[APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
[COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (Non-Agenda Related) (3 Minutes Max.)]
[COMMENTS BY BOARD MEMBERS (Non-Agenda Items)]
[1. PRESENTATION OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2025 (RC): RESOLUTION No. 03-2025 CRA; A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AWARD TO APPLICANTS FROM THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]
[2. DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION - SCOPE OF WORK FOR COMMUNITY VISIONING AND MASTER PLAN FOR THE CRA]
[01:20:59]
YOU KNOW, THAT'S A GOOD IDEA, BUT THERE'S GOING TO BE. MORE THAN PIECEMEALING IT. WHAT I'M
[01:21:06]
SAYING IS, IN THE SAME WAY WE'VE STUDIED TRIANGLE DISTRICT, YOU KNOW, NOT TO THAT LEVEL OF[01:21:11]
DEPTH, BUT SORT OF COLLAGING SOME OF THESE OTHER NATURAL PARKS AND HAVING AN OPPORTUNITY[01:21:16]
THERE TO LEVERAGE IT. WHEN, YOU KNOW, WHEN SOMETHING COMES UP, HEY, WE'VE ALREADY GOT A PARKS[01:21:21]
MASTER PLAN. LET'S LET'S LOOK AT IMPLEMENTING WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE VERSUS PARKS ARE EXPENSIVE[01:21:27]
TO BUILD AND EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN LIKE THE ONE OVER SHOULD BE. IT SHOULD BE[01:21:31]
DISCUSSED. I DON'T WANT TO. I DON'T WANT TO BE TOO NEGATIVE. BUT ONE OF MY REGRETS WAS NOT[01:21:35]
BEING MORE. INVOLVED WITH THE PARK OVER BY THE DOG PARK. YOU KNOW, I FEEL LIKE THAT THAT WAS[01:21:44]
A MISSED OPPORTUNITY. AND THE MORE THE MORE OF A COMPREHENSIVE LOOK WE HAVE AT THIS, YOU KNOW,[01:21:50]
THE TWO ACRES NORTH OF THE BRIDGE, HAVING THAT BE A NATURAL PARK, THAT THESE KINDS OF[01:21:54]
THINGS, IF THERE'S A CACHET OF WHAT WE'VE STUDIED AND LIKE THAT WE CAN PULL FROM WHEN THE NEXT[01:22:00]
PARK HAPPENS, THERE'S A 5050 ACRE PARK ATTACHED TO THAT THAT NOBODY GOES IN BECAUSE YOU CAN'T[01:22:07]
NO YOU CAN'T. THERE'S NO TRAILHEAD ON THAT OTHER SIDE. THAT'S JUST, WELL, THE SCHOOL[01:22:12]
AND THE THING, THERE'S NO REAL THERE'S NO REAL PARKING LOT FOR IT. YOU HAVE TO PARK WHERE THE[01:22:18]
BARK PARK WAS GOING TO GO. RIGHT? YEAH. BUT THESE THAT. IS THERE ANY CONSENSUS WE SHOULD[01:22:24]
LIKE SOME SORT OF. WE SHOULD ADDRESS THAT ISSUE IN DEPTH IN THE FUTURE. SOME. AND THAT'S[01:22:30]
SOMETHING I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE CRA DO. IT'S JUST NOT THE CRA. WOULDN'T YOU WANT IT FOR THE WHOLE CITY? I WOULD LOVE IT CITYWIDE, BUT CRA WOULD BE A GOOD STARTING POINT. YOU EITHER LIKE. NO NO NO NO JUST DOESN'T. JUST AS A JUST BRINGING THAT UP AS A POINT. I WISH WE COULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING COOLER THERE. LET'S LET'S BRING THAT UP IN THE FUTURE AT SOME POINT. BRING IT UP NOW. BRING IT DOWN NOW. IS THERE ANY CONSENSUS THAT WE COULD START TO LOOK AT OUR PARKS IN THE CRA AND WHAT WE COULD DO THERE, AN OPPORTUNITY IN THE FUTURE JUST TO TRY TO GENERATE DIRECTION FOR BESIDES THE 7 MILLION TO GUY DAVIS AND THE 2.5 MILLION WE'RE SPENDING, WE'RE GOING TO