[APPROVAL OF AGENDA ]
[00:00:35]
GIRL. CAN I GET A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA? MOVE. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA IS PUBLISHED. I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA BY BOARD MEMBER. CLERK. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER. JOB. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS MOTION? SEEING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SEEING NONE. THE
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES ]
MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. CAN I GET A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES? I THINK THERE WERE[COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (Non-Agenda Related) ]
IN THE LAST JUST FROM THE LAST BOARD MEETING. OKAY. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON NON AGENDA ITEMS. I HAVE NO COMMENT. SEEING NONE. COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS ON NON AGENDA ITEMS. IF THERE ARE ANY YES. BOARD MEMBER. CLARK. YES THIS IS A CRA MEETING. I JUST I WAS RECENTLY APPOINTED TO THE STUART MAIN STREET WHICH WORKS ALONG WITH THE CRA ON SOME PROJECTS AND THAT WAS. I GUESS VERY. I WAS GLAD THAT I ACTUALLY WENT TO THE THAT PARTICULAR MEETING AND SAW THE MAKEUP OF THEIR, HOW THEIR, THEIR CURRENT BOARD MEMBERSHIP IS WORKING AND THE THINGS THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON AND. I'M EXCITED TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH THE STUART MAIN STREET. ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS ON NON AGENDA ITEMS? NO. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK COMMISSIONER CLARK FOR TAKING ON THAT ROLE. IT IS IMPORTANT.[1. AWARD OF APPLICATIONS FOR THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 2026 (RC): RESOLUTION No. 03-2026 CRA; A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AWARD TO APPLICANTS FROM THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.]
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR FIRST ACTION ITEM FOR THE AWARD OF APPLICATIONS FOR THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026.LEE. RESOLUTION NUMBER 03-2026. CRAA RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AWARD TO APPLICANTS FROM THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IS THERE A PRESENTATION JORDAN FOLLOWED? YES, SIR. GOOD AFTERNOON. CRA CRA BOARD MEMBERS JORDAN PINKSTON, CRA PROGRAM MANAGER. FOR THE RECORD, THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM IS AN INCENTIVE PROGRAM DESIGNED TO ENCOURAGE VISIBLE EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ENCOURAGE PRIVATE INVESTMENT WITHIN THE CRA. THE PROGRAM PROVIDES REIMBURSEMENT GRANT OF UP TO $10,000 IN PUBLIC FUNDS PER PROPERTY, TO MATCH PRIVATE FUNDS TO PAY FOR DESIGN AND COMPLETION OF PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS. FUNDS ARE APPROPRIATED ANNUALLY BY THE CRA, AND THE PROJECTS ARE EVALUATED BASED ON SOME CRITERIA, INCLUDING OVERALL VISUAL IMPACT OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS PART OF A LARGER EXTERIOR OR INTERIOR IMPROVEMENT. THE PROJECT RELATES TO URBAN AND STREET AND PROVIDES PEDESTRIAN WALKABILITY IN A LOCATION WITH HIGH TRAFFIC OR HIGH VISIBILITY. PRIVATE INVESTMENT TO GRANT REQUEST RATIO AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT HELP PRESERVE HISTORIC BUILDINGS. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GRANT WAS LAUNCHED IN 2009 TO ENCOURAGE VISIBLE EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS TO COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN THE CRA. THE GRANT PROGRAM PROVIDED A MATCHING GRANT OF ONLY UP TO 4000 PER PROPERTY AT THAT TIME.
SINCE THEN, THE PROGRAM WAS REVISED IN 2016 2017 AND RENAMED THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT GRANT PROGRAM, ALSO KNOWN AS BURP, WHICH OFFERS BUSINESS OWNERS MATCHING GRANTS OF UP TO $10,000 FOR EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS. AND THROUGHOUT THE YEARS, THE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS HAVE CHANGED. AIM AND AIM TO ASSIST PROPERTY OWNERS TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IMPROVE OVERALL PROPERTY APPEARANCES. THE PROGRAM HAS OFFERED FINANCIAL RELIEF TO LOCAL BUSINESSES FOR IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING CURB STOPS, RESURFACING SIGNAGE, PAINT WINDOWS, FENCES, BENCHES, ROOFS, LANDSCAPING AND MORE. TO DATE, THE PROGRAM HAS AWARDED 61 BUSINESSES AND THE CRA'S INVESTMENT OF 444,000 LEVERAGED APPROXIMATELY 2 MILLION IN PRIVATE INVESTMENT, GENERATING
[00:05:02]
A TOTAL PROJECT VALUE OF 2.44 MILLION. THE PROGRAM AIMS TO REDUCE BLIGHT AND ENHANCE BUILDING FACADES, POSITIVELY AFFECTING PROPERTY VALUES AND THE AREA'S APPEAL. AND AS ALWAYS, THE CRA DOES PUBLIC OUTREACH TO ENCOURAGES THE BUSINESSES TO APPLY FOR THIS PROGRAM. EVERY YEAR, THE CRA RECEIVES SIX APPLICATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FUNDING. ONE OF THOSE APPLICATIONS WAS INELIGIBLE. THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WILL INCLUDE PARKING LOT RESURFACING, IMPACT WINDOWS PAINTING AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS. AND AT THIS TIME, IT'S UP TO THE BOARD'S DISCRETION. IF THEY WOULD LIKE ME TO DO EACH INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION, OR IF YOU'D JUST LIKE ME TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THEM AND VOTE AT THE END, WHICH ONE WAS INELIGIBLE? ONE OF THESE APPLICANTS? NO, NONE OF THE ONES THAT YOU WILL SEE TODAY. IT WAS THE ESPLANADE BUILDING. THEY WERE NOT IN COMPLIANCE TO THEIR PED SO THEY WERE INELIGIBLE. OKAY. DOES THE BOARD HAVE A PREFERENCE ON HOW WE PRESENT IT? IF IT'S ONE AT A TIME OR AND YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FOR THE VOTE OR. YEAH, IF YOU WANTED TO MAKE AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION ON EACH APPLICATION, WE AT THE END OR AFTER I PRESENT EACH ONE INDIVIDUALLY. RIGHT. YEAH. SO I THINK WHAT SHE'S SAYING IS WE HAVE WHAT. SORRY, FIVE FIVE, FIVE TOTAL APPLICANTS. YOU CAN SHE CAN DO A PRESENTATION ON EACH ONE OF THEM. AND YOU GUYS CAN DISCUSS THEM AND VOTE SEPARATELY. OR YOU CAN WAIT TILL THE END. AND YOU KNOW, YOU CAN DISTINGUISH THEM AT THE END OR VOTE FOR ALL OR DENY ALL. IT'S I'M FINE WAITING TILL THE END. JUST JUST TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION. PLEASE. OKAY. YEAH. NO PROBLEM. SO OUR FIRST APPLICATION IS THE AVONLEA COMMERCE CENTER, LOCATED AT 429 NORTHEAST BAKER ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING GRANT ASSISTANCE TO ENHANCE CURB APPEAL AND FUNCTIONALITY OF THEIR PROPERTY BY PAINTING THE EXTERIOR BUILDING AND ADDING WAYFINDING SIGNS. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE $31,000. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS APPLICANT IS A RETURNING APPLICATION OR I'M SORRY, APPLICANT IS PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED FUNDING IN 2023 FOR PAVERS, BENCHES AND BIKE RACKS, AND THEN IN 2025 TO REPLACE AWNINGS ON THE SPECIFIED BUILDINGS. THE PROPERTY IS NOT FINISHED THE FISCAL 2025 UPGRADES YET, BUT THEY'RE INTENDING TO USE THE SCAFFOLDING FOR BOTH THE AWNING REPLACEMENT AND THE UPCOMING PAINTING IMPROVEMENTS TO SAVE ON COSTS. THE EXTERIOR CURRENTLY HAS CRACKS AND REQUIRES PRESSURE CLEANING, CAULKING, AND PAINTING. ADDITIONALLY, THE BUILDINGS DO NOT HAVE DISTINCT ADDRESSES, SO WAYFINDING SIGNS AND BUILDING NUMBERS WILL BE INSTALLED TO HELP PREVENT CONFUSION FOR THE VISITORS. ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT HAVE A VISUAL, URBAN, STREET AND ECONOMIC IMPACT, AND THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR WILL BE ABOUT 31,000, WITH A GRANT MATCH OF 10,000. OVERALL, THE APPLICANT WILL INVEST $61,397, WITH A CRA INVESTMENT OF $23,160 THROUGH THIS PROGRAM. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND THE NEXT APPLICATION IS THE GEARY LAW BUILDING, LOCATED AT 27 SOUTHEAST OCEAN BOULEVARD. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING GRANT ASSISTANCE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO ENHANCE CURB APPEAL AND FUNCTIONALITY AND SAFETY WITH THE PAVING AND RESTRIPING OF THEIR PARKING LOT. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE 24,500. THE CURRENT PARKING LOT IS CRACKING, UNBALANCED AND NEEDS TO BE RESTRIPED, AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE CAUSING TRIP HAZARDS AND CAUSE STANDING WATER TO PUDDLE IN THOSE IN THOSE HOLES, DURING STORMS. PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS ENCOMPASS MILLING, ATTACKING FOR THE RESTORATION OF DAMAGED SECTIONS.INSTALLATION OF NEW ASPHALT, RESTRIPING OF PARKING SPACES AND THE REPLACEMENT OF BUMPERS.
IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT HAVE A VERSION OF VISUAL, URBAN, STREET, ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY IMPACT. THE PROPERTY FRONTS OCEAN BOULEVARD, SO IT WILL SERVE AS A CATALYST FOR REDEVELOPMENT IN THAT IN THAT STRETCH OF ROAD AND THE TOTAL INVESTMENT IMPROVEMENT COSTS WILL BE ABOUT 24,500 WITH A GRANT MATCH OF 10,000. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AS WELL. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, SURE, THE TOTAL PROJECT COST THERE, I BELIEVE WAS 24,500. CORRECT. HE IS NOT SPENDING 24,500. IN ADDITION TO THE TEN WE'RE PROVIDING, HE SPENDS 245. WE'RE WE'RE THAT'S WE'RE PROVIDING HIM WITH TEN OF THAT. WE WILL REIMBURSE HIM TEN OF THAT. RIGHT. SO HE DOES SPEND THAT UP FRONT. YES. YES. OKAY. THE NEXT APPLICATION IS GEIGER DOWNTOWN LLC, WHICH INCLUDES MULTIPLE BUSINESSES IN OUR HISTORIC DOWNTOWN CENTER, INCLUDING RIVERWALK CAFE SPRITZ, BLACK MARLIN, GYPSY COTTAGE GIRLS DOWNTOWN, THE GAFFORD TOOTSIES, AND RARE EARTH GALLERY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING GRANT ASSISTANCE FOR EXTERIOR PAINTING TO ALL THE BUSINESSES AND AWNING REPLACEMENTS TO SPRITZ. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE ABOUT $44,000. THE BUSINESSES TARGETED FOR THIS
[00:10:05]
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT HAVE WORN FACADES, AND THEIR BUILDINGS WOULD BENEFIT FROM A THOROUGH PRESSURE WASH AND FRESH PAINT FOR MAINTENANCE. ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT HAVE THE VISUAL, URBAN, STREET, ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY IMPACT. THE PROPERTY IS IN THE NEWLY DEEMED HISTORIC DOWNTOWN DISTRICT AND IS HIGHLY VISIBLE. THESE IMPROVEMENTS ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE AND HARMONIZE WITH THE VIBRANT HISTORIC CONTEXT OF DOWNTOWN. THE PROPERTY IS ALSO IN THE CENTER OF THE CRA DOWNTOWN UNDERGROUNDING SEMINOLE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, MAKING IT A CATALYST FOR OTHER DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES TO FOLLOW SUIT. THE TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE ABOUT 44,000 WITH A GRANT MATCH OF 10,000. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND THEN KAISER DERMATOLOGY, LOCATED AT 301 SOUTHWEST OSCEOLA STREET. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING GRANT ASSISTANCE TO BOOST CURB APPEAL THROUGH UPGRADED LANDSCAPING AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARKING LOT. TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COSTS WILL BE ABOUT $5,660. PARKING LOT UPGRADES WILL COVER PAVERS, RESTRIPING OF THE PARKING STALLS, NEW SIGNS AND BUMPERS, AND THEN THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE FEATURES WILL BE RESTORED. THE BANYAN TREE OVER OSCEOLA STREET WILL BE TRIMMED, AND A NEW TRELLIS WILL BE INSTALLED FOR THE WALKWAY LEADING TO THE PROPERTY. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROVIDE THE VISUAL, ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY BENEFITS. THE PROJECT INCREASES SAFETY, ACCESSIBILITY, VISUAL APPEAL TO DOWNTOWN BY IMPROVING THE ADA COMPLIANCE, REMOVING HAZARDS, AND UPGRADING STREETSCAPE FEATURES, SUPPORTING CRA REVITALIZATION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE ABOUT 5066 $5,660, WITH A GRANT MATCH OF $2,830. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND THEN THE LAST APPLICATIONS, THE OWL HOUSE PROPERTIES LOCATED. OH I'M SORRY, OWL HOUSE PROPERTIES INCLUDES OWL HOUSE, PART OF THE OLD COLORADO INN AND NAPOLEON ORTHODONTICS, AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING GRANT ASSISTANCE FOR INSTALLING IMPACT WINDOWS TO THE HISTORIC OWL HOUSE AND THEN MAKING PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS TO NEPALI ORTHODONTICS. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE ABOUT $51,925. THE OWL HOUSE IS A HISTORIC DOWNTOWN BUILDING AND WILL HAVE 21 WINDOWS AND TWO DOORS, REPLACED WITH HURRICANE IMPACT VERSIONS TO ENHANCE ITS INTEGRITY, AND THE IMPACT GLASS WILL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS PROTECTION AGAINST THE SEVERE STORMS THAT WE HAVE HERE IN FLORIDA. THE CURRENT PARKING LOT AT NEPALI ORTHODONTICS CRACKING AND BALANCING NEEDS TO BE RESTRIPED.AND SO THOSE PLANNED ENHANCEMENTS ENCOMPASS MILLING, TACKING FOR RESTORATION, DAMAGED SECTIONS, AND INSTALLATION OF NEW ASPHALT. ALSO, THE REPLACEMENT OF THE BUMPERS. SO THE APPLICANTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WILL AFFECT THE AREA'S APPEARANCE.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT I'M SORRY, URBAN ENVIRONMENT. AND THE PROPERTY IS SITUATED RIGHT NEXT TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT ALONG COLORADO AVENUE, WHICH IS PART OF THE SERIES ONGOING UNDERGROUND AND STREETSCAPE PROJECT, AND THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST WILL BE ABOUT $51,925, WITH A GRANT MATCH OF $10,000, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THE TOTAL GETTING 21 WINDOWS STORM WINDOWS FOR ONLY $51,000. WOW, THAT'S A GOOD DEAL. IT SEEMS. THAT VENDOR WITH US. I'M SURE HE WILL. SO AS YOU CAN SEE THAT THE TOTAL GRANT MATCH AMOUNT THAT QUALIFIES FOR FUNDING IS $42,830. BETWEEN ALL THE APPLICATIONS, STAFF IS SEEKING A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 03-2026 CRA, AUTHORIZING THE AWARD AMOUNT FOR EACH APPLICATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026 GRANT CYCLE. DO ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBERS HAVE ANY COMMENTS FOR APPLICANTS OR STAFF? YES, BOARD MEMBER, I HAVE A QUESTION AND IT'S NOT IN REGARDS TO THIS, BUT DID YOU SAY THAT THE FIRE IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION? THAT PROJECT IS THAT IN THE BEGINNING? SO, NO, THIS PARTICULAR SECTION OR BUSINESS COMMERCE OF AVONLEA, THEY APPLIED FOR THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT IN 2025 AS WELL. AND THEY'VE HELD OFF ON INSTALLING THE AWNINGS, WHICH WERE APPROVED FOR LAST GRANT CYCLE BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO APPLY FOR THIS ONE FOR THE PAINT, BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT THAT IT COST. AND THEY WANTED TO USE THE SAME SCAFFOLDING. SO YEAH, TO SAVE ON TO NOT HAVE TO PAY, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THE COST, LIKE $5,000 EACH TIME FOR THE SCAFFOLDING. SO NO, THEY HAVE NOT COMPLETED FISCAL YEAR 2025 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION YET. OKAY, I JUST MISUNDERSTOOD BECAUSE THE QUESTION NOW IS FOR PHENOL BECAUSE WE HAD SOMETHING LIKE MAYBE FIVE, SIX MONTHS AGO, WHICH WAS AT 400 SOUTHEAST OSCEOLA, THEY WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF DOING. PROJECTS AND THEY WEREN'T ELIGIBLE FOR THE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT. SO I
[00:15:01]
JUST WAS WONDERING WHEN YOU MENTIONED THAT AVONLEA WAS STILL BUT YOU WERE REALLY TALKING ABOUT THEY HADN'T COMPLETED WHAT WAS FROM 2025? YEAH, I WAS SPECIFICALLY TALKING ABOUT THIS GRANT THAT THEY APPLIED FOR. IS THAT ALL YOUR COMMENTS? OH, YES. I'M SORRY, THAT'S BOARD MEMBER CLARK. OKAY. SO. THIS IS AN OVERALL QUESTION. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE THE BIR, BUT THE THE 10,000. AND AT SOME POINT WE HADN'T HAD TOO MANY PEOPLE COME IN. AND THEN NOW WE HAVE MORE PEOPLE COMING IN. BUT I SEEM TO REMEMBER ONE TIME THERE WAS A PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF GEORGIA AND EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD, AND I THOUGHT THAT SOMEHOW THEY HAD RECEIVED LIKE $30,000 OR SOMETHING. IT WAS QUITE A FEW YEARS AGO. IT COULD HAVE BEEN LIKE 2016 OR 17, BUT IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN COMBINED WITH SOMETHING ELSE. YEAH. I'M SORRY. I, I'M NOT SURE I KNOW THAT THIS PROGRAM, THE MAX IT'S EVER BEEN, HAS BEEN THE TEN 000.BUT I KNOW THAT MAYBE THEY DID IT IN CONJUNCTION WITH COMBINED WITH WITH WITH WITH WITH SOMETHING ELSE. BUT MY ISSUE IS IF THESE WORK OUT AND IF WE DO APPROVE ANY OF THESE THAT ARE YOU HEARING FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE MAKING THESE APPLICATIONS THAT THEY. THEY WISH THAT THE PROGRAM HAD MORE FUNDS? I MEAN, OF COURSE, EACH APPLICATION WOULD LIKE TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, SOME ADDITIONAL FUNDING. I MEAN, WE CAN ALWAYS REVISIT THAT. THERE ARE OTHER PROGRAMS THAT WE'VE DONE THIS BEFORE WHERE WE'VE ANALYZED THE, YOU KNOW, THE WHOLE PROCESS OF THE PROGRAM AND, AND WHAT IT ENTAILS. BUT THERE ARE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS. I EVEN THINK THAT THE COUNTY DOES LIKE AN 80/20 MATCH INSTEAD. AND THAT MIGHT INCENTIVIZE SOME OF THE SMALLER BUSINESSES THAT MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO REACH THE 50/50 MATCH TO APPLY. YEAH. SO.
THAT'S WHAT AND I THINK THAT AGAIN, THAT'S FOR ANOTHER DAY. BUT I ACTUALLY LIKE THE NATURE OF ALL THESE APPLICATIONS. AND THEY'RE MOSTLY RIGHT IN THE HEART OF OUR DOWNTOWN. THE AVONLEA IS OVER THE BRIDGE. AND THEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH WITH WHAT I'M SAYING, THE FACT THAT SOMETHING LIKE AVONLEA, THIS IS THEIR THIRD TIME NOW. AND SO WE KNOW THAT PEOPLE ARE MAKING USE OF IT AND THEY HAVE DIFFERENT STAGES OR DIFFERENT THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING. AND I THINK I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING. SO THAT JUST SPEAKS TO THE NEED FOR HAVING THIS RELATIONSHIP.
AND THEN I WANTED TO SAY THIS, EVEN WHEN YOU WERE VERY FIRST SPEAKING, AND IT'S NOT IN THIS PAPERWORK, BUT WHEN YOU SAID THE WORDS ON THE RECORD, YOU SAID PRIVATE, PRIVATE INVESTMENT. AND I THINK PEOPLE NEED TO REALIZE THAT THE, THE OWNERS, THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS, AND WE'RE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AND WE WORK HARD TO GET THESE THINGS AND TO GET THIS AS A PART OF OUR WAY OF LIFE, KNOWING THAT WE'RE WORKING TOGETHER ON THIS.
AND I THINK IT'S SO IMPORTANT THAT YOU DID USE THE WORD PRIVATE. AND IT'S IT'S A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. AND WE HAVE GOOD PARTNERS WHO'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE. LIKE I SAID, I DON'T THINK THE OWL HOUSE ITSELF HAS BEEN HERE BEFORE, BUT I KNOW THAT THEIR PROPERTIES, PROBABLY SAME OWNERSHIP THAT HAVE. AND IT HAS JUST TRANSFORMED. IT'S TRANSFORMATIVE. THE LITTLE BIT THAT THE CRA DOES IS THE THE TEN ZERO ZERO $0 OR WHETHER IT'S $3,000 FOR MURAL, THOSE THINGS ARE TRANSFORMATIVE, AND THEY ADD TO OUR SENSE OF PLACE IN THE CITY. AND I THINK IT'S JUST A GOOD USE. AND IT'S THIS IS A VERY WELL COORDINATED PROGRAM. AND I JUST THINK AS WE GO THROUGH AND VOTE ON, ON EACH ONE OF THESE APPLICATIONS, I DON'T KNOW IF, IF YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANTS, IF ANY OF THEM WANT TO SAY ANYTHING. BUT I, I THINK THAT I THINK IT'S, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S, THIS IS, THIS IS JUST GREAT TO SEE WHAT, WHAT THIS, THIS MONEY WILL BE VERY TRANSFORMATIVE IN OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? BOARD MEMBER. AND THIS IS ACTUALLY NOTHING TO DO. WELL, IT DOES HAVE TO DO WITH THIS PROGRAM. AND I'VE MENTIONED IT BEFORE.
I'D LIKE TO SEE THE CRA DO NOT SO MUCH A MATCH, BUT FOR SMALLER BUSINESSES THAT DON'T HAVE 20 AND $30,000 TO LAY OUT, BUT THEY DO NEED TO IMPROVE A LITTLE BIT OF THEIR PROPERTY.
