUNDARY. THERE WAS A STATEMENT MADE ABOUT ADJUSTING AN EXEMPTION BOUNDARY. WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO ADJUST ANY EXEMPTION BOUNDARY THROUGH THIS P D. WHAT IS OF DISCUSSION TONIGHT REGARDING EXEMPTION IS ONLY FOR THIS PIECE OF PROFIT.

SO I JUST WANT TO CLEAR THE YEAR THERE AS FAR AS I USE THE REFERENCE OF AN ALLEY. VALLEY. I UNDERSTAND. EXTENDS YOU KNOW, FROM COLORADO ALL THE WAY BACK UP AROUND SEMINAL BLUFF AND AROUND THE BOATHOUSE. I APOLOGIZE IF THAT'S OFFENSIVE, NOT TRYING TO FIT ANYBODY BY REFERENCE AGAINST AN ALLEY. IT'S JUST A MATTER OF FACT OF WHAT IT IS. UM AS FAR AS A. PARKING LEE SO WE REALLY CAN'T GO SECURE PARKING LEASE ON ANOTHER PERSON'S PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND THEN BE THE MIDDLEMAN AND GO GIVE IT TO THE CITY. HAPPY TO INTRODUCE WHOEVER WANTS TO REPRESENT THE CITY AND TAKE YOU TO MEET THE INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE THESE PARKING LOTS THAT ARE AVAILABLE. AS FAR AS A LEASE. IF YOU'D LIKE TO LEASE THOSE WOULD BE HAPPY TO MAKE THAT TRANSACTION HAPPENED FOR US. UM. SATURATES SATURATION DISTRICT. WE'RE NOT IN THE SATURATION DISTRICT. THIS IS A STANDALONE P U D. UM. ANYWAY I THINK I'VE COVERED MOST OF MOST OF THE ISSUES AT HAND. BUT WE'RE HERE TO REQUEST APPROVAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.

I'M HERE TO ANSWER THEM. YOU HAVE ANY FINAL COMMENTS YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE. AND I'D LIKE TO ALSO RESERVE THE RIGHT FOR OUR CLIENT ALSO SPEAK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, NICK SCHROEPFER. THE RECORD THERE'S JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANTED TO, UM UM CLEAR UP SO UM. WE BROUGHT THIS FORWARD AND I THINK DR SAM BACK AND I ORIGINALLY DISCUSSED THIS PROPERTY AND 2020 2021. AND, UM.

WE APPROACHED THE CITY, PROBABLY IN OVER SIMPLISTIC. UTOPIAN. SORT OF CONCEPT LIKE. HEY 18 7

[02:30:07]