SPEND IT. BUT LOOKING AT WHAT'S WHAT'S THERE, WHAT'S AVAILABLE, SOME OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, WHAT THEY'RE DOING, IS THAT A CRA THING OR IS THAT A PARKS DOES IT DOES. MR. MR. CROSS, ANY WAY WE WANT OKAY. I WANT TO HAVE COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION STILL DOES SOME PARK PLANNING. I HAVEN'T GIVEN THEM ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. BUT THERE IS A PLAN THAT WAS DRAWN UP BY THE CRA TO EXTEND SEMINOLE AND OSCEOLA BEYOND OUT TO THE STUART FEED AND BEYOND, DOWN INTO THE PARK AT FLAGLER TO START DEVELOPING. THERE'S A THERE'S A TALK ABOUT A PARK THAT THAT PLAN WAS DRAWN BY THE STUART MAIN STREET AND PRESENTED TO THE CRA. AND THE CRA DIDN'T ADOPT THE PLAN, BUT IT ACTUALLY HAD THE ROAD GOING RIGHT THROUGH THE PARKING LOT OF CITY HALL HERE. AND IT HAD A HOTEL WHERE CITY HALL IS, AND IT HAD AN AMPHITHEATER. IT DIDN'T IT DIDN'T HAVE A HOTEL BECAUSE WE SPECIFICALLY TOOK OUT ANYTHING ON THE CITY HALL, THIS PARCEL, BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT ANYTHING THAT THIS WOULD HAVE TO THERE'D HAVE TO BE A DECISION ABOUT THE ROAD. THE ROAD WAS THERE BECAUSE MULLIGAN'S HAD AGREED TO ALLOW US TO CHANGE THE PARKING, BUT THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE. THAT WAS FROM A PLAN STANDPOINT OF PURE GREEN SPACE. AND THEN THE CITY COMMISSION COULD DECIDE WHAT THEY WANTED TO DO WITH IT. GREEN SPACE WAS ON THIS SIDE OF THE ROAD, BUT THE ROAD CAME DOWN HERE AND THERE WERE TWO STORY BUILDINGS ON THIS SIDE, JUST LIKE IN DOWNTOWN STUART. AGAIN, NOT THAT IT MATTERS, BUT IT WASN'T A THEY WERE ON THE THEY WERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET. THEY WERE OUT OFF OF FLAGLER. THERE'S A PLAN RIGHT THERE. YEAH. THEY'RE OFF THE FLAG RIGHT THERE IT IS. AND LIKE I SAY, THE SPACE WHERE THE CITY HALL WAS, WAS LEFT OPEN ON PURPOSE WHERE IT SAYS PROPOSED HOTEL. YEAH. RIGHT THERE. YEAH.I DON'T KNOW WHERE THAT CAME FROM BECAUSE IT DID NOT THAT WAS NOT IN THAT PLAN BECAUSE I WAS PRESENT AT THE TIME. WE DID ANYWAY. BOARD MEMBER BUTRE NOT DISCUSSING THAT. OKAY. AND THEN THIS WAS HOW ABOUT WE ASK THE VICE MAYOR? HOW ABOUT IF WE ASK STAFF TO GIVE US AN INVENTORY OF ALL THE PARKS IN THE CITY, SPECIFYING WHICH ONES ARE IN THE CRA, THEIR COSTS AND
[01:25:06]
THEIR COSTS TO MAINTAIN AND OPERATE, AND FUTURE PLANS AND FUTURE PLANS. AND THEN WITH THAT INFORMATION, I THINK WE CAN HAVE A MORE FRUITFUL DISCUSSION. WE HAD AN ACTIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD DOING THAT AND HAVE A DAD ON THAT. YES, YES, THAT WOULD BE FANTASTIC. MR. MARTEL, DO WE NEED TO GIVE YOU OR FOR THE CRA FOR THE CRA? OKAY, LET'S START WITH THE CRA THEN. OKAY. I THINK THE DIRECTION IS HEARD AND I'LL WORK WITH THE. DIRECTOR. THANK YOU. A LIST OF CRA. THANK YOU.IT'S ALWAYS GOOD TO HAVE. THANK YOU. HAVING OPERATED IN A COUNTY PARK AND BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS OF THAT, IT'S PARKS ARE EXPENSIVE. YES, $1,000 A YEAR. YEAH, IT'S THAT LITTLE.