SO MAYBE WE HAVE A SMALL GIFT PROGRAM, WHATEVER. IT WOULDN'T BE A REIMBURSEMENT. IT WOULD BE A GRANT OF $5,000 GRANT HELPING SMALL, REALLY SMALL BUSINESSES TO DO, YOU KNOW, MINOR THINGS
[00:20:07]
THAT THEY NEED TO DO. AND THEY DON'T HAVE 20 OR $30,000 TO LAY OUT WAITING FOR A $10,000 REIMBURSEMENT. SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT GETS ON THERE. I'VE TALKED ABOUT IT BEFORE. I'D LIKE TO SEE THE CRA WORKING ON SOMETHING LIKE THAT FOR SMALLER BUSINESSES. OH IT'S BACK. YEAH.YEAH. WE CAN DEFINITELY LOOK AT OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, SEE IF THEY HAVE SOME SIMILAR PROGRAM TO THAT AND I'D APPRECIATE IT. I HAVE MENTIONED WE'LL JUST NEED TO DO SOME RESEARCH. AND WHAT IS SMALL BUSINESS CONSIST OF NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES. LIKE, YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO HAVE SOME SORT OF CRITERIA, RIGHT, FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. SO WE'LL DO SOME RESEARCH AND COME BACK TO YOU. THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, MY SUGGESTION FOR THAT MAYBE BOARD MEMBER IS CURRENTLY WE HAVE IT AS A MATCHING FOR 50. IT'S 5000 PER FISCAL YEAR. CORRECT. WE HAVE TWO TWO APPLICANTS THAT ARE NOT FIRST TIME APPLICANTS. SO YOU COULD ALWAYS SPLIT IT MAYBE AND HAVE 25,000 TOWARDS MATCHING AND 25,000 TOWARDS NON MATCHING OR EVEN HAVING IT WHERE YOU CAN ONLY APPLY FOR THIS PROGRAM ONCE. WELL YEAH, WE COULD HAVE SOME CRITERIA THAT WOULD BE GREAT. I MEAN, I THINK THAT THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE WILL BE LOOKING INTO IS WHAT, WHAT DO OTHER MUNICIPALITIES DO OF OUR SIZE? AND TO HELP THIS SMALL MOM AND POP, YOU KNOW, WHERE THIS MAY BE. THE ONLY PEOPLE WORKING THERE ARE MOM AND POP. YOU KNOW, THEY'RE NOT EMPLOYING A LOT OF PEOPLE, BUT THEY STILL HAVE A BUSINESS THAT THEY'D LIKE TO KEEP GOING. I HAVE A QUESTION THOUGH, JORDAN. I KNOW YOU SAID AVONLEA. THEY'VE THEY'VE APPLIED ALREADY.
IS THIS THE SECOND TIME, THEN THIRD, THIRD TIME. AND DID THEY COMPLETE THE FIRST ONE? AND JUST THE SECOND ONE? THEY'RE TRYING TO LIKE CATEGORIZE IT FROM TWO FISCAL YEARS INTO ONE, BUT THEY JUST HAVEN'T BEEN REIMBURSED FROM THE LAST ONE. YEAH. CORRECT. SO WE CREATED A PURCHASE LIKE THIS BEHIND THE SCENES, BUT WE THE FUNDS FROM 2025 ARE STILL ALLOCATED FROM 2025 FOR THEM. SO THEY HAVE ROLLED OVER. SO IT'S NOT LIKE WE'RE PULLING ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM THIS 2026 BUDGET. BUT YES, CORRECT. THEY COMPLETED THE FIRST ONE. OKAY.
AND THIS AND THIS MIGHT GO INTO BECAUSE YOU CAN HAVE AN APPLICANT KIND OF STACK IT UP FOR 1 OR 2 YEARS. AND IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HELPING PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO, QUOTE UNQUOTE, PAY TO PLAY, YOU KNOW, YOU COULD HAVE IT TO WHERE IT'S SMALLER AND IT'S NOT MATCHING.
BUT I HAVE A QUESTION. THIS WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION AND I DON'T KNOW HOW IT WORKS LEGALLY, LEE, BUT WHEN WE GIVE APPLICANTS MONEY TOWARDS PARKING LOTS, AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR TRUCK MIGHT KNOW, CAN THEY HAVE LIKE NO PARKING SIGNS IF TAXPAYERS ARE CONTRIBUTING TO FIXING THEIR PARKING LOT? BECAUSE THIS HAPPENED AT A PARKING LOT THAT WE PAID FOR AND THERE WAS SOMEONE'S CAR THAT WAS TOWED OFF THAT PROPERTY BECAUSE THEY HAD NO PARKING SIGNS. AFTER THE CITY PAID TO IMPROVE THEIR PARKING LOT, WELL, AT LEAST PARKING LOT IS STILL PRIVATE PROPERTY, SO THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO ENFORCE PARKING. I MEAN, THEY'RE TRYING TO RUN BUSINESSES. PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO PARK TO VISIT THEIR BUSINESSES OR WHATNOT. OBVIOUSLY, SOME OF THE BUSINESSES ARE EXEMPT FROM PARKING. AND IN DOWNTOWN, THIS IS A GRANT PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE SMALL BUSINESSES TO IMPROVE THEIR PROPERTIES. I DON'T THINK IT'S EQUIVALENT TO US PAYING FOR AN ENTIRE NEW PARKING LOT.
SO I DON'T THINK LEGALLY YOU CAN MANDATE THAT THEY NOW KEEP THEIR PROPERTY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. I MEAN, THEY ALSO HAVE INSURANCE AND LIABILITY MATTERS BY HAVING ANYBODY COME ON. SO I AND I ALSO CAN RECOGNIZE THAT EVEN MR. GARY'S PLACE, THERE'S PROBABLY A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT JUST WALK THROUGH THIS PROPERTY ALL THE TIME. I MIGHT HAVE DONE IT MYSELF, SORRY, AT SOME TIME, BUT SO I, YOU KNOW, THERE'S PROBABLY OTHER ISSUES TO IT, BUT, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A GRANT.
I MEAN, THIS IS A GRANT PROGRAM TO GIVE SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS AN INCENTIVE TO IMPROVE THEIR PROPERTY. WE WANT THEM, THEIR PROPERTIES TO LOOK BETTER IN DOWNTOWN BECAUSE BETTER DOWNTOWN LOOKS MORE DESIRABLE. PEOPLE WANT TO COME DOWN HERE.
SO I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU CAN MANDATE. I WOULD BE MY OPINION. YOU CAN'T MANDATE BY GIVING A GRANT THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE THEIR PARKING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. SURE, SURE. I ASSUME YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MY LOT. YEAH. JUST BECAUSE I DON'T THINK I'VE TOWED ONE. I'VE BEEN HERE OVER 40 YEARS. I CAN REMEMBER ONLY ONE PERSON I EVER TOWED. IT WAS A BIG YOU KNOW, THEY NEEDED TO BE DONE. I'VE I DON'T I HAVE NO INTENTION OF TELLING ANYBODY, BUT LIKE, LIKE YOUR ATTORNEY SAID, THAT'S PRIVATE PROPERTY. AND WE DO HAVE TO PUT THAT THERE, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES. AND IF YOU DO HAVE TO TOW SOMEBODY FOR A LEGITIMATE REASON, THERE'S STATUTES THAT YOU THE STATUTE SAYS WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO BEFORE YOU TOW. AND
[00:25:02]
ONE OF THEM IS YOU HAVE TO HAVE A SIGN THAT EVEN HAS TO BE A COMPLIANT SIGN. THEY TELL YOU WHAT THE SIGN HAS TO SAY. SO IF YOU TOW SOMEBODY AND YOU DON'T HAVE THAT SIGN, NOW I GOT A PROBLEM. SO THAT'S MAINLY WHAT IT'S ABOUT. OKAY. AND THE ONLY REASON WHY I MENTIONED IT, BECAUSE I KNEW YOU HAD THE SIGNS, BUT I DIDN'T THINK YOU HAD TOWED ANYONE. I'VE NEVER HEARD OF THAT. IT WAS ANOTHER APPLICANT THAT DID IT. YEAH. AND THE CITY HAD PAID FOR IT.NO, I, I DID HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION FOR STAFF THOUGH. THIS WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION.