OLD ACROSS THE STREETS. I GOT A BUNCH OF PARKING ON IT. AND CAN WE BE RESTAURANT HERE AND NOT HAVE PARKING HMM. AND, YOU KNOW THINGS ARE MORE COMPLICATED THAN THAT. SO WE GOT INTO THE CODE AND THE EXTENSION OF THE PARKING EXEMPTION DISTRICT AND YOU KNOW, LIKE MR LUCENTTECH CAME UP AND SAID, YOU KNOW, WELL, NOW DOES THAT INCLUDE ALL OF SEMINOLE AND IS, YOU KNOW, LIKE, IF YOU'RE GONNA INCLUDE THIS ONE, YOU KNOW, DO WE JUST INCLUDE THE NEXT ONE AND THE NEXT ONE AND THE NEXT ONE, AND SO YOU KNOW THAT GOT THAT GOT, YOU KNOW NEXT AND YOU KNOW, WE HAD TO PROVIDE A JUSTIFICATION FOR NOT HAVING THE PARKING AND SO THE VALLEY CONCEPT CAME IN, AND YOU KNOW, WE'VE WE'VE APPROACHED DR LEVIN, WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY DOWN THE ROAD AND YOU KNOW, WE THOUGHT ALRIGHT, GREAT. YOU KNOW, HERE'S A BIG PARKING LOT AND YOU KNOW IT CAN BE EASILY ACCESSED BY, YOU KNOW, BALLET AND YOU KNOW, COME TO FIND OUT AND YOU KNOW, RIGHTFULLY SO AND TALKING TO SOME OF THE RESIDENTS AND HEARING FROM THEM. IT'S NOT EXACTLY EASY, AND IT'S NOT EXACTLY UH, YOU KNOW, UH, YOU KNOW, A GOOD THING FOR THEM. AND SO, UM YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS DISCUSSED AT OUR COMMUNITY MEETING AND YOU KNOW, I FELT PERSONALLY LIKE THERE WAS SUPPORT FOR A RESTAURANT IN THIS LOCATION. JUST A BIG NO. NO ON THE VALET PARKING BUT THERE WAS ALSO OPPOSITION TO THAT PARKING LOT BEING USED FOR PARKING AT NIGHT, AND SO MY HESITATION AND ENTERTAINING THIS CONCEPT THAT WE WOULD SOMEHOW GO OUT AND BROKER A DEAL FOR THE CITY TO TURN THAT INTO PARKING, AS PART OF OUR CONDITION IS SORT OF IN DEFENSE OF THESE FOLKS HERE WHO DON'T WANT THAT. AND AT LEAST EXPRESSED TO ME THAT THEY DON'T WANT IT AND MAYBE THEY CAN SHOW BY RAISING HANDS. WHO WANTS THAT PARKING LOT TO BE USED FOR PARKING? FOR THE CITY. UM I DON'T THINK THEY WOULD SUPPORT THAT. AT LEAST THAT'S THE FEEDBACK WE GOT AT THE COMMUNITY MEETING. UM. THE. THE INTENT HERE IS NOT TO TURN THIS INTO A BAR. THE INTENT HERE IS NOT TO YOU KNOW, BLAIR LOUD MUSIC ALL NIGHT. I THINK WE WOULD BE IN THIS. THE ULTIMATE DECISION RESTS WITH DR SANDBOX, BUT I THINK A CONDITION THAT PROHIBITED AMPLIFIED MUSIC.

AFTER A CERTAIN TIME OR AT ALL I THINK WOULD BE CONSIDERED. UM I THINK PROHIBIT, YOU KNOW, AN EXEMPTION THAT PROHIBITED YOU KNOW, EVEN LIVE MUSIC OF ANY TYPE, I THINK WOULD BE YOU KNOW? SOMETHING THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED, UM THIS ISN'T AH! INTENDED TO BE A ROUGH AND ROWDY PLACE, AND I WOULD EXPECT NOTHING LESS THAN THIS COMMISSION TO YOU KNOW. TRY TO PLACE CONDITIONS ON THIS PROJECT THAT WILL PREVENT THAT. UH, SO. I THINK THAT WAS THE ONLY THOSE WERE THE ONLY THINGS UM, SATURATION DISTRICT. UM YOU KNOW IF THIS CONVERSATION SPILLS INTO EXTENSION OF THE SATURATION DISTRICT IF IT TURNS INTO EXTENSION OF THE PARKING EXEMPT DISTRICT I DO ASK THAT YOU ALL RECOGNIZE WE'VE BEEN OUT THIS FOR TWO YEARS AND, UM YOU KNOW? THE P U D KIND OF ENCOMPASSES THOSE THINGS, BUT FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROPERTY WITHOUT OPENING THIS UP INTO A PANDORA'S BOX OF WELL, WE'RE GOING TO INCLUDE THEM, YOU KNOW, I WANT TO BE INCLUDED HER. THEY WANT TO BE INCLUDED, OR DO WE INCLUDE THE NEXT ONE? UM SO I DO. ASK THAT THIS CONVERSATION, YOU KNOW, KIND OF FOCUS ON THIS, YOU KNOW, LITTLE BITTY PROJECT THIS LITTLE BITTY HOUSE THAT WE'D LIKE TO TURN INTO A LITTLE BITTY PLACE THAT WE CAN ALL GO AND YOU KNOW, IF THAT'S NOT THE COMMISSION'S WILL, THEN THEN THAT'S NOT THE COMMISSION'S WILL . AND WE'LL FIND ANOTHER USE FOR THE PROPERTY. BUT IT'LL LOOK A LOT DIFFERENT LOOK A LOT BIGGER AND BE A LOT MORE TIME. THANK YOU. HMM FOR MADAM, YOU'RE GONNA GO JUST GOING. I'LL GO AFTER COACH TO, UM EXPRESS HOW I FELT ABOUT THE PROPERTY. UM I CAN'T VOTE FOR THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY.