BUT OKAY, WE'LL WE'LL TALK ABOUT IT. ANY OTHER DIRECTION YOU WOULD LIKE SPECIFICALLY. NOT NOT FOR THIS ITEM. BUT WE DO HAVE ANOTHER ITEM. OKAY. I'LL WORK WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY. CITY MANAGER TO DO THE ITEM. OKAY. IF YOU COULD PROCEED ON ITEM THREE. THANK YOU AGAIN. SO THIS ITEM IS
[3. DISCUSSION AND DELIBERATION OF THE CRA FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN]
DISCUSSED BY THE CRB BOARD AT THE LAST TWO BOARD MEETINGS. AND BASED ON THE DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING, STAFF CREATED A LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS TO BE CONSIDERED AND PRIORITIZED FOR THE CRA CIP. THIS KIND OF GOES BACK TO COMMISSIONER'S JOB, WHERE SHE STATED THAT WE SHOULD LOOK AT ALL THE PLANS AND PRIORITIZE PROJECTS, SO STAFF DID DO THAT. I LOOKED AT ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND PICKED OUT THE PROJECTS THAT THAT WE COULD PRIORITIZE. AND SO I CATEGORIZED BY ITS LOCATION, WHETHER IT'S IN A SPECIFIC DISTRICT OR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND HOW IT ALIGNS WITH THE CRA VISION AND GOALS. AND IF IT'S CONTINGENT ON ANY OTHER FACTORS. FOR INSTANCE, CITY HALL RELOCATION IS DEPENDENT ON WELLS FARGO MOVING OUT. SO THOSE PROJECTS ARE ALSO IDENTIFIED IN THE LIST. AND THEN WHAT WE DID WAS AND IF IT'S MENTIONED IN ANY STUDIES OR MASTER PLANS, I ALSO LISTED THAT IN THIS EXHIBIT. AND THEN WE I GAVE POINTS TO THESE PROJECTS BASED ON WHETHER THEY WERE IN IN SOME MASTER PLAN, WHETHER IT MEETS THE CRA GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, AND THEN THE CRA, CRB HELPED TO PRIORITIZE THE PROJECTS. HERE'S A SUMMARY OF THE CIP LIST. THE PROJECT LISTED ON THE FIRST SHEET OF THE CIP. THESE ARE ALL ALREADY ONGOING PROJECTS, SO THOSE HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY THE CRA BOARD. HERE'S THE LIST THAT WE NEED TO LOOK AT, WHICH IS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026. IT INCLUDES A STATEMENT ON NEIGHBORHOOD DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS, CRA WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, STREET CANOPY PROGRAM, AND QUIET ZONES. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIZING STATEMENT NEIGHBORHOOD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. IT MAKES SENSE. WE RECEIVED A GRANT FOR THAT PROJECT FROM DEP FOR $1.6 MILLION. SO THAT IS BEING PRIORITIZED FOR NEXT YEAR. WE ALSO HELD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING LAST WEEK TO GET FEEDBACK AND DISCUSS ANY DRAINAGE, SIDEWALK, AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD SO THAT WILL COME BEFORE THE BOARD AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, HOW THEY WANT TO MOVE FORWARD. BUT WE DO BELIEVE THAT COMBINING THE DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE MORE COST EFFICIENT, AND IT WOULD MINIMIZE ANY DISRUPTION. AND THEN IN 2027, WE ANTICIPATE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DIXIE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS. WE RECEIVED A GRANT FOR THAT. SO THAT'S THAT'S PRIORITIZED FOR 2027. AND THEN LOOKING FORWARD, THE CRB DID RECOMMEND TO DO OSCEOLA STREET EXTENSION. BUT AGAIN THAT IS CONTINGENT ON RELOCATING THE CITY HALL. BUT THEY DID RECOMMEND TO PRIORITIZE THAT PROJECT. IN 2027. THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE THAT'S IDENTIFIED IN THE MASTER PLAN I BUDGETED THAT FOR 2728. WE'LL SEE GRANTS FOR THAT PROJECT, AND IT LINES UP WITH THE MLK STREETSCAPE PROJECT. SO IT WOULD BE GOOD TO DO THOSE PROJECTS. AT THE SAME TIME. THE DESIGN OF TRIANGLE DISTRICT STREETSCAPE PROJECTS AND STREETSCAPE PROJECT IS JUST IT'S PRIORITIZED FOR 2027 AND ONWARDS. THE 10TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER REHAB, WHICH WAS JUST MENTIONED SOON AFTER THE GUY DAVIS PARK IS DONE. YOU KNOW, WE'LL NEED TO UPDATE THAT BUILDING. SO THAT'S PRIORITIZED FOR 2028. SO STAFF IS LOOKING FOR CRA'S RECOMMENDATION ON HOW TO PRIORITIZE THE PROJECTS OR IF THE BOARD AGREES WITH THIS PRIORITIZATION THAT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE CRB. AS ANY OF THE BOARD MEMBERS HAVE ANY[01:30:02]
QUESTIONS OF PAUL. VICE CHAIR COLLINS. SO I'D GIVEN YOU MY SHORT LIST. THE ONLY AUDIBLE WOULD BE GUY DAVIS. IF MIKE IS SAYING GUY DAVIS IS GOING TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE, THAT SHOULD BE OUR PRIORITY IS IF WE NEED TO PUSH OFF SOME OF THESE OTHER PROJECTS. TO BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE WE CAN COMPLETE GUIDE. DAVIS, THE SKATEBOARD SKATE PARKS FUNDED, I KNOW, BUT LIKE THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OR STREETSCAPING MLK, YOU KNOW, THESE KIND OF PROJECTS OVER THERE. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE GUY DAVIS GETS DONE FIRST WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDATION. STILLMAN.DRAINAGE IS A SMALLER THING, AND WE GOT THE GRANT FOR THAT. SO IT'S JUST IF YOU CAN GET THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALL TO COALESCE AROUND ONE VISION. I AGREE WITH WHERE THEY WANT THE SIDEWALKS.