AND THIS HAPPENED IN THE COUNTY WITH A CRA PROPERTY WHERE THEY'RE NOW SELLING IT AFTER THEY IMPROVED IT. HOW DOES THAT WORK WITH OUR CRA FUNDS? IF AND I'M NOT SAYING THESE APPLICANTS ARE GOING TO DO IT, BUT IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD MAYBE BE IN THE CRA PROGRAM FOR FUTURE, NOT FOR THESE PARTICULAR APPLICANTS BECAUSE THEY'VE ALREADY APPLIED, BUT I THINK IT SHOULD BE SOMETHING THAT GETS ADDRESSED. SO SOMETHING WITHIN THE AGREEMENT THAT ALL THESE APPLICATIONS, ONCE THEY MOVE FORWARD, WILL SIGN WITHIN THE COMING WEEKS IN ORDER TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS, IS THAT THEY'RE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE IMPROVEMENT THAT WE FUNDED FOR UP TO THREE YEARS. I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY LEGAL, LEGAL TERMS THAT, SAY NECESSARILY SALE OF PROPERTY, BUT I DO KNOW IT'S A REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN THE IMPROVEMENT THAT WE HAVE FUNDED FOR THREE YEARS. WOULD THAT FOLLOW THE APPLICANT, THAT OR THE PROPERTY OWNER THAT PURCHASED IT THEN? WOULD THEY HAVE TO MAINTAIN IT FOR THREE YEARS? I WOULD THINK, BUT I WOULD ASSUME I THINK THAT WOULD BE DIFFICULT LEGALLY. I MEAN, THIS IS NOT SOMETHING IT'S RECORDED ON THE PROPERTY. OKAY. YOU KNOW. ALL RIGHT. BOARD MEMBER DE BERARD. THANK YOU. THIS THIS IS PROBABLY ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED. BUT TO STRETCH AN ANALOGY, I DON'T THINK THERE'S AN EXPECTATION THAT SOMEBODY'S GOING TO SIT IN ONE OF THE OWL HOUSE WINDOWS AFTER IT'S BEEN REPLACED. I MEAN, THE BENEFIT TO THE PUBLIC IS THE ESTHETIC ASPECT. AND AS FAR AS TRANSFER OWNERSHIP, IF IT'S IMPROVED, IT'S IMPROVED FOR EVERYONE'S BENEFIT UNLESS THEY BULLDOZE IT AFTERWARDS. SO REGARDLESS OF WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY, THE THE PUBLIC IS GOING TO ENJOY THE BENEFIT. THANKS. ANY OTHER BOARD MEMBERS? HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? WELL, WE'RE LOOKING FOR A MOTION THEN. AND THIS IS GOING TO BE ONE ACTION ITEM THEN UNLESS YOU WANT TO DO IT SEPARATELY. BUT WE AGREED ON ONE ACTION ITEM. SO I DON'T THINK WE'VE HEARD ANY COMMENTARY TO THE NEGATIVE.
THOUGHT I'D MOVE FOR ALL OF THEM TO BE PASSED. AND IN GROUP. MOTION. YES. OKAY. I'M SORRY.
CAN WE DO THAT? MARY? WE STILL HAVE TO DO ONE AT A TIME. ALL FIVE? NO, NO, ONE AT ONE AT A TIME. HE SAID ALL FIVE. THIS WOULD BE ALL. THAT WAS WHAT? YOUR MOTION? HIS. WE HAVE A PENDING MOTION TO APPROVE ALL OF THE RECOMMENDED. IS THERE FIVE TOTAL TO RECEIVE THE GRANT AWARDS UNDER THE BERT PROGRAM RESOLUTION NUMBER 03-2026 CRA. DOES ANYONE WANT TO SECOND IT? SECOND. SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER ZERO THREE 2026 BY BOARD MEMBER DE BERARD AND SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER JOB. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC OR BOARD MEMBER? CLARK.
SORRY, ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS MOTION? SEEING NONE. MARY. ROLL CALL BOARD MEMBER. CLARK. YES. BOARD MEMBER. RICH. YES. BOARD MEMBER. DEBORAH. YES. BOARD MEMBER.
JOVIE. YES. CHAIR. REED. YES. MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUSLY. ACTION. ITEM NUMBER TWO. YOU JUST FAILED TO RECOGNIZE ME AFTER PUBLIC COMMENT SECTION. OH, WHY DID I SAY THAT? ALTHOUGH MODEST IN SCALE, THIS IS JUST A TERRIFIC PROGRAM. THIS IS GOVERNMENT WORKING AN EXPENDITURE ON OUR PART OF 40,000, 40,000, LEVERAGING THE EXPENDITURE OF $115,000 FROM THESE PRIVATE BUSINESSES. AND THAT'S HOW IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK, AND WE ALL BENEFIT FROM IT. SO THANK YOU, PANEL AND STAFF. LEE, IF YOU COULD READ ACTION ITEM NUMBER TWO FOR THE
[2. MURAL MATCHING GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CRA AND APPLICANT OF 221 SW FLAGLER AVENUE (RC): RESOLUTION No. 01-2026 CRA; A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE BOARD CHAIR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STUART COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND STUART MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION, LLC., WHO IS THE APPLICANT, FOR A MURAL MATCHING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000 TO INSTALL A MURAL ON THE EXTERIOR SOUTHERN, WESTERN AND EASTERN WALL OF A BUILDING LOCATED AT 221 SW FLAGLER AVENUE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. ]
MURAL MATCHING GRANT RESOLUTION NUMBER 01-2026CRAA RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF STUART, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE BOARD CHAIR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STUART COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND STUART MAIN STREET, LLC, WHO IS THE APPLICANT FOR A MURAL MATCHING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000 TO INSTALL A MURAL ON THE EXTERIOR SOUTHERN, WESTERN AND EASTERN WALL OF A BUILDING LOCATED AT 221 SOUTHWEST FLAGLER AVENUE, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IS THERE A PRESENTATION FOR THIS AS WELL? JORDAN. YES THERE IS. GOOD AFTERNOON. CRA BOARD MEMBERS[00:30:01]
JORDAN PINKSTON, CRA PROGRAM MANAGER. FOR THE RECORD, THE CRA RECEIVED A MURAL MATCHING GRANT APPLICATION PROPOSING A MURAL ON THE EXTERIOR SOUTHERN, WESTERN AND EASTERN WALL OF THE FLAGLER PARK RESTROOM BUILDING. THE APPLICATION IS PROCESSED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE MINOR CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION, WHICH IS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 02-2026 CRB AT THE CRB MEETING ON JUNE 2ND, 2026. THE OBJECTIVE. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PROGRAM IS TO USE MURALS AS A CATALYST FOR REDEFINING REDEFINING OUR AREA AS A DESTINATION FOR ARTS AND CULTURE. THE APPLICANTS ARE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN THE FORM OF A 50/50 FUNDS MATCH, NOT TO EXCEED $3,000 FOR NEW MURAL ARTWORK THAT IS VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY EACH FISCAL YEAR. THE CRA BUDGETS 20,000 FOR THE MURAL MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM. MURALS THAT ARE FUNDED BY THE PROGRAM MAY BE PLACED ON PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES, AS WELL AS PRIVATE PROPERTIES LIMITED TO NON RESIDENTIAL AND MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE CRA. THE MURAL MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM WAS IMPLEMENTED IN 2019 AND HAS ASSISTED WITH THE FUNDING OF EIGHT MURALS THROUGHOUT THE CRA. THE MURALS PICTURED ARE ON THE GUILT COMPLEX HOME BUILDING, OLD COLORADO IN URBAN BOTANICALS, MATILDAS AND THE VA BUILDING ON MLK. AS MENTIONED, THE PROPOSED MURAL WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE PUBLIC RESTROOM BUILDING LOCATED IN FLAGLER PARK, 221 SOUTHWEST FLAGLER AVENUE, AND THE ARTWORK WILL BE HIGHLY VISIBLE TO BOTH VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND PARK VISITORS. AS THE RESTROOM BUILDING IS CENTRALLY SITUATED WITHIN THE PARK, AND THE MURAL CAN BE CLEARLY SEEN FROM MULTIPLE KEY VANTAGE POINTS, INCLUDING FLAGLER AVENUE, THE BASKETBALL COURTS, PLAYGROUNDS, PAVILIONS, HUDSON RESTAURANT AND FLAGLER CENTER. THE PROPOSED MURAL CELEBRATES THE ENDURING SPIRIT OF THE HISTORIC DOWNTOWN STUART THROUGH THE COMPOSITION THAT UNITES THE CITY'S MARITIME IDENTITY, NATURAL ABUNDANCE AND CULTURAL RESILIENCE AT ITS CENTER. THE SAILFISH LIFTED FROM STUART'S LOGO AS A SYMBOL OF VITALITY AND STRENGTH. THE PINEAPPLE HONORS EARLY AGRICULTURAL ROOTS AND PRESERVATION, PERSEVERANCE OF THE PIONEER FAMILIES, WHILE LUSH TROPICAL FLORA AND THE OLD FLORIDA HUES EVOKE LANDSCAPE FROM THE FLAGLER PARK. AND THE OSPREY IS THE GUARDIAN OF THE WATERFRONT, WHICH EMBODIES VISION AND CONTINUITY, BRINGING STUART'S ORIGINS AND ITS VIBRANT PRESENCE AND VITALITY IS DERIVED FROM THE LATIN WORD OF LIFE. AND THEN, AS YOU KNOW, PUBLIC ART IS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT TO COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION. IT STRENGTHENS COMMUNITIES, DRIVES TOURISM, AND FOSTERS ENVIRONMENT OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION, AND THE TOTAL COST OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS ESTIMATED AT $18,450.THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MATCHING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF 3000 FOR THE PROPOSED MURAL. AT THIS TIME, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE CRA APPROVED RESOLUTION 01-2026 CRA TO AWARD THE GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000 FOR THE MURAL. THAT ENDS STAFF'S PRESENTATION. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS? BOARD MEMBER CLARK. I DON'T THINK I SAW I DIDN'T LOOK FOR THE CRB MINUTES, BUT I'D HEARD BEFORE THAT THERE WAS SOME ISSUE WHERE MAYBE THE CRB HAD ASKED ABOUT COLORS OR SOMETHING. AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THIS PARTICULAR THING, BUT I SAW THE COLORS ON THE BATHROOM FOR THE. AT THE PARK DOWN THERE AT FLAGLER PARK. VERY INTERESTING TONE. AND I DON'T SEEK TO CHANGE. THE ARTIST PROPOSED RENDITION OR ANYTHING. AND I KNOW THAT IT'S, IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S EYE CATCHING. I JUST WONDERING ABOUT. I'D WANTED TO HAVE THE PINEAPPLE TO BE A BRIGHTER GOLD AS A REAL PINEAPPLE, BUT I CAN SEE THE, THE SCHEME THAT THEY HAVE HERE AND IT'S, IT'S FINE.
I'M NOT GOING I, I, BUT I'D HEARD SOMETHING AND I DIDN'T GO BACK TO LOOK AT THAT MINUTES I MUST ADMIT, BUT I WASN'T SURE IF IT WAS THIS PROJECT THAT, THAT THAT WAS TALKED ABOUT. BUT I, I REALLY LIKE, I THINK THAT THIS WOULD BE VERY GOOD TO HAVE IN THE PARK. AND WHEN WE HAVE THE, THE MARKET THERE AND THE STUDENTS USING WELL, PEOPLE, ANYBODY WHO USES THE PARK FOR BASKETBALL OR FOR ANYTHING ELSE FOR STROLL OR WEDDING OR SOMETHING, IT, IT'S GOING TO BE A NICE, NICE, REAL THING. NOW, IS THIS 3D LIKE THE WAY. BRENDA LEE WHAT, LIKE THE ONE ON THE BEACH OR SOME OTHER PLACES? OR IS IT JUST A FLAT MURAL? IT'S JUST THE PAINT. IT'S JUST IT'S NOT JUST PAINT. YEAH. OKAY. IT'S JUST PAINT. AND TO REFERENCE THE TOPIC OF THE PINEAPPLE, THERE WAS DEFINITELY SOME DISCUSSION OF THE COLOR CHOICES BACK AND FORTH. I THINK
[00:35:04]
THAT THE BIGGEST THING WAS THEY WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SAILFISH HAD CERTAIN DISTINCT FEATURES TO INDICATE THAT IT WAS A SAILFISH. SO WE DID BRING IT BACK TO THE CR. OH, SO THIS WAS IT THEN BECAUSE I DIDN'T LOOK AT THE EXACT MINUTES, BUT I DID HEAR ABOUT IT. SO WE DID BRING IT BACK BEFORE THE CRB TO INDICATE WE ADDED SOME. THE ARTIST ADDED SOME BLUE STRIPING AND SOME. THE HEAD CHANGED A LITTLE BIT AND THEN AS WELL AS STUART MAIN STREET GAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION ABOUT THEIR RFP PROCESS FOR FOR THE ARTWORK ITSELF. SO THAT'S WHY IT WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE CRB TWICE. AND WE DON'T KNOW THIS ARTIST, RIGHT. IT'S NOT OUR ARTIST FROM AROUND HERE. SHE'S NOT A LOCAL ARTIST, BUT THEY DID DO A PRETTY INTENSE CALL TO ARTIST USING THE ARTS COUNCIL OF MARTIN COUNTY. AND SO THEY HAD A PRETTY LARGE RANGE OF WHO THEY REACHED OUT TO, AND THEY JUST HAD TO BASE IT ON WHO THEY THOUGHT FIT THE CRITERIA THAT THEY REQUESTED WITHIN THE SCOPE. I ALSO HAVE CANDICE HERE FROM STUART MAIN STREET WHO WENT OUT FOR THE RFP, IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. BUT THE ARTWORK WAS APPROVED BY CRB. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE VOTE WAS ON THE CRB? IT WAS ONE DESCENDANT. OKAY. SO. MAY I CHIME IN REAL QUICK? YEAH. JUST TO REMIND YOU THAT THE CITY COMMISSION HAS DELEGATED FULL AUTHORITY TO THE CRB. THAT'S THE ONE ACTION ITEM THEY'RE THE FINAL VOTE ON IS PUBLIC ART. SO THAT'S WHY YOU'RE NOT VOTING ON THE ARTWORK ITSELF. JUST I HEAR YOU, I HEAR YOU. THAT'S RIGHT.BOARD MEMBER RICH. SO THAT IS NOT AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE COLORS. IT IS. OH IT IS.
YES. THIS WAS WHAT WAS APPROVED. THEY MADE THE RECOMMENDATION CORRECT. RECOMMENDED CHANGES.