IT'S LIKE OVERKILL FOR ME. PEOPLE HAVE SPENT MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN RESTAURANTS AROUND THERE. I MEAN, MILLIONS. AND WE'RE GETTING TO WHERE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE PARKING PROBLEMS SO I CAN'T VOTE FOR IT BECAUSE OF PARTY. COMMISSION. SO I. I HAD JUST REALLY A QUESTION AROUND THAT PARKING LOT. I REALLY LIKED COMMISSIONER. RICH'S IDEA OF HAVING THAT PARKING STILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PATRONS. I THINK THE MAIN ISSUE OF IF I'M GATHERING THAT IS THE FEAR OF VALET DRIVER ZIPPING BACK AND FORTH AND THAT STREET AND SOMEBODY GETTING HURT. WHAT WAS THE. ARRANGEMENT THAT YOU GUYS WERE PLANNING ON HAVING WITH

[02:35:11]

LEVIN. WERE YOU PLANNING ON LEASING THOSE SPOTS? YEAH, WE WERE PLANNING ON ENTERING INTO A NIGHTTIME LEASE AGREEMENT SO THAT YOU KNOW, WE HAD PARKING SECURED WHEN HE WAS NOT USING IT, UM YOU KNOW, AND THEN THAT IS SEEN YOU KIND OF LIKE SHAKING YOUR HEAD. WHAT? WHY WHY WOULD YOU BE OPPOSED TO THAT IDEA OF HAVING THAT THOSE SPOTS BE AVAILABLE FOR THE RESTAURANTS, PATRONS VERSUS JUST HAVING DOWNTOWN FOR YOUR PATRONS? YES, I DON'T KNOW THAT. YOU KNOW WHAT? WHEN WE COME DOWNTOWN OR WHEN I COME DOWNTOWN, I LIVE IN THE CITY. COME DOWNTOWN TO EAT OFTEN, YOU KNOW? WE KIND OF PARTS WHERE WE PARK AND THEN EAT WHERE WE GO TO EAT, AND I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT PART OF DOWNTOWN HAS THAT KIND OF CONNECTION TO DOWNTOWN. SO I DON'T THINK THAT THE AVERAGE CUSTOMER FOR THIS RESTAURANT IS GOING TO FIND THAT PARKING SPOT. YOU KNOW, DOWN THE ROAD SIGNAGE UP FRONT THAT YOU KNOW IS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT RESTAURANT. MAYBE, YOU KNOW IT'S AGAIN. IT'S JUST THE THOUGHT OF LIKE NO PARKING REQUIREMENT. WIDE OPEN. GO FIND A SPOT IS LISTEN, I TENSE MAN, I GET IT. AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT YOU KNOW? IT. SO TRYING TO FIND A SOLUTION WHAT WE'RE AFTER AFTER OUR COMMUNITY MEETING OUT, I WOULD NOT WANT TO TIE US. YOU KNOW, SOMEHOW USING THAT PARKING LOT. TO THIS PROJECT. SIMPLY BECAUSE OF YOU KNOW WHAT WE TOLD THESE FOLKS AND THE DAMAGE THAT I THINK WILL COME TO THEIR WAY OF LIFE NOW. THAT ASIDE FROM THE YOU KNOW? TRANSACTIONAL E TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE GO TO DR LEVIN AND SAY, HEY, BY THE WAY, LIKE WE WERE GOING TO HAVE A CONTROLLED SITUATION WITH THE VALET COMPANY THAT WE HIRED THAT HAS THEIR OWN INSURANCE. THAT IS THEIR OWN THING. AND NOW BILLY, REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY DRINKS HE HAS BEFORE HE GETS TO US. IS GONNA PARK IN THIS PARKING LOT AND IT'S JUST OPEN. TO EVERYBODY THAT COMES AND SO YOU COULD SEE HOW THAT SAME LIABILITY SORT OF EXTENDED OUT. FOR THE CITY TO CARRY. BECAUSE