$4 MILLION IS NOT VERY. WE TALKED ABOUT THAT DURING THE REGULAR MEETING. RIGHT. OKAY.
YEAH. HOW HOW WAS THE MEETING? YOU KNOW, IT WAS OVERALL IT WAS PRETTY GOOD. YOU KNOW, THERE WAS STILL SOME PUSHBACK ON WHERE THEY WANT THE SIDEWALK. SO WE'LL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THEM. IT WE MIGHT CONSIDER MOVING THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE ON CORTEZ BECAUSE IT IMPACTS LESS PROPERTIES COMPARED TO THE EAST SIDE. SO WE'LL LOOK AT THAT. AND WE DID RECEIVE SOME EMAILS AFTER THE MEETING STATING THAT THEY PREFER TO HAVE A SIDEWALK. SO EVEN IF THEY HAVE TO PUT IT ON THE WEST SIDE THEY WOULD SUPPORT THAT. SO WE'LL HAVE ONE MORE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. THEY DEFINITELY DON'T WANT SIDEWALK ON FIFTH STREET ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE. THEY WANT US TO KEEP IT ON THE COMMERCIAL SIDE. AND WE AGREE WITH THAT SO THAT THAT'S NOT AN ISSUE. SO WE'LL HAVE ONE MORE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING BEFORE I BRING THIS BEFORE THE BOARD, BECAUSE I WANT CONSENSUS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD BEFORE I BRING ANYTHING TO THE IT'S SAFE TO SAY THEY WERE NOT AS ADAMANT IN THEIR OPPOSITION AS KNOW IF THEY DON'T WANT IT. WE DON'T WANT TO DO IT. RIGHT.
EXACTLY. GOOD. AND DOES THE BOARD AGREE WITH THE QUIET ZONES? THAT IS SOMETHING THAT'S PRIORITIZED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR FOR 2026. FROM A FROM A STANDPOINT OF QUIET ZONES, I, I HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSING IT AS QUIET ZONES AT ALL. I THINK BACK TO WHAT MR. WAS SAYING. WE'VE CONSULTED AND HIRED CAP TECH AND HAD THEM DOING SOME DESIGNS, AND WE'VE HAD MULTIPLE MEETINGS WITH THE FEDERAL RAIL ADMINISTRATION AS IT RELATES TO SAFETY. THE QUIET ZONES MAY OR MAY NOT QUALIFY UNDER THE CITY FOR QUIET ZONES. IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR QUIET ZONES. ORIGINALLY, WE NEEDED TO APPLY UNDER THE COUNTY. THE COUNTY HAS CHOSEN NOT TO APPLY FOR QUIET ZONES. MY FOCUS WOULD BE FOR THE CITY TO CONTINUE WORKING ON THE SAFETY OF THOSE INTERSECTIONS. AT SUCH TIME AS WE GET SOME OF THESE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED, IT DOES APPEAR THAT THEY MAY QUALIFY. FOR QUIET ZONES, BUT RECOGNIZE THAT WHEN THE BOARD VOTES TO MAKE THOSE A QUIET ZONE, THE BOARD IS VOTING TO REMOVE SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. SO AT WHAT LEVEL OF SAFETY DO YOU WANT THAT INTERSECTION BEFORE YOU START REMOVING SAFETY FROM THE INTERSECTION? RIGHT. SO FOR NOW, MY FOCUS WOULD BE THAT WE NOT FOCUS ON THE QUIET ZONE PART OF IT. WE FOCUS DIRECTLY ON THE SAFETY TO MAKE THIS A SAFE. SAILFISH FERN FLORIDA SAILFISH, MLK, YOU KNOW ALL FIVE OF THEM AND CONFUSION CORNER MAKE THEM SAFE FOR PASSAGE. AND THEN ONCE THEY'RE SAFE, EVALUATE WHETHER THAT QUALIFIES FOR QUIET ZONES AND ADDRESS IT FROM THERE. MIKE, I THOUGHT THAT I THOUGHT THAT THAT'S A POINT SYSTEM. AND IF YOU TAKE SOMETHING AWAY, YOU HAVE TO PUT SOMETHING IN THAT PRODUCES MORE POINTS. YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO FOR THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF POINTS, WHICH GETS YOU THE COMPLETE QUIET ZONE. NO, NO BELLS, NO WHISTLES. BUT IF YOU TAKE AWAY SOMETHING, YOU HAVE TO PUT SOMETHING BACK TO QUALIFY AS WHAT? MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN I WENT THROUGH IT BEFORE. SO WHEN I WAS IN COLLEGE, I USED TO SAY, ALL I HAVE TO DO IS GET AN 80 TO GET A B, BUT IN THIS INSTANCE I NEED A 99. BECAUSE IF SOMEBODY DIES BECAUSE I ACCEPTED AN 80, YEAH, IT DOESN'T GET IT. I MEAN, LIKE THAT DOESN'T WORK. SO YEAH, WE COULD DO A COUPLE OF THINGS TO MAYBE QUALIFY FOR A QUIET ZONE AND LEAVE IT DANGEROUS, KNOW THAT. BUT BUT MY POINT WAS THAT THAT TO GET THE QUIET ZONE AT THE MAXIMUM LEVEL, YOU HAVE TO BASICALLY HARDEN THAT CROSSING SO THAT YOU CAN'T GET INTO THAT CROSSING. AND THAT'S THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. I MEAN, AT LEAST WHEN I LOOKED AT IT BEFORE I SEALED CORRIDOR IS WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. THAT WOULD HAVE A CURB GOING DOWN WHETHER IT'S EAST, WEST, NORTH, SOUTH DOESN'T MATTER. BUT SO THAT A CAR CAN'T CHANGE LANES TO GO
[01:35:03]
AROUND A GATE. SO IF YOU USE FERN, FOR EXAMPLE, FERN RUNS PERPENDICULAR OR THE RAILROAD TRACK RUNS PERPENDICULAR TO DIXIE HIGHWAY. SO WHERE FERN COMES OUT, THE 100 FOOT MEDIAN THAT WOULD NEED TO COME OUT OF THE MIDDLE OF THE TRACKS WOULD GO ALL THE WAY ACROSS DIXIE HIGHWAY, AND WOULD MAKE IT SO THAT PEOPLE COULDN'T USE DIXIE ANYMORE. SO YOU MAY NOT GET A COMPLETELY SEALED CORRIDOR. AND IN THE INSTANCE OF CONFUSION CORNER, WE HAVE MULTIPLE STREETS CONNECTING INTO THIS ROAD, BUT WE NEED TO ADDRESS THE LEFT TURN LANE. WE NEED TO ADD TWO OR I THINK RIGHT NOW IT'S THREE MORE GATES THAT OPEN AND CLOSE TO COMPLETELY CLOSE IT IN. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO ISSUES OF WHEN THE GATES LIFT UP, WHEN PEOPLE COME IN FROM COLORADO, GO TO TURN RIGHT ON EAST OCEAN. IF THOSE PEDESTRIANS ARE WALKING ACROSS ON EAST OCEAN AS WELL, PEOPLE DON'T SEE THEM. AND THEN THERE'S THE PART OF PEOPLE COMING OUT OF DOWNTOWN, WHETHER THEY'RE GOING RIGHT ON DIXIE OR WHETHER THEY'RE GOING STRAIGHT ON COLORADO, AND THE PEOPLE TURNING LEFT OFF OF COLORADO TO GO ONTO DIXIE. AND WHETHER THAT SHOULD BE A STOP SIGN, A YIELD SIGN, A TRAFFIC LIGHT, A GATE, OR OTHER POTENTIAL MATTERS. AND THOSE ARE JUST AND WE DO HAVE THOSE PRESENTATIONS OR NOT PRESENTATIONS, BUT DESIGNS IN THE WORKS. AND WE WILL BRING THOSE BACK TO YOU. BUT I WOULD JUST I WOULD THINK OF IT MORE AS A BOARD IN TERMS OF SAFETY RATHER THAN OF WHAT'S THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO MAKE A HORN NOT GO OFF SO THAT WE CAN ENSURE THAT NOBODY GETS HURT? THANK YOU. JEFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. I HAVE DIRECTION, OKAY. AND I'M GLAD TO SEE THE MONEY IN THERE FOR THE TREE CANOPY ENHANCEMENTS. LET'S MAKE SURE WE SPEND THAT EVERY YEAR. IS THAT IT? YEP. SEE NO OTHER ITEMS* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.