CORRECT. THERE WAS NO CHANGES TO THE PINEAPPLE WITHIN THE MOTION OF THE CRB. THE ONLY CHANGES THAT WERE REQUESTED WAS OF THE SAILFISH AND THAT STRIP, MAIN STREET. COME BACK TO DISCUSS THEIR RFP PROCESS. OKAY. AND TO REITERATE, WE WE'RE JUST VOTING ON THE MONETARY AMOUNT TO AWARD THIS. CORRECT? CORRECT. CORRECT. YOU'RE YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE GRANT PROGRAM, WHEREAS THE CRB WAS AUTHORIZING THE ART ITSELF, THE ARTWORK BOARD MEMBER JOB. RIGHT. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT I JUST WOULD LIKE FOR FUTURE, I'D LIKE TO REALLY TRY AND UTILIZE LOCAL ARTISTS, NOT SO MUCH JUST HERE, BUT IN MARTIN COUNTY JUST FOR THE FUTURE, THAT'S ALL. ANY OTHER THIS WAS A UNIQUE PROGRAM. SO IT'S A PUBLIC BUILDING. NORMALLY THE PUBLIC. THE CITY WOULD GO OUT AND PICK THE ARTIST ITSELF. AND THROUGH THE RFP PROCESS, HOWEVER, MAIN STREET CAME TO US AND SAID THEY WOULD LIKE TO DO SOMETHING ON OUR BUILDING, SO THEY WENT OUT FOR RFP, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. SO NORMALLY THIS WAS DONE A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY, NOT, YOU KNOW, OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN BUSINESS OWNERS DON'T COME TO US AND SAY, HEY, I'D LIKE TO PAINT YOUR BUILDING. YOU KNOW, SO THIS WAS A UNIQUE SITUATION THAT I DON'T THINK IT'S HAPPENED, BUT THEY HAVE RAISED MONEY TO PAY THE DIFFERENCE BECAUSE SO, SO THE CITY IS NOT PAYING THE DIFFERENCE. WE'RE ONLY DOING THE MATCH UP TO THREE GRAND. BUT I THINK IT'S AN $18,000 PROJECT. CORRECT. AND SO THE CRA, I MEAN I'M SORRY, THE STUART MAIN STREET HAS, IS IS COVERING THE DIFFERENCE. AND THEY CAME TO US FOR AUTHORIZATION TO DO THAT ON OUR BATHROOM. SO. MAIN STREET, CAN I HEAR FROM MAIN STREET IF IT'S EVEN IF IT'S TO SAY HELLO.
I CAN'T, HE SAID. FOR THE RECORD, CANDICE CALLAHAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR STUART MAIN STREET. I HEAR YOU. HOWEVER, THAT WAS NOT A GUIDELINE THAT WAS COMMUNICATED TO US. IF THAT'S LANGUAGE, THAT'S THAT'S A STAFF AND CITY DECISION. WE DID SEND IT TO RFP.
OBVIOUSLY, WE WANT AND HOPE TO HAVE LOCAL ARTISTS, AND THERE WERE SOME THAT DID APPLY. BUT LET ME JUST GO OVER A LITTLE BIT OF THE CRITERIA THAT WE SCORED THEM ON, BECAUSE I HAD A COMMITTEE AND IT WE DIDN'T JUST SCORE THEM ON THE ART BECAUSE SOME OF THEM ACTUALLY DIDN'T EVEN PROVIDE A CONCEPT. OH, YEAH. SO THAT KIND OF MAKES IT DIFFICULT. SO WE SCORED THEM ON FORGIVE ME. I'M LOOKING AT MY NOTES. SO UNDERSTANDING THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, TECHNICAL APPROACH, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, BUDGET AND COST EFFICIENCY, TIMELINE AND REFERENCE. SO THEN WE SCORED THEM ON A WEIGHTED SCALE AND THEN TALLIED THE TOTAL AND THEN CAME UP WITH THE WINNER WHO WAS GOING TO GET AWARDED FOR IT. SO THE ARTIST HAS IS VERY FAMILIAR WITH THIS AREA. SHE TRAVELS UP HERE QUITE A BIT WITH HER FAMILY BECAUSE SHE LOVES IT SO MUCH, BUT SHE'S ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR A VERY LARGE SCALE MURAL. I THINK IT WAS A TWO STORY BUILDING THAT SHE DID IN FORT PIERCE, AND SHE GOT LOTS OF RECOGNITION FOR THAT.
SO I DON'T KNOW IF IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO PULL UP? I WAS JUST PULLING UP SOME SLIDES
[00:40:05]
FROM MY LAST. OH YEAH. SO I THINK IT'S THE ONE IN THE MIDDLE ON THE RIGHT SIDE. SHE DID, I THINK, A PEACOCK THEMED IN THE PEACOCK DISTRICT OF FORT PIERCE. SO IT'S BEAUTIFUL. YEAH, I KNOW, SO I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT IT WASN'T PURPOSEFUL THAT WE WERE TRYING TO NOT. AND HAD WE HAD BEEN GIVEN THAT DIRECTION OF, OKAY, IT HAS TO BE A MARTIN COUNTY ARTIST, WE DEFINITELY WOULD HAVE OBLIGED FOR SURE. SO BUT I APPRECIATE DEFINITELY BE JUST THAT. AT LEAST THEY HAVE THE OPTION TO BID FOR THE. OH, THEY DID LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. OH THEY DID ABSOLUTELY. I MEAN, WE HAD LET'S SEE, WE HAD 12 I THINK. YEAH. 12 APPLICANTS RESPONDED, 699 PEOPLE CLICKED ON OUR ADS. WE HAD OVER 23,000 IMPRESSIONS AND TEN, ALMOST 11,000 IN REACH.SO THAT'S QUITE A BROAD NET. BUT HAD AGAIN, IF GIVEN CERTAIN DIRECTIVES, WE WOULD HAVE SCALED THAT NET BACK A LITTLE BIT TO NOT HAVE SUCH A REACH, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. WELL, I MEAN, IT'S A BEAUTIFUL MURAL THAT SHE'S DOING. IT'S DIFFERENT. I MEAN, PART OF THE REASON I THINK SHE SCORED HIGH IN THAT AREA WAS BECAUSE OF HOW DIFFERENT IT STOOD OUT TO THE OTHER MURALS THAT WE ALREADY HAVE PREEXISTING. AND I KNEW MATILDA'S WAS DOING SOMETHING STUART THEMED, SO IT WAS KIND OF HARD TO KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND HOW TO GIVE OUR ARTISTS DIRECTION. SO YEAH, I THINK IT'LL BE NICE. I MEAN, ANY IMPROVEMENT, AND I'VE SAID IT BEFORE AND I WON'T HARP ON IT AGAIN, BUT ANY IMPROVEMENT TO THAT PARK IS, IS A GOOD THING. YES, THAT PARK GETS A LOT OF USE. AND I THINK YOU GUYS DID A GREAT JOB. IT WAS JUST FOR ME, I'D LIKE TO KNOW ONE LITTLE POINT TOWARDS SOMEONE WHO'S LOCAL OR WITHIN MARTIN COUNTY. OH YEAH. ABSOLUTELY. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. IT WAS GREAT. AND IT'S A GREAT THING. AND I, I THINK THAT THE PINEAPPLE SHOULD BLEND IN. YOU WOULDN'T WANT IT TO BE THE FOCAL POINT, RIGHT? YEAH. I MEAN I GET IT, I GET IT. AND THE SELFISH NOT BEING THE HISTORIC, YOU KNOW, THE BLUE, BUT IT'S AN ARTIST PERSPECTIVES. AND I'M NOT AN ARTIST. SO I TRY NOT TO. BUT I THINK WE DO APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY. SO TO IMPROVE THE DOWNTOWN. THANK YOU. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS FOR STAFF OR CANDACE? ALL RIGHT. WELL, WE'RE SEEKING A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THIS RESOLUTION THEN WITH REGARD TO RESOLUTION NUMBER ZERO ONE, 2026, CRA RESOLUTION, I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AS SUBMITTED AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CRA STAFF.
I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER ZERO ONE, 2026 BY BOARD MEMBER CLARK AND SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER JOB. ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS MOTION? SEEING NONE. MARY. ROLL CALL. CHAIR. REED. YES. BOARD MEMBER. JOB. YES.
BOARD MEMBER. RICH. YES. BOARD MEMBER. DEBORAH. YES. BOARD MEMBER. CLARK. YES. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ARE THERE ANY STAFF UPDATES? NOT AT THIS TIME. BOARD MEMBER CLARK. SORRY.
THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. I FORGOT TO ASK MISS CALLAHAN. AND ACTUALLY, MISS MISS PINKSTON CAN ANSWER THIS. THESE WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AT LEAST BY OCTOBER OR NOVEMBER OF THIS YEAR. THE TIME FRAME. SO CANDACE AND I SPOKE AND SHE CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. SHE'S HOPING TO DO THIS WITHIN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS, WILL BE WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF OTHER GRANTS THAT ARE THAT WE, YOU KNOW, APPLICATIONS AND DEADLINES THAT WE HAVE TO TRY TO MEET. BUT OBVIOUSLY, WE HAVE BEEN A LITTLE DELAYED WITH THIS. SO OUR ARTIST NOW HAS OTHER PROJECTS. SO IT'S KIND OF NOW I'M GOING TO BE REACHING OUT TO HER TOMORROW TO KIND OF GET A FEEL FOR WHAT HER SCHEDULE ALLOWS. AND UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE IN THE WARMER PART OF THE YEAR RIGHT NOW. BUT SHE'S PRETTY OPTIMISTIC THAT WHAT SHE, I THINK SHE SAID THREE WEEKS FROM START TO FINISH, IF THAT WOW, IF THERE'S NO STORMS OR ANYTHING THAT'S IMPENDING THAT. BUT OR FOR OTHER CONSTRUCTION.
WHO KNOWS. BUT BUT THAT'S YEAH, SHE WORKS PRETTY FAST AND WE'RE CORRELATING WITH CITY STAFF AND MILTON'S TEAM AS WELL TO GET THAT PRESSURE WASHED AND PREPPED FOR HER AND PREPPED. SO EVERYTHING LOOKS GREAT BECAUSE IT IS ONLY A THREE SIDED MURAL. SO THAT RESTROOM WHERE THE DOORS ARE, OUR TEAM IS GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT LOOKS FRESH AND NEW AS WELL. SO THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. MAY I ASK A QUESTION? THIS IS THIS IS A QUESTION MAYBE FOR MR. LEGGETT. I'M NOT I THINK HE'S IT'S HIS AREA. OR IT COULD BE MR. CROSBY. NO. WELL KIND OF. SO THE BATHROOM IS THERE AND I KNOW WE FIXED UP THE AREA AND IT'S NOT AS LOW LYING ANYMORE, BUT IS THERE A CONCRETE LIP AROUND THAT BUILDING ALONG THE WALL? WHEN SHE SAID PREP, I JUST THOUGHT ABOUT IT. DO WE HAVE A CONCRETE LIP AROUND THAT BUILDING? SIDEWALK? YEAH, JUST SOME BUILDINGS NOW HAVE. HOLD ON. PULL IT UP. GIVE ME ONE SECOND. THERE IT IS. THE BATHROOM. NO,
[00:45:05]
NO, NO, IT'S AROUND THE. IT'S. SO THIS IS COMMISSIONER CLARK. YEAH. SO LIKE WHERE THE GRASS IS. SOMETIMES PEOPLE PUT A LITTLE CONCRETE SO THE GRASS DOESN'T COME RIGHT UP TO THE BUILDING. NO, THOSE ARE OTHER PUBLIC WORKS. DIRECTOR. THERE'S A PULLER AROUND THE BUILDING, BUT WE CAN PUT A BORDER OR SOMETHING AROUND IT IF NEEDED. BUT YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, THOUGH I THINK SHE'S. SOME PEOPLE DO IT LIKE EVEN AT LANDSCAPE BORDER. YEAH.JUST YEAH, IT'S JUST LIKE ABOUT TWO FEET OF CONCRETE AWAY. YEAH. AND THAT MATCHES UP TO THE WALLS OF THE GRASS. DOESN'T GO RIGHT UP TO THE WALL. THAT'S A LOT OF TWO FEET. YEAH. JUST SO YOU KNOW, WE. ARE YOU LOOKING TO STOP BUILDING? I JUST KNOW THAT THERE'S FLOODING SOMETIMES BUT NOT BEING TAKEN CARE OF NOW. YES. FLOODING HAS BEEN TAKEN CARE OF IN THAT SECTION. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. MILTON. AND YOUR TEAM. GRASS DOES BUMP UP AGAINST THE BUILDING, BUT WE HAVE PLANS TO WORK WITH MILTON AND HIS TEAM TO GET THAT GRASS AS LOW AS POSSIBLE, OBVIOUSLY, SO SHE CAN PAINT APPROPRIATELY AND FILL THOSE GAPS, BUT. YEAH. YEAH, WELL HOPEFULLY NOT. DON'T SAY THAT HE'LL BE MAD AT ME. BUT WE ALSO HAVE APPLIED FOR A FEW GRANTS THAT ARE PRETTY LARGE GRANTS TO HELP FURTHER SOME IMPROVEMENTS. NOT JUST THE MURAL, BUT OTHER IMPROVEMENTS.
SO MAYBE IF IT DOESN'T MEET WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR AFTER THE PROJECT'S DONE, HOPEFULLY, MAYBE WE CAN INCLUDE SOME OF THOSE VISION IDEAS INTO THE APPLICATION ITSELF, BECAUSE WE CAN INCLUDE LANDSCAPING INCLUDED A SUNSHADE FOR THE THE PLAYGROUND, UPGRADED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, ALL KINDS OF DIFFERENT THINGS. SO I CAN ALWAYS CIRCLE BACK ON THAT.
OKAY. HE'S EXCITED. YES. AND ANOTHER QUESTION, MR. MAYOR. YEAH. SO IN LIGHT OF THE BRIGHTNESS OF THAT PROPOSED MURAL THAT'S GOING TO BE ON THAT SITE AND THE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OF THAT ENTIRE FLAGLER PARK, WE HAD MR. MCCARREN, WHO DID THE ARTS MOMENT THE LAST TIME, AND HE MENTIONED, YOU KNOW, THE LETTERS STEWART SOMEWHERE IN THE PARK. BUT THAT'S ANOTHER STORY. BUT I JUST WANTED TO, TO SAY THAT MAYBE IF THERE'S A POTENTIAL THAT IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE THROUGH THE CITY OR CITY BUDGET, OR IF IT COULD GO THROUGH, SEE IF THE CITY EVER AGREED TO HAVE THE LARGE LETTERING THAT SAYS STEWART. YEAH. SO I KNOW AT ONE POINT WE HAD A LOCAL SIGN COMPANY THAT WANTED TO DONATE THE I LOVE STEWART, YOU KNOW, SIGNAGE THAT YOU STAND IN FRONT OF FOR LIKE PHOTO OPS AND EVERYTHING THAT DIDN'T END UP GOING THROUGH AND WORKING OUT. OF COURSE, THERE IS ALWAYS OPPORTUNITY IF WE WANT TO REVISIT THAT. THAT'S SOMETHING YOU WANT TO DISCUSS FOR THE CRA. OR WE COULD DO LIKE A CALL TO ARTIST OR STEWART MAIN STREET. WE CAN DISCUSS THAT. BUT I DO KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND THAT IS NO LONGER ON THE TABLE, TO MY KNOWLEDGE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. ONE MORE THING. WHILE MISS CALLAHAN IS UP, WHEN ARE WE GOING TO GET THE RESULTS OF YOUR SURVEY? I WAS HOPING YOU WOULD ASK THAT.
I WAS GOING TO KIND OF TALK ABOUT IT AT THE COMMISSION MEETING, BUT I CAN GET THAT OUT OF THE WAY NOW. SO THE CITY HALL SURVEY IS WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO. WE'VE COMPILED THE DATA, BUT I WAS GOING TO ASK STAFF IF I SHOULD PUT THAT AS AN AGENDA ITEM TO COME BACK AND GIVE A PRESENTATION ON THAT, BECAUSE WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT NEXT STEPS. HERE'S ALL THIS INFORMATION. NOW WHAT. AND WE WANT TO MAKE THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO WHAT WE THINK THE NEXT PHASE OF THAT CONVERSATION SHOULD BE. SO THANK YOU. SORRY IF THAT'S OKAY.
THANK YOU CANDACE. THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU DO. THANK YOU, MISS PINKSTON. ARE THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS FROM THE BOARD MEMBERS TONIGHT? SEEING NONE, I'M GOING TO ADJOURN THE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.