OF YOUR RESTAURANT IS SIMILAR KIND OF AN ISSUE. I UNDERSTAND. YOU KNOW, IT'S THE SAME LIABILITY THAT YOU'VE GOT ON ON EVERY OTHER DOWNTOWN RESTAURANT AND WHAT WE ARE DOING IS ASKING TO BE ANOTHER RESTAURANT IN DOWNTOWN AND SO AT THE AT THE CORE OF THIS SQUARE IS YOU KNOW? IS THERE A DEMAND FOR ANOTHER RESTAURANT DOWNTOWN AND MY FEELING IS YES. AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT, YOU KNOW RESTAURANTS THAT WE HAVE DOWNTOWN AND YOU KNOW THE. SUCCESS THAT THEY'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, WE FEEL LIKE THERE'S RING FOR ANOTHER RESTAURANT. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE WATERFRONT RESTAURANTS THAT WE HAVE DOWNTOWN, THERE'S NOT WHAT KIND OF ANY AND UNIQUE SPOT WHERE THERE'S NOT A TON OF WATERFRONT, YOU KNOW, LIKE OUR DOWNTOWN DOESN'T FRONT THE WATER FROM AND SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE SUCCESS OF BOATHOUSE, YOU KNOW WE'RE KIND OF HERE WANTING TO YOU KNOW, REPLICATE THAT. UM, YOU KNOW, BOATHOUSE DOESN'T HAVE ANY PARKING ON IT. I DON'T KNOW HOW THEIR DUMPSTER WORKS. OURS IS MUCH BIGGER. THE YOU KNOW, IT'S A REQUEST AND UM, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE THAT ADDITIONAL PARKING MINUTES. A WHOLE OTHER CONVERSATION THAT THAT YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT TO GO HAVE AND I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT YEAH, PUTTING MYSELF IN DR LEVIN SHOES. I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT HAS THE SAME RESPONSE IS HEY, YOU KNOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A FAIRLY CONTROLLED SITUATION HERE. AGAIN. I'D ALSO GOOD TO BRING FORWARD TO, YOU KNOW, SECOND READING. I THINK THAT'S HAVING THAT CONVERSATION SO WE COULD ALL CHEW ON IT. YEAH. I MEAN, WE'LL TAKE NOTE OF IT. SO MY OTHER THOUGHTS AND YOU'RE GOOD TO GO, NICK. UM I LOVE THE IDEA OF THAT BOARDWALK EXTENDING MY QUESTION WAS, AND I'M PRETTY SURE I KNOW THE ANSWER WERE EXEMPT FROM FRANCHISES THERE CORRECT. RIGHT? UM I LOVE THAT THAT STAYS STICK SINGLE STORY. I LOVE THAT. PUBLIC WOULD HAVE ACCESS THERE VERSUS OTHERWISE NOT, YOU KNOW, BEING ABLE TO ENJOY THAT WATERFRONT. I THINK THAT'S GREAT. UM I DO. ALSO LIKE THE IDEA WHICH I KNOW YOU GUYS ARE GONNA WANT TO HEAR, BUT THE DEED RESTRICTION. I WOULD LOVE TO LIMIT THAT TO WHAT IT IS, IF WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE IT, EVEN THOUGH I KNOW WE'RE DOING THAT WITH THE P U D, I LOVE THAT IDEA. UM I'M WITH TOM. I KNOW MUSIC. I THINK YOU HAVE A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD RIGHT THERE. IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT RESTAURANT. IT NEEDS TO BE QUIET. BECAUSE THOSE HUMAN I KNOW YOU MAY DISAGREE. JUST GIVING YOU MY THOUGHTS. BUT I

[02:40:01]

WOULD HATE TO HAVE SPENT ALL THAT MONEY ON A PLACE TO LIVE AND BE ON THE WATER. AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN THIS THING POPS UP THAT WASN'T THERE BEFORE. NO MATTER WHAT THE ACCEPTABLE USES IN THAT AREA, JUST AND. AND LASTLY, YOU KNOW, I WAS HOPING WE COULD COME INTO THIS MEETING AND I WAS REALLY HOPEFUL. WITH THE VALET BEING REMOVED, THE NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD BE MORE OPTIMISTIC. TOWARDS THIS, BUT IT STILL SEEMS LIKE THERE'S ISSUE HERE. SO FOR ME, I RIGHT NOW WITH THE WAY THIS IS SITTING, I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE SUPPORTING THIS, SO I'M GOING TO BE A NO. UM I MEAN, WE'LL SEE WHERE THIS GOES FROM HERE. BUT YEAH. I'LL STOP WITH THAT MADAM MAYOR. I'M GOING TO HAVE THREE THINGS. I HOPE I CAN REMEMBER THEM. WHEN YOU MENTIONED ABOUT THE UNIQUE ONE OF A KIND, SO WE HAVE A DIS THE ALL THIS STARTED DISTRICT WHERE THE BUSINESSES HAD TO BE A CERTAIN WAY, AND OF COURSE, WE HAVE. DUFF IS THAT SUCH CHANGE, BUT THERE'S A WAY THAT THAT WAS APPROVED. NOW, IF WE HAD JUST EITHER ONE OF A KIND OF, UH BUT CHAIN OR DOES IT HAVE TO BE AN ABSOLUTE? IT'S ONLY THING AND WHEN WE HAVE THE CLOTHING STORE THAT WAS PART OF A CHAIN, AND WE HAD TO GO THROUGH A, UH, SPECIAL HEARING TO HEAR THAT, UM YOU DON'T KNOW WHO YOU'RE GONNA GET YET, BUT IS IT FOR SURE THAT IF WE DID HAVE THIS IN THAT, UM, DISTRICT THAT THAT WOULD BE A PART OF THE P U D THAT IT HAS TO BE ONE OF A KIND TYPE RESTAURANT. SO THAT WHEN THEY ASKED WHEN THEY TRY TO GO OUT AND GET SOMEBODY THEY DON'T GET. TELL ME A RESTAURANT IS EXPLAINING. OKAY, IT'S FLAT AGAINST DON'T GET ANOTHER PLAN AGAIN. COMMISSIONER CLARK, THAT WOULD BE UP TO THE BOARD. I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK THE BOUNDARIES OF WHERE THAT, UM THE ONLY RESTRICTION IS THAT IT'S IN THE FORMULA RETAIL AREAS. THAT'S WHAT I WAS FORMULA RETAIL. THE COMMISSION I WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE IT BASED UPON THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH FOR THE APPROVAL OF A FORMULA RETAIL BUSINESS IN THAT DISTRICT. THANK YOU FOR THAT TERM. MICHAEL IN THE FOURTH IS IN A RESTRICTED RESTRICTED IF THERE'S A PROHIBITION ON ANY, YES, THAT'S THE RETAIL WITHIN THAT DISTRICT SIX OR MORE, SIX OR MORE. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT IT IS, AND WE HAVE APPROVED THEM IN DOWNTOWN. THERE'S A COUPLE THERE NOW. MONKEYS YEAH, YEAH. DUFFY'S WAS THERE BEFORE THAT. AND UH, BUT IT'S A THEY HAVE TO COME IN AND DO AN APPLICATION AND GO THROUGH A HEARING IN ORDER TO GET APPROVED GOLDFISH. REMEMBER WE HAD TO DO GOLDFISH. THERE IS NOT A SINGLE RESTAURANT IN DOWNTOWN STUART. THAT WAS HERE IN THE NINETIES, OKAY, SINGLE RESTAURANTS CHANGED. OKAY WITH REGARD TO A P U D RIVER. MARIA'S WAS ON EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD, AND IT WAS TA VERN'S. THANK YOU. THANK YOU WITH REGARD TO THE P O D, P U D, AND WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CONDITIONS IN THE P U D AND THE TYPE OF RESOLUTIONS THAT, UM, CONTROL SOME OF THE DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTS ALONG SEMINAL THAT HAS HAPPENED, UM. WE'VE HAD SOME SOME PARCELS ON THERE THAT HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE PARKING EXEMPT THROUGH RESOLUTION. IS IT A TIGHTER AND MORE BETTER FIX TO HAVE IT THROUGH A P U D VERSUS A RESOLUTION. UH COMMISSIONER CLARK, THE BEAUTY DOES GIVE YOU UM RES OWNS THE PROPERTY. TO THAT URBAN TO THE TO THE PD REQUIREMENTS. UM. ESSENTIALLY RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A MAJOR URBAN CONDITIONAL USE OR A URBAN PLAN DEVELOPMENT. UM DEPENDING ON WHAT TYPE OF INTENSITY AND DENSITY THAT THE PROJECTS LOOKING FOR UM, IN THIS CASE, THEY CHOSE A URBAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, SELFISH COBRAS AND URBAN PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THEY HAD SOME RELIEF ON SOME PARKING UM IT'S REALLY THE WILL OF THE APPLICANT. UM I FEEL IT'S MORE APPROPRIATE THROUGH A PLAN DEVELOPMENT AS THROUGH A CONDITIONAL USE, UM YOU HAVE AN ORDINANCE AS OPPOSED TO A RESOLUTION. YOU HAVE THREE. YOU HAVE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS. UH AS OPPOSED TO TWO. OKAY THANK YOU, MADAM MAYOR. THAT'S GOING TO BE MY LAST QUESTION. I HAVE TALKED TO YOU BEFORE. MISS KUGLER ON THIS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU PREPARED ANY BACKUP INFORMATION, AND MAYBE BETWEEN YOU AND MR MORTON ELEMENTS OF BAGGAGE. YOU CAN KIND OF PARSE THIS OUT TO THE PUBLIC. BUT TO EXPLAIN TO THE PUBLIC WITH REGARD TO THE PARKING EXEMPT AND THE SATURATION LEVEL AND WHERE WE ARE NOW AND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN

[02:45:03]

SOMEBODY COMES IN AND ARE BOTH THINGS TIED TOGETHER, THE PARKING EXEMPT AND THE SATURATION LEVEL. YES YES, COMMISSIONER CLARK. UH SO THE EXEMPTION AREA WAS AND IT WAS DEDICATED AS THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. UM THE FEW PARKING SPACES EVER ADDED AND THEN IN 2007, THE COLORADO AND CAME IN AND WE EXPANDED THE DISTRICT ONCE AGAIN. UM AT THAT TIME, THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY WAS NOT ADDED TO THE DISTRICT. THE SATURATION DISTRICT ADDED TO THE DISTRICT WHEN THE COLORADO IN WAS COMING IN AT THE TIME, AT ONE POINT IN TIME THIS THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY WAS REQUESTED TO COME IN. THEY'VE ALREADY THEY EXEMPT THEMSELVES OUT BECAUSE THEY WERE. IT WASN'T A NEED. AT THE TIME. THERE WERE STILL A SINGLE FAMILY THEY HAD WENT THROUGH AN URBAN CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW THE OFFICE SPACE. THAT'S THE 252 SQUARE FEET THAT YOU SEE TODAY. THAT WAS IN THE EARLY NINETIES. UM AT THAT TIME, I DO BELIEVE THEY WERE APPROACHED TO COME INTO ITS PARKING EXEMPTION DISTRICT AT THAT TIME. I DON'T THINK THERE WAS A NEED THE SATURATION DISTRICT OVERLAY IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS THE PARKING EXEMPTION EXCEPT FOR THE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE. UM OF THE PROPERTY. WE NEGOTIATED WITH THE FINE INLAND. NAVIGATION TO BUILD THE BOARDWALK ALONG THERE, SO WE DID NOT ADD THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE TO THE SATURATION DISTRICT. SO UH, RIGHT NOW, THE SATURATION DISTRICT GOING ALLOWS UP TO 30% OF THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSE TO BE ISSUED AND WE ARE AT THAT MAXIMUM TODAY. SO EVEN IF THEY GET A PARKING EXEMPT, THEY WOULDN'T BENEFIT FROM THE SATURATION.

LEVEL SATURATION DISTRICT LEVEL. NO THEY WOULD NOT BENEFIT AT THIS TIME UNLESS WE BROUGHT IN OTHER PROPERTIES. WHAT THEY DIDN'T SERVE ALCOHOL. CORRECT. CORRECT JUST FOR CLARITY. I DON'T THINK I THINK IT'S ITS RESTAURANT SPACE RIGHT RESTAURANTS PAID YES RESTAURANT WITH SERVING THE BUSINESS. IT'S THERE'S AN EXEMPTION FOR ANYTHING UNDER 50 SEATS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, OR CAFE, EXCEPTIONAL AS WELL. SQUARE FOOTAGE. JUST TO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT I DON'T THINK A DEED RESTRICTION IS SOMETHING. YOU KNOW, WE'RE PREPARED TONIGHT TO 13. I THINK THAT'S. THAT'S A PRETTY BIG DEAL. UM ZONING, YOU KNOW CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPERTY. WE GOT TO COME BACK HERE TO ASK. YOU KNOW PERMISSION TO CHANGE.

THERE'S DEED RESTRICTIONS ARE BOUGHT OUT AND YOU KNOW THAT BECOMES FAIRLY HEAVY. YOU KNOW? QUESTION MARK DOWN THE ROAD WHEN . PANDORA'S BOX OPENS BACK UP, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S ON THE TABLE. THE NOISE CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND IT REAL PROBLEM, BRO. YOU KNOW, SOLUTIONS CAN BE FOUND . I THINK NO NOISE AND MAYBE MR COMPANY CAN YOU KNOW ELABORATE ON WHAT HIS INTENTION WAS, BUT I THINK YOU'RE HARD PRESSED TO WALK INTO ANY RESTAURANT THAT HAS ZERO MUSIC AND SO YOU KNOW, FINDING A HAPPY MEDIAN, PRESENTING THE DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR WITH THE NOISE STUDY OF OUR FINAL, YOU KNOW, SPEAKER LAYOUT WITH OUR BUILDING PLANS, YOU KNOW THAT MIGHT ALLOW FOR ENOUGH MUSIC TO KEEP YES, YOU KNOW. STIMULATED IF YOU WILL, OR ENTERTAINED OR WHATNOT WITHOUT SPILLING OVER THE PROPERTY. UM, WE DID. DID YOU A RESTAURANT DOWN IN THE KEYS? WHERE WE WORK WITH THE SOUND STUDY GUY AND YOU KNOW, WE WERE ABLE TO, YOU KNOW, DEMONSTRATE. HOW YOU KNOW? THE PROPOSED USE WOULD REMAIN ON THE SITE. SO IF THAT WERE TO BE A CONDITION OF THE OF THE APPROVAL THAT YOU KNOW THAT GETS SUBMITTED WITH BUILDING PLANS WHERE WE'RE SHOWING SPEAKER LAYOUTS THAT MIGHT BE WAY TO ADDRESS THAT. UM SO IF. MIKE. DR SHANE BACK, YOU GUYS HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS. UM I MEAN, WE'RE HERE AT YOUR MERCY. WE'VE PUT TWO YEARS INTO THIS. IT'S APPROPRIATE TO HAVE A RESTAURANT DOWNTOWN. I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS. UH REGARDING THE NOISE. I THINK WE CAN WORK THROUGH THAT BETWEEN NOW AND SECOND READING, FIND SOME SOMETHING THAT'S PALATABLE FOR EVERYONE. UM. YOU KNOW, WE'VE TRIED TO ADDRESS ALL THE CONCERNS OF THE RESIDENTS. I'M NOT NOT SURE ELSE. WHAT'S TO OFFER AT THIS POINT. UM TO ONE STORY RESTAURANT. IN KEEPING WITH OUR SMALL DOWNTOWN BOUTIQUE RESTAURANT. PROVIDES A PUBLIC BENEFIT. PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT EXTENSION OF THE BOARDWALK, ETCETERA. UM YOU KNOW, I GUESS THE OTHER ALTERNATIVE, MY CLIENT WILL MOVE

[02:50:06]

FORWARD ANOTHER OTHER DIRECTION. QUITE QUITE WELL, I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND YOUR CONSIDERATION WOULD LIKE THE OPTION AND TRY TO MOVE FORWARD IF WE COULD IF WE CAN GARNISH YOUR SUPPORT, IF NOT UM, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD LIKE THE OPTION THAT CONTINUE AND TRY TO WORK SOME ELEMENTS OUT. ASK THE QUESTION, BROTHER MAYOR YES, COMMISSIONER, MR BAGGETT. LET'S SAY THAT IF THERE IS NO MOTION OR OF THE MOTION IS A SECONDED WHAT IS THERE THEY CAN COME BACK WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THE NEW PLAN. WELL. TO THE FIRST ONE IS THE FIRST REASON COMING BACK FOR THE SECOND READING IS WHEN YOU GUYS WATCH THE VOTE ON THERE COULD BE CHANGES BY THEN. IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, OKAY? MAYBE WE COULD ASK LIKE TO ASK. ARE WE READY FOR A VOTE? YES, PEOPLE LIKE IDENTIFIED STATEMENT. WE'LL HAVE IT. MADAM MAYOR. THIS WASN'T INSIDE RESTAURANT INDOOR.

THEN THE MUSIC WOULD BE CONTAINED INDOOR WHEN YOU HAVE A RESTAURANT, AND EVERYTHING IS OUTDOOR. THAT MUSIC IS GOING TO TRAVEL. AND NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO, ESPECIALLY SINCE IT'S ON THE WATER IT'S GONNA TRAVEL AND I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST MUSIC. BUT I KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.

THE POLICE ARE GOING TO BE INUNDATED WITH COMPLAINTS. POLICE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO TRY TO RESPOND. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESPOND TO A NOISE COMPLETE. AND SO YOU'RE SETTING YOURSELVES UP.

TO HAVE A BATTLE BETWEEN THIS RESTAURANT. AND THOSE PEOPLE LIVING ON SEVEN I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS. SO THAT'S WHAT I MEANT WAS INDOORS. I WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM THAT I WOULDN'T HAVE MADE THAT CONDITION. I STAND CORRECTED. UM THERE'S NOT A MOTION TO APPROVED. AND UM YOU KNOW, WE'D LIKE TO RESPECTFULLY TABLE THIS ITEM AND, YOU KNOW, BRING IT BACK AFTER YOU KNOW, FOR THEIR DELIBERATION AMONGST OUR TEAM, AND YOU KNOW, COORDINATION WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND. I CAN ALWAYS REQUEST THAT AFTER THE HEARING. OKAY THANK YOU. AND I ALSO WANT TO THINK OF ALL THE CITIZENS ON SEMINOLE STREET FOR COMING TONIGHT. AND THE HOURS YOU'VE SAID HERE AND ALL YOUR LETTERS AND YOUR CONCERNS. WE HEARD THEM. ARE WE GOING TO TRY AGAIN? DO WE HAVE EMOTION. I GUESS WE'RE DONE. POINTS. FIRST HEARING. BILL. AND SO WE SET FOR ANOTHER HEARING. WITHOUT WITHOUT DOING. THIS WILL BE SET FOR A SECOND READING. THIS IS THE FIRST READING SO IT'LL COME BACK FOR A SECOND READING AND THEN YOU VOTE FEBRUARY. RIGHT. WE'RE DRUNK. I UNDERSTAND THAT PROCEDURAL HERE SO WE'RE SAYING THAT THE FIRST READING WAS A NO VOTE, AND THEN THIS IS GOING TO COME BACK FOR A SECOND READING, AND THAT VOTE IS GOING TO CARRY THE DAY. THEY'RE THE FIRST READING VOTE DOESN'T ACTUALLY HAVE ANY BEARING ON THE ORDINANCE. ANYONE INDICATED OF THE SUPPORT FOR, UM LACK OF SUPPORT OF THE BOARD DIDN'T GET EMOTION. DOESN'T STOP THE DUE PROCESS OF THE TWO HEARING PROCESS TO THE APPLICANTS, SO THE APPLICANTS FREE TO RETURN ON WHATEVER DATE IN FEBRUARY. THE HEARING IS, I THINK IT'S FEBRUARY 12. AND PURSUE A VOTE OR PURSUE A CONCLUSION, OR BETWEEN NOW AND FEBRUARY 12TH.

THE APPLICANT COULD REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE APPLICANT WOULD COULD REQUEST TO COULD WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION OR MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE APPLICATION ACCORDINGLY. SO DO WE NEED A REQUEST OF CONTINUOUS TO DATE CERTAIN OR IT'S JUST SECOND READING IS SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY AND SECOND READING IS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED. IF IT'S REQUESTS A CONTINUANCE BETWEEN LET'S SAY TOMORROW YOU CALLED AND SAID THAT I REQUESTED ON FEBRUARY 12TH. THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TO REQUEST OR WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A MOTION TO SCHEDULE IT FOR A DATE CERTAIN OF WHENEVER THAT IS AND IT WOULD BE MOVED TO THE DATE CERTAIN ON FEBRUARY 12TH